Vicky190519/IPC_and_BNS_transformation huggingface dataset:
Discuss the consequences of intentional omission to give information of an offence by a person bound to inform according to Indian Penal Code (IPC 1860) Section 202: Intentional omission to give information of offence by person bound to inform and their relevant Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 (BNS 2023) code reference.

{'IPC Section': '202', 'IPC Heading': 'Intentional omission to give information of offence by person bound to inform', 'IPC Descriptions': ' Indian Penal Code, 1860 
202.
Intentional omission to give information of offence by person bound to inform
Whoever, knowing or
having reason to believe that an offence has been committed, intentionally
omits to give any information respecting that offence which he is legally bound
to give, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term
which may extend to six months, or with fine, or with both.', 'BNS Section': '239', 'BNS Heading': 'Intentional omission to give information of offence by person bound to inform', 'BNS description': 'The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
239. Intentional omission to give information of offence by person bound to inform.
Whoever, knowing or having reason to believe that an offence has been committed, intentionally omits to give any information respecting that offence which he is legally bound to give, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to five thousand rupees, or with both.'}
Explain the legal implications of giving false information respecting an offence committed as outlined in Indian Penal Code (IPC 1860) Section 203: Giving false information respecting an offence committed and their relevant Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 (BNS 2023) code reference.

{'IPC Section': '203', 'IPC Heading': 'Giving false information respecting an offence committed', 'IPC Descriptions': ' Indian Penal Code, 1860 
203. Giving
false information respecting an offence committed
Whoever knowing or
having reason to believe that an offence has been committed, gives any
information respecting that offence which he knows or believes to be false,
shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may
extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.
 106  [Explanation In sections 201 and 202 and in this
section the word "offence", includes any act committed at any place
out of 107[India], which, if committed in 107[India], would
be punishable under any of the following sections, namely, 302, 304, 382, 392,
393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 402, 435, 436, 449, 450, 457, 458, 459 and
460.]', 'BNS Section': '240', 'BNS Heading': 'Giving false information respecting an offence committed', 'BNS description': 'The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
240. Giving false information respecting an offence committed.
Whoever, knowing or having reason to believe that an offence has been committed, gives any information respecting that offence which he knows or believes to be false, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.
Explanation.In sections 238 and 239 and in this section the word "offence" includes any act committed at any place out of India, which, if committed in India, would be punishable under any of the following sections, namely, 103, 105, 307, subsections (2), (3) and (4) of section 309, subsections (2), (3), (4) and (5) of section 310, 311, 312, clauses (f) and (g) of section 326, subsections (4), (6), (7) and (8) of section 331, clauses (a) and (b) of section 332.'}
Discuss the provisions for the destruction of a document to prevent its production as evidence as per Indian Penal Code (IPC 1860) Section 204: Destruction of document to prevent its production as evidence and their relevant Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 (BNS 2023) code reference.

{'IPC Section': '204', 'IPC Heading': 'Destruction of document or electronic record to prevent its production as evidence', 'IPC Descriptions': ' Indian Penal Code, 1860 
204.
Destruction of document to prevent its production as evidence
Whoever secretes or destroys
any document which he may be lawfully compelled to produce as evidence in a
Court of Justice, or in any proceeding lawfully held before a public servant,
as such, or obligates or renders illegible the whole or any part of such
document with the intention of prevention the same from being produced or used
as evidence before such Court or public servant as aforesaid, or after he shall
have been lawfully summoned or required to produce the same for that purpose,
shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may
extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.', 'BNS Section': '241', 'BNS Heading': 'Destruction of document or electronic record to prevent its production as evidence', 'BNS description': 'The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
241. Destruction of document or electronic record to prevent its production as evidence.
Whoever secretes or destroys any document or electronic record which he may be lawfully compelled to produce as evidence in a Court or in any proceeding lawfully held before a public servant, as such, or obliterates or renders illegible the whole or any part of such document or electronic record with the intention of preventing the same from being produced or used as evidence before such Court or public servant as aforesaid, or after he shall have been lawfully summoned or required to produce the same for that purpose, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine which may extend to five thousand rupees, or with both.'}
Explain the consequences of false personation for the purpose of an act or proceeding in a suit or prosecution according to Indian Penal Code (IPC 1860) Section 205: False personation for purpose of act or proceeding in suit or prosecution and their relevant Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 (BNS 2023) code reference.

