Whitzz/544K-RP-Datasets huggingface dataset:
Thread: Missing Romance (Kitten and xdeviltriggerx)

Heather Kay woke up to the gentle ringing of bells as they herald in a new day. Although, she didn't exactly wake up in the best of moods. No, instead, she stared up at the ceiling and laid there for a good ten minutes more before getting herself out of bed. It didn't take her long to prepare for the day. A quick shower here, a little make-up there and finally some clothing. Everything she owned had some designer label attached to it, but she had stopped inspecting the tags before slipping into a light blouse and pleated skirt. Couple that with some dark stockings, a pair of smart looking mary-janes and her little red tie and Heather was off to join her family for breakfast. Like most families, her mother was very devoted to her children, but her father rarely joined them at the table. In fact, she suspected that he took his meal in the office most days. Which didn't really bother her. It was the way things were and she didn't know anything else. I hear your teacher is planning something along the lines of a dissection today. If you want, Heather, I could call into your school and have you exempted. Linda Lee, her mother, smiled brightly over a steaming cup of coffee and plate of poached eggs. Settling into her chair, Heather only had to wait a few moments before the servants were buzzing with life. Before she knew it an identical plate to her mother's was set in front of her. Although, her cup was filled with iced orange juice and her eggs were fried. Picking up a fork, she started moving the sloppy mess around her dish before speaking. That's alright, mom. I figure it might do me some good. Besides, everyone else is doing it. She forked a piece of white and smeared it across her toast. You know what daddy says. What doesn't kill us... makes us stronger, right? And I don't want to appear weak. That was practically the family motto. Always uttered under their breath like a short prayer, but not always followed through. Still, she knew that appearance meant everything to her parents. Or her father, at least. Sighing, she nibbling at the little breakfast sandwich she made. Conversation went on for a little longer. Mostly commenting on the weather, her after school activities and all that nice stuff. Then it was time to leave. Heather kissed both of her mother's cheeks before leaving to meet her driver outside. The way to school was a little on the long side, but this particular academy was known to house the children of wealthy families and some that were less fortunate. Tristan was pretty lucky to even be among them, but then again, his mother was a good friend of Heather's.
Thread: Missing Romance (Kitten and xdeviltriggerx)

Tristan walked onto the campus, seeing a couple of his old friends. As the trio exchanged greetings, he looked up towards the sky. It was a beautiful day, and today he resolved he would talk to Heather one on one. Hey Tristan, you listening? Diego Caballero, his childhood best friend, poked him. He looked back. Yeah, sorry man. Sorry my ass, you have your eyes on the girls. He razzed him in their usual style. Admit it, you have the hots for Heather Kay. Tristan jabbed him in the ribs, countering his friend's own jabs. I know when you're beat, Tris. Just like you're about to be right now, he retorted. The principal came walking through, the two dropping their fists and shaking hands. They never got overly physical due to their longtime friendship, but also due to an understanding that ran beyond their years. So are you guys ready for that cat dissection in Bio today? As he spoke, he could see the familiar visage of the young woman his heart had been set on since he was a child.
Thread: List Your Favorite Songs

