=== mwhudson_ is now known as mwhudson [04:00] #startmeeting [04:00] Meeting started at 05:00. The chair is barry. [04:00] Commands Available: [TOPIC], [IDEA], [ACTION], [AGREED], [LINK], [VOTE] [04:01] hi everybody and welcome to this week's asiapac reviewer's meeting. who's here today? [04:01] good grief [04:01] i am here [04:01] jeebus, i'm going to bed [04:01] jml, thumper, spiv [04:02] thumper told me he might not make it [04:02] so mwhudson how the hell are ya? [04:02] i think the other two should be around [04:02] barry: i am ok! [04:02] :) [04:02] slogging away at code imports for the most part [04:02] barry: how are you? [04:03] getting over being sick for a week :( [04:03] :( [04:03] jamesh: hi! [04:03] hi [04:03] we can wait a minute or so to see if jml and spiv show up [04:05] sinzui, ol' eastern timezone buddy, ol' pal [04:05] [TOPIC] agenda [04:05] New Topic: agenda [04:05] * Roll call [04:05] * Next meeting [04:05] * Action items [04:05] * Queue status [04:05] * Mentoring update [04:05] * Review process [04:06] [TOPIC] next meeting [04:06] New Topic: next meeting [04:06] same time and place? [04:06] back [04:06] yes [04:06] jml: hi [04:06] sorry, dst confusion [04:07] no worries [04:07] okay. same time and place next week [04:07] [TOPIC] action items [04:07] New Topic: action items [04:07] * (continued) thumper to report on pending-reviews killer in LP [04:07] i guess we'll just continue this one on since thumper's not here [04:07] [TOPIC] queue status [04:07] New Topic: queue status [04:08] actually, this is likely to be a bad time for thumper. [04:08] I'll ask him about timing preferences after the meeting. [04:08] back to queue status. [04:08] jml: please do. i'm happy to move it one hour earlier, but probably don't want to go much later [04:09] *nod* [04:09] queue looks fine to me. still have one of stub's long running test branches [04:09] not much in PR [04:09] I'll get to that. [04:09] jamesh: cool, thanks [04:09] jamesh: looks like it has a conflict [04:10] any feedback on the queue from you guys? [04:10] barry: it is in .bzrignore, so doesn't obscure the meat of the branch. [04:10] jml: i reviewed your branch. i'm really sorry it took so long to get that reviewed [04:11] jamesh: cool [04:11] barry: np. thanks for the review, I'll aim to reply today. [04:11] pff! [04:11] jml: k [04:11] anything else? [04:11] nope. [04:12] [TOPIC] mentoring update [04:12] New Topic: mentoring update [04:12] probably not much to say there, eh? [04:12] nope [04:12] [TOPIC] review process [04:12] New Topic: review process [04:12] anything on your minds about that? [04:13] umm. [04:13] jml: go ahead! [04:13] umm. [04:14] more automation is good [04:14] but we are already working on that as #1 priority [04:14] jml: reviews in lp? [04:14] it'd be cool if Launchpad kept track of this stuff [04:14] oh, I remember [04:14] barry, jamesh: yes [04:15] barry: stub was surprised when I asked him about whether he had sent a review letter to the reviews list asking for a review [04:15] barry: he had just added a thing to the wiki page in my queue [04:15] abel was working in lala land too [04:15] barry: so, we probably need clearer docs on the PendingReviews page [04:15] did he arrange that with you ahead of time? [04:16] barry: he might have. I can't recall. [04:16] jml: i don't think anybody should drop a branch in your pr queue without arranging so irst [04:16] er, first [04:16] barry: but I think I would have assumed, even we did arrange, that I was waiting for a cover letter. [04:16] jml: yes, always cover letter to list (via bzr review-submit) [04:16] barry: those details are lost in the mists of time [04:17] anyway, we need clearer docs about review-submit and cover letters etc on PendingReviews, I think. [04:17] [ACTION] barry to update PendingReviews with clearer docs on process [04:17] ACTION received: barry to update PendingReviews with clearer docs on process [04:17] cool :) [04:17] :) [04:17] that's it. [04:17] cool. that's it for me then. is there anything else you guys want to bring up, or communicate to ameu? [04:17] mwhudson: having fun? [04:17] this is a little bit annoying [04:17] jml: no, not really [04:18] barry: keep the dream alive. [04:18] barry: that's all I have to say :) [04:18] mwhudson: i'm not leaving here until you have at least 5 underscores in your nick [04:18] jml: always! :) [04:18] barry: shouldn't take too long [04:18] okie dokie then. === barry is now known as barry_____ [04:18] #endmeeting === barry_____ is now known as barry [04:19] thanks everyone! [04:19] perhaps "__barry__" [04:19] did that #endmeeting take? :) [04:19] jml: working on that for py3k [04:19] #endmeeting [04:19] Meeting finished at 05:19. [04:19] :) [04:19] :) [04:19] barry: I guess that'll override the diamond operator? [04:19] jml: sshhhh!!!!!!!! don't tell guido! [04:19] barry: __barry__ is the special method for grouching about there not being an "<>" operator any more? [04:19] jml: high five! [04:20] mwhudson: from future import __barry__ [04:20] 1 __barry__ 2 [04:20] from past import __barry__ [04:20] jamesh: yes, exactly :) [04:20] ok. i'm going to bed now. g'nite [04:20] bye === barry is now known as barry-away [04:21] maybe python 3k should have a "greater than or less than" operator to replace the deprecated "less than or greater than" operator [04:21] ha ha [04:33] er, hi === mwhudson__ is now known as mwhudson === mrevell is now known as mrevell-lunch === mwhudson__ is now known as mwhudson === mrevell-lunch is now known as mrevell === gmb is now known as myrios === myrios is now known as gmb_ === gmb_ is now known as gmb === salgado is now known as salgado-lunch === salgado-lunch is now known as salgado === mwhudson_ is now known as mwhudson === salgado is now known as salgado-afk