Whitzz/544K-RP-Datasets huggingface dataset:
Thread: the structure of space

zinn bent down next to a human soldier tending to his open leg wound .his tibia snapped in two she had sedated him his fear of her had gotten in the way. the city rocked around them with explosions of ships at war she was the enemy but she did what she could .the humans confused her .a sentient being willing to destroy other beings out of fear when peace ids offered killing themselves when captured or killing there comrades for surrender .once she was finished she tagged him inserting a chip into his shoulder. with her field kit and then dragging him off into a side ally hiding him she wished it didn't have to be this way her people would interagraet the humans int there society and occupy the planet as they had the colonies on mars her technology was mainly biologically based and she appeared human in most ways. her distinguishing features were that she had green skin and red hair with flowers and leaves growing in it .she had milk green eyes .she looked up distracted as a war ship flew over head she didn't recognize it this wasn't good. char sheet namezinn racesentianplant person real appearance unknown by the humans appearanceshe has pale green skin and milky green eyes the full eye is this color she has fire red hair with leaves and flowers she is 4'5 and childlike in appearance she has assimilated with her biologically grown suit that was modeled and disighned to look like humans to a point so they could walk among them before the war because they evolved from plants zinns species communicates by telepathy and scent glands mainly but they have produced translation collars and chips techbiologically inclined tech plant based though they do have lasers translation collars and chips bioshe is a medical professional and was brought to the planet as the war began top preserve who they could for study and becoming a part of there planet and culture char sheet skeleton name race appearance racial traits tech bio ok i hope people join i left it open so you can play human or make your own race and join in the fight pleas post more than three sentences and be detailed and have fun with it
Thread: the structure of space

Moved character sheet here !-- l --a classpostlink-local href l -- ----------- before i reply, I'd like clerification if my character is alright and if there's a war going on before i do. just making sure.
Thread: the structure of space

!-- l --a classpostlink-local href l -- ------------------- I would also like to use my character from this reply, if it is ok tell me. -D
Thread: the structure of space

sure welcome aboard
Thread: Heroes and villains

Here i wanted to do somethign interrelation if you could make a hero or be one or be a villain what powers woudl you choose what class would if fit into and .well what would you do with that power take over the world ,make peace,.Anyways just have fun here be creative .Just have fun talking about it and please no snide remarks . What i would choose woudl be between shape shifting and the production of raw power from the body both would probably all into the class and they woudl most likely be villains but i would always want to have a hero or be one without powers more because it takes more to work with but just opinion i still like a good power.
Thread: Heroes and villains

I would be able to control mother nature...talking to animals, controlling the weather, controlling the animals, control over all that stuff. Most likely I'd use it to take over the world....I'm evil like that. XD Well maybe not the world....just a certain place...of peace for myself and anyone else who wanted a change. So I guess you could say I would be neutral, doing good and bad. I would have my own class of awesomeness being the cock narcissistic bastard I am at times. XD
Thread: Heroes and villains

ha nice i hear you its much easier to be neutral a rouge doesn't have to make certain decisions because of what side there on .If you are evil they expect you to kill and mame to keep your lackeys in line. If your good they expect you to obey every lay and then some and save every one or try its much easier to be your own class.
Thread: Heroes and villains

I'd love to have mind-control related powers. And with that I'd obviously be more of a villain. D A Lot would work out be easier to do with the ability to control or manipulate the mind of people.
Thread: Heroes and villains

You rang? Hmm...Well interestingly enough I'd love the ability to call upon comic book heroes with a thought and take on their super powers. But since that's silly and waaaaay too over powered. I'm gonna have to go with super speed a la Flash, good heavens yes. Obviously I'd be a hero. Crime doesn't pay and you'll never control the world.
Thread: Heroes and villains

eternal youth.... I could still die if I got hit by a car or something, or choked on a steak..... lol
Thread: Heroes and villains

I would probably fall into the anti hero category, and my powers would be those of a flightless kryptonian.
Thread: Heroes and villains

as a villain id say id want to have the telekinetic powers and be able to you know physically produce things threw similar means of teleportation.
Thread: Heroes and villains

I would relinquish all to possess even a tenth of the power of Azathoth.
Thread: Heroes and villains

I would be a large group of undead. Clearly, I would be a hero.
Thread: Heroes and villains

I would go with mind control. Only because I don't like other people much. I don't think I'd be a hero or a villain. I'd probably just go about life a little easier being me. Maybe do something bad once in a while.
Thread: Heroes and villains

Everyone wants to be me.
Thread: Power?

youtube Old spice Odor Blocker Bodywash is so powerful it can block B.O. for sixteen hours! It's blocking power's as powerful as me! Yeah it is. Who said that...? Was it my left bicep? No... it was my... Aaaaaaaaaaaabdominals! Whistles Odor Blocker Bodywash is too powerful to let this commercial end! Block! Building kick! Explosioooooooon!!!!!! P-p-p-p-p-p-POWER!!!
Thread: Power?