Right. So lets see what people listen to. I'm trying to get new music so I'll be reading all lists Meant To Live- Switchfoot Fake It- Seether Dare You To Move- Switchfoot What I've Done- Linkin Park Romulus- Ex Deo Sancta Terra- Epica Never Enough- Epica Other Side- Sirenia We Gave it Hell- 36 Crazyfists Kiss Me- Sixpence None The Richer I Want You To Want Me- Cheap Trick Sweet Sacrifice- Evanescence Tourniquet- Evanescence I Feel So- Boxcar Racer I Feel So Alive- P.O.D One Step Closer- Linkin Park Lithium- Evanescence Your Star- Evanescence Lacrymosa- Evanescence Like You- Evanescence Call Me When You're Sober- Evanescence Snow White Queen- Evanescence Be My Escape- Reliant K Who I am Hates Who I've Been- Reliant K Kiss This- Aaron Tippin I May Hate Myself in the Morning- Lee Ann Womack The Baby- Blake Shelton Ol' Red- Blake Shelton Austin- Blake Shelton Free Fallin'- Tom Petty American Girl- Tom Petty I Won't Back Down- Tom Petty Shooting Star- Bad Company I Feel Like Making Love- Bad Company Two Steps Behind- Def Leppard Pour Some Sugar On Me- Def Leppard When Love and Hate Collide- Def Leppard Miss You in a Heartbeat- Def Leppard Come Back to Me- Utada Hikaru Apple and Cinnamon- Utada Hikaru Let Me Give You My Love- Utada Hikaru Animato- Utada Hikaru Kremlin Dusk- Utada Hikaru Exodus '04- Utada Hikaru The Workout- Utada Hikaru Sakura Drops- Utada Hikaru Distance M-flo mix- Utada Hikaru First Love- Utada Hikaru Uso Mitai Na I Love You- Utada Hikaru Shiawase ni Narou- Utada Hikaru Passion- Utada Hikaru Sanctuary- Utada Hikaru Simple and Clean- Utada Hikaru Hikari- Utada Hikaru Easy Breezy- Utada Hikaru Devil Inside Me- Utada Hikaru Naraku no Hana- Shimamiya Eiko Higurashi no Naku Koro ni- Shimamiya Eiko Suteki Da Ne- Rikki Otherworld- Ramstein I Am All of Me- Crush 40 Real Emotion- Koda Kumi 1000 Words- Koda Kumi 1000 no Kotoba- Koda Kumi Asterisk- Orange Range Life is Like a Boat- Rie Fu Kuchibiru Daydream- Misato Aki Butterfly- Ayumi Hamasaki Evolution- Ayumi Hamasaki Dearest- Ayumi Hamasaki Shiki no Uta- Minmi Kanashimi no Kizu- Nana Kitade Kensai Tsumi- Nana Kitade Tobira no Mukou e- Yellow Generation New Divide- Linkin Park Leave Out All The Rest- Linkin Park Somewhere I Belong- Linkin Park My December- Linkin Park Where'd You Go- Fort Minor Wake Me Up When September Ends- Green Day Basketcase- Green Day Boulevard of Broken Dreams- Green Day Longview- Green Day Minority- Green Day Danny's Song- Anne Murray When You Say Nothing At All- Allison Krauss Whiskey Lullabye- Brad Paisely Long Black Train- Josh Turner Midnight in Montgomery- Alan Jackson Itty Bitty- Alan Jackson BBQ Stain- Tim McGraw Watermelon Crawl- Tracy Bird Every Other Weekend- Reba McEntire Fancy- Reba McEntire Chattahoochee- Alan Jackson Pop A Top- Alan Jackson Don't Rock the Jukebox- Alan Jackson It's My Life- Bon Jovi Alcohol- Brad Paisely Save a Horse Ride a Cowboy- Big and Rich Five O'clock Somewhere- Alan Jackson Like the Rain- Clint Black She's in Love With the Boy- Trisha Yearwood Last Name- Carrie Underwood Small Town Southern Man- Alan Jackson And this is just a small percent of my musics
Thread: List Your Favorite Songs

According to last.fm my fave tracks are... Marilyn Manson Dance of the Dope Hats remix Marilyn Manson Kiddie Grinder remix Siouxsie and the Banshees Love in a Void GWAR Bring Back the Bomb Deepest Symphony Dead Like Thing Siouxsie and the Banshees Hong Kong Garden Vader Raining Blood Siouxsie and the Banshees Happy House Das Ich destillat extended version Deepest Symphony Tears of Pain Bile Double Fang Massive Attack I Against I Devo Gates of Steel Matisyahu One Day SkabDriver P O I S O N The Twats Brotherly Love Marilyn Manson Brown Bag remix 999 Absolution Gogol Bordello Not a Crime Gogol Bordello Start Wearing Purple Atari Teenage Riot Revolution Action
Thread: List Your Favorite Songs

