=== Anoia is now known as MissDee [11:54] sorry to disturb, but after changing my email (and confirming it), I can no longer log into launchpad / ubuntu one. Anybody around to help? [11:57] weird, old email address works [11:59] oh, how stupid of me, forgot totally about the ubuntu one separate id confirmation :) [11:59] solved! === karni is now known as karni-snack === karni-snack is now known as karni [14:31] <__marco> hello, I added a new email to my launchpad account but every time I send an email from that address I get an error: the command is not signed with an openpgp key [14:31] <__marco> before I did not need to sign the message [14:32] <__marco> why I get that error? [14:32] are you trying to manipulate bugs through the email interface or only add comments? [14:33] <__marco> I am trying to manipulate bugs [14:38] then you need to sign the message and AFAIK it was always so [14:47] <__marco> geser: Launchpad verifies incoming email by looking for a GNU Privacy Guard (GPG) signature by the sender, or a DKIM signature by a trusted sender domain, such as GMail [14:47] <__marco> geser: this is what exactly happened [14:48] <__marco> I switched from a gmail account === stokachu is now known as stokachu__ === stokachu__ is now known as stokachu === karni is now known as karni-afk === karni-afk is now known as karni [19:48] are PPAs i386/amd64 only, or has that changed? [20:02] teward: by default; other architectures can be supported via emulation to some extent, but only on request [20:02] (since lots of stuff fails that way and it's not worth the resources or confusion when it isn't actually needed) [20:02] cjwatson: typically it's just i386/amd64 though? [20:02] most PPAs just have the default setup, yes [20:03] cjwatson: and I assume the other architectures being requested are looked at on a case by case basis? [20:03] yes [20:03] (i.e. not always approved) [20:03] it would depend on things like load yes [20:03] our capacity has improved recently [20:04] it won't really be ideal until we have native virtualisation for the non-x86 architectures though [20:04] right [20:33] cjwatson: i'm maybe blind here, but you or someon on the LP team with regard to PPAs is better qualified to answer - http://askubuntu.com/questions/533789/repackaging-deb-with-an-alternate-target - looks like they want to use a PPA for something, but IDK whether PPA(s) are capable of that [20:33] (sorry for a 30 minute lagtime between pings) [20:35] teward: ok your response is way off base I'm afraid [20:35] I'll answer [20:35] cjwatson: i deleted it [20:35] cjwatson: i misunderstood their question :0 [20:35] cjwatson: hence the ping [20:35] :) [20:37] huh [20:37] cjwatson: to that end, I"m not sure they were precise enough with what they were trying to do, in their initial question. [20:37] (hence confusion) [20:38] doesn't matter because it's not doable (and really, shouldn't be done) [20:38] Nonsense [20:38] you can upload binary packages to a PPA? [20:38] oop i started an argument, i think i'll just go back to beating the nginx packages with a stick :) [20:38] Perfectly doable, it's just a cross-compiler [20:38] That's not what's being requested! [20:39] oh, well now it's more clear after the dits [20:39] edits [20:40] it just said "additional builds of binutils for other architectures" before [20:41] * dobey goes back to bashing his brains against online-accounts code [20:41] I posted an answer [20:43] dobey: that's what confused me, initially [20:43] dobey: it DOES help when people actually say what they mean, rather than be ambiguous :) [20:44] yeah, my first reading made me think he wanted to repack x86-64 builds as ia64 binaries [20:45] dobey: that's what i had thought as well