[00:49] I have an sbuild/schroot setup... I'm building a source package that provides multiple binaries, and I was wondering if it was possible to build only one of the binary packages (since I'm only testing an app included in one and I don't want to bother building the others) [00:57] ryanakca: Generally, no. [01:06] RAOF: bummer, thanks [01:06] * ryanakca does wish that there were a better way than to rebuild kdebase-runtime everytime he tries somethig [01:09] Does kdebase-runtime actually _support_ only building part of it? [01:10] Also, distcc and or ccache are likely to be your friend. [01:13] RAOF: I had icecc before I reinstalled Intrepid... but this time around I foolishly took amd64 while all of the other computers on my LAN are i386... but I'll look into ccache, thanks :) [02:04] hmm. [02:07] hm? [02:08] ajmitch: eagles ban evasion, and me being incompetent at nick banning, it seems. [02:08] * Hobbsee usually goes for hosts [02:08] aha [02:09] * ajmitch dodges the pointy stick [02:09] ajmitch: do a /lastlog eagles and you'll see why. [02:18] * Hobbsee eyes the bantracker with interest, noting that some of the mroe recent trolls have been here under other nicks. [02:20] i think i have spotted a problem with II breaking other releases. is a kernel dev available to discuss? I was at ubuntu+1 but no joy there [02:22] when i installed II on sda2, i got xorg breakage on sda3 gutsy install. nvidia driver would not load on the gutsy partition after reboot. [02:22] slestak: This isn't the channel. [02:22] slestak: Perhaps #ubuntu-kernel. [02:22] Unlikely #ubuntu-devel. [02:22] Definitely not #ubuntu-motu. [02:22] wgrant: tyvm [02:23] assuming it's a kernel problem at all... [02:26] pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy: Depends: libgtk2.0 which is a virtual package. [02:26] according to packages.ubuntu.com it is NOT a virtual package [02:27] any ideas whats happening here? [02:27] ajmitch: #ubuntu-kernel is more likely than here, at any rate. [02:27] csilk: -0 [02:27] You're missing the -0 from the end. [02:28] ahha, thats what happens you try packaging at 2:28 am.. thanks wgrant :) === bluefox_ is now known as bluefox [03:20] I have this package I am building (bug 172804), but it depends on bug 275688 and bug 276151 [03:20] Launchpad bug 172804 in ubuntu "[needs-packaging] winff - GUI ffmpeg batch video converter" [Wishlist,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/172804 [03:20] Launchpad bug 275688 in fpc "Please sync fpc 2.2.2-3 (universe) with patch from bug #260464" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/275688 [03:20] Launchpad bug 276151 in lazarus "Please sync lazarus 0.9.24-0-12 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/276151 [03:20] especially the fpc sync is somewhat of an issue (newer upstream version) [03:21] anybody who can tell me how I should procede with 275688? [03:21] Why do we want this for Intrepid? [03:21] all packages work and build in my ppa [03:22] We are waaaay past FeatureFreeze. [03:22] And "Please sync fpc 2.2.2-3 (universe) with patch from bug #260464" doesn't make sense [03:22] Launchpad bug 260464 in fpc "fp-units-gtk2 has undefined references due to GtkFileSystemError removal from GTK" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/260464 [03:22] Ok, so I should wait till after Intrepid? What can I do in the mean time? [03:23] You can wait, or you can fix bugs. Ideally the latter. We need more bugfixes. [03:23] StevenK: what should I do to clarify? [03:24] wgrant: I have the fix for 260464, but I guess because of the newer upstream version it is not wanted? [03:25] Bug #260464 [03:25] Launchpad bug 260464 in fpc "fp-units-gtk2 has undefined references due to GtkFileSystemError removal from GTK" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/260464 [03:25] Elbrus: It looks fixed to me... [03:25] wgrant: what do you mean? [03:26] The problem is that