Public procurement notice: Contract Award Notice
Published: 2023-01-13
Buyer: Metroselskabet I/S
Country: DK
Contract type: Supplies
Procedure: Negotiated procedure
CPV classification: 48612000: Database-management system | 72200000
Estimated value: 1303039 EUR
Award criteria: The most economic tender

Technical requirements: Copenhagen Metro has relatively young assets and has until now not had a need for major reinvestments. As the assets mature, the need for a reinvestment strategy to support the reinvestment plans becomes stronger. Therefore, Copenhagen Metro would like to invest in an Asset Investment Planning tool that is built on a solid foundation, utilizing knowledge and best practice from peers regarding reinvestment levels. A basis for the tool should be maintaining current performance, thus at the same time neither under nor overinvesting. Furthermore, the tool should be able to use the company’s KPI’s (Service availability, Customer satisfaction, Safety, Capacity and Climate Footprint) actively in the investment planning and quickly build different scenarios accordingly. The tool will be able to assist in balancing reinvestment decisions with the maintenance strategy and decisions.
In the ESPD-document the applicant must declare whether the applicant is affected by the grounds of exclusion in §§ 135, 136 or 137, no. 1 or 2 of the Danish Public Procurement Act as well as the applicant must fill in information on economic and financial standing and technical and professional ability.
The European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) is a self-declaration of the businesses' financial status, abilities and suitability for a public procurement procedure. It is available in all EU languages and used as a preliminary evidence of fulfilment of the conditions required in public procurement procedures across the EU.
If the applicant is a consortium each member of the consortium must fill in an individual ESPD-document. If the applicant is based on the financial and/or technical capacity of a third party, such third party must fill in and sign an individual ESPD-document.
The client may at any time during the tendering procedure request that the applicant presents documentation to prove that there is no basis for exclusion from the process as set out in section 135(1) or (3) or section 137(1) para 1 or 2 of the Danish Public Procurement Act (see sections 10 and 11 of the Implementation Order) and to prove that the minimum compliance requirements are met, whenever this is necessary to carry out the procedure correctly. In such cases the client will fix an appropriate deadline for the tenderer's submission of the documentation.
Before the award of the contract to the Tenderer who has submitted the tender representing the BPQR Metroselskabet will ask the Tenderer to send the documentation to prove that there is no basis for exclusion from the process as set in section 135 (1) and (3) or section 137 (1) para 1 or 2 of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
Pursuant to Act no. 593 of 2.6.2016 on the Complaints Board for Tenders, the following deadlines apply for the execution of tenders: - complaints about not being selected must be submitted to the Complaints Board for Tenders within 20 calendar days from the day after sending notification to those affected applicants as to who has been selected, cf. § 7, para. 1, in accordance with Act no. 593 of 2.6.2016 on the Complaints Board for Tenders - other complaints about the tender must be submitted to the Complaints Board no later than 45 calendar days after the contractor has published an executive order in Official. Official Journal of the European Union stating that the contracting party has concluded a contract. The time limit is calculated from the day after the day on which the executive order is published, cf. § 7, para. 2.1, in accordance with Act no. 593 of 2.6.2016 on the Complaints Board for Tenders. At the latest at the time when a complaint is submitted to the Complaints Board for the procurement, the complainant must notify the author in writing that the complaint has been submitted to the Complaints Board for procurement and whether the complaint has been submitted during the standstill period. , cf. § 3 pieces. 1, in accordance with Act no. 593 of 2.6.2016 on the Procurement Appeals Board.


Winner: Copperleaf Technologies Inc.
Award value: 1303039