Whitzz/544K-RP-Datasets huggingface dataset:
Thread: Why do the gays even wanna be in the Boy Scouts?

Nambla being a joke is sarcasm, which you clearly missed. Also, it's an organization comprised of exactly 1100 members, and the LGBT community has completely cut ties with the group in question because they don't believe in their philosophy and the things they want to be made into law. Biology does conclude it being nature. It's a failsafe to keep populations from exploding much like sterility in males and infertility in females. Animals don't just turn gay, just like human beings don't just turn gay, since ya know, we're animals as well. Sexual abuse is always going to be have an impact on mental faculties, but it doesn't conclude much with your link since it flipflops if we are going to be so nit-picky. Animals are all instincts to a good degree compared to human beings who have had most of their instincts bred out of them. Why assume that they wouldn't be a good indication? They don't think about what their relationship might do to effect the herd when it doesn't have any actual effect except making hetero animals have more choices in their mates. They just did a story on one of the penguin groups at the zoo with a homosexual couple trying to incubate different objects because they wanted an egg. That's instinctive for them to take care of an egg but knew enough to know that they couldn't produce an egg together and kept trying to substitute. Being gay isn't a mental illness, being into children is as you clearly defined in the last part of your post. A man or a woman could be sexually attracted to any children I could potentially have in the future but I wouldn't say They must be gay! That's pretty unfounded since, by psychology studies, children are genderless until they hit puberty which is why adult men or women find no sexual attraction to other people their age when they have a sexual attraction to children. Every person has a preference, and if a man finds little boys sexually attractive, that's his twisted preference. As I've said, I won't cut people out of an organization because I somehow assume I know their life just because they happen to be gay or otherwise. If you don't do the research, you'll just remain in ignorance and since the Girl Scouts of America already changed their tune regarding homosexuality as well as most well-known organizations that deal in studying sexuality, psychology, and other mental and biological important fields, and how most of the organization of the Boy Scouts wants the rules changed to stop discrimination, well, it might just change things.
Thread: Why do the gays even wanna be in the Boy Scouts?

Wait a minute. You honestly believe homosexuality is some sort of failsafe to population control? Are you really daft enough to believe that? There really isn't much to say about it if you live in this fantasy world where there's a sweet explanation for everything. That' not even touching on the other aspects that you state and I might add, without any sort of citation that are ridiculous. I'm particularly intrigued that you state one sexual preference isn't an illness, then another is. Is homosexuality not an illness where pedophilia is simply because one is viewed more wrong than the other?
Thread: Why do the gays even wanna be in the Boy Scouts?

Pedophilia is NOT a sexuality..... wtf?
Thread: Why do the gays even wanna be in the Boy Scouts?

Then you can debate that with Hahvoc.
Thread: Why do the gays even wanna be in the Boy Scouts?

I never said it was sexuality. I said it was a mental illness. Clearly you miss that part. And I'm not daft. I study this crap as I am a biology major and have read plenty of things stating that there is enough evidence within nature to back me up which you've ignored. Hahvoc said Being gay isn't a mental illness, being into children is Click to expand... Firm Master said I'm particularly intrigued that you state one sexual preference isn't an illness, then another is. Is homosexuality not an illness where pedophilia is simply because one is viewed more wrong than the other? Click to expand... That right there is the biggest load of shit I'd read in quite awhile. Homosexuality isn't more wrong than being heterosexual. As a meme quote, Seeing straight people kiss all my life never made me straight. Being into children IS A MENTAL ILLNESS as I've stated before. I said preferences to clarify a point. Human beings always have preferences even when fucked up in the head. Might wanna reread before you post and assume otherwise.
Thread: Why do the gays even wanna be in the Boy Scouts?