{'IPC Section': '205', 'IPC Heading': 'False personation for purpose of act or proceeding in suit or prosecution', 'IPC Descriptions': ' Indian Penal Code, 1860 
205. False
personation for purpose of act or proceeding in suit or prosecution
Whoever falsely
personates another, and in such assumed character makes any admission or
statement, or confesses judgment, or causes any process to be issued or becomes
bail or security, or does any other act in any suit or criminal prosecution,
shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may
extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.', 'BNS Section': '242', 'BNS Heading': 'False personation for purpose of act or proceeding in suit or prosecution', 'BNS description': 'The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
242. False Personation for purpose of act or proceeding in suit or prosecution.
Whoever falsely personates another, and in such assumed character makes any admission or statement, or confesses judgment, or causes any process to be issued or becomes bail or security, or does any other act in any suit or criminal prosecution, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.'}
Discuss the legal implications of fraudulent removal or concealment of property to prevent its seizure as forfeited or in execution as outlined in Indian Penal Code (IPC 1860) Section 206: Fraudulent removal or concealment of property to prevent its seizure as forfeited or in execution and their relevant Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 (BNS 2023) code reference.

{'IPC Section': '206', 'IPC Heading': 'Fraudulent removal or concealment of property to prevent its seizure as forfeited or in execution', 'IPC Descriptions': ' Indian Penal Code, 1860 
206.
Fraudulent removal or concealment of property to prevent its seizure as
forfeited or in execution 
Whoever fraudulently
removes, conceals, transfers or delivers to any person any property or any interest
therein, intending thereby to prevent that property or interest there in from
being taken as a forfeiture or in satisfaction of a fine, under a sentence
which has been pronounced, or which he knows to be likely to be pronounced, by
a Court of Justice or other competent authority, or from being taken in
execution of a decree or order which has been made, or which he knows to be
likely to be made by a Court of Justice in a civil suit, shall be punished with
imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or
with fine, or with both.', 'BNS Section': '243', 'BNS Heading': 'Fraudulent removal or concealment of property to prevent its seizure as forfeited or in execution', 'BNS description': 'The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
243. Fraudulent removal or concealment of property to prevent its seizure as forfeited or in execution.
Whoever fraudulently removes, conceals, transfers or delivers to any person any property or any interest therein, intending thereby to prevent that property or interest therein from being taken as a forfeiture or in satisfaction of a fine, under a sentence which has been pronounced, or which he knows to be likely to be pronounced, by a Court or other competent authority, or from being taken in execution of a decree or order which has been made, or which he knows to be likely to be made by a Court in a civil suit, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine which may extend to five thousand rupees, or with both.'}
Explain the provisions for fraudulent claim to property to prevent its seizure as forfeited or in execution as per Indian Penal Code (IPC 1860) Section 207: Fraudulent claim to property to prevent its seizure as forfeited or in execution and their relevant Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 (BNS 2023) code reference.

{'IPC Section': '207', 'IPC Heading': 'Fraudulent claim to property to prevent its seizure as forfeited or in execution', 'IPC Descriptions': ' Indian Penal Code, 1860 
207\tFraudulent claim to property to prevent its seizure as forfeited or in execution
Whoever fraudulently accepts, receives or claims any property or any interest therein, knowing that he has no right or rightful claim to such property or interest, or practises any deception touching any right to any property or any interest therein, intending thereby to prevent that property or interest therein from being taken as a forfeiture or in satisfaction of a fine, under a sentence which has been pronounced, or which he knows to be likely to be pronounced by a Court or other competent authority, or from being taken in execution of a decree or order which has been made, or which he knows to be likely to be made by a Court in a civil suit, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.', 'BNS Section': '244', 'BNS Heading': 'Fraudulent claim to property to prevent its seizure as forfeited or in execution', 'BNS description': 'The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
244\tFraudulent claim to property to prevent its seizure as forfeited or in execution
Whoever fraudulently accepts, receives or claims any property or any interest therein, knowing that he has no right or rightful claim to such property or interest, or practises any deception touching any right to any property or any interest therein, intending thereby to prevent that property or interest therein from being taken as a forfeiture or in satisfaction of a fine, under a sentence which has been pronounced, or which he knows to be likely to be pronounced by a Court or other competent authority, or from being taken in execution of a decree or order which has been made, or which he knows to be likely to be made by a Court in a civil suit, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.'}
Discuss the consequences of fraudulently suffering a decree for a sum not due according to Indian Penal Code (IPC 1860) Section 208: Fraudulently suffering decree for sum not due and their relevant Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 (BNS 2023) code reference.