the old version has more issues. [03:26] Bug #260464 appears to be fixed. [03:26] Launchpad bug 260464 in fpc "fp-units-gtk2 has undefined references due to GtkFileSystemError removal from GTK" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/260464 [03:26] wgrant: that is right, but the new version from debian had the same issue [03:26] so I had to apply the same patch [03:27] * Added dpatch to fix fp-units-gtk2 undefined references (LP: #260464) [03:27] - Safe to drop on next sync, Debian has a fixed version [03:27] Doesn't look like it to me. [03:27] disregarding the changelog mention, that is there because my package builds on debian [03:28] I also reported bug 260464 and discussed that with jdong [03:28] Launchpad bug 260464 in fpc "fp-units-gtk2 has undefined references due to GtkFileSystemError removal from GTK" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/260464 [03:28] That is the bug I'm talking about, yes. [03:28] that is how that remark arrived in the changelog [03:29] djong "gave up" on the current version and suggested I try syncing from debian [03:29] that works for me :) [03:29] It looks more like he fixed it, to me. [03:30] wgrant: what I mean, after the fix of bug 260464 my winff package still did not build due to errors, djong got worried and suggested the sync [03:30] Launchpad bug 260464 in fpc "fp-units-gtk2 has undefined references due to GtkFileSystemError removal from GTK" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/260464 [03:31] I don't think jdong 'gives up'. I think he gets distracted by other, shinier crack. [03:31] Elbrus: You said "I have the fix for 260464", but it's already fixed. [03:31] ScottK-laptop: sorry, not given up, but he mentioned he "would regret that he was the last uploader". [03:31] Yeah. [03:32] I've been there. [03:32] * wgrant too. [03:32] wgrant: I mean, I have the fix for bug 275688 [03:32] Launchpad bug 275688 in fpc "Please sync fpc 2.2.2-3 (universe) with patch from bug #260464" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/275688 [03:32] Remind me to never, ever sync python-numpy from Debian Experimental again. [03:32] (my .diff is attached as patch to the bug) [03:32] Elbrus: We don't want a new upstream version without very good reason. [03:33] wgrant: ok. I guess I just have to wait then. [03:34] Dear Launchpad: When I'm looking at the UBUNTU sponsorship bug list what posesses you to think I want to look at Debian or upstream bugs? [03:34] * Elbrus goes to fixing other bugs :) [03:35] ScottK-laptop: Launchpad has no idea that you are talking about Ubuntu. That team is a team - it has no affiliations with a distro. [03:35] ScottK-laptop: You could filter /ubuntu/+bugs by subscriber. [03:36] wgrant: Or I could get grumpy and kvetch some more about how Ubuntu isn't a priority for LP developers. [03:36] Which would be more fun? [03:37] ScottK-laptop: That one sounds good too. [03:39] It's OK though, I'm currently focusing my ire on cbds. [03:40] Apparently if you've only a single binary package it considers the .install optional and just installs everything into the one package. [03:40] When you're trying to make an existing complex package only build one binary, that's not what I want. [04:34] ScottK-laptop: well I got scared with fpc when the proposed fixes started escalating to syncing the whole compiler stack from Debian.... [04:34] at first if just a 10-line patch fixed the problem that's within my comfort zone, but I've learned when to stop over these years I've been around :) [04:35] ;-) [04:36] BTW, I understand backports is calling to you jdong. [04:37] ScottK-laptop: I've heard too; I'm trying to catch up on everything that has been bombarding me... [04:40] what is the name of the #channel for media-ubuntu ? [04:40] ScottK-laptop, jdong: it was not my intention get the name wrong, my first time remark was right. (but djong would be close to Dutch thats all ;) [04:41] Elbrus: I noticed the transposition, but figured it was a simple typo. I'm just giving him grief. [04:41] jdong: so I am sorry, I hope no hard feelings... [04:58] * ScottK-laptop decides to finish the bag of dark chocolate peanut M&M's. [04:59] * wgrant steals them first. [05:03] Elbrus: ack my ping script isn't working; no hard feeling at all. Sorry I wasn't able to help you further with FPC [05:04] Elbrus: it's just out of my comfort zone and I'd rather not make a mistake that affects other Ubuntu users arising out of my ignorant poking around :D [05:55] Hm. Anyone want to comment on a possible gnome-do FFe? Most of the diff is in adding new upstream icons, and it's now got a gconf schema which'll allow us to have it autostart without popping up on boot. [05:57] There are also some cosmetic fixes, and a bugfix that I'll want to grab reardless. [05:58] Gah. Being upstream's release guy and a MOTU is often cool, but not so much here :) [06:05] Here's a diffstat http://paste2.org/p/82822 [06:09] RAOF: got testing packages anywhere? [06:10] Hobbsee: Not yet. I can run them up easily if you'd like [06:15] RAOF: doesn't look like much of a difference. *shrug* [06:16] RAOF: new icons are good. [06:16] I'm just cutting a tarball and building a testing package for you. [06:23] sweet. === Nicke_ is now known as Nicke [06:34] Hobbsee: http://www.cooperteam.net/gnome-do_0.6.1.0-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb [06:34] RAOF: erm... [06:35] Oh... you'd like one of (a) source package or (b) i386? === jscinoz_ is now known as jscinoz [06:36] Hobbsee: http://www.cooperteam.net/gnome-do_0.6.1.0-0ubuntu1.dsc [06:36] RAOF: i386 [06:37] Hobbsee: Right. I'll just update my i386 builder. [06:37] RAOF: sorry :) [06:38] No problem :) [06:40] * NCommander feels the urge to unleash his inner geek [06:40] NCommander: Review Do, then! [06:42] Whoops. Need some debhelper gconf loving, apparently. [06:44] * NCommander is debating how much he likes the Oxygen icons on revu [06:46] Hobbsee's reviewing? [06:48] ajmitch: i'll try it out :) [06:48] shocking :) [06:50] NCommander: You were after me? [06:50] StevenK, I needed some help uploading things to Debian :-) [06:50] * StevenK goes AFK [06:50] crap [06:50] heh [06:51] ajmitch, there's got to be something in the DPM about running away from work [06:51] ajmitch!! :-) [06:51] siretart! [06:51] how are you? [06:51] I'm doing okay, how are you? [06:52] morning :) [06:52] siretart, I wanted to talk to you about the ghc transition [06:52] good, busy [06:52] same as usual :) [06:52] NCommander: try sistpoty ;) [06:52] same here [06:52] argh [06:52] * NCommander fails [06:52] siretart, so when is people.ubuntuwire.colm returning [06:53] * ajmitch thought that was imbrandon's box [06:53] I've been working on ffmpeg lately, that package is a source of enduring joy I tell you [06:53] * siretart thought that as well [06:53] you might want to ask imbrandon [06:54] ajmitch: I just saw a question regarding authtool on ubuntu-devel, maybe you want to reply there? [06:54] NCommander: I'll upload stuff to Debian if you come to UDS. [06:54] :-P [06:54] StevenK, fine. Get me sponsorship [06:54] * NCommander will fail out of an EMT class to get these things uploaded! [06:54] Haha [06:54] siretart: yeah, it really should have a removal request put in [06:54] StevenK, there is a chance I can make FOSSCamp if I get sponsorship [06:55] StevenK: even I uploaded something for him to debian [06:55] StevenK, he got free FTBFS fixes from me, redeemable in Debian, Ubuntu, Hurd, or Red Hat/CentOS/Fedora [06:55] * ajmitch wonders if he can redeem it with openoffice.org on debian gnu/hurd [06:56] ajmitch, ooooh, that's just wrong. [06:56] ajmitch, Duke Nukem Forever will be released bytime OOo finishs building on Hurd [06:56] it'd keep you busy for a bit [06:57] * StevenK is trying to fix pacemaker [06:57] I managed to fix