Whitzz/544K-RP-Datasets huggingface dataset:
Thread: Lycanthrope Campaign Characters

NameEnkidu World- Lycanthrope Campaign Age-19 Male Heterosexual Appearance A somewhat deep tanned body with longer, dark hair with golden eyes. His right arm is replaced with a grafted brass golem arm. Standing at 5'10, at about 143 lbs. When in Hybrid form, He sports a deep grey coat with a silver underbelly. Personality Lawful neutral- Enkidu is very devoted to Gaia, but is also not above doing something questionable for the greater good of the Tribes and Gaia, if he believes it would better for everyone to do so. He is also protective, losing his original right arm to protect someone he hardly knew at all. Becuase of his graft, he feels admittedly feels separate from the other lycanthropes, not in the 'better than you' way. but will claim it was a small price given he saved someone's life. SkillsAbilities Alongside his monk skills, Enkidu was born with an inborn talent for divine magic, and has a few arcane spells under his belt as well. His body seems almost immune to magic, as well. Notable Strengths He was born gifted with overwhelming amounts of strength and consitution, as well as a body that seems almost untouchable in a physical fight. As a monk, he is also well-versed in evading magical attacks. Extremely loyal to the clans. Notable Weaknesses Enkidu himself sees little value in his own life, despite his physical gifts. He believes he is simply a servant to Gaia, and he hopes to take out the more powerful adversaries before his own passing, so that his kindred could easily eliminate the rest of his enemies' forces. Also, He finds himself agitated when people comment on his shifting- thanks to the grafted arm, he can no longer assume his Dire Wolf form, instead only going through human and hybrid forms. Also, if he trusts someone enough, he can be quite gullible, and would do nearly anything if they said that Gaia would want it. HistoryEnkidu is a Werewolf of the Silent Strider Clans, named after the Mesopotamia's Enkidu from The Epic of Gilgamesh. Though young, his insane bouts of strength and courage gave him a fair amount of renown ammoung the clans, and he came to join several attack parties against Gaia's enemies. In one such battle, however, one of his companions was left unprotected, and was about to lose her life to a vampire. At the cost of his arm, he saved her life, and the day was one with only his right arm as a casualty. For a time, he continued on as a messenger, until a pack of Glass walkers asked if he wished to have a replacement arm, so that he could serve his beloved deity better. He accepted and underwent an excruciating grafting process, at the risk of losing his entire being. the procedure was a success, and he joined the fray once more. now he follows the pack of the she-wolf he once saved as an Omega. EquipmentRing of Sustenance, Ring of Chameleon power, Belt of Battle, Boots of Sidestepping GoalsTo serve Gaia however possible Misc.None as of yet.
Thread: should incest be legal?

who thinks that incest should be legal?
Thread: should incest be legal?

If it's consensual I think it should be legal. Everyone is up in arms about people telling people who they can't love, whether they be gay or lesbian. I don't see much difference in consensual incest. If they're happy, leave them be.
Thread: should incest be legal?

I really don't believe parents should want to have sex with their kids. They are your offspring to cherish and nurture. There are a lot of psychological reasons why that's pretty messed up. Cousins aren't that bad because there is biological diversity and less chance of psychological damage to any potential offspring. I'm against family unit incest. Otherwise, cousins are fine.
Thread: should incest be legal?

I think the issue with incest is twofold. For one, in many cases the first indecent incident occurs when the child is much too young to be exposed to such things, too young to be able to give their consent. In such cases, incest can be extremely harmful to the child's development mentally. Especially where the instigator is an authority figure such as a father or an older relative. for the other, there is the issue of mutation and recessive traits coming to the surface more often. This is a definite problem, and it's not something that can simply be dismissed, especially if incest becomes a 'family tradition', of sorts. However, I think that consensual incest, with both partners over the age of consent, and proper contraceptives in place, should be legal.
Thread: should incest be legal?