{'IPC Section': '208', 'IPC Heading': 'Fraudulently suffering decree for sum not due', 'IPC Descriptions': ' Indian Penal Code, 1860 
208\tFraudulently suffering decree for sum not due
Whoever fraudulently causes or suffers a decree or order to be passed against him at the suit of any person for a sum not due or for a larger sum than is due to such person or for any property or interest in property to which such person is not entitled, or fraudulently causes or suffers a decree or order to be executed against him after it has been satisfied, or for anything in respect of which it has been satisfied, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.', 'BNS Section': '245', 'BNS Heading': 'Fraudulently suffering decree for sum not due', 'BNS description': 'The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
245\tFraudulently suffering decree for sum not due
Whoever fraudulently causes or suffers a decree or order to be passed against him at the suit of any person for a sum not due or for a larger sum than is due to such person or for any property or interest in property to which such person is not entitled, or fraudulently causes or suffers a decree or order to be executed against him after it has been satisfied, or for anything in respect of which it has been satisfied, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.  
A institutes a suit against Z. Z, knowing that A is likely to obtain a decree against him, fraudulently suffers a judgment to pass against him for a larger amount at the suit of B, who has no just claim against him, in order that B, either on his own account or for the benefit of Z, may share in the proceeds of any sale of Z’s property which may be made under A’s decree. Z has committed an offence under this section
'}
Explain the legal implications of dishonestly making a false claim in court as outlined in Indian Penal Code (IPC 1860) Section 209: Dishonesty making false claim in Court and their relevant Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 (BNS 2023) code reference.

{'IPC Section': '209', 'IPC Heading': 'Dishonestly making false claim in Court', 'IPC Descriptions': ' Indian Penal Code, 1860 
209.
Dishonestly making false claim in Court
Whoever fraudulently
or dishonestly, or with intent to injure or annoy any person, makes in a Court
of Justice any claim which he knows to be false, shall be punished with
imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years,
and shall also be liable to fine.', 'BNS Section': '246', 'BNS Heading': 'Dishonestly making false claim in Court', 'BNS description': 'The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
246. Dishonestly making false claim in Court.
Whoever fraudulently or dishonestly, or with intent to injure or annoy any person, makes in a Court any claim which he knows to be false, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, and shall also be liable to fine.'}
Explain the consequences of making a false charge of offence with intent to injure according to Indian Penal Code (IPC 1860) Section 211: False charge of offence made with intent to injure and their relevant Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 (BNS 2023) code reference.

{'IPC Section': '211', 'IPC Heading': 'False charge of offence made with intent to injure', 'IPC Descriptions': ' Indian Penal Code, 1860 
211. False
charge of offence made with intent to injure
Whoever, with intent
to cause injury to any person, institutes or causes to be instituted any criminal
proceeding against that person, or falsely charges any person with having
committed an offence, knowing that there is no just or lawful ground for such
proceeding or charge against that person, shall be punished with imprisonment
of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine,
or with both;
and if such criminal
proceeding be instituted on a false charge of an offence punishable with death,
104[imprisonment for life], or imprisonment for seven years or
upwards, shall be punishable with imprisonment of either description for a term
which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.', 'BNS Section': '248', 'BNS Heading': 'False charge of offence made with intent to injure', 'BNS description': 'The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
248. False charge of offence made with intent to injure.
Whoever, with intent to cause injury to any person, institutes or causes to be instituted any criminal proceeding against that person, or falsely charges any person with having committed an offence, knowing that there is no just or lawful ground for such proceeding or charge against that person,
(a) shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to five years, or with fine which may extend to two lakh rupees, or with both;
(b) if such criminal proceeding be instituted on a false charge of an offence punishable with death, imprisonment for life, or imprisonment for ten years or upwards, shall be punishable with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.'}
Explain the provisions for taking a gift or other benefits to screen an offender from punishment according to Indian Penal Code (IPC 1860) Section 213: Taking gift, etc., to screen an offender from punishment and their relevant Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 (BNS 2023) code reference.

