Whitzz/544K-RP-Datasets huggingface dataset:
Thread: Blood Toy- Google and Weaver

Charlotte, or Charlie as most people knew her, glared at the dark sky and cursed the fact that she hadn't brought either a rain coat or an umbrella with her. The forecast had been for clear skies and a mild night, but she should have known better than to trust the damn forecast in the first place. Now, instead of enjoying a mild early fall evening, she stood, shivering in the increasingly heavy rain, waiting for the bus. She wrapped her arms about her body as the now soaked through blouse clung to her full breasts, nipples pebbled within the scant protection of the cups of her bra. Her black skirt hung heavy about her thighs, plastered to her legs as she rubbed her arms and hoped, for once, that the bus would be on time. But even as she glanced at her watch she knew it was a foolish hope. So, there she stood, her long red hair bound up in a braid that kept it away from her face, her formal golf club waitress uniform now sopping wet, and no sign of the bus. Not even a shelter, or a tree. Fine, she couldn't make one appear out of nowhere. Cursing wouldn't change that and she had to find a way to keep the chill from sinking even deeper into her bones. So, with a growl she turned and began to pace, rubbing her arms with near numb hands
Thread: Blood Toy- Google and Weaver

He knew that all black with a long black leather jacket was a freakishly clich thing for a vampire to be wearing but that didn't bother Vincent at all. In fact he stuck with the old stuff because he liked them, long black hair that feel to his shoulders, pale skin with what could be called regal features and piercing blue eyes... up until the last century people had figured out what he was quite quickly but since the start of the twentieth century people had forgotten what he was and no one even guessed that he was a vampire rather then just someone who enjoyed wearing a great deal of black and giving off an odd vibe. He was new in town, and he needed a new pet. Unlike most vampires Vincent wasn't fond of just hunting and killing with every meal, that was how one got hunters on their trail and that was the last thing that he wanted... he preferred to stay in one place for as long as he could, keeping a single thing to play with the entire time that he was there. Keep them alive and play with them, because a meal was so much more satisfying when one knew how to enjoy it completely. As he drove through the streets slowly he looked around, the classic muscle car he used growling as it made its way around. The window rolled down allowed him to hunt with scent but the rain dampened it... however he still found her, it appeared she was waiting for a bus but none appeared to be nearby. You look like you could use a ride. He said with a smile as he pulled up next to her.
Thread: Blood Toy- Google and Weaver

Charlie blinked against the rain as she turned toward the car. The heavy rain clung to her long lashes, shielding her emerald eyes to some extent but even then she found it difficult to see in the growing storm. Did she know the car? She paused for a moment before answering the man, all too well aware that the longer she stood out here the colder she would become. But even with that in mind she wasn't about to do something foolish. Thanks, but no thanks. No offense, but I don't know you. She flashed an apologetic smile at the driver and caught a full look at him when the rain eased for a moment. Handsome, yes, but not in the way that they portrayed in movies, he was too pale for that. Not that it mattered, she still didn't know him from Adam. Hopefully that bus will be here soon. She shivered as the clouds re-opened with a vengeance and she looked up, glaring at the sky. Just what had she done to deserve this? She'd need a long, hot soak in the tub, and a good glass of wine, or something stronger, to defeat the cold when she did make it home. Even then she'd be fighting a chill that could leave her miserable by tomorrow morning.
Thread: Blood Toy- Google and Weaver

She had more brains then he thought she would, he had figured someone dumb enough to be standing out in the cold like she was would be more then dumb enough to get into a car with a total stranger. Pity she hadn't done it the easy but Vincent really didn't mind, he would have fun with this one. There was no one around to see him hunting her, this time of night the bus not even be coming which would just make her the victim for someone else sooner or later. Sometimes the hard way was much more fun then the easy way. Pulling ahead a little bit he moved the car to the shoulder of the road and slowly climbed out of it, stretching a little bit as he did just to seem a tad more intimidating. With a smirk crossing his features and showing his fangs a little bit he began to approach her, taking his time as he did. Really you are going to be getting in the car with me pet. He said with a small chuckle as he drew closer to her, soon he would just grab her and drag her into the car with him. If you do it willingly then I wont hurt you as much as I will if you try to run from me.
Thread: Blood Toy- Google and Weaver

