Case: Auto Engineering Works Vs. Bansal Trading Company and others

3. The appellant filed a suit in the Court of the learned Additional District Judge, West Tripura (Agartala). It was a money suit. The trial Court held that it had no territorial jurisdiction to entertain the plaint. The trial Court, however, declined to exercise power under Order 7 Rule 10 of the Civil Procedure Code and did not return the plaint to the appellant for presentation to the proper forum. The appeal filed by the appellant before the High Court failed on 28.11.1997. Hence, this appeal by special leave.

Court's reasoning:
4. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, we are of the opinion that the trial Court fell in error in not directing the return of the plaint to the appellant for presentation to the proper forum and the High Court also likewise fell in the same error. The terms of Order 7 Rule 10 of the Civil Procedure Code are clear and specific. After having found that it had no territorial jurisdiction to entertain the plaint, the trial Court ought to have returned the plaint to the appellant for presentation to the proper forum. We, therefore, set aside the order of the trial Court to the extent it refused the plaint to the appellant for presentation to the proper forum and direct that the plaint shall be returned to the appellant for its presentation to the proper forum. After the plaint is so presented to the Court having jurisdiction, the case shall be decided by the trial Court in accordance with law on its own merits.