{'IPC Section': '213', 'IPC Heading': 'Taking gift, etc., to screen an offender from punishment', 'IPC Descriptions': ' Indian Penal Code, 1860 
213. Taking
gift, etc., to screen an offender from punishment
whoever accepts or
attempts to obtain, or agrees to accept, any gratification for himself or any
other person, or any restitution of property to himself or any other person, in
consideration of his concealing an offence or of his screening any person from
legal punishment for any offence, or of his not proceeding against any person
for the purpose of bringing him to legal punishment,
if a capital offence
shall, if the offence is punishable with death, be punished with imprisonment
of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall
also be liable to fine;
if punishable with
imprisonment for life, or with imprisonment and if the offence is punishable
with 104[imprisonment for life], or with imprisonment which may
extend to ten years, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description
for a term which may extend to three years, and shall also be liable to fine;
and if the offence is
punishable with 104[imprisonment not extending to ten], or with
years, shall be punished with imprisonment of the description provided for the
offence for a term which may extend to onefourth part of the longest term of
imprisonment provided for the offence, or with fine, or with both.', 'BNS Section': '250', 'BNS Heading': 'Taking gift, etc., to screen an offender from punishment', 'BNS description': 'The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
250. Taking gift, etc., to screen an offender from punishment.
Whoever accepts or attempts to obtain, or agrees to accept, any gratification for himself or any other person, or any restitution of property to himself or any other person, in consideration of his concealing an offence or of his screening any person from legal punishment for any offence, or of his not proceeding against any person for the purpose of bringing him to legal punishment shall,
(a) if the offence is punishable with death, be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine;
(b) if the offence is punishable with imprisonment for life, or with imprisonment which may extend to ten years, be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, and shall also be liable to fine;
(c) if the offence is punishable with imprisonment not extending to ten years, be punished with imprisonment of the description provided for the offence for a term which may extend to onefourth part of the longest term of imprisonment provided for the offence, or with fine, or with both.'}
Explain the legal implications of taking a gift to help recover stolen property or other benefits as outlined in Indian Penal Code (IPC 1860) Section 215: Taking gift to help to recover stolen property, etc. and their relevant Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 (BNS 2023) code reference.

{'IPC Section': '215', 'IPC Heading': 'Taking gift to help to recover stolen property, etc.', 'IPC Descriptions': ' Indian Penal Code, 1860 
215. Taking
gift to help to recover stolen property, etc
Whoever takes or
agrees or consents to take any gratification under pretence or on account of
helping any person to recover any movable property of which he shall have been
deprived by any offence punishable under this Code, shall, unless he uses all
means in his power to cause the offender to be apprehended and convicted of the
offence, be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which
may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.', 'BNS Section': '252', 'BNS Heading': 'Taking gift to help to recover stolen property, etc.', 'BNS description': 'The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
252. Taking gift to help to recover stolen property, etc.
Whoever takes or agrees or consents to take any gratification under pretence or on account of helping any person to recover any movable property of which he shall have been deprived by any offence punishable under this Sanhita, shall, unless he uses all means in his power to cause the offender to be apprehended and convicted of the offence, be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.'}
Explain the penalty for harbouring robbers or dacoits according to Indian Penal Code (IPC 1860) Section 216A: Penalty for harbouring robbers or dacoits and their relevant Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 (BNS 2023) code reference.

{'IPC Section': '216A', 'IPC Heading': 'Penalty for harbouring robbers or dacoits', 'IPC Descriptions': ' Indian Penal Code, 1860 
108  [216A. Penalty for harboring robbers or
dacoits
Whoever, knowing or
having reason to believe that any persons are about to commit or have recently
committed robbery or dacoity, harbors them or any of them, with the intention of
facilitating the commission of such robbery or dacoity or of screening them or
any of them from punishment, shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a
term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.
Explanation  For the purposes of this section it is immaterial whether
the robbery or dacoity is intended to be committed, or has been committed,
within or without 109[India]. 
Exception  This provision does not extend to the case in which the
harbor is by the husband or wife of the offender.]', 'BNS Section': '254', 'BNS Heading': 'Penalty for harbouring robbers or dacoits', 'BNS description': 'The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
254. Penalty for Harbouring robbers or dacoits.
Whoever, knowing or having reason to believe that any persons are about to commit or have recently committed robbery or dacoity, harbours them or any of them, with the intention of facilitating the commission of such robbery or dacoity, or of screening them or any of them from punishment, shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.
Explanation.For the purposes of this section it is immaterial whether the robbery or dacoity is intended to be committed, or has been committed, within or without India.
Exception.The provisions of this section do not extend to the case in which the harbour is by the spouse of the offender.'}
Discuss the historical context and implications of the repealed section regarding the definition of 'harbour' in sections 212, 216 and 216A as outlined in Indian Penal Code (IPC 1860) Section 216B: (Repealed) Definition of “harbour” in sections 212, 216 and 216A and their relevant Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 (BNS 2023) code reference.

