Study: NCT06661551

Intervention type: PROCEDURE
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: Miniscrew insertion in dynamic-computer guided surgery
Description: The intervention more executed in the literature is by using static computer-guided systems (s-CAS) . However, the s-CAS has limitations, including the time and cost associated with guide production, furthermore, the guide's bulk prevents its use in patients with limited mouth opening, and reduced irrigation potentially leads to overheating and bone burns during implant placement. Additionally, the inability to adjust the surgical plan intraoperatively, the lack of real-time visualization during implant site preparation and implant insertion, and the requirement for specific surgical kits for each implant system present further challenges.~Dynamic navigation systems offer several benefits as highlighted in the literature, including: real-time feedback of the position of surgical drill or implant, allowing intraoperative changes adjusting the implant position during the surgery, reduction of risk of injury to adjacent anatomical structures, promotion of accuracy in novices

Intervention type: PROCEDURE
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: Miniscrew insertion in dynamic-computer guided surgery
Description: The intervention more executed in the literature is by using static computer-guided systems (s-CAS) . However, the s-CAS has limitations, including the time and cost associated with guide production, furthermore, the guide's bulk prevents its use in patients with limited mouth opening, and reduced irrigation potentially leads to overheating and bone burns during implant placement. Additionally, the inability to adjust the surgical plan intraoperatively, the lack of real-time visualization during implant site preparation and implant insertion, and the requirement for specific surgical kits for each implant system present further challenges.~Dynamic navigation systems offer several benefits as highlighted in the literature, including: real-time feedback of the position of surgical drill or implant, allowing intraoperative changes adjusting the implant position during the surgery, reduction of risk of injury to adjacent anatomical structures, promotion of accuracy in novices

Intervention type: PROCEDURE
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: Miniscrew insertion in dynamic-computer guided surgery
Description: The intervention more executed in the literature is by using static computer-guided systems (s-CAS) . However, the s-CAS has limitations, including the time and cost associated with guide production, furthermore, the guide's bulk prevents its use in patients with limited mouth opening, and reduced irrigation potentially leads to overheating and bone burns during implant placement. Additionally, the inability to adjust the surgical plan intraoperatively, the lack of real-time visualization during implant site preparation and implant insertion, and the requirement for specific surgical kits for each implant system present further challenges.~Dynamic navigation systems offer several benefits as highlighted in the literature, including: real-time feedback of the position of surgical drill or implant, allowing intraoperative changes adjusting the implant position during the surgery, reduction of risk of injury to adjacent anatomical structures, promotion of accuracy in novices