TrustHLT/LaCour huggingface dataset:
Hearing: Centrum för rättvisa v. Sweden (no. 35252/08) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2019-07-10 00:00:00)
Case: CASE OF CENTRUM FÖR RÄTTVISA v. SWEDEN
Document type: GRANDCHAMBER
Document date: 2021-05-25 00:00:00
Articles of the Convention concerned: 8, 8-1, 8-2, 34
Issue: Foreign Intelligence Act and Ordinance ; Signals Intelligence Act and Ordinance ; Foreign Intelligence Court Act ; FRA Personal Data Processing Act and Ordinance ; Foreign Intelligence Inspectorate Instructions Ordinance ; Parliamentary Ombudsmen Instructions Act ; Chancellor of Justice Supervision Act

Conclusion: Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life)
Strasbourg case-law cited: Amann v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27798/95, § 69, ECHR 2000 II;Association for European Integration and Human Rights and Ekimdzhiev v. Bulgaria, no. 62540/00, 28 June 2007;Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom, nos. 58170/13 and 2 others, 13 September 2018;Heglas v. the Czech Republic, no. 5935/02, 1 March 2007;Huvig v. France, 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176 B;Kennedy v. the United Kingdom, no. 26839/05, 18 May 2010;Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, Series A no. 28;Leander v. Sweden, 26 March 1987, Series A no. 116;Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 58243/00, 1 July 2008;Malone v. the United Kingdom, 2 August 1984, Series A no. 82;Roman Zakharov v. Russia [GC], no. 47143/06, ECHR 2015;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, ECHR 2000-V;S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, ECHR 2008;Segerstedt-Wiberg and Others v. Sweden, no. 62332/00, § 120, ECHR 2006-VII;Valenzuela Contreras v. Spain, 30 July 1998, § 46, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 V;Weber and Saravia v. Germany (dec.), no. 54934/00, ECHR 2006 XI
External sources: Report of the European Commission for Democracy through Law (the “Venice Commission”) on the Democratic Oversight of Signals Intelligence Agencies (2015)
Hearing: Regner v. the Czech Republic (no. 35289/11) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2016-10-19 00:00:00)
Case: CASE OF REGNER v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
Document type: CHAMBER
Document date: 2015-11-26 00:00:00
Articles of the Convention concerned: 6, 6-1
Issue: Sections 12 and 133 § 3 of Law no. 412/2005
Conclusion: No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Adversarial trial;Equality of arms)
Strasbourg case-law cited: Ankarcrona v. Sweden (dec.), no 35178/97, ECHR 2000 VI;Boulois v. Luxembourg [GC], no 37575/04, §§ 91 and 94, ECHR 2012;Camps v. France (dec.), no 42401/98, 23 November 1999;Čepek v. the Czech Republic, no 9815/10, § 44, 5 September 2013;Ellès and Others v. Switzerland, no 12573/06, § 16, 16 December 2010;Fitt v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 29777/96, ECHR 2000 II;Fodor v. Germany, no 25553/02, 11 December 2006;Güner Çorum v. Turkey, no 59739/00, 31 October 2006;Krčmář and Others v. the Czech Republic, no 35376/97, 3 March 2000;Kress v. France [GC], no 39594/98, ECHR 2001-VI;Masson and Van Zon v. the Netherlands, 28 September 1995, § 51, Series A no 327 A;Mats Jacobsson v. Sweden, 28 June 1990, § 32, Series A no 180 A;Nideröst-Huber v. Switzerland, 18 February 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 I;Nikolova and Vandova v. Bulgaria, no 20688/04, § 91, 17 December 2013;Nikolova and Vandova Matyjek v. Poland, no 38184/03, § 55, 24 April 2007;Obermeier v. Austria, 28 June 1990, § 69, Series A no 179;Prikyan and Angelova v. Bulgaria, no 44624/98, § 40, 16 February 2006;Pudas v. Sweden, 27 October 1987, § 34, Series A no 125 A;Ternovskis v. Latvia, no 33637/02, 29 April 2014;Tinnelly & Sons Ltd and Others and McElduff and Others v. the United Kingdom, 10 July 1998, § 78, Reports 1998 IV;Topal v. Turkey, no 3055/04, § 14, 21 April 2009;Užukauskas v. Lithuania, no 16965/04, 6 July 2010;Vilho Eskelinen and Others v. Finland [GC], no 63235/00, ECHR 2007 II
