VishaalY/solutions-architect-hf-dataset huggingface dataset:
Question: How do I resolve "403 ERROR - The request could not be satisfied. Bad Request" in CloudFront?

Amazon CloudFront is returning the error message "403 ERROR - The request could not be satisfied. Bad Request."Short descriptionThe error message "403 ERROR - The request could not be satisfied. Bad Request." is from the client. This error can occur due to one of the following reasons:The request is initiated over HTTP, but the CloudFront distribution is configured to allow only HTTPS requests. To resolve this issue, follow the steps in the Allow HTTP requests Resolution section.The requested alternate domain name (CNAME) isn't associated with the CloudFront distribution. To resolve this issue, follow the steps in the Associate a CNAME with a distribution Resolution section.Note: This resolution is for troubleshooting the error when you own the application or website that uses CloudFront to serve content to end users. If you receive this error when trying to view an application or access a website, then contact the provider or website owner for assistance.For information on troubleshooting other types of 403 errors, see How do I troubleshoot 403 errors from CloudFront?ResolutionAllow HTTP requestsFollow these steps:Open the Amazon CloudFront console.Choose the distribution that's returning the Bad Request error.Choose the Behaviors tab.Choose the behavior that matches the request. Then, choose Edit.For Viewer Protocol Policy, choose either HTTP and HTTPS or Redirect HTTP to HTTPS.Note: HTTP and HTTPS allows connections on both HTTP and HTTPS. Redirect HTTP to HTTPS automatically redirects HTTP requests to HTTPS.Choose Save Changes.Associate a CNAME with a distributionFollow these steps:Open the Amazon CloudFront console.Choose the distribution that's returning the Bad Request error.Choose the General tab.Under Settings, choose Edit.For Alternate Domain Names (CNAMEs), select Add Item.Enter the CNAME that you want to associate with the CloudFront distribution.Under Custom SSL certificate, choose the certificate that covers the domain. For more information, see How do I configure my CloudFront distribution to use an SSL/TLS certificate?Note: An SSL certificate is required to associate a CNAME with a distribution. For more information see, Requirements for using alternate domain names.Choose Save changes.

Related informationHow CloudFront processes HTTP and HTTPS requestsHow do I resolve "403 Error - The request could not be satisfied. Request Blocked" in CloudFront?502 and 494 error: The request could not be satisfied by CloudFront
Question: How can I specify multiple Amazon S3 object prefixes for my Snowball export job?

I want to specify multiple Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3) object key name prefixes for my AWS Snowball export job. However, when I create a Snowball export job with multiple prefixes, I see that only some files in the prefix range are copied.

ResolutionSnowball export jobs support only one prefix range per S3 bucket. To copy all objects across multiple prefixes, you must specify the range to cover all the object key name prefixes that you want to copy. If you're using the AWS Command Line Interface (AWS CLI) to create an export job, then you must confirm that the BeginMarker and EndMarker that you specify within the KeyRange include all the prefixes that you want to copy.Note: The AWS CLI doesn't return an error when you specify multiple values for BeginMarker or EndMarker. However, doing so results in an incomplete copy operation.If you receive errors when running AWS CLI commands, make sure that you’re using the most recent version of the AWS CLI.If the prefix range (key range) that you specify results in an incomplete copy operation, you can do either of the following:Copy the remaining objects to another S3 bucket. You can choose to use the whole bucket to export the remaining data. Or, you can choose to export the remaining objects to a prefix range using a single value for BeginMarker or EndMarker. You're charged for the PUT, COPY, and LIST requests.If you can't copy the remaining objects to another S3 bucket, then you must cancel the incomplete export job. Then, create another export job to copy the remaining objects or prefixes. For example, create two export jobs (or more as needed) to include the desired objects or prefixes.Warning: This option costs more than copying the remaining objects to another bucket.

Related informationUsing export rangesAmazon S3 pricingAWS Snowball pricing
Question: How do I deploy code from a CodeCommit repository to an Elastic Beanstalk environment?

