TrustHLT/LaCour huggingface dataset:
Hearing: Bouyid v. Belgium (no. 23380/09) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2014-10-08 00:00:00)
Case: CASE OF BOUYID v. BELGIUM
Document type: CHAMBER
Document date: 2013-11-21 00:00:00
Articles of the Convention concerned: 3, 35
Conclusion: Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect)
Strasbourg case-law cited: Campbell and Cosans v. the United Kingdom, 25 February 1982, § 30, Series A no 48;Costello-Roberts v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1993, § 32, Series A no 247 C;Creanğa v. Romania [GC], no 29226/03, § 88, 23 February 2012;El Masri v. “the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” [GC], no. 39630/09, ECHR 2012;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, Series A no 25;Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no 54810/00, § 67, ECHR 2006-IX;Kudła v. Poland [GC], no 30210/96, § 92, ECHR 2000-XI;Labita v. Italy [GC], no 26772/95, § 121, ECHR 2000 IV;M.S.S. v. Belgium [GC], no 30696/09, § 220, ECHR 2011;Mete and Others v. Turkey, no 294/08, 4 October 2012;Perez v. France [GC], no 47287/99, § 70, ECHR 2004 I;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no 2346/02, § 52, ECHR 2002-III;Ribitsch v. Austria, 4 December 1995, § 38, Series A no 336;Rivas v. France, no 59584/00, 1 April 2004;Salman v. Turkey [GC], no 21986/93, ECHR 2000 VII
Hearing: Buzadji v. Republic of Moldova (no. 23755/07) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2015-10-07 00:00:00)
Case: CASE OF BUZADJI v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Document type: CHAMBER
Document date: 2014-12-16 00:00:00
Articles of the Convention concerned: 5, 5-3
Conclusion: Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-trial detention)
Hearing: Mustafa Tunç and Fecire Tunç v. Turkey (no. 24014/05) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2014-04-16 00:00:00)
Case: CASE OF MUSTAFA TUNÇ AND FECİRE TUNÇ v. TURKEY
Document type: CHAMBER
Document date: 2013-06-25 00:00:00
Articles of the Convention concerned: 2, 2-1, 35, 41
Conclusion: Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Non-pecuniary damage - award
Strasbourg case-law cited: Abdurashidova v. Russia, no 32968/05, § 69, 8 April 2010;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 55721/07, § 167, ECHR 2011;Angelova v. Bulgaria, no 38361/97, § 138, ECHR 2002-IV;Anik and Others v. Turkey, no 63758/00, §§ 76-77, 5 June 2007;Beker v. Turkey, no 27866/03, 24 March 2009;Giuliani and Gaggio v. Italy [GC], no 23458/02, ECHR 2011;Gürkan v. Turkey (no 10987/10, §§ 13 to 19, 3 July 2012;Hugh Jordan v. the United Kingdom, no 24746/94, § 109, ECHR 2001-III;Kolevi v. Bulgaria, no 1108/02, § 201, 5 November 2009;Mantog v. Romania no 2893/02, §§ 70 et seq., 11 October 2007;McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no 28883/95, § 129, ECHR 2001-III;Pankov v. Bulgaria, no 12773/03, § 59, 7 October 2010;Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], no 52391/99, ECHR 2007-II;Salman v. Turkey ([GC], no 21986/93, § 99, ECHR 2000-VII;Selmouni v. France [GC], no 25803/94, § 87, ECHR 1999-V;Šilih v. Slovenia [GC], no 71463/01, § 157, 9 April 2009;Stefan v. Romania (dec.), no 5650/04, § 48, 29 November 2011;Stern v. France (dec.), no 70820/01, 11 October 2005;Suprun v. Ukraine (dec.), no 7529/07, 27 April 2010;Trévalec v. Belgium, no. 30812/07, § 89, 14 June 2011;Trufin v. Romania, no 3990/04, § 52, 20 October 2009;Velcea and Mazare v. Romania, no 64301/01, 1 December 2009;Yotova v. Bulgaria, no 43606/04, § 68, 23 October 2012