It is such a grey area, because there is so much psychological impact in there. I agree with Hahvoc, if it is in the family unit motherfather with their children even sibling ones. There is something else going on there, and it isn't just an oh I love you type thing. There is either a power struggle, or something more psychologically wrong and perhaps something worse happened in the past. For just cousins, not directlly connected into the family. Like people who meet, didn't realize they were related and fall in love that is a bit different. But when it is something close family, there is something else going on in there. Legality shouldn't come into it directly, but it is something that should be looked into. I know around here it is more of a shock factor type kink, but in RL it is much much different no doubt.
Thread: should incest be legal?

here is my opinion first of all i see incestuous relations as no different than gays and lesbians or interracial. they have long been taboo and critisized and said it was wrong and discusting. but the worlds view on those are changing. if 2 people are in love then it is their decision to be in a relationship together and should be free to live their life as they choose, not how the rest of the world chooses. secondly, if you are interested, you should do some research on the scientific facts about 2 relatives giving birth. you would be surprised to know that 2 people with the same background 2 white people or 2 black people etc have a slightly higher of giving birth to a baby with birth defects. while first cousins only have an extra like 3 or 3.5 higher chance of having a baby with birth defects. the lowest risk is people who are not related by blood and dont have the same background 1 white and 1 black or example. the only reason why some people see it as gross or wrong, is only because thats what we have been led to believe and forced in fact to believe. there is plenty of countries in the world where no laws prohibiting incest in any form. while some others do prohibit laws against close relatives such as motherfather with their daughterson etc but allow cousins. some countries that will even allow first cousins to get married. so question is, if incest is so bad and wrong and gross and my most favorite unnatural then why is there other countries who allow it? unnatural is my favorite because it was natural in fact in the beginning. how do you think 2 people populated an entire race? 2 people gave birth to kids and those kids in turn had to further procreation through incest. for a long time incest was not only popular it was more of a given. but one reason they put laws against incest was so people would have to mingle outside their family and be more sociable. another reason was to try and breed more better offspring.
Thread: should incest be legal?

No one is really disputing the actually loving each other fact Incestlover, if that is truly the case all the more power to them to being together. What I see you ignoring is the bad side of incest, the ones were it is the one side controlling the other pressuring them into doing this. Or even more so, when sexual abuse happens to one or both say like siblings and they only trust each other enough and no one else. Though that could be a loving relationship, it could be very unhealthy for them also. That is the part I cannot agree on, that is the part where things need to be looked into deeper. That is the true part that really bothers people about it.
Thread: should incest be legal?

The issue with birth defects doesn't really come into play with the first generation. It's generations of inbreeding and the dominance of traits that lead to said birth defects become more and more prevalent. And I'm going to concur with Hahvy.
Thread: should incest be legal?

Forget all the defections and risks that comes with it, or even the issue of whether it's consensual or not. Religion will never allow it to be legal. At least where most of us live. Try letting the U.S legalize gay marriage first, and I mean the whole country. Try telling the Christian Majority that Incest should be legal, see what happens.
Thread: should incest be legal?

I don't think so for immediate family members. While you can throw around terms like consensual, remember that family is a big influence on you. So you can say it's consensual that a sister loves her brother, but given that he may be 10 years older, and he's decided from 16 thats the lifestyle he wants when she is legal, well he has 10 years in which to groom her and shape her life. Is that consensual if he does that? Not really, it's child grooming. Then you have the abnormalities and things like this that come with reproduction. I understand people enjoy the incest fantasy. But from what I can tell, in general the reality isn't very nice. It's very rare that you get two people thinking along the same lines and seems to be a much larger male fantasy than female and often results in rape or grooming. People say it's about love and that, but I don't see that, it's about sex. If you love a member of your family, then you let them grow and develop with your support and unconditional being there for them. Involving sex wouldn't end well for the most part. On the other coin, should it be legal for cousins to marry? Sure. I wouldn't myself given that I'm close to my cousins, but I know friends who have had relationships with very distant cousins. I don't see an issue.
Thread: should incest be legal?

Saying two people populated the planet is the Catholic lexicon. However, Lilith was Adam's first wife, not Eve, so it wasn't two people if you're going to go with that logic. Diversity makes the population grow and find stronger and stronger traits for survival. We're not like bacteria and other such things where we could inbreed for hundreds of years without any serious mutations. And saying that incest is unnatural is a fact. It's not natural to want to have sex with your offspring. To see your kid grow up and go, I wanna tap that. Cousins, as they say, are the first friends you make besides siblings so it makes sense there would be fondness there but other than that, nope. Just can't agree with it.
Thread: should incest be legal?

incestlover said unnatural is my favorite because it was natural in fact in the beginning. how do you think 2 people populated an entire race? 2 people gave birth to kids and those kids in turn had to further procreation through incest. for a long time incest was not only popular it was more of a given. but one reason they put laws against incest was so people would have to mingle outside their family and be more sociable. another reason was to try and breed more better offspring. Click to expand... Two people populated the entire human race? Source, please. And I mean peer-reviewed science, not religious texts.
Thread: should incest be legal?