Firm Master said Then you can debate that with Hahvoc. Click to expand... It seems this thread got way out of hand really fast. I don't even think you're in the same topic. And not to beat a dead horse but what you did say was kind of offensive to homosexuals, being as I am one, and yes, my jimmies were quite rustled by your statements regarding homosexuality and pedophilia. Anyhow gravitating back to the ORIGINAL topic of exclusion in the boy scouts, I actually feel Rudolph has a solid point as does Raz and Muffin in the corresponding topics people have the right to association, first Amendment basics. If you don't LIKE the rules the club has in place then I suppose instead of attempting to join said club you should just avoid it and create your own. If your opinion on the matter is right or at least widely accepted YOUR organization will become the norm and the original organization will become obsolete. For instance, if I wanted to create a Scout equidistant that was unisex and allowed gay members and banned all who show any sign of homophobia then I'm perfectly allowed too. If there are as many people upset about this situation as this thread seems to declare then my club will quickly over power the original boyscouts and, in due time, the original club will be obsolete or utterly non-existent. Regardless of the situation though, butts on both sides of the argument will be hurt and you honestly can't do anything to stop it. Everyone is a critic and people are going to whine and complain even when they get there way. In the end no one wants equality, they want justice they want to feel SUPERIOR as payment for all the years of inferiority. This is a completely human emotion, but its whether or not you decide to act upon it that makes you a good person or someone destined to be a villain on Scooby-doo. As per the subject of Chick-fil-a, who the hell cares?!? you can bitch all you want about their stance but your opinion and money is not going to sway this billion dollar corporation either way. It takes millions and millions of dollars and a huge gathering of people to change a stance of a corporation. As it stands, no one is currently organizing or boycotting in large enough numbers to even leave a dent. So if you're gay, eat your shitty chicken sandwich with pride, because your 2.98 did not condemn homosexuals. Even if you bought a chicken sandwich ever day for the rest of your life the only thing you'd effect is your cholesterol level. SIDE NOTE all proper nouns, such as boy scouts and Chic-fil-a are simply examples. These theories can apply to ANY company, ANY political stance, and ANY social group.
Thread: Why do the gays even wanna be in the Boy Scouts?

Hahvoc. Let's start off with one clear thing. I did not say homosexuality is wrong. Again, quit putting words in my mouth. children are genderless until they hit puberty which is why adult men or women find no sexual attraction to other people their age when they have a sexual attraction to children. Click to expand... That would be a sexual preference, now wouldn't it? Every person has a preference, and if a man finds little boys sexually attractive, that's his twisted preference. Click to expand... Alright then, it's a sexual preference. Glad we agree. Being gay isn't a mental illness, being into children is Click to expand... Okay. And what's the distinction? What makes one an illness and the other not? The only answer I've gotten is that one is wrong and the other isn't. As far as studying biology, congrats. If anything it shows a bias. Dr. Nibbles, if it's something you're taking personally, it makes it very hard to discuss the issue. I'm not here to piss anyone off. I'm hear to share an alternate view. Call it devil's advocate if you want. I just hate seeing a topic turn into a blind circle jerk. You are right, though. This topic has gotten way out of hand. I still stand by my opinion that an average parent isn't going to be so thrilled about having a homosexual troop leader. In turn, the potential lost business wouldn't be welcome. Is it fair? Not really. Is it a business move? Naturally. You hear about a politician or CEO that gets caught fucking a mistress on the side and he is either booted from his job or resigns. It shows no reflection on his job. It shows a reflection on how customers will view the company.
Thread: Why do the gays even wanna be in the Boy Scouts?