Mehr Licht - Eisbrecher Herzdieb - Eisbrecher Zu Sterben - Eisbrecher Mein Blut - Eisbrecher Herz Aus Stein - Megaherz Herzblut - Megaherz Falsche Gotter - Megaherz Wilder Wein Live Aus Berlin - Rammstein Sonne - Rammstein Ich Will - Rammstein Mann Gegen Mann - Rammstein Cold Heritage - Lacuna Coil Third Reich from the Sun - Hanzel Und Gretyl Wicked Game - Chris Isaak Bittersweet Instrumental - Apocalyptica Farewell - Apocalyptica Prologue Apprehension - Apocalyptica Death is the Road to Awe - Clint Mansell The Last Man - Clint Mansell Escape - Craig Armstrong Black on Black - Dalbello Blood Theme - Daniel Licht Hail to the King - Dream Evil Chosen Ones - Dream Evil The Orange Man - James Newton Howard Death and Transfiguration - John Powell, Pete Anthony, Don Harper, Blake Nelly The Hollywood Studio Symphony Upon Us All - John Powell, Pete Anthony, Don Harper, Blake Nelly The Hollywood Studio Symphony Superhero - Johnny Hollow Call to Arms - Manowar Heart of Steel - Manowar Behave Irrationally - Motoi Sakuraba Black and White - Static X The Only - Static X Einstein's Wrong - Steve Jablonsky Arrival to Earth - Steve Jablonsky Promentory - Trevor Jones, Randy Edelman Gib Mir Mehr - Unheilig Burning Sorrow - Yadoranka
Thread: Any Table Top peeps out there?

I have a decent amount of DnD 3.5 experience, and a little WoD. That means yes, I'd be interested. XD
Thread: Any Table Top peeps out there?

I intend on running a D20 Modern type thing in the future.
Thread: Any Table Top peeps out there?

One more interested here.
Thread: Any Table Top peeps out there?

Kay, pm me times you are able to get on during the day so we can figure a good schedule to use. 3
Thread: Any Table Top peeps out there?

Hey, not too late, am I!? I can do World of Darkness easy, and if I don't need the books, I'm willing to try all ofthe others.
Thread: Any Table Top peeps out there?

Well, we are still open. Just pm me when you can play and all. Don't worry about books. I got all the books we really need as pdf's so if you need any I can just send them to you.
Thread: Any Table Top peeps out there?

Me and several people have a pretty good group going so far. We only do 3.03.5 but its a pretty soild group. We have had several stories. Currently the group consists of 2 guys and 3-ish girls. So yeah, if anyone is interested pm me or leave me a message on YIM.
Thread: Any Table Top peeps out there?

Me likey 3.5.
Thread: A question of paradox

Well, I thought I might as well see if anyone here would like to discuss this idea with me. Basically, I've been thinking of paradox's today, and one in particular struck me as interesting. If you know what I'm talking about, that would save time, basically, it's the theory that since there are an infinite number of point's between any two locations, travel between the two should be impossible. Example You are running toward a wall, but in order to get to the wall, you must first travel half the distance, and then half of the that remaining distance, and then once again, eventually, you are very close to the wall, but you must still half the distance, and therefore ever reaching the wall would be impossible under this thinking. As far as I know this is one of the proofs that science as we know it is likely no where near as developed as it could be, but I would like to talk about this if anyone feels like it. Oh, and if I misused any terms in the above paragraph, I apologize, no need to point and laugh, I will fix it if you call it to my attention.
Thread: A question of paradox

So.. You're basically saying that we never reach the wall because we always have half of the current distance to reach it? I agree to a point, since I know that we actually do not touch the wall, electromagnetism causing repulsion has us hovering a few atom's width away at all times.
Thread: A question of paradox

Thats true, which helped explain it to me for a while, but what about when there is no wall? Reaching a certain point on a track would have the same affect right?
Thread: A question of paradox

Well, you could say that you needed to get 'here' but since there is little chance of you getting in the exact spot, there would always be a difference. Random paradox! The rule All rules have at least one exception, the exception of this rule being that there are no exceptions. I love that rule X3
Thread: A question of paradox

The answer's in calculus, namely, limits. In maths, you can take certain infinite sums and they'll converge onto a finite answer.
Thread: A question of paradox

Mmmm calculus. I miss it
Thread: A question of paradox

Thats true, I've been reading up on it, and math does seem to play a large part of this, still, I may need to start studying the math now, in order to understand how that works. I'm not doubting it or anything, I'm just very curious, I large part of what I know comes from learning things this way, finding a question and chasing it back to it's roots.
Thread: A question of paradox

