Whitzz/544K-RP-Datasets huggingface dataset:
Thread: The Internet is for....(Keisuke)

Rikki could tell there was something up with Gavin almost instantly, probably because of his work in porn. He had to be good at picking up emotions or facial features in order to convey the right message across for the camera. But he wondered whether it was because of him or due to some other factor. Perhaps it was a bit strange to see an old friend after such a long period of absence. However, he was determined to renew their friendship and maybe turn it into something more if Gavin was so inclined. I'm fine. I got into some gigs here and there but nothing too concrete yet. But I do have something in the works that might turn out to be something good. He added with a smile. What about you? You got a girlfriend yet? Rikki asked, wanting to know the answer to that particular question. It would tell him whether or not Gavin was unattached or not. He certainly didn't want to pursue his friend to make him cheat on whoever he was dating at the time.
Thread: The Wonderfully Strange Home (Closed; Only Pride, Ravonies, and Alice)

The home we live in currently is quite beautiful in architecture, bearing many beautiful tiles in the washrooms, or bathrooms as commoners call them. What filth, deriving a word for bowel movements with that of cleanliness. Sickening. There are three washrooms, one on each floor, each with paintings layered across the walls, a different floral design painted on each wall. Truly remarkable what a little human ingenuity can do. The kitchens are littered with food, drinks, fine wines, and other fancy feats that not all can enjoy. I, and my servants and pet, however, can enjoy these wonderful gifts of my good fortune. I bask in the limelight of it all. As with any other day, I slept in my bed, allowing my pet to sleep with me. She's such a doll, so cute and loving. It's just so hard to say know to her. Could you say know to her cute face? I'd find that hard to imagine. She just has a way of getting what she wants from people. Perhaps it's her special talent, which then makes me wonder if there are talent competitions for these kinds of pets? I don't know, just blabbering on about it interests me. I called in my slave, wanting her to report to me like any other day. I may actually give her a hard task today I'm still unsure of what to do with her.
Thread: The Wonderfully Strange Home (Closed; Only Pride, Ravonies, and Alice)

Hana layed sleeping, she was his pet, she had no other purpose in life but to her owner, but unlike pets who are forced to wear vibrators every moment of their lives she was, a kitsune so she fell out of that rule, this also allowed her to get out of wearing a body collar or being cum dependent, she had a lot more freedom than human pets, but she still loved her owner, she did however have a fetish for latex and fruit, she couldn't get enough...... but she also has a fetish for her simple dress, she loved her life.
Thread: The Wonderfully Strange Home (Closed; Only Pride, Ravonies, and Alice)

-knowing he was waiting for her, she hurries into the room and kneels to his side her eyes looking over him then to pet she smiles at her sweetness of her- yes master
Thread: The Wonderfully Strange Home (Closed; Only Pride, Ravonies, and Alice)

Hana was still fast asleep on the bed, curled up in a little ball under the covers, with only Part of her tail sticking out.
Thread: The Wonderfully Strange Home (Closed; Only Pride, Ravonies, and Alice)

Her slave name will just be Alice since I read nothing otherwise, lmao I nodded as she approached me. Smart approach, Alice. Hana is asleep, and master's morning has been quite hard, so see to your master, Alice, I said, pointing to the bulge in the sheets. She was my slave so I was entitled to demand things from her. I just hoped Hana didn't wake up during the ordeal.
Thread: The Wonderfully Strange Home (Closed; Only Pride, Ravonies, and Alice)

yes master -she says quietly getting on her knees she got under the blanket trying not to distrub hana she looks up at master her eyes full of desire to please she take him into her mouth-
Thread: License to breed- Do you think yes or no?

I kid you not, this is a serious topic. Do you think there should be a license to breed? How do you think it should be enforced. By what standards would one base the eligibility of a person for the license? The thought came up, and I thought it would be an interesting one to bring to the table.
Thread: License to breed- Do you think yes or no?

I'm not sure this topic is fit for the Academy, serious inquiry or not, as an angle to support it hasn't been included, and I honestly cannot imagine one that wouldn't be serious trolling. So, while the search for varying viewpoints is always something to be respected, I'm not sure what sort of play you'll get out of this one. The mere suggestion of declaring someone unfit to breed, whether overall or that they need to garner some sort of permission first, is a preposterous one. What would the basis be? Intelligence? Health? Accomplishment? Irrelevant, irrelevant, irrelevant - it's a matter of human rights, something none of us are entitled to restrict another person on, moments of venting frustration aside.
Thread: License to breed- Do you think yes or no?

