TrustHLT/LaCour huggingface dataset:
Hearing: Lopes de Sousa Fernandes v. Portugal (no. 56080/13) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2016-11-16 00:00:00)
Case: CASE OF LOPES DE SOUSA FERNANDES v. PORTUGAL
Document type: CHAMBER
Document date: 2015-12-15 00:00:00
Articles of the Convention concerned: 2, 2-1, 41
Conclusion: Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Positive obligations;Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
Strasbourg case-law cited: Arskaya v. Ukraine, no 45076/05, § 89, 5 December 2013;Asiye Genç v. Turkey, no 24109/07, § 82, 27 January 2015;Bajić v. Croatia, no 41108/10, § 93, 13 November 2012;Byrzykowski v. Poland, no 11562/05, 27 June 2006, § 104;Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no 32967/96, ECHR 2002‑I;Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 96, ECHR 2014;Codarcea v. Romania, no 31675/04, § 104, 2 June 2009;De Santis and Olanda v. Italy (dec.), no 35887/11, § 45, 9 July 2013;Dodov v. Bulgaria, no 59548/00, § 87-98, 17 January 2008;Erikson v. Italy (dec.), no 37900/97, 26 October 1999;Glass v. the United Kingdom, no 61827/00, § 87, ECHR 2004 II;Guerra and Others v. Italy, 19 February 1998, § 44, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-I;Hristozov and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 47039/11 and 358/12, § 122, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Kaya v. Turkey, 19 February 1998, §§ 74-78 and 86-92, Reports 1998 I;Kudra v. Croatia, no 13904/07, § 120, 18 December 2012;L.C.B. v. the United Kingdom, 9 June 1998, § 36, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 III;Lazzarini and Ghiacci v. Italy (dec.), no 53749/00, 7 November 2002;Mastromatteo v. Italy [GC], no 37703/97, §§ 89‑90, ECHR 2002‑VIII;McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no 28883/95, §§ 116-161, ECHR 2001 III;Mehmet Şentürk and Bekir Şentürk v. Turkey, no 13423/09, § 97, ECHR 2013;Micallef v. Malta [GC], no 17056/06, § 49, ECHR 2009;N.B. v. Slovakia, no 29518/10, §§ 76 à 78, 12 June 2012;Nencheva and Others v. Bulgaria, no 48609/06, § 88, 18 June 2013;Oyal v. Turkey, no 4864/05, §§ 74-76, 23 March 2010;Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 46477/99, 4 June 2001;Počkajevs v. Latvia (dec.), no. 76774/01, 21 October 2004;Powell v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 45305/99, ECHR 2000-V;Pūpēdis v. Latvia (dec.), no 53631/00, 15 February 2001;R.M.D. v. Switzerland, 26 September 1997, § 54, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997‑VI;Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], no 52391/99, §§ 286-289 and 323-357, ECHR 2007-II;Scavuzzo-Hager and Others v. Switzerland, no 41773/98, §§ 53-69 and 80-86, 7 February 2006;Šilih v. Slovenia [GC], no. 71463/01, § 195, 9 April 2009;Süleyman Ege v. Turkey, no 45721/09, § 59, 25 June 2013;Trocellier v. France (dec.), no 75725/01, ECHR 2006–XIV;V.C. v. Slovakia, no 18968/07, §§ 107 à 117, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Vo v. France [GC], no 53924/00, § 90, ECHR 2004-VIII;Worm v. Austria (dec.), no 22714/93, 27 November 1995
Hearing: Károly Nagy v. Hungary (no. 56665/09) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2016-10-12 00:00:00)
Case: CASE OF KÁROLY NAGY v. HUNGARY
Document type: CHAMBER
Document date: 2015-12-01 00:00:00
Articles of the Convention concerned: 6, 6-1, 35
Conclusion: Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court)
Strasbourg case-law cited: Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, §§ 65-66, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;Albert and Le Compte v. Belgium, 10 February 1983, § 29, Series A no. 58;Anheuser-Busch Inc. v. Portugal [GC], no. 73049/01, § 83, ECHR 2007 I;Ashingdane v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, § 57, Series A no. 93;Athanassoglou and Others v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27644/95, § 48, ECHR 2000 IV;Balakin v. Russia, no. 21788/06, § 52, 4 July 2013;Baudler v. Germany (dec.), no. 38254/04, 6 December 2011;Bellet v. France, 4 December 1995, § 36, Series A no. 333 B;Bochan v. Ukraine (no. 2) [GC], no. 22251/08, § 