I want to use AWS CodeCommit to deploy incremental code updates to an AWS Elastic Beanstalk environment without re-uploading my entire project.

ResolutionYou can use the Elastic Beanstalk Command Line Interface (EB CLI) to deploy your application directly from a CodeCommit repository.Install the EB CLI.Initialize a local Git repository.Create a CodeCommit repository.Note: You can also use the EB CLI to configure additional branches. Then, you can use an existing repository to deploy your code to your Elastic Beanstalk environment.Deploy your code from the CodeCommit repository.

Related informationManaging environments
Question: How do I change the subnet mask for the default subnet of my default Amazon VPC?

I want to change the subnet mask for the default subnet of my default virtual private cloud (VPC) in Amazon Virtual Private Cloud (Amazon VPC).

Short descriptionYou can delete thedefault subnet for your default VPC and replace it with customized configurations.

ResolutionDelete the default subnet for your default Amazon VPC in an AWS Region.Create a new subnet with your preferred subnet mask size. Be sure that the new subnet is part of your default VPC in the same AWS Region.Note: The first four IP addresses and the last IP address in each subnet CIDR block aren't available for your use. These IP addresses can't be assigned to an instance.

Related informationDelete your default subnets and default VPCHow Amazon VPC works
Question: How do I increase my security group rule quota in Amazon VPC?

I've reached the quota for "Rules per security group" or "Security groups per network interface" in my Amazon Virtual Private Cloud (Amazon VPC). How do I increase my security group quota in Amazon VPC?ResolutionThe quota for "Security groups per network interface" multiplied by the quota for "Rules per security group" can't exceed 1,000. You can modify the quota for both so that the product of the two doesn't exceed 1,000.For more information on how to modify the default security group quota, see Amazon VPC quotas.
Question: Why can't I see the instance metrics for my Amazon SageMaker endpoint though I can see the invocation metrics?

I can see invocation metrics for my Amazon SageMaker endpoint in Amazon CloudWatch. However, instance metrics such as CPUUtilization, MemoryUtilization, and DiskUtilization are missing.

ResolutionThis happens when the execution role for Amazon SageMaker doesn't have the PutMetricData permission for CloudWatch. To resolve the issue, add "cloudwatch:PutMetricData" to the AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) policy that's attached to the execution role.To send instance metrics to CloudWatch, instances must assume the execution role. That's why the PutMetricData permission is required for instance metrics.

Related informationMonitor Amazon SageMaker with Amazon CloudWatchSageMaker roles
Question: How do I troubleshoot issues with sending email messages in Amazon Cognito with default email settings compared to Amazon SES?

I need more information to resolve issues with sending email messages in Amazon Cognito with default settings compared to Amazon Simple Email Service (Amazon SES).

ResolutionTo determine whether Amazon Cognito sent an email message to a user's account, review the user's email configuration.In all scenarios, start by checking your email inbox and spam folder to verify that you didn't receive an email message from Amazon Cognito.Your troubleshooting steps depend on your email configuration in the Amazon Cognito console on the Messaging tab.If you choose Send email with Cognito in your setup, then Amazon Cognito uses an AWS owned account for email messages. With this setting, users don't have visibility into send metrics for that account. Users can open an AWS Support case to request access to Amazon SES to check the status of email messages to certain addresses.If you choose Send email with Amazon SES - Recommended in your setup, then users are actively using a verified email account in Amazon SES. Users can view Amazon CloudWatch logs to see if an email message was sent. When the sent email message is confirmed, users can explore other information in their accounts. To learn more about the different errors you might see in an Amazon SES CloudWatch log, see Amazon SES email sending errors.
Question: How do I hide my Lambda function's environment variables and unencrypted text from an IAM user?

