Whitzz/544K-RP-Datasets huggingface dataset:
Thread: Pro-choice or Pro-life?

I'm pro- choice , because I feel this is such a difficult, personal decision, we don't have the right to make it for anyone else. The problem here, in essence, is whether 'feelings' or 'science' should dictate law. I don't see why feelings should even have a place at this table. There's a certain point where the fetus has brain function and a heartbeat. At that point it is a living thing. Before that, it isn't. Science is how we base logic. It's how we ground reason. People can be as uncomfortable with abortion as they want, and never want to do it, and that's fine, but that doesn't mean others should be denied the option. The fetus isn't alive at the point of conception. There is absolutely nothing to support an arguement other than 'feelings,' which isn't something you can use to dictate the lives of others. People can hold whatever beliefs they want, but you cannot infringe upon the choices of others without just cause. On another note, I'd like to elaborate on something Eturnsdale said. This is something I've pondered on myself Should a father have any say in, shall we say, opting out? I'm not asking if he should have a say in what the woman does with her body certainly not. But, just as the mother has a say whether or not to go through with this early on, if she wants to but he doesn't, should he have some sort of say in the matter? Should a father be able to, during the first trimesteror whatever the period is where a woman can have an abortion, officially say he doesn't want this child, giving up both any chance of visitation rights and monetary responsibility? Whether a woman is 'ready' to have a child is an often mentioned reason for considering an abortion. What if the guy isn't ready, and says so early on? Or should he not have a say post-conception?
Thread: Pro-choice or Pro-life?

Father rights are something that definitely need to be refined. I believe in father rights. I don't give a shit if a woman doesn't want to go through pregnancy, or labor, the baby is also 50 his and he should have the right to demand that she go through with it. Sure, he would probably be required to pay her medical bills and such, but if the man's willing and it's his baby, why not? The mother shouldn'twouldn't be forced to give child support if she didn't want to have the child also vice versa for men btw. But the father should be given a chance. I know of a man who still feels remorse because his ex was pregnant with his child, and she aborted the baby before telling him, and if she had just told him and been willing to carry the child, he'd have taken it, and not demanded a dime from her.
Thread: Pro-choice or Pro-life?

I agree with the notion that a father's rights should be refined It feels that the man has zero say, has to accept what's given to him, and I'd like to see his place acknowledged more. But I can't get on board with what you're saying. While it would be great for the parent that wants it to be able to have it even if the other parent doesn't, in this case you're talking about making the woman go through with the pregnancy, even though it's her lifebody, which is not pro-choice at all. This may not be a situation where a fair balance can really be reached. I don't know.
Thread: Pro-choice or Pro-life?

Both. Pro-choice in that I don't want to see abortion banned, at least not early in pregnancy. Pro-life in that I hate the idea of abortion and wish no one would choose it, and I'd never do it myself. Thinking about it makes me sad. It's just not my place or anyone else's to tell another woman that she can't evict something or someone from her body.
Thread: Pro-choice or Pro-life?

Being both is contradictory, in the same sense that if you were to flip a coin it cannot land on both heads and tails. Keep in mind that 'pro-choice' is not 'pro-abortion.' It is simply believing that someone should be allowed to make that choice for themself, whether we agree with their decision or not.
Thread: Pro-choice or Pro-life?