Charlie looked up the street for any sign of the bus, then glanced back in the direction the car had gone. It was still there. For a moment she tried to squash the panic that flared into life, but all attempts failed as the man got out of the car and walked toward her. Instinctively she took a step back, and her heart threatened to block her throat as he flashed fangs and spoke. Fangs! Not possible! But there was no denying what she'd seen, or the threat he uttered. Pet, she was no man's pet. It just wasn't happening. The fangs had to be fake. Some sick idea of a joke, that was it. Vampires weren't real, everyone knew that She took three steps back, shaking her head as she moved. Look, I don't know what you're playing at but I'm not getting in that car with you. Not now. Not ever. One hand moved toward her purse to find the pepper spray she carried. She'd spray him and run, then report that bastard to the cops. But for that she'd need his license plate number and that's when she made the mistake of taking her gaze away from the man to look at the car again
Thread: The human centipede (first sequence)

I was watching the scream awards and there was a winner that really intrigued me. Is the winner for 'The most memorable mutilation' and this movie won. I was wondering who saw this movie and if it's good so I can look for it, I kinda find interesting the way the doctors attached each other, kinda gross but also make me want to watch the movie hehe
Thread: The human centipede (first sequence)

Wow, did this movie seriously won most memorable mutilation? From what I can recall, the gore in it is quite minimal, to a point where it gets disappointing. I'm now suddenly curious to see what were the other contestants. Yes, the whole idea of the Human Centipede is genuinely awesome, but that's pretty much what the movie is, a great idea. It's still somewhat enjoyable as campy fun if you have low standards for horror like I do, but it's pretty much impossible to finish watching it and not shrug off that oh well, they could've done a lot more with this concept feeling. A shame, if you ask me.
Thread: The human centipede (first sequence)

I was rooting for Saw 6 to win most memorable mutilation ... 'twas rather gruesome, that one scene. It was an original movie. But it has nothing on The Antichrist.
Thread: The human centipede (first sequence)

My friend had a nightmare the night he saw the trailer for the first movie. He showed me it and I was just like, ... the fuck. The idea is interesting and disgusting. I'd see it, yeah, but I'm not sure how much I'd enjoy it, lulz.
Thread: The human centipede (first sequence)

A week or so ago, I showed the DVD to my hubs bc I thought it might be an interesting horror flick to see. I handed it to him and told him to read the back. Afterward, he just looked at me like I was insane and said something like, This is sick shit. What the fuck! hehe... my hubs loves me so. XD
Thread: The human centipede (first sequence)

I have a really strange need to see the film, as gross as it looks. I don't even know what it is about the fact that the man in it is so psycho that he felt the need to create a human centipede, or the fact that he did it with a dog first and it's also so totally gross but I wanna see it.
Thread: The human centipede (first sequence)

I watched it and enjoyed it. It's definitely not one for the faint hearted or weak minded as even though the gore itself might be minimal the idea around it can be pretty disturbing. I'm not sure if I saw an uncut version or anything but there were parts where you visibly saw the results of the surgery and you saw when certain other bits happened. I would watch if you liked the Saw series.
Thread: The human centipede (first sequence)

I really liked the movie The ending was horrifying D Supposedly, the next one is supposed to be even worse. I am excited
Thread: The human centipede (first sequence)

Aren't they getting like, twelve people for the next one?
Thread: The human centipede (first sequence)

Yes, there is supposed to be 12 people
Thread: The human centipede (first sequence)

Kinda creeps me out even more. It was bad enough with three people. Just the thought of someone actually doing that... ughh.
Thread: The human centipede (first sequence)

It is pretty terrifying. The psychological trauma these people go through is amazing. SPOILER It sucked for the girl in the middle C Her friend died behind her and the Asian in the front killed himself so she was left alone and unable to move. C
Thread: Christian Rock Music

