Case: Ahmedabad Manufacturing &amp; Calico Printing Co. Ltd. &amp; Others Vs. State of Gujarat &amp; Others

1. These are twelve Writ Petitions by diverse textile mills and other factories of Ahmedabad challenging the imposition of the Education Cess pursuant to the Gujarat Education Cess Act, 1962. As the contents of all petitions are the same, it will be sufficient if we refer to the petition filed by the Ahmedabad Manufacturing and Calico Printing Co. Ltd. (Writ Petition No. 12 of 1967). Before we do so, we shall state the scheme of the Cess Act relevant to the present purpose2. On October 9, 1962, the Gujarat Education Cess Act, 1962 became law. It is an Act to provide for the creation of a fund to promote education in the State of Gujarat. The Act applies to the City of Ahmedabad as constituted under the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949. Under the Cess Act, education cess is levied on lands and buildings which have the meanings given to them under the relevant Local Authority Law, here the Corporation Act. "Land", however, includes things attached to earth or permanently fastened to anything attached to the earth. Education cess is collected either as a surcharge on lands assessed to land revenue or a tax on lands and buildings in urban areas and the charging section reads :"S. 3: For the purpose of providing for the cost of promoting education in the State of Gujarat, there shall be levied and collected in accordance with the provisions of this Act and education cess which shall consist of -(a) a surcharge on all lands except lands which are included within a village site and not assessed to land revenue :(b) a tax on lands and buildings in urban areas""Village Site" means the site of a village, town or city determined under S. 126 of the relevant Code which in this case is the Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 and "urban area" means an area which is for the time being included in the limits of a city, municipal borough etc. The mode of calculation of the surcharge and of the tax and of their collection are contained in chapters III and IV. Chapter III deals with surcharge on land and is divided into two parts A and B. Part A deals with surcharge on agricultural lands and part B deals with surcharge on lands used for non-agricultural purposes. Chapter IV deals with tax on lands and buildings. For the purposes of the present writ petitions, we shall have occasion to refer to S. 5 from Part A and S. 7 from Part B of Ch. III and S. 12 from Ch. IV. Under S. 5, a surcharge is levied at the rate of 20 paise on every rupee of every sum assessed as land revenue on all lands (except lands included within a village site and not assessed to land revenue) which are assessed or held for the purpose of agriculture and not used for any purpose unconnected with agriculture. In simple language, it means the surcharge is 20 per cent of the amount of land revenue assessed on land not within a village site, not assessed to land revenue, and not used for any purpose unconnected with agriculture. Under S. 7, the surcharge is additional to non-agricultural assessment of agricultural lands used for non-agricultural purposes. The surcharge here ranges from 121/2 per cent to 75 per cent of the non-agricultural assessment depending on the kind of non-agricultural use of the land Under Section 12, a tax on lands and buildings situated in urban urea is levied at varying rates depending on the use to which the lands and buildings are put. In every case, the tax is a percentage of the annual letting value which means the rateable value of annual letting value or gross annual letting value of lands and buildings determined in accordance with the relevant local authority law which as stated earlier is the Corporation Act. The rate applicable to lands and buildings used for purposes of trade, commerce, industry, profession or business is 3 per cent of the annual letting value. It has now been raised to 4.5 per cent from October 1, 1965.

Court's reasoning:
4. It will be noticed that education cess is of three separate kinds. It is (a) a surcharge on land revenue assessed on purely agricultural lands, or (b) a surcharge on non-agricultural assessment in respect of lands used for non-agricultural purposes or (c) a tax on lands and buildings which do not bear land revenue. The properties in Ahmedabad are in three zones which may be described as demarcated by three concentric circles. In the inner zone are situated properties which do not bear land revenue and no surcharge, is therefore payable in respect of lands and buildings. Properties in this zone were exempted from the payment of land revenue under S. 128 of the Bombay Land Revenue Code in Ahmedabad in common with other towns and cities in which there had been formerly a city survey. In the middle zone are situated lands which though originally agricultural lands have been diverted to non-agricultural use and the lands and buildings, therefore, bear both municipal tax and non-agricultural assessment. In the outer zone are lands which are purely agricultural and they bear land revenue but no other charge5. The textile mills of the petitioners are situated in the middle zone within the municipal limits of Ahmedabad and the main complaint in these cases is that by reason of their situation, these mills have to pay both the surcharge as well as the tax whereas the owners of property in the other two zones bear either a surcharge on the land revenue or a tax on the annual letting value. It is also contended that the preparation of the assessment book having been struck down by this Court in the case cited earlier by us, the tax under S. 12 is no longer leviable and S. 12 having become inoperative, the Cess Act must fall as a wholeIn our judgment it does not. Section 12 lays down that the tax on lands and buildings situated in urban areas shall be collected at the rate of 3 per cent of the annual letting value (now 4.5 per cent) where a building or land is used for the purpose of trade, commerce, industry, profession or business. This rate is applicable to the annual letting value as determined under the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act. If as a result of the decision of this Court the assessment book needs revision or the principles on which valuation must be based have to be laid down afresh by the Legislature, the provisions of S. 12 of the Cess Act do not fail automatically. They will fasten on the new valuation when made. This cannot affect the validity of the section in the mean time. The section remains on the statute book to be worked into such assessment book as may hereafter emerge. The argument that S. 12 has failed must be rejected8. The three zones are the result of the operation of different laws in rural and urban areas. Lands subjected to city survey and assessed to property-tax are saved from the imposition of land revenue to which all lands are normally subject. This exemption is a hundred years old and is based on the fact that land in the heart of the city ceases to be agricultural. Similarly lands in the outer circle are free from municipal assessment because they are outside municipal limits and do not benefit from the municipal services. They are subject to land revenue only. The middle zone comes into being because the owners and holders of agricultural lands are not content to hold land for agriculture but divert it to other uses. In course of time the limits of the municipality have to be revised and these lands are taken within the municipality which means that they begin to share in the municipal services. They are therefore, assessed to municipal taxes as a return for the services renderedThe cess is nothing more than an addition to existing taxes. As it is a percentage of another tax, the determination of the cess is not by an independent assessment. It is an arithmetical calculation based on the result of assessment under other Act or Acts. Those Acts allow the raising of objections and provide for appeals. It is only the result of assessment after scrutiny, objection and appeals which forms the basis for the application of a percentage. There is no need for further scrutiny, objection or appeals. Nor is the Cess Act bad because it is not self-contained in the matter of assessment. In all cases of imposition of cesses for special administrative purposes (such as health cess, road cess, education cess, etc.) this method is followed. Being an addition to another tax this is the only method possible. The legislation on the subject of the imposition, levy and collection of a cess is made complete by incorporation of and reference to another piece of legislation. This practice is neither ineffective nor unconstitutional and cannot be said to be bad.