[02:36] How do i upload stuff directly? I got upload rights for parole a few days ago, but wasn't told how i use them [02:36] Noskcaj, dput [02:37] Do i need to target anywhere specific or will it just work? [02:37] Noskcaj: debsign foo.changes && dput ubuntu foo.changes [02:37] ok, ty [02:37] Noskcaj: On ubuntu, the default target should already be "ubuntu", but it never hurts to be specific either. [05:22] Although I generally change the default to something non-working so I don't upload to ubuntu when I mean a PPA. === heathjs is now known as heath [15:45] Hi folks. I would like to add a 1920x1080 display mode for undetected (as in "the f* switch blocks EDID") monitors to the gnome-control-panel "display" panel. From what I got from the source, the resolutions look like they are coming from a deeper component. Would anyone suggest the right place to add this? [18:57] yofel: Multiple dashes in Debian versions are generally not a good idea. [18:58] infinity: upstream version is "2.8.1-1", what should I change that to? [18:58] it's technically permitted, so I kept it... [18:59] yofel: I would have just gone with 2.8.1.1 or something, but meh. [18:59] yofel: You're right, there's nothing technically wrong with your version, but there are a lot of bad version string parsers out there. ;) [19:00] yeah, sadly ^^ [19:00] I can re-upload if you want? [19:00] yofel: That would probably make my inner pedant happy. [19:00] ok, let's do that then :D [19:01] yofel: Actually, nevermind. If that's really the upstream version, we'll call it good. [19:02] (Weird way to version though, thanks upstream) [19:02] it's thanks to them missing corruption before release, so we get 2.8.1 again, as... 2.8.1-1 -.- [19:03] Yeah. Just a strange way to re-version. ;) [19:03] The upstream I work most closely with (glibc) has had to re-roll before, and our method was 2.15 -> 2.15.0 [19:04] (And I guess if screwed up twice, we'd go with 2.15.0.0?) [19:04] (Or give up, because we're in the wrong business) [19:05] yofel: Anyhow, after thinking it over a bit, I accepted the upload. Don't bother redoing it. [19:05] yofel: was just a knee-jerk reaction to the ugly version. :P [19:05] most of the time at kde we either have enough time to catch any issues, or they just wait until the next version. Most of the time... [19:06] yeah, I can understand that ^^ [20:07] Laney: Was your cinnamon upload meant to address bug #1266336? [20:07] bug 1266336 in cinnamon (Ubuntu) "Cinnamon desktop hangs when selecting menu" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1266336 [20:39] Any chance of moving Trusy release to April 8? (end-date of Windows XP support) [20:39] fhassan: No. [20:41] fhassan: Releasing 9 days after that isn't exactly world-ending, it's not like XP users are all going to magically switch OSes on that day. It's also not like MS releases security updates every day. :P [20:43] XP users are by definition not the sort of people who jump at new OS releases ... [20:44] Indeed. [20:44] All the XP users who actually like new OS releases are probably on 7 or 8 by now (or, indeed, jumped ship for Linux or MacOS years ago) [20:47] infinity: nope, it was an FTBFS fix [20:50] Laney: Ahh, kay. Then I'll keep that blocking bug blocking it, then. :P [20:50] (Someone in Debian really needs to pick that stuff up again... Or remove it) [21:01] So, with Quantal coming to EOL sometime in April, is the supported upgrade path through the already EOL Raring or directly to Saucy?