I want to prevent AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) users with access to my AWS Lambda function from seeing environment variables and unencrypted text. How do I do that?ResolutionNote: The following solution prevents IAM identities from seeing a Lambda function's environment variables only in the Lambda console and the Lambda API. It doesn't prevent IAM identities from accessing decrypted environment variables using the function's code, or from outputting the environment variable values to Amazon CloudWatch Logs.To prevent IAM identities from accessing passwords, keys, or other sensitive information in your Lambda environment variables, do the following:Use an AWS Key Management Service (AWS KMS) customer managed key to encrypt the environment variables. To set up a KMS key, follow the instructions in Securing environment variables.Important: Make sure that you edit the key policy for the KMS key so that the policy denies access to the IAM identities that don't need access.KMS key policy example that denies specific IAM users permission to see Lambda environment variablesNote: Replace arn:aws:iam::1234567890:User1DeniedAccess and arn:aws:iam::1234567890:User2DeniedAccess with the Amazon Resource Names (ARNs) of IAM identities that you want to deny access. You can add more IAM ARNs to the key policy as needed.{    "Id": "MyCustomKey",    "Version": "2012-10-17",    "Statement": [        {            "Sid": "Deny IAM users permission to see Lambda environment variables",            "Effect": "Deny",            "Principal": {                "AWS": [                    "arn:aws:iam::1234567890:User1DeniedAccess",                    "arn:aws:iam::1234567890:User2DeniedAccess"                ]            },            "Action": [                "kms:Encrypt",                "kms:Decrypt",                "kms:ReEncrypt*",                "kms:GenerateDataKey*",                "kms:DescribeKey"            ],            "Resource": "*"        }    ]}You receive an error message that the denied IAM user sees if they try to view the function's environment variables similar to the following:"Lambda was unable to decrypt your environment variables because the KMS access was denied. Please check your KMS permissions. KMS Exception: AccessDeniedException"Related informationCreating keysAWS Lambda permissions
Question: How can I delete an Elastic Beanstalk environment that's out of sync with a deleted Amazon RDS database?

When I try to delete my AWS Elastic Beanstalk environment, I get the following error message in my environment's event stream: "Deleting RDS database named: xxxxxxxxx failed Reason: DBInstance xxxxxxxxx was not found during DescribeDBInstances." Next, I get another error message: "Stack deletion failed: The following resource(s) failed to delete: [AWSEBRDSDatabase]."How can I resolve these errors and delete my Elastic Beanstalk environment?Short DescriptionYou receive this error if you delete an Amazon Relational Database Service (Amazon RDS) database that was created as part of your Elastic Beanstalk environment. The lifecycle of that database is tied to your Elastic Beanstalk environment. If you delete that database from the Amazon RDS console (called an out-of-band deletion), then Elastic Beanstalk gets out of sync with your database resource and can't be deleted.Resolution1.    Open the AWS CloudFormation console.2.    In the navigation pane, choose Stacks.3.    In the Stack name column, select the stack for the Elastic Beanstalk environment that you want to delete.Note: In the Status column for your stack, you should see DELETE_FAILED.Tip: You can identify your stack by verifying that the environment ID from the Description column in the AWS CloudFormation console matches the environment ID of your Elastic Beanstalk environment.4.    Choose Delete.5.    In the pop-up window, select the AWSEBRDSDatabase check box in the Resources to retain - optional section, and then choose Delete Stack.Note: AWSEBRDSDatabase is the name of the resource that you want to retain, or skip, when you delete the stack. If you skip this database resource, the stack can delete successfully.Tip: You can also use the AWS Command Line Interface (AWS CLI) to delete a stack with the following command:aws cloudformation delete-stack --stack-name YourStackName --retain-resources AWSEBRDSDatabase6.    After the stack changes to DELETE_COMPLETE status, terminate your Elastic Beanstalk environment.
Question: How do I resolve the "Access Denied" error in Kinesis Data Firehose when writing to an Amazon S3 bucket?

