Public procurement notice: Contract Notice
Published: 2025-12-05
Buyer: Statens vegvesen
Country: NO
Region: NO081
Contract type: Services
Procedure: Negotiated with prior call for competition
CPV classification: 48000000 | 48200000 | 48210000 | 48220000 | 48500000
Estimated value: 25000000 NOK
Submission deadline: 2026-01-08
Award criteria: quality, price

Technical requirements: Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a enforceable verdict has been convicted of corruption by a verdict handed down not more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Corruption as defined in Article 3 of the Convention on Combating Corruption, Involving European Communities or European Union Member States (EUT C 195 of 25.6.1997, s. 1), and in Article 2, point 1, in the Council ́s framework decision 2003/568/RIA of 22 July 2003 on combating corruption in the private sector (EUT L 192 of 31.7.2003,  p. 54). This rejection reason also includes corruption as defined in national law for the contracting authority or supplier.
Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, at the time a legally convicted of fraud has been convicted of fraud by a verdict handed down not more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Fraud included in Article 1 of the Convention on protection of the Financial Interests of the European Communities (EFT C 316 of 27.11.1995, p. 48).
Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of money laundering or financing terrorism by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set out directly in the judgement that still applies? Money laundering or financing terrorism As defined in Article 1 of the European Parliament and Council Directive 2005/60/EF of 26 October 2005 on preventive measures against the use of the financial system for money laundering and financing terrorism (EUT L 309 of 25.11.2005, p. 15).
Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, at the time a legally convicted verdict of participation in a criminal organisation by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set out directly in the judgement that still applies? Participation in a criminal organisation as defined in Article 2 of the Council ́s framework decision 2008/841/RIA of 24 October 2008 on control of organised crime (EUT L 300 of 11.11.2008, p. 42)
Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body, or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of acts of terrorism or criminal acts connected to terrorist activities by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set out directly in the judgement that still applies? Acts of terrorism or criminal acts relating to terrorist activity as defined in Article 1 and 3 of the Council ́s framework decision 2002/475/RIA of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (EFT L 164, af 22.6.2002, p. 3). This rejection reason also includes incitement to, participation or attempts to commit such actions as included in Article 4 in the mentioned framework decision.

Eligibility requirements: The supplier must have equivalent experience.
For the experience to be considered equivalent,
it must include the following:
By equivalent experience, we mean experience with the use of CDN:
• Projects where the supplier has managed the reception and distribution of video content, including technical processing and delivery to end users.
Solutions limited to CDN for websites will not be considered equivalent experience.
• Relevant deliveries include solutions where the supplier has handled, processed, and distributed video content at scale, providing both real-time and on-demand access, made available through APIs and web interfaces.
The supplier's response to the requirements in Appendix 1 and Appendix 1 Attachment 1 - Customer specification of requirements, will be evaluated based on what solution is best suited for the NPRA.

The requirements are weighted in two categories. Normal and important, where the important is twice the weight of the normal requirement. The requirements in Excel spreadsheet are marked either N/A (mandatory requirement), normal or important.

The evaluation criteria must be documented by responding to the requirements. Answers should primarily be provided in the attached Excel sheet, Appendix 1 Attachment 1 - Customer specification of requirements. If there is insufficient space in the spreadsheet, the supplier may refer to a structured attachment with a clear reference to the requirement ID. Each answer must clearly indicate which specific requirement it addresses.

The processing time in the price from for the API calls will also be evaluated in this award criteria.
As stated in requirement F-027 we would prefer to use the standard SLA agreement that the supplier proposes.
The different SLA levels of the suppliers will be evaluated.
The supplier should propose their standard SLA, which will be evaluated primarily on the following:
• The proposed service levels
• The methods/ tools used to measure delivered service levels, in comparison with the proposed levels
• The standardised compensation mechanism if the required service levels are not attained

The SLA shall clearly describe financial compensation in accordance with the suppliers' standardised rates.
The following regulations in the standard terms will be particularly emphasised in the Customer's risk assessment:
•Changes to the cloud service and/or the terms
•Duration and termination
•Remuneration
•Audit
•Data processing agreement and compliance with the data protection legislation.
•Confidentiality
•Right of disposal
•Ownership of data
•Legal defects
•Remedies for breach of contract
•Regulations on compensation and liability
Suspension of obligations and force majeure
Choice of law and jurisdiction
•Assignment of rights and obligations

It is emphasised that the evaluation will be based on an overall assessment of the standard terms, and provisions other than those listed above may also be considered.
The standard terms are incorporated into SSA-L Annex 9. The supplier will be evaluated based on an overall assessment of the customer's risk related to these standard terms, including any deviations from the provisions of SSA-L.
For
All prices must be specified
See "Appendix 6 - Attachment 1 - Pricing form"
Prices and price provisions included in other appendices to the offer are not valid
If the tenderer shall submit a request for a provisional injunction against the Customer ́s decision to reject a request to participate in the competition or not select a tenderer, this must be made at the latest 15 days after the Customer has sent out notification of the rejection or selection of the tenderer.
The purpose of this procurement is to establish a modern, scalable video streaming solution for traffic cameras, replacing the current outdated system which no longer supports further development. The new solution will enhance the Norwegian Public Roads Administration's capabilities in traffic monitoring and emergency preparedness, while also improving access to real-time video data for both internal and external stakeholders.

The scope includes the delivery of a system that supports approximately 840 road cameras currently in use for traffic information, surveillance, and emergency response. Of these, 125 cameras are video-enabled to provide real-time footage to the public and traffic operators. The solution must cater to the needs of internal traffic operators as well as external users who rely on timely and accurate traffic video data.
The contract can be extended for up to four times, one year at a time, so that the total contract length can be five years.