ksimus. [06:57] ajmitch, actually, we did port it for m68k ... [06:57] o_o; [06:57] Cacao I got working too [06:57] StevenK, whats wrong with pacemaker [06:57] StevenK, what my tip any help? [06:57] s/what/was/g [06:58] NCommander: No, since I'd managed to get it working when you re-surfaced :-P [06:58] sorry ;.; [06:58] pacemaker is FTBFSing, or something worse? [06:58] pacemaker is just packaging stuff [06:59] It's got an outstanding FTBFS bug :-) [07:00] StevenK, I've got a fix for makedumpfile [07:00] care to upload once I finish testbuilding [07:01] To sid or Intrepid? [07:01] intrepid [07:01] I know not to try you for sid uploads :-) [07:02] ajmitch, would you please review codeblocks for me if possible? [07:02] W: makedumpfile source: ancient-standards-version 3.2.0.0 (current is 3.8.0) [07:02] Damn [07:02] This package hasn't been touched in ages [07:02] I want to upload ksimus and pacemaker, but I need to fix pacemaker first [07:02] I have a debdiff ready for you [07:03] * StevenK writes a .install file with the help of dh_install --fail-missing, grep, cut and sed [07:03] That's the way to do it [07:05] nice, gstreamer is broken [07:07] StevenK, can you also reset the build records on some packages on ia64 for me? [07:10] is there a flag to make gzip keep the original file? [07:11] Bah. I was just looking in the wrong place. [07:11] RAOF, for what? [07:12] Hobbsee: http://www.cooperteam.net/gnome-do_0.6.1.0-0ubuntu1_i386.deb [07:12] NCommander: For the gconf schemas the new package installed. [07:12] I wonder if this Do leaks like a sieve [07:12] * StevenK hides from RAOF [07:13] RAOF, you know if anyone is working on the gstream FTBFS? [07:13] StevenK: No, we already fixed that gtk-sharp leak :P [07:13] RAOF: I know, I'm baiting :-) [07:14] How does a mono project leak? [07:14] Isn't C# susposed to have GC? [07:14] Like a sieve [07:14] Yes. But the world is full of useful C libraries. [07:14] In particular, GTK! [07:14] Ew [07:14] StevenK, http://pastebin.ca/1220497 - plz upload :-) [07:15] This Do _also_ won't spontaneously consume a core. [07:15] Haha [07:15] It seems we also want to rebuild monodevelop-boo [07:16] * NCommander needs to annouce his intent to remove gtk1.2 from the archive [07:16] But how will we install xmms! :P [07:16] NCommander: Why are you not calling dh_installman any more? [07:16] but how will we use vmware! [07:17] directhex: Say _what_? [07:17] StevenK, because the makefile installs the manpage into the proper place. dh_installman is more for cases when the package provides a manpage that isn't included by upstream [07:17] (i.e., one you write and include in debian/*) [07:17] RAOF, vmware-agent is the executable you run on a vmware guest to handle things like window-resize-desktop-resize linking. and last i checked, it was linked against gtk1.2 [07:18] StevenK, so I'm creating a 160 task bug in Launchpad :-) [07:18] NCommander: Eeeek! [07:18] NCommander: Bad! [07:18] StevenK, removal of gtk1.2 tracking bug [07:18] I want gtk1.2 dead for jaunty [07:19] steven@liquified:~% apt-cache rdepends libgtk1.2 | wc -l [07:19] 198 [07:19] mcasadevall@blacksteel:~/src$ apt-cache rdepends libgtk1.2 | wc -l [07:19] 160 [07:19] Hrm [07:19] WTF is wrong with your setup :-) [07:20] * StevenK haz Hardyz [07:20] :-) [07:20] I think its a worthwhile goal [07:20] no? [07:21] I think reducing what uses GTK 1.2 is worthwhile, but not removing it [07:21] why not on removing it? [07:22] Because 160 removals/ports is a large amount of work [07:22] so have it span multiple releases [07:22] And its less than 160, since there are about 20 theme packages, 5 for gtk1.2, some packages (e16menueditor for one) that probably can be removed, etc. [07:23] Have you discussed this with seb128? [07:23] And upstream? :-) [07:24] Upstream - Debian? [07:25] No, upstream being GTK upstream [07:25] didn't they stop supporting 1.2 yearsago? [07:26] I'm not sure [07:28] I'll