Well I am a really huge fan of music, I find in music a way to get out of reality and embrace another world. A couple of years ago I was turned from being a person who heard a lot of satanic and heavy metal music like MM and Ozzy. Now I hear Demon Hunter and a few others christian rock music. Now my question is, what is your opinion of christian Rock music. If you still don't believe that is possible I beg you to watch this.... Now I ask, what is your opinion about christian rock
Thread: Christian Rock Music

. There is nothing with Christian Rock. At all. Creed is probably the most famous of most christan rock band. I've gone to a Christain Rock concert. Some of them are epic, some of them epic fail P I think by far my favorites are Skillet Three Days Grace feel to them, and Fireflight. Cause. Chick bands rule
Thread: Christian Rock Music

Believe it or not Demon Hunter falls into christian rock. I also like spanish group WarCry
Thread: Christian Rock Music

I have been listeing to a lot of Christian rock for a while, and really like most of it. Definitely agree with you about Skillet, Demon Hunter, and Fireflight. The Almost are another good group to check out. While there are some bands that aren't all that good, the same can be said for any other genre of music. Based on all that I have listened to, the majority of the bands out there are really quite good.
Thread: Christian Rock Music

There's decent bands. There's also bands that sell records just because they put 'christian' in their genre. Personally, I'm a little bit leery of any band that has one overarching message in every song, with the exception of, say, The Protomen, which is a rock opera project and therefore cohesive. It just seems unnecessarily limiting. They're religious, okay - Do they have anything ELSE to talk about?
Thread: Christian Rock Music

SKILLET IS NOT A GIRL BAND. 8 As I Lay Dying is a Christian Metal Band So is Flyleaf
Thread: Christian Rock Music

i guess Sleeping Giants, is a christian band
Thread: Christian Rock Music

--Hahvoc Requiem-- said SKILLET IS NOT A GIRL BAND. 8 Click to expand... I think she meant Fireflight, hahvy. I've been in the Christian rock music scene before. We used to have festivals and concerts through my youth group. I like a lot of the bands mentioned. Switchfoot was sorta in that category for a bit, but I don't think they are anymore. There is also- The Devil Wears Prada Family Force 5 Children 183 Mercy Me Jars of Clay Though these last two are very, very christian, meaning most of their songs are worship type songs.
Thread: Christian Rock Music

I don't mind if a rock band is made up of christians but I have a button on my leather jacket that I think sums it all up for my tastes.
Thread: Christian Rock Music

FlyLeaf is awesome
Thread: Christian Rock Music

I've always been a big fan of the Christian Rock Bands. I usually prefer Skillet, Relient K, The Classic Crime, I Am Terrified, things like that. I feel like with Christian Rock you don't only get a good influence in the music, but it's also something to just bang your head or dance to. Not to mention some of the best bands are in this genre.
Thread: Christian Rock Music

I couldn't get into it. Every now and then I'll find an inspirational song that I like but as a genre Christian Rock just isn't my thing.
Thread: Literacy and Promptness is Appreciated

Hi! I just wanted to say I like the idea's you've thrown out there and I'd be interested in seeing what we can make of it. I'm new to this so I may be a little shaky here and there but I'd love the chance to prove myself. I particularly like the School RP idea and would be interested in trying it either way i.e. male studentfemale teacher or female student male teacher. But I also like the idea of the aggressive relationship because I think it would make for a fun challenge. Let me know if you're interested in giving it a shot. Hope to talk to you soon. Oh, and an important note regarding promptness I do this from word so I'm primarily active on here from 9-5 eastern U.S. Mon-Fri. but that doesn't mean I won't check in from time to time elsewhere. Its just my most reliable time.
Thread: Literacy and Promptness is Appreciated

bump .. .
Thread: Literacy and Promptness is Appreciated

BUMP sleepy
Thread: Literacy and Promptness is Appreciated

Bumpity Bump.
Thread: Literacy and Promptness is Appreciated

Bump Bump Boredom
Thread: Literacy and Promptness is Appreciated

Word of the Day. B-U-M-P
Thread: Genetic Therapy in Utero: Good idea or bad idea?

