=== TheMuso_ is now known as TheMuso [00:59] superm1: negligibly more latency than direct/raw (hw:0), but that's not the primary concern - introducing the regression of inaudible audio for a significant use case (non-Free Flash) is unacceptable by default for an LTS. [01:07] crimsun: Any thoughts on the dnsoop issue reported? [01:07] dsnoop === Syntux is now known as Syntux[sleeping] === jamesh_ is now known as jamesh [02:34] TheMuso: it's likely because his usb speakers don't expose any capture; I asked for verification. We can wrap the module-alsa-* portion in .nofail if that's the case. [02:34] crimsun: Right. === kitterma is now known as ScottK2 === Yasumoto_ is now known as Yasumoto === TheMuso_ is now known as TheMuso === Whoopie_ is now known as Whoopie [05:10] if the section needs to be overridden just for a single binary package compared to what it is now, should I do an upload to change this, or is that ignored and an archive admin needs to override the section? [05:10] i thought it was the latter, but wanted to make sure [05:10] Both [05:11] The latter usually happens first [05:13] so at this stage in the game, maybe do an upload that fixes it, subscribe ubuntu-archive and ask for it to be properly overridden when it's released? [06:11] good morning [06:17] hello. i'm wondering about Bug 212546. this seems like something that'll be universally annoying to people (change in behavior from gutsy) [06:17] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pidgin/+bug/212546 [06:17] Launchpad bug 212546 in pidgin "pidgin no longer flashes/notifies on taskbar upon receipt of message" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/212546 [06:17] Launchpad bug 212546 in pidgin "pidgin no longer flashes/notifies on taskbar upon receipt of message" [Undecided,New] [06:44] Good morning === asac_ is now known as asac [06:45] Morning pitti [06:46] Good morning [06:47] hey StevenK, moin warp10 [06:47] hey pitti! [06:55] Guten Morgen pitti === hunger_t is now known as hunger [08:22] pitti, hi [08:22] hi all [08:26] hi all [08:27] are there any plans to update language-packs before final release ? === Syntux_ is now known as Syntux [08:47] hi tkamppeter [08:47] hey geser [09:05] Riddell: can you please have a quick look at bug 60448? [09:05] Launchpad bug 60448 in xorg ".xsession_errors file grows out of control & saturates disk space" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/60448 [09:07] is there a bug with grub on preseed? [09:08] or a change in the installer between beta and RC ? [09:16] pitti: maybe you could tell me if there are any plans to update language-packs before final release? [09:16] <\sh> Silicium, what doesn't work? [09:17] grub install [09:17] mantiena: again? They were just updated over the weekend [09:17] mantiena: so, no; those are the final packs [09:17] i have commented out the grub lines in preseed and test again [09:17] mantiena: we have plenty of time to update them post-release [09:18] pitti: you are not right, language packs aren't updated in this weeked, latest language-packs-gnome are 20080415 :( [09:18] mantiena: right, that's the latest export that LP provides [09:18] mantiena: exported on April 15, langpacks built on April 18, uploaded on April 19 [09:19] mantiena: I meant that they were built on the buildds over the weekend [09:24] argh [09:24] grub cannot install in /target/ [09:24] lets debug :/ [09:25] OH [09:25] there is a new feature :) [09:25] publish debug logs [09:25] o/ [09:26] pitti, so, you are misleading translators :( [09:26] pitti: LanguagePackTranslationDeadline date is April 17 at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/HardyReleaseSchedule [09:27] our team did lots of hard work in April 16 - April 17 [09:27] mantiena: the confusion seems to be that translators think that they can update strings until April 17, but from the distro side we need to have the packages ready in the archive at this date [09:28] but we have some 5 days turnaround time for that [09:28] pitti: is it so hard to update language packs now ? [09:28] mantiena: well, it isn't lost, we'll update translations maybe two weeks after hardy's release [09:28] mantiena: as I said, a complete turnaround takes 5 days; next LP export is available Thursday morning, and building/uploading/buildd'ing the packs takes another 2 [09:29] so it's not hard, it's impossible [09:29] hmm [09:29] looks like a pkgsel problem [09:29] mantiena: we should really clarify that in the wiki docs, I agree [09:29] Silicium: might be better in #ubuntu-installer [09:29] yea [09:39] pitti, I have done a small fix in foomatic-rip on Ricoh's request, bug 129999 [09:39] Launchpad bug 129999 in