Dr. Nibbles, if it's something you're taking personally, it makes it very hard to discuss the issue. I'm not here to piss anyone off. I'm hear to share an alternate view. Call it devil's advocate if you want. I just hate seeing a topic turn into a blind circle jerk. Click to expand... Perhaps offended was the wrong term to use or rustled jimmies the point I was trying to make is that AS a homosexual I'm drawing your attention to some REALLY harsh claims that I don't think you have the evidence to support. I'm not 100 defending everything Hahvy says but you are kinda jumping down her throat, which seems to be a sign of your OWN personal bias. If this is your opinion and you believe homosexuality is wrong, or that its natural or that the chicken came before the egg or whatever you're not wrong in holding your own opinion but simply accept that as your opinion and when others state theirs don't fight back with your own with a crusader's mentality. Especially if you're going to declare playing devil's advocate when shit starts to hit the fan which it has. The entire Homosexuality is a choice argument is the most flawed social argument of our times, and sadly is just as easily taken apart by one question as it being natural. The question is Do you have any proof otherwise? no, no we don't. And the longer we argue using flimsy theories as basis for our platforms instead of cold hard facts the longer this gay v straight bout will last. Its absolutely ridiculous that we're over a decade into the 21st century and gay marriage is still A thing and not a widely accepted and enforced law. Statistics should be our stance on such laws. The statistics of successful gay marriges to successful straight marriages. The number of criminals adopted out in comparison to gay and straight families. The number of serial rapists, molesters and murders that come from both the gay and straight communities. The number of successful gay men and women as opposed to unsucessful straight men and women. Why has no one EVER thought of using these as a platform for any argument? Why is it always The bibble says so or its not natural or Its only natural. For Christ's sake, when did numbers and actual hard core fact become so obsolete? This all considered, the entire question this thread is rested upon is choice. Choice of the organization and the potential members. If you feel threatened or offended by a group, getting them to change their rule will NOT remove that feeling. People within a group may abide by a rule but will not change their opinion accordingly. Just because the boy scout manual says gays are cool beans will not make the original members feel the same. Gays will still be persecuted for no reason in those groups for several generations, despite the rules. Just as blacks, just as women, just as american colonists, just as American Indians, just as Jewish Egyptians, just as goddamn assimilated tribes. If you truly want something to change, the best thing to do is START OVER. Eradicate the existing and rebuild.
Thread: The KingdomHearts(the land of the elves and other mystical creatures)

Hello everyone my name is Fuschia.violence i am new to bluemoon and i would like to meet new people i enjoy roleplaying as a means of getting away from reality for a few hours please feel free to add me if you all wish. i wanted to create this forum for any one who wants to come up with a rp scene i am up for any idea but please keep the sexual rp to a minimum thank you. -signs Fuschia Marie Violence-
Thread: Gentle but strong literate woman needed. Big, curvy ladies welcome!

RE Gentle but strong literate woman needed. how the concern is planning to hurt him? physically or economically? And how she is to save him?
Thread: Gentle but strong literate woman needed. Big, curvy ladies welcome!

My partner disappeared for this...Please come and try me.
Thread: Gentle but strong literate woman needed. Big, curvy ladies welcome!

Bumpity thumpity.
Thread: Gentle but strong literate woman needed. Big, curvy ladies welcome!

Why, oh why? PM me or reply.
Thread: Mark and Murrin's Loft Apartment:

Mark and Murrin's Loft Apartment
Thread: Mark and Murrin's Loft Apartment:

Name Mark Owens Ring NameNickname Attire White button down slightly opened, white t-shirt, jeans, black shoes Location Mark and Murrin's Loft Apartment Tagging No one Friday June 6, 2014 Later afternoon Mark pulled into the parking lot and parked his car. He got out, locked up and headed up to his and Murrin's loft. Once inside, he locked the door behind himself and kicked off his shoes. He just couldn't stop grinning. The day had been the craziest day ever, but it was turning out to be a good one when all was said and done. He'd scored tickets to a wrestling show, made some new friends and for the first time in what seemed like forever... his sister was finally smiling. Finally. It made all the sacrifices he'd made worth it to see her smile when she'd walked off with Joseph like that. It was the best thing in the world to him. He then grabbed a bottled water out of the fridge and went up the stairs to his room and laid down. Lacing his fingers behind his head he stared at the ceiling and smiled. He couldn't wait to find out how things went later on with his sister when he saw her at the Fuze Box in a couple hours.
Thread: Mark and Murrin's Loft Apartment:

