Public procurement notice: Contract Award Notice
Published: 2025-11-21
Buyer: Ålesund brannvesen KF
Country: NO
Region: NO0A3
Contract type: Supplies
Procedure: Open procedure
CPV classification: 35000000: Security, fire-fighting, police and defence equipment | 35110000: Fire-fighting and safety equipment | 35111000: Fire-fighting equipment | 35111500 | 45343000
Estimated value: 24999200 NOK
Award criteria: price, quality

Technical requirements: The aim of the procurement is to cover the need for smoke diving installations that shall be used for training activities in accordance with the requirement specifications.
The smoke diving installation shall be delivered to Ålesund Fire Brigade KF.
Weighting:

The award criteria is weighted 25%. 

Orientation:

Tenderers shall fill in the attached price form in their cost calculations and submit it as an annex to the tender in Excel format. All fields in the attached price form marked with yellow shall be completed. Missing the price fields can cause difficulties in assessing the tender and the tender can then be rejected.

All prices are in NOK, excluding VAT, including all direct or indirect expenses and duties that could be incurred in connection with the delivery. Order fees and invoice fees are to be seen as expenses. The prices shall include all costs for the customer who is included in this competition. Costs that the tenderer knows will be incurred, but that are not specifically stated in the tender, will be seen as included in the stated costs.

Evaluation:

When assessing the price, a hybrid model with break point 1 will be used. The attached template for the evaluation model is attached. 

The tenderer ́s total points for this award criteria is weighted with the award criteria ́s weighting percentage.
Weighting: 

The award criteria is weighted 40%.

Orientation:

Tenderers are asked to describe their proposed solution in a uniform and understandable way. The solution description shall give the contracting authority a good basis for assessing how the system will cover the need.

Particular emphasis will be put on the following points:

Function description: 

Description of how the system fulfils the requirements stated in the requirement specification.
An account of the technical structure, capacity, flexibility and any special qualities.
Usability: 

A description of how the system is designed to be simple, intuitive and secure in use.
Adaptation options for different user groups (novice, instructors, experienced etc.)
Instruction and training materials included in the
HSE:

Description of how the system safeguards the security of the users.
Risk reducing measures and systems that prevent injury or unwanted events
Logging:

A description of how the system enables registration and documentation of exercises, activities and use.
Other:

Other qualities or merfilling minimum requirements that provide an improved solution.
The response shall be maximum 20 A4 pages. The response shall not include a cover page or table of contents. Any pages after page 20 will not be evaluated. Any links etc. in the reply will not be evaluated. 

Evaluation:

This award criteria will be assessed based on the tenderer ́s description of the award criteria. A total procurement assessment of the described system will be carried out during the evaluation.

Best solution will be awarded the highest score (10). Other solutions will be awarded a point score relative to the best solution. 

The tenderer ́s total points for this award criteria is weighted with the award criteria ́s weighting percentage.
Weighting: 

The award criteria is weighted 30%.

The award criteria consists of two (2) sub-criteria:

The Guarantee sub-criterion is weighted 60% of this award criteria. 
The sub-criterion Surface treatment of containers is weighted 40% of this award criteria. 
Orientation:

In order to give a lower climate footprint, the customer will have a system that has a good operating time and standard and asks tenderers to fill in information on the following:

Warranty:

- Tenderers shall state what is included and the length of the guarantee given for the product.

Surface treatment of containers:

- Tenderers are asked to describe what type of surface treatment the containers have undergone in order to ensure quality/lifetime and to minimise the environmental impact.

Tenderers are requested to fill in the attached Excel form 'Award Criteria Environment'.

Evaluation:

This award criteria will be assessed based on the tenderer ́s description of the award criteria. A total procurement assessment of the described system will be carried out during the evaluation.

Best solution will be awarded the highest score (10). Other solutions will be awarded a point score relative to the best solution.

The tenderer ́s total points for this award criteria is weighted with the award criteria ́s weighting percentage.


Winner: LION Protects B.V.
Award value: 181145323
Number of bids: 5