So. Let's suppose, for the sake of argument, that you or someone you love is about a month pregnant. A test has revealed that, if born, the child will have a genetic disorder. It's not a lethal disease when treated properly, and it's unlikely to cause a mental disorder of any kind, but it will cause significant problems for the child if allowed to occur. A genetic therapy has been shown unlike current genetic therapies to be effective and low-risk. It would alter the embryo's DNA to supply a healthy copy of the disease gene in a safe manner. Given this, would you use the therapy to treat the embryo? What if there were no embryo yet, but you could treat your own spermeggs to fix the problem prior to conception? Would this change your answer? Conversely, what if the pregnancy had gone far enough for the embryo to develop into a fetus? What if the disease were lethal? Not lethal, but producing a condition generally recognized as a psychological illness? I'd, personally, be absolutely willing to tamper with my own sperm, and probably willing to act to modify an existing fetus if the disease were severe enough. But I'd draw the line at altering a fetus for reasons of aesthetics or personal preference, and I'd be especially wary about trying to treat, say, obsessive-compulsive disorder in the womb. Thoughts?
Thread: Genetic Therapy in Utero: Good idea or bad idea?

I'm not opposed to corrective gene therapy. Replacing damaged genes with healthy genes eliminates a flaw, and that's OK. It's enhancements that are the problem. It's like my thought on geneneered foods enhancing, say, corn stock with stronger corn genes is just accelerating what you can do with traditional methods, and I'm in support of efficiency. Putting in fish genes or insecticide genes into corn stock is a step beyond, and the ramifications can't be predicted quite so well.
Thread: Genetic Therapy in Utero: Good idea or bad idea?

I would not mind enhancements if everyone was given them. Sure, it'd make a lot of older people upset but so long as everyone is getting the same treatment I'd not be concerned beyond possible ramifications as MM puts it. Of course by the time we're to the point of enhancing humans I'd like to think that most, if not all, of the kinks had been worked out of the system. Sadly biology doesn't work that simple.
Thread: Genetic Therapy in Utero: Good idea or bad idea?

Biology is hardly simple and tweaking small things such as a single protein, or even a fragment, isn't all that easy and often times results in strange mutations. Some of which are all right and are thus 'silent', but some radically change the properties and thus how they work. So, imagine working with the human genome which is MUCH MUCH MUCH bigger. OH MY! However, if we are ever at that point of understanding things, I'm all right with certain sorts of gene therapy. Ones that won't leave lingering issues down the line with that particular individual or even in the next generation assuming the individual who received the gene therapy reproduces. I'm definitely more comfortable using such therapies for fixing genetic defects as opposed to enhancements or basic appearance tweaks. Such things are unnecessary and meddling with genetics is tricky business. Best to only go there when it's needed.
Thread: Genetic Therapy in Utero: Good idea or bad idea?

Better Worse Always. In all senses.
Thread: Genetic Therapy in Utero: Good idea or bad idea?

I would not mind enhancements if everyone was given them. Sure, it'd make a lot of older people upset but so long as everyone is getting the same treatment I'd not be concerned beyond possible ramifications as MM puts it. Of course by the time we're to the point of enhancing humans I'd like to think that most, if not all, of the kinks had been worked out of the system. Sadly biology doesn't work that simple. Click to expand... The potential problem is that nature has already selected for a pretty effective genome. What if some things we perceive as weaknesses are actually useful? The classic case is the mutation that causes sickle-cell anemia. If you have two mutant copies, your health suffers - a lot. But if you have only one mutant copy, your resistance to malaria is increased. Biology is hardly simple and tweaking small things such as a single protein, or even a fragment, isn't all that easy and often times results in strange mutations. Click to expand... This is why I said that the therapy would introduce a working copy of the gene, rather than tweak the copy that is already there. In other words, nothing would be removed the alteration would be adding one new transgene. I think a lot of people draw the line at improving subjects beyond curing diseases, because of the potential for abuse.
Thread: Genetic Therapy in Utero: Good idea or bad idea?

When I think of this subject I think of the film Gattaca, which is a great film and anyone interested in gene enhancement should watch it, and so I was basing it around that concept of designer babies.
Thread: Genetic Therapy in Utero: Good idea or bad idea?

