Whitzz/544K-RP-Datasets huggingface dataset:
Thread: The Tavern - Character Profiles - Now Accepting

No worries! I'm headed to the RP now
Thread: The Tavern - Character Profiles - Now Accepting

Owner Kaybee Character Name Shannae Age 116 Gender Female Appearance Spoiler tagged due to image size. Species Elf Orientation Pansexual, Happy to service and be serviced by men, women, tentacle monsters, slimes, just about anyone that walks through the door really. Extra Info Works as one of the serving maids, complete with uniform.
Thread: The Tavern - Character Profiles - Now Accepting

Great bee, welcome to the Tavern!
Thread: The Tavern - Character Profiles - Now Accepting

Owner Pillsbury Character Name Erndras Garronson Age 25 in human years Gender Male Appearance Species Elf Orientation Heterosexual Extra Info A dashing Elf Prince who can pick up any woman in his path.
Thread: The Tavern - Character Profiles - Now Accepting

Great Pillsbury! Welcome to the Tavern!
Thread: The Tavern - Character Profiles - Now Accepting

OwnerLuatesh Character NameKeshka Age 5430 looks 18-21 GenderFemale Appearancespirit form Click Here human form click here animal form CLick Here SpeciesKitsune spirit Orientation BI Extra InfoHas been the owner of the land before the Tavern was built not complaining about a warm place to sleep she let the place be built sleeps in the dark area of the rafter of the Tavern so can only be seen she she decides to come down or playing a prank on one of the male customers or is lonely and wants some company. modified 3172012 - added human form and animal form pics
Thread: The Tavern - Character Profiles - Now Accepting

Love it, welcome to the Tavern!
Thread: The Tavern - Character Profiles - Now Accepting

Owner FoxyKyoko Character Name Kyoko Age 22 Gender Female Appearance Species Foxgirl Orientation Bi Extra Info A lone traveler that's in search of a place to stay for a while and enjoy herself. She spunky and doesn't hesitate when she knows what she wants!
Thread: The Tavern - Character Profiles - Now Accepting

Looks great Kyoko, welcome to the Tavern! Post whenever you're ready!
Thread: The Tavern - Character Profiles - Now Accepting

Owner TimeTraveler Character Name Aaron Jasons Age 18 Gender Female Appearance Species Human Orientation Bisexual Extra Info Aaron is a skilled fighter and without a doubt a tomboy. She hates it when people under-estamate her because she's a girl and can be rather hot-headed.
Thread: The Tavern - Character Profiles - Now Accepting

Owner Darrow Huck Character Name Thervan Age 231 Gender Male Appearance Species Dragon Orientation Heterosexual Extra Info Thervan has recently been drained of all his magic, and is trying to et it back so that he can return to his true form. I can't really find any pictures of what he looks like in his human form, but he's a tall man with golden eyes and long, voluminous black hair and teeth that are slightly noticeably sharp
Thread: The Tavern - Character Profiles - Now Accepting

Welcome to the RP! Post when you guys are ready!
Thread: The Tavern - Character Profiles - Now Accepting

Owner Ben Jackson Character Name Zalthro Age Must be 18 or older 18 Gender femal Appearance Must be a picture - Anime only Species neko Orientation bisexual Extra Info hates to admit it but loves to be treated like a pet and dominated and if you use cat toys she pretends to hate it but secretly can't resist them
Thread: The Tavern - Character Profiles - Now Accepting

Owner Ben Jackson Character Name Carver Falione Age Must be 18 or older 21 Gender male Appearance Must be a picture - Anime only human form Species werewolf Orientation heterosexual Extra Info
Thread: The Tavern - Character Profiles - Now Accepting

Welcome to the Tavern, post when you're ready!
Thread: The Tavern - Character Profiles - Now Accepting

do you need to give a link to the character profiles?
Thread: The Tavern - Character Profiles - Now Accepting

There is one in the top of the actual RP!
Thread: The Tavern - Character Profiles - Now Accepting

Owner razerwing Character Delshyk Trynttansa Age 22 Gender Male Appearance Of course the clothes will differ. Species Red fox anthromorph Orientation Bi-Curious Extra info He's geared for hunting, have all the animal senses and the grace of a fox, with the ability and thoughts of a human. But, being that he is a creature used to the long solitary journeys of a mercenary, he is somewhat inexperienced in awkward situations. Also, prone to blush in said instances.
Thread: The Tavern - Character Profiles - Now Accepting

Owner Lupa Hazelia Character Name Lupa Age 18 Gender Female Appearance Refer to profile pic Species Half-wolf Werewolf, mixed again with human. Orientation Heterosexual Extra Info Has been wandering villages for days before finding the tavern. Wearing laced up, strapless, black and red corset top red miniskirt. Sexually open with most men.
Thread: The Tavern OOC