AsDayFades said I'm not sure this topic is fit for the Academy, serious inquiry or not, as an angle to support it hasn't been included, and I honestly cannot imagine one that wouldn't be serious trolling. So, while the search for varying viewpoints is always something to be respected, I'm not sure what sort of play you'll get out of this one. The mere suggestion of declaring someone unfit to breed, whether overall or that they need to garner some sort of permission first, is a preposterous one. What would the basis be? Intelligence? Health? Accomplishment? Irrelevant, irrelevant, irrelevant - it's a matter of human rights, something none of us are entitled to restrict another person on, moments of venting frustration aside. Click to expand... Not sure how much I'll keep this going as I tend to avoid what tend to be mostly political andor philosophical debates... The usual arguments in support of such a restriction falls along the lines that owning and operating motor vehicles or guns or working within certain professional fields medicine, demolition, all manner of engineering require special licensing and acknowledgement from some form of governmental body, but anyone without medical impairment can have a kid.
Thread: License to breed- Do you think yes or no?

However, there are a number of people that shouldn't have kids, though. Perhaps you don't need permission to breed, but your rights to do so could be lost if you violate them too egregiously?
Thread: License to breed- Do you think yes or no?

Mr Master said However, there are a number of people that shouldn't have kids, though. Perhaps you don't need permission to breed, but your rights to do so could be lost if you violate them too egregiously? Click to expand... But what authority could exist that would be able to make such a determination? How could there be standards that would hold everyone to the same scrutiny, and what would be in place to prevent such an authority from using the system as a means to reduce the population of certain peoples in the name of making sure the right people breed? If breeding were something that could be made selective by simply passing a law, then it would have never been a right, but a privilege. Rights are not granted by any government or other human entity. They exist whether or not they are put in righting on some state-sponsored document. Yes, there are people who shouldn't breed, but there are a lot of things people shouldn't do, but they do so because they have that choice, even if it causes problems. Thats the nature of having freedom. Putting aside the moral and human right's aspect of the issue for a moment, just from a logistical standpoint, how would this even be remotely feasible? It would require Big Brother levels of monitoring and surveillance in order to even have a hope of making the slightest bit of impact. Anything bigger than a suburban neighborhood would require massive amounts of man hours in order to ensure that only the approved individuals breed. That also brings up the necessity of what would more or less be a list of those people permitted to breed, and those that aren't, perhaps similar to today's list of registered sex offenders. What's to stop the unapproved from becoming neglected and shunned by those that are approved? Class warfare wouldn't even begin to describe it. The whole idea is so incredibly absurd and would lead to far more harm than good in the long run, not to mention costing ungodly sums of money to maintain.
Thread: License to breed- Do you think yes or no?

Well, if you're arrested and convicted of murder, you can be killed, apparently. Perhaps if you're arrested and convicted of child abuse, you should be given a vasctomy or have your tubes tied. If you've PROVEN that you can't be trusted to raise a kid, you're still allowed to go out and make more of them. I'm not saying it should be done. I'm just saying, based on the question, that while you can't allow just approved people to breed, it might be possible to prohibit people who have demonstrated they can't be trusted to raise kids from being able to do so. It wouldn't need to be Orwellian it would look exactly the same as it does right this instant. We already have a police force, a justice system. This is just a tailored sentence for a particular strain of crimes. HOWEVER, given the accuracy and reliability of our justice system, I don't actually think it's realistically feasible. Works on paper, but in reality, can't be enforced properly. But the same is ALREADY true for ALL of our laws. Which is why it sucks to be poor andor of color in our country. I.e., why it sucks to be 95 of the population. So, yeah, pretty defense, and all that. Well-written. But really missing my point, and I freely concede that even if it were to pass, it would be instantly perverted and used unfairly. But that's true of existing laws, so no big change there, either.
Thread: License to breed- Do you think yes or no?

I move to think of the meaning of the word breed. Humans like to use fancier words for the creation of their offspring, such as procreate, conceive etc etc. When I first read the topic, it brought to mind a project my friend of mine and I came up with to create a human breeding lab, where couples could order tailor made babies from a roster of surrogates. Now, if we're talking about breeding for commercial purposes such as these, than I would strongly recommend there be standards in place, if not just for the sake of lawsuits but also to be sure that only those of sound medical history are creating my perfect babies.
Thread: License to breed- Do you think yes or no?

