TrustHLT/LaCour huggingface dataset:
Hearing: Fernandes de Oliveira v. Portugal (no. 78103/14) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2018-03-07 00:00:00)
Case: FERNANDES DE OLIVEIRA v. PORTUGAL
Document type: COMMUNICATEDCASES
Articles of the Convention concerned: 2, 2-1
Conclusion: Communicated
Hearing: Fernandes de Oliveira v. Portugal (no. 78103/14) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2018-03-07 00:00:00)
Case: CASE OF FERNANDES DE OLIVEIRA v. PORTUGAL
Document type: CHAMBER
Document date: 2017-03-28 00:00:00
Articles of the Convention concerned: 2, 2-1, 41
Conclusion: Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Positive obligations;Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
Strasbourg case-law cited: Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967/96, § 49, ECHR 2002 I;Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 131, ECHR 2014;Dodov v. Bulgaria, no. 59548/00, § 80, 17 January 2008;Editions Plon v. France, no. 58148/00, § 64, ECHR 2004 IV;Guerra and Others v. Italy, 19 February 1998, § 44, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 I;Haas v. Switzerland, no. 31322/07, § 54, ECHR 2011;Hiller v. Austria, no. 1967/14, §§ 52-53, 22 November 2016;Igor Shevchenko v. Ukraine, no. 22737/04, § 60, 12 January 2012;Jagiełło v. Poland (dec.) [Committee], no. 21782/15, § 23, 24 January 2017;Keenan v. the United Kingdom, no. 27229/95, § 111, ECHR 2001 III;Kudra v. Croatia, no. 13904/07, § 113, 18 December 2012;L.C.B. v. the United Kingdom, 9 June 1998, § 36, Reports 1998 III;Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 86, ECHR 2002 II;Renolde v. France, no. 5608/05, § 81, ECHR 2008 (extracts);Reynolds v. the United Kingdom, no. 2694/08, 13 March 2012;Rivière v. France, no. 33834/03, § 63, 11 July 2006;Šilih v. Slovenia [GC], no. 71463/01, §§ 155 and 195, 9 April 2009;Tanrıbilir v. Turkey, no. 21422/93, §§ 70-71, 16 November 2000
Hearing: Fernandes de Oliveira v. Portugal (no. 78103/14) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2018-03-07 00:00:00)
Case: CASE OF FERNANDES DE OLIVEIRA v. PORTUGAL
Document type: GRANDCHAMBER
Document date: 2019-01-31 00:00:00
Articles of the Convention concerned: 2, 2-1, 35, 41
Issue: Mental Health Act (Law no. 36/98 of 24 July 1998) ; Guidelines of the Directorate General of Health on restraint no. 21/2011 dated 6 June 2011 ; Article 2 § 2, c) of Regulatory Decree No. 66/2007, of 29 May 2007, as amended by Regulatory Decree No. 21/2008, of 2 December 2008

Conclusion: Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Positive obligations;Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
Strasbourg case-law cited: Bilbija and Blaževic v. Croatia, no 62870/13, § 107, 12 January 2016;Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no 32967/96, ECHR 2002 I;Çoselav v. Turkey, no 1413/07, § 57, 9 October 2012;De Donder and De Clippel v. Belgium, no 8595/06, § 75, 6 December 2011;Dodov v. Bulgaria, no 59548/00, § 80, 17 January 2008;Haas v. Switzerland, no 31322/07, § 54, ECHR 2011;Hiller v. Austria, no 1967/14, 22 November 2016;J.N. v. the United Kingdom, no 37289/12, § 77, 19 May 2016;Keenan v. the United Kingdom, no 27229/95, ECHR 2001 III;Ketreb v. France, no 38447/09, § 78, 19 July 2012;Lopes de Sousa Fernandes v. Portugal [GC], no 56080/13, 19 December 2017;Mitic v. Serbia, no 31963/08, 22 January 2013;Osman v. the United Kingdom, 28 October 1998, §§ 115-116, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 VIII;Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685/10 and 22768/12, § 126, 20 March 2018;Renolde v. France, no 5608/05, ECHR 2008 (extracts);Reynolds v. the United Kingdom, no 2694/08, 13 March 2012;Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan (just satisfaction) [GC], no 40167/06, § 61, 12 Decembre 2017;Šilih v. Slovenia [GC], no 71463/01, §196, 9 April 2009;Volk v. Slovenia, no 62120/09, § 86, 13 December 2012;Younger v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 57420/00, ECHR 2003 I
Hearing: Fábián v. Hungary (no. 78117/13) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2016-11-09 00:00:00)
Case: FÁBIÁN v. HUNGARY
Document type: COMMUNICATEDCASES
Articles of the Convention concerned: 14, P1-1
Conclusion: Communicated
