[02:02] good morning [02:36] juliank: that might be bug 1873658, fixed in -proposed [02:36] bug 1873658 in desktop-file-utils (Ubuntu Focal) "Deb Files are not associated with an application that manages packages" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1873658 [02:43] Morning callmepk [03:21] morning duflu [06:38] good morning [06:38] goood morning desktopers [06:41] Morning didrocks and seb128 [06:41] biab [06:44] hey duflu, salut seb128 [06:44] hey duflu, salut didrocks, how are you? [06:44] good, thanks, and yourself? [06:45] I'm good thanks! [06:56] good morning [06:57] seb128, tired. We had just enough easing of restrictions for Mother's Day to go ahead. Though that probably doesn't explain it -- I slept heaps, just low quality [06:57] Hi ricotz [07:04] morning desktoppers [07:04] hey ricotz, marcustomlinson [07:06] Hi marcustomlinson [07:07] hwy didrocks and duflu [07:10] hey duflu, didrocks, marcustomlinson, seb128 [07:12] hi ricotz didrocks marcustomlinson seb128 [07:20] hey callmepk [07:21] hey hey ricotz and callmepk [07:35] good morning desktoppers, happy Monday! [07:39] morning oSoMoN [07:39] morning marcustomlinson [07:40] Hi oSoMoN [07:40] happy Monday oSoMoN [07:41] hey duflu [07:41] salut didrocks, ça va bien? [07:43] oSoMoN: ça va bien, merci, et toi ? :) [07:43] très bien [07:44] I was just showing and explaining IRC to my 7yo daughter, and she couldn't stop laughing at my nickname :) [07:44] ahah, unsure how insulted or proud you should be :) [07:46] amused, that's all [07:49] hi desktoppers, would someone please help me stop my PC suspending at the login screen? LP: #1874219 [07:49] Launchpad bug 1874219 in gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu) " PC suspends after 20 minutes at the login screen" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1874219 [07:49] it's a desktop PC, so is always on AC power [07:51] duflu: Interested to see the bug backlog graph this week :) [07:51] marcustomlinson, I got the impression you had done some things... Yeah I will update it before EOD [08:02] moin [08:03] hey hey Laney [08:03] moin Laney [08:08] Hi Laney [08:08] ginggs: left a comment on your bug [08:08] hey marcustomlinsonric callmepk, ricotz, how are you? [08:08] Laney, hey Laney, good long w.e? [08:10] marcustomlinson: thanks, giving that a try [08:11] salut seb128, ça va? [08:12] oSoMoN, ouais, ça va ! et toi ? === ondra_ is now known as ondra === clobrano6 is now known as clobrano [08:16] seb128 : Pretty good! how are you? [08:16] callmepk, I'm good [08:16] seb128, bien, merci! [08:16] shrug, libreoffice [08:16] what's up with it? [08:16] that help bug? [08:16] yes [08:16] I tried to upload the Debian package to a ppa unmodified [08:17] failed after 23 hours with a ENOSPACE in the ppa :/ [08:17] hey didrocks oSoMoN duflu seb128 [08:17] the log has those 'no obvious way to instantiate implementation' warning though, which doesn't have in Debian [08:17] so I expect the config would have been buggy and then it's not a difference in the package but in the depends versions or toolchain [08:18] I also tried to disabled Bsymbolic-function since that often creates issues but no luck [08:19] oSoMoN, seb128, this starts to look like some burried condition whether this is a "Debian" build [08:20] ricotz, those 'no obvious way to instantiate implementation' warnings in the log are weird [08:20] also the resulting binaries are fine [08:20] seb128, fyi http://people.ubuntu.com/~ricotz/libreoffice/main.xcd.diff [08:20] it's just a config problem, copying main.xcd from Debian makes F1 call the webbrowser on the documentation === icey_ is now known as icey [08:20] the last hunk looks pretty problematic [08:21] ricotz, the lack of all the DesktopBackend entries also no? [08:21] maybe [08:21] and how did you manage to get a pretty diff like that :p [08:22] but if replacements are not correctly filled this is a reall issue, which might not be restricted to main.xcd [08:22] right [08:22] numbertext is a diff with Debian [08:23] no? [08:24] I wish that Debian upload had successed in the ppa, it would have told me if those .xcd diff were still there [08:26] seb128, it is a switch to the internal dep, so might be handled wrong by the libreoffice buildsystem [08:26] right [08:42] marcustomlinson, seb128: thanks for your comments in the bug [09:53] Erm, yeah marcustomlinson you win (is that you?) https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vRDHPxGBHqM6XkT_S8ggtYfD0xchKSUD_z9PopNVE3G1rU05fVSnxDGcDsEstl7gu7N-tzCU6mLUp2V/pubchart?oid=254968654&format=interactive [09:56] duflu: boom [09:56] yeah cleaned out oldy mouldies [09:56] not without irritating a lot of people with all the bug mail of course [09:57] : [09:57] : [09:57] : [09:57] 🎤 [09:57] That was your delayed mic drop [09:57] Nice [09:58] :) [09:58] Morning o/ [09:58] marcustomlinson, I found in the past roughly 1 in 400 people got angry, which is sufficiently low [09:58] Morning Wimpress [09:58] duflu: and I was actually quite surprised by the number of positive reactions from users too [09:59] I got a fair amount of "thank you for saying _something_ on this bug" [10:00] even some negative reactions turned positive when I took the time to apologise and they realised there was a human watching the bug [10:00] I assume it most mostly silence [10:01] mostly yes, but if someone did reply I owed it to them to reply as well [10:03] hey Wimpress, wb, had a good week off? === cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer [10:13] marcustomlinson, that's amazing, thanks. I will also end my day on that good news [10:13] duflu: good night :) [10:29] seb128, nevermind my comment about the $(instdir) [10:29] ricotz, oh? [10:29] it's resolved at runtime? [10:30] seb128, $(insturl) is normal [10:30] yes [10:30] k [10:30] k [11:28] hi all. I came across this on twitter related to the software store in 20.04 and wanted to bring it to your attention if you weren't already aware of it [11:28] https://twitter.com/itsfoss2/status/1259735657020370944 [11:30] thanks for the heads up jphilips [11:31] marcustomlinson: any time. was going to mention it in the #ubuntu-quality channel, but wasnt sure there were any ubuntu team members in there other than wimpy [11:34] jphilips, https://bugs.launchpad.net/snap-store/+bug/1875450 most likely [11:34] Ubuntu bug 1875450 in snap-store "Doesn't provide search info to gnome-shell overview > search" [Low,Confirmed] [13:53] seb128, here is a shiny little bug for your next evo upload https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/1877852 ... :) [13:53] Ubuntu bug 1877852 in evolution (Ubuntu) "Evolution not showing unread count in dock, missing build-dep" [Undecided,New] [13:55] ogra; hey, thanks, I wonder when we regressed that and how :/ [13:57] has there been any reports of snapd slowing shutdowns - https://twitter.com/j4yav/status/1259824398871257088 [13:58] yeah ... [13:58] it is shiny with that feature though ... [13:58] ... and i was surprised how quick evo builds nowadays :) [13:58] jphilips, yes, a fix is in edge AFAIK [13:59] has been discussed on https://forum.snapcraft.io ... [14:00] (and in the #snappy channel as well) [14:01] ogra: thanks [14:03] jphilips, there is also https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/1877852 [14:03] Ubuntu bug 1877852 in evolution (Ubuntu) "Evolution not showing unread count in dock, missing build-dep" [Undecided,New] [14:03] err [14:04] sorry ... https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873550 [14:04] Ubuntu bug 1873550 in snapd (Ubuntu) "Snappy daemon reaches 1min30s timeout during shutdown process" [Undecided,Incomplete] [14:04] silly copy/paste ... [14:05] jphilips, please use launchpad for bug repiorts [14:09] seb128, would you mind sponsoring https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/adwaita-icon-theme/-/commits/ubuntu/focal/ to focal, please? [14:09] seb128: okay [14:09] oSoMoN, I can do that sure, thanks for working on the update :) [14:09] np, it was an easy one [14:11] ogra, oh, that's a new feature in fact, nice. We provided that with evolution-indicator ... did that one stop working for you? or did you just not have it installed? [14:30] seb128, i think one of the upgrades removed it ... (i didnt really stay long on 18.04, might have been that upgarde, I just used 18.04 to jump to 20.04 from 16.04) [14:31] ogra, can you try if reinstalling it fixes the issue without rebulding evolution? [14:32] ogra, would still be nicer to use the upstream variant but it's a bit annoying to enable, we are in sync with Debian and they don't have libunity so we would need to have a diff (or to get libunity to Debian ideally) [14:33] ah, k [14:33] hmm, the indicator pulls in all the old gconf-2 stuff alongside [14:34] oh :( [14:35] the feature is minimal, it probably makes sense to enable it for focal in the next upload [14:35] less annoyance and better out of the box experience [14:41] seb128, yeah, seems to work ... the indicator should perhaps be a recommends ? [14:42] ogra, I would rather avoid pulling gconf in by default, enabling the upstream support seems a better way [14:43] also better to maintain a one line control diff than maintaining an outdated source depending on gconf (which we will want to remove from the archive at some point) [19:07] seb128, well, i invalidated the bug anyway, guessing you might want to fix it in debian rather (once they pulled unity8 in they might also pull in libunity (IIRC even unity8 uses that) [19:18] ogra, right, libunity is standalone and would make sense there [19:19] +1