Case: The Chamber Of Commerce, Hapur, And Three Others Vs. The State Of Uttar Pradesh Andtwo Others

2. The Chamber of Commerce, Hapur, is a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act with its registered office at Hapur. There are about 200 members of this Chamber of Commerce including petitioners Nos. 2 to 4. Petitioner No. 3 is also its ?resident and Petitioner No. 2 is also a member of its Executive Committee. The members of the Chamber carry on business in foodgrains including pulses both on ready and forward basis. The Chamber acts as a clearing agent for a commission and guarantees the performance of forward contracts by its members upon payment of margin money according to the rules.3. On or about the 1st September, 1945, the U. P. Government, in exercise of powers conferred on it by rule 81 (2) of the Defence of India Rules, issued Notification No. 8071/c.s. promulgating the United Provinces Food Grains (Futures and Options Prohibition) Order, 1945, (hereinafter called "the 1945 Order"). Section 2 (a) of that Order defined " foodgrains" as meaning any of the foodgrains mentioned in the schedule thereto. Arhar, peas, urd and moong were mentioned as items 6, 7, 8 and 9 of that schedule.The Defence of India Rules expired on the 30th September, 1946, and consequently all orders made thereunder were also due to expire on the same date. On the 1st October, 1946, however, there came into force the Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Ordinance, 1946 (hereinafter referred to as "the 1946 Ordinance") promulgated by theand published in the Gazette of India on the 25th September, 1946.5. Section 3 of that Ordinance conferred on the Central Government extensive powers to control production, supply, distribution of and trade and commerce in, essential commodities as defined in section 2(a) thereof. Section 4 authorised the Central Government to direct by notified order that the power to make orders under section 3 should, in relation to such matters and subject to such conditions as might be specified in the direction, be excercisable also by such officer subordinate to it or by such Provincial Government or such officer thereof as might be specified in the direction.The 1945 Order, therefore, continued in force until other provisions were made under the 1946 Ordinance.In exercise of powers conferred on it by section 4 of the 1946 Ordinance the Government of India, on the 21st October, 1946, made the notified order No.directing that the powers conferred on it by section 3(1) of that Ordinance should, in relation to foodstuffs, be exercisable also by any Provincial Government, subject to certain conditions therein set out.In November, 1946, was passed the Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, 1946 (hereinafter called "the Act"). Section 3 of the Act reproduced section 3 of the 1946 Ordinance with certain modifications not material for our present purpose. Section 4 of the Act corresponds to section 4 of the 1946 Ordinance.In exercise of powers conferred on it by section 4 of the Act the Central Government, by Notification No. C. G.dated the 5th March, 1947, amended the abovementioned notified order No. PYdated the 21st October, 1946, by inserting after the word "foodstuff" the words "including cocoanut oil but excluding other edible oils and oilseeds. " The net result of this notification was that "edible oils and oilseeds" were excluded from the scope or operation of the delegated power. In other words, the power delegated to the Provincial Government was withdrawn in respect of "edible oils and oilseeds" so that the Provincial Government could not thenceforth make any order controlling the production, supply and distribution of or trade and commerce in "edible oils and oilseeds".8. On the same day another Notification, being Notification No. C. G.was issued by the Central Government in exercise of powers conferred on it under section 3 of the Act directing that no order made or deemed to be made by a Provincial Government under the Act should have effect from that date so as to prohibit or restrict the movement of edible oilseeds or oils other than cocoanut oil from any place in a Province to any other place within or outside the Province, or so as to regulate or control the price, production or distribution thereof in any way. Therefore, the 1945 Order ceased to have effect so as to prohibit or restrict the movement of edible oilseeds or oils other than cocoanut oil or so to regulate or control the price, production or distribution thereof in any way.On the 15th November, 1947, two Notifications were issued by the Central Government. ByVI(1) made under section 4 of the Act the Central Government made a further amendment indated the 21st October, 1946. by insertingt; the words "and pulses other than gram". The effect of this amendment was that "pulses other than gram" were also excluded from the operation of the power delegated to the Provincial Governments. In other words, the power delegated to the Provincial Governments was withdrawn in respect also of "pulses other than gram", so that the Provincial