{'IPC Section': '216B', 'IPC Heading': 'Definition of “harbour” in sections 212, 216 and 216A', 'IPC Descriptions': 'Section 216B of the Indian Penal Code has been removed from the law by the Indian Penal Code (Amendment) Act, 1942 (8 of 1942), S. 3.', 'BNS Section': '2(13)', 'BNS Heading': 'Definitions', 'BNS description': 'The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
2. Definitions
(13) "harbour" includes supplying a person with shelter, food, drink, money, clothes, arms, ammunition or means of conveyance, or the assisting a person by any means, whether of the same kind as those enumerated in this clause or not, to evade apprehension;'}
Explain the legal implications of a public servant disobeying the direction of law with intent to save a person from punishment or property from forfeiture according to Indian Penal Code (IPC 1860) Section 217: Public servant disobeying direction of law with intent to save person from punishment or property from forfeiture and their relevant Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 (BNS 2023) code reference.

{'IPC Section': '217', 'IPC Heading': 'Public servant disobeying direction of law with intent to save person from punishment or property from forfeiture', 'IPC Descriptions': '" Indian Penal Code, 1860 
217. Public
servant disobeying direction of law with intent to save person from punishment
or property from forfeiture 
Whoever, being a
public servant, knowingly disobeys any direction of the law as to the way in
which he is to conduct himself as such public servant, intending thereby to
save, or knowing it to be likely that he will thereby save, any person from legal
punishment, or subject him to a less punishment than that to which he is
liable, or with intent to save, or knowing that he is likely thereby to save,
any property from forfeiture or any charge to which it is liable by law, shall
be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend
to two years, or with fine, or with both."', 'BNS Section': '255', 'BNS Heading': 'Public servant disobeying direction of law with intent to save person from punishment or property from forfeiture', 'BNS description': 'The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
255. Public servant Disobeying direction of law with intent to save person from punishment or property from forfeiture.
Whoever, being a public servant, knowingly disobeys any direction of the law as to the way in which he is to conduct himself as such public servant, intending thereby to save, or knowing it to be likely that he will thereby save, any person from legal punishment, or subject him to a less punishment than that to which he is liable, or with intent to save, or knowing that he is likely thereby to save, any property from forfeiture or any charge to which it is liable by law, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.'}
Discuss the provisions for a public servant framing an incorrect record or writing with intent to save a person from punishment or property from forfeiture as per Indian Penal Code (IPC 1860) Section 218: Public servant framing incorrect record or writing with intent to save person from punishment or property from forfeiture and their relevant Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 (BNS 2023) code reference.

{'IPC Section': '218', 'IPC Heading': 'Public servant framing incorrect record or writing with intent to save person from punishment or property from forfeiture', 'IPC Descriptions': ' Indian Penal Code, 1860 
218. Public
servant framing incorrect record or writing with intent to save person from
punishment or property from forfeiture 
Whoever, being a
public servant, and being as such public servant, charged with the preparation
of any record or other writing, frames that record or writing in a manner which
he knows to be incorrect, with intent to cause, or knowing it to be likely that
he will thereby cause, loss or injury to the public or to any person, or with
intent thereby to save, or knowing it to be likely that he will thereby save,
any person from legal punishment, or with intent to save, or knowing that he is
likely thereby to save, any property from forfeiture or other charge to which
it is liable by law, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description
for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.', 'BNS Section': '256', 'BNS Heading': 'Public servant framing incorrect record or writing with intent to save person from punishment or property from forfeiture', 'BNS description': 'The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
256. Public servant framing incorrect record or writing with intent to save person from punishment or property from forfeiture.
Whoever, being a public servant, and being as such public servant, charged with the preparation of any record or other writing, frames that record or writing in a manner which he knows to be incorrect, with intent to cause, or knowing it to be likely that he will thereby cause, loss or injury to the public or to any person, or with intent thereby to save, or knowing it to be likely that he will thereby save, any person from legal punishment, or with intent to save, or knowing that he is likely thereby to save, any property from forfeiture or other charge to which it is liable by law, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.'}
Explain the consequences of a public servant in a judicial proceeding corruptly making a report or acting contrary to law as outlined in Indian Penal Code (IPC 1860) Section 219: Public servant in judicial proceeding corruptly making report, etc., contrary to law and their relevant Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 (BNS 2023) code reference.

