Public procurement notice: Contract Notice
Published: 2018-04-25
Buyer: Edinburgh Napier University
Country: UK
Contract type: Services
Procedure: Open procedure
CPV classification: 31625100 | 31625200 | 32234000 | 35000000: Security, fire-fighting, police and defence equipment | 35120000: Surveillance and security systems
Estimated value: 600000 GBP
Submission deadline: 2018-05-24
Award criteria: The most economic tender

Technical requirements: Maintenance (reactive maintenance and planned preventative maintenance) of security equipment (including fire alarm /detection) & systems at the authority’s sites and in addition, a supply and installation service covering a range of security systems equipment (including fire alarm /detection) (as and when required) at the authority’s sites.
Lot 1 Single combined Security System (3 elements: Intruder Alarms, Access Control& CCTV: Maintenance (& Installation)
— access control (including card reader access, fob access (including push button access) at student accommodation residencies, voice intercom and (traffic management) car park barrier equipment) and Traka security systems),
— Lot 2: Fire Alarms /Fire Detection & Disabled Refuge Alarms (including Disabled Refuge Systems /Disabled Toilet Alarms): Maintenance (& Installation).
Maintenance (& installation) of fire alarms /fire detection & disabled refuge alarms (including disabled refuge systems /disabled toilet alarms).
Please provide relevant examples of 2 similar types of services for each of the lots (Lot 1 and Lot 2) that a bid is being submitted for carried out in the past 3 years.
Pass: Response provided is relevant and detailed. The response is sufficiently detailed to demonstrate a good understanding and provides good details on the example of 2 contracts of a similar nature that the tenderer has previously carried out and provides confidence that the requirements will be fulfilled.
Fail: Nil or an inadequate response. The response fails to demonstrate an ability to meet the requirement.
Tenderers wishing to be considered for this project must have in place membership of a safety scheme in procurement such as CHAS or safe contractor or certification in accordance with ISO 18001 or an equivalent accreditation. Tenderers should confirm in their response that they have membership of safety scheme or certification in accordance with ISO 18001 or an equivalent accreditation and provide details of certification of safety scheme, or other certification in accordance with ISO18001. If there is an equivalent accreditation being proposed by the tenderer then details and evidence should be provided showing that it is a detailed and robust equivalent accreditation.
Pass = The tenderer has confirmed that a safety scheme or certification in accordance ISO18001 is in place and provided evidence. Where an equivalent accreditation is being proposed by the tenderer, they have provided evidence to show that it the accreditation is both detailed and robust.
Fail = The tenderer does not confirm that a safety scheme or certification in accordance ISO18001 or an equivalent accreditation is in place or no evidence has been provided by the tenderer or the evidence provided by the tenderer does not provided sufficient evidence to show that the safety /scheme /accreditation is robust and detailed enough to meet with the University’s Safety requirements.
Q4B.2: Tenderers will be required to have a minimum “specific” yearly turnover of 250 000 GBP for each of the last 2 years in the business area covered by the contract.
The tenderer(s), if requested, will be required to provide 2 years audited accounts, or equivalent prior to the award of contract.
PCS-T Qualification envelope: question 1.76.14 4B.5.1: employer's (compulsory) liability insurance: 5 000 000 GBP.
PCS-T Qualification envelope: question: 1.76.15 4B.5.2: insurance – public and product indemnity insurance cover of: 5 000 000 GBP.

Eligibility requirements: Services: example of services: question number 4C.1: In qualification envelope: Note A reminder that this is a Mandatory Question: Please provide relevant examples of 2 similar types of services for each of the lots (Lot 1 and Lot 2) that a bid is being submitted for carried out in the past 3 years. Details should include (but not be limited to): — the value for each of the 2 contracts carried out, — the scope of the requirements for these 2 contracts, — the organisations that the two contracts were carried out on behalf of, — reference contacts at the two organisations, — the term of contract (for each of the 2 contracts). Note this question (4C.1) will be evaluated as follows: Pass: Response provided is relevant and detailed. The response is sufficiently detailed to demonstrate a good understanding and provides good details on the example of 2 contracts of a similar nature that the tenderer has previously carried out and provides confidence that the requirements will be fulfilled. Fail: Nil or an inadequate response. The response fails to demonstrate an ability to meet the requirement. Safety accreditation: mandatory: question number 1.80 Part 4C.2: technicians & technical bodies. Tenderers wishing to be considered for this project must have in place membership of a safety scheme in procurement such as CHAS or safe contractor or certification in accordance with ISO 18001 or an equivalent accreditation. Tenderers should confirm in their response that they have membership of safety scheme or certification in accordance with ISO 18001 or an equivalent accreditation and provide details of certification of safety scheme, or other certification in accordance with ISO18001. If there is an equivalent accreditation being proposed by the tenderer then details and evidence should be provided showing that it is a detailed and robust equivalent accreditation. Scoring methodology for this question is as follows: Pass = The tenderer has confirmed that a safety scheme or certification in accordance ISO18001 is in place and provided evidence. Where an equivalent accreditation is being proposed by the tenderer, they have provided evidence to show that it the accreditation is both detailed and robust. Fail = The tenderer does not confirm that a safety scheme or certification in accordance ISO18001 or an equivalent accreditation is in place or no evidence has been provided by the tenderer or the evidence provided by the tenderer does not provided sufficient evidence to show that the safety /scheme /accreditation is robust and detailed enough to meet with the University’s Safety requirements. Additional procurement qualification questions: As detailed in ITT Tender document. Form of tender: Appendix A. Confirmation on meeting statement of requirements. Equality Act (2010). Unlawful discrimination: employment tribunal. Equality and human rights commission: complaints upheld. Waste (Scotland) Regulations (2012).

Award value: 600000