=== thumper is now known as thumper-afk === thumper-afk is now known as thumper === alf is now known as 6JTAAQ1J9 === ayan is now known as Guest70899 === kgunn is now known as Guest2511 === hyperair is now known as Guest84654 === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha [04:21] Good morning [05:29] hello === 6JTAAQ1J9 is now known as alf_ [08:04] hey hey [08:04] it's a fri-day [08:04] (/me checks calendar to make sure this is true) [08:05] Laney, hey, happy friday! [09:28] Laney, I think you have the chroot for that, can you try to crossbuild https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-018/+files/ubuntu-system-settings_0.3%2B14.10.20140711-0ubuntu1.dsc [09:28] I lost my utopic install [09:28] damn inspiron [09:28] seb128: can do - what's this? [09:28] how do you lose an install? [09:28] Laney, it's the currently in silo settings landing [09:28] which includes the port to python3 [09:28] look down the back of the settee [09:29] Laney, you try ubuntu-desktop-next, get Mir to lock, force power down the box, and the ext4 system messed up enough that the thing refuse to boot/get the kernel to throw a stacktrace at you on fsck runs [09:30] O_O [09:30] yeah... [09:30] so I'm downloading the current daily and doing a reinstall [09:30] that's fine, it's a test machine [09:30] but still, annoying [09:30] thought you were using an xps for that [09:31] that's the inspiron 11 [09:31] oh wtf [09:31] the touch one I had in malta [09:31] they look like the xps [09:31] a man of many laptops [09:31] lol [09:31] anyway this doesn't work [09:31] let me see [09:31] :-( [09:31] could be the archive [09:32] leo tested the crossbuild when he submitted [09:32] or he screwed up his testing [09:47] hum, nose config file doesn't seem to like having the same argument specified multiple times [09:47] like --with-foo=bar --with-foo=baz [09:47] while the command line takes it directly [09:48] the archive version fails to x-build too [09:49] * didrocks needs to use cov instead of coverage to be able to track subprocess coverage in integrations tests and only the first one supports that [09:49] (and to have command line and html reports, the same options is used twice) [09:54] Laney, I'm going to assume it's not an issue in settings, since leo had it run and work [09:55] could be a problem with my mirror [09:55] lemme try with archive.u.c [10:03] c [10:09] Laney, ? [10:13] I think it is working [10:13] my mirror was out of date [10:13] more accurately, it was skewed between archive and ports [10:15] yeah that worked [10:15] great [10:15] thanks for testing! [10:15] but it seems that it was uploaded already anyway [10:15] well, I just pressed the button [10:16] I can do m&c now that it's confirmed to work ;-) [10:16] I want to do another landing this afternoon for the ofono work [10:17] the background maybe as well [10:17] what happened to running pep8 during the build? [10:22] Laney, that's not happening anymore? [10:28] well I grepped the log for pep8 and don't see it [10:29] yeah, it's not run [10:30] are any of the tests run? [10:31] wait, I'm looking at it [10:31] you dropped that in r682 [10:31] llllllannnnnnnnnnnnnneeeeeeeeeyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy? [10:31] well, you dropped the overwrite [10:32] but I though the idea was to have that part of normal "make check" [10:32] right? [10:32] I'm trying to remember how that's supposed to work :p [10:32] yeah dh_auto_test should run the testsuite [10:33] it rusn "make test" [10:33] runs [10:33] you did a +add_test(NAME python COMMAND "${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/test_code.py") in r682 [10:34] * seb128 is looking at why that's not happening [10:34] check the build log from that version [10:34] 0411 in trusty, it does run tests [10:35] oh [10:35] it runs? [10:35] 4/6 Test #4: python3 .......................... Passed 0.35 sec [10:36] so it does [10:36] it's because tests don't run when cross building [10:36] * Laney runs [10:37] lol [10:37] well, at least good, one thing we didn't regress [10:46] seb128: can you toss this one in next time maybe? https://code.launchpad.net/~laney/ubuntu-system-settings/as-activation/+merge/225953 [10:46] didn't actually see that in practice but I did force it to happen [10:46] so not as important === Zdra is now known as xclaesse [10:52] Laney, sure, didn't you want to add tests for that? or same rational than the other one? [10:52] oh, just saw your comment, ok [10:53] https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-dbusmock/+bug/1340627 [10:53] Ubuntu bug 1340627 in python-dbusmock "Mock bus activated services" [Undecided,New] === qengho is now known as CardinalFang === CardinalFang is now known as qengho === MacSlow is now known as MacSlow|lunch === MacSlow|lunch is now known as MacSlow [11:59] bregma, couple of folks having issues with performance fwiw https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz/+bug/1293384 [11:59] Ubuntu bug 1293384 in compiz (Ubuntu) "Compiz