I'm trying to write data from Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose to an Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3) bucket that's encrypted by AWS Key Management Service (AWS KMS). However, I receive an "Access Denied" error message. How do I resolve this?ResolutionImportant: Make sure that the AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) role for Kinesis Data Firehose has relevant Amazon S3 permissions. For more information about S3 permissions, see Grant Kinesis Data Firehose access to an Amazon S3 destination.To resolve the "Access Denied" error message in Kinesis Data Firehose, perform the following steps:1.    Open the AWS KMS console.2.    Choose the KMS key that is currently used to encrypt your S3 bucket.3.    Choose Switch to policy view.4.    Check that you have the required permissions in the KMS key policy. Proper access allows you to encrypt data that is written to your S3 bucket.Note: For more information about KMS key policies, see Protecting data using server-side encryption with KMS keys stored in AWS Key Management Service (SSE-KMS).5.    Update your policy, granting Kinesis Data Firehose access to the KMS key:{            "Sid": "Allow use of the key",            "Effect": "Allow",            "Principal": {                "AWS": "arn:aws:iam::<account-ID>:role/<FirehoseRole>"            },            "Action": [                "kms:Encrypt",                "kms:Decrypt",                "kms:ReEncrypt*",                "kms:GenerateDataKey*",                "kms:DescribeKey"            ],            "Resource": "<ARN of the KMS key>"}Be sure to specify the Amazon Resource Name (ARN) of the KMS key that encrypted your S3 bucket.6.    Choose Save.You can also resolve the "Access Denied" error message without modifying the policy. To resolve the error message, perform the following steps:1.    Open the AWS KMS console.2.    Choose the KMS key that is currently being used to encrypt your S3 bucket.3.    In the Key users section, choose Add.4.    Select your Kinesis Data Firehose role.5.    Choose Add. You now have the proper permissions to write data from Kinesis Data Firehose to the encrypted S3 bucket.

Related informationEditing keys
Question: How can I run an Amazon ECS task on Fargate in a private subnet?

I want to run an Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) task on AWS Fargate in a private subnet.

Short descriptionYou can run Fargate tasks in private subnets. However, based on your use case, you might require internet access for certain operations, such as pulling an image from a public repository. Or, you might want to prevent any internet access for your tasks.To run Fargate tasks in a private subnet without internet access, use VPC endpoints. VPC endpoints allow you to run Fargate tasks without granting the tasks access to the internet. The required endpoints are accessed over a private IP address.If you need your task to access the internet from a private subnet, grant internet access using a NAT Gateway. The required endpoints are accessed over the public IP address of the NAT gateway.

ResolutionCreate a VPCCreate an Amazon Virtual Private Cloud (Amazon VPC) with public or private subnets.Then, depending on your use case, follow the steps in Use a private subnet without internet access (VPC endpoints method) or Use a Private subnet with internet access sections of this article.Use a private subnet without internet access (VPC endpoints method)To create interface endpoints and an S3 gateway:Create an S3 gateway endpoint.Create ECR interface endpoints.If your task uses Secrets Manager to inject secrets into the task and CloudWatch Logs, create interface endpoints for Secrets Manager and CloudWatch Logs.Then, follow the instructions in the Create an Amazon ECS cluster and service section of this article.Use a private subnet with internet accessCreate a NAT gateway.When you create your NAT gateway, be sure that you:Place your NAT gateway inside the public subnet.Update the route table of the private subnet. For Destination, enter 0.0.0.0/0. For Target, select the ID of your NAT gateway.Then, follow the instructions in the Create an Amazon ECS cluster and service section of this article.Create an Amazon ECS cluster and serviceCreate an Amazon ECS cluster using the Networking only template (powered by Fargate).Create an Amazon ECS service.When you configure the network for the service, be sure that you:Choose the cluster that you created in step 1 for your cluster VPC.Based on the method that you chose earlier, choose the private subnet that you configured for the VPC endpoints, or the subnet that you configured for the NAT gateway.Now, your new tasks will launch in the private subnet.
Question: What S3 bucket policy should I use to comply with the AWS Config rule s3-bucket-ssl-requests-only?