Hearing: Fábián v. Hungary (no. 78117/13) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2016-11-09 00:00:00)
Case: CASE OF FÁBIÁN v. HUNGARY
Document type: CHAMBER
Document date: 2015-12-15 00:00:00
Articles of the Convention concerned: 14, 14+P1-1-1, 41, P1-1, P1-1-1
Conclusion: Violation of Article 14+P1-1-1 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Possessions;Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property);Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
Strasbourg case-law cited: Carson and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 42184/05, § 70, ECHR 2010;Gaygusuz v. Austria, 16 September 1996, §§ 41-42, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;Karlheinz Schmidt v. Germany, § 22, 18 July 1994, Series A no. 291-B
Hearing: B. v. Switzerland (no. 78630/12) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2021-06-16 00:00:00)
Case: CASE OF B. v. SWITZERLAND
Document type: CHAMBER
Document date: 2020-10-20 00:00:00
Articles of the Convention concerned: 8, 8-1, 14, 14+8, 41
Issue: Sections 23 and 24 of the Federal Law of 20 December 1946 on pension insurance and survivors (“LAVS”)
Conclusion: Violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Insufficient reparation under national law;Just satisfaction)
Strasbourg case-law cited: Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, § 82, Series A no 94;Artico v. Italy, 13 May 1980, § 33, Series A no 37;Belli and Arquier Martinez v. Switzerland, no 65550/13, 11 December 2018;Burghartz v. Switzerland, 22 February 1994, § 27, Series A no 280 B;Claes and Others v. Belgium, nos. 46825/99, § 53, 2 June 2005;Dhahbi v. Italy, no 17120/09, § 41, 8 April 2014;Di Trizio v. Switzerland, no 7186/09, 2 February 2016;Fábián v. Hungary [GC], no 78117/13, § 112, 5 September 2017;G.M.B. and K.M. v. Switzerland (dec.), no 36797/97, 27 September 2001;Gaygusuz v. Austria, 16 September 1996, § 42, Reports 1996 IV;Gençel v. Turkey, no 53431/99, § 27, 23 October 2003;Glor v. Switzerland, no 13444/04, § 52, ECHR 2009;Inze v. Austria, 28 October 1987, § 41, Series A no 126;Khamtokhu and Aksenchik v. Russia [GC], nos. 60367/08 and 961/11, § 53, 24 January 2017;Kimlya and Others v. Russia, nos. 76836/01 and 32782/03, § 86, ECHR 2009;Konstantin Markin v. Russia [GC], no 30078/06, §§ 126-127 and 130, ECHR 2012;Lithgow and Others v. the United Kingdom, 8 July 1986, Series A no 102, § 177;Merger and Cros v. France, no 68864/01, § 46, 22 December 2004;Mikulić v. Croatia, no 53176/99, § 53, ECHR 2002 I;National & Provincial Building Society, Leeds Permanent Building Society and Yorkshire Building Society v. the United Kingdom, 23 October 1997, § 88, Reports 1997 VII;Otgon v. the Republic of Moldova, no 22743/07, 25 October 2016;Petrovic v. Austria, 27 March 1998, §§ 27 and 30, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 II;Rasmussen v. Denmark, 28 November 1984, § 40, Series A no 87;Sahin v. Germany [GC], no 30943/96, § 85, ECHR 2003 VIII;Schuler Zgraggen v. Switzerland, 24 June 1993, § 67, Series A no 263;Stafford v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 46295/99, § 68, ECHR 2002 IV;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 65731/01 and 65900/01, §§ 51 and 63-64, ECHR 2006 VI;Ünal Tekeli v. Turkey, no 29865/96, §§ 54 and 63, ECHR 2004 X;Vallianatos and Others v. Greece [GC], nos. 29381/09 and 32684/09, § 72, ECHR 2013;Vasilenkov v. Ukraine, no 19872/02, § 18, 3 May 2005;Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) v. Switzerland (no 2) [GC], no 32772/02, § 88, ECHR 2009;Weller v. Hungary, no 44399/05, §§ 28-29, 31 March 2009;Yuriy Romanov v. Russia, no 69341/01, § 45, 25 October 2005;Zarb Adami v. Malta, no 17209/02, §§ 71-73, ECHR 2006 VIII
Hearing: N.D. and N.T. v. Spain (no. 8675/15) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2018-09-26 00:00:00)
Case: CASE OF N.D. AND N.T. v. SPAIN
Document type: CHAMBER
Document date: 2017-10-03 00:00:00
Articles of the Convention concerned: 1, 13, 13+P4-4, 34, 35, 35-1, 35-3-a, 41, P4-4
