Public procurement notice: Contract Award Notice
Published: 2019-11-05
Buyer: Danmarks Nationalbank
Country: DK
Contract type: Supplies
Procedure: Open procedure
CPV classification: 48000000 | 72222300: Information technology services | 72263000: Software implementation services | 72265000: Software configuration services
Estimated value: 425000 EUR
Award criteria: The most economic tender

Technical requirements: Danmarks Nationalbank is the central bank of Denmark and is a self-governing, independent institution. The independence of Danmarks Nationalbank is incorporated into the Danmarks Nationalbank Act from 1936, in that the bank's Board of Governors is solely responsible for determining monetary-policy interest rates.
Danmarks Nationalbank's 3 main objectives are to contribute to ensuring stable prices, safe payments and a stable financial system.
Danmarks Nationalbank has initiated a project with the purpose of utilizing new technology in order to perform advanced data analysis on the large data sets available both within the banks databases as well as publicly accessible data.
Danmarks Nationalbank wants to purchase a software solution that can support the needs of the advanced data analytics scientists in the bank for conducting large-scale and complex data analysis.
In order to ensure the effective high quality of the project, Danmarks Nationalbank wishes with this tender to enter into a contract on the delivery of software licenses to a data science tool to be provided for immediate implementation and use with signing of the contract.
The contract includes possibility of the purchase of supplementary licenses, nodes, training and additional technical support.
Pursuant to the Danish Act on the Complaints Board for Public Procurement, etc. (lov om Klagenævnet for Ud-bud m.v.) (the Act is available (in Danish) at www.retsinformation.dk), the following deadlines apply to the lodging of complaints:
Complaints for not having been selected must be submitted to the Danish Complaints Board for Public Procurement before the expiry of 20 calendar days, see section 7(1) of the Act, from the day after submission of notification to the candidates concerned of the identity of the successful tenderer where the notification is accompanied by an explanation of the grounds for the decision in accordance with section 2(1), para (1) of the Act and section 171(2) of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
In other situations, complaints of award procedures, see section 7(2) of the Act, must be lodged with the Danish Complaints Board for Public Procurement before the expiry of:
1) 45 calendar days after the contracting authority has published a notice in the Official Journal of the European Union that the contracting authority has entered into a contract. The deadline is calculated from the day after the day when the notice was published;
2) 30 calendar days calculated from the day after the day when the contracting authority has notified the candi-dates concerned that a contract based on a framework agreement with reopening of competition or a dynamic purchasing system has been entered into where the notification has included an explanation of the relevant grounds for the decision;
3) 6 months after the contracting authority entered into a framework agreement calculated from the day after the day when the contracting authority notified the candidates and tenderers concerned, see section 2(2) of the Act and section 171(4) of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
4) 20 calendar days calculated from the day after the contracting authority has submitted notification of its decision, see section 185(2) of the Danish Public Procurement Act;
Not later than at the time of lodging a complaint with the Danish Complaints Board for Public Procurement, the complainant must notify the contracting authority in writing that a complaint has been lodged with the Danish Complaints Board for Public Procurement and whether the appeal was lodged during the standstill period, see section 6(4) of the Act. In cases where the complaint was not lodged during the standstill period, the complainant must furthermore indicate whether a suspensory effect of the complaint has been requested, see clause 12(1) of the Act.


Winner: Anaconda Inc.
Award value: 425000
Number of bids: 5