Public procurement notice: Additional Information
Published: 2016-03-15
Buyer: Forsvarets logistikkorganisasjon (FLO) (The Norwegian Defence Logistics Organisation)
Country: NO
Region: NORGE
Contract type: Services
Procedure: Open procedure
CPV classification: 60000000 | 60140000 | 60400000: Air transport services | 60410000: Scheduled air transport services
Award criteria: The most economic tender

Technical requirements: Pursuant to PPR § 22-1 the Contracting Authority can cancel the competition with immediate effect if there is justifiable cause. Case law and judicial theory have deduced that there is an obligation to cancel if the discrepancy could have affected participation in the competition, for example hindered tenderers from participating, with reference to the basic requirements in LOA § 5 to non-discrimination and competition, see for example LE-2011-40623l.
The current competition was announced with an estimated value of 4 000 000 NOK over 4 years. Based on price offers, FLO sees that the value of the framework agreement changes significantly, in such a way that it is reasonable to assume that other tenderers may have been interested in participating in the competition if they had been clear over the new value. As this cannot be corrected in any other way, FLO is obliged to cancel the competition.
Pursuant to PPR § 22-1 the Contracting Authority can cancel the competition with immediate effect if there is justifiable cause. Case law and judicial theory have deduced that there is an obligation to cancel if the discrepancy could have affected participation in the competition, for example hindered tenderers from participating, with reference to the basic requirements in LOA § 5 to non-discrimination and competition, see for example LE-2011-40623l.
The current competition was announced with an estimated value of 4 000 000 NOK over 4 years. Based on price offers, FLO sees that the value of the framework agreement changes significantly, in such a way that it is reasonable to assume that other tenderers may have been interested in participating in the competition if they had been clear over the new value. As this cannot be corrected in any other way, FLO is obliged to cancel the competition.
Pursuant to PPR § 22-1 the Contracting Authority can cancel the competition with immediate effect if there is justifiable cause. Case law and judicial theory have deduced that there is an obligation to cancel if the discrepancy could have affected participation in the competition, for example hindered tenderers from participating, with reference to the basic requirements in LOA § 5 to non-discrimination and competition, see for example LE-2011-40623l.
The current competition was announced with an estimated value of 4 000 000 NOK over 4 years. Based on price offers, FLO sees that the value of the framework agreement changes significantly, in such a way that it is reasonable to assume that other tenderers may have been interested in participating in the competition if they had been clear over the new value. As this cannot be corrected in any other way, FLO is obliged to cancel the competition.
Pursuant to PPR § 22-1 the Contracting Authority can cancel the competition with immediate effect if there is justifiable cause. Case law and judicial theory have deduced that there is an obligation to cancel if the discrepancy could have affected participation in the competition, for example hindered tenderers from participating, with reference to the basic requirements in LOA § 5 to non-discrimination and competition, see for example LE-2011-40623l.
The current competition was announced with an estimated value of 4 000 000 NOK over 4 years. Based on price offers, FLO sees that the value of the framework agreement changes significantly, in such a way that it is reasonable to assume that other tenderers may have been interested in participating in the competition if they had been clear over the new value. As this cannot be corrected in any other way, FLO is obliged to cancel the competition.
Pursuant to PPR § 22-1 the Contracting Authority can cancel the competition with immediate effect if there is justifiable cause. Case law and judicial theory have deduced that there is an obligation to cancel if the discrepancy could have affected participation in the competition, for example hindered tenderers from participating, with reference to the basic requirements in LOA § 5 to non-discrimination and competition, see for example LE-2011-40623l.
The current competition was announced with an estimated value of 4 000 000 NOK over 4 years. Based on price offers, FLO sees that the value of the framework agreement changes significantly, in such a way that it is reasonable to assume that other tenderers may have been interested in participating in the competition if they had been clear over the new value. As this cannot be corrected in any other way, FLO is obliged to cancel the competition.
Pursuant to PPR § 22-1 the Contracting Authority can cancel the competition with immediate effect if there is justifiable cause. Case law and judicial theory have deduced that there is an obligation to cancel if the discrepancy could have affected participation in the competition, for example hindered tenderers from participating, with reference to the basic requirements in LOA § 5 to non-discrimination and competition, see for example LE-2011-40623l.
The current competition was announced with an estimated value of 4 000 000 NOK over 4 years. Based on price offers, FLO sees that the value of the framework agreement changes significantly, in such a way that it is reasonable to assume that other tenderers may have been interested in participating in the competition if they had been clear over the new value. As this cannot be corrected in any other way, FLO is obliged to cancel the competition.
Pursuant to PPR § 22-1 the Contracting Authority can cancel the competition with immediate effect if there is justifiable cause. Case law and judicial theory have deduced that there is an obligation to cancel if the discrepancy could have affected participation in the competition, for example hindered tenderers from participating, with reference to the basic requirements in LOA § 5 to non-discrimination and competition, see for example LE-2011-40623l.
The current competition was announced with an estimated value of 4 000 000 NOK over 4 years. Based on price offers, FLO sees that the value of the framework agreement changes significantly, in such a way that it is reasonable to assume that other tenderers may have been interested in participating in the competition if they had been clear over the new value. As this cannot be corrected in any other way, FLO is obliged to cancel the competition.
Pursuant to PPR § 22-1 the Contracting Authority can cancel the competition with immediate effect if there is justifiable cause. Case law and judicial theory have deduced that there is an obligation to cancel if the discrepancy could have affected participation in the competition, for example hindered tenderers from participating, with reference to the basic requirements in LOA § 5 to non-discrimination and competition, see for example LE-2011-40623l.