Hearing: A and B v. Norway (nos. 24130/11 and 29758/11) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2016-01-13 00:00:00)
Case: CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY
Document type: GRANDCHAMBER
Document date: 2016-11-15 00:00:00
Articles of the Convention concerned: P7-4
Issue: Sections 10 2(1), 10 4(1), 12-1(1)(a) and 12-2 of the Tax Assessment Act
Conclusion: No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 - Right not to be tried or punished twice-{general} (Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 - Right not to be tried or punished twice;Criminal offence)
Strasbourg case-law cited: Achour v. France [GC], no. 67335/01, § 44, ECHR 2006 IV;Boman v. Finland, no. 41604/11, 17 February 2015;Carlberg v. Sweden (dec.), no. 9631/04, 27 January 2009;Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, 8 June 1976, § 82, Series A no. 22;Franz Fischer v. Austria, no. 37950/97, § 29, 29 May 2001;Glantz v. Finland, no. 37394/11, 20 May 2014;Göktan v. France, no. 33402/96, § 51, ECHR 2002 V;Gradinger v. Austria, 23 October 1995, § 51, Series A no. 328 C;Grande Stevens and Others v. Italy, nos. 18640/10, 18647/10, 18663/10, 18668/10 and 18698/10, 4 March 2014;Haarvig v. Norway (dec.), no. 11187/05, 11 December 2007;Janosevic v. Sweden, no. 34619/97, §§ 68-71, ECHR 2002-VII;Jussila v. Finland [GC], no. 73053/01, § 43, ECHR 2006 XIV;Kapetanios and Others v. Greece, nos. 3453/12, 42941/12 and 9028/13, §72, 30 April 2015;Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, § 68, Series A no. 28;Kudła v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 152, ECHR 2000 XI;Lucky Dev v. Sweden, no. 7356/10, 27 November 2014;Maaouia v. France [GC], no. 39652/98, § 36, ECHR 2000-X;Manasson v. Sweden (dec.), no. 41265/98, 8 April 2003;Mjelde v. Norway (dec.), no. 11143/04, 11 February 2007;Muslija v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, no 32042/11, 14 January 2014;Nykänen v. Finland, no. 11828/11, 20 May 2014;Österlund v. Finland, no. 53197/13, 10 February 2015;Phillips v. the United Kingdom, no. 41087/98, § 34, ECHR 2001 VII;R.T. v. Switzerland (dec.), no. 31982/96, 30 May 2000;Rinas v. Finland, no. 17039/13, 27 January 2015;Rosenquist v. Sweden (dec.), no. 60619/00, 14 September 2004;Ruotsalainen v. Finland, no 13079/03, 16 June 2009;Sismanidis and Sitaridis v. Greece, nos. 66602/09 and 71879/12, 9 June 2016;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.) [GC], nos. 65731/01 and 65900/01, § 48, ECHR 2005 X;Storbråten v. Norway (dec.), no. 12277/04, 1 February 2007;Synnelius and Edsbergs Taxi AB v. Sweden (dec.), no. 44298/02, 17 June 2008;Taxquet v. Belgium [GC], no. 926/05, § 83, ECHR 2010;Tomasović v. Croatia, no. 53785/09, 18 October 2011;Västberga Taxi Aktiebolag and Vulic v. Sweden, no. 36985/97, §§ 79-82, 23 July 2002;Sergey Zolotukhin v. Russia [GC], no. 14939/03, ECHR 2009
Hearing: Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy (no. 25358/12) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2015-12-09 00:00:00)
Case: CASE OF PARADISO AND CAMPANELLI v. ITALY
Document type: CHAMBER
Document date: 2015-01-27 00:00:00
Articles of the Convention concerned: 8, 8-1, 8-2, 35, 35-3, 41
Conclusion: Preliminary objection allowed (Article 35-3 - Ratione personae);Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