I can't say that I would be necessarily opposed to licensed procreation, considering the points brought up by everyone else make it more or less impossible to actually happen e.g. impossible to enforce, and giving huge power to the government. But suspending disbelief, there is also another issue nobody has thoroughly brought up. What if an unlicensed woman was raped, got pregnant, but chose to keep the child? As a strong advocate for women's rights, this would mean that government would either A force her to abort which is just as evil as forcing her to keep it or B the child would go to our already over-crowded foster system and be adopted by someone who was licensed. I guess this fits into the encroachment of government point and all, but I'm sure with sexual violence being a rather silent pandemic in a law like this would have to come with provisions for these women too. Relatedly, what would happen to those who bred without licenses? Their children be taken from them and put into foster care? Or with a creation of a law like this it's not too far out on a limb that children themselves need to be licensed and regulated. Much like the one child policy in China.
Thread: License to breed- Do you think yes or no?

Cosmic said Relatedly, what would happen to those who bred without licenses? Their children be taken from them and put into foster care? Or with a creation of a law like this it's not too far out on a limb that children themselves need to be licensed and regulated. Much like the one child policy in China. Click to expand... Well, if this were a program that had actually been implemented, I'm sure we're talking about a fairly ass-backwards society with some interesting methods to prevent those deemed unworthy of passing their seed ie, voluntary sterilization of those unable to meet the requirements for breeding. I'm just wondering what sort of happenings would take place for society to accept this sort of approach to childbearing.
Thread: License to breed- Do you think yes or no?

I'd go with a system more like that in place for acquiring a driver's license--most people can get one, but you have to demonstrate knowledge. I think a combination of taking a class, and some time spent with other people's kids in a supervised setting kindergarten trip chaperone? would suffice. This should be done as part of secondary education--some private schools used to do the tame version, the taking care of the flour sack thing, I don't know if they still do. Also, I feel like sex ed needs to move beyond just teaching about abstinence. People are going to have sex, they need to know how to do so safely, and what to do if someone refuses to be safe about it. Teach them about rapeabuse hotlines and crisis centers, teach them how to use condoms properly, teach them about birth control, teach them not to mix sex and drugsalcohol. fig
Thread: License to breed- Do you think yes or no?

figliaperduta said I'd go with a system more like that in place for acquiring a driver's license--most people can get one, but you have to demonstrate knowledge. I think a combination of taking a class, and some time spent with other people's kids in a supervised setting kindergarten trip chaperone? would suffice. This should be done as part of secondary education--some private schools used to do the tame version, the taking care of the flour sack thing, I don't know if they still do. Also, I feel like sex ed needs to move beyond just teaching about abstinence. People are going to have sex, they need to know how to do so safely, and what to do if someone refuses to be safe about it. Teach them about rapeabuse hotlines and crisis centers, teach them how to use condoms properly, teach them about birth control, teach them not to mix sex and drugsalcohol. fig Click to expand... This needs to be implemented anyways. Most kids nowadays are told, Hey, don't do it, and start doing it at younger ages. Apparently - according to a friend of my mom's who has young children - her daughter's school made the 10-12 year old girls in that grade whatever grade that is. Probably 5th or 6th watch a video that was almost pornographic in nature. Daughter came home crying and screaming about how she didn't, want that stuff all over her. Her mom had no idea what she was talking about and went to the principle. The principle said, Well, they are at that age where they are having sex. Might as well show them what it is. That to me is a bit appalling, besides the fact that she was a minor and parental consent is always needed for movies like that and really any movie event. But that was a bit off topic. Anyways, couldshould a licensing program be implemented? I would love to say yes, but there are those parents who would love to have children and are unable due to sterility and maybe even financial reasons and can't even adopt. I feel like if such a program could come about, it would be way more complicated than simple tests or classes that someone would have to take in order to be a parent. Too many people in this country think that stability is only possible with people being married and with all the people who think that GayLesBiTranny parents can't be just as capable, there would be waaaaay too many more problems to think of.
Thread: License to breed- Do you think yes or no?

I believe the limit in China is two children per couple. It has nothing to do with parents being fit or unfit though, but rather due to the severe overpopulation issue the country has.
Thread: License to breed- Do you think yes or no?

I was talking to my mom about this yesterday and then I noticed this thread I think forced sterilization should definitely be a form of punishment, especially for those who have neglected or abused children and have a history of related crimes. I'm particularly passionate towards this concept because of my sister. Last week, she gave birth to her 8th kid. At least I think it's 9th... we've honestly lost count. Reason being is that years ago, she lost custody of all of her kids. And what does she do? She goes off and gets pregnant again , twice , claiming to want to start anew with a new family as if the 4 kids living with us 2 were put up for adoption are just pieces of paper you can ball up and start all over again. The first baby of the two new ones caused quite a bit of drama. CPS got involved more than once, she went through a selfish streak and gave partial custody to the biological father who was a homeless, jobless crackhead with a history of violence while she had a perfectly normal and moral man offering to play the role of the father. Why, we'll never know, but we know it was in spite of those who were ready to take in the baby in case she screwed up again, which she did. And then she goes off and gets impregnated again by the same bum crackhead as before. If you ask me, if you have children who are currently in custody of someone else, you should not be allowed to have children, and if you do, they should be taken away the second it comes out of the womb. If one has multiple accounts of neglect and a history like my sister... there should definitely be some forced sterilization.
Thread: License to breed- Do you think yes or no?