{'IPC Section': '219', 'IPC Heading': 'Public servant in judicial proceeding corruptly making report, etc., contrary to law', 'IPC Descriptions': ' Indian Penal Code, 1860 
219. Public
servant in judicial proceeding corruptly making report, etc., contrary to law
Whoever, being a
public servant, corruptly or maliciously makes or pronounces in any stage of a
judicial proceeding, any report, order, verdict, or decision which he knows to be
contrary to law, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for
a term which may extend to seven years, or with fine, or with both.', 'BNS Section': '257', 'BNS Heading': 'Public servant in judicial proceeding corruptly making report, etc., contrary to law', 'BNS description': 'The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
257. Public servant in judicial proceeding corruptly making report, etc., contrary to law.
Whoever, being a public servant, corruptly or maliciously makes or pronounces in any stage of a judicial proceeding, any report, order, verdict, or decision which he knows to be contrary to law, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, or with fine, or with both.'}
Discuss the legal implications of commitment for trial or confinement by a person having authority who knows that he is acting contrary to law according to Indian Penal Code (IPC 1860) Section 220: Commitment for trial or confinement by person having authority who knows that he is acting contrary to law and their relevant Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 (BNS 2023) code reference.Explain the legal implications of intentional omission to apprehend on the part of a public servant bound to apprehend as per Indian Penal Code (IPC 1860) Section 221: Intentional omission to apprehend on the part of public servant bound to apprehend and their relevant Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 (BNS 2023) code reference.

{'IPC Section': '220', 'IPC Heading': 'Commitment for trial or confinement by person having authority who knows that he is acting contrary to law', 'IPC Descriptions': ' Indian Penal Code, 1860 
220.
Commitment for trial or confinement by person having authority who knows that
he is acting contrary to law 
Whoever, being in any
office which gives him legal authority to commit persons for trial or to
commitment, or to keep persons in confinement, corruptly or maliciously commits
any person for trial or to confinement, or keeps any person in confinement, in
the exercise of that authority knowing that in so doing he is acting contrary
to law, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term
which may extend to seven years, or with fine, or with both.', 'BNS Section': '258', 'BNS Heading': 'Commitment for trial or confinement by person having authority who knows that he is acting contrary to law', 'BNS description': 'The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
258. Commitment for trial or confinement by person having authority who knows that he is acting contrary to law.
Whoever, being in any office which gives him legal authority to commit persons for trial or to confinement, or to keep persons in confinement, corruptly or maliciously commits any person for trial or to confinement, or keeps any person in confinement, in the exercise of that authority knowing that in so doing he is acting contrary to law, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, or with fine, or with both.'}
Explain the legal implications of escape from confinement or custody negligently suffered by a public servant as outlined in Indian Penal Code (IPC 1860) Section 223: Escape from confinement or custody negligently suffered by public servant and their relevant Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 (BNS 2023) code reference.

{'IPC Section': '223', 'IPC Heading': 'Escape from confinement or custody negligently suffered by public servant', 'IPC Descriptions': ' Indian Penal Code, 1860 
223. Escape
from confinement or custody negligently suffered by public servant
Whoever, being a
public servant legally bound as such public servant to keep in confinement any
person charged with or convicted of any offence 120[or lawfully
committed to custody], negligently suffers such person to escape from
confinement, shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may
extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.', 'BNS Section': '261', 'BNS Heading': 'Escape from confinement or custody negligently suffered by public servant', 'BNS description': 'The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
261. Escape from Confinement or custody negligently suffered by public servant.
Whoever, being a public servant legally bound as such public servant to keep in confinement any person charged with or convicted of any offence or lawfully committed to custody, negligently suffers such person to escape from confinement, shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.'}
Discuss the provisions for resistance or obstruction by a person to his lawful apprehension as per Indian Penal Code (IPC 1860) Section 224: Resistance or obstruction by a person to his lawful apprehension and their relevant Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 (BNS 2023) code reference.

{'IPC Section': '224', 'IPC Heading': 'Resistance or obstruction by a person to his lawful apprehension', 'IPC Descriptions': ' Indian Penal Code, 1860 
224.
Resistance or obstruction by a person to his lawful apprehension
Whoever intentionally
offers any resistance or illegal obstruction to the lawful apprehension of
himself for any offence with which he is charged or of which he has been
convicted, or escapes or attempts to escape from any custody in which he is
lawfully detained for any such offence, shall be punished with imprisonment of
either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or
with both.
Explanation  The punishment in this section is in addition to the
punishment for which the person to be apprehended or detained in custody was
liable for the offence with which he was charged, or of which he was convicted.', 'BNS Section': '262', 'BNS Heading': 'Resistance or obstruction by a person to his lawful apprehension', 'BNS description': 'The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
262. Resistance or obstruction by a person to his lawful apprehension.
Whoever intentionally offers any resistance or illegal obstruction to the lawful apprehension of himself for any offence with which he is charged or of which he has been convicted, or escapes or attempts to escape from any custody in which he is lawfully detained for any such offence, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.
Explanation.The punishment in this section is in addition to the punishment for which the person to be apprehended or detained in custody was liable for the offence with which he was charged, or of which he was convicted.'}
Discuss the legal implications of omission to apprehend, or sufferance of escape, on the part of a public servant in cases not otherwise provided for as outlined in Indian Penal Code (IPC 1860) Section 225A: Omission to apprehend, or sufferance of escape, on part of public servant, in cases not otherwise, provided for and their relevant Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 (BNS 2023) code reference.

