Public procurement notice: Contract Notice
Published: 2025-05-19
Buyer: Vestvågøy kommune
Country: NO
Region: NO071
Contract type: Services
Procedure: Negotiated with prior call for competition
CPV classification: 32500000 | 33195000 | 35121100 | 35121700 | 35125100: Sensors
Estimated value: 7000000 NOK
Submission deadline: 2025-06-02
Award criteria: price, quality

Technical requirements: Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a enforceable verdict has been convicted of corruption by a verdict handed down not more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Corruption as defined in Article 3 of the Convention on Combating Corruption, Involving European Communities or European Union Member States (EUT C 195 of 25.6.1997, s. 1), and in Article 2, point 1, in the Council ́s framework decision 2003/568/RIA of 22 July 2003 on combating corruption in the private sector (EUT L 192 of 31.7.2003,  p. 54). This rejection reason also includes corruption as defined in national law for the contracting authority or supplier.
Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, at the time a legally convicted of fraud has been convicted of fraud by a verdict handed down not more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Fraud included in Article 1 of the Convention on protection of the Financial Interests of the European Communities (EFT C 316 of 27.11.1995, p. 48).
Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of money laundering or financing terrorism by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set out directly in the judgement that still applies? Money laundering or financing terrorism As defined in Article 1 of the European Parliament and Council Directive 2005/60/EF of 26 October 2005 on preventive measures against the use of the financial system for money laundering and financing terrorism (EUT L 309 of 25.11.2005, p. 15).
Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, at the time a legally convicted verdict of participation in a criminal organisation by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set out directly in the judgement that still applies? Participation in a criminal organisation as defined in Article 2 of the Council ́s framework decision 2008/841/RIA of 24 October 2008 on control of organised crime (EUT L 300 of 11.11.2008, p. 42)
Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body, or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of acts of terrorism or criminal acts connected to terrorist activities by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set out directly in the judgement that still applies? Acts of terrorism or criminal acts relating to terrorist activity as defined in Article 1 and 3 of the Council ́s framework decision 2002/475/RIA of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (EFT L 164, af 22.6.2002, p. 3). This rejection reason also includes incitement to, participation or attempts to commit such actions as included in Article 4 in the mentioned framework decision.

Eligibility requirements: Criteria 1 - 50% - The tenderer ́s experience with equivalent assignments. 
· The degree of comparable assignments that are relevant for this procurement will be assessed under this criteria.
Criteria 2 - 50% - The consultants ́ competence
· Under this criteria, the degree of personnel who shall carry out the assignment will be assessed has competence within the areas that shall be carried out.
Price set up that clarifies the costs
Emphasis will be put on, among other things,
- Fulfilment of criteria in the requirement specifications/function requirements is general, cf. annex 1, function requirements.
- Functionality, user friendliness, compatibility and innovative solutions.
"Each module is so well integrated that the system appears as a whole.
- References for equivalent deliveries that are in operative operation.
- Cf. function requirements point 4.1, 6.1, 6.2, 6.3
The competition is for the complete procurement of a new IP based patient signalling system for Lekneshagen shared housing. The nursing home has 4 wings with 8 patient rooms, 2 wings with nine patient rooms and 2 wings with 4 patient rooms, particularly adapted for screening, total 58 single rooms.