Conclusion: Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 34 - Victim);Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-3-a - Ratione materiae);Violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 - Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens-{general} (Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 - Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens);Violation of Article 13+P4-4 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 - Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens-{general};Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
Strasbourg case-law cited: Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 55721/07, § 137, ECHR 2011;Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no 71503/01, § 139, ECHR 2004-II;Banković and Others v. Belgium and Others (dec.) [GC], no 52207/99, ECHR 2001-XII;Berdzenishvili and Others v. Russia, nos.  14594/07 and 6 others, 20 December 2016;Čonka v. Belgium, no 51564/99, ECHR 2002 I;De Souza Ribeiro v. France [GC], no 22689/07, § 83;Georgia v. Russia (I) (dec.), 13255/07, 36 June 2009;Hasan v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 29750/09, § 74, ECHR 2014;Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], no 27765/09, ECHR 2012;Ilaşcu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no 48787/99, ECHR 2004 VII;Khlaifia and Others v. Italy [GC], no 16483/12, ECHR 2016;Sharifi and Others v. Italy and Greece, no 16643/09, 21 October 2014;Shioshvili and Others v. Russia, no 19356/07, 20 December 2016
Hearing: Natsvlishvili and Togonidze v. Georgia (no. 9043/05) (Chamber hearing, 2013-10-15 00:00:00)
Case: NATSVLISHVILI AND TOGONIDZE v. GEORGIA
Document type: DECISIONS
Articles of the Convention concerned: 3, 5, 5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 6, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3-a, 6-3-b, 13, 34, 35, P1-1, P7-2
Conclusion: Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible
Hearing: Natsvlishvili and Togonidze v. Georgia (no. 9043/05) (Chamber hearing, 2013-10-15 00:00:00)
Case: CASE OF NATSVLISHVILI AND TOGONIDZE v. GEORGIA
Document type: CHAMBER
Document date: 2014-04-29 00:00:00
Articles of the Convention concerned: 6, 6-1, 6-2, 34, P1-1, P1-1-1, P7-2
Issue: Articles 679-3 §§ 1, 3, 4, 5 and 6, 679-4 § 5 and 679-7 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CCP)
Conclusion: No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);No violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 7 - Right of appeal in criminal matters (Article 2 of Protocol No. 7 - Higher tribunal;Review of conviction;Review of sentence);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6-2 - Presumption of innocence);No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Deprivation of property);No violation of Article 34 - Individual applications (Article 34 - Hinder the exercise of the right of petition)
Strasbourg case-law cited: Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, § 105, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;Aksoy v. Turkey, 18 December 1996, § 105, Reports 1996-VI;Allenet de Ribemont v. France, 10 February 1995, § 35, Series A no. 308;Anguelov v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 45963/99, 14 December 2004;Babar Ahmad and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), nos. 24027/07, 11949/08 and 36742/08, ECHR 6 July 2010;Balenović v. Croatia (dec.), no. 28369/07, 30 September 2010;Daktaras v. Lithuania, no. 42095/98, ECHR 2000 X;Galstyan v. Armenia, no. 26986/03, § 125, 15 November 2007;Hermi v. Italy [GC], no. 18114/02, § 73, ECHR 2006 XII;Konstantin Markin v. Russia [GC], no. 30078/06, §§ 162-163, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Konstas v. Greece, no. 53466/07, 24 May 2011;Krombach v. France, no. 29731/96, § 96, ECHR 2001 II;Kurt v. Turkey, 25 May 1998, § 159, Reports 1998 III;Kuzmin v. Russia, no. 58939/00, §§ 51-63, 18 March 2010;Minelli v. Switzerland, 25 March 1983, § 37, Series A no. 62;Miroļubovs and Others v. Latvia, no. 798/05, § 68, 15 September 2009;Natsvlishvili and Togonidze v. Georgia (dec.), no. 9043/05, § 84, 25 June 2013;Ninn-Hansen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 28972/95, ECHR 1999 V;Poitrimol v. France, 23 November 1993, § 31, Series A no. 277-A;Ruciński v. Poland, no. 33198/04, § 12, 20 February 2007;Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, § 135, 17 September 2009;Shuvalov v. Estonia, no. 39820/08 and 14942/09, § 82, 29 May 2012;Slavcho Kostov v. Bulgaria, no. 28674/03, § 17, 27 November 2008
