Public procurement notice: Contract Award Notice
Published: 2023-01-31
Buyer: Danish Ministry of Defence Acquisition and Logistics Organisation
Country: DK
Contract type: Supplies
Procedure: Open procedure
CPV classification: 35000000: Security, fire-fighting, police and defence equipment | 35111000: Fire-fighting equipment | 35111200
Estimated value: 39000000 DKK
Award criteria: The most economic tender

Technical requirements: The Agreement concerns the supply and sustainment of petrol powered portable fire pumps and associated accessories. The Buyer intends to use the Deliverables for operational firefighting and for training and exercises for firefighters.
The Danish Defence Acquisition and Logistics Organization and the Danish Emergency Management Agency (hereafter DALO) as well as the municipal fire departments offer a framework agreement regarding the procurement of portable fire pumps and associated services and the supply of accessories. DALO as well as the municipal fire departments want portable fire pumps for use in operational readiness and in connection with the training and exercise activities of rescue specialists and volunteers. The portable fire pump must at least comply with the latest versions of EN 1028 and EN 14466 or equivalent. The fire pumps are used as a water supply for fire extinguishing in buildings and industrial plants as well as fires in nature and forests. Furthermore, portable fire pumps are used to provide water supply for extinguishing fire over longer distances.
The Agreement is entered into by DALO. However, all divisions of the Danish Ministry of Defence, including all units of the Danish Defence subject to the command of the Chief of Defence is entitled to use the Agreement. In addition, a range of municipal fire and rescue services are entitled to use the Agreement, cf. Appendix I, in which these entities are listed.
Regarding section II.1.5): The estimated value of the framework agreement is kr. 13 mio. and the maximum value of the framework agreement is kr. 39 mio. The reason for the difference between the stated values is the uncertainty regarding the final value of the framework agreement, cf. below. Hence, the estimated value constitutes DALO’s most qualified estimate of the value of the framework agreement at the present moment, while the maximum value constitutes the maximum value of purchases under the framework agreement in its duration.
The uncertainty regarding the final value of the framework agreement is primarily caused by uncertainty regarding the Danish Defence’ operational needs through the duration of the framework agreement, including un-certainty about specific deployments and mission areas in particular, which is not possible to foresee for the entire span of the framework agreement. Thus, changes to the operational needs of the Danish Defence compared to the existing situation and needs may cause a significant larger expenditure on the framework agreement than what is expected at the moment.
The framework agreement contains requirements regarding labour clause, CSR requirements, international sanctions as well as provisions regarding risk assessment and follow-up actions. Upon submission of an offer the tenderer is asked to submit a self-declaration on compliance with labour clauses, CSR obligations and international sanctions, cf. “Additional information”. DALO has uploaded a template (available in the ETHICS web portal) which must be used as a statement. See the "Additional information" document, which is available on the ETHICS web portal, for more information.
The tenderer must together with the tender submit an ESPD as preliminary evidence of the circumstances set out in § 148(1) (1-3) of the Public Procurement Act. Thetenderer and, if relevant, the participants in the group of entities or/and entities on which the tenderer relies on, must use the electronic version of the ESPD available at ETHICS’ web portal. The ESPD shall be fulfilled and submitted at ETHICS’ web portal in accordance with the instructions given by ETHICS. The ESPD document must be signed by the supporting entity. It is not necessary for the tenderer to sign the ESPD document. If the tenderer is a group of entities (consurtiums), each participant’s ESPD document must be signed by the participant in question. It is not necessary for the participant submitting the tender to sign his ESPD document.
Prior to decision on award of the contract, DALO shall require that the tenderer to whom DALO intends to award the contract presents documentation for the information stated in the ESPD, cf. §§ 151-155 of the said Act. Please see the document “Additional information”, which is located at the ETHICS-webportal, cf. section I.3), for further information on the matter.
The framework agreement is not divided into lots on the grounds described in the document “Additional information”, which is located at the ETHICS-webportal, cf. section I.3).
For further information regarding this procurement, please see the document “Additional information”, which is located at the ETHICS-webportal, cf. section I.3).
Pursuant to the Danish Consolidation Act no. 593 of 2 June 2016 on the Complaints Board for Public Procurement (available at www.retsinformation.dk), the following time limits for filing a complaint apply:
Complaints regarding public procurements and decisions subject to Chapter II or III of the Public Procurement Act, which does not concern a candidate not being invited to tender, must in accordance with § 7(2) of the Act on The Complaints Board for Public Procurement be filed with The Complaints Board for Public Procurement with-in:
1)	45 calendar days after the contracting authority has published a contract award notice in the Official Jour-nal of the European Union. The time limit is calculated from the day after the publication date.
2) 	30 calendar days starting the day after the contracting authority has notified the tenderers in question, that the contracting authority has entered into a contract based on a framework agreement through reopening of competition or a dynamic purchasing system, provided that the notification includes an account of the rea-sons for the decision.
3) 	6 months after the contracting authority has entered into the framework agreement starting the day after the contracting authority has sent notification to the tenderers involved, cf. § 2(2) or § 171(4) of the Public Procurement Act, provided that the notification included an account of the reasons for the decision.


Winner: Rosenbauer International AG
Award value: 39000000
Number of bids: 1