Hearing: Vasiliauskas v. Lithuania (no. 35343/05)  (Grand Chamber hearing, 2014-06-04 00:00:00)
Case: VASILIAUSKAS v. LITHUANIA
Document type: COMMUNICATEDCASES
Document date: 2009-06-16 00:00:00
Articles of the Convention concerned: 7, 7-2
Conclusion: Communicated
Hearing: Vasiliauskas v. Lithuania (no. 35343/05)  (Grand Chamber hearing, 2014-06-04 00:00:00)
Case: CASE OF VASILIAUSKAS v. LITHUANIA
Document type: GRANDCHAMBER
Document date: 2015-10-20 00:00:00
Articles of the Convention concerned: 7, 7-1, 7-2, 41
Issue: Articles 71 § 2 and 99 of the Lithuanian Criminal Code
Conclusion: Violation of Article 7 - No punishment without law (Article 7-1 - Nullum crimen sine lege;Retroactivity;Criminal offence;Article 7-2 - Criminal offence);Pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
Strasbourg case-law cited: C.R. v. the United Kingdom, 22 November 1995, § 34, Series A no. 335 C;Del Rio Prada v. Spain [GC], no. 42750/09, ECHR 2013;Donohoe v. Ireland, no. 19165/08, § 73, 12 December 2013;Elsholz v. Germany [GC], no. 25735/94, § 66, ECHR 2000 VIII;Jorgic v. Germany, no. 74613/01, §§ 101-102, ECHR 2007 III;K.-H.W. v. Germany, [GC], no. 37201/97, § 74, ECHR 2001 II (extracts);Kipritçi v. Turkey, no. 14294/04, § 18, 3 June 2008;Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, § 52, Series A no. 260 A;Kolk and Kislyiy v. Estonia (dec.), nos. 23052/04 and 24018/04, ECHR 2006 I;Kononov v. Latvia [GC], no. 36376/04, ECHR 2010;Korbely v. Hungary [GC], no. 9174/02, ECHR 2008;Maktouf and Damjanović v. Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC], nos. 2312/08 and 34179/08, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Penart v. Estonia (dec.), 14685/04, 24 January 2006;Pessino v. France, no. 40403/02, § 33, 10 October 2006;S.W. v. the United Kingdom, 22 November 1995, § 36, Series A no. 335 B;Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, § 93, 17 September 2009;Streletz, Kessler and Krenz v. Germany [GC], nos. 34044/96, 35532/97 and 44801/98, § 50, ECHR 2001 II;Waite and Kennedy v. Germany [GC], no. 26083/94, § 54, ECHR 1999 I;Ždanoka v. Latvia [GC], no. 58278/00, § 96, ECHR 2006 IV
External sources: United Nations General Assembly Resolution 96 (I), adopted on 11 December 1946;Articles I, II and V of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide adopted on 9 December 1948;Convention on the Non-Applicability of Statutory Limitations to War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity of 26 November 1968;Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY Statute) of 1993;Statute of the International Tribunal for Rwanda  (ICTR Statute) of 1994;Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court  (ICC Statute) of 1998;Control Council Law no. 10;1953 international treaty law;Article 31 § 1 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties
Hearing: O’Keeffe v. Ireland (no. 35810/09) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2013-03-06 00:00:00)
Case: O'KEEFFE v. IRELAND
Document type: COMMUNICATEDCASES
Document date: 2011-04-05 00:00:00
Articles of the Convention concerned: 3, 6, 8, 13, 13+3, 13+6, 14, 14+3, 14+8, 14+P1-2, P1-2
Conclusion: Communicated
Hearing: O’Keeffe v. Ireland (no. 35810/09) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2013-03-06 00:00:00)
Case: O'KEEFFE v. IRELAND
Document type: DECISIONS
Articles of the Convention concerned: 3, 6, 8, 13, 13+3, 13+6, 14, 14+8, 14+P1-2, 35, 37, 37-1, P1-2
Conclusion: Partly struck out of the list;Partly admissible
Hearing: L.B. v. Hungary (no. 36345/16) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2021-11-03 00:00:00)
Case: L.B. v. HUNGARY
Document type: COMMUNICATEDCASES
Articles of the Convention concerned: 8, 8-1
Conclusion: Communicated
Hearing: L.B. v. Hungary (no. 36345/16) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2021-11-03 00:00:00)
Case: CASE OF L.B. v. HUNGARY
Document type: CHAMBER
Document date: 2021-01-12 00:00:00
Articles of the Convention concerned: 8, 8-1, 8-2, 35
Issue: Section 55(3) and (5) of the Tax Administration Act ; Act CVII of 2011 on the right to informational self-determination of freedom and information (“the Data Protection Act”)