While I will admit this is multi-faceted issue, I have to say that many of them are based around the societal construct we call morality. But that's a different issue altogether, so I'll just let that drop. Regardless, yes, I think there should be some kind of regulation regarding who can breed and who can't as much as it infringes on the rights of the people at least in the eyes of the ACLU and other like-minded individuals, we've almost completely bypassed natural selection with modern medicine and allowed degenerate genes to implant themselves into our species and if you really think about it, you'll see I'm right. Not to mention that certain practices by humans have become more prevalent severe drug abuse, violent crimes, etc. Therefore in my eyes, something needs to be done. And if I were the one to implement this program, here are some of the criteria I would operate it by 1 Violent criminal - If a violent criminal is found to be guilty of the crime xe committed and repeats crime while on parole, or if violent criminal has an appellate court review and the court comes to the same conclusion, or if violent criminal repeats crime while on parole, xe is brought in for mandatory neuteringfixing 2 Drug addiction - If an individual is found to have been selling drugs or buying them without any apparent source of legal income, xe is given a minimum of two years to find stable, legal employment and certain forms of assistance would be provided to help reach that goal until it is deemed unnecessary. If by that time employment is not found and drug abuse is found to have continued, xe is brought in for mandatory neutering 3 Illegal alien - If an illegal alien is found to be residing within US borders and breeding, the parents are immediately hauled in for mandatory fixing. Then, after a period of recovery, they are immediately deported back to their native country. 4 Extended welfare stay - Same definition as Jobless drug addict, except now if it is found that no attempts have been made to find employment while on public assistance programs and the people in question are found to be bearing children regardless, the people in question shall be brought in for mandatory neutering. Like I said, these are just my thoughts on the whole process and how some of it should be run should it come to pass that we have this program in place. There are other issues to consider, as with all morally controversial topics such as this, but these are the ones I've been thinking about for some time.
Thread: License to breed- Do you think yes or no?

Raz. You forget one very simple thing. If you do not champion those who breed without thought, you do not promote those things you speak against. If the idiot that breeds without thought does not receive help, they will starve. Soon other idiots will realize that they can't breed without thought and live. Soon, problems are solved by their own will to survive. No license to breed, no rights violated.
Thread: License to breed- Do you think yes or no?

A valid point, my friend though I fail to see how it is I'm championing them, as you put it. What you're referring to would work if we let natural selection take its course, as it does in the natural world. Unfortunately, we humans seem to have an honorable if ultimately self-destructive tendency to preserve those idiots that breed without thought. This goes back to your point of not helping them. Yes, they would indeed starve if we didn't help them and frankly, we would be the better for it. However, our current system doesn't seem to work that way in fact, it seems to do the exact opposite. My hypothetical plan of action was meant to work in tandem with public assistance AKA providing assistance to those who need it, not giving the leeches and freeloaders a ride on the coat-tails of the hard-working taxpayer. Though perhaps I am misinterpreting your statement if I am, feel free to correct me.
Thread: License to breed- Do you think yes or no?

But will idiots realize the folly of their ways? They're idiots, they may not realize what they're doing. Children shouldn't be victimized and forced to live such a trashy horrid life because of their parents poot choices. I'd rather abort than to bring a child in a life where I could not properly care and provide for the kid.
Thread: License to breed- Do you think yes or no?

Just because I say you in a sentence does not mean that I am speaking directly to you. Its more of a, If it applies to you,,,, thing. Perhaps I should have been more specific. And I do agree, there are people out there that do deserve to get help for one reason or another. Though there are other ways of helping them. They may be idiots, but once they start getting hungry they will either smarten up, or starve. Yes, I know it sounds cold and I want everyone to be able to grow up and live productive, fruitful lives. Though as long as they are able to have their cars with rims, internet access and fridge full of food they won't. when their kids grow up and look back on the life they had to live, they will be more likely to try to succeed. My parents are counted amongst those who you would not give this breeding license to. They weren't all that bright, and scraped by when I was younger. I must of inherited brains and a strong work ethic from a distant relative, cause I managed to turn myself into a productive member of society. Had I been able to live a comfortable childhood where my parents were able to get most of what they wanted without working, I might not have realized that if I wanted nice things that I would have to work hard for them. But instead we had virtually nothing and only made it day to day on the good graces of neighbors.