I hate this forum because I always walk in with an opinion and then reading all your decent responses make me rethink my stance. I once had a fling with a cousin by marriage so I'd be hypocritical to claim that its wrong and should be illegal. I agree with Hahvy, Family Unit incest brotherxsister, fatherxdaughter etc Should be illegal but Cousin to cousin should be allowed as long as the relation is 2nd or later or possibly by marriage. Playing devils advocate I think it should be illegal from the stance of over population. I'd rather block someone from being married then have to deal with a thousand more babies a second because finding someone to bop is a family reunion away. That and it honestly feels tacky. Like... come on... find a REAL girlfriend man. And think of what happens if it DOESNT work out. You're family will be thrown into turmoil. Is it worth one chick or man? Not to me. No one is worth destroying my family over. Now Karen, everyone is entitled to their opinion. Even if its based off religion or science or mother fucking Star Wars.
Thread: should incest be legal?

Nibbles brought up a point. There's all sorts of relationships people will have--- family, friend, professional, and romantic. A lot of people have a hard time mixing friendship and romance for fear of fucking up the bond they already have, and making it awkward. And if things don't work out things may never be the same. Perhaps people shouldn't mix family and romance. Family is already a strong bond on its own. You can fuck it up 4 lyfe if you choose to turn your relationship with a family member into something more and it ends up not working out. Family is blood and law, you can't get rid of them. That's how I see family. Just... a no-go zone. They're family and that's all they should be. Also sorry to sound rude, but the whole idea of a parent and child romance is just... I don't know, it feels unnatural to me. A parent and child bond is already one of the strongest. If it turns into something more, I might question the emotional and mental health of one or both of them. Is it the child failing to move on and separate themselves from their parent? Is it the parent failing to let go? Is it one or both of them trying to effortlessly fill a void they feel they can't fill elsewhere?
Thread: should incest be legal?

MsMuffintops said Nibbles brought up a point. There's all sorts of relationships people will have--- family, friend, professional, and romantic. A lot of people have a hard time mixing friendship and romance for fear of fucking up the bond they already have, and making it awkward. And if things don't work out things may never be the same. Perhaps people shouldn't mix family and romance. Family is already a strong bond on its own. You can fuck it up 4 lyfe if you choose to turn your relationship with a family member into something more and it ends up not working out. Family is blood and law, you can't get rid of them. That's how I see family. Just... a no-go zone. They're family and that's all they should be. Also sorry to sound rude, but the whole idea of a parent and child romance is just... I don't know, it feels unnatural to me. A parent and child bond is already one of the strongest. If it turns into something more, I might question the emotional and mental health of one or both of them. Is it the child failing to move on and separate themselves from their parent? Is it the parent failing to let go? Is it one or both of them trying to effortlessly fill a void they feel they can't fill elsewhere? Click to expand... See this is part of the reason I posted this. Cause people like that can state their opinion so profoundly. Good comments everyone! But just remember, opinions are like assholes, everyone has one. We should also respect the next persons opinion, and the pprevious ones. As for proof that someone asked for from me, no one has any proof of how the world was populated. I was going by the most popular one.
Thread: should incest be legal?

No, you shouldn't respect everyone's opinion. Some opinions are just fucking wrong, ethically or objectively. Lots of grey sure but there's a few areas where there is very little defence.
Thread: should incest be legal?

But I think incest is one where there should be some gray area. But anyone who sees it as a legit option that should be respected at this point in society should expect some hostility with the concept. Yeah, a lot of societies practice in it, and it's been around for quite some time, but in our society it's one of the things that is generally frowned upon. But Nihil too has a point. Some things are just unacceptable, and typically that is when it involves someone who can't give proper consent.
Thread: should incest be legal?

I was speaking in a general sense, I just don't like the attitude that all opinions must be respected. This is a grey era predominately in my book though. Racial hatred based on whack science from a century ago, that's definitely wrong.
Thread: should incest be legal?

Dr. Nibbles said Now Karen, everyone is entitled to their opinion. Even if its based off religion or science or mother fucking Star Wars. Click to expand... True. But as someone already pointed out, not all opinions are equal. So I was asking if the opinion in question was based on verifiable, peer-reviewed science, or religious dogma. The bearer of the opinion is entitled to it either way...but whether I take it seriously is another matter.
Thread: should incest be legal?

incestlover said As for proof that someone asked for from me, no one has any proof of how the world was populated. I was going by the most popular one. Click to expand... Vox populi , then? As for incest, I don't care for it. But I think government legislating morality is a perilous road. My major concern with incest already raised by others is the issue of power and consent. Family, especially elders, have great power over young people. The idea of children being conditioned and groomed to be sex partners of parents and unclesaunts bothers me, and I think it's a legitimate concern. I don't know what I'd do if I were queen. I think, however, I would legalize relations between cousins and siblings age of consent would still apply. However, across generations, I'm not sure I would. If I did, I think I would make the age of consent 20 or even 21 for such relationships, because of the concerns discussed above and elsewhere.
Thread: should incest be legal?