gasp-code "Bad things happen when setting the background color in begin_graphics()" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/129999 [09:39] tkamppeter: I saw it; IMHO that should go into -updates, though (SRU) [09:39] Sorry, bug 219999 [09:39] Launchpad bug 219999 in foomatic-filters "foomatic-rip does not handle enumerated-choice options with choices "True" and "False" correctly, leading to Duplex on most Ricoh printers not working" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/219999 [09:41] pitti, what about the crasher fixes on s-c-p of last week? Will they go into Hardy or are there also an SRU? [09:42] tkamppeter: those were uploaded earlier, they might make it [09:45] pitti: I've uploaded a gedit-plugins new version on the upstream request (the current version was setting an incorrect translation domain and breaking some gedit translations when installed), the package is in universe and I'm granting the GNOME exceptions there, so please accept the update ;-) [09:45] seb128: yessir [09:46] * seb128 hugs pitti [09:46] danke ;-) [09:47] seb128: done [09:51] pitti, it's a pitty if there are no way to include our work in final release :( about 7-8 people traslated lots of strings from our team, I see simmilar situation in other teams too, look for example at https://translations.launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+source/firefox-3.0/+pots/firefox - about ~20 teams improved firefox translation after April 15 [09:53] mantiena: it will be in -updates, and in the point release, too [09:54] yea, I understand this, but we though, that we are in time to have good translations in 8.04 release :) [09:54] moral of the story, keep an eye on the release cycle dates! [09:54] highvoltage: hehe, we followed official ReleaseShedule [09:54] highvoltage: they did, the schedule is not clear [09:55] <\sh> Silicium, -server daily from yesterday worked like a charm...(standard install) [09:55] seb128: ah, I see [10:01] seb128: maybe I can simply add note, that real translation deadline is 2 days before LanguagePackTranslationDeadline in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/IntrepidReleaseSchedule ? Also it would be wise to fix UbuntuReleaseSchedule template, if there are such [10:01] mantiena: better to speak to slangasek or pitti rather and let them do the required changes [10:01] right [10:03] pitti: so, you will change https://wiki.ubuntu.com/IntrepidReleaseSchedule by yourself ? [10:03] I clarified it on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LanguagePackTranslationDeadline [10:06] pitti: I think it's not enough to clarify this on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LanguagePackTranslationDeadline - lots of translators already have read https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LanguagePackTranslationDeadline and they will look only on ReleaseSchedule [10:06] I think it's not hard to add small note [10:06] in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/IntrepidReleaseSchedule [10:06] what are those empty squares you are outputing? [10:07] stgraber: are you going to update iso.qa.ubuntu.com with new ISOs? :) [10:07] dholbach is iso testing addict now ;-) [10:07] ln-: I don't see any squares :( [10:08] seb128: hardly ;) [10:08] mantiena: You're using Pidgin? [10:08] mantiena: what are those things in the begin of your line, before my nick? [10:08] mantiena: done [10:08] dholbach: iso will changes again no? is there a point to do a round of testing on the current ones? [10:09] seb128: 20080421 fixed a bug I found in an earlier ISO ;) [10:10] pitti: thanks [10:11] Fujitsu: yes, I don't found any other IRC client in Ubuntu 8.04 LiveCD [10:11] s/don't/didn't/ [10:12] Right, that'll probably be Pidgin trying to tell us he's typing a message. [10:13] ... ... .... well that's exactly what i wanted someone else's Pidgin to tell me. [10:14] sounds extremely stupid behavior. [10:14] ln-: Right, it's stupid for IRC. Other Pidgin users that I've seen have trailing inverted Is, rather than leading spaces. [10:14] * laga doesn't see it in irssi [10:15] It doesn't happen for many. [10:15] Must be some strange plugin. [10:15] it appears the character is "ZERO WIDTH NO-BREAK SPACE", so depending on the font it may show as... zero-width space. [10:15] Aha. [10:15] maybe pidgin can become the new MS comic chat? :) [10:16] and apparently the font i'm using doesn't have that character. [10:16] laga: It's about as comical and ridiculous. === msy_ is now known as Scott_Ma === Scott_Ma is now known as msy === msy is now known as Scott_Ma === Scott_Ma is now known as msy === msy is now known as msy_ === msy_ is now known as Scott_Ma [11:22] dholbach: the release managers usually add the ISOs as they build them :) [11:33] ogra: ok, i recovered from the work-grave and could do classmate image testing now. appreciated? [11:56] asac: "grave"? I hope you mean "rave"? :-) [11:57] :) [11:57] yeah ... indeed it was a rave in the grave ;) [12:19] stgraber: ahhh ok :) [12:29] 2002 era fashions: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7358483.stm [12:36] tkamppeter: meh, spoke to soon [12:36] tkamppeter: even after removing the firmware, I get about 1-2 prints before the printer fails [12:41] pitti: you are here? [12:41] * pitti jumps over to "there" [12:41] :) [12:42] i have a problem installing pgsql in preseed [12:42] so then i have created a post install script running while preseed [12:42] asac, absolutely [12:42] the setup is sucessfully [12:43] but another pakage using the pgsql as depency does not correcly install [12:43] cause cant connect to the database [12:44] Silicium: so you have a cluster created? (check with pg_lsclusters) [12:44] cjwatson saays you are the maintainer of pgsql so i ask you [12:44] nope [12:44] so i have a syslog from preseed [12:44] Silicium: hm, then it obviously didn't work [12:44] Silicium: do you see anything like "/dev/null: permission denied" in the log? that's one common reason of failure which i saw in hardy [12:44] nope [12:45] Silicium: hm, can you show me the log? does it have the package installation output? [12:45] see query for the debug url [12:46] Silicium: I didn't get a /query; you need to be registered to send /querys on freenode [12:46] oh [12:46] (at least to other registered people) [12:46] mom [12:47] i kno [12:47] i know [12:47] now you get a qry :) [12:49] so is partially german, if needed i can re run the setup in english [12:49] Silicium: did you get my response? [12:49] nope [12:49] oh argh; seems I haven't been registered either since my server rebooted, sorry [12:50] :) [12:50] np [12:50] same here [12:50] *blush* [12:53] * Hobbsee waves [13:06] ogra: throw instructions at me then [13:06] asac, well, install it, use it :) [13:06] test susend/resume [13:07] ogra: throw instructions at me :) [13:07] i forgot the procedure [13:07] sorry [13:08] asac, install you mean ? they are at the top on http://people.ubuntu.com/~ogra/classmate/images/8.04/ [13:09] ogra: ok, will test after lunch (~1h from now) [13:11] teake your time :) [13:17] ogra: ugh, devilspie?? [13:17] ogra: LTSP installs unsupported packages by default, hmmm [13:17] ogra: there is no bug # in the ltsp changelog, so hard for me to judge approval [13:18] pitti, --kisok is by no means used by default, promoted or anything else :) [13:18] its an extra plugin you need to specify [13:19] pitti, same as the mythbuntu plugin, just seeit as universe part of ltsp :) it doesnt install any deps if you dont attempt to create a dedicated kiosk chroot [13:20] pitti, and its for a regression in that plugin that has no bug number ... just a nice to have (else firefox will run windowed on kiosk systems) [13:21] ogra: ok, thanks [13:21] that's interesting. === mvo_ is now known as mvo [13:40] bryce: what would be the best place (package?) to add custom config options to xorg.conf? [14:29] is a line "Build-Depends: foo | bar, baz" acceptable? [14:30] As long a foo is a real package and not a virtual package, yes. [14:31] I am trying to add a Build-Depends: for lyx-qt|lyx [14:31] Should be fine then. [14:31] (that package changed name from dapper to hardy) [14:32] Which is the hary one? [14:32] ScottK: it's complaining that the package is not found.. [14:32] hary/hardy [14:32] lyx [14:32] asac: After seeing the latest feedback on bug 192888, I'm not at all willing to upload that change. [14:32] Launchpad bug 192888 in libflashsupport "firefox crashes on flash contents" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/192888 [14:35] alex_joni: I'm not sure. I'd expect that to work. Packaging questions are generally better asked on #ubuntu-motu. [14:35] ScottK: cool, will move to there [14:35] sbuild will chose the first of an or'ed dependency [14:35] if you're targetting the package at hardy, use the hardy name first [14:36] alex_joni: ^^^ [14:36] elmo: it's targeted at both hardy & dapper [14:36] dapper likes lyx-qt, hardy lyx [14:36] ok, then I'll work around this === ryu2 is now known as ryu [14:39] TheMuso: yes, I agree its too risky to take for final .. we should try hard to fix this for 8.04.1 [14:39] asac: Agreed. [14:40] who knows probably someone comes up wit a fix to libflashsupport in the meantime and the prob is moot :) [14:41] TheMuso: milestoned for 8.04.1 [14:41] ogra: i am pretty sure that nobody can fix libflashsupport :) [14:41] asac, someone will [14:42] fedora uses it all over the place [14:42] ogra: well. good for us ... they are insane then ;) [14:42] well, that means someone will try to fix it at least :) [14:42] ogra: libflashsupport implements a contract from years ago ... who knows maybe they completely miss to implement some symbol [14:43] i dont care about their sanity :) [14:43] Well, even NTFS is writable these days... /me shrugs [14:43] they use nspluginwrapper everywhere though [14:43] ogra: after release we will talk to adobe to sort this out. the real solution is to use ESD [14:43] so the problem wont be exposed as much [14:43] ogra: right ... that fixes the crashes of firefox, but flash crashes anyway :) [14:43] haha [14:44] but yes, we should use nspluginwrapper as well. [14:44] thats sane ;) [14:45] well, it points the user to the acual problem ... [14:45] indeed [14:46] the real problam is that you blow libflashssupport into adobes house :) [14:46] so the problem is libflashsupport :) [14:46] hich is wrong as well, since its pulse code now ... but they get warare of it at least [14:46] heh [14:46] *aware [14:47] yeah [14:49] where's the process for getting something into hardy at this point? [14:49] I doubt there IS one [14:49] cr3: new package? [14:49] its going to be released in days [14:49] Hobbsee: just an update [14:49] Hobbsee: patch even [14:49] cr3: does it fix a release critical bug? [14:49] or is it otherwise very very important? [14:50] Hobbsee: I'm not sure what constitutes "release critical bug". is fixing a bug from people saying "Wow! This pisses me off!" and "I don't tolerate this kind of !@#$" release critical? [14:50] cr3: depends. bug #? [14:55] cr3: what is the issue exactly? [14:55] Hobbsee: bug #201336 [14:55] Launchpad bug 201336 in hwtest "report contains package information" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/201336 [14:56] seb128: personal information such as packages and versions are being submitted without the knowledge of the enduser [14:56] seb128: so, I have simply added a summary page before submission to at least inform the user about this [14:57] cr3: is the packages list something really required? [14:57] seb128: according to the launchpad folks responsible for the hardware database, yes [14:58] seb128, that info shall be made available to you as bug triager t some point (if teh user allows this) ... would you like to have that info ? [14:58] cr3: if you add a non translated dialog nows there is some users who will get angry [14:58] ogra: no, apport already has those informations [14:58] seb128: between having something done behind the user's back and having not translated, what do you think might be more important? [14:58] users will be able to link their hwtest info to bug reports in the future ... [14:58] cr3: I would remove the "include packages informations" rather [14:59] with a simple checkbox [14:59] to be honest I don't think hwtest is really ready to be used but that's an another topic [14:59] my preferred choices would be [14:59] - don't include those informations [14:59] - show a summary [14:59] - do nothing [14:59] but I'm not the one deciding there [14:59] you want to talk to slangasek or pitti [15:00] do nothing as in "leave as is" ? [15:00] ogra: yes [15:00] seb128: that's in order of preference, right? I actually tried to negotiate your #1 with the LP folks, specifically, I suggested having a checkbox to give the choice to the enduser whether they want to send package information or not. However, the LP folks said that information was required and I believe their relaxng schema enforces it anyhow. [15:00] it doesn't sound RC, if anything it sounds like something that can be fixed in an SRU. [15:01] cr3: yes [15:01] Mithrandir: if you guys say so, I'll go with it. just wanted to bring this to your attention :) [15:01] we should just not use hwtest in 8.04, fix it and use it in 8.04.1 [15:02] it currently sends useful information though, that'd be unfortunate :( [15:02] we have a similar application for years, I'm not convinced it does anything useful so far [15:03] and the thing really lacks a maintainer [15:03] almost all the bugs are untouched on launchpad apparently [15:03] * TheMuso sighs. Users wanting us to ship paviewcontrol. [15:03] * TheMuso can't remember why we chose not to... [15:05] seb128, but hwtest has a maintainer (a whole team even) i dont think hwtest now is worse than hwdb ever was, its an improvement in any case [15:05] ogra: maybe they should start looking at bugs then ;-) [15:06] heh [15:06] rather at the schedule :) [15:07] its not easy to grasp and know when you can do what if you dont work with it regulary [15:07] seb128: point well taken, I should be more regular in my bug triaging :( [15:07] cr3: anyway better to ask pitti or slangasek about it when they will be around still, better to avoid bad comments from some users because we didn't consider the bug === emu_ is now known as emu [15:08] seb128: yeah, I'm fine either way with their decision. thanks for the advice and for the kick in the butt about checking my bugs :) [15:09] cr3: that's alright, I just noticed that this issue has been reported some weeks ago, and it would have been easier to deal with it before the freeze, but everybody has lot to do, etc so it's easy to be behind on triage [15:10] seb128: hwtest is more of a personal project and I work on it mostly evenings. however, these days, I've even been doing my usual work evenings. this will get better soon :) [15:12] cr3: alright ;-) The comment was not against you, but since we ship it by default we should have somebody in the team looking at the issue, you don't have to be this somebody ;-) [15:14] seb128: heh, don't worry, this project is something that is close to my heart so I actually enjoy the opportunity of maintaining it. I also appreciate the privilege of having such user feedback, it's always good to hear from folks even if it's to complain :) [15:15] cr3: btw in case you didn't notice I did the category change we talked about in hardy [15:17] seb128: yeah, your revision update kinda surprised me, I already had an update poised for hardy with the category: GTK;System;Settings; [15:18] hi cr3; what's up? [15:20] pitti: just wanted to bring your attention to bug #201336 for hwtest in which a user says: "Wow! This pisses me off!" and "I don't tolerate this kind of !@#$". I have a fix for this where I simply display a summary of the information about to be submitted. [15:20] cr3: you were not on IRC and the change was really needed [15:20] Launchpad bug 201336 in hwtest "report contains package information" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/201336 [15:20] could a buildd admin give back lvm2 on powerpc please? It was hit by the ntpdate problem on saturday, and hasn't been kicked yet. https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lvm2/2.02.26-1ubuntu9/+build/566009 [15:20] seb128: agreed, thanks for that :) [15:21] james_w: done [15:22] thanks elmo [15:22] pitti: if you don't think that's critical, I'm fine with submitting an update after the release. if you think this could make it before release, I think this would be appreciate by some folks. [15:23] cr3: that sounds like a feature freeze/UI freeze/string freeze exception? [15:24] pitti: UI freeze, it was more than just a string change [15:25] cr3: yes, I mean all of those [15:25] but there was no additional windows and the user experience is exactly the same, except that the user won't get so pissed off :) [15:25] pitti: heh, I thought it was a question :) [15:26] pitti: I don't want you to spend too much time on this unless you think it's worthwhile, we're all crazy busy nearing release. do you think 8.04 or 8.04.1? [15:27] cr3: my gut feeling is .1 to not rush this in and break things; a package list isn't that private, is it? at least not more than your hardware/system identification? [15:28] cr3: but displaying the report before makes sense indeed; it's just very late for that :/ [15:28] pitti: if I know you're running a kernel with an exploit because you haven't done updates, that could present a problem :) [15:30] pitti: it's a very simple report, no details at all: The following information will be sent [blah blah]. Distribution details, Device information, Processor information, Packages installed, Test results. [15:31] cr3: can you please ping someone from the doc team about it, whether it's ok for them to change this right now? [15:31] pitti: a more detailed report would've required major work which I wouldn't dare submit for an exception. [15:32] pitti: where would I do that? #ubuntu-doc? :) [15:32] cr3: ah, I see; if the doc team is fine with it (maybe because they did not document hwtest at all), then we should consider it [15:33] lol [15:33] cr3: http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-doc is the ML [15:33] ops wrong window. [15:34] cr3: yes, IRC is fine as well, if you can catch someone [15:37] pitti: just to make sure I understand, if ubuntu-doc documents the shortcoming of hwtest then that'll be fine. otherwise, we should consider the bugfix in hwtest. is that right? [15:38] cr3: I mean if ubuntu-doc is fine with making that change now; i. e. it won't break documentation (or they'll update it) [15:38] I think it's late for this cycle [15:38] pitti: ah, thanks for the