Strasbourg case-law cited: Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, § 62, Series A no 94;Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, §§ 65-69, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;E.B. v. France [GC], no 43546/02, § 41, 22 January 2008;Gaskin v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, § 39, Series A no 160;Gnahoré v. France, no 40031/98, § 50, ECHR 2000 IX;Havelka and Others v. the Czech Republic, no 23499/06, §§ 34-35, 21 June 2007;Johnston and Others v. Ireland, 18 December 1986, § 55, Series A no 112;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no 25702/94, ECHR 2001 VII;Keegan v. Ireland, 26 May 1994, §§ 44-45, Series A no 290;Kroon and Others v. the Netherlands, 27 October 1994, § 30, Series A no 297-C;Kutzner v. Germany, no 46544/99, § 56, ECHR 2002-I;Labassee v. France, no 65941/11, § 60, 26 June 2014;Marckx v. Belgium, 13 June 1979, § 31, Série A no 31;Mennesson v. France, no 65192/11, § 81, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Mikulić v. Croatia, no 53176/99, ECHR 2002 I;Moretti and Benedetti v. Italy, no 16318/07, 27 April 2010;Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no 10593/08, §§ 168-169, ECHR 2012;Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland [GC], no 41615/07, § 136, ECHR 2010;Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, § 29, Series A no 251-B;Nylund v. Finland (dec.), no 27110/95, ECHR 1999-VI;Pini and Others v. Romania, nos. 78028/01 and 78030/01, § 148, ECHR 2004-V;Pontes v. Portugal, no 19554/09, §§ 74-80, 10 April 2012;Pontes v. Portugal, no 19554/09, § 74, 10 April 2012;S.D., D.P., and T. v. the United Kingdom, no 23714/94, decision of the Commission of 20 May 1996;Scordino v. Italy (dec.), no 36813/97, ECHR 2003 IV;Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, § 148, ECHR 2000 VIII;Wagner and J.M.W.L. v. Luxembourg, no 76240/01, 28 June 2007;Wallová and Walla v. the Czech Republic, no 23848/04, § 47, 26 October 2006;X, Y and Z v. the United Kingdom, 22 April 1997, § 36, Reports 1997 II;Y.C. v. the United Kingdom, no 4547/10, §§ 133-138, 13 March 2012;Zhou v. Italy, no 33773/11, §§ 55-56, 21 January 2014
Hearing: Dvorski v. Croatia (no. 25703/11) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2015-01-21 00:00:00)
Case: CASE OF DVORSKI v. CROATIA
Document type: CHAMBER
Document date: 2013-11-28 00:00:00
Articles of the Convention concerned: 3, 6, 6+6-3-c, 6-1, 6-3-c, 35
Issue: Article 177 § 5 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
Conclusion: Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance;Legal assistance of his own choosing)
Strasbourg case-law cited: Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, § 24, Series A no. 32;Al-Khawaja and Tahery v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 26766/05 and 22228/06, § 118, ECHR 2011;Benham v. the United Kingdom, 10 June 1996, § 52, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 III;Bogumil v. Portugal, no. 35228/03, § 46, 7 October 2008;Bykov v. Russia [GC], no. 4378/02, 10 March 2009;Campbell and Fell v. the United Kingdom, 28 June 1984, § 99, Series A no. 80;Croissant v. Germany, 25 September 1992, §§ 29 and 30, Series A no. 237-B;Czekalla v. Portugal, no. 38830/97, § 60, ECHR 2002 VIII;Desde v. Turkey, no. 23909/03, § 130, 1 February 2011;Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, § 187, ECHR 2010;Güveç v. Turkey, no. 70337/01, §§ 130-131, ECHR 2009;Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 27765/09, ECHR 2012;Imbrioscia v. Switzerland, 24 November 1993, § 