Public procurement notice: Contract Notice
Published: 2016-05-25
Buyer: Ministerie van Economische Zaken, Rijksdienst voor Ondernemend Nederland (RVO)
Country: NL
Region: NEDERLAND
Contract type: Services
Procedure: Open procedure
CPV classification: 73000000
Submission deadline: 2016-06-30
Award criteria: Criteria: Quality of the proposal Description: This preference concerns the quality of the proposal. Here the following points will be assessed: — Clarity of the description of the methodology, modelling approach and proposed analyses (max. 5 points) — Motivation of suitable data sources to be applied for the study including performed validations (max. 5 points) Requirements: Proposal., Criteria: Quality of the deliverables Description: This preference concerns the quality and completeness of the deliverables. Here, the following points will be assessed: — The extent to which the requested output parameters are covered (max. 15 points) — Clarity of the description and illustrations of the proposed metocean database and GUI (Graphical User Interface) and its proposed functionality and user friendliness) (max. 15 points) Requirements: Must be part of the proposal als mentioned under ‘. Quality of the proposal’., Criteria: track record and experience of project team Description: This criterion concerns the track record, experience and expertise of the proposed project team with performing metocean analyses. Contracting Authority requests following information of Tenderer as a base for the assessment: — CV's of the dedicated project manager, project supervisor and project team members. — Reference project lists of the proposed team members (it is mandatory to fill in the provided excel file) in the last 10 years. It should also be indicated per project if a database was provided. The experience of the proposed project team should apply to the staff members you actually intend to use for the services requested. — List of reference journal and/or conference publications of metocean research in the past 10 years of team members (it is mandatory to fill in the provided excel file). Requirements: — Completed Annex ‘Preference 3 Project team TN 95842’ and — CV's of the dedicated project manager, project supervisor and project team members., Criteria: delivery date of the draft report and database Description: Assessment of this criterion will be based on: — the extent to which the time schedule is comprehensive, complete and SMART — the proposed delivery date of reports and database (Contracting Authority would like to receive the deliverables as soon as possible) — the feasibility of the proposed delivery date Requirements: Must be part of the proposal as mentioned under 1. ‘quality of the proposal’, Criteria: Price/rates Description: The tenderer is requested to specify a total lump sum price for the study (base Scope of Work), including optional prices 1) to update the study in case of a layout change and 2) to validate and update the results based on the results of the metocean measurement campaign. All prices should be stated excluding VAT. Requirements: Completed Annex 4 (Prices/Rates). Supplementary to Annex 4 a price calculation must be included, containing at least estimation of the number of hours including corresponding hourly rates, per phase and activity.

Technical requirements: Criteria: Quality of the proposal Description: This preference concerns the quality of the proposal. Here the following points will be assessed: — Clarity of the description of the methodology, modelling approach and proposed analyses (max. 5 points) — Motivation of suitable data sources to be applied for the study including performed validations (max. 5 points) Requirements: Proposal.
Criteria: Quality of the deliverables Description: This preference concerns the quality and completeness of the deliverables. Here, the following points will be assessed: — The extent to which the requested output parameters are covered (max. 15 points) — Clarity of the description and illustrations of the proposed metocean database and GUI (Graphical User Interface) and its proposed functionality and user friendliness) (max. 15 points) Requirements: Must be part of the proposal als mentioned under ‘. Quality of the proposal’.
Criteria: track record and experience of project team Description: This criterion concerns the track record, experience and expertise of the proposed project team with performing metocean analyses. Contracting Authority requests following information of Tenderer as a base for the assessment: — CV's of the dedicated project manager, project supervisor and project team members. — Reference project lists of the proposed team members (it is mandatory to fill in the provided excel file) in the last 10 years. It should also be indicated per project if a database was provided. The experience of the proposed project team should apply to the staff members you actually intend to use for the services requested. — List of reference journal and/or conference publications of metocean research in the past 10 years of team members (it is mandatory to fill in the provided excel file). Requirements: — Completed Annex ‘Preference 3 Project team TN 95842’ and — CV's of the dedicated project manager, project supervisor and project team members.