What about other paradoxes? Or was this thread about this one particular paradox?
Thread: A question of paradox

Not at all, lets see, what another good one. Well, I suppose you could use this same one it relation to time, but I have my own theories there. Let see, anybody have any other ones they would like to bring up?
Thread: A question of paradox

Yes, but you have to remember that the argument you are posing is that whatever the first object is moves in half distances, i.e., they move half the distance at one time. Humans move on semi-constant distances, i.e., they change their velocities, but they generally move at a constant velocity that is not affected by the distance from the end point. Now, it would be impossible to get against a wall by a atoms width precision, you already said why. But for fixed open points on a plane, you always can get within a atom or two's distance from it.
Thread: A question of paradox

Raziel99 said Yes, but you have to remember that the argument you are posing is that whatever the first object is moves in half distances, i.e., they move half the distance at one time. Humans move on semi-constant distances, i.e., they change their velocities, but they generally move at a constant velocity that is not affected by the distance from the end point. Now, it would be impossible to get against a wall by a atoms width precision, you already said why. But for fixed open points on a plane, you always can get within a atom or two's distance from it. Click to expand... Speed nor velocity have nothing to do with the paradox.
Thread: A question of paradox

Kawamura said Raziel99 said Yes, but you have to remember that the argument you are posing is that whatever the first object is moves in half distances, i.e., they move half the distance at one time. Humans move on semi-constant distances, i.e., they change their velocities, but they generally move at a constant velocity that is not affected by the distance from the end point. Now, it would be impossible to get against a wall by a atoms width precision, you already said why. But for fixed open points on a plane, you always can get within a atom or two's distance from it. Click to expand... Speed nor velocity have nothing to do with the paradox. Click to expand... I know that, but I put that to have a difference between half distances and constantsemi-constant distances.
Thread: A question of paradox

Raziel99 said Kawamura said Raziel99 said Yes, but you have to remember that the argument you are posing is that whatever the first object is moves in half distances, i.e., they move half the distance at one time. Humans move on semi-constant distances, i.e., they change their velocities, but they generally move at a constant velocity that is not affected by the distance from the end point. Now, it would be impossible to get against a wall by a atoms width precision, you already said why. But for fixed open points on a plane, you always can get within a atom or two's distance from it. Click to expand... Speed nor velocity have nothing to do with the paradox. Click to expand... I know that, but I put that to have a difference between half distances and constantsemi-constant distances. Click to expand... And why would that matter for Zeno's paradox?
Thread: A question of paradox

I asked a few friends about it today and got into a rather interesting discussion, a lot of it can largely be rationalized by math, but I still think there much to say about it. It seems math is almost always related to these types of things, I was also having fun talking about the birthday problem does anyone know about that one? Oh, and thank you Kawamura, I had forgotten the name, thank you for reminding me. Edit The arrow paradox or fletcher's paradox would also be an interesting idea to bring up here, another of Zeno's wonderful ideas.
Thread: A question of paradox

I've never heard of the arrow or fletchers paradox before
Thread: A question of paradox

It's a rather odd idea, and not as fleshed out in my opinion, but it goes something like this. In the arrow paradox, Zeno states that for motion to be occurring, an object must change the position which it occupies. He gives an example of an arrow in flight. He states that in any one instant of time, for the arrow to be moving it must either move to where it is, or it must move to where it is not. It cannot move to where it is not, because this is a single instant, and it cannot move to where it is because it is already there. In other words, in any instant of time there is no motion occurring, because an instant is a snapshot. Therefore, if it cannot move in a single instant it cannot move in any instant, making any motion impossible. This paradox is also known as the fletcher's paradoxa fletcher being a maker of arrows.
Thread: A question of paradox

