Case: The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by Chief Secretary &amp; Others Vs. Union of India &amp; Others

2. The instant petiton have been filed by the petitioners for review of the judgment dated 2.12.2015 rendered by this Court in thewrit petitions and criminl appeal. The Review Petition (Crl.)of 2016 are barred by 208 days, whereas Review Petition (Crl.) No.27 of 2017 is barred by 358 days. There is no satisfactory explanation for condonation of such huge delay.

Court's reasoning:
3. Thus, though the present petitions are liable to be dismissed on the ground of delay itself, yet we have carefully gone the petitions for review, the judgment impugned and the papers connected therewith. We are satisfied that there is noerror apparent on the face of record of thecase, warranting reconsideration of the judgment. The instant petitions are without any merits.