Conclusion: Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life)
Strasbourg case-law cited: A.-M.V. v. Finland, no. 53251/13, § 82, 23 March 2017;Alkaya v. Turkey, no. 42811/06, 9 October 2012;Amann v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27798/95, § 65, ECHR 2000 II;Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48876/08, § 110, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no. 39954/08, § 83, 7 February 2012;Delfi AS v. Estonia [GC], no. 64569/09, § 117, ECHR 2015;Dickson v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 44362/04, § 78, ECHR 2007 V;Dubská and Krejzová v. the Czech Republic [GC], nos. 28859/11 and 28473/12, § 179, 15 November 2016;Egill Einarsson v. Iceland, no. 24703/15, § 46, 7 November 2017;G.S.B. v. Switzerland, no. 28601/11, § 90, 22 December 2015;James and Others v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1986, § 36, Series A no. 98;Leander v. Sweden, 26 March 1987, § 48, Series A no. 116;Lundvall v. Sweden, no. 10473/83, Commission decision of 1 December 1985, Decisions and Reports (DR) 45, p. 131;M.L. and W.W. v. Germany, nos. 60798/10 and 65599/10, § 104, 28 June 2018;Magyar Helsinki Bizottság v. Hungary [GC], no. 18030/11, § 194, 8 November 2016;Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, § 29, Series A no. 251 B;P.G. and J.H. v. the United Kingdom, no. 44787/98, § 57, ECHR 2001 IX;Polyakh and Others v. Ukraine, nos. 58812/15 and 4 others, § 293, 17 October 2019;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, § 46, ECHR 2000 V;S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, ECHR 2008;S.H. and Others v. Austria [GC], no. 57813/00, ECHR 2011).;Šantare and Labazņikovs v. Latvia, no. 34148/07, § 52, 31 March 2016;Satakunnan Markkinapörssi Oy and Satamedia Oy v. Finland [GC], no. 931/13, §§ 136-37, 27 June 2017;Savva Terentyev v. Russia, no. 10692/09, § 79, 28 August 2018;Smirnova v. Russia, nos. 46133/99 and 48183/99, § 95, ECHR 2003 IX (extracts);Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 65731/01 and 65900/01, § 52, ECHR 2006 VI;Tiba v. Romania, no. 36188/09, § 21, 13 December 2016;Vallianatos and Others v. Greece [GC], nos. 29381/09 and 32684/09, § 94, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos. 40660/08 and 60641/08, § 110, ECHR 2012;Vukota-Bojić v. Switzerland, no. 61838/10, § 52, 18 October 2016
External sources: Council of Europe Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data (“the Data Protection Convention”)
Hearing: Lekić v. Slovenia (no. 36480/07) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2018-03-14 00:00:00)
Case: CASE OF LEKIĆ v. SLOVENIA
Document type: CHAMBER
Document date: 2017-02-14 00:00:00
Articles of the Convention concerned: 35, P1-1, P1-1-1
Issue: Companies Act of 1993 ; Financial Operations of Companies Act of 1999

Conclusion: Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Deprivation of property;Peaceful enjoyment of possessions;Possessions)
Strasbourg case-law cited: A.N. v. Lithuania, no. 17280/08, § 77, 31 May 2016;Agrotexim and Others v. Greece, 24 October 1995, § 66, Series A no. 330 A;Baghli v. France, no. 34374/97, § 31, ECHR 1999 VIII;Beyeler v. Italy [GC], no. 33202/96, §§ 109-11, ECHR 2000-I;Cañete de Goñi v. Spain, no. 55782/00, § 36, ECHR 2002-VIII;Cantoni v. France, 15 November 1996, § 35, Reports 1996-V;Capital Bank AD v. Bulgaria, no. 49429/99, §§ 132-34, ECHR 2005-XII (extracts);Company S. and T. v. Sweden, no. 11189/84, Commission decision of 11 December 1986, DR 50, p. 138;Depalle v. France [GC], no. 34044/02, § 77, ECHR 2010;Forminster Enterprises Limited v. the Czech Republic, no. 38238/04, § 59, 9 October 2008;Forrer-Niedenthal v. Germany, no. 47316/99, § 39, 20 February 2003;Fredin v. Sweden (no. 1), 18 February 1991, § 50, Series A no. 192;Guerra and Others v. Italy, 19 February 1998, § 44, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-I;Hasan and Chaush v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 30985/96, § 84, ECHR 2000-XI;Hennings v. Germany, 16 December 1992, § 26, Series A no. 251-A;Hutten-Czapska v. Poland [GC], no. 35014/97, § 165, ECHR 2006-VIII;Iatridis v. Greece [GC], no. 31107/96, § 58, ECHR 1999-II;Jahn and Others v. Germany [GC], nos. 46720/99, 72203/01 and 72552/01, § 91, ECHR 2005-VI;Jokela v. Finland, no. 28856/95, § 45, ECHR 2002-IV;K.