Criteria: delivery date of the draft report and database Description: Assessment of this criterion will be based on: — the extent to which the time schedule is comprehensive, complete and SMART — the proposed delivery date of reports and database (Contracting Authority would like to receive the deliverables as soon as possible) — the feasibility of the proposed delivery date Requirements: Must be part of the proposal as mentioned under 1. ‘quality of the proposal’
Criteria: Price/rates Description: The tenderer is requested to specify a total lump sum price for the study (base Scope of Work), including optional prices 1) to update the study in case of a layout change and 2) to validate and update the results based on the results of the metocean measurement campaign. All prices should be stated excluding VAT. Requirements: Completed Annex 4 (Prices/Rates). Supplementary to Annex 4 a price calculation must be included, containing at least estimation of the number of hours including corresponding hourly rates, per phase and activity.
The purpose of the assignment will be to provide the meteorological and oceanographic (metocean) conditions to serve as input for the design, installation and maintenance of wind turbines, inter array cables, substations and their support structures at Wind Farm Zones Hollandse Kust (noord) and Hollandse Kust (zuid). The analysis is to be based on the best possible data sources, be carried out with state-of-the-art methods and be in accordance with offshore standard DNV-OS-J101 (or equal or better or an updated version if available).
1. Provide a general characterization of the metocean climate at the site (e.g. dominant tides, storm severity, spatial uniformity of conditions).
3. Summarize the approach and results (tables, graphs) of one representative output location in a separate report for each wind farm zone (one for Hollandse Kust zuid and one for Hollandse Kust noord). This output location will be proposed by the contractor and approved by RVO.
4. Provide a digital metocean database that will enable obtaining output (tables, graphs) at any requested location within the site boundaries of Hollandse Kust (noord) and (zuid).
5. Validate and update the reports and database when the final metocean field measurements at Hollandse Kust (zuid) become available in mid-2017.
Notes to Document: A signed appendix ‘Self-declaration’. Other evidence should only be provided once requested by the contracting authority.
Please note: the Self-declaration statement allows for a digital signature. However, the contracting authority requires a ‘wet’ signature.
Attention: digital submission is not considered equivalent to a validly signed offer (document). you are asked to submit a validly signed document: signed, scanned and digitally submitted with the offer by the designated legally authorised official.
—all requirements set out in chapter 5 of the tender document and the tenderer declares that it will fulfil these requirements during the term of the agreement.
Attention: digital submission is not considered equivalent to a validly signed offer (document). you are asked to submit a validly signed document: signed, scanned and digitally submitted with the offer by the designated legally authorised official.

Eligibility requirements: Requirement: Reference data. Legal reference: Prinicipal deliveries in the past 3 years. Document: References. Notes to Document: For each key competency, present a reference that fulfils the requirements as set out in par. 4.2.2. If more than one key competency fulfilling the set requirements is reflected in a single reference, then you can use the same reference for those key competencies. The reference(s) must be signed by the referee (the Contracting Authority) as well as by the duly authorised person who can represent the Tenderer. Description: see paragraph 4.2.2. of the Tender document. Legal reference: Principal deliveries in the past 3 years. Document: References.
Requirement: Reference data. Legal reference: Prinicipal deliveries in the past 3 years. Document: References. Notes to Document: For each key competency, present a reference that fulfils the requirements as set out in par. 4.2.2. If more than one key competency fulfilling the set requirements is reflected in a single reference, then you can use the same reference for those key competencies. The reference(s) must be signed by the referee (the Contracting Authority) as well as by the duly authorised person who can represent the Tenderer.
Description: see paragraph 4.2.2. of the Tender document. Legal reference: Principal deliveries in the past 3 years. Document: References.