talk to seb128 [07:28] Although I would be curious to see if Launchpad could handle a 160 task bug without grinding to a halt [07:28] can it handle a 16 task bug without grinding to a halt? [07:28] Yup [07:29] * StevenK has played that game [07:29] oh, yeah, no more loki installers for commercial games! :o [07:29] Nooooo [07:29] er [07:29] 160 [07:32] So... no-change rebuilds _just_ add a build1 changelog entry, right? No maintainer mangling, etc? [07:32] Right [07:32] * RAOF uploads monodevelop-boo, then. [07:34] Actually, no. Check for launchpad bugs first! [07:34] There's a bug? [07:34] No, there isn't. [07:34] I was just checking that. [07:35] Obviously no one uses it, or they'd have noticed that it's not installable. [07:38] RAOF, the best types of packages :-P [07:38] StevenK, so makecoredump ... [07:38] * StevenK pushes the upload time back [07:39] * NCommander pushes StevenK a time zone forward [07:39] I'm +11, there isn't much more forward [07:39] Hobbsee: Having gnome-do fun? [07:39] * StevenK refuses to move to New Zealand [07:40] * NCommander reachs down from the sky and drops StevenK somewhere in Washington State [07:40] :-) [07:40] NCommander: dpkg-source: warning: Version number suggests Ubuntu changes, but there is no XSBC-Original-Maintainer field [07:43] StevenK, the maintainer has an @canonical.com email ... [07:44] Ok, strictly speaking the policy says ubuntu.com ... [07:45] StevenK, I assume you want me to fix it [07:49] StevenK: you know you want to move to NZ... [07:50] StevenK, I need to run for a few minutes, bbiab [07:54] NCommander: Nah, I can deal [08:05] NCommander: makedumpfile uploaded === ivoks_ is now known as ivoks === Tallken_ is now known as Tallken [08:44] Thank you StevenK [08:54] StevenK, question; is it possible to retroactively promote something to main to resolve a bug in a released version? [08:55] NCommander: Certainly [08:56] NCommander: Requires an MIR and approval from ubuntu-mir [08:56] StevenK, I think it was bumped in a later release to main [08:56] NCommander: that's the contrary (xubuntu was demoted to universe) [08:57] mr_pouit, but xubuntu was in main dapper/feisty/gutsy [08:57] yep [08:57] * NCommander beats his head on his desk [08:58] can you recommend something in universe from main? [08:58] (I figure thats the next best alternative since it strictly speaking isn't a depends [08:58] no [08:58] suggests only, and no build-deps [08:58] Figured as much === not_rly is now known as orly_owl === m-y-t-h-o-s is now known as mythos === m-y-t-h-o-s is now known as mythos === m-y-t-h-o-s is now known as mythos [10:46] RAOF: works nicely. Nice icons. === nm-rocker is now known as asac === not_rly is now known as orly_owl_ [12:06] is DKMS something like module-assistant ? [12:07] yes, but automagic [12:07] i.e. no manual m-a a-i required on kernel updates [12:08] ok, what should change in my package to support DKMS ? and is DKMS going to be used in Debian ? === orly_owl_ is now known as orly_owl [12:10] AnAnt, http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=481590 [12:10] Debian bug 481590 in wnpp "ITP: dkms -- Dynamic Kernel Module Support framework" [Wishlist,Open] [12:11] that means, not yet [12:12] anyways, what should change in my package to support DKMS ? [12:41] would anyone be willing to sponsor system-cleaner 1.10 from http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?package=system-cleaner ? it fixes fairly severe problems (wrong packages being removed, crashes in some circumstances) === rulus_ is now known as rulus [14:10] I'm looking at bug 242572, it looks like a bug fix version, but the upstream changelog is very terse [14:10] Launchpad bug 242572 in wxsvg "Upgrade wxsvg package to b11" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/242572 [14:10] it builds fine, but there are no rdepends to test with === ogra_ is now known as ogra [14:11] anyone want to back me up in