Manufacturing a Stable Climate: Drivers of Industrial Sector Greenhouse Gas Mitigation

Abstract/nManufacturing a Stable Climate:/nDrivers of Industrial Sector Greenhouse Gas Mitigation/nBy/nNathaniel Thomas Aden/nDoctor of Philosophy in Energy and Resources/nUniversity of California, Berkeley/nProfessor Daniel Kammen, Co-Chair/nProfessor Arpad Horvath, Co-Chair/nAs the primary means for growth and development over the past two centuries, industry has played a central role in generating our current Anthropocene. The increasing impacts of climate change bring industry to the fore as the largest global emitter of greenhouse gases and as a potential manufacturer of transformational technologies and infrastructure. While energy efficiency improvements are driving industrial sector emissions and cost reductions, additional switching away from fossil fuels and capture of carbon emissions is needed for climate stabilization./nThe decline of U.S. industrial sector carbon dioxide emissions by one-fifth between 2000 and 2015 was driven by multiple economic and technological transitions. Five megatrends that contributed to the reduction of U.S. industrial and manufacturing sector emissions include: structural shift from goods to services, energy transition to electricity, natural gas, and renewables, increased trade and globalization, introduction of new technologies, and changing norms, regulations, and policies. These interrelated megatrends provide context for decomposition and facility-level analysis of U.S. manufacturing GHG emissions./nAchieving the Paris climate goal of limiting warming to well-below two degrees will require substantial greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reductions and economic transformation. A growing group of countries are moving toward the Paris goal by reducing GHG emissions while continuing to grow their economies. However, existing metrics such as carbon emissions intensity of gross domestic product (GDP) do not capture dynamic country contributions to economic transformation and global emissions reductions. This dissertation develops an index of GHG-GDP divergence (ICGGD) to characterize country performance and explore the role of industry and trade in low-carbon economic transformation between 2000 and 2015. In addition to assessing historical drivers, the index is also used to identify factors that can enable a growing group of countries to delink their GHG emissions and GDP growth. One unexpected finding of the ICGGD empirical results is that larger growth in merchandise imports is correlated with lower levels of country-level emissions performance. This appears to contravene the “leakage” theory that countries have reduced local production-based emissions via import growth; it is one of several topics addressed in this dissertation that could benefit from further research./nFinally, the global political swing towards populism in 2016 was largely resultant from real and perceived changes to industry and manufacturing employment. The global redistribution of industrial activity and jobs between 1990 and 2015 undermined the previous social contract whereby government legitimacy rested on provision of economic growth and opportunity for all. Rather than attempting to turn back the clock with nostalgic shibboleths about fossil-fueled manufacturing greatness, a new social contract is needed based on inclusive, climate-focused industrial policy. The fourth chapter assesses the role of industrial policy mechanisms in achieving inclusive low-carbon transformation.

Advisor: Kammen, Daniel M
Horvath, Arpad