CPU usage dramatically increased in Ubuntu 14.04" [Medium,Triaged] === alan_g is now known as alan_g|lunch [12:42] ok, I have my own config parser to replace the nose one for multiple repeated keys [12:43] because of the multiple options thing? [12:43] yeah [12:44] is that a bug on their part? or a "design decision"? [12:44] well, the issue isn't in nosetests but in the cov pluging [12:44] plugin [12:44] they shouldn't use the same arg multiple times [12:44] or you can't use config file [12:45] (configparser doesn't support that) [12:45] that somewhat makes sense [12:45] right [12:45] having the same argument multiple time is confusing [12:45] indeed [12:45] basically, what I'm passing is: [12:45] --cov-report=term-missing --cov-report=html [12:45] because I want the terminal output for coverage AND the html one [12:46] it's different options in the coverage modules [12:46] that I happily used until today [12:46] but for integration tests, I need to support subprocess() [12:46] and the coverage module doesn't [12:46] the nose-cov does [12:48] k, I see [12:48] having new fun every day ;-) [12:54] exactly :p [12:54] and I'm scratching my head on something related now as well… [13:05] waow, really weird [13:08] oh, I know… [13:09] what's the challenge this time? ;-) [13:10] I was wondering why in my new integration directory, the tests were not executed [13:10] tried multiple things, was thinking it was due to weird class name [13:11] but actually, nosetests only run tests from files starting with "test_" [13:12] oh, one convention you need to know then [13:12] yeah, I had multiple files like that, I just didn't think about it in this new dir [13:14] seb128: especially because tests in tests/__init__.py are taken into account [13:14] but not tests/large/__init__.py === alan_g|lunch is now known as alan_g === m_conley_away is now known as m_conley === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha === alan_g is now known as alan_g|tea === alan_g|tea is now known as alan_g [15:23] parallel builds really make a difference to webkit build time [15:23] * Laney zzzzzzzz [15:39] Laney, your as-activation seems to make some tests unhappy? [15:39] does it? [15:39] "dbus.exceptions.DBusException: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoServer: Failed to connect to socket /tmp/dbus-vHQLLI3uBn: Connection refused' [15:39] see https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/autopilot-testrunner-otto-utopic/1303/? [15:39] I retried and it did the same error on same test [15:40] I wonder if that's case where it was skipping the call before and now is trying to issue it [15:40] which test? [15:40] doesn't make much sense [15:41] /var/local/autopilot/autopilot.log: FAIL: ubuntu_system_settings.tests.test_about.AboutTestCase.test_imei_information_is_correct(with mouse) [15:41] ignore what I wrote [15:41] what does that have to do with AS? [15:41] that doesn't seem related [15:41] * Laney wibbles [15:41] yeah, I was just wondering if it's doing it there [15:42] hmm don't you get a video for these? [15:42] wait that's coming from the test itself [15:45] yeah, dunno what's going on there [15:45] other mps have the same issue in fact [15:52] bah that test works for me [15:58] same here [15:59] hateful [16:09] seb128: hi, can we do a landing for unity-gtk-module? https://code.launchpad.net/~indicator-applet-developers/unity-gtk-module/trunk.14.10/+activereviews [16:09] attente, hey, sure, it's friday 6pm here but I can do that next week [16:11] seb128: ah, sorry, have a good w.e! [16:11] attente, no worry, thanks, you as well! [16:11] * Laney stares at this trace [16:12] could it be apparmor? === alan_g is now known as alan_g|EOW [17:09] bye, have a good weekend! [17:15] have a nice week-end everyone, see you on Tuesday! === strycore_ is now known as strycore === ken_ is now known as kenvandine === m_conley is now known as m_conley_away [19:06] humm... anyone else having unity7 failing to start on login? [19:07] or maybe that's not the cause... [19:07] init: at-spi2-registryd main process ended, respawning [19:07] seb128, ^^ ideas? [19:08] kenvandine, stacktrace? [19:08] i guess this is what happens now that i'm not on the desktop team... are you punishing me? :-D [19:08] looking [19:08] no crash files... [19:08] what happens if you run it by hand? [19:08] the gnome session isn't working either [19:08] exit? segfault? hang? [19:08] reboot [19:08] seems like your system is hosed [19:09] hang... [19:09] i rebooted once... let me try again [19:09] bt? [19:09] i see a [19:09] can you get a bt of the hang? [19:09] need to do that from a vt [19:09] intel_do_flush_locked falied message [19:09] oh [19:09] i did just get a new kernel [19:10] try the previous one [19:10] or power down the box [19:10] yeah... thx [19:10] sometime the hardware get in weird start and reboot doesn't fix it, powerdown does [19:10] yw! [19:12] powerdown worked [19:12] same kernel [19:13] k [19:13] not ubuntu's fault then ;-) [19:13] blame the hardware