42, ECHR 2015;Boulois v. Luxembourg [GC], no. 37575/04, §§ 90-91, ECHR 2012;Case “relating to certain aspects of the laws on the use of languages in education in Belgium” (merits), 23 July 1968, Series A no. 6, pp. 33-34, § 9;Delfi AS v. Estonia [GC], no. 64569/09, § 127, ECHR 2015;Dietrich Reuter v. Germany (dec.), nos. 32741/06 and 19568/09, 17 January 2012;Fayed v. the United Kingdom, 21 September 1994, § 65, Series A no. 294 B;Gherghina v. Romania (dec.) [GC], no. 42219/07, 9 July 2015;Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, § 36, Series A no. 18;Jeunesse v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 12738/10, § 110, 3 October 2014;Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906/04, § 159, ECHR 2008;König v. Germany, 28 June 1978, § 88, Series A no. 27;Le Calvez v. France, 29 July 1998, § 56, Reports 1998 V;Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v. Belgium, 23 June 1981, Series A no. 43;Markovic and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 1398/03, ECHR 2006 XIV;Masson and Van Zon v. the Netherlands, 28 September 1995, § 49, Series A no. 327-A;Micallef v. Malta [GC], no. 17056/06, § 74, ECHR 2009;Mocanu and Others v. Romania [GC], nos. 10865/09, 45886/07 and 32431/08, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Müller v. Germany (dec.), no. 12986/04, 6 December 2011;Rekvényi v. Hungary [GC], no. 25390/94, §§ 67-68, ECHR 1999 III;Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 32555/96, ECHR 2005 X;Rohlena v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 59552/08, § 51, ECHR 2015;Roland Reuter v. Germany (dec.), no. 39775/04, 6 December 2011;Sabeh El Leil v. France [GC], no. 34869/05, § 47, 29 June 2011;Sierpiński v. Poland, no. 38016/07, §§ 87 and 90, 3 November 2009;Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden, 23 September 1982, § 81, Series A no. 52;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760/06, §§ 229-230, ECHR 2012;Stichting Mothers of Srebrenica and Others v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 65542/12, § 120, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Tinnelly & Sons Ltd and Others and McElduff and Others v. the United Kingdom, 10 July 1998, § 61, Reports 1998 IV;Vučković and Others v. Serbia [GC], no. 17153/11, §§ 69-71, 25 March 2014;Yanakiev v. Bulgaria, no. 40476/98, § 58, 10 August 2006
Hearing: Károly Nagy v. Hungary (no. 56665/09) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2016-10-12 00:00:00)
Case: CASE OF KÁROLY NAGY v. HUNGARY
Document type: GRANDCHAMBER
Document date: 2017-09-14 00:00:00
Articles of the Convention concerned: 6, 6-1, 35, 35-3-a
Issue: Section 15 (2) of the 1990 Church Act ; Article 130 (1) f of the Code of Civil Procedure ; Sections 9 and 29 of Statute no. II of 1994 ; Sections 34, 35, 77 and 79  of Statute no. I of 2000
Conclusion: Inadmissible (Article 35-3-a - Ratione materiae)
Strasbourg case-law cited: Al-Dulimi and Montana Management Inc. v. Switzerland [GC], no. 5809/08, § 97, 21 June 2016;Azinas v. Cyprus [GC], no. 56679/00, § 38, ECHR 2004-III;Baka v. Hungary [GC], no. 20261/12, § 100, 23 June 2016;Béláné Nagy v. Hungary [GC], no. 53080/13, § 43, ECHR 2016;Blokhin v. Russia [GC], no. 47152/06, § 91, ECHR 2016;Bochan v. Ukraine (no. 2) [GC], no. 22251/08, § 42, ECHR 2015;Boulois v. Luxembourg [GC], no. 37575/04, § 91, ECHR 2012;Lupeni Greek Catholic Parish and Others v. Romania [GC], no. 76943/11, 29 November 2016;Nejdet Şahin and Perihan Şahin v. Turkey [GC], no. 13279/05, §§ 49-50, 20 October 2011;Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 32555/96, §§ 119-120, ECHR 2005 X;Stichting Mothers of Srebrenica and Others v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 65542/12, § 120, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Z and Others v. the United Kingdom[GC], no. 29392/95, § 89, ECHR 2001 V
Hearing: Bédat v. Switzerland (no. 56925/08) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2015-05-13 00:00:00)
Case: CASE OF A.B. v. SWITZERLAND
Document type: CHAMBER
Document date: 2014-07-01 00:00:00
Articles of the Convention concerned: 10, 10-1, 10-2