Governments could not thenceforth make any order controlling the production, supply and distribution of or trade or commerce in edible oils and oilseeds and pulses other than gram.9. Simultaneously by) made on the 15th November, 1947, under section 3 of the Act the Central Government directed that no order made or deemed to be made under the Act by a Provincial Government should have effect from that date so as to prohibit or restrict the movement of pulses other than gram from any place in a Province to any other place within or outside the Province or so as to regulate or control the price, production or distribution thereof in any way. As a result of this Notification the 1945 Order also ceased to have effect so as to prohibit or restrict the movement of pulses other than gram or so as to regulate or control the price, production or distribution thereof in any way.Then came the Uttar Pradesh Foodgrains (Futures and Options Prohibition) Order,  1951. It was promulgated by the State of Uttar Pradesh on the 20th September, 1951. By section 2(a) this Order defined "foodgrains" as meaning any of the foodgrains specified in the schedule thereto. Arhar, peas, urd and moong were items Nos. 6, 7, 8 and 9 of that schedule.As the Uttar Pradesh Foodgrains (Futures and Options Prohibition) Order, 1951 directly made it illegal and a punishable offence for any person to enter into any futures in, amongst others, arhar, peas, urd and moong or to pay or receive or to agree to pay or receive any margin relating to any such futures. IO members of the Chamber of Commerce, Hapur, including the present petitioners Nos. 2 to 4, on the 29th October, 1951, made an application to this Court under article 32 of the Constitution forenforcement of their fundamental right under article 19(1)(g) to carry on their business and prayed for the issue of a mandamus restraining the State of Uttar Pradesh from enforcing the Uttar Pradesh Foodgrains (Futures and Options Prohibition) Order, 195 1, in so far as it related to pulses other than gram and from exercising any power there. under and for a declaration that section 2(a) read with items 6, 7, 8 and 9 of the schedule thereto was illegal and ultra vires the powers of the State Government.That application succeeded and the offending Notification to the extent it dealt with arhar, peas, urd and moong was declared invalid and the State of Uttar Pradesh was directed to abstain from giving effect to it. As will appear from the judgment pronounced by this Court on the 15th May, 1952, on that application, it was not seriously disputed that the effect of the amendments referred to above was that the power to control and regulate trade originally delegated to the Provincial Government bydated the 21st October, 1946, was modified so as to exclude from the scope of such delegation pulsesgram".11. On the 10th June, 1953, a letter (Ex. B to the petition) was addressed by the Deputy Commissioner, Food, Uttar Pradesh, to all Regional Food Controllers and Deputy Regional Food Controllers and all District Magistrates in Uttar Pradesh instructing them to regard all futures in foodgrains mentioned in the schedule to the 1945 Order including pulses other than gram as punishable. The reasoning advanced was that the Uttar Pradesh Foodgrains (Futures and Options Prohibition) Order, 1951, having been declared ultra vires by the judgment pronounced by this Court on the 15th May, 1952, that Order became unenforceable and consequently the 1945 Order continued in force. A copy of this letter was forwarded, amongst others, to the Chamber of Commerce, Hapur, for information and guidance.12. By its letter dated the 25th June, 1953, the Chamber pointed out that the earlier Order of 1945 had been withdrawn by section 9 of the Order of 1951 and as the last mentioned section had not been declared ultra vires by the Supreme Court the 1945 Order could not be regarded as continuing in force. On the 17th September, 1953, the Regional Food Controller of Uttar Pradesh wrote a letter (Ex. D to the petition) to the President, Chamber of Commerce, Hapur, asking the latter to immediately stop all future transactions pertaining to the foodgrains mentioned in the schedule to the 1945 Order in which delivery was contemplated within the State of Uttar Pradesh and threatening action to be taken against the Chamber. This threat of action necessitated the present petition for the reliefs mentioned above.The subsequent amendments made by Notification No. C.G.dated the 5th March, 1947, and(1) dated the 15th November, 1947, withdrew the power so delegated only with respect to "edible oils and oilseeds and pulses other than gram" and such withdrawal was only with regard to the production, supply and distribution of those commodities but not with regard to trade and commerce therein. The second ground advanced is that the Order of 1951 having been declared ultra vires the Order of 1945, which was continued first by section 5 of the 1946 Ordinance and then by section 17 of the Act, remained in full force.In our judgment there is no substance in either of the two arguments.