-H.W. v. Germany [GC], no. 37201/97, § 73, ECHR 2001 II (extracts);Kurić and Others v. Slovenia [GC], no. 26828/06, § 296, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Olczak v. Poland (dec.), no. 30417/96, ECHR 2002-X;Pokis v. Latvia (dec.), no. 528/02, ECHR 2006-XV;S.C. Antares Transport S.A. and S.C. Transroby S.R.L. v. Romania, no. 27227/08, § 46, 15 December 2015;Sovtransavto Holding v. Ukraine, no. 48553/99, § 91, ECHR 2002-VII;Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden, 23 September 1982, Series A no. 52;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 65731/01, § 52, ECHR 2006 VI;Stolyarova v. Russia, no. 15711/13, § 43, 29 January 2015;The Former King of Greece and Others v. Greece [GC], no. 25701/94, ECHR 2000 XII;Vefa Holding Sh.p.k. and Alimuçaj v. Albania (dec.), no. 24096/05, § 93, 14 June 2011;Vistiņš and Perepjolkins v. Latvia [GC], no. 71243/01, § 98, 25 October 2012;Wittek v. Germany, no. 37290/97, § 49, ECHR 2002-X
Hearing: Murtazaliyeva v. Russia (no. 36658/05) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2018-02-14 00:00:00)
Case: CASE OF MURTAZALIYEVA v. RUSSIA
Document type: CHAMBER
Document date: 2017-05-09 00:00:00
Articles of the Convention concerned: 6, 6+6-3-b, 6+6-3-d, 6-3-b, 6-3-d
Conclusion: No violation of Article 6+6-3-b - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Criminal proceedings;Article 6-3-b - Access to relevant files);No violation of Article 6+6-3-d - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article 6-3-d - Obtain attendance of witnesses)
Hearing: Güzelyurtlu and Others v. Cyprus and Turkey (no. 36925/07) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2018-03-28 00:00:00)
Case: GUZELYURTLU AND OTHERS v. CYPRUS AND TURKEY
Document type: COMMUNICATEDCASES
Document date: 2009-05-13 00:00:00
Articles of the Convention concerned: 2, 13
Conclusion: Communicated
Hearing: Strand Lobben and Others v. Norway (no. 37283/13) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2018-10-17 00:00:00)
Case: STRAND LOBBEN AND OTHERS v. NORWAY
Document type: COMMUNICATEDCASES
Articles of the Convention concerned: 8, 8-1
Conclusion: Communicated
Hearing: Strand Lobben and Others v. Norway (no. 37283/13) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2018-10-17 00:00:00)
Case: CASE OF STRAND LOBBEN AND OTHERS v. NORWAY
Document type: CHAMBER
Document date: 2017-11-30 00:00:00
Articles of the Convention concerned: 8, 8-1, 8-2, 34, 35, 35-1, 35-3-a
Issue: Sections 4-12, 4-20, 4-20a and 4-21 of the Child Welfare Act of 17 July 1992
Conclusion: Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life)
Strasbourg case-law cited: A.K. and L. v. Croatia, no. 37956/11, § 48, 8 January 2013;Aune v. Norway, no. 52502/07, 28 October 2010;Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 96, ECHR 2014;Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, § 37, ECHR 1999 I;Giunta v. Italy, [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, §§ 138-139, ECHR 2000 VIII;Gnahoré v. France, no. 40031/98, ECHR 2000 IX;Görgülü v. Germany, no. 74969/01, § 48, 26 February 2004;Johansen v. Norway (dec.), 12750/02, 10 October 2002;Jovanovic v. Sweden, no. 10592/12, § 77, 22 October 2015;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no. 25702/94, ECHR 2001 VII;Kaburov v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 9035/06, §§ 52-53, 19 June 2012;Kruškić v. Croatia (dec.), no. 10140/13, 25 November 2014;Kutzner v. Germany, no. 46544/99, ECHR 2002 I;Lawlor v. the United Kingdom, no. 12763/87, Commission decision of 14 July 1988, Decisions and Reports (DR) 57, p. 216;Micallef v. Malta [GC], no. 17056/06, §§ 48-49, ECHR 2009;Moustaquim v. Belgium, no. 12313/86, § 36, 18 February 1991;Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland [GC], no. 41615/07, ECHR 2010;Nölkenbockhoff v. Germany, 25 August 1987, § 33, Series A no. 123;Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy [GC], no. 25358/12, 24 January 2017;Price v. the United Kingdom, no. 12402/86, Commission decision of 9 March 1988, DR 55, p. 224;R. and H. v. the United Kingdom, no. 35348/06, § 88, 31 May 2011;Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy, [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, ECHR 2000 VIII;T.S. and J.J. v. Norway (dec.), no. 15633/15, 11 October 2016;Wagner and J.M.W.L. v. Luxembourg, no. 76240/01, § 118, 28 June 2007;Y.C. v. the United Kingdom, no. 4547/10, 13 March 2012;Znamenskaya v. Russia, no. 77785/01, § 27, 2 June 2005
Hearing: Hamalainen v. Finland (no. 37359/09) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2013-10-16 00:00:00)
Case: H. v. FINLAND
Document type: COMMUNICATEDCASES
Document date: 2010-03-23 00:00:00
Articles of the Convention concerned: 8, 8-1, 8-2, 14
Conclusion: Communicated
Hearing: Hamalainen v. Finland (no. 37359/09) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2013-10-16 00:00:00)
Case: CASE OF H. v. FINLAND
Document type: CHAMBER
Document date: 2012-11-13 00:00:00
Articles of the Convention concerned: 8, 8-1, 8-2, 12, 14, 14+8, 35
Issue: Section 2, subsection 1, of the Act on Confirmation of the Gender of a Transsexual
Conclusion: Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);No violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life;Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life)
Strasbourg case-law cited: Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13378/05, § 60, ECHR 2008;Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28957/95, ECHR 2002-VI;E.B. v. France [GC], no. 43546/02, § 47, 22 January 2008;Grant v. the United Kingdom, no. 32570/03, ECHR 2006-VII;Karner v. Austria, no. 40016/98, ECHR 2003-IX;Keegan v. Ireland, 26 May 1994, § 49, Series A no. 290;L. and V. v. Austria, nos. 39392/98 and 39829/98, § 45, ECHR 2003-I;L. v. Lithuania, no. 27527/03, ECHR 2007-IV;Parry v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 42971/05, 28 November 2006;Petrovic v. Austria, 27 March 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-II;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, § 65, ECHR 2002-III;R. and F. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 35748/05, 28 November 2006;Rees v. the United Kingdom, 17 October 1986, § 49, Series A no. 106;Schalk and Kopf v. Austria, no. 30141/04, ECHR 2010;Smith and Grady v. the United Kingdom, nos. 33985/96 and 33986/96, § 90, ECHR 1999-VI;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 65731/01, § 52, ECHR 2006-VI;Van Kück v. Germany, no. 35968/97, ECHR 2003-VII
Hearing: Hamalainen v. Finland (no. 37359/09) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2013-10-16 00:00:00)
Case: CASE OF HÄMÄLÄINEN v. FINLAND
Document type: GRANDCHAMBER
Document date: 2014-07-16 00:00:00
Articles of the Convention concerned: 8, 8-1, 12, 14, 14+12, 14+8
Issue: Section 2 of the Transsexuals (Confirmation of Gender) Act
Conclusion: No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life);No violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life;Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life);No violation of Article 14+12 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 12 - Men and women;Right to marry)
Strasbourg case-law cited: A, B and C v. Ireland [GC], no 25579/05, § 245, ECHR 2010;Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, § 33, Series A no 32;B. v. France, 25 March 1992, § 63, Series A no 232-C;Botta v. Italy, 24 February 1998, § 35, Reports 1998-I;Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 13378/05, § 60, ECHR 2008;Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 28957/95, ECHR 2002-VI;Dickson v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 44362/04, § 78, ECHR 2007 V;E.B. v. France [GC], no 43546/02, § 47, 22 January 2008;Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 6339/05, § 77, ECHR 2007 