The issue I had with the initial paradox was the statement about the infinite number of points which really only works if you can divide the space with infinite levels of granularity, i.e. if the points in question are merely mathematical figures, imaginary points, that have no actual dimension. That's like, mathematically, you have planes which stretch off infinitely with absolute flatness. Which, as we know, doesn't happen in real life. So the objection I had to the initial paradox is the idea that it applies to real life, the can't get anywhere observation. Because in real life, we don't deal in infinite mathematical points, the actual points we deal with have measurement in space-time, and therefore are finite between objects. An Zeno's paradox can't apply to real-world situations very well, because eventually, half-distances are going to be too small to measure, and the effectiveness of the one object on the other will be dealt with by other forces generally magnetic repulsion, in essence, if I understand the theory on how atoms of one object actually touch or not-touch atoms of another object. And in the arrow paradox, that's because Zeno could not recognize the attribute of velocity or vector as a component of reality, and the snapshot mentioned above is purely visual. If a single instant of reality were to be entirely captured, it would have to include all attributes of space-time, not just the visual, and therefore it would include vector and velocity. So the only point of the paradox is that the comprehension of the measures was incomplete which is also a comment on the constantly-evolving state of science imagine what attributes are present in reality that we can't even conceive of now, but which will be common knowledge in a hundred years. And here , knock yourself out that's where gray got the quote above. The problem with paradoxes is that they are excellent thought experiments, but the physicality renders them kind of pointless in any practical sense.
Thread: A question of paradox

Mr Master said The issue I had with the initial paradox was the statement about the infinite number of points which really only works if you can divide the space with infinite levels of granularity, i.e. if the points in question are merely mathematical figures, imaginary points, that have no actual dimension. That's like, mathematically, you have planes which stretch off infinitely with absolute flatness. Which, as we know, doesn't happen in real life. So the objection I had to the initial paradox is the idea that it applies to real life, the can't get anywhere observation. Because in real life, we don't deal in infinite mathematical points, the actual points we deal with have measurement in space-time, and therefore are finite between objects. An Zeno's paradox can't apply to real-world situations very well, because eventually, half-distances are going to be too small to measure, and the effectiveness of the one object on the other will be dealt with by other forces generally magnetic repulsion, in essence, if I understand the theory on how atoms of one object actually touch or not-touch atoms of another object. And in the arrow paradox, that's because Zeno could not recognize the attribute of velocity or vector as a component of reality, and the snapshot mentioned above is purely visual. If a single instant of reality were to be entirely captured, it would have to include all attributes of space-time, not just the visual, and therefore it would include vector and velocity. So the only point of the paradox is that the comprehension of the measures was incomplete which is also a comment on the constantly-evolving state of science imagine what attributes are present in reality that we can't even conceive of now, but which will be common knowledge in a hundred years. And here , knock yourself out that's where gray got the quote above. The problem with paradoxes is that they are excellent thought experiments, but the physicality renders them kind of pointless in any practical sense. Click to expand... Hmm, I see what your saying, and thank you for giving a link to the wiki. I guess thats the point about all this that a like to think about however, like you said, it mostly only work in mathematical theory, and if thats the case, it brings up the question of how well mathematics portrays reality, and through that, physics as well. I know it's very easy to rebuke that statement, but I still believe it raises a few good point at the very least. Oh, and for the explanation of the arrow paradox, the reason velocity is not factored in is because in a single instant, velocity does not exist, there is no psychical or chemical force we can measure without multiple 'snapshots' of the object being measured that is called velocity, it's merely an idea that helps us calculate other things, much like time itself. Oh by the way, thank you everyone for contributing to this, I love these conversations oh so much
Thread: A question of paradox

Mr Master said The issue I had with the initial paradox was the statement about the infinite number of points which really only works if you can divide the space with infinite levels of granularity, i.e. if the points in question are merely mathematical figures, imaginary points, that have no actual dimension. That's like, mathematically, you have planes which stretch off infinitely with absolute flatness. Which, as we know, doesn't happen in real life. So the objection I had to the initial paradox is the idea that it applies to real life, the can't get anywhere observation. Because in real life, we don't deal in infinite mathematical points, the actual points we deal with have measurement in space-time, and therefore are finite between objects. An Zeno's paradox can't apply to real-world situations very well, because eventually, half-distances are going to be too small to measure, and the effectiveness of the one object on the other will be dealt with by other forces generally magnetic repulsion, in essence, if I understand the theory on how atoms of one object actually touch or not-touch atoms of another object. Click to expand... The thing with the paradox is you are dealing with an infinite number of distances because we're talking about fractional parts of length. Doesn't matter the length you use. You're simply going by halves, which you can take infinite amounts of half of a half of a half of a half of a... etc. That you can't measure is also not a problem.