This is where you'll want to be if you have any questions, comments, complaints, etc. about The Tavern! Back to The Tavern ...
Thread: The Tavern OOC

We are officially open!
Thread: Sappho Academy (refference page)

School Rules Dress Code School Uniform School uniforms compose of a yellow button down top or sweater, pleated mini skirt, tennis shoes and leg warmers. Tops can be sleeveless and short, but not reveal one's navel or cleavage, violation of this rule will result in a detention will the headmistress. the maximum length of a skirt is right above the knee, expected length is to be a mid thigh, if underwear is visible at eye level the skirt is too short and student must serve a detention with the headmistress. any students caution without bras or underwear in the classroom must serve detention with the headmistress PE Uniform Phys Ed uniforms comprise of with tops, t-shirts or tank tops, tennis shoes and short, tight fitting red or black bloomers. knee pads and gloves are provided depending on the activity. wearing tops tied off at mid waist and visible cleavage are acceptable in phys ed classes. Swim Team Uniform Swim team uniform consists of a one piece blue swim suit bearing school coat of arms for every official swim meet and completion. in students free time during open pool hours students are free to wear bikinis, one piece suits of any color. thong bikinis will result in detention with head mistress. Detentions Rule violations with result without detentions with the head mistress, the head mistress has full authority in deciding the terms of the detention and how best to discipline a student. Guests on Campus All visits must be approved of by the Head Mistress in advance. parents are allowed to make scheduled visits on weekends. Absolutely no boys on campus except for school dances. Students Behavior Each and every student is expected to respect her peers and fellow classmates with demure and etiquette. Jeering and bullying will not be tolerated on school grounds. Sexual harassment and other forms of lewd behavior will not be tolerated, if such acts are witnessed inform a member of the staff. Story Scenarios still under construction
Thread: Sappho Academy (refference page)

Character Creation Station character creation made easy Wouldn't that made a bad ass catch phrase? so for those who wish to create their own characters for a scenario their are ready to use pictures avalible and character skeletons to be filled out. Character Skeleton Students Name Race sexuality age Background TeachersStaff Name Race sexuality age OccupationTitle Background Character pictures Students Teacherstaff coming soon Story Scenarios still under construction 1. Waterlily Tryouts Fall Tryouts for the Waterlily swim team are begging, Clara aims to whip the new girls into shape quickly and show the girls what the Waterlilies are really made of. Miss Swee is keeping an eye on Clara's progress so Clara is being tougher than usual on the newer younger girls. However the team tryouts are being crashed by Ivy and her crew who are picking on the newer girls. Default Characters Waterlily Girls Clara Miss Swee Ivy Ivy's crew 2 custom thuggish female characters Waterlily Girls 3-5 students, can be either pre-made or custom students 2. Learning the Ropes Its Sune's first day at Sappho Academy. Its the First private school attended by this demure, but strong minded young lady. How will she fair in her first few classes? How will her fair agaisnt the school bully? How will she fair in her first detention with miss sayoko. This can be the first day of school for sune and one or two other girls, pre-made or custom feel free to decide which teachers you would like to play as. 3. Lonely Librarian Miss kai desperately wants to tell Miss Williams how she feels but as always is too afraid to admit it. during another lonely night working in the library one of her students who has crush on miss Kai visits her beautiful teacher for some private 'tutoring.' Will Miss kai be seduced by her own student? 4. Paying Back the Favor Miss Fare save's Suki from another detention with miss sayako, now Suki must return the favor.... 5. The Trojan horse the water lilies are training for an upcoming competition, most of the girl are pretty focused and training hard. however they do have their share of distraction. a group of local boys are gawking at the shapely wet beauties for affair, a few jeers and cat-calls causing the girl to blushed and become distracted. The boys get scolded by by the Water Lilies shapely coach, Clara. She tell them to leave or she will call for a teacher. the boys start to leave before the mysterious sassy Matilda slips out from behind a near by tree with a proposition for the local boys. some sex starved girls in the academy are desperately craving the attention boys and she offers to help smuggle boys into the school. will they trust this sly beauty on her offer or will they try to get into the academy via their own means? for these characters we will need people that can play at least up to four boys. some water lilies Clara, Matilda and few girls that will be waiting in the academy.
Thread: Sappho Academy (refference page)

Is this mostly yuri?
Thread: Sappho Academy (refference page)

mainly, through there is a field trip one with sune and a boy. or the gawkers outside the fence are snuk into the school to get at the sex starved girls....
Thread: Sappho Academy (refference page)

Might try one of those or could volunteer for a non-sexual male part.
Thread: Sappho Academy (refference page)

such as? 0.o
Thread: Sappho Academy (refference page)