Court's reasoning:
In our judgment there is no substance in either of the twowe have already pointed out, two Notifications were published on the 5th March, 1947, and two Notifications were issued on the 15th November 1947. By Notification No. C. G.dated the 5th March, 1947, andI (1), dated the 15th November, 1947, the earlier Notification No.dated the 21st October, 1946, was amended by inserting therein the words "edible oils and oilseeds" and "pulses other than gram" and thereby excluding those commodities from the scope of the delegation. As a result of these amendments the Provincial Governments could not, from and after the respective dates of those amending Notifications, make any order controlling production, supply, distribution of or trade and commerce in those commodities. These Notifications did not puport to affect Notifications that had been previouslymade. But simultaneously with these amending Notifications two more Notifications were issued, namely, Notification No. C.G.dated the 5th March, 1947, and2), dated the 15th November, 1947. By these Notifications the Central Government directed that no order made or deemed to be made under the Act by a Provincial Government should have effect so as to prohibit or restrict the movement of edible oils and oilseeds and pulses other than gram or to regulate or control the price, production or distribution of those commodities in any way. As a result of the joint operation of these Notifications the 1945 Order ceased to have effect so as to prohibit or restrict the movement of edible oils and oilseeds and pulses other than gram or to regulate or control the price, production or distribution of those commodities. As that Order of 1945 ceased to have effect with regard to the price, production, distribution and movement of those commodities, it is not easy to comprehend how that Order could continue to regulate or control trade or commerce in those commodities. Trade or commerce in any commodity cannot be controlled unless the price, production, distribution and movement of that commodity can also be controlled. It follows, therefore, contrary to the contentions of the State, that these two Notifications of 1947 quite effectively superseded the 1945 Order so far as it purported to regulate or control the price, production, distribution and movement of or trade and commerce in edible oils and oilseeds and pulses other than gram.15. The second branch of the argument is equally fallacious. It is wholly incorrect to say that the judgment pronounced by this Court on the 15th May, 1952, declared the Uttar Pradesh Foodgrains (Futures and Options Prohibition) Order, 1951, ultra vires and invalid in its entirety. That judgment only declared it invalid to the extent of the restrictions complained of by the then petitioners, namely, in so far as it purported to restrict dealings in edible oils and oilseeds and pulses other than gram. The rest of that Order of 1951 and in particular section 9 by which the 1945 Order had been withdrawn remained unaffected by that judgment of this Court. It is quite difficult to appreciate how, in the circumstances, the Order of 1945 can be regarded as having been revived by the judgment in respect of edible oils and oilseeds and pulses other than gram in spite of the express withdrawal of that Order by section 9 of the Order of 1951 which otherwise remains operative.16. In our judgment there is no substance whatever in either of the two branches of argument advanced before us and this application must succeed.Before concluding we desire to express our strong disapproval of the wholly unwarranted attitude adopted by the officers of the State of Uttar Pradesh. Assuming there was any substance in their contentions, the same should have been advanced before this Court on the previous occasion, for the contentions, if wellfounded, would have been a complete answer to that application. If the contentions were subsequently discovered, then the same should have been brought before the Court by way of review, if any review lay. Instead of adopting that straightforward course the officers of the State have sought to circumvent the decision of this Court on a flimsy pretext and covertly, to challenge its correctness on an obviously untenable plea which has not even the merit of a seeming plausibility. This conduct verges dangerously on a contempt of this Court. We desire to make it quite clear that we view with great disfavour such unworthy attempt to get round the decision of this Court.