You know how humans are. Once a thing CAN be done, you can bet it WILL be done. And someone will make a great profit from it.
Thread: Genetic Therapy in Utero: Good idea or bad idea?

Again things it's not supposed to do is not jump-starting nature, it's more twiddling to make it do new tricks. That's like grafting in fish genes. Things like this is why the unwashed hoi polloi doesn't trust scientists. But things like this aren't propelled by scientists. Scientists did the three-sample testing. It's business and politics that only requires the sterile soil sample test streamlines approval and lets companies get their products out faster and cheaper. Bet millions of dollars in lobbyist money went into that particular rule, and companies have saved trillions of dollars because of it. So what if we've nearly died because of it? Blame it on the science.
Thread: Genetic Therapy in Utero: Good idea or bad idea?

It's definitely not the scientists. We do the appropriate experiments and the like to seek answers and truths. To look for new questions and so on. We report accordingly and what happens after that isn't our say. Most of us get upset when our findings get disregarded or pushed to the side. Nowadays, that doesn't happen as much. But when it does... yeah. Take from me. A 'used-to-be' scientist who's worked both in biopharma and biotech.
Thread: Genetic Therapy in Utero: Good idea or bad idea?

darkangel76 said It's definitely not the scientists. We do the appropriate experiments and the like to seek answers and truths. To look for new questions and so on. We report accordingly and what happens after that isn't our say. Most of us get upset when our findings get disregarded or pushed to the side. Nowadays, that doesn't happen as much. But when it does... yeah. Take from me. A 'used-to-be' scientist who's worked both in biopharma and biotech. Click to expand... I know! It's unfair, isn't it? Most scientists I've talked to would rather test and double-check and find things out. But they're not the ones writing the checks or demanding results.
Thread: Genetic Therapy in Utero: Good idea or bad idea?

Mr Master said darkangel76 said It's definitely not the scientists. We do the appropriate experiments and the like to seek answers and truths. To look for new questions and so on. We report accordingly and what happens after that isn't our say. Most of us get upset when our findings get disregarded or pushed to the side. Nowadays, that doesn't happen as much. But when it does... yeah. Take from me. A 'used-to-be' scientist who's worked both in biopharma and biotech. Click to expand... I know! It's unfair, isn't it? Most scientists I've talked to would rather test and double-check and find things out. But they're not the ones writing the checks or demanding results. Click to expand... It very much so is unfair. We could care less about the marketing and distribution of the end product. Our concern is learning the truths of what we're studyingdeveloping. If we had our way, it would probably take double the time it takes to get FDA approval. But nowadays, there are some pretty stringent guidelines that go with human trials and eventual public distribution of medications and the like. There was a time when it wasn't as strict, definitely before my time as a scientist. Though, having worked in biopharma, I can say that the company tends to push distribution and such pretty hard. Even to a point where the scientists suffer. It's absolutely ridiculous. But anyway, in the end, most of the problems that occur such as those are not a direct result of the science nor of the people doing the science. You can blame the power hungry higher-ups as that's really who is at fault. At least, in my opinion and from my own experiences. But again.... such things are not nearly as frequent due to the potential law suits that can and will occur, not to mention the poor reputation that will follow the company as a result of everything. People need to recall the semi-recent issues that happened with several of Pfizer's drugs. About 5 - 10 years ago they had massive recalls. As a result, the FDA stepped in and not only recalled the drugs, but slapped Pfizer pretty hard making many lose faith in them and look down on them for quite a bit. Plus, they ie, the FDA made their guidelines much much tougher in regards to getting to the point where human trials are deemed acceptable. And nowadays, human trials are taking much longer to complete as well so as to better determine long-term resultseffects and long-term typically means 10 - 20 years, at least in most cases. Again, a result of the FDA's stringency on guidelines prior to mass distribution to the public. All of these rules and such by the FDA are great in my opinion. And needed. I think it places companies in check, meaning those who are geared toward distributing a product meant for human use that may or may not cause risks. Of course, some risks are going to be there. But they should be minimal and rare. But that's a side point really.