Whitzz/544K-RP-Datasets huggingface dataset:
Thread: So Its Like A Diary Huh?

I'm glad someone has shared my pain haha. So glad I'm getting a laptop soon. Not only will I be able to use a mouse again but I can also copy and past again xD I hate how I can't do that right now.
Thread: So Its Like A Diary Huh?

Right guys sorry I've been away for so long. I got my laptop which works fantastic and now allows me to role play on here anywhere in my house xD I wanted to return to role playing on here for my birthday but I was very busy and then when I wasn't meant to be I somehow became even more busy haha. Sorry for the trouble I've coursed all my role play partners during my absence.
Thread: So Its Like A Diary Huh?

Glad you think that xD I really hope all my other roleplay partners feel the same way you do haha.
Thread: So Its Like A Diary Huh?

Haven't used this in a while and I really should of as I've been gone for ages haha. I've decided not to use the forum right now as people in the past just bombarded me with private messages making my head explode as I tried to reply to them all. I shall however be using hotmail to roleplay and before you ask no I won't cam for you. So if you would like to indulge in some sexual fantasies with me my address is dahakaroleplayinghotmail.co.uk I may return to the forum but only if people want to do a thread and if the idea is truly that great that the world needs to see it in words written by us. So don't private message me unless you want to do this. I hope everyone understands P.S. If you want to roleplay on hotmail with me just drop me a friend request on there or email.
Thread: So Its Like A Diary Huh?

Thanks I think its down to having a chance to refresh my ideas and writing. Not only that but not doing so many rps at once.
Thread: Celebrity roleplay

Haven't watched any of this shows. What do you think about Ghost Whisperer?
Thread: Celebrity roleplay

Salome said Haven't watched any of this shows. What do you think about Ghost Whisperer? Click to expand... Ive watched it a few times, and i must say i am a fan
Thread: Celebrity roleplay

So we can work something out of it if you want
Thread: Why do the gays even wanna be in the Boy Scouts?

No, for real, what's the point? Why don't they just make their own hate-free club? Wouldn't that be easier for everybody? That way nobody feels like they're being censored or pressured to be a certain way. Because, honestly, forcing the Boy Scouts of America to change their policy feels a bit like religious extremism trying to shove it down everybody's throats. And who cares what the fuck Chik-fil-A thinks? They make fucking chicken sandwichesshitty ones, btw. I don't go to KFC because they support abortion or the war on terrorism. I go there to fucking eat because I'm hungry and shit. The relationship ends there. Unless you killabuse children or torture people during the manufacture process of making your product, you can believe that Keanu Reeves really comes from the moon for all I care. What say you?
Thread: Why do the gays even wanna be in the Boy Scouts?

To the first - Segregation has a poor track record of being any good. To the second - I don't give money to people if I know that money is ending up used for shitty ends.
Thread: Why do the gays even wanna be in the Boy Scouts?

Making their own clubhouse only sounds good on paper. The problem is they shouldn't have the abiltiy to deny membership based on who you're in love with, or what does it for you sexually. At best it's elitism, and as Seraph said, at worst it's segregation. I feel it would be the latter. 'Equal but different' really isn't the same as being equal, because someone's being excluded. As a straight male, a main reason I left the Boy Scouts years ago was because I couldn't abide their homophobic fearmongeringthey basically think gays are gonna sign up so they can go on camping trips and diddle kids. Drawing a line in the sand, having two different clubs would just further the rift, as if it were acceptable to feel that way. The Chik-fil-A issue has nothing to do with their product. A person's opinion isn't always swayed by a single conversation. Repetition plays a big part. By this company throwing their hat in the ring, it's one more direction the argument is coming from, and a direction people aren't used to. It becomes overwhelming. Add to that the size of their wallet, and consider that if they're outspoken on the topic, they're in a position to donate generously to support their belief, if they haven't already. That's why people are voicing their stance against it, and don't want to purchase from their company -- politics and chicken sandwiches are two different things, but Chik-fil-A chose to tie them together, forcing people to take a stand. Ultimately, I don't feel it's a matter of opinion. I feel it's a matter of human rights. It's not like I like mustard on my burger, you like ketchup. We're talking about people that just want to be seen as equals. The same as black people had to go through. The same as women had to go through.
Thread: Why do the gays even wanna be in the Boy Scouts?

