Public procurement notice: Contract Award Notice
Published: 2018-01-17
Buyer: Danish Defence Acquisition and Logistics Organizations
Country: DK
Contract type: Supplies
Procedure: Open procedure
CPV classification: 33157110 | 33157200 | 33157700 | 35000000: Security, fire-fighting, police and defence equipment | 39523000
Estimated value: 12000000 DKK
Award criteria: The most economic tender

Technical requirements: The acquisition concerns delivery of parachutist oxygen systems and is intended to be used for high altitude jumping in the Danish Defence.
The oxygen system is the overall description of the solution sought after by DALO. More specifically, to fulfill the requirements stated in the tendering material, the tender must be able to deliver.
A part of the evaluation of the offers consist of a user test scheduled to take place at the premises of SOKOM in Aalborg, Denmark, cf. more specifically in the Instructions to Tenderes part 7.3. It is important that the offered oxygen systems are ready for testing at the given dates. DALO expects to make an initial purchase of DKK 7-8 mio. after commencement.
As part of the first delivery of the oxygen system, the tender must enable a user course in order to train the parachutists and jumpmasters to fully use the oxygen systems. The tender must also in relation to the first delivery enable a technical course that enables the engineers and technicians of the Danish Defence Workshop (FH) to maintain and service the oxygen system. Please see Appendix A for further details of the education.
The tenderer must, upon request, be able to provide service to the end-users and deliver spare parts and subcomponents to these. The services refered to are both to be performed at the places of the Danish Defence Workshop and at the premises of the Supplier. It is however important to note that it is an optional use of the Supplier by DALO, as DALO also has an inhouse capacity performing the services.
The framework agreement is not divided into lots on the grounds that a division of the contract would undermine the economies of scale obtainable by procuring 1 contract.
The Agreement is entered into by DALO. However, all divisions of the Danish Ministry of Defence, including all units of the Danish Defence subject to the command of the Chief of Defence is entitled to use the Agreement.
Precision Technic Defence has in this tender acted as an agent for the US based company Airborne Systems.
Pursuant to Section 3 of the Danish Consolidation Act no. 593 of 2 June 2016 on the Complaints Board for Public Procurement (available at www.retsinformation.dk), the following time limits for filing a complaint apply:
Complaints regarding public procurements and decisions subject to Chapter II or III of the Public Procurement Act, which does not concern a candidate not being invited to tender, must in accordance with § 7(2) of the Act on The Complaints Board for Public Procurement be filed with The Complaints Board for Public Procurement within:
1) 45 calendar days after the contracting authority has published a contract award notice in the Official Journal of the European Union (with effect from the day following the publication date).
2) 30 calendar days starting the day after the contracting authority has informed the tenderers in question, that the contracting authority has entered into a contract based on a framework agreement through reopening of competition or a dynamic purchasing system, provided that the notification includes a short account of the relevant reasons for the decision.
3) 6 months starting the day after the contracting authority has sent notification to the tenderers involved that the contracting authority has entered into the framework agreement, cf. § 2(2) or § 171(4) of the Public Procurement Act, provided that the
4) 20 calendar days starting the day after the contracting authority has published a notice concerning his decision to uphold the contract, cf. § 185(2) of the Public Procurement Act.
The complainant must inform the contracting authority of the complaint in writing at the latest simultaneously with the lodge of the complaint to The Complaints Board for Public Procurement stating whether the complaint has been lodged in the standstill period, cf. § 6(4) of the Act on The Complaints Board for Public Procurement. If the complaint has not been lodged in the stand-still period, the complainant must also state whether it is requested that the appeal is granted delaying effect, cf. § 12(1) of the said Act.


Winner: Precision Technic Defence
Award value: 12000000
Number of bids: 2