Thread: Free speech for... everyone?

Well with the who's the biggest downtrodden candidate with the hardest life i think that largely has to do with the modern western age's feelings over facts where they need to win everyone's sympathy to get votes, instead of proving their mettle, I would say the only time a disability should be used politically is if a person was shot while in the army, and used as a point to show their loyalty and devotion to their country, and even that's pushing it BIG TIME. Down here in Australia, Julia Gillard, Australia's first female prime minister pulled the I'm a woman card at every turn, it was her first, last and only line of defense against criticism, she regularly called on feminist groups to come to her defense and I tell 100 truth at this bit... she called EVERY SINGLE ONE of her political opponents and critics Sexist and Misogynist the man who recently took her out of office, Tony Abbott, she accused him of sexism, misogyny and more, and at first it worked with her supporters but over time it's effect faded and less and less people believed her, and how does this fit into the discussion, well like with feminists in regard to MRAs, she used accusations of sexism and lies to try and discredit those who didn't agree with her. With your point on them not realizing they've already won... that is 100 completely and utterly TRUE! you talk to these extreme left-wingers and feminists and the such and so many of them think nothing has changed in the west since the 1950s, they have no clue that they won and are in charge of everything, that their big bad patriarchy and sexist system and the such have long since been abolished before most of them were born, in fact some even claim that things are WORSE now than in the 1950s... which is kinda true, but now the shoe is on the toher foot, now its the left-wing ideals that are stamping out the right-wing ones, and just like in the 50s, when the right-wing ones were saying the left-wing ideals are stupid, counter-productive and outright destructive, now the left-wing people are saying the exact same about the right-wing. I guess, all those far-left ideals like merging our culture with foreign ones till no traces of our own remain, open borders to everyone especially jihadis and portraying one gender as useless, stupid, counter-productive, violent retards which feminists portray men as now, and as much of our media portrays men as is in no way a good thing. With the Islamists, the problem is culturalrace guilt, we have this huge guilt complex over things that happened over a century ago and that has given those islamists an opening to walk right over us without us raising a finger, as whenever an opening of cultural and racial guilt appears, they are quick to attack it violently, if you talk to one of these islamists which I did with one of them during the Melbourne riots over the mohammed film they justify using children as human shields, attacking random civilians, burning down shops, attacking, raping and killing Christians, hindus, buddhists, atheists and jews etc... on the street, with the killing of muslims in afghanistan when the people we're killing over there are the same kinds of people who used their own minority groups as target practice for chemical weapons. But luckily I have found that such behavior is getting less and less tolerance in the west, and finally it seems that we're starting to say no, fuck you, that shit we did was in the past, what you're doing is in the now! but like I said before, I just hope the pendulum swings back in time, before it's too late like it already is in Sweden. To get what I mean, here are some examples of the effects of rampant, extreme Multi-culturalism in Sweden Now, just for me saying this, I am called Xenophobic and Racist however, I have the greatest respect for Chinese, Indian, Japanese, Mongolian etc... culture and whenever I am in Melbourne I make a point to visit Little Tokyo and China town and other such places because I love all the strange little things I find there and indulging in another culture, but the thing is, with all other communities, they don't seek to expand, they don't want to convert other areas, you don't have gangs of chinese men screaming Stop serving American food! in L.A, you don't have Indians going You can't eat beef because my religion says it's bad! no, they all acknowledge they must abide by the country's laws and just because they can't do some things that their religion or culture deems to be bad, they have no right to impose that on others... but the Islamic community is the only one that actively goes out to convert people, to stop non-muslims from doing non-islamic things, to turn them to their religion, and who lashes out violently when their feelings are hurt... it isn't racist or xenophobic to criticise them and say they have to abide by our laws if they live in our country, after all, all other groups do it without a hitch.