Case: National Co. Ltd. Calcutta Vs. Deputy Director Of Tax Credit (Exports)Calcutta &amp; Ors

The appellant owns a jute mill situate at Rajgunj Railway Station, Andul, District Howrah, in the State of West Bengal and among other jute products it manufactures jute carpet backing cloth at its jute mill. The appellant exported diverse quantities of jute carpet backing cloth manufactured by it to various countries during the period 13th July, 1966, to 30th November, 1966. There was a tax credit certificate scheme framed by the Central Government under section 280ZE read with section 280ZC ofthe Income-tax Act, 1961. The scheme was called the Tax Credit Certificate (Exports) Scheme, 1965. The scheme provided for grant of tax credit certificate in respect of certain categories of goods or merchandise specified in column 2 which were exported to destinations specified in column 4 and the dates of export of which fell after 28th February, 1965, for an amount calculated at the rates specified in column 3 of the Table attached to the scheme. Jute carpet backing cloth was covered by item 1 in column 2 of the Table which specified " goods made of jute not otherwise specified ". If the scheme had remained unamended, the appellant would have been entitled to tax credit certificates in respect of the exports made by it of jute carpet backing material, but a notification was issued by the Central Government on 6th June, 1966, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 280ZE read with section 280ZC, whereby paragraph 3 of the scheme which provided for grant of tax credit certificates was amended by re-numbering that paragraph as sub-paragraph (1) and adding a sub-paragraph (2) to the following effect" No certificate shall be granted under sub-paragraph (1) in respect of any sale proceeds referred to in that sub-paragraph or part of such sale proceeds, received after the 5th day of June, 1966, in India in accordance with the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 (VII of 1947) and the rules mades amendment had the effect of disentitling an exporter to tax credit certificate in respect of goods or merchandise exported by him in all cases where sale proceeds or part thereof were received in India after 5th June, 1966. The necessity for making this amendment in the scheme arose on account of devaluation of the Indian rupee which was made by the Central Government, as it was felt that in view of the devaluation it was not necessary to give any further incentive for export. But it was soon realised that this amendment of the scheme might work hardship in those cases where goods or merchandise were exported before 5th June, 1966, on the faith of the Scheme but for some reason or the other, the sale proceeds were not received until after that date and, therefore, a second notification dated 8th August, 1966, was issued by the Central Government further amending the Scheme in exercise of the powers conferred under section 280ZE read with section 280ZC by deleting sub-paragraph (2) and instead, adding a proviso which provided for grant of tax credit certificate in respect of goods or merchandise exported on or before 5th June, 1966, even if the said proceeds were received after that date and declared that in the case of goods exported after 5th June, 1966, the rate specified in column 3 of the Table shall be deemed to be nil and no certificate shall be granted in respect of such goods or merchandise. The exports of jute carpet backing cloth made by the appellant were admittedly after 5th June, 1966, and hence both the notifications adversely affected the appellant by disentitling it to tax credit certificates in respect of these exports. The appellant, therefore, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Calcutta for a writ of mandamus for quashing and setting aside both the notifications and directing the Central Government to consider the application of the appellant for tax credit certificates in respect of the exports without taking into account the two notifications. Though there were several grounds on which the validity of these two notifications was challenged in the writ petition before the High Court, only one ground was pressed before us on behalf of the appellant and we shall, therefore, refer only to that ground. That ground was that both the notifications were outside the power conferred on the Central Government under section 280ZE read with section 280ZC, since the Central Government had no power under these sections to make a scheme providing that no tax credit certificate shall be granted in case of any goods or merchandise at all. This ground found favour with the single judge of the High Court but on appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent, a Division Bench of the High Court took a different view and negatived the challenge. Since the writ petition was dismissed by the Division Bench, the appellant preferred the present appeal after obtaining a certificate of fitness from the High Court

Court's reasoning:
This contention, though it found favour with the single judge of the Calcutta High Court who heard the writ petition in the first instance, is in our opinion wholly without force and cannot be sustained. A mere look at the scheme of the provisions of sections 280ZC and 280ZE is sufficient to expose the invalidity of this contentionSub-section (1) of section 280ZC undoubtedly provides that a person who exports any goods or merchandise out of India after 28th February, 1965, and receives the sale proceeds thereof in India in accordance with the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947, and the rules made thereunder, shall be granted a tax credit certificate for an amount calculated at a rate not exceeding 15 per cent. of the amount of such sale proceeds. But this right conferred on an exporter is subject to the other provisions of section 280ZC and these other provisions include sub-sections (2) and (3). Sub-section (2) provides in so many terms that the goods or merchandise in respect of which a tax credit certificate shall be granted under sub-section (1) and the rate at which the amount of such certificate shall be calculated, shall be such as may be specified in the scheme. It is, thus, left to the scheme to be framed by the Central Government to specify the goods or merchandise in respect of which an exporter shall be entitled to tax credit certificate as also the rate at which the amount of such certificate shall be calculated. It is not in respect of every category of goods or merchandise that an exporter can claim to be entitled to tax credit certificate but it is only in respect of such goods or merchandise as are specified in the scheme. The policy an the principle which would guide the Central Government in selecting the goods or merchandise for this purpose are set out in sub-section (3) which provides that in specifying the goods or merchandise as also the rates, the Central Government shall have regard to the various factors set out in that sub-section. These are the factors which would influence the choice of the Central Government in selecting the goods or merchandise for the purpose of grant of tax credit certificate and also in determining the rates at which tax credit certificate should be given. Section 280ZE, sub-section (1), confers power on the Central Government to frame one or more schemes in relation to tax credit certificate to be granted under section 280ZC and under sub-section (2), such scheme or schemes may provide, inter alia, for the goods or merchandise and the rate or rates for the purposes of section 280ZC. We fail to see how any obligation can be spelt out from these provisions requiring the Central Government to frame a scheme specifying the goods or merchandise in respect of which tax credit certificate shall be granted. It would indeed be absurd to suggest that the Central Government is under an obligation to make a scheme and the requirement of the statute would be satisfied so long as the Central Government specifies some goods or merchandise in the scheme. There is no reason why the Central Government should not be entitled to say that having regard to the factors set out in sub-section (3) of section 280ZC, it does not think it desirable that tax credit certificate should be granted in respect of any goods or merchandise for the time being. Sub-section (3) of section 280ZC confers power on the Central Government in so many terms to rescind a scheme made by it and that also supports the view that the Central Government may, keeping in view the factors set out in sub-section (3) of section 280ZC, decline to make a scheme or provide in the scheme that there shall be no goods or merchandise in respect of which tax credit certificate shall be granted.