{'IPC Section': '225A', 'IPC Heading': 'Omission to apprehend, or sufferance of escape, on part of public servant, in cases not otherwise provided for', 'IPC Descriptions': ' Indian Penal Code, 1860 
122 [225A. Omission to apprehend, or
sufferance of escape, on part of public servant, in cases not otherwise,
provided for
Whoever, being a
public servant legally bound as such public servant to apprehend, or to keep in
confinement, any person in any case not provided for in section 221, section
222 or section 223, or in any other law for the time being in force, omits to
apprehend that person or suffers him to escape from confinement, shall be
punished
(a) if he does so
intentionally, with imprisonment of either description for a term which may
extend to three years, or with fine, or with both; and
(b) if he does so
negligently, with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years,
or with fine, or with both.', 'BNS Section': '264', 'BNS Heading': 'Omission to apprehend, or sufferance of escape, on part of public servant, in cases not otherwise provided for', 'BNS description': 'The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
264. Omission to apprehend, or sufferance of escape, on part of public servant, in cases not otherwise provided for.
Whoever, being a public servant legally bound as such public servant to apprehend, or to keep in confinement, any person in any case not provided for in section 259, section 260 or section 261, or in any other law for the time being in force, omits to apprehend that person or suffers him to escape from confinement, shall be punished
(a) if he does so intentionally, with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both; and
(b) if he does so negligently, with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.'}
Explain the provisions for resistance or obstruction to lawful apprehension, or escape or rescue in cases not otherwise provided for as per Indian Penal Code (IPC 1860) Section 225B: Resistance or obstruction to lawful apprehension, or escape or rescue in cases not otherwise provided for and their relevant Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 (BNS 2023) code reference.

{'IPC Section': '225B', 'IPC Heading': 'Resistance or obstruction to lawful apprehension, or escape or rescue, in cases not otherwise provided for', 'IPC Descriptions': ' Indian Penal Code, 1860 
225B. Resistance
or obstruction to lawful apprehension, or escape or rescue in cases not
otherwise provided for 
Whoever, in any case
not provided for in section 224 or section 225 or in any other law for the time
being in force, intentionally offers any resistance or illegal obstruction to
the lawful apprehension of himself or of any other person, or escapes or
attempts to escape from any custody in which he is lawfully detained, or
rescues or attempts to rescue any other person from any custody in which that person
is lawfully detained, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description
for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine, or with both.]', 'BNS Section': '265', 'BNS Heading': 'Resistance or obstruction to lawful apprehension, or escape or rescue, in cases not otherwise provided for', 'BNS description': 'The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
265. Resistance or obstruction to lawful apprehension or escape or rescue in cases not otherwise provided for.
Whoever, in any case not provided for in section 262 or section 263 or in any other law for the time being in force, intentionally offers any resistance or illegal obstruction to the lawful apprehension of himself or of any other person, or escapes or attempts to escape from any custody in which he is lawfully detained, or rescues or attempts to rescue any other person from any custody in which that person is lawfully detained, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine, or with both.'}
Discuss the historical context and implications of the repealed section regarding unlawful return from transportation according to Indian Penal Code (IPC 1860) Section 226: (Repealed) Unlawful return from transportation and their relevant Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 (BNS 2023) code reference.

IPC Section: 226
IPC Heading: Unlawful return from transportation
IPC Descriptions: Section 226 of the Indian Penal Code has been repealed by the Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1955 (26 of 1955), section 117 and Schedule.
BNS Section: Repealed in BNS
BNS Heading: Repealed in BNS
BNS description: Repealed in BNS
Explain the legal implications of violation of condition of remission of punishment as outlined in Indian Penal Code (IPC 1860) Section 227: Violation of condition of remission of punishment and their relevant Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 (BNS 2023) code reference.

