Public procurement notice: Contract Notice
Published: 2018-05-09
Buyer: Danish Defence Acquisition and Logistics Organizations
Country: DK
Contract type: Services
Procedure: Restricted procedure
CPV classification: 35640000 | 50000000 | 50211000: Repair and maintenance services of aircraft | 50211100: Aircraft maintenance services | 50211200: Aircraft repair services
Estimated value:  USD
Submission deadline: 2018-06-12
Award criteria: Lowest price

Technical requirements: Sustainment of Pratt and Whitney F100-220 engine components on the General Dynamics F-16. The service required from the provider to DALO is to supply overhaul / repair / modify components, which have been processed through a shopvisit and thereby have been made serviceable and functional again, and eligible to be re-installed in an Aircraft again. The following services are required from the supplier:
Lot 1 includes 17 different engine parts / services, please see Appendix A.1 and C.1 to the framework agreement for details.
Lot 2 includes 4 different engine parts / services, please see Appendix A.1 and C.1 to the framework agreement for details.
Reference is made to the tender documents regarding payment terms. Invoicing must be done in accordance with the applicable Danish legislation on public payments. At present, this is Danish consolidation act. nº 798 of June 2007 which requires invoicing to be done electronically. Exact terms will be stated in the contract.
No particular legal form is required. If the contract is awarded to a group of suppliers (e.g. a consortium), the participants are required to undertake joint and several liabilities and to appoint one supplier to represent the group.
The contract / framework agreement must be conducted in consideration of corporate social responsibility and it contains a labour caluse, please see Appendix B for further information.
When submitting the offers (but not the request for participation), the tenderers must submit a solemn declaration stating to which degree the tenderer has unpaid overdue debt in relation to tax, duties or social security contributions under Danish law or under the law of the country in which the tenderer is established. A template for the declaration will be provided with the tender documents, and the tenderer is encouraged — but not obliged — to use it. Be advised, that DALO shall exclude a tenderer which has unpaid overdue debt of 100 000 DKK or more to public authorities in relation to tax, duties or social security contributions under Danish law or under the law of the country in which the tenderer is established. However, DALO may not exclude a tenderer which has provided sufficient documentation that the tenderer is reliable. DALO will decide whether the documentation is sufficient, hence the tenderer is considered reliable, based on the guidelines equal to the guidelines provided for in Section 138(1-4) of the Danish Act nº 1564 of 15.12.2015 — The Public Procurement Act.
A list of the most important similar deliveries (references), cf. Section II.1.5) in regards to the lot or lots which the candidate has requested to participate, carried out within the past 2 years prior to the deadline for the request to participate. Only the deliveries (references) performed at the time of the deadline for the request to participate will be considered when assessing if the minimum requirement for suitability stated below is fulfilled and which candidate has documented the most relevant previous deliveries, cf. Section IV.1.2). If the delivery in question is ongoing, it is only the part of the services performed and completed at the time of the deadline for the request to participate which will be included in the assessment of the delivery (reference). The list should preferably include a short description of each delivery. The description of the deliveries should include a clear indication of which specific parts the deliveries are similar to the services described in Section II.1.5, in regards to the lot or lots which the candidate has requested to participate. The description should also include a description of the candidates participation / role in the performance of the deliveries. The description should also contain information on the date of the deliveries, the size and value of the deliveries, the recipients of the deliveries (specific names / countries are preferred, but not necessary; if no country specific information is included, the candidate is asked to provide as much generic information as possible about the delivery). When specifying the date for the deliveries, the candidate should state the date for the commencement and completion of the deliveries. If this is not possible, e.g. because the delivery in question is performed on an ongoing basis according to a framework agreement, the description of the deliveries should nonetheless contain information on how the date is set. The list must contain a maximum of 5 previous deliveries, whether the candidate is one entity, composed of a group of entities (e.g. consortium), including temporary joint ventures, or relies on the technical and professional capacity of other entities. If the list contains more than 5, DALO will only consider the first 5 deliveries on the list. Deliveries beyond that will be disregarded. Please note that a candidate may rely on the technical and professional capacity of other entities (e.g. a parent or sister company or a sub-supplier), irrespective of the legal nature of the relations between the candidate and the entity or entities on which the candidate relies.
The candidate must demonstrate experience with as a minimum one similar delivery within the past 2 years prior to the deadline for the request to participate.
A “similar delivery” shall be understood as services similar to the services described in Section II.1.5).
The limitation of candidates will be based on an evaluation of which candidates have documented the most relevant previous deliveries in comparison to the contract / purchases described in Section II.1.5) above in regards to the lot or lots which the candidate has requested to participate, in terms of the nature and quantity of the previous deliveries. The evaluation will be based on the list of references submitted by the candidates according to Section III.2.3). Please note that any ambiguities and/or incomprehensibilities in the information submitted may be regarded negatively in the evaluation when selecting the limited numbers of candidates.