38, Series A no. 275;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, § 161, Series A no. 25;Klimentyev v. Russia, no. 46503/99, §§ 116-119, 16 November 2006;Krombach v. France, no. 29731/96, ECHR 2001 II;Kudła v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, ECHR 2000-XI;Kulikowski v. Poland, no. 18353/03, § 55, 19 May 2009;Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119-121, ECHR 2000-IV;Luchaninova v. Ukraine, no. 16347/02, § 62, 9 June 2011;Magee v. the United Kingdom, no. 28135/95, § 45, ECHR 2000 VI;Mamaç and Others v. Turkey, nos. 29486/95, 29487/95 and 29853/96, § 48, 20 April 2004;Martin v. Estonia, no. 35985/09, § 95-97, 30 May 2013;Neziraj v. Germany, no. 30804/07, § 45, 8 November 2012;O’Kane v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 30550/96, 6 July 1999;Pakelli v. Germany, 25 April 1983, § 31, Series A no. 64;Pavlenko v. Russia, no. 42371/02, § 98, 1 April 2010;Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, § 67, ECHR 2001-III;Pishchalnikov v. Russia, no. 7025/04, §§ 77-79, 24 September 2009;Poitrimol v. France, 23 November 1993, § 29, Series A no. 277 A;Prehn v. Germany (dec.), no. 40451/06, 24 August 2010;Riviere v. France, no. 33834/03, § 62, 11 July 2006;Rowe and Davis v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28901/95, § 60, ECHR 2000-II;Ryabov v. Russia, no. 3896/04, §§ 40 and 43, 31 January 2008;Sakhnovskiy v. Russia [GC], no. 21272/03, § 94, 2 November 2010;Salduz v. Turkey [GC], no. 36391/02, 27 November 2008;Sarıkaya v. Turkey, no. 36115/97, § 67, 22 April 2004;Stanford v. the United Kingdom, 23 February 1994, § 28, Series A no. 282 A;Velikova v. Bulgaria, no. 41488/98, § 50, ECHR 2000-VI;Whitfield and Others v. the United Kingdom, nos. 46387/99, 48906/99, 57410/00 and 57419/00, § 48, 12 April 2005;Zagorodniy v. Ukraine, no. 27004/06, §§ 51-52, 24 November 2011
Hearing: Dvorski v. Croatia (no. 25703/11) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2015-01-21 00:00:00)
Case: CASE OF DVORSKI v. CROATIA
Document type: GRANDCHAMBER
Document date: 2015-10-20 00:00:00
Articles of the Convention concerned: 6, 6+6-3-c, 6-1, 6-3-c, 41
Issue: Articles 177 § 5 and 502 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
Conclusion: Violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance;Legal assistance of his own choosing;Article 6 - Right to a fair trial);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
Strasbourg case-law cited: Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, § 24, Series A no. 32;Aras v. Turkey (no. 2), no. 15065/07, § 62, 18 November 2014;Artico v. Italy, 13 May 1980, § 33, Series A no. 37;Baloga v. Ukraine, no. 620/05, § 38, 16 September 2010;Bykov v. Russia [GC], no. 4378/02, § 103, 10 March 2009;Croissant v. Germany, 25 September 1992, § 29-31, Series A no. 237-B;Dayanan v. Turkey, no. 7377/03, § 32, 13 October 2009;De Jong, Baljet and Van den Brink v. the Netherlands, 22 May 1984, § 48, Series A no. 77;Delcourt v. Belgium, 17 January 1970, § 31, Series A no. 11;Denk v. Austria, no. 23396/09, § 24, 5 December 2013;Erkapić v. Croatia, no. 51198/08, §§ 80-82, 25 April 2013;Goddi v. Italy, 9 April 1984, § 30, Series A no. 76;Gürkan v. Turkey, no. 10987/10, § 26, 3 July 2012;Hanif and Khan v. the United Kingdom, nos. 52999/08 and 61779/08, § 155, 20 December 2011;Horvatić v. Croatia, no. 36044/09, §§ 80-82, 17 October 2013;Imbrioscia v. Switzerland, 24 November 1993, §§ 36-38, Series A no. 275;Klimentyev v. Russia, no. 