uploading, or suggest an alternative course of action [14:11] ? === ivoks_ is now known as ivoks [14:31] ScottK, it may just be me but the backport of pidgin seems to disconnect MSN when people add you to their contact list :P [14:40] cody-somerville: Talk to jdong. I didn't do that one (I don't think). [14:41] Hi [14:42] Someone is asking in my LoCo's ML if it's possible to specify a fallback mirror in /etc/apt/sources.list... Is it? [14:47] RainCT: Can't you just point at two mirrors and the highest version number available will get downloaded? [14:47] I think that accomplishes that use case. [14:48] Won't apt fall through to any other mirrors with the same version? [14:49] RainCT: What do you eman by fallback mirror? [14:51] RainCT: I have IITM (IIT Madras) mirror in my sources.list as well as archive.ubuntu.com. Any package which is not available at IITM mirror is pulled from a.u.c. [14:53] Heya gang [14:54] superm1: are you planning to put bluez 4.11 in PPA? [14:54] hoi bddebian [14:55] superm1: and when are we actually planning to bribe the release team to approve the exception? :-P [14:55] Hello sebner [14:59] slytherin, it's in the ppa.... [14:59] superm1: Ok. I didn't check today [15:00] slytherin, along with bluez gnome 1.8 [15:01] superm1: I don't know how much difference it is going to make for me. But still I will test it. What about the plan to actually get it into intrepid? [15:02] slytherin, that will be up to slangasek [15:02] bribe early and often [15:02] slytherin, i personally think the packages are in pretty good order and a significant improvement, etc. [15:04] superm1: Yes, in my opinion 3.x has many blues. So upgrading to 4.x is preferred provides it doesn't create more problems. === white_ is now known as white [15:30] ScottK, wgrant, slytherin: OK, thanks. I wasn't sure if just listing two would work. (I didn't answer before because I'm at school right now :P) [15:31] slytherin, did you get a chance over the weekend to look at a possibly tooltip patch? [15:32] 15 [15:32] superm1: nah, I was in office on Saturday also and sleeping most of the day Sunday. :-) === LucidFox_ is now known as LucidFox [15:50] anyone running Intrepid have 5 minutes to test something for me? [15:51] james_w: /me [15:51] install xournal and try drawing with a mouse/trackpad [15:51] thanks sebner [15:51] ensure "Use XInput" is turned on in the menu [15:51] james_w: kk [15:52] works fine [15:52] james_w: yep, fine [15:54] just my system then it seems [15:54] thanks, I'll upload [16:03] if any one is interested in testing infrastructure, cr3 is giving now a session at #ubuntu-classroom [16:52] hi folks [16:57] huhu sistpoty|work :) [16:58] hi sebner [17:10] sistpoty|work: how is life going? :) [17:11] sebner: quite good, and for you? === x-spec-t is now known as Spec [17:11] sistpoty|work: now making 3 months of vacation :P [17:11] sebner: wow, I envy you :P [17:12] sistpoty|work: not if I tell you what I have to make after vacation :P [17:12] heh === x-spec-t is now known as Spec [17:22] * sistpoty|work heads home... cya [17:30] james_w: great work on xournal, thank you :) [17:31] lucas: no problem [17:31] lucas: did you get hit by the flood? [17:31] james_w: btw, what now about wordpress? [17:31] yup, I'm PTS-subscribed [17:31] sebner: I didn't see your updated patch [17:32] james_w: because there is nothing to update. the fix we were talking about is in the actual debian version we merge [17:33] james_w: some days I alrady told that to you. maybe you missed it [17:33] sebner: your merge included 2 security fixes, and one fix for a problem introduced by the first fix. [17:34] A different bug about the first security fix was marked "Won't Fix" [17:34] so either that was wrong and we want that fix, or we want to cherry-pick the second security fix [17:34] Hi [17:35] james_w: we didn't want it but as Debian now has it we get it automatically and it doesn't