Trs amusant! Now those are muscles! The one I've been laughing at recently is this Old Spice commercial, youtube While I find the commercials funny, I also find Old Spice about the un-sexiest aftershavebody lotion a man can wear. My dad wears Old Spice and whenever I have had a boyfriend who wears that scent, I make him change it. Jai
Thread: Power?

I agree, Old Spice is a particularly old fashioned smell, and not many people like it. I'm particular to Axe myself... but it all depends on the person. Old spice has the most hilarious commercials in my opinion.
Thread: Power?

Hehe. I should have made that clear. Old Spice commercials are knock me on the floor funny. Great stuff.
Thread: Power?

lol yeah. I realized what you meant. Very great... very noteworthy.
Thread: Power?

The commercials are funny, but the smell is antiquated. Now, if you were into much older men, it might be hot... But as for a smell that is attractive on men? Give me the BO. I want to know what he smells like dirty. That's when men smell the best. Mmmm... hormones.
Thread: This looks like the end.

Due to a lot of stuff that's been going on with my life and a few other things, I think it's time for me to finally throw in my last card. I can't roleplay as much as I'd like, so it's not fair to people here that I've started things with. I love the roleplays that were started, and I hate having to walk away from such great people and writing,But I'm done. Done with roleplaying for awhile and done with BM.From what I've seen there are a lot of great people here and I'm glad I got to meet and see such, but I don't have the time, energy or patience anymore. So, Goodbye everyone, This is just a courtesy note for those I played with and met. It's the least I can do since I'm leaving the board.
Thread: Why Greater Equality Makes Societies Stronger

youtube Link to website in video The slides in the video Lest I be conferred as making unsubstantiated claims in the Health Care thread. This is a very enlightening video - not that the results will be surprising to any progressive or liberal - but having it verified and even expanded upon in terms of raw data is quite useful. The impact on crime, health, and even the creativity of a nation is directly related to its income equality.
Thread: Why Greater Equality Makes Societies Stronger

In my sociology class last year, we talked about inequality and why it is important to keep society together and constitute progress. Utopian ideals can never work because there have to be people that have more power, more money, more something than everyone else. Without inequality, there wouldn't be programs that we have today such as charity, fundraisers, things of that nature. There wouldn't be different fashion trends and things of that like because everyone would be equal. Inequality keeps the social structures intact but allows room for expansion into a higher semblance of equality. But without inequality, there wouldn't be progress like there is and was.
Thread: Why Greater Equality Makes Societies Stronger

Hahvy, I must say I disagree. Hahvy said Utopian ideals can never work because there have to be people that have more power, more money, more something than everyone else. Click to expand... I don't think Utopian ideals can work either but that's not because there need to be haves and have-nots. I think that Utopian societies fail because of the human factor. Namely, people are greedy, weak willed and completely willing to betray one another. Hahvy said Without inequality, there wouldn't be programs that we have today such as charity, fundraisers, things of that nature. Click to expand... Without inequality we wouldn't need most charities or fundraisers. However, I think they would still have to be there, because there are unforeseeable times of extra duress. For instance, the BP spill. Nobody saw that one coming. Even in a perfect world--where it wouldn't happen because somehow magically the people don't suck--if it happened there would need to be extra output of effort to tackle the problem. Hahvy said There wouldn't be different fashion trends and things of that like because everyone would be equal. Click to expand... I don't think everyone being equal equates total conformity, or even slight conformity. I think that if everyone was equal there would be more styles, fashions, lifestyles. Imagine all the people who have great talent with fashion but were born into poverty or an area stricken with famine 'n shit. Or those who are too preoccupied with working their shitty jobs to care for their kids to indulge that creativity. Hahvy said Inequality keeps the social structures intact but allows room for expansion into a higher semblance of equality. Click to expand... It seems like you're saying inequality is good because it perpetuates itself culminating in a greater level of equality. I don't really see that happening. I think it's a little funny that the top one percent is making upwards of 20 of all the money. Hahvy said But without inequality, there wouldn't be progress like there is and was. Click to expand... I disagree. If you mean progress in the sense of science, then that is incorrect because of, again, all those brilliant minds deprived of the opportunity to exercise them due to worry about food, clean water and medicine. If you mean progress in a social sense then, yeah, there wouldn't be progress because we would have hit the end goal. What progress is there once you've won?
Thread: Why Greater Equality Makes Societies Stronger