I enabled the AWS Config rule s3-bucket-ssl-requests-only to be sure that my Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3) bucket policies require encryption during data transit. How can I create bucket policies that comply with this rule?ResolutionNote: Amazon S3 offers encryption in transit and encryption at rest. Encryption in transit refers to HTTPS and encryption at rest refers to client-side or server-side encryption.Amazon S3 allows both HTTP and HTTPS requests. By default, requests are made through the AWS Management Console, AWS Command Line Interface (AWS CLI), or HTTPS.To comply with the s3-bucket-ssl-requests-only rule, confirm that your bucket policies explicitly deny access to HTTP requests. Bucket policies that allow HTTPS requests without explicitly denying HTTP requests might not comply with the rule.To determine HTTP or HTTPS requests in a bucket policy, use a condition that checks for the key "aws:SecureTransport". When this key is true, then request is sent through HTTPS. To comply with the s3-bucket-ssl-requests-only rule, create a bucket policy that explicitly denies access when the request meets the condition "aws:SecureTransport": "false". This policy explicitly denies access to HTTP requests.Bucket policy that complies with s3-bucket-ssl-requests-only ruleFor example, the following bucket policy complies with the rule. The policy explicitly denies all actions on the bucket and objects when the request meets the condition "aws:SecureTransport": "false":{  "Id": "ExamplePolicy",  "Version": "2012-10-17",  "Statement": [    {      "Sid": "AllowSSLRequestsOnly",      "Action": "s3:*",      "Effect": "Deny",      "Resource": [        "arn:aws:s3:::DOC-EXAMPLE-BUCKET",        "arn:aws:s3:::DOC-EXAMPLE-BUCKET/*"      ],      "Condition": {        "Bool": {          "aws:SecureTransport": "false"        }      },      "Principal": "*"    }  ]}Bucket policy that doesn't comply with s3-bucket-ssl-requests-only ruleIn contrast, the following bucket policy doesn't comply with the rule. Instead of using an explicit deny statement, the policy allows access to requests that meet the condition "aws:SecureTransport": "true". This statement allows anonymous access to s3:GetObject for all objects in the bucket if the request uses HTTPS. Avoid this type of bucket policy unless your use case requires anonymous access through HTTPS.{  "Id": "ExamplePolicy",  "Version": "2012-10-17",  "Statement": [    {      "Sid": "NOT-RECOMMENDED-FOR__AWSCONFIG-Rule_s3-bucket-ssl-requests-only",      "Action": "s3:GetObject",      "Effect": "Allow",      "Resource": [        "arn:aws:s3:::DOC-EXAMPLE-BUCKET/*"      ],      "Condition": {        "Bool": {          "aws:SecureTransport": "true"        }      },      "Principal": "*"    }  ]}Related informationHow to use bucket policies and apply defense-in-depth to help secure your Amazon S3 data
Question: Why didn't I receive a domain transfer confirmation or authorization email from Route 53?

I'm trying to transfer my domain from another registrar to Amazon Route 53, but I didn't receive the confirmation or authorization emails. Why didn't I receive these emails, and how can I resend them so that I can transfer my domain?Short descriptionIf you didn't receive the confirmation or authorization emails from Route 53, you can send a request to resend them. Before submitting a request to resend these emails, be sure that:Privacy protection features for your domain are turned offYour domain's current registrar has the correct contact information

ResolutionVerify that the privacy protection feature for your domain is turned off with your current registrar.If necessary, update your registrant contact email address with your domain's current registrar.Resend your confirmation or authorization emails.Complete your domain registration transfer.Note: Due to General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), it might not be possible to use WHOIS to determine your registrant contact information. If you're unable to transfer your domain due to GDPR, contact AWS Support.

Related informationTransferring a domain to a different AWS accountTransferring registration for a domain to Amazon Route 53Contacting AWS Support about domain registration issues