Pe classes were allways a breath taking sight at Sappho Academy for girls. Young, healthy, nubile young women at the peek of there youth running around in the skimpest of PE uniforms, tight white cropped tops, and the skimpistes of bloomers. The girl were playing vollyball today. it was quite the sight. soft sunkisted skin bared for all to see, large breasts heaving ,with exersion, lengthly hair dancing in the air, bloomers ridding up shapely asses like skimpy panties. it was a mouth watering sight for the local boys by the fence who came to watch every day. more than few girls, often tried to reveal just a tease more, eager to the attention. however as usual These distraction were hardly tolerated, particularly by PE TA, Clara who would usually scolded the boys is the cat-calls got out of hand. although today, one of the favorite as playing. Sune Takahara, one of the school sophomore and school track star. she definitely had a body that had won the envy of other girls. long, shapely legs, large breasts, tiny waist, full and curvy hips, rich waist length black hair, and deep brown eyes. she was one of the more athletic girls and never seemed to lose her competitive edge. Sune jumped high to block a hard then landed hard, her breasts nearly bouncing out of her low cut tank top. she scooted backwards adjusting her skimpy bloomer which seemed to have a knack for ridding up her cute bubble butt. she blushed as she looked over her shoulder sensing hungry eyes ogling her curves and timidly tugging the low hem of her tank top as she tried to focus on the game. Sappho cast Sune Clara Suki matilda sayako
Thread: Sappho Academy (refference page)

craving some titty fucking... anyone wanna get it on with one of my busty girls? 0.o
Thread: Killing babies no different from abortion, experts say

Parents should be allowed to have their newborn babies killed because they are morally irrelevant and ending their lives is no different to abortion, a group of medical ethicists linked to Oxford University has argued. The article, published in the Journal of Medical Ethics, says newborn babies are not actual persons and do not have a moral right to life. The academics also argue that parents should be able to have their baby killed if it turns out to be disabled when it is born. The journals editor, Prof Julian Savulescu, director of the Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, said the article's authors had received death threats since publishing the article. He said those who made abusive and threatening posts about the study were fanatics opposed to the very values of a liberal society. The article, entitled After-birth abortion Why should the baby live?, was written by two of Prof Savulescus former associates, Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva. They argued The moral status of an infant is equivalent to that of a fetus in the sense that both lack those properties that justify the attribution of a right to life to an individual. Rather than being actual persons, newborns were potential persons. They explained Both a fetus and a newborn certainly are human beings and potential persons, but neither is a person in the sense of subject of a moral right to life. We take person to mean an individual who is capable of attributing to her own existence some at least basic value such that being deprived of this existence represents a loss to her. As such they argued it was not possible to damage a newborn by preventing her from developing the potentiality to become a person in the morally relevant sense. The authors therefore concluded that what we call after-birth abortion killing a newborn should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not disabled. They also argued that parents should be able to have the baby killed if it turned out to be disabled without their knowing before birth, for example citing that only the 64 per cent of Downs syndrome cases in Europe are diagnosed by prenatal testing. Once such children were born there was no choice for the parents but to keep the child, they wrote. To bring up such children might be an unbearable burden on the family and on society as a whole, when the state economically provides for their care. However, they did not argue that some baby killings were more justifiable than others their fundamental point was that, morally, there was no difference to abortion as already practised. They preferred to use the phrase after-birth abortion rather than infanticide to emphasise that the moral status of the individual killed is comparable with that of a fetus. Click to expand... You don't say? What is the opinion of Blue Moon?
Thread: Killing babies no different from abortion, experts say

Don't jump on me until I'm finished with what I have to say I get where they are coming from - in the sense what they are talking about they are talking about infants that are unnecessaryunwanted in a really underhanded way. The way they approach it is by using the term Morally which in this case, shouldn't be used. What they really mean in this is that they are trying to implement their own artificial Natural Selection since animals in reality - at least amongst the other animals of the planet do not keep unwanted babies or deformeddisabled babies. They are simply left to die since abortion isn't an option for them. However, in this case, if they are going to go with, can't contribute to their own existence that isn't true. As soon as a child is born, it has a conscious mind and the ability to register sounds, images, and form flimsy but actual thought. With a fetus classified as before the second trimester does not have this ability whatsoever. It can feel pain, since the nerves have been developing, but it has no actual consciousness - which is why abortion is practically non-existent after three months unless the baby is a danger to the mother's health. A fetus is a mass of underdeveloped organs, body mass, and cells. Pretty much, a lump of organic biological matter. With an actual newborn child, it can express itself emotionally and physically. Fetuses can't do this since they can't function outside of the mother's womb much less survive. So no, I don't agree with this whatsoever. If you don't want to take care of your disabled child-simply because it is disabled in a way that genetics deemed proper- then put it up for adoption because there are people who will take care of it. They changed the terms so it sounds more ethical and humane when it's neither of those things really. Being a biology student, I can see the logical side of it, but as a person, I can see the wrongness in it.
Thread: Killing babies no different from abortion, experts say