Within a society there will always be have and have-nots because even in a Utopian society, someone has to be the leader which makes inequality. In communist countries, which have this same equal-opportunity not everyone is equal no matter what they say. I agree with what you say about people being greedy and such of that nature. With the fashion aspect, I don't really think so. Because people would demand they have the same things, be given those same things because everything is to be equal amongst themselves. If someone in that society suddenly had a feathered hat for example, everyone would want that feathered hat because they were entitled to it due to the equality of their stations. Why do you think the Industrial Revolution came about? To make things easier for people and to produce more of this and that. Science shot forward because there were people who wanted to make it easier for people of lesser stations to progress and gain higher footings in society. Progress is to make things easier for everyone- and it's fueled by necessity as well as well, this would make this easier to do! And there isn't such thing as equality just in human society either. I agree on some of the points you made, but not all of them.
Thread: Why Greater Equality Makes Societies Stronger

I don't think constantly striving for perfection would be healthy for any society. A constant That's not good enough! would really destroy anyone's morale after a while.
Thread: Why Greater Equality Makes Societies Stronger

Huh. That class sounds amazingly awesome if I'd like not to feel guilty about being part of the haves. Man, that is a deceptively beautiful answer. It gets rid of all the guilt and, not only that, makes you part of the solutionimprovement of the human race. Damn. Whoever thought of that is bloody clever.
Thread: Why Greater Equality Makes Societies Stronger

Equality is about all human beings having the same opportunities available to them, not about everyone being the same. --Hahvoc Requiem-- said Inequality keeps the social structures intact but allows room for expansion into a higher semblance of equality. But without inequality, there wouldn't be progress like there is and was. Click to expand... That almost made me cry. Inequality is a driving force behind social tensions, not progress. Events like the Russian Revolution, rise of Nazism, communism in China... All came to pass because the problems in those societies made the previous social structure unstable - and inequality was part of it. Frustration that people did not have the same opportunities, frustration at the moneyed leisure classes, at the military elites that drove social policy that was not for the good of the people. So yes, inequality is a driving force. If you like your progress bloody. On the other had, let us consider Finland, one of the countries with the lowest inequality score in the world. It's rarely in the news, but that does not mean nothing happens there. You can't accuse it of not being progressive, because it has given us a company like Nokia. Finland also ranks very highly on the human development index, and has one of the highest standards of living in the world. The social problem that inequality causes is discotent from a large proportion of the population. This can never be ranked as a social good, however you put it.
Thread: Why Greater Equality Makes Societies Stronger

missedstations said Equality is about all human beings having the same opportunities available to them, not about everyone being the same. Click to expand... Yes, I understand that. But when you make a society into a Utopian ideal then everyone is the same as everyone else in very much that way. --Hahvoc Requiem-- said Inequality keeps the social structures intact but allows room for expansion into a higher semblance of equality. But without inequality, there wouldn't be progress like there is and was. Click to expand... missedstations said Inequality is a driving force behind social tensions, not progress. Events like the Russian Revolution, rise of Nazism, communism in China... All came to pass because the problems in those societies made the previous social structure unstable - and inequality was part of it. Frustration that people did not have the same opportunities, frustration at the moneyed leisure classes, at the military elites that drove social policy that was not for the good of the people. So yes, inequality is a driving force. If you like your progress bloody. Click to expand... In cases such as that, the inequality amongst the social classes expanded way beyond normal limits and allowed instability and an uprising- which I get. I'm not saying that inequality to such a degree is good, but in societies that expand and grow in a healthy manner is. So let me put it this way Would you be a janitor? No, right? Because of social inequalities we have jobs for people who would be what some would consider a lowly janitor because it's a job they can do and still get paid decently because otherwise they would be SOL due to limited education, mental ability, and so on. Most kids nowadays think they have a right to any job they want simply because of their stations in life. Wrong. Self-entitlement is bullshit. But with the inequality amongst classes, it allows for jobs for people who were born into a lower station to gain enough money to live and do jobs that most people wouldn't do. So how is that a bad thing? I don't see it as one. And if I recall correctly, inequality amongst the classes brought about public schools, scholarships, after school programs, day-care services, and things of that nature to help lessen the load on the little guy and make things more...what's the word? Equal. So yes, I think inequality has it's place in society but not to outlandish degrees. There will always be inequality and that's how it is. If there weren't programs focusing on helping care for the mentally unstable and all those other poor sods, they would be dead. But it also allows people to be more equal in society even with those mental disabilities.
Thread: Why Greater Equality Makes Societies Stronger