hurt us I think [17:37] sebner: yes, but in https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wordpress/+bug/269301/comments/3 it is suggested that we don't want the fix anyway [17:37] Launchpad bug 269301 in wordpress "[CVE-2008-3747] - wordpress before 2.6.1 ssl problem might allow remote attackers to gain administrative access by sniffing the network for a cookie" [Undecided,Won't fix] [17:37] what do you think? [17:38] james_w: I think we just didn't want it apply manuelly but as now debian has the fix I think it's no problem to merge it [17:39] sebner: that's not how I read it, and the debdiff in that bug actually references the Debian upload, suggesting it was made after the fix was uploaded to Debian [17:40] james_w: well as I understand we backport ssl and fix it. or we don't backport ssl and wait until wordpress 2.6 which has ssl per default and fixed [17:47] sebner: ok, please prepare an upload with just the latest security fix, leaving out the SSL stuff [17:47] sebner: and update the merge bug accordingly please [17:47] james_w: ai ai, Sir [17:48] wait [17:48] it's Ay Ay [17:48] xD [17:58] james_w: but for a better review I merge the acutal version und just disable the ssl fix. Seems a little bit easier and faster to me. Hope that's ok for you since you'll sponsor it [17:59] make sure the changelog doesn't list the versions you didn't merge, and the version number is just an ubuntuX update from the current Intrepid version [17:59] otherwise MoM may do the wrong thing [18:00] other than that I don't mind how you get to the final diff :-) [18:00] james_w: I'm wondering what speaks against a -8ubuntu1 version [18:01] it could work I guess [18:02] sure [18:02] james_w: bug #277267 [18:02] Launchpad bug 277267 in wordpress "Merge wordpress 2.5.1-8 from Debian(Unstable)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/277267 [18:02] I'd prefer not to though [18:02] bah :P [18:02] also because merges are harder to sponsor :-) [18:03] are merges still going on? [18:03] james_w: no excuses. you are a MOTU and I want to become one (next month) :) [18:03] RoAkSoAx: sure, BUGfixing :P [18:04] sebner, so i can still do merges to fix bugs? [18:04] RoAkSoAx: sure [18:04] RoAkSoAx: of course [18:04] why didn't i know that before... lol :P xD [18:04] RoAkSoAx: a merge of just about anything from Debian testing will be worthwhile [18:04] RoAkSoAx: but new upstream versions aren't that often bufixes :P [18:04] well, not just about anything, but many things [18:05] james_w: mind sponsoring more of my future work to be able to comment on my application? [18:05] sebner: stick it in the queue, and if it's good I'll sponsor it :-) [18:05] so should i just look for a package that needs to be bugfixed and then see in debian and merge it? [18:05] sebner: anything else currently in the queue that is waiting for a sponsor? [18:06] james_w: unfortunately not. that's why I said "future work" [18:06] RoAkSoAx: you could look at MoM, and look at the changes in Debian and see if we want them [18:06] RoAkSoAx: qa.ubuntuwire.com/rcbugs [18:06] RoAkSoAx: BUT, you need a FFe anyway [18:06] sebner: fix more bugs :-p [18:06] RoAkSoAx: and the merge need to be a Bug fixing update [18:07] james_w: I will :P [18:07] nxvl: not for bugfix only merges [18:07] oh ok cool, thnks guys :) [18:07] james_w: so, interested to comment? [18:07] james_w: well, is there any? :P [18:07] sebner: I don't think I've sponsored enough yet, sorry. [18:07] nxvl: Debian is frozen too, so I would hope so. [18:08] james_w: but lenny is freezed [18:08] james_w: I told about future work. so if I'll fix more stuff and you can review it and THEN you maybe want to comment? [18:08] i'm still uploading to sid [18:08] nxvl: I don't mind about experimental too :P [18:09] sebner: sure, I'll comment if I sponsor enough. [18:09] Hi * [18:09] james_w: cool, thx ;) [18:09] huhu geser :D [18:09] Hi sebner [18:09]