=== Eickmeyer[m] is now known as Eickmeyer_ === Eickmeyer is now known as Eickmeyer__ === Eickmeyer_ is now known as Eickmeyer[m] === Eickmeyer__ is now known as Eickmeyer_E === Eickmeyer[m] is now known as Eickmeyer [08:42] tomwardill: hey ho, just wanted to point you to this livefs build failure with no build log since it's the second one I've noticed - I saw the same on gnome-photos/groovy/amd64 earlier but already retried that one so may have destroyed the evidence there. [08:42] https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/focal/ubuntu/+build/216234 [08:43] Laney: that usually means it failed to start building for whatever reason [08:43] I'll see if I can see anything in the logs [08:44] I'd retry but since it's the second one I stumbled over, there might be some kind of issue [08:48] twisted.internet.defer.CancelledError [08:48] err [08:49] there's one more: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/focal/ubuntu-server-live/+build/216253 [08:50] * tomwardill escalates to a cjwatson, scalingstack troubles? [09:36] Builders are a little unhappy, we're working on diagnosing the issue === SpecialK|Canon changed the topic of #launchpad to: Builders unhappy | Help contact: tomwardill (08:00 - 17:00 UTC) | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support and spam reporting: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad === ilasc_ is now known as ilasc [11:20] Is it just me or there's some problem with the launchpad builders? [11:21] All the builds fail with no logs and no visible error. [11:23] ondrej: I suspect you want to highlight tomwardill per topic! [11:23] ondrej: Just you ;) (I jest, sorry - as per topic, and scrollback if you have it, the builders are unhappy and we're in the process of figuring out why) [11:24] Damn, I was looking for topic and I missed the one single line. Thanks, I see it now. [11:25] We've got a lot going on in the topic tbh! [11:25] Ok, thanks. I'll be patient then. [11:26] and WeeChat has this weird color scheme that the topic is shown black on blue (e.g. almost invisible) [11:26] So, I had to look in the channel log [13:38] cjwatson: hi - you said the arm builders being somwhwat bad is a known case, and I see in the topic that they are "unhappy" [13:39] I just wanted to check - I probably can go on as usual and somewhen e.g. tomorrow hit retry on the failed builds right? [13:39] or did the debugging reach a state were more wide-reaching measures are required [13:39] tomwardill: ^^ FYI [13:39] in case you are involved as the topic states [13:41] cpaelzer: the arm builders are even more upset last I heard, but a retry when they're fixed should indeed work [13:41] or something along thos elines [13:44] ok, waiting for the topic to tell me about their newfound happiness then ... [13:51] It's not really builder unhappiness, it's something more central in the whole system [13:51] Haven't figured it out yet === gpiccoli_ is now known as gpiccoli [14:26] Rolled back buildd-manager to the previous revision and things seem much better now === cjwatson changed the topic of #launchpad to: Help contact: tomwardill (08:00 - 17:00 UTC) | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support and spam reporting: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad [14:27] I think I've bulk-retried most things that were failed as a result [14:27] Still leaves me with the problem of figuring out *why* [14:49] cpaelzer: fyi ^^ [14:50] thanks I see them building again [14:50] not yet dead :-) === erich is now known as E_Eickmeyer