clarification. much appreciated :) [15:39] you will break translations in any case [15:39] yeah :/ [15:46] ogra: just curious, why does ltspfs have debian/patches/? isn't ltsp maintained upstream in bzr? [15:48] pitti, yes, but not the packaging [15:48] and we're in deepfreeze, i dont introduce new upstream versions :) [15:48] ogra: oh, surprising [15:48] ogra: that's fine :) [15:49] ogra: ok classmate image is booting ... lets see [15:49] with hardy i pulled debians package for the first time, i think vagrant just wanted to be polite and added dpatch [15:49] ogra: ill use german install? [15:50] or plain english for now? [15:52] as you like [15:57] ogra: ping regarding team ppa for cmpc [15:57] amitk, what team should that be ? [15:58] ogra: do you already have a cmpc team in launchpad? [15:59] nope, but i need one anyway to put the cmpc packages under as upstream [16:00] amitk, i meant how do you wat the ACL to look like :) [16:00] *want [16:04] amitk, ok, i got a general cmpc-developers team https://launchpad.net/~cmpc-developers [16:08] * ogra hugs pitti [16:08] pitti, bug 220041 is a one-line-fix, can we still get this into Hardy? [16:08] Launchpad bug 220041 in system-config-printer "CUPS Printer Setup dialog deceiving" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/220041 [16:10] ogra: classmate image is broken for me [16:10] ogra: after install i get UUID= ... and are asked to enter maintenance shell [16:10] asac, in what way ? [16:10] ugh [16:11] fsck.ext3 ... unable to resolve 'UUID=' [16:11] ogra: I applied for membership. Could you also activate the PPA for this team.. [16:11] ogra: ill reboot and try english install i guess :) [16:11] asac, you dont have a UUID value at all ? [16:11] ogra: image is hardy-classmate-20080417.1.img [16:11] ogra: let me boot again to look in fstab [16:12] slangasek: could you check why the latest version of likewise (0ubuntu3) hasn't been published ? [16:13] asac, dont have a second USB key plugged in there or so during install. right ? [16:13] mathiaz: because I accepted it from unapproved like 2 minutes ago [16:13] ogra: no i don't [16:14] just the one from the image [16:14] hmm [16:14] hitting ctrl+d makes it boot properly though [16:14] currently logging into desktop [16:15] amitk, accepted and activated https://edge.launchpad.net/~cmpc-developers/+archive [16:15] ogra: ok in fstab there are /boot /live/cow and /var with a valid UUID [16:15] asac, right [16:15] /home has none though [16:15] and in menu.lst ? [16:15] oh ? [16:15] let me check [16:16] its juust UUID= /home ext3 ... [16:16] ouch [16:16] thats indeed wrong [16:16] ogra: perfect. I'll upload a kernel there later. Meanwhile, don't forget to add that archive to sources.list :) [16:16] pitti: great ! thanks :) - it will be published in the archive within a few hours then. [16:17] amitk, i wont, for sure ... thanks :) [16:17] asac, can you mail me /var/log/cmpcinstaller.log ? [16:19] let me try wifi to get net :) [16:19] ok NM works ;) [16:20] my reference install of this image definatey has a UUID for /home [16:20] ogra: http://paste.ubuntu.com/7676 [16:20] ogra: have you published the scripts that you use to roll these classmate images? I need it for another customer... [16:22] ogra: anythin else you need? [16:22] ill keep it running for now. let me know [16:23] asac, fdisk -l output for /dev/sdb [16:23] amitk, see pm [16:24] ogra: http://paste.ubuntu.com/7677 [16:24] * ogra scratches head [16:25] ogra: what pm? [16:25] amitk, the one i just sent :) === kirkland` is now known as kirkland [16:25] ogra: http://paste.ubuntu.com/7678 [16:26] asac, yes, the formatting fails already [16:26] maybe because there was edubuntu installed before? :) [16:27] nope [16:27] ogra: let me know if there is something i can do to help you ;) [16:28] i could retry :) [16:28] yes, i bet it works the second time ... [16:28] ogra: so do you need more info from this broken install? [16:28] ogra: how do those uuid get generated? [16:30] asac, vol_id [16:30] the prob is that there is no vol_id if the formatting fails [16:30] tkamppeter: I'll have a look [16:33] ogra: ok retry? [16:33] 3 [16:33] 2 [16:33] :) [16:34] * asac restarts classmate to do another install [16:35] ogra: i have three USB devices wen selecting boot device: [16:35] USB:M-Sys uDiskOnChip [16:35] USB:Generic Storage... [16:35] USB:Corsair Flash ... [16:35] the latter is my disc [16:36] right [16:36] Generic is the SD reader [16:37] M-sys is the internal disk [16:37] ogra: ok i try German again ;) [16:38] i suspect the sync call after fdisk fails [16:38] so this install should wrok fine [16:38] ogra: but that should be reproducible? [16:38] hmm [16:38]