Name Mark Owens Ring NameNickname Attire Navy blue button down slightly opened, white t-shirt, jeans, black shoes Location Mark and Murrin's Loft Apartment Tagging No one Friday June 6, 2014 Early evening Mark was excited to meet up with Murrin and his new friends at the Fuze Box. He quickly took a shower and got dressed up for going out. Since the club wasn't too far away and he knew he'd probably drink a bit, he decided it was best to walk. Plus, he remembered most of his new friends mentioning that they lived either in or nearby the complex that was next to his and Murrin's place. As Mark made his way to the club, he walked past the Sunny Hill Apartment Complex, which was only about a block away from the loft he and Murrin shared. He grinned now knowing that his new friends lived so close by. As he got closer to the Fuze Box, he was curious to talk to his sister and find out how things went with her. Given that she went out to dinner, he took that to be a good sign indeed. He just hoped things continued in this manner. That was his hope for her and he'd hold onto that and wish for it with all that he was. Exits to the Fuze Box
Thread: Rape Culture

So I read through this article and it really got me thinking about how exactly women get into a situation that ended up with them being raped by a guy that they knew. To me, it seemed like the case of the sociopath where the guy was all charming and then made his move when the woman was in a vulnerable position. This just made me seethink there is a lot more to it than that. And that yes, there are people who will excuse it away because they don't want to hear itdeal with it. So what are your thoughts on this? Do you think that after reading those that it could very well be true? That in some cases, people are feeding the ability to rape? That they are setting up a space so to speak, that allows a person to exercise creepy behavior that could then turn into rape? What do you think about this Rape Culture?
Thread: Rape Culture

I can speak up on this from my own personal experiences..... Back during college, I was friends with a lot of guys. One of them I was a bit closer to and he betrayed my trust and attempted rape on me. He didn't have the classic signs of creeper per se only because I'd been a bit closer to him as a friend and wrote some of the things off myself being naive and young. But after the occurrence, when I tried to bring it up to my other guy friends.... none of them, save the brother of the guy who attempted the rape and caught him in the act which is what stopped it, would buy into anything. All of them wrote it off and said that I was playing hard to get and asked for it and that I was just trying to cause drama amongst them all. Funny thing was, I was still going out with my ex at that time and though things between he and I were on the way out, I'd never have cheated on him. And ALL of them knew that. Yet all of them wrote off what I had to say. And what was worse was I saw him starting to prey on another girl in the group. Didn't matter. Needless to say, I ended up just cutting all ties with every last one of them and I haven't spoken to a single one since that time.
Thread: Rape Culture

Outfits don't encourage rape. I will never believe what you wear makes anyone deserving or asking for it. It's called a person decides that the person wearing whatever is in need of what they have to give - whether they want it or not. That's really disturbing though.
Thread: Rape Culture

It's definitely got nothing to do with what you wear. My ex friend who attempted to rape me..... I was wearing jeans and a t-shirt. Can't get any dumpier than that. Plus, my ex-boyfriend at the time also coercedforced me all the time and that definitely was independent of what I wore. It was all about control. I was a target. Someone easily controlled and overpowered. THAT was why anything happened in those situations for me given that they occurred with people I freakin' KNEW!
Thread: Rape Culture

That's exactly it. Rape is rape and it's a violation. End of story. I mean, even with my attempted rape where he merely violated my mouth with his tongue and just got most of my clothes off, I felt pretty fucking violated. And people have said... well, at least he wasn't successful. And I still felt like, well, why the fuck did he even try in the first place? I did nothing to warrant that. At all. And his actions forever changed me. Same thing with my ex-boyfriend. People said well at least he was your boyfriend and you sort of consented. Thing is... no. I didn't. I never consented. Succumbed is the better answer and I won't even use the term submit because that isn't appropriate either. I didn't submit willingly. I was succumbing to the fact that I felt I had no other alternative.
Thread: Rape Culture