Please note, that each candidate can only submit one request for participation. If the same legal entity is a part of or in any other way participates in several applications, e.g. submits his own application and at the same time participates in a consortium which also applies, the candidates shall ensure that the same legal entity’s participation does not provide for opportunity for mutual coordination of their applications and offers. DALO reserves the right to request the candidates to establish and reassure DALO that the same legal entity’s participation does not threaten the transparency and distort competition between the tenderers.
DALO reserves the right — but is not obliged — to use remedies equal to the remedies provided for in Section 159(5) of the Danish Act nº 1564 of 15.12.2015, the Public Procurement Act, if applications or tenders do not fulfil the formalities of the tender documents.
DALO demands that the candidate and each of the legal entities whose capacities the candidate relies on undertake joint and several liability for the performance of the contract.
Candidates are asked to submit their request to participate via ETHICS. The permalink is stated in Section I.1). The request to participate cannot be submitted by email.

Eligibility requirements: A list of the most important similar deliveries (references), cf. Section II.1.5) in regards to the lot or lots which the candidate has requested to participate, carried out within the past 2 years prior to the deadline for the request to participate. Only the deliveries (references) performed at the time of the deadline for the request to participate will be considered when assessing if the minimum requirement for suitability stated below is fulfilled and which candidate has documented the most relevant previous deliveries, cf. Section IV.1.2). If the delivery in question is ongoing, it is only the part of the services performed and completed at the time of the deadline for the request to participate which will be included in the assessment of the delivery (reference). The list should preferably include a short description of each delivery. The description of the deliveries should include a clear indication of which specific parts the deliveries are similar to the services described in Section II.1.5, in regards to the lot or lots which the candidate has requested to participate. The description should also include a description of the candidates participation / role in the performance of the deliveries. The description should also contain information on the date of the deliveries, the size and value of the deliveries, the recipients of the deliveries (specific names / countries are preferred, but not necessary; if no country specific information is included, the candidate is asked to provide as much generic information as possible about the delivery). When specifying the date for the deliveries, the candidate should state the date for the commencement and completion of the deliveries. If this is not possible, e.g. because the delivery in question is performed on an ongoing basis according to a framework agreement, the description of the deliveries should nonetheless contain information on how the date is set. The list must contain a maximum of 5 previous deliveries, whether the candidate is one entity, composed of a group of entities (e.g. consortium), including temporary joint ventures, or relies on the technical and professional capacity of other entities. If the list contains more than 5, DALO will only consider the first 5 deliveries on the list. Deliveries beyond that will be disregarded. Please note that a candidate may rely on the technical and professional capacity of other entities (e.g. a parent or sister company or a sub-supplier), irrespective of the legal nature of the relations between the candidate and the entity or entities on which the candidate relies. The candidate must demonstrate experience with as a minimum one similar delivery within the past 2 years prior to the deadline for the request to participate. A “similar delivery” shall be understood as services similar to the services described in Section II.1.5).
A list of the most important similar deliveries (references), cf. Section II.1.5) in regards to the lot or lots which the candidate has requested to participate, carried out within the past 2 years prior to the deadline for the request to participate. Only the deliveries (references) performed at the time of the deadline for the request to participate will be considered when assessing if the minimum requirement for suitability stated below is fulfilled and which candidate has documented the most relevant previous deliveries, cf. Section IV.1.2). If the delivery in question is ongoing, it is only the part of the services performed and completed at the time of the deadline for the request to participate which will be included in the assessment of the delivery (reference). The list should preferably include a short description of each delivery. The description of the deliveries should include a clear indication of which specific parts the deliveries are similar to the services described in Section II.1.5, in regards to the lot or lots which the candidate has requested to participate. The description should also include a description of the candidates participation / role in the performance of the deliveries. The description should also contain information on the date of the deliveries, the size and value of the deliveries, the recipients of the deliveries (specific names / countries are preferred, but not necessary; if no country specific information is included, the candidate is asked to provide as much generic information as possible about the delivery). When specifying the date for the deliveries, the candidate should state the date for the commencement and completion of the deliveries. If this is not possible, e.g. because the delivery in question is performed on an ongoing basis according to a framework agreement, the description of the deliveries should nonetheless contain information on how the date is set. The list must contain a maximum of 5 previous deliveries, whether the candidate is one entity, composed of a group of entities (e.g. consortium), including temporary joint ventures, or relies on the technical and professional capacity of other entities. If the list contains more than 5, DALO will only consider the first 5 deliveries on the list. Deliveries beyond that will be disregarded. Please note that a candidate may rely on the technical and professional capacity of other entities (e.g. a parent or sister company or a sub-supplier), irrespective of the legal nature of the relations between the candidate and the entity or entities on which the candidate relies.
The candidate must demonstrate experience with as a minimum one similar delivery within the past 2 years prior to the deadline for the request to participate. A “similar delivery” shall be understood as services similar to the services described in Section II.1.5).