Why shouldn't they be allowed to deny membership? 8 It's... their club, and they have every right to set the rules. It's like whining and stamping your feet that they won't let a forty year old man join as a Boy Scout instead of a leader. No, dude, you're too old--SEGREGATION!!!! Or like a woman crying to be on an all-male pro football team. If you don't like the way that club sets its rules... join a club that you agree with. Why is that so hard? That's what she said. There is nothing they could do with their money short of violence and death that would make me consider it above what I actually want from them. It's like, shut up and feed me dinner, asshole. They put the shit together, it doesn't mean people had to care. You mean you just now realized that the company has a lot of money and can use it to support their own goals separate from you and the product you paid for? No shit. Unless they turn out being like Los Pollos Hermanos.
Thread: Why do the gays even wanna be in the Boy Scouts?

First one--- The scouts are an out-dated club anyways. I HATED girl scouts. I expected to join a troop and find a group of friends and do fun outdoorsy stuff. Nope. Because I was overweight, and went from a different school as the rest of the girls in my troop, I was treated like shit, and even discriminated and wasn't allowed to participate in some events. Second one--- I think it is so stupid how both sides are using Chick-Fil-A as a political statement. The day they made that statement was the first time I ever ate there actually. Wasn't anything special. But yeah. All companies support stuff, and don't support other stuff. At this point, especially in America, that means we need to start buying locally. EVERY company has its evil side and its good side. I had this issue when I decided to stop shopping at Wal Mart. A lot of people assume its because of the whole taking away from small business thing. Nah. I've just had a lot of bad experiences at their stores and after being wrongfully accused of shop lifting, being threatened to be arrested if I didn't give them the supposed item I stole, and receiving no apology when they found no item on me, I decided to stop shopping there. I decided to start going to Target for my business and my mom was like You can't shop there, they don't support the Salvation Army because they donate to the troops and Target doesn't support war. ...but Target donates to a lot of charities and they help the Goodwill...
Thread: Why do the gays even wanna be in the Boy Scouts?

Ahem If I may throw in my two cents...... Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Group of Boston, 515 U.S. 557 1995 Boy Scouts of America v. Dale, 530 U.S. 640 2000 Verdicts Freedom of association upheld. Government CANNOT use anti-discrimination laws to force groups to include members that provide significant contrast to their message. And to the best of my knowledge, these decisions have not been overturned. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Side note I have nothing personal against those of different sexual orientation. However, even if it is not explicitly defined, the freedom of association is very much prevalent in the First Amendment of the Constitution. Unfair? Perhaps, but it's the freedom to associate oneself with those of hisher choosing that's part of what makes our country free. But, to steal some of Muffin's words, it's a double-edged sword there are good and bad things about it. And to quote Seraph........ Segregation has a poor track record of being any good And to address the whole Chick-Fil-A issue......It's a fucking fast food restaurant, not the cluster-fuck that is Congress. Just order some damn food and go about your day. Thank you for reading this post, and have a nice day.
Thread: Why do the gays even wanna be in the Boy Scouts?

Thank you for your input Muffin and Raz. Basically my thoughts exactly, particularly about the cliquey nature of the Scout program too. Why the fuck do they even WANT to be in there? The Scouts are fucking haters, lol. As far as segregation goes, it's bullshit when applied to this. Like, the local yacht club wouldn't let me join and even though I don't have a yacht, I'm all upset and shit. I deserve to go to their party just because I wanna and I don't think I should HAVE to have a boat just to do it. Also, the white power group in my area wouldn't let my black friend join, and it totally hurt his feelings, so we're taking them to court. The world is so fucking unfair.
Thread: Why do the gays even wanna be in the Boy Scouts?

Most people who were frustrated with the news about the Boy Scouts and homosexual membership weren't concerned over the Boy Scouts' legal right to forbid homosexuals, nor was it about whether it was an outdated organization that more 'progressive' people should avoid having their kids sign up for. To many, including me, it is simply morally and ethically wrong of them to forbid homosexuals to join. That's what fueled the controversy. As for Chick-Fil-A, how people spend their money has a lot more power than the joke of a vote they have. If they go to Chick-Fil-A and give them money they're supporting them. That includes their political and social character as an organisation in addition to whether they like the kind of fast food being served up. Chick-Fil-A was well known for having its roots in Christian Fundamentalism before the public condemnation of same-sex marriage by its COO. If anything they've softened their PR stance on homosexuality since then, though the publicly issued statement of the COO that got them headline news, which again to me is morally and ethically wrong, has served to highlight what kind of people are becoming powerful when you buy food from their restaurants. Rudolph Quin said As far as segregation goes, it's bullshit when applied to this. Like, the local yacht club wouldn't let me join and even though I don't have a yacht, I'm all upset and shit. I deserve to go to their party just because I wanna and I don't think I should HAVE to have a boat just to do it. Also, the white power group in my area wouldn't let my black friend join, and it totally hurt his feelings, so we're taking them to court. The world is so fucking unfair. Click to expand... But these are straw men arguments. Are you unaware of that, or were you trying to troll?
Thread: Why do the gays even wanna be in the Boy Scouts?

Solyre said But these are straw men arguments. Are you unaware of that, or were you trying to troll? Click to expand... No, I'm not trolling. I just didn't take this discussion as seriously as you seem to be. I deeply apologize for my grave logical fallacy. So, it is morally repugnant to exclude people because of sexuality, but it's not morally wrong to pressure a privately owned non-profit organization to change their rules based on their values? I am not defending the rule. I just thought it seemed a bit contradictory to the espoused value of tolerance those who oppose it seem to be trying to represent. As for Chik-fil-A I am just going to accede that it's a difference in opinion that makes some people value what a fast food company thinks and does with their money.
Thread: Why do the gays even wanna be in the Boy Scouts?

Rudolph Quin said No, I'm not trolling. I just didn't take this discussion as seriously as you seem to be. I deeply apologize for my grave logical fallacy. Click to expand... Yeah, I was taking the topic seriously. That shouldn't be too surprising when starting a topic on controversial issues. If it makes you feel any better I do feel over-zealous for my response. Kind of can't help it right now... Rudolph Quin said So, it is morally repugnant to exclude people because of sexuality, but it's not morally wrong to pressure a privately owned non-profit organization to change their rules based on their values? I am not defending the rule. I just thought it seemed a bit contradictory to the espoused value of tolerance those who oppose it seem to be trying to represent. Click to expand... I think the tolerance thing is probably a misunderstanding. The majority who object to the Boy Scout's position on homosexuality don't simply want homosexuals to be tolerated, they want them to be accepted. Also, excluding gays on principle and putting pressure on an organization to change its policy via protest are two different things. In this case yes, its morally repugnant to exclude gays because the basis for the discrimination is harmful prejudice. I have a hard time even imagining how peaceful protest could be said to be morally repugnant. I'm all ears though.
Thread: Why do the gays even wanna be in the Boy Scouts?

I was not marking the means as wrong but the goal they are trying to achieve. And it's not about which one is more wrong. They're both wrong but one of them has a basic human right to set standards for what they believe in and a club they own. I am all for equality and acceptance, believe me, but if I make an organization that has a rule-set not agreeable to everyone but based on my own values, I would expect not to be pressured to change it just because I'm not being fair to everyone. You can't make everyone happy and there are plenty of avenues available to all different types of people to feel accepted and find their niche.
Thread: Why do the gays even wanna be in the Boy Scouts?

It's also because the Girl Scouts of America have changed their views about forty years ago and there are a lot of people within the Boy Scouts who want the rules changed but very very few people are making it so that rule won't change. Secret meetings and all that. It's mostly the people within the Boy Scouts themselves that want the rule changed - and the fact that those people are being ignored is what is making it a huge controversy. Also, if you want to end discrimination against a group of people who have the same rights as you do, then what better to start with than a huge organization who has been trying to fix those views anyways? The people who have been raising the most outcry against the boy scouts firing gay people is...the boy scouts themselves.
Thread: Why do the gays even wanna be in the Boy Scouts?

That's funny, some of the things said here. Segregation has always had a bad track record. I wish someone would tell that to the Gay-Straight Alliance groups and all the other groups that purposely have gays pushing to segregate themselves from others, then give the finger to everyone else while crying how wrong they've been treated as if bullying happened to no one else. Boycotting a company for whatever reason you like is completely your decision. Just don't cram it down other people's throats if they shop there. I'll never walk into a Walmart for the rest of my life for many reasons, but I'm not going to waste me breath and time trying to explain any of those reasons to anyone that shops there religiously. The idea that homosexuals being banned from the Boy Scouts stems from a couple of pretty reasonable ideas First, while it's debatable and I'll probably catch shit for it, there's some sources that show homosexuals are more likely to molest children. NAMBLA is even nice enough to exist to suppose this idea and write off molestation as love reading the stories they offer can be quite sickening. Even if that weren't the case no, I don't want to argue how true this is. No major study I've ever seen has honestly taken a stab at this to conclude either way, the main concern I can see that's very justifiable is that homosexuality is based on a simple concept Sexuality. When you have a sexual deviation like homosexuality being displayed front and center, not to mention the male on male aspect of the interest, it's only going to highlight how likely things can go sour. Like it not, not many parents are going to be thrilled about the idea. At the end of the day, if you have no customers, you're no longer in business or in this case, no use as a non-profit organization.
Thread: Why do the gays even wanna be in the Boy Scouts?

I can find you some links that show that straight men are more likely to molest children. Homosexuals are far less likely. And homosexuality is more natural than people seem to realize since it occurs in several animal groups such as lions. Just my little two cents there.
Thread: Why do the gays even wanna be in the Boy Scouts?

I'd love to see you give an example to counter NAMBLA alone. Just one. A whole group dedicated to gay men molesting children. That's not even pointing out the statistics that would be easy to dig up. As far as homosexuality being natural, there's not a single study that has ever conclusively shown that it's biological or natural in any respect, even after all the effort to bend the conclusion that direction. Trying to state that animals can be homosexual concludes nothing about humans. It also concludes nothing about as to why these animals are homosexual. Which really argues nothing about what I stated, Hahvoc.
Thread: Why do the gays even wanna be in the Boy Scouts?

Humans are animals. We're not special but people seem to think we're the best thing ever. Try the American Psychology Association. And the Daily Show of course. I usually don't quote Wikipedia but here you go. So there you go. There are my links. I can always find more, but I think I made my point. You might not want to argue with a biology major who actually looks up research on all things animals for a purpose. I don't just say things to say things. I find evidence and back up what I've said. Just because some people find man on man not man on boy love icky doesn't really justify blocking people out from an organization. There are a lot of myths about homosexuality because people were terrified of it around the middle ages because of the way Catholicism depicted it. Ancient Greece said homosexuality was okay. Asia said homosexuality was okay. Until Catholicism took true root, it was displayed as perfectly fine behavior. If you need links on that, I will gladly look those up as well. Point being, there are studies out there and have data concluding that gays are not more likely. Don't just lump in a group of people because other human beings are messed up in the head and like to state otherwise without any factual evidence to the contrary.
Thread: Why do the gays even wanna be in the Boy Scouts?

Once again, Hahvoc, you're putting words in my mouth. Perhaps it's time you realized you're doing that and quit cutting people down for your own imagination. Anywy, since you don't mind severely biased sources in your representation, then I won't feel bad about mine. I particularly like that your first link has so many holes in it's justification that it's disgustingly laughable. Of course gays aren't more likely to molest children. Especially when, for the purpose of the argument, you separate gay men from those who have sexual intercourse or interest in boys. Homosexual parenting has had such small study sizes that it's hard to draw any conclusion. Especially when you've got studies that conclude either direction, mattering by what you're looking for. Number 3 has a serious issue What causes homosexuality then? Biology has never concluded any aspect of it being nature, beyond all the studies that seek so hard to prove it. 4 - 7. Filler for the article I suppose. 8 states that it's actually true, then offers an excuse. Shooting themselves in the foot. 9 Right from the first line Modern science cannot state conclusively what causes sexual orientation, but a great many studies suggest that it is the result of biological and environmental forces, not a personal choice. Well, since we want to skip around the issue by stating that biology and environment are the same thing... 10 relies on religious members to try oddball ways of curing homosexuality. No licensed psychology can ever try anything like that without losing their license. It's no wonder that it fails commonly enough. This falls into a serious issue about the DSM having removed homosexuality from even being a sexual deviation like BDSM or any amount of fetishes. Why was homosexuality ever even removed to begin with? Stonewall. Not any amount of scientific evidence. Not sure what you're getting from the Daily Show. NAMBLA is very much a real group. And again citing animals concludes nothing. Especially when they can't seem to give an explanation as to WHY an animal would turn homosexual. So really that just leaves me wondering what your issue is? You're insisting that it's okay to be homosexual when I've never said otherwise. Which has all but effectively derailed the topic. What does any of that have to do with homosexuals in the boy scouts? As a parent who does as much research about homosexuality as they do about elections Read Practically none, it's not going to look good on any record that your son is in a place where there's older men that could potentially be sexually attracted to your child.