I view them as two different issues, parental rights are aside from the pro-choice pro-life debate. That is about even having the ability or right to get it done period. But just like any parental right or custody battle, I think father's should be allowed some rights and say even before the birth. In the US, any bitch can turn around and claim ANY man is the father of her baby and demand child support from him. He then is required to get a DNA test to disprove it. But if a man wants to at least fight for his child's life, it's suddenly only about the mother's rights. Not the father's or the the potential child's. I see it no differently than putting it up for adoption, or being a surrogate. But because the fetus is carrying the DNA of the person who wishes for the mother to go full term, I think some priority wouldn't hurt. She dosn't have to know the child or be in it's life. If anything is affected, its her body for 9 months. And if she is only getting an abortion because she doesn't want to gain 30 lbs and her vag to stretch out... well... yeah... Personally, I'd be willing to carry a baby full term if the father was willing to pay for all of my medical bills and prenatal care. And I feel such a thing should only be dictated, if at all, for the fathers rights. I think it is really unfair how men have absolutely no say in the process. I understand medical conditions can make carrying a child difficult or even impossible and if that is the case, the woman should definitely be of higher priority than the fetus. But if there is little risk seen in the woman carrying a baby, why not? Either way, its going to be physically trying. Abortions aren't easy either. As Day Fades said Being both is contradictory, in the same sense that if you were to flip a coin it cannot land on both heads and tails. Keep in mind that 'pro-choice' is not 'pro-abortion.' It is simply believing that someone should be allowed to make that choice for themself, whether we agree with their decision or not. Click to expand... I see her point like being atheist and respecting the beliefs of religious people. You don't believe in religion, but if people want to believe and worship a god, more power to them.
Thread: Pro-choice or Pro-life?

You can't force anyone to carry a baby since that in itself is why there is a political issue with a woman's choice. Men give the sperm to fertilize the egg, but the men don't have to go through any of the pregnancy symptoms, doctor visits, mood swings, weight gain, stress, or really any of that. I get a man wanting a baby with the woman that he knocked up, but if she doesn't want it, he can't force her to keep it just because HE wants it. If he wants a baby that badly, he can go adopt a child or find a woman who wants to have a baby with him. It's that simple. As I've said before, my issue with pro-lifers is that they WANT you to have that baby no matter what. But once it's born? They don't care. It's not pro-life at that point, it's pro-birth. Pro-life would be wanting that child to be raised right and loved and cared for but they just want to make sure you don't end it's potential for life. Women have miscarriages all the time without realizing it and some people call that killing a potential baby. Excuse me, but fuck that. Willingly making that choice is different, yes, but it's the same in that a potential for life has been ended and yet it doesn't affect you in the least unless it's your own body that is experiencing it. And just a side note - I only respect people with the decency to not hide behind religion as their basis for arguments such as this because it holds no bearing on the person in question at all. It's not a moral issue. It's not a God issue. It's a person's free-will that is being targeted and quite frankly, god gave that to us.
Thread: Pro-choice or Pro-life?

As Day Fades said I'm pro- choice , because I feel this is such a difficult, personal decision, we don't have the right to make it for anyone else. The problem here, in essence, is whether 'feelings' or 'science' should dictate law. I don't see why feelings should even have a place at this table. There's a certain point where the fetus has brain function and a heartbeat. At that point it is a living thing. Before that, it isn't. Science is how we base logic. It's how we ground reason. People can be as uncomfortable with abortion as they want, and never want to do it, and that's fine, but that doesn't mean others should be denied the option. The fetus isn't alive at the point of conception. There is absolutely nothing to support an arguement other than 'feelings,' which isn't something you can use to dictate the lives of others. People can hold whatever beliefs they want, but you cannot infringe upon the choices of others without just cause. On another note, I'd like to elaborate on something Eturnsdale said. This is something I've pondered on myself Should a father have any say in, shall we say, opting out? I'm not asking if he should have a say in what the woman does with her body certainly not. But, just as the mother has a say whether or not to go through with this early on, if she wants to but he doesn't, should he have some sort of say in the matter? Should a father be able to, during the first trimesteror whatever the period is where a woman can have an abortion, officially say he doesn't want this child, giving up both any chance of visitation rights and monetary responsibility? Whether a woman is 'ready' to have a child is an often mentioned reason for considering an abortion. What if the guy isn't ready, and says so early on? Or should he not have a say post-conception? Click to expand... Sorry if this isnt a long overly detailed response, but. Science is not how we define law. Laws are written on the morals of society. If it were based on science then a great many things that are illegal would be legal.
Thread: Pro-choice or Pro-life?