--Hahvoc Requiem-- said So I read through this article and it really got me thinking about how exactly women get into a situation that ended up with them being raped by a guy that they knew. To me, it seemed like the case of the sociopath where the guy was all charming and then made his move when the woman was in a vulnerable position. This just made me seethink there is a lot more to it than that. And that yes, there are people who will excuse it away because they don't want to hear itdeal with it. So what are your thoughts on this? Do you think that after reading those that it could very well be true? That in some cases, people are feeding the ability to rape? That they are setting up a space so to speak, that allows a person to exercise creepy behavior that could then turn into rape? What do you think about this Rape Culture? Click to expand... Thank you for posting this Hahvy. It was a really awesome read the whole time during reading the first two letters I felt the frustration and helplessness of those women, because it IS in my nature to be nonconfrontational and to second guess myself when taking a stand where another person might feel hurt. Reading those alone, I'd have no answers for them and it feels just wrong that they should be forced to deal with continuing to be in those situations. But during the responses I just kept feeling a very triumphant yeah! It's a very empowering set of words and I DO believe in scenarios like that, predatory behavior is allowed and encouraged by the menand by extension of being pressured to keep quiet and be good, the women as well of these social groups. I think that the advice and scripts given were the most effective ways to deal with the situations, particularly the last one where they tell her to leave her boyfriend if he cannot agree to her terms. I think that part of what this person was saying about the Rape Culture is that 1. the full responsibility of dealing with these predators that invade these social groups does not fall on the women's shoulders and 2. but they are not powerless to make changes and they do not have to tolerate being forced to continue encouraging the charade.
Thread: Rape Culture

Well, I think the article presents some very clear ways that everyone can help prevent this sort of thing from happening by removing the inviting and encouraging atmosphere that allows these predators to survive. If EVERYONE agrees to punish this behavior and take a stand then these rapistspotential rapists will have nowhere to hide or continue their assault. But I also agree that it falls heavily on the men's shoulders because THAT is where a rapist will look for encouragement of his behavior. He will look for victims in the women but he will look for friends in the men. He cannot always assure that a woman will keep quiet but if he also cannot depend on the men of the group reacting a certain way, then he's in trouble, isn't he?
Thread: Rape Culture

That's so true in a lot of ways. I know with my own experience, the guy who attempted rape on me looked to his friends and my friends, at that time for back up. They all ganged up on me when I spoke up on the matter. They all said that I gave him signs of 'the go ahead'. Because I'd confided in him about my shaky and abusive relationship, because I went to him for support. So, because I did all that and told him that I needed to get out of my relationship that I was in at that time... that meant I wanted him to pursue me. And when he made a move and I said no... clearly that meant 'yes'. So that mean he could attempt rape. Oh silly fucking me. Oh what on earth was I thinking?!?! Clearly I was a dumbass. Just goes to show the mentality and how people will rationalize their behaviors as right or justified so that they feel better about what they did even if it is most definitely wrong. It's just disgusting at how not only the one guy did this, but his friends did as well. At least I wasn't dumb enough to allow them to get away with it and cut all ties. I warned the one girl I saw him setting his sights on next and then never looked back.
Thread: Rape Culture

It just reminds me of when I was looking up stories on the Slut Walks that have been taking place around the globe. One girl put on a poster that she had gotten drunk one night and some guy at the party had raped her on the stairs near the parking garage or something like that. Her boyfriend at the time had said it was all her fault for being stupid and drunk and was probably giving the proper signals. And apparently all of her friends thought it was her fault too. The title of it said, My rapist doesn't know he's a rapist. And it's true, because everyone had his back on what he did. Just a note This kind of thing makes me happy I live in Mass because unless the person is sober and says yes, it's rape. Massachusetts ramped up the rape law because intoxication isn't a sign of Yeah! Lets fuck.
Thread: Rape Culture

That is one thing that Ive never understood. You aren't considered responsible enough to consent when you're drunk, but you are considered responsible for your actions if you get in a car and drive.