46503/99, §§ 116-118, 16 November 2006;Lisica v. Croatia, no. 20100/06, § 60, 25 February 2010;Magee v. the United Kingdom, no. 28135/95, § 45, ECHR 2000 VI;Maresti v. Croatia, no. 55759/07, § 75, 25 June 2009;Martin v. Estonia, no. 35985/09, §§ 90-97, 30 May 2013;Mayzit v. Russia, no. 63378/00, 20 January 2005;Meftah and Others v. France [GC], nos. 32911/96, 35237/97 and 34595/97, §§ 45-48, ECHR 2002 VII;Moser v. Austria, no. 12643/02, § 108, 21 September 2006;Panovits v. Cyprus, no. 4268/04, 11 December 2008;Pavlenko v. Russia, no. 42371/02, 1 April 2010;Pishchalnikov v. Russia, no. 7025/04, § 77-79, 24 September 2009;Poitrimol v. France, 23 November 1993, § 31, Series A no. 277-A;Popov v. Russia, no. 26853/04, § 173, 13 July 2006;Prehn v. Germany (dec.), no. 40451/06, 24 August 2010;Salduz v. Turkey [GC], no. 36391/02, ECHR 2008;Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no. 56581/00, § 86, ECHR 2006-II;Vitan v. Romania, no. 42084/02, §§ 58-64, 25 March 2008;Zagorodniy v. Ukraine, no. 27004/06, §§ 52-55, 24 November 2011
Hearing: Guðmundur Andri Ástráðsson v. Iceland (no. 26374/18) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2020-02-05 00:00:00)
Case: GUDMUNDUR ANDR ÁSTRÁÐSSON v. ICELAND
Document type: COMMUNICATEDCASES
Articles of the Convention concerned: 6, 6-1
Conclusion: Communicated
Hearing: Guðmundur Andri Ástráðsson v. Iceland (no. 26374/18) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2020-02-05 00:00:00)
Case: CASE OF GUÐMUNDUR ANDRI ÁSTRÁÐSSON v. ICELAND
Document type: CHAMBER
Document date: 2019-03-12 00:00:00
Articles of the Convention concerned: 6, 6-1, 41
Issue: Administrative Procedures Act No. 37/1993 ; Temporary provision IV of the Judiciary Act No. 50/2016

Conclusion: Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Tribunal established by law);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
Strasbourg case-law cited: Beuze v. Belgium [GC], no. 71409/10, 9 November 2018, § 119;Coëme and Others v. Belgium, nos. 32492/96 and 4 others, § 98, ECHR 2000 VII;DMD GROUP, a.s., v. Slovakia, no. 19334/03, § 61, 5 October 2010;Gorguiladzé v. Georgia, no. 4313/04, § 68, 20 October 2009;Ibrahim and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 50541/08, 50571/08, 50573/08 and 40351/09, § 315, 13 September 2016;Jorgic v. Germany, no. 74613/01, § 64, ECHR 2007-III (extracts);Lavents v. Latvia, no. 58442/00, § 114, 28 November 2002;Moreira Ferreira v. Portugal (no. 2) [GC], no. 19867/12, § 99, 11 July 2017;Morice v. France [GC], no. 29369/10, § 78, 23 April 2015;Pandjikidzé and Others v. Georgia, no. 30323/02, § 104, 27 October 2009;Ramos Nunes de Carvalho E SÁ v Portugal [GC], nos. 55391/13, 57728/13 and 74041/13, §§ 144 and 222, 6 November 2018;Savino and Others v. Italy, nos. 17214/05, 20329/05 and 42113/04, § 94, 28 April 2009;Zand v. Austria, no. 7360/76, Commission report of 12 October 1978, Decisions and Reports (DR) 15, pp. 70 and 80
Hearing: Tagayeva and Others v. Russia (no. 26562/07) (Chamber hearing, 2014-10-14 00:00:00)
Case: TAGAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Document type: DECISIONS
Articles of the Convention concerned: 2, 3, 6, 8, 10, 13, 13+2, 35, 37, 37-1
Conclusion: Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible;Partly struck out of the list
Hearing: X. v. Latvia (no. 27853/09) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2012-10-10 00:00:00)
Case: CASE OF X v. LATVIA
Document type: CHAMBER
Document date: 2011-12-13 00:00:00