Absolutely pro choice. If you would like to use the abortion services then please do. If the idea of abortion seems immoral to you, or abhorrent in anyway, I suggest not getting one but just because you don't want one, it doesn't mean someone who does should not be able to access them.
Thread: Pro-choice or Pro-life?

EnlightenedAneurysm said Absolutely pro choice. If you would like to use the abortion services then please do. If the idea of abortion seems immoral to you, or abhorrent in anyway, I suggest not getting one but just because you don't want one, it doesn't mean someone who does should not be able to access them. Click to expand... That's silly. You could say that about a lot of immoral things and still not be right. Like, I feel if you don't agree with murder, then maybe you, personally, shouldn't be killing people, but don't interfere with my desire to do so. Because I really think killing people should be allowed for those who want to make that choice. I am not comparing abortion to murder, just the argument against the morality of it.
Thread: Pro-choice or Pro-life?

I'm pro-choice with a claus. as long as it's not used as just a contraceptive then people should be allowed to make their own decisions on the issue. Morally, yes, it can be seen as wrong, but only the potential mother can be the one to decide if it's right or wrong, and to live with the consequences of such. and while you could argue that you can link this to many things, like Murder in general, and I'll grant you that arguement. Murder is killing with or without a good reason on someone who has an esablished life, people who will miss them and things they have set up during their time. Abortion with a good reason isn't murder in my eyes. Abortion as a contraceptive or just because you can may as well be murder. Oh, by the way. If you do want to start an arguement to this based on religious ground, I would ask you to think before you do. While I respect people's religious choices, I won't respect anyone who uses the churchChapelwhatever as a sanctuary from the counter when they've been beaten. Religion isn't a weapon, it's a shield for those who are innocent. step out from it at your own risk, but once you do, only fall back if your innocent.
Thread: Pro-choice or Pro-life?

It's not a contraceptive and cannot be used like one. Otherwise, it'd be a pretty useless one, because by that point, conception has already occurred. It is a termination not a prevention. As far as religion, were you talking to me? Because I do not remember bringing religion into it at all and reading back over the thread, I can't see that anyone else has either.
Thread: Pro-choice or Pro-life?

miles said It's not a contraceptive and cannot be used like one. Otherwise, it'd be a pretty useless one, because by that point, conception has already occurred. It is a termination not a prevention. Click to expand... it's a turn of phrase. honestly, over here there's loads of cases where kids have sex with no protection because they'll just abort the kid if they do happen to fall pregnant. makes me sick that they just think of the life they've made as just a side effect of sex to be removed. miles said As far as religion, were you talking to me? Because I do not remember bringing religion into it at all and reading back over the thread, I can't see that anyone else has either. Click to expand... as this is an American Heavy site, I felt the need to kinda defend myself just in case. last time I said anything about a topic like this I had hundreds of Americans using Religion as the counter arguement, and when those arguements failed, they hid behind a church banner figuritively speaking to justify why they were right. hell, in a related hot topic, I said about Marriage being just another way to show love. had one wise ass trying to quote the bible to me, and he fell back once I counter quoted him a dozen times, where upon he suddenly decided that the church would stop me from breaking his arguements down. hell, he even got loads of support as soon as he did that. hate it when Religious nuts suddenly decide that they can hide behind a symbol in order to avoid their arguements being completely ruined.
Thread: Pro-choice or Pro-life?

You know, I almost feel like the concept of abortion as birth control is one of those so rare an instance that it's puffed like like the rich welfare queen myth just to scare folks.
Thread: Pro-choice or Pro-life?