I believe that like with anything else, moderation is of prime importance. Striving for greater equality is a good concept and a good goal, but it's possible to take it too far and turn it into the enemy of progress. When it reaches the point of intentionally handicapping those at the top simply for the sake of equality, we've crossed a line that shouldn't be crossed. The goal should always be to improve the lot of those without, not to knock down those with. A few examples include schools that refuse to accelerate the best students because it would make students of less ability feel bad about themselves forbidding competitive activities because it hurts not to win setting aside tax-based scholarship funds for those with characteristics other than need and merit such as gender, race, etc. and creating laws for mandatory disabled access that are so extreme that they make it difficult for small companies to stay profitable. In those instances, we would be better served by working to improve classroom quality for the struggling students and give them more options for assistance while letting the best rise as high as they can creating different kinds of activities so that those who are less athletically or academically inclined can find something they excel at making payouts blind to any characteristic other than need and merit if those of certain races are genuinely disadvantaged and women need more help, which is often the case, then they will qualify for this assistance in higher percentages but it will be fair, and allowing more temporary exceptions and modifications to ADA laws for start-up and small businesses while leaving them in place for those making enough money that adding extra bathroom stalls and parking spaces etc. won't make them go under. Equality is only good as far as it serves society. When it becomes a god in and of itself, the greater good be damned, we're in trouble.
Thread: Why Greater Equality Makes Societies Stronger

Cassia, those are awesome ideas, but there's only one thing from keeping all of that coming true. Effort. Most Americans seem like they're allergic to it.
Thread: Why Greater Equality Makes Societies Stronger

No, that's not even what I was saying. Obviously, polio isn't good. But fact is there is inequality. Without conflict there can't be progress. Considering how large a scale inequality was 50-60 years ago, we've come pretty far. I want people to have fresh water, food, and shelter. But the world doesn't work the way I want it and there is only so much that can be made equal amongst society. If I could find my sociology book, I would put in quotes and cite it, but it's somewhere in the recesses of my car. With Utopian ideals there isn't conflict because everyone is the same. It slows down progress and comes to a stand still because there wouldn't be need for improvement since everyone would be content with whatever they would be given. Which is false because of human nature. It would fall apart and drop into chaos and be completely unstable. And what you said is like saying if people could keep it in their pants until marriage, there wouldn't be a need for condoms and there wouldn't be teen pregnancy. Inequality is good in moderation as it breeds need for improvement. If everyone had the same as everyone else, why would there be need for improvement? There wouldn't be. It can't be maintained and that is how inequality is good. It also brings about compassion for people who are less fortunate because why would you have compassion for someone in the same situation as yourself?
Thread: Why Greater Equality Makes Societies Stronger

--Hahvoc Requiem-- said No, that's not even what I was saying. Obviously, polio isn't good. But fact is there is inequality. Without conflict there can't be progress. Considering how large a scale inequality was 50-60 years ago, we've come pretty far. Click to expand... . Actually, in this country, we're reaching a gap between the rich and the poor we haven't had for about a hundred years. So, fifty, sixty years ago, we were actually doing better. Curious, though, that progress seems to be based on having the numbers and complexity to have a specialist class that doesn't have to make it's own food. But that's the same thing as inequality, rite? Rite? I want people to have fresh water, food, and shelter. But the world doesn't work the way I want it and there is only so much that can be made equal amongst society. If I could find my sociology book, I would put in quotes and cite it, but it's somewhere in the recesses of my car. Click to expand... You could try being poor. I mean, since we need a certain number of poor folks, give your stuff away and try from the beginning. See how well that works for you. With Utopian ideals there isn't conflict because everyone is the same. It slows down progress and comes to a stand still because there wouldn't be need for improvement since everyone would be content with whatever they would be given. Which is false because of human nature. It would fall apart and drop into chaos and be completely unstable. Click to expand... Hrmmm. This sounds a lot like a slippery slope. Why can't utopia simply mean that more people are free from constantly worrying about their basic needs so they can work on, say, science or art? Inequality is good in moderation as it breeds need for improvement. If everyone had the same as everyone else, why would there be need for improvement? There wouldn't be. It can't be maintained and that is how inequality is good. It also brings about compassion for people who are less fortunate because why would you have compassion for someone in the same situation as yourself? Click to expand... It also helps you feel really, really good about yourself because, c'mon, your life doesn't suck balls like theirs, amirite? Because of all the work you did improving yourself, like being born to good parents.