Case: S.L. Ahmed &amp; Others Vs. Union Of India &amp; Others

1. The petitioners are Radio Operators Grade-III (Naik) in the Signals Branch of the Central Reserve Police Force.(Revised Pay) Rules, 1973 they have been placed in the pay scale Rs. 225-308 when they were entitled to the pay scale Rs.the writ petition came on for hearing in the first instance, a Bench of this Court made an order on December 19, 1979 providing an opportunity to the petitioners to put in a representation before the Government and requiring the Government to dispose of the representation. The petitioners did make the representation and the Government considered it but the relief claimed by the petitioners was denied. In accordance with the further directions contained in the order dated December 19, 1979 this writ petition has now come on for consideration on itsCentral Reserve Police Force forms a part of the Ministry of Home Affairs in the Government of India, and it has a Signals Branch in which one of the categories is that of Radio Operators Grade-III (Naik). The petitioners say that Naik Radio Operators are appointed either by direct recruitment, in which case the candidate is required to be a Matriculate or its equivalent, or by promotion from the rank of Constable, in which case the Constable should have passed the Radio Operators Grade-III course. Originally, members of the Central Reserve Police Force of the rank of Naik enjoyed the pay scale Rs. 85-110, and Naik Radio Operators were given a special pay of Rs. 30 in view of their special qualifications and the specialised nature of their duties. By its order dated April 23, 1970 the Central Government appointed the Third Pay Commission to make recommendations in regard to the structure of the emoluments and the conditions of service of different classes of Central Government employees. The Commission submitted its final report to the Central Government on March 31, 1973. Paragraph 30 of Chapter 29 of Part I of Volume 2 contains the recommendations in respect of Radio Mechanics in the Central Reserve Police Force. ItPost of Radio Mechanic, Grade-I in the CRP and Sub-Inspector (Radio Mechanic) in the BSF are on the scale of Rs. 150-10- 290-15-380, but the Diploma holders are given the scale of Rs. 180-10-290-15-380. We recommend for these posts the scale of Rs. 380-560 but the Diploma holders working on these posts should be remunerated on the scale of Rs. 245-700. Below this level, posts of Radio Mechanic, Grade-II and the Radio Operators are on the scale of Rs. 150-10-210 or on the scale of Rs 125-3-131-4-155 with a special pay of Rs. 35 per month and we recommend that these posts should be given the scale of Rs. 330-480. For the posts of Radio Fitter on the scale of Rs. 125-3-131-4-155 we recommend the scale of Rs. 320-400.Admittedly, no reference has been made therein to Radio Operators Grade III (Naik). Following the recommendations of the Third Pay Commission the Central Government framed the Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 1973 which came into force on January 1, 1973. The petitioners exercised their option in favour of the revised pay scales. They were paid a salary of Rs. 250 with a special pay of Rs. 30 from January, 1975 for a few months, together with arrears on that basis for the years 1973 and 1974. The petitioners accepted the revised pay and special pay although they say, it fell short of the pay to which they were entitled. Subsequently, in April, 1975, the petitioners were placed in the revised pay scale Rs. 225-308 given to Naiks and the excess amount paid earlier to them was sought to be recovered by deducting from future payments of their salary.5. Aggrieved by the refixation of their pay and the deduction of the excess already paid, they have filed the present writ petition.

Court's reasoning:
6. So far as the deduction is concerned, this Court has already directed by its order dated December 19, 1979 that the Government should restore to the petitioners the excess amount already recovered from them. Nevertheless, it will be necessary to examine the validity of the refixation of the salary now paid to the petitioners inasmuch as that question is relevant for the period commencing from the date from which salary has been actually paid on the refixedthe basis of the recommendations of the Third Pay Commission, the pay scales of all Central Government employees, including personnel in the para-military forces, were revised with effect from January 1, 1973. Under the original pay scales, Naik Radio Operators were placed on the scale Rs. 85-110 with a special pay of Rs. 30 in view of their special qualifications and the specialized nature of their duties. They were entitled to allowances calculated on the aggregate of their basic pay and special pay. The Commission prescribed a scale of Rs. 225-308 for the post of Naik, but did not make any separate recommendation in respect of the posts of Radio Operators Grade- III (Naik). Inasmuch as before the revision of the pay scale the scale of a Naik and Radio Operator Grade-III (Naik) was the same, that is to say, Rs. 85-110, the revised pay scale for the post of Radio Operators Grade-III (Naik) was raised to the same level as that prescribed for the post of Naik, that is to say, Rs. 225-308, and in view of their special qualifications and the specialized nature of their duties Radio Operators Grade-III (Naik) were given a special pay of Rs. 30 also.We are satisfied that Radio Operators Grade-III (Naik) have to be considered substantially on the same basis as Naiks in the Central Reserve Police Force, and it is because of their special qualifications and of the specialised nature of their duties that they have been provided a special pay in addition. It may be mentioned that ever since 1975 Radio Operators Grade-III (Naik) are selected only from the rank of Constables on the General Duty Side. The revised pay scale of Radio Operators of the rank of Head Constable as well as Head Constables on General Duty is Rs. 260-350, with a special pay of Rs. 40 to Head Constables (Radio Operators). This post is the immediately next higher post above the rank of Naik, and it is apparent that there would be no justification of giving to the petitioners, who are junior in rank, the pay scale Rs. 260-430.12. The petitioners have also contended that they should be paid at par with comparable Government employees on the civil side. This claim is refuted by the respondents who point out that the petitioners are entitled to certain benefits not available to the others. Learned Counsel for the respondents has listed before us a number of such benefits. It is pointed out that the petitioner are entitled to casual leave for a period of twenty days as against casual leave for a period of twelve days for Government employees on the civil side, earned leave for a period of sixty days as against earned leave for a period of thirty three days for Government employees on the civil side, and rent free accommodation or house allowance at 10% of the salary in contrast to Government employees on the civil side who are liable to pay 10% of the salary if accommodation is provided.13. We are not satisfied that the petitioners are entitled to the pay scale Rs. 260 430.14. The second point requires us to consider the validity of the refixation of the pay of the petitioners when they were receiving Rs. 250 with a special pay of Rs. 30. According to the recommendations of the Third Pay Commission, the existing pay scale of a Government servant drawing basic pay upto Rs, 1800 per month was to be augmented by an amount representing five percent of the basic pay subject to a minimum of Rs. 15 and a maximum of Rs. 50. The Government of India Memorandum No. F. 67/II/13/74-IC dated May 17, 1974 directed that special pay was not to be included in the existing emoluments for the purpose of determining the accretion where in addition to the revised pay also. The revised pay actually paid to the petitioners initially was computed in error inasmuch as when fixing the pay in the revised scale the special pay was taken into account for the purpose of computing the accretion. It, therefore, became necessary to recompute the amount payable to the petitioners and to reduce it to the level now paid to them. It has not been shown to us that the basis adopted for refixation of the pay is invalid.