KarenNelson said incestlover said As for proof that someone asked for from me, no one has any proof of how the world was populated. I was going by the most popular one. Click to expand... Vox populi , then? As for incest, I don't care for it. But I think government legislating morality is a perilous road. My major concern with incest already raised by others is the issue of power and consent. Family, especially elders, have great power over young people. The idea of children being conditioned and groomed to be sex partners of parents and unclesaunts bothers me, and I think it's a legitimate concern. I don't know what I'd do if I were queen. I think, however, I would legalize relations between cousins and siblings age of consent would still apply. However, across generations, I'm not sure I would. If I did, I think I would make the age of consent 20 or even 21 for such relationships, because of the concerns discussed above and elsewhere. Click to expand... The minimum age to consume alcohol in the US is 21. The minimum age in canada is 19. Do you think that age restrictions or laws period stop people from doing what they want? You don't have to like someones opinion but you should respect their right to having their own opinion. As for the power an adult has over their child, there is plenty of relationships between one person in their 20's and the other is in their 40's or 50's or more. So I guess while we are at it, might as well make it illegal for them to be involved in a sexual relationsship too? Since one is 2 or 3 times the age of the other person.
Thread: should incest be legal?

incestlover said The minimum age to consume alcohol in the US is 21. The minimum age in canada is 19. Do you think that age restrictions or laws period stop people from doing what they want? Click to expand... Yes, I understand the whole Prohibition didn't stop drinking, therefore Prohibition was useless argument. And I agree with it. To an extent. But that road runs both ways. Why not legalize robbery and murder, since some people break the law and rob and kill anyway? Why bother with laws against robbery and homicide? I think the answer is obvious there is a legitimate interest in using State power to diminish social ills in some areas, even if we've learned from history to choose these areas wisely and not over-legislate. Which is why I could support limited legalization of incest. Drawing a tighter, more constrained set of lines based on protection of minors from sexual exploitation--which is a goal I think most people would agree on--rather than a broader squick factor that's harder to defend objectively.
Thread: should incest be legal?

incestlover said KarenNelson said incestlover said As for proof that someone asked for from me, no one has any proof of how the world was populated. I was going by the most popular one. Click to expand... Vox populi , then? As for incest, I don't care for it. But I think government legislating morality is a perilous road. My major concern with incest already raised by others is the issue of power and consent. Family, especially elders, have great power over young people. The idea of children being conditioned and groomed to be sex partners of parents and unclesaunts bothers me, and I think it's a legitimate concern. I don't know what I'd do if I were queen. I think, however, I would legalize relations between cousins and siblings age of consent would still apply. However, across generations, I'm not sure I would. If I did, I think I would make the age of consent 20 or even 21 for such relationships, because of the concerns discussed above and elsewhere. Click to expand... The minimum age to consume alcohol in the US is 21. The minimum age in canada is 19. Do you think that age restrictions or laws period stop people from doing what they want? You don't have to like someones opinion but you should respect their right to having their own opinion. As for the power an adult has over their child, there is plenty of relationships between one person in their 20's and the other is in their 40's or 50's or more. So I guess while we are at it, might as well make it illegal for them to be involved in a sexual relationsship too? Since one is 2 or 3 times the age of the other person. Click to expand... Pretty much like Hahvy said in her post, there is a HUGE difference between a parent and a child and a 20 year old boy and a 50 year old woman meeting on the street. A child doesn't need to greet you, get to know you, buy you a drink, or take you to dinner to make an undying bond and emotional effect on you. From the second that person pops out of the womb, they are automatically the most important person in the world to the parents or well, hopefully. Their purpose in life is to care for that child, raise them, teach them, etc. I think in all ways, that bond should never turn into something more or different. A child is raised to reflect their parents. They usually grow up with the same beliefs, ideas, interests, morals, values, etc. Would it really be fair for a parent to get into a relationship with this child? They basically planted, grew, popped out, trained, and manipulated someone into being what they wanted them to be. Should it really end as a romantic interest? That just comes off incredibly unhealthy for both parties involved and unfair to the child.