Articles of the Convention concerned: 8, 8-1, 8-2, 41
Conclusion: Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Art. 8;Non-pecuniary damage - award
Strasbourg case-law cited: Bronda v. Italy, 9 June 1998, § 52, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-IV;Eskinazi and Chelouche v. Turkey (dec.), no. 14600/05, 6 December 2005;García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999-I;Hokkanen v. Finland, 23 September 1994, § 55, Series A no. 299-A;Iosub Caras v. Romania, no. 7198/04, § 41, 27 July 2006;Kruslin v. France, 24 April 1990, § 27, Series A no. 176-A;Maumousseau and Washington v. France, no. 39388/05, 6 December 2007;Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland [GC], no. 41615/07, § 138, 6 July 2010;Nikolova v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 31195/96, § 69, ECHR 1999-II;Sahin v. Germany [GC], no. 30943/96, § 73, ECHR 2003-VIII;Šneersone and Kampanella v. Italy, no. 14737/09, 12 July 2011, § 95;Sommerfeld v. Germany [GC], no. 31871/96, § 64, ECHR 2003-VIII (extracts);The Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 1), 26 April 1979, § 49, Series A no. 30;W. v. the United Kingdom, 8 July 1987, § 64, Series A no. 121
External sources: Article 3 and 13b of the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction;Australian Family Law Act 1975
Hearing: X. v. Latvia (no. 27853/09) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2012-10-10 00:00:00)
Case: CASE OF X v. LATVIA
Document type: GRANDCHAMBER
Document date: 2013-11-26 00:00:00
Articles of the Convention concerned: 8, 8-1, 8-2, 41
Issue: Section 644 of the Latvian Civil Procedure Act
Conclusion: Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life)
Strasbourg case-law cited: Amann v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27798/95, § 50, ECHR 2000 II;Artico v. Italy, 13 May 1980, § 33, Series A no. 37;B. v. Belgium, no. 4320/11, §§ 70-72, 10 July 2012;Demir and Baykara v. Turkey [GC), no. 34503/97, § 67, ECHR 2008-...;Eskinazi and Chelouche v. Turkey (dec.), no. 14600/05, ECHR 2005 XIII (extracts);García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999 I;Hokkanen v. Finland, 23 September 1994, § 55, Series A no. 299-A;Iglesias Gil and A.U.I. v. Spain, no. 56673/00, § 51, ECHR 2003 V;Ignaccolo-Zenide v. Romania, no. 31679/96, § 95, 25 January 2000;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no. 25702/94, § 154, ECHR 2001 VII;Kurić and Others v. Slovenia [GC], no. 26828/06, § 341, ECHR 2012-...;Loizidou v. Turkey (Preliminary Objections), 23 March 1995, § 93, Series A no. 310;M. R. and L. R. v. Estonia (dec.), no. 13420/12, § 37, 15 May 2012;Maire v. Portugal, no. 48206/99, § 72, ECHR 2003 VII;Maslov v. Austria [GC], no. 1638/03, § 91, ECHR 2008-...;Maumousseau and Washington v. France, no. 39388/05, § 79, 6 December 2007;Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no. 10593/08, 12 September 2012, ECHR 2012-...;Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland, ([GC], no. 41615/07, §§ 49-55, ECHR 2010-...;Raban v. Romania, no. 25437/08, § 28, 26 October 2010;Slivenko v. Latvia [GC], no. 48321/99, § 100, ECHR 2003 X;Šneersone and Kampanella, no. 14737/09, 12 July 2011
External sources: Articles 3, 11, 13 b) and 20 of the Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction;Article 24 § 2 of the European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights;Council Regulation (EC) No. 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility (known as “Brussels II bis Regulation”)