Conclusion: Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression)
Strasbourg case-law cited: Ageyevy v. Russia, no 7075/10, §§ 224-225, 18 April 2013;Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 48876/08, § 100, ECHR 2013;Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no 39954/08, § 108, 7 February 2012;Barthold v. Germany, 25 March 1985, § 58, Series A no 90;Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no 21980/93, § 62, ECHR 1999 III;Campos Dâmaso v. Portugal, no 17107/05, § 35, 24 April 2008;Dammann v. Switzerland, no 77551/01, § 57, 25 April 2006;De Haes and Gijsels v. Belgium, 24 February 1997, § 37, Reports 1997-I;Dupuis and Others v. France, no 1914/02, 7 June 2007;Ernst and Others v. Belgium, no 33400/96, § 98, 15 July 2003;Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no 29183/95, § 45, ECHR 1999 I;Hachette Filipacchi Associés (ICI PARIS) v. France, no 12268/03, § 40, 23 July 2009;Handyside v. the United Kingdom, 7 December 1976, § 49 in fine, Series A no 24;Jersild v. Denmark, 23 September 1994, Series A no 298;Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July v. France [GC], nos. 21279/02 and 36448/02, § 59, ECHR 2007 IV;Lingens v. Austria, 8 July 1986, § 44, Series A no 103;Lopes Gomes da Silva v. Portugal, no 37698/97, § 36, ECHR 2000 X;Monnat v. Switzerland, no 73604/01, § 70, ECHR 2006 X;Mouvement raëlien suisse v. Switzerland [GC], no 16354/06, § 48, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Ormanni v. Italy, no 30278/04, § 59, 17 July 2007;Perna v. Italy [GC], no 48898/99, § 39, ECHR 2003 V;Pinto Coelho v. Portugal, no 28439/08, § 33, 28 June 2011;Prager and Oberschlick v. Austria, 26 April 1995, § 38, Series A no 313;Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom, no 68416/01, § 87, ECHR 2005 II;Stoll v. Switzerland [GC], no 69698/01, ECHR 2007 V;Sürek v. Turkey (no 1) [GC], no 26682/95, ECHR 1999-IV;Thoma v. Luxembourg, no 38432/97, §§ 43 45, ECHR 2001 III;Tourancheau and July v. France, no 53886/00, 24 November 2005;Wingrove v. the United Kingdom, 25 November 1996, § 58, Reports 1996 V;Worm v. Austria, 29 August 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-V
Hearing: Savran v. Denmark (no. 57467/15) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2020-06-24 00:00:00)
Case: SAVRAN v. DENMARK
Document type: COMMUNICATEDCASES
Articles of the Convention concerned: 8, 8-1
Conclusion: Communicated
Hearing: Savran v. Denmark (no. 57467/15) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2020-06-24 00:00:00)
Case: CASE OF SAVRAN v. DENMARK
Document type: CHAMBER
Document date: 2019-10-01 00:00:00
Articles of the Convention concerned: 3, 41
Conclusion: Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Conditional) (Turkey);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
Strasbourg case-law cited: Aswat v. the United Kingdom, no. 17299/12, § 57, 16 April 2013;Bensaid v. the United Kingdom, no. 44599/98, ECHR 2001 I;D. v. the United Kingdom, 2 May 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 III;F.G. v. Sweden [GC], no. 43611/11, § 115, 23 March 2016;Hamsevic v Denmark (dec.), 25748/15, § 28, 16 May 2017;J.K. and Others v. Sweden [GC], no. 59166/12, § 127, ECRH 2016;Lopata v. Russia, no. 72250/01, § 168, 13 July 2010;Maslov v. Austria [GC], no. 1638/03, §§ 72-73, ECHR 2008;N. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 26565/05, § 43, ECHR 2008;Osman v. Denmark, no. 38058/09, § 88, 14 June 2011;Paposhvili v. Belgium, [GC], no. 41738/10, 13 December 2016;Tarakhel v. Switzerland [GC], no. 29217/12, § 120, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Tatar v. Switzerland, no. 65692/12, 14 April 2015
Hearing: Hutchinson v. the United Kingdom (no. 57592/08) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2015-10-21 00:00:00)
Case: CASE OF HUTCHINSON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Document type: CHAMBER
Document date: 2015-02-03 00:00:00
Articles of the Convention concerned: 3, 35
Issue: Section 30 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 ; Section 6(1) of the Human Rights Act 1998 ; Chapter 12 of the Indeterminate Sentence Manual (“the Lifer Manual”)

Conclusion: No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading punishment;Inhuman punishment) (Substantive aspect)
Strasbourg case-law cited: C.R. v. the United Kingdom, 22 November 1995, § 34, Series A no. 335 C;Cooper v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48843/99, § 125, ECHR 2003 XII;Harakchiev and Tolumov v. Bulgaria, nos. 15018/11 and 61199/12, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906/04, ECHR 2008;László Magyar v. Hungary, no. 73593/10, §§ 46-53, 20 May 2014;Öcalan v. Turkey (no. 2), nos. 24069/03, 197/04, 6201/06 and 10464/07, §§ 193-198, 18 March 2014;Söderman v. Sweden [GC], no. 5786/08, § 102, ECHR 2013;Vinter and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 66069/09, 130/10 and 3896/10, 9 July 2013;Vučković and Others v. Serbia [GC], no. 17153/11, § 80, 25 March 2014;Waite and Kennedy v. Germany [GC], no. 26083/94, § 54, ECHR 1999 I
External sources: Rules 6, 102.1 and 103.8 of the European Prison Rules;COE Committee of Ministers Resolution 76(2);COE Committee of Ministers Recommendation 2003(23) (on the management by prison administrations of life sentence and other long-term prisoners);COE Committee of Ministers Recommendation 2003(22) (on conditional release);Article 10 § 3 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the General Comment on that Article
Hearing: Hutchinson v. the United Kingdom (no. 57592/08) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2015-10-21 00:00:00)
Case: CASE OF HUTCHINSON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Document type: GRANDCHAMBER
Document date: 2017-01-17 00:00:00
Articles of the Convention concerned: 3
Issue: Section 30 of the Crime (Sentences) Act 1997 ; Section 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998
Conclusion: No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading punishment;Inhuman punishment) (Substantive aspect)
Strasbourg case-law cited: Bodein v. France, no. 40014/10, 13 November 2014;Čačko v. Slovakia, no. 49905/08, 22 July 2014;E. v. Norway, 29 August 1990, § 60, Series A no. 181 A;Harakchiev and Tolumov v. Bulgaria, nos. 15018/11 and 61199/12, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906/04, ECHR 2008;Khoroshenko v. Russia [GC], no. 41418/04, § 121, ECHR 2015;Kronfeldner v. Germany, no. 21906/09, § 59, 19 January 2012;László Magyar v. Hungary, no. 73593/10, 20 May 2014;Murray v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 10511/10, ECHR 2016;O.H. v. Germany, no. 4646/08, § 118, 24 November 2011;Öcalan v. Turkey (no. 2), nos. 24069/03, 197/04, 6201/06 and 10464/07, 18 March 2014;Trabelsi v. Belgium, no. 140/10, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Vinter and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 66069/09, 130/10 and 3896/10, ECHR 2013 (extracts)
Hearing: Söderman v. Sweden (no. 5786/08 ) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2013-04-03 00:00:00)
Case: CASE OF E.S. v. SWEDEN
Document type: CHAMBER
Document date: 2012-06-21 00:00:00
Articles of the Convention concerned: 8, 8-1
Issue: Sections 1-13 of Chapter 6, sections 10a and 17 of Chapter 16 and section 1 of Chapter 23 of the Penal Code ; Chapter 17, section 3 and Chapter 30, section 3 of the Code of Judicial Procedure ; sections 1 and 3 of Chapter 2 of the Tort Liability Act
Conclusion: No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life)
Strasbourg case-law cited: A v. Croatia, no. 55164/08, § 60, 14 October 2010;Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, § 32, Series A no. 32;Bladh v. Sweden (dec.), no. 46125/06, §§ 23-27, 10 November 2009;Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28957/95, § 74, ECHR 2002-VI;Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 6339/05, § 77, ECHR 2007-I;Fexler v. Sweden, no. 36801/06, § 44, 13 October 2011;K.U. v. Finland, no. 2872/02, 2 December 2008;Korbely v. Hungary [GC], no. 9174/02, §§70-71, ECHR 2008;M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, ECHR 2003-XII;Mosley v. the United Kingdom, no. 48009/08, § 109, 10 May 2011;Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 74, ECHR 1999-V;Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos. 40660/08 and 60641/08, § 104, 7 February 2012;Von Hannover v. Germany, no. 59320/00, § 70, ECHR 2004-VI;X and Y v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1985, Series A no. 91
External sources: Convention on the Protection of Children against Sexual Exploitation and Sexual Abuse
Hearing: Söderman v. Sweden (no. 5786/08 ) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2013-04-03 00:00:00)
Case: CASE OF SÖDERMAN v. SWEDEN
Document type: GRANDCHAMBER
Document date: 2013-11-12 00:00:00
Articles of the Convention concerned: 8, 8-1, 41
Issue: Tort Liability Act ; Chapter 6, Article 7 § 3 and Chapter 16, Article 10a of the Penal Code  ; Freedom of the Press Act ; Fundamental Law on Freedom of Expression
Conclusion: Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Non-pecuniary damage - award
Strasbourg case-law cited: A v. Croatia, no. 55164/08, § 60, 14 October 2010;Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, § 32, Series A no. 32;Al-Jedda v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27021/08, § 117, ECHR 2011;Bevacqua and S. v. Bulgaria, no. 71127/01, § 65, 12 June 2008;Brecknell v. the United Kingdom, no. 32457/04, § 64, 27 November 2007;C.A.S. and C.S. v. Romania, no. 26692/05, 20 March 2012;Đorđević v. Croatia, no. 41526/10, §§141-43, ECHR 2012;Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 6339/05, § 77, ECHR 2007 I;K.U. v. Finland, no. 2872/02, §§ 45-49, ECHR 2008-V;M. and C. v. Romania, no. 29032/04, §§ 112 et seq., 27 September 2011;M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, ECHR 2003 XII;M.P. and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 22457/08, §§ 109 110, 15 November 2011;Mosley v. the United Kingdom, no. 48009/08, § 109, 10 May 2011;Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no. 10593/08, § 245, ECHR 2012;Nejdet Şahin and Perihan Şahin v. Turkey [GC], no. 13279/05, § 49, 20 October 2011;Odièvre v. France [GC], no. 42326/98, § 46, ECHR 2003 III;Osman v. the United Kingdom, 28 October 1998, §§ 128-30, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 VIII, §§ 128-30;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, § 65, ECHR 2002 III;Reklos and Davourlis v. Greece, no. 1234/05, 15 January 2009;Sandra Janković v. Croatia, no. 38478/05, § 45, 5 March 2009;Schüssel v. Austria (dec.), no. 42409/98, 21 February 2002;Siliadin v. France, no. 73316/01, § 130, ECHR 2005 VII;Szula v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 18727/06, 4 January 2007;Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos. 40660/08 and 60641/08, ECHR 2012;X and Others v. Austria [GC], no. 19010/07, § 163, ECHR 2013;X and Y v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1985, Series A no. 91;Z and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392/95, § 73, ECHR 2001 V
Hearing: Al-Dulimi and Montana Management Inc. v. Switzerland (no. 5809/08) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2014-12-10 00:00:00)
Case: CASE OF AL-DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. SWITZERLAND
Document type: CHAMBER
Document date: 2013-11-26 00:00:00
Articles of the Convention concerned: 1, 6, 6-1, 35, 35-3, 41
Conclusion: Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-3 - Ratione personae);Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-3 - Ratione materiae);Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court;Civil rights and obligations);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed
Strasbourg case-law cited: Aït-Mouhoub v. France, 28 October 1998, § 52, Reports 1998-VIII;Al-Adsani v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 35763/97, § 55, ECHR 2001-XI;Al-Jedda v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 27021/08, ECHR 2011;Al-Saadoon and Mufdhi v. the United Kingdom, no 61498/08, § 128, ECHR 2010;Al Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 55721/07, ECHR 2011;Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no 71503/01, § 137, ECHR 2004-II;Banković and Others v. Belgium and Others (dec.) [GC], no 52207/99, ECHR 2001 XII;Behrami and Behrami  v. France and Saramati v. France, Germany and Norway (dec.) [GC], nos. 71412/01 and 78166/01, 2 May 2007;Běleš and Others v. the Czech Republic, no 47273/99, § 49, ECHR 2002-IX;Blagojević v. the Netherlands (dec.), no 49032/07, § 46, 9 June 2009;Bosphorus Hava Yolları Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim Şirketi v. Ireland [GC], no 45036/98, ECHR 2005 VI;Cudak v. Lithuania [GC], no 15869/02, §§ 54-55, ECHR 2010;Fayed v. the United Kingdom, 21 September 1994, § 65, Series A no 294-B;Fogarty v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 37112/97, § 33, ECHR 2001-XI;Galić v. the Netherlands (dec.), no 22617/07, § 46, 9 June 2009;Gasparini v. Italy and Belgium (dec.), no 10750/03, 12 May 2009;Gentilhomme, Schaff-Benhadji and Zerouki v. France, nos. 48205/99, 48207/99 and 48209/99, § 20, 14 May 2002;Glor v. Switzerland, no 13444/04, § 48, ECHR 2009;Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, Series A no 18;Guerra and Others v. Italy, 19 February 1998, § 44, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 I;Ilaşcu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no 48787/99, §§ 311-312, ECHR 2004-VII;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no 30696/09, § 338, ECHR 2011;Michaud v. France, no 12323/11, § 103, 6 December 2012;Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no 10593/08, ECHR 2012;Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland [GC], no 41615/07, § 131, ECHR 2010;Prince Hans-Adam II of Liechtenstein v. Germany [GC], no 42527/98, § 43, ECHR 2001-VIII;Rambus Inv. v. Germany (dec.), no 40382/04, 16 June 2009;Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, § 86, Series A no 161;T.P. and K.M. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 28945/95, § 98, ECHR 2001-V;United Communist Party of Turkey and Others v. Turkey, 30 January 1998, § 29, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 I;Waite and Kennedy v. Germany [GC], no 26083/94, § 59, ECHR 1999-I
Hearing: Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom (no. 58170/13), Bureau of Investigative Journalism and Alice Ross v. the United Kingdom (no. 62322/14) and 10 Human Rights Organisations and Others v. the United Kingdom (no. 24960/15) (Chamber hearing, 2017-11-07 00:00:00)
Case: BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM AND ALICE ROSS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Document type: COMMUNICATEDCASES
Articles of the Convention concerned: 8, 8-1, 10, 10-1
Conclusion: Communicated
Hearing: Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom (no. 58170/13), Bureau of Investigative Journalism and Alice Ross v. the United Kingdom (no. 62322/14) and 10 Human Rights Organisations and Others v. the United Kingdom (no. 24960/15) (Chamber hearing, 2017-11-07 00:00:00)
Case: 10 HUMAN RIGHTS ORGANISATIONS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Document type: COMMUNICATEDCASES
Articles of the Convention concerned: 6, 6-1, 8, 8-1, 10, 10-2, 14
Conclusion: Communicated
Hearing: Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom (nos. 58170/13, 62322/14 and 24960/15) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2019-07-10 00:00:00)
Case: BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM AND ALICE ROSS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Document type: COMMUNICATEDCASES
Articles of the Convention concerned: 8, 8-1, 10, 10-1
Conclusion: Communicated
Hearing: Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom (nos. 58170/13, 62322/14 and 24960/15) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2019-07-10 00:00:00)
Case: 10 HUMAN RIGHTS ORGANISATIONS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Document type: COMMUNICATEDCASES
Articles of the Convention concerned: 6, 6-1, 8, 8-1, 10, 10-2, 14
Conclusion: Communicated
Hearing: Armani Da Silva v. the United Kingdom (no. 5878/08) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2015-06-10 00:00:00)
Case: ARMANI DA SILVA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Document type: COMMUNICATEDCASES
Document date: 2010-09-28 00:00:00
Articles of the Convention concerned: 2, 13
Conclusion: Communicated