I do find it interesting that the notion of fathers rights have come up here. As one who just sat for my states bar exam, one of the issues that comes up is family lawand as a subtext to that termination of parental rights. That is, if the mother chooses to carry the fetus to term, but wants to give the child up for adoption, the father is required to relinquish his parental rights via what is known as an affidavit for termination of parental rights. If the father refuses to sign such an affidavit, the only other option the mother has at that point is to proceed with a potentially lengthy and expensive legal process for involuntary termination of the fathers rights. The reason I mention this is because it seems that the law provides for a denial of choice in one scenario, but not in the other. Following the logic of some of the prior posts, that the father merely contributed the sperm, and didnt go through all of the heart-ache, and physical alterations of carrying a fetus to term it would seem to follow that the fathers say shouldnt be sought in the scenario of releasing the child for adoption shortly after birth. Alas, law likes to claim to be a field of logic but nothing could be further from the truth. From the legal aspect, like no-fault divorce, Roe v. Wade released the courts from having to punish women who underwent illegal abortions. It also assured that abortion procedures wouldnt be conducted underground, thereby assuring that, to the greatest extent possible, the mothers health was protected. With respect to some of the concerns that have been voiced regarding the trimester system interestingly, the Courts have actually addressed this. In Planned Parenthood v. Caseyupholding most parts of Roethe court held that state legislatures could require women to submit to a waiting period, especially during the first trimester, to ensure she really desires to go forward with the abortion. Where the law gets more dicey on this topic is late term abortions the infamous topic of partial-birth abortions. The government has struggled to determine whether there is a legitimate medical need or not. Plus, from different moral perspectives, it begs the question of whether the fetus is still that, a fetus. Congress has attempted to severely limit access to such procedures, but I wouldnt be surprised if we see a legal challenge to such limitations in the near future. In my personal opinion, abortion is not an issue to be handled by courts or governments. It is an individuals prerogative, and therefore cannot, and should not, be addressed by the halls of legislature, or the courthouse. The individuals directly involved should be the ones to make the decisions on such matters. Okay, Im off my soap box now .
Thread: All apologies.

Real life kicked my ass for a while, wasn't able to be on board here. But I'm back and I hope most people I was playing with won't hold it against me. Except in that I will abuse the crap out of your character after a period of frosty silence way.
Thread: All apologies.

Also, I hope that I didn't inconvenience any of the people kind enough to play with me before.
Thread: Be my Rock Lee? ; n ;

RE Naruto based role play, anyone? Any takers?
Thread: Be my Rock Lee? ; n ;

RE Naruto. Alternate Universe. Modern. Come look. None?
Thread: Be my Rock Lee? ; n ;

RE Naruto. Alternate Universe. Modern. Come look. Woot! One taker!
Thread: Be my Rock Lee? ; n ;

RE Naruto. Alternate Universe. Modern. Come look. Doodoodo..
Thread: Be my Rock Lee? ; n ;

RE Naruto. Alternate Universe. Modern. Come look. I was thinking maybe SakuraIno x Jiraiya? Hope you're still searching
Thread: Be my Rock Lee? ; n ;

RE Naruto. Alternate Universe. Modern. Come look. I'm always searching
Thread: Be my Rock Lee? ; n ;

We alllll bundle OuO
Thread: Be my Rock Lee? ; n ;

I'm bloo bladableblah da bloo
Thread: nude car wash

Name age looks discreption or pic seex orienaion part you want to be boss, worker or customer Desperately need customers please link to main rp
Thread: nude car wash

Name Seba age 19 looks discreption or pic sex male orienaion gay part you want to be boss, worker or customer worker
Thread: nude car wash

Name Genesis Age 19 SexFemale Orientation Straight Part you want to be Worker
Thread: nude car wash

accepted
Thread: nude car wash

Name Caleb age 18 looks discreption or pic sex male orienaion gay part you want to be boss, worker or customer worker
Thread: nude car wash

Name Onyx Age 18 Looks description or pic Sex Male Orientation Bi-curious Part you want to be boss, worker or customer Worker
Thread: You Will Pay For That (LittyKitty & SpellBinder)

Miku looked around, not so sure about the dare she had taken. She rubbed both her ears, slowly pushing the door open. She had chosen a random house, taking the stupid dare her friend had made. All she had to do was go into the house, take something to prove she had done it, and show the object to her friend. Extremly jumpy, she snuck around the house, looking around and hoping to pick up any object. She tugged lightly on the hem of her dress, looking around. She made her way carefully into what she thought was the bedroom, slowly peeking her head in. Her eyes caught on something on the bedside table, and she walked over, picking up the small figure on the desk. She began to examine it, looking it over. She heard some type of sound outside, and she jumped, dropping the figure. As it hit the floor, it shattered into a millon pieces. She gasped, covering her mouth with both her hands.
Thread: You Will Pay For That (LittyKitty & SpellBinder)

Kenshin was close to 7 feet tall, with light colored skin, tattoos scrolled all over his body, with a pair of short horns about w feet long each and curled, his eyes were a dark black and when someone looked into them there was no way you could look away unless he broke contact first. He was not the kind of demon that went around looking to cause truble or anything like that, however he was one to take full control over those that needed it. He had been out running errands what little he had to do, his life had become rather borning lately since he settled into this town that was surprisingly devoid of humans but there were still some here but none that lived here gave him any truble unless he was the frist one to do so and that was a nice change to how things were when a demon wanted to settle down. After all he had corrupted so many beings over the last few hundred years and he had lost friend out of those and he was now content to put all that aside he even had a lot of his memories stord in objects around his house of those he had watched over and cared for. When he had finally finished gathering food and some supplies from town he quickly went home and then approched not knowing that there was anyone inside his home until he heard the crash. His heart sank he wondered who was in his house and he worried what had been broken inside his house. He had rushed threw the door dropping everything in his arms to the ground and then he growled loudly. Who is in my house!? If you come out from where ever you are at and approch I will not eat you or your soul wondering if who ever was inside the house knew who it was that they had been sealing from.
Thread: You Will Pay For That (LittyKitty & SpellBinder)

Miku sheriked as she heard the growl, quickly covering her mouth and looking for a place to hide. His last words didn't register until after she had stuffed herself into his closet, and her eyes widened in fear. Eat her? He was going to eat her!? How were you even supposed to eat a soul!? Hiding deeper in the closet, she covered her ears tightly and closed her eyes. When she was younger, whenever she became afraid, she would cover her ears and close her eyes, beliving that if she couldn't see or hear whatever was frighting her, it couldn't see or hear her. She coutied to hiding this way, curling her tail tightly around her waist.
Thread: You Will Pay For That (LittyKitty & SpellBinder)

Kenshin started to Prowl around inside his house knowing that someone was inside somewhere, he could feel someone inside, though he did not know where they were. His heavy footsteps sounded through the house, as he prowled looking for who ever was there, the strange thing was is sort of smelled like a cat inside, could it be a stray? He started to move deeper in and then moved into his room and found what had broken then he spat out a curse and looked around more, that object that had been destroyed held one of his oldest memories of one of his first friends the reson he had it in there was because of how hard it was to hold them after a few hundred years had gone by... Where are you? I know that someone is inside my house and most likely in this room since I did not see anyone rush around in my house. Do you realize that you have made me lose one of my old memories from your carelessness? Do you have any ideas what they are worth? No I don't suppose you do. Someone as short lived as your kind most likely would never have to worry. Now come out from where you are hiding you little Neko.... I know you are still here there are not many places inside my house to hide. He said as he continued looking around getting closer and closer to where she was hiding.
Thread: You Will Pay For That (LittyKitty & SpellBinder)

Miku covered her mouth tighter as she heard what she assumed was a man prowling around the house, her heart beating rapidly against her chest. She felt as if was going to leap out of her chest, and her ears flattened against her head under her hands. Her tail curled around one of her thighs, bushing out slightly. As she listen to him speak, she accidently let out a small gasp, wondering how the man knew what she was. Relizing that he may have heard her gasp, she dived down under a pile of his clothes, unknowling making a scuffling sound. She buried herself as well as she could, keeping her eyes shut tightly. She didn't know, but one of her ears were peeking out of the clothes.