Wow, talk about a touchy subject...........Actually, touchy is a horrid understatement. Though I color myself surprised I have not heard of this. Regardless, like Hahvoc stated, as a scientist I can see the logic in it. If the child is indeed suffering unbearably and posing a financialemotional burden on the family, logic would dictate the newborn be euthanized so as to 'cleanse' the bad genes from the gene pool. However, my own personal stance is a tad murky, but I largely lean to the point that again, Hahvoc, sorry if I keep ripping you off, lol they should be put up for adoption. I mean, if this were actually practiced in large case numbers, people like Stephen Hawking wouldn't be around today. I mean, the guy has Lou Ghreig's disease and cerebral palsy, and yet he's sired several healthy children, is married, and even went through a zero-g training exercise with astronauts! If that's not a successful case, then I don't know what is.
Thread: Killing babies no different from abortion, experts say

Are there really that many people lined up waiting to adopt disabled children? Regular children and babies have a hard enough time as it is surviving the system. I do not think it is morally wrong to euthanize infants who have almost no chance at all for a normal life or anyone to care and love them. Whether they're destined for greatness or deserve a chance or not, the fact is most of those unwanted infants will never be given those opportunities. Life for the sake of living can be cruelty.
Thread: Killing babies no different from abortion, experts say

Having never adopted a child myself, I can't honestly answer that. But I can imagine there are many couples out there who have the patience and understanding it requires to raise a children affected to any degree by their disability. And what you say is true my example with Stephen Hawking was merely an example of how one could succeed even with the odds stacked against them. Though that's the inherent 'evil' in morality and ethics it really depends on the interested parties. Of course, this is a standard imposed by social customs of humanity the other species of the jungle have predators not to mention their own instinct to sort out 'the sick, the lame and the elderly'.
Thread: Killing babies no different from abortion, experts say

Alright, I understand that some of you may sling veggies at me for saying all of this, but please hear me out. Perhaps my own personal bias is getting ahead of me, but am I wrong in asking the rather obvious question Why the heck are we even listening to people who are trying to justify this? No matter how they couch the terms, the unborn baby or fetus is just as much a human as you or I. We cannot deny that if we did not abort them, before or after birth, they would grow up to be a thinking, feeling individual just as much as you or I. If it is wrong for us to kill terminally ill adults or people who are suffering from an incurable form of cancer or other serious ailment, how is it right for us to do the same thing to babies? Where do we draw the line? If we can kill children simply because they are not convenient, wanted, or desired, regardless of the scientific justification where does it end? May we start killing off children who are judged inferior in intelligence? Should we terminate them based on gender or appearance? At what point do we say, enough is enough already? How can we justify the intentional termination of other human's lives, especially when they are the weakest and least able to defend themselves of the entire population? Please understand that I do not mean this as a personal attack at anyone, but merely expressing my view of the situation and presenting some issues and questions that we all need to consider.
Thread: Killing babies no different from abortion, experts say

While the issues of morality you present are very much valid, I should nudge you back in the direction of this article. It's not really meant to say kill children that are 'inconvenient', more children whose life can be expected to be far less than desirable or have to endure extreme physical suffering because of their condition. Of course, the way they worded the paragraphs in the article itself could have been more professional, I won't disagree there. But no, you are not wrong in asking the question. But there truly lies a grey area where exactly a fetus possessing humanity begins. Some say it's at the moment of conception, others say it's after the second trimester, and others still say it's when the baby is born. Sure it would grow up into an individual but a counter-argument could be that we terminate thousands of chickens before they develop as eggs for sustenance, in case anyone happened to be wondering. They would grow up into fine chickens, but they don't because there's a reason for their termination. The question of validity lies in people's choice to eat them or not the same kind of logic applies here. Does it feel when the shell is cracked? We can never know much like a human embryo, it's god, it's a wonder I haven't been accused of plagarism, haha like Hahvoc said, a lump of largely dissociated cells. Though I have to disagree with you on being wrong in assisting in the suicide of terminally ill patients would you say it's wrong to keep them alive when they're clearly suffering from the degenerative effects of their ailment? Is that not more cruel than the sweet release death can bring? Especially if they ask for you to kill them with no hope of a cure? Sorry if I got a little melodramatic there, but I think the point stands. And never accuse yourself of bias, dear your points are well taken and very potent topics of discussion. They're your judgments based on your personal sentiments. One could indeed argue that this would be taken too far who judges what the 'best' conditions are for living? And while I can list a variety of scenarios where the willful termination of life would be indeed preferential, it would turn into a tldr and make people lose interest.