Public procurement notice: Contract Notice
Published: 2017-12-23
Buyer: Kyles Community Broadband CIC c/o Gardiner & Theobald LLP
Country: UK
Contract type: Services
Procedure: Competitive procedure with negotiation
CPV classification: 32400000 | 32412100 | 32521000 | 32522000 | 64200000
Estimated value: 2500000 GBP
Submission deadline: 2018-01-29
Award criteria: The most economic tender

Technical requirements: Provision of Next Generation Broadband infrastructure and services to The Kyles of Bute covering an area encompassing Colintraive & Glendaruel and rural Bute.
Kyles Community Broadband, a Community Interest Company (CIC) established under the Companies Act 2006, working in partnership with Community Broadband Scotland (CBS), a Scottish Government initiative led by Highlands and Islands Enterprise (HIE) wishes to identify a supplier who can provide a Next Generation (NGA) State Aid compliant (SA. 40720 (2016/N)) infrastructure that will enable access to NGA services at greater than 30 Mbps to all premises in the project area (subject to any technical and funding constraints). The successful bidder will contract with Kyles Community Broadband CIC.
This contract will not be divided into lots as this would make the execution of the contract excessively technically difficult.
— statements including the specific requirements can be found within Section III.1.1, III.1.2 and III.1.3 of the Contract Notice.
Section B of Part IV of the ESPD will be scored on a pass/fail basis. Section C of Part IV of the ESPD will be scored in the following way:
0 — Unacceptable: Nil or inadequate response. Fails to demonstrate previous experience/capacity/capability relevant to this criterion. No Documented Quality, Safety & Environmental processes.
1 — Poor: Response is partially relevant but generally poor. The response shows some elements of relevance to the criterion but contains insufficient/limited detail or explanation to demonstrate previous relevant experience/capacity/capability.
2 — Acceptable: Response is relevant and acceptable. The response demonstrates broad previous experience, knowledge and skills/capacity/adaptability but may lack in some aspects of similarity e.g. previous experience, knowledge or skills may not be of a similar nature. Documented Quality, Safety & Environmental processes and/or working towards Quality, Safety & Environmental certification.
3 — Good: Response is relevant and good. The response is sufficiently detailed to demonstrate a good amount of experience, knowledge or skills/capacity/capability relevant to providing similar services to similar clients.
4 — Excellent: Response is completely relevant and excellent overall. The response is comprehensive, unambiguous and demonstrates thorough experience, knowledge or skills/capacity/capability relevant to providing similar services to similar clients. Quality, Safety & Environmental certification held.
The questions to be addressed at Section B of Part IV and Section C of Part IV of the ESPD are set out at Section III.1.2 and III 1.3 of this Contract Notice and will be weighted the following way:
Technical and Professional Ability Question 4C.1.2: 60 %, Question 4C.8.1: 20 % and Question 4C.8.2: 20 %.
For Section C of Part IV of the ESPD the score obtained for each answer will be divided by the maximum possible score (of 4) and multiplied by the relevant weighting to derive the weighted score. The aggregate of all weighted scores delivers a total weighted score out of 100. The five highest scoring bidders will be invited to submit an initial tender (subject always to their meeting the minimum requirements set out elsewhere in this Contract Notice).
The 2016 National Broadband Scheme requires Bidders agree to the terms of The BDUK “Use of Existing Infrastructure Code of Conduct” which can be found at:
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/524806/Use_of_Existing_Infrastructure_Code_of_Conduct.pdf

Eligibility requirements: Not Applicable.

Award value: 2500000