Public procurement notice: Contract Notice
Published: 2018-04-04
Buyer: Danish Defence Acquisition and Logistics Organizations
Country: DK
Contract type: Supplies
Procedure: Restricted procedure
CPV classification: 31644000 | 35000000: Security, fire-fighting, police and defence equipment | 35710000: Command and control systems | 80660000
Estimated value:  DKK
Submission deadline: 2018-05-03
Award criteria: The most economic tender

Technical requirements: The Danish Defence Acquisition and Logistics Organization (DALO) is planning to enter into a framework agreement regarding a target impact localization system, including spare parts, services, education and software upgrades, which with few resources can improve bearing of artillery and mortars, not only in precision but also in consistence. Besides that the manpower needed and the time for preparing the Target Practicing system will be reduced substantially when firing with artillery and Mortars.
—— With an accuracy to determine Point of Impact (Pol) with a circular effort probability of maximum 10 m.
—— If the accuracy/precision of the system is affected by meteorology, the system shall be able to correct the determined PoI for the influence of meteorology at the time of impact. (minimum temperature, wind speed, direction and density).
—— The system shall be capable of transmitting necessary data in "real time" from the sensors to the receiver up to at least 10 km from the sensors.
—— The sensors shall be capable of operating without change of battery for two days (48 hours (hrs)).
—— Necessary wireless communication shall be in the free/open spectrum in accordance with EU legislation.
—— The complete system shall be transportable in the back of a 4x4 vehicle of the type Nissan Navarra, or similar size car.
DALO will commit itself to purchase one Target Impact Localization System upon signing the Framework Agreement.
Reference is made to the tender documents regarding payment terms. Invoicing must be done in accordance with the applicable Danish legislation on public payments. At present, this is Danish consolidation act. nº 798 of June 2007 which requires invoicing to be done electronically. Exact terms will be stated in the contract.
No particular legal form is required. If the contract is awarded to a group of suppliers (e.g. a consortium), the participants are required to undertake joint and several liabilities and to appoint one supplier to represent the group.
The framework agreement must be conducted in consideration of corporate social responsibility and it contains a labour clause.
When submitting the offers (but not the request for participation), the tenderers must submit a solemn declaration stating to which degree the tenderer has unpaid overdue debt in relation to tax, duties or social security contributions under Danish law or under the law of the country in which the tenderer is established. A template for the declaration will be provided with the tender documents, and the tenderer is encouraged — but not obliged — to use it.
Be advised, that DALO shall exclude a tenderer which has unpaid overdue debt of 100 000 DKK  or more to public authorities in relation to tax, duties or social security contributions under Danish law or under the law of the country in which the tenderer is established.
However, DALO may not exclude a tenderer which has provided sufficient documentation that the tenderer is reliable. DALO will decide whether the documentation is sufficient, hence the tenderer is considered reliable, based on the guidelines equal to the guidelines provided for in Section 138(1-4) of the Danish Act no. 1564 of 15.12.2015 — The Public Procurement Act.
Document in the Prequalification Questionnaire (PQQ) the candidate's equity ratio (calculated by dividing the candidate’s equity with the candidate’s total assets (equity/total assets x 100) at the end of the last 3 financial years, to the extent such information is available.

Eligibility requirements: Document in the Prequalification Questionnaire (PQQ) the candidate's equity ratio (calculated by dividing the candidate’s equity with the candidate’s total assets (equity/total assets x 100) at the end of the last 3 financial years, to the extent such information is available.
The candidate must have had a positive equity ratio for each the last 3 financial years. The equity ratio is calculated by dividing the candidate's equity with the candidate's total assets (equity/total assets x 100). If the candidate is composed of a group of entities (e.g. consortium), including temporary joint ventures, the equity ratio is calculated by dividing the sum of all the participants’ equities with the sum of all the participants’ total assets (sum of equity/sum of total assets x 100) in each of the last 3 financial years available. If the candidate relies on the economic and financial standing of an entity or entities, the equity ratio is calculated by dividing the sum of the candidate’s and the entity or entities’ equity with the sum of the candidate’s and the entity or entities’ total assets (sum of equity/sum of total assets x 100) in each of the last 3 financial years available. Please note that a candidate may rely on the economic and financial standing of other entities (e.g. a parent or sister company or a subsupplier), irrespective of the legal nature of the relations between the candidate and the entity or entities on which the candidate relies.
A list of the most important similar deliveries (references), cf. section II.1.5), carried out within the past 5 (five) years prior to the deadline for the request to participate. Only the deliveries (references) performed at the time of the deadline for the request to participate will be considered when assessing if the minimum requirement for suitability stated below is fulfilled/ which candidate has documented the most relevant previous deliveries, cf. section IV.1.2). If the delivery in question is ongoing, it is only the part of the services / supplies performed and completed at the time of the deadline for the request to participate which will be included in the assessment of the delivery (reference). The list should preferably include a short description of each delivery. The description of the deliveries should include a clear indication of which specific parts the deliveries are similar to the supplies, described in Section II.1.5. The description should also including a description of the candidates participation/role in the performance of the deliveries. The description should also contain information on the date of the deliveries, the size of the deliveries, the recipients of the deliveries (specific names/countries are preferred, but not necessary; if no country specific information is included, the candidate is asked to provide as much generic information as possible about the delivery). When specifying the date for the deliveries, the candidate should state the date for the commencement and completion of the deliveries. If this is not possible, e.g. because the delivery in question is performed on an ongoing basis according to a framework agreement, the description of the deliveries should nonetheless contain information on how the date is set. Please note that a candidate may rely on the technical and professional capacity of other entities (e.g. a parent or sister company or a sub supplier), irrespective of the legal nature of the relations between the candidate and the entity or entities on which the candidate relies. The candidate must demonstrate experience with as a minimum one similar delivery within the past 5 years prior to the deadline for the request to participate.
A list of the most important similar deliveries (references), cf. section II.1.5), carried out within the past 5 (five) years prior to the deadline for the request to participate. Only the deliveries (references) performed at the time of the deadline for the request to participate will be considered when assessing if the minimum requirement for suitability stated below is fulfilled/ which candidate has documented the most relevant previous deliveries, cf. section IV.1.2). If the delivery in question is ongoing, it is only the part of the services / supplies performed and completed at the time of the deadline for the request to participate which will be included in the assessment of the delivery (reference). The list should preferably include a short description of each delivery. The description of the deliveries should include a clear indication of which specific parts the deliveries are similar to the supplies, described in Section II.1.5. The description should also including a description of the candidates participation/role in the performance of the deliveries. The description should also contain information on the date of the deliveries, the size of the deliveries, the recipients of the deliveries (specific names/countries are preferred, but not necessary; if no country specific information is included, the candidate is asked to provide as much generic information as possible about the delivery). When specifying the date for the deliveries, the candidate should state the date for the commencement and completion of the deliveries. If this is not possible, e.g. because the delivery in question is performed on an ongoing basis according to a framework agreement, the description of the deliveries should nonetheless contain information on how the date is set. Please note that a candidate may rely on the technical and professional capacity of other entities (e.g. a parent or sister company or a sub supplier), irrespective of the legal nature of the relations between the candidate and the entity or entities on which the candidate relies.
The candidate must demonstrate experience with as a minimum one similar delivery within the past 5 years prior to the deadline for the request to participate.