Hearing: NIT S.R.L. v. the Republic of Moldova (no. 28470/12) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2020-10-14 00:00:00)
Case: NIT S.R.L. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Document type: COMMUNICATEDCASES
Articles of the Convention concerned: 10, 10-1, P1-1
Conclusion: Communicated
Hearing: Khasanov and Rakhmanov v. Russia (nos. 28492/15 and 49975/15) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2021-01-20 00:00:00)
Case: S.R. v. RUSSIA
Document type: COMMUNICATEDCASES
Articles of the Convention concerned: 3
Conclusion: Communicated
Hearing: Khasanov and Rakhmanov v. Russia (nos. 28492/15 and 49975/15) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2021-01-20 00:00:00)
Case: CASE OF T.K. AND S.R. v. RUSSIA
Document type: CHAMBER
Document date: 2019-11-19 00:00:00
Articles of the Convention concerned: 3
Conclusion: No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Extradition) (Conditional) (Kyrgyzstan)
Strasbourg case-law cited: Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, § 67, Series A no. 94;Dzhaksybergenov v. Ukraine, no. 12343/10, §§ 36-38, 10 February 2011;F.G. v. Sweden [GC], no. 43611/11, §§ 111-130, ECHR 2016;Gayratbek Saliyev v. Russia, no. 39093/13, §§ 61-62, 17 April 2014;H.L.R. v. France, 29 April 1997, § 41, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 III;J.K. and Others v. Sweden [GC], no. 59166/12, §§ 77-105, ECHR 2016;Kadirzhanov and Mamashev v. Russia, nos. 42351/13 and 47823/13, §§ 96-97, 17 July 2014;Khamrakulov v. Russia, no. 68894/13, § 69, 16 April 2015;L.M. and Others v. Russia, nos. 40081/14 and 2 others, § 108, 15 October 2015;Makhmudzhan Ergashev v. Russia, no. 49747/11, §§ 69-73, 16 October 2012;Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey [GC], nos. 46827/99 and 46951/99, § 67, ECHR 2005 I;Mamazhonov v. Russia, no.17239/13, §§ 127-135 and 141, 23 October 2014;Othman (Abu Qatada) v. the United Kingdom, no. 8139/09, § 188, 17 January 2012;S.H. v. the United Kingdom, no. 19956/06, §§ 69-71, 15 June 2010;Saadi v. Italy [GC], no. 37201/06, §§ 125 and 148, ECHR 2008;Shamayev and Others v. Georgia and Russia, no. 36378/02, § 337, ECHR 2005 III;Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, § 91, Series A no. 161;Sufi and Elmi v. the United Kingdom, nos. 8319/07 and 11449/07, §§ 216 and 218, 28 June 2011;Turgunov v. Russia, no. 15590/14, § 32, 22 October 2015
Hearing: Al Nashiri v. Poland (no. 28761/11) and Husayn (Abu Zubaydah) v. Poland (no. 7511/13) (Chamber hearing, 2013-12-03 00:00:00)
Case: AL NASHIRI v. POLAND
Document type: COMMUNICATEDCASES
Document date: 2012-07-10 00:00:00
Articles of the Convention concerned: 2, 3, 5, 5-1, 6, 8, 8-1, 10, 13, P6-1, P6-2
Conclusion: Communicated
Hearing: Dubská and Krejzová v. the Czech Republic (nos. 28859/11 and 28473/12) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2015-12-02 00:00:00)
Case: DUBSKÁ v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
Document type: COMMUNICATEDCASES
Document date: 2012-09-03 00:00:00
Articles of the Convention concerned: 8, 8-1
Conclusion: Communicated
Hearing: Dubská and Krejzová v. the Czech Republic (nos. 28859/11 and 28473/12) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2015-12-02 00:00:00)
Case: KREJZOVÁ v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
Document type: COMMUNICATEDCASES
Document date: 2012-09-03 00:00:00
Articles of the Convention concerned: 8, 8-1, 14
Conclusion: Communicated