{'IPC Section': '227', 'IPC Heading': 'Violation of condition of remission of punishment', 'IPC Descriptions': ' Indian Penal Code, 1860 
227.
Violation of condition of remission of punishment
Whoever, having
accepted any conditional remission of punishment, knowingly violates any
condition on which such remission was granted, shall be punished with the punishment
to which he was originally sentenced, if he has already suffered no part of
that punishment, and if he has suffered any part of that punishment, then with
so much of that punishment as he has not already suffered.', 'BNS Section': '266', 'BNS Heading': 'Violation of condition of remission of punishment', 'BNS description': 'The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
266. Violation of condition of remission of punishment.
Whoever, having accepted any conditional remission of punishment, knowingly violates any condition on which such remission was granted, shall be punished with the punishment to which he was originally sentenced, if he has already suffered no part of that punishment, and if he has suffered any part of that punishment, then with so much of that punishment as he has not already suffered.'}
Discuss the provisions for intentional insult or interruption to a public servant sitting in judicial proceeding as per Indian Penal Code (IPC 1860) Section 228: Intentional insult or interruption to public servant sitting in judicial proceeding and their relevant Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 (BNS 2023) code reference.

{'IPC Section': '228', 'IPC Heading': 'Intentional insult or interruption to public servant sitting in judicial proceeding', 'IPC Descriptions': ' Indian Penal Code, 1860 
228.
Intentional insult or interruption to public servant sitting in judicial
proceeding 
Whoever intentionally
offers any insult, or causes any interruption to any public servant, while such
public servant is sitting in any stage of a judicial proceeding, shall be
punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months, or
with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both.', 'BNS Section': '267', 'BNS Heading': 'Intentional insult or interruption to public servant sitting in judicial proceeding', 'BNS description': 'The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
267. Intentional insult or interruption to public servant sitting in judicial proceeding.
Whoever, intentionally offers any insult, or causes any interruption to any public servant, while such public servant is sitting in any stage of a judicial proceeding, shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to five thousand rupees, or with both.'}
Discuss the legal implications of personation of a juror or assessor as outlined in Indian Penal Code (IPC 1860) Section 229: Personation of a juror or assessor and their relevant Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 (BNS 2023) code reference.

{'IPC Section': '229', 'IPC Heading': 'Personation of a juror or assessor', 'IPC Descriptions': ' Indian Penal Code, 1860 
229.
Personation of a juror or assessor 
Whoever, by
personation or otherwise, shall intentionally cause, or knowingly suffer himself
to be returned, empanelled or sworn as a juryman or assessor in any case in
which he knows that he is not entitled by law to be so returned, empanelled or
sworn, or knowing himself to have been so returned, empanelled or sworn
contrary to law, shall voluntarily serve on such jury or as such assessor,
shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may
extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.', 'BNS Section': '268', 'BNS Heading': 'Personation of assessor', 'BNS description': 'The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
268. Personation of assessor.
Whoever, by personation or otherwise, shall intentionally cause, or knowingly suffer himself to be returned, empanelled or sworn as an assessor in any case in which he knows that he is not entitled by law to be so returned, empanelled or sworn, or knowing himself to have been so returned, empanelled or sworn contrary to law, shall voluntarily serve as such assessor, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.'}
Explain theFailure by person released on bail or bond to appear in Court  as per Indian Penal Code (IPC 1860) Section 229A	Failure by person released on bail or bond to appear in Court and their relevant Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 (BNS 2023) code reference.

{'IPC Section': '229A', 'IPC Heading': 'Failure by person released on bail or bond to appear in Court', 'IPC Descriptions': ' Indian Penal Code, 1860 
229A\tFailure by person released on bail or bond to appear in Court
Whoever, having been charged with an offence and released on bail or on bond without sureties, fails without sufficient cause (the burden of proving which shall lie upon him), to appear in Court in accordance with the terms of the bail or bond, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine, or with both.
', 'BNS Section': '269', 'BNS Heading': 'Failure by person released on bail or bond to appear in Court', 'BNS description': 'The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
269. Failure by person released on bail bond or bond to appear in Court.
Whoever, having been charged with an offence and released on bail bond or on bond, fails without sufficient cause (the burden of proving which shall lie upon him), to appear in Court in accordance with the terms of the bail or bond, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine, or with both.
Explanation.The punishment under this section is
(a) in addition to the punishment to which the offender would be liable on a conviction for the offence with which he has been charged; and
(b) without prejudice to the power of the Court to order forfeiture of the bond.'}