I;Fretté v. France, no 36515/97, § 41, ECHR 2002 I;Gaskin v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, § 42, Series A no 160;Glass v. the United Kingdom, no 61827/00, §§ 74-83, ECHR 2004 II;Grant v. the United Kingdom, no 32570/03, §§ 39-44, ECHR 2006 VII;Karner v. Austria, no 40016/98, § 37, ECHR 2003 IX;Konstantin Markin v. Russia [GC], no 30078/06, § 127, ECHR 2012;L. and V. v. Austria, nos. 39392/98 and 39829/98, § 45, ECHR 2003 I;L. v. Lithuania, no 27527/03, ECHR 2007 IV;McGinley and Egan v. the United Kingdom, 9 June 1998, § 101, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 III;Nitecki v. Poland (dec.), no 65653/01, 21 March 2002;Odièvre v. France [GC], no 42326/98, ECHR 2003 III;Pentiacova and Others v. Moldova (dec.), no 14462/03, ECHR 2005 I;Petrovic v. Austria, 27 March 1998, § 38, Reports 1998 II;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no 2346/02, § 71, ECHR 2002 III;Rees v. the United Kingdom, 17 October 1986, §§ 43-44, Series A no 106;Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 32555/96, § 162, ECHR 2005 X;S.H. and Others v. Austria [GC], no 57813/00, § 94, ECHR 2011;Schalk and Kopf v. Austria, no 30141/04, ECHR 2010;Sentges v. the Netherlands (dec.), no 27677/02, 8 July 2003;Smith and Grady v. the United Kingdom, nos. 33985/96 and 33986/96, § 90, ECHR 1999 VI;Söderman v. Sweden [GC], no 5786/08, § 78, ECHR 2013;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 65731/01 and 65900/01, § 52, ECHR 2006 VI;Vallianatos and Others v. Greece [GC], nos. 29381/09 and 32684/09, ECHR 2013;Van Kück v. Germany, no 35968/97, ECHR 2003 VII;X and Others v. Austria [GC], no 19010/07, § 99, ECHR 2013;X and Y v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1985, Series A no 91;X, Y and Z v. the United Kingdom, 22 April 1997, §  44, Reports 1997 II
Hearing: Georgia v. Russia (II)  (no. 38263/08) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2018-05-23 00:00:00)
Case: GEORGIA v. RUSSIA (II)
Document type: DECISIONS
Articles of the Convention concerned: 33, 35, 35-1, 35-3-a
Conclusion: Preliminary objections joined to merits;Admissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione loci;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae
Strasbourg case-law cited: Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, § 68, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV;Al-Adsani v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 35763/97, § 55, ECHR 2001-XI;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom ([GC], no. 55721/07, 7 July 2011 ECHR 2011-...;Cyprus v. Turkey, no. 25781/94, Commission decision of 28 June 1996, Decisions and Reports (DR) 86-A, p. 130;Cyprus v. Turkey, no. 25781/94, Commission decision of 28 June 1996, DR 86-A, p. 130;Denmark v. Turkey (dec), no. 34382/97, 8 June 1999;Drozd and Janousek v. France and Spain, 26 June 1992, § 91, Series A no. 240;Ergi v. Turkey, 28 July 1998, §§ 79 and 82, Reports 1998-IV;France, Norway, Denmark, Sweden, Netherlands v. Turkey, nos. 9940-9944/82, Commission decision of 6 December 1983, DR 35;Georgia v. Russia (no. I) (dec.), no. 13255/07, 30 June 2009;Ilascu and Others v. Moldova and Russia (dec.) [GC], no. 48787/99, 4 July 2001;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, § 159, Series A no. 25;Isayeva v. Russia, no. 57950/00, §§ 180 and 210, 24 February 2005;Loizidou v. Turkey (preliminary objections) [GC], 23 March 1995, Series A no. 310;Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064/90, 16065/90, 16066/90, 16068/90, 16069/90, 16070/90, 16071/90, 16072/90 and 16073/90, 18 September 2009
External sources: Order of 15 October 2008 of the International Court of Justice;Judgment of 1 April 2011 of the International Court of Justice;Report of 27 November 2008 of the ODIHR of the OSCE;Report of September 2009 by the Independent International Fact-Finding Mission of the European Union on the Conflict in Georgia;Reports of 17 December 2008 and 26 January 2009 of the Monitoring Committee and Resolutions nos. 1633 and 1647 of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe