Hearing: Savran v. Denmark (no. 57467/15) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2020-06-24 00:00:00)
Case: CASE OF SAVRAN v. DENMARK
Document type: GRANDCHAMBER
Document date: 2021-12-07 00:00:00
Articles of the Convention concerned: 3, 8, 8-1, 8-2, 41
Issue: Section 50a of the Aliens Act ; Articles 16 § 2 and 68 of the Danish Penal Code
Conclusion: No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Turkey);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Expulsion;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life) (Turkey);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
Strasbourg case-law cited: A.W. Khan v. the United Kingdom, no. 47486/06, § 32, 12 January 2010;Aswat v. the United Kingdom, no. 17299/12, § 49, 16 April 2013;Azerkane v. the Netherlands, no. 3138/16, § 70, 2 June 2020;Belli and Arquier-Martinez v. Switzerland, no. 65550/13, § 65, 11 December 2018;Bensaid v. the United Kingdom, no. 44599/98, §§ 16 and 37, ECHR 2001 I;Bouchelkia v. France, 29 January 1997, § 41, Reports 1997 I;Bouyid v. Belgium [GC], no. 23380/09, § 86, ECHR 2015;D. v. the United Kingdom, 2 May 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 III;T.C.E. v. Germany, no. 58681/12, § 54, 1 March 2018;El Ghatet v. Switzerland, no. 56971/10, § 47, 8 November 2016;Emonet and Others v. Switzerland, no. 39051/03, § 35, 13 December 2007;Ezzouhdi v. France, no. 47160/99, § 26, 13 February 2001;Hamesevic v. Denmark (dec.), no. 25748/15, §§ 31 and 46, 16 May 2017;Hristozov and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 47039/11 and 358/12, § 111, ECHR 2012 (extracts);I.M. v. Switzerland, no. 23887/16, §§ 62 and 70, 9 April 2019;K.A. v. Switzerland, no. 62130/15, § 41, 7 July 2020;Keles v. Germany, no. 32231/02, §§ 65-66, 27 October 2005;Khan v. Denmark, no. 26957/19, § 79, 12 January 2021;Külekci v. Austria, no. 30441/09, §§ 39 and 51, 1 June 2017;Kurić and Others v. Slovenia [GC], no. 26828/06, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Levakovic v. Denmark, no. 7841/14, 23 October 2018;Maslov v. Austria [GC], no. 1638/03, ECHR 2008;Mehemi v. France, 26 September 1997, § 41, Reports 1997 VI;N. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 26565/05, § 29, ECHR 2008;Narjis v. Italy, no. 57433/15, 14 February 2019;Nasri v. France, 13 July 1995, § 44, Series A no. 320 B;Ndidi v. the United Kingdom, no. 41215/14, § 76, 14 September 2017;Öneryıldız v. Turkey [GC], no. 48939/99, §§ 141 and 149, ECHR 2004 XII;Osman v. Denmark, no. 38058/09, § 88, 14 June 2011;Paposhvili v. Belgium [GC], no. 41738/10, 13 December 2016;Pormes v. the Netherlands, no. 25402/14, § 48, 28 July 2020;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, § 50, ECHR 2002 III;Radovanovic v. Austria (just satisfaction), no. 42703/98, § 11, 16 December 2004;Radovanovic v. Austria, no. 42703/98, § 37, 22 April 2004;Ramos Nunes de Carvalho e Sá v. Portugal [GC], nos. 55391/13 and 2 others, §§ 87-88, 6 November 2018;S.M. v. Croatia [GC], no. 60561/14, § 216, 25 June 2020;Saber and Boughassal v. Spain, nos. 76550/13 and 45938/14, 18 December 2018;Shala v. Switzerland, no. 52873/09, § 46, 15 November 2012;Tatar v. Switzerland, no. 65692/12, § 16, 14 April 2015;Üner v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 46410/99, ECHR 2006 XII;Veljkovic-Jukic v. Switzerland, no. 59534/14, § 57, 21 July 2020;Yesthla v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 37115/11, § 32, 15 January 2019;Yildiz v. Austria, no. 37295/97, § 51, 31 October 2002;Yilmaz v. Germany, no. 52853/99, §§ 47-49, 17 April 2003