Hearing: Schatschaschwili v. Germany (no. 9154/10) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2015-03-04 00:00:00)
Case: CASE OF SCHATSCHASCHWILI v. GERMANY
Document type: CHAMBER
Document date: 2014-04-17 00:00:00
Articles of the Convention concerned: 6, 6+6-3-d, 6-1, 6-3, 6-3-d, 35
Issue: Article 168 (c) of the Code of Criminal Procedure
Conclusion: Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 6+6-3-d - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Equality of arms) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article 6-3 - Rights of defence;Article 6-3-d - Examination of witnesses)
Strasbourg case-law cited: Al-Khawaja and Tahery v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 26766/05 and 22228/06, § 118, ECHR 2011;Artner v. Austria, 28 August 1992, §§ 21-22, Series A no. 242 A;Asch v. Austria, 26 April 1991, § 28, Series A no. 203;D. v. Finland, no. 30542/04, § 41, 7 July 2009;De Lorenzo v. Italy (dec.), no. 69264/01, 12 February 2004;Doorson v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1996, § 70, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 II;Ellis and Simms v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 46099/06, § 81, 10 April 2012;Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, § 175, ECHR 2010;Gossa v. Poland, no. 47986/99, 9 January 2007;Haas v. Germany (dec.), no. 73047/01, 17 November 2005;Hümmer v. Germany, no. 26171/07, §§ 41 and 43, 19 July 2012;Lucà v. Italy, no. 33354/96, § 39, ECHR 2001 II;Mayali v. France, no. 69116/01, § 32, 14 June 2005;Pesukic v. Switzerland, no. 25088/07, §§ 49-50, 6 December 2012;Sadak and Others v. Turkey, nos. 29900/96, 29901/96, 29902/96 and 29903/96, § 67, ECHR 2001 VIII;Scheper v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 39209/02, 5 April 2005;Solakov v. “the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia”, no. 47023/99, § 57, ECHR 2001 X;Štefančič v. Slovenia, no. 18027/05, § 42, 25 October 2012;Taxquet v. Belgium [GC], no. 926/05, § 84, ECHR 2010
Hearing: Satakunnan Markkinapörssi Oy and Satamedia Oy v. Finland (no. 931/13) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2016-09-14 00:00:00)
Case: CASE OF SATAKUNNAN MARKKINAPORSSI OY AND SATAMEDIA OY v. FINLAND
Document type: CHAMBER
Document date: 2015-07-21 00:00:00
Articles of the Convention concerned: 6, 6-1, 10, 10-1, 10-2, 35, 41
Issue: Personal Data Act ; Act on the Public Disclosure and Confidentiality of Tax Information
Conclusion: Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression;Freedom to impart information);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
Strasbourg case-law cited: Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no. 39954/08, 7 February 2012;Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, § 58, ECHR 1999-III;Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13378/05, § 60, ECHR 2008;De Haes and Gijsels v. Belgium, 24 February 1997, § 37, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 I;E.B. v. France [GC], no. 43546/02, § 47, 22 January 2008, ECHR 2000-I;Barfod v. Denmark, 22 February 1989, § 28, Series A no. 149;Flinkkilä and Others v. Finland, no. 25576/04, § 81, 6 April 2010;Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, § 45, ECHR 1999-I;Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, ECHR 2000-VII;Janowski v. Poland [GC], no. 25716/94, ECHR 1999-I;Jersild v. Denmark, 23 September 1994, Series A no. 298;Koua Poirrez v. France, no. 40892/98, § 61, ECHR 2003 X;Lehideux and Isorni v. France, 23 September 1998, § 57, Reports 1998 VII;Lingens v. Austria, 8 July 1986, Series A no. 103;MGN Limited v. the United Kingdom, no. 39401/04, § 142, 18 January 2011;News Verlags GmbH & Co.KG v. Austria, no. 31457/96, § 52;Nilsen and Johnsen v. Norway [GC], no. 23118/93, § 43, ECHR 1999-VIII;Pafitis and Others v. Greece, 26 February 1998, § 95, Reports 1998 I;Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 1), 26 April 1979, § 62, Series A no. 30;Vallianatos and Others v. Greece [GC], nos. 29381/09 and 32684/09, § 72, ECHR 2013;Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos. 40660/08 and 60641/08, §§ 104-107, ECHR 2012;Von Hannover v. Germany, no. 59320/00, § 68, ECHR 2004 VI
External sources: Directive 95/46/EC