Study: NCT06312631

Intervention type: DEVICE
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: Putting on the gripping glove
Description: taking measurements and putting the gripping glove on the patient

Intervention type: DEVICE
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: Putting on the gripping glove
Description: taking measurements and putting the gripping glove on the patient

Intervention type: DEVICE
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: Putting on the gripping glove
Description: taking measurements and putting the gripping glove on the patient

Intervention type: DEVICE
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: Putting on the gripping glove
Description: taking measurements and putting the gripping glove on the patient

Intervention type: DEVICE
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: Putting on the gripping glove
Description: taking measurements and putting the gripping glove on the patient

Intervention type: DEVICE
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: Putting on the gripping glove
Description: taking measurements and putting the gripping glove on the patient

Intervention type: DEVICE
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: Putting on the gripping glove
Description: taking measurements and putting the gripping glove on the patient

Intervention type: DEVICE
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: Putting on the gripping glove
Description: taking measurements and putting the gripping glove on the patient

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: ULPA questionnaire
Description: The evaluation of the effectiveness of the gripping glove on the performance of the upper limb in daily life will be evaluated using the ULPA score.~The investigator asks the patient to perform a task and the ULPA collects the total number of errors made by the patient (inability/omission, imprecision, repetition, time to complete the task)

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: ULPA questionnaire
Description: The evaluation of the effectiveness of the gripping glove on the performance of the upper limb in daily life will be evaluated using the ULPA score.~The investigator asks the patient to perform a task and the ULPA collects the total number of errors made by the patient (inability/omission, imprecision, repetition, time to complete the task)

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: ULPA questionnaire
Description: The evaluation of the effectiveness of the gripping glove on the performance of the upper limb in daily life will be evaluated using the ULPA score.~The investigator asks the patient to perform a task and the ULPA collects the total number of errors made by the patient (inability/omission, imprecision, repetition, time to complete the task)

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: ULPA questionnaire
Description: The evaluation of the effectiveness of the gripping glove on the performance of the upper limb in daily life will be evaluated using the ULPA score.~The investigator asks the patient to perform a task and the ULPA collects the total number of errors made by the patient (inability/omission, imprecision, repetition, time to complete the task)

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: ULPA questionnaire
Description: The evaluation of the effectiveness of the gripping glove on the performance of the upper limb in daily life will be evaluated using the ULPA score.~The investigator asks the patient to perform a task and the ULPA collects the total number of errors made by the patient (inability/omission, imprecision, repetition, time to complete the task)

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: ULPA questionnaire
Description: The evaluation of the effectiveness of the gripping glove on the performance of the upper limb in daily life will be evaluated using the ULPA score.~The investigator asks the patient to perform a task and the ULPA collects the total number of errors made by the patient (inability/omission, imprecision, repetition, time to complete the task)

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: ULPA questionnaire
Description: The evaluation of the effectiveness of the gripping glove on the performance of the upper limb in daily life will be evaluated using the ULPA score.~The investigator asks the patient to perform a task and the ULPA collects the total number of errors made by the patient (inability/omission, imprecision, repetition, time to complete the task)

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: ULPA questionnaire
Description: The evaluation of the effectiveness of the gripping glove on the performance of the upper limb in daily life will be evaluated using the ULPA score.~The investigator asks the patient to perform a task and the ULPA collects the total number of errors made by the patient (inability/omission, imprecision, repetition, time to complete the task)

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: Motor Activity Log (MAL) Questionnaire
Description: The MAL is a self-assessment of the integration of the upper limb into daily life. This measurement allows a quantified evaluation of the perceived performance of the use of the upper limb in the actions of daily life.~The patient will answer 30 questions about daily life and for each item, rate the quantity from 0 to 5: 0 = never uses the hemiplegic arm and 5 = uses as much as before the accident

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: Motor Activity Log (MAL) Questionnaire
Description: The MAL is a self-assessment of the integration of the upper limb into daily life. This measurement allows a quantified evaluation of the perceived performance of the use of the upper limb in the actions of daily life.~The patient will answer 30 questions about daily life and for each item, rate the quantity from 0 to 5: 0 = never uses the hemiplegic arm and 5 = uses as much as before the accident

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: Motor Activity Log (MAL) Questionnaire
Description: The MAL is a self-assessment of the integration of the upper limb into daily life. This measurement allows a quantified evaluation of the perceived performance of the use of the upper limb in the actions of daily life.~The patient will answer 30 questions about daily life and for each item, rate the quantity from 0 to 5: 0 = never uses the hemiplegic arm and 5 = uses as much as before the accident

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: Motor Activity Log (MAL) Questionnaire
Description: The MAL is a self-assessment of the integration of the upper limb into daily life. This measurement allows a quantified evaluation of the perceived performance of the use of the upper limb in the actions of daily life.~The patient will answer 30 questions about daily life and for each item, rate the quantity from 0 to 5: 0 = never uses the hemiplegic arm and 5 = uses as much as before the accident

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: Motor Activity Log (MAL) Questionnaire
Description: The MAL is a self-assessment of the integration of the upper limb into daily life. This measurement allows a quantified evaluation of the perceived performance of the use of the upper limb in the actions of daily life.~The patient will answer 30 questions about daily life and for each item, rate the quantity from 0 to 5: 0 = never uses the hemiplegic arm and 5 = uses as much as before the accident

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: Motor Activity Log (MAL) Questionnaire
Description: The MAL is a self-assessment of the integration of the upper limb into daily life. This measurement allows a quantified evaluation of the perceived performance of the use of the upper limb in the actions of daily life.~The patient will answer 30 questions about daily life and for each item, rate the quantity from 0 to 5: 0 = never uses the hemiplegic arm and 5 = uses as much as before the accident

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: Motor Activity Log (MAL) Questionnaire
Description: The MAL is a self-assessment of the integration of the upper limb into daily life. This measurement allows a quantified evaluation of the perceived performance of the use of the upper limb in the actions of daily life.~The patient will answer 30 questions about daily life and for each item, rate the quantity from 0 to 5: 0 = never uses the hemiplegic arm and 5 = uses as much as before the accident

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: Motor Activity Log (MAL) Questionnaire
Description: The MAL is a self-assessment of the integration of the upper limb into daily life. This measurement allows a quantified evaluation of the perceived performance of the use of the upper limb in the actions of daily life.~The patient will answer 30 questions about daily life and for each item, rate the quantity from 0 to 5: 0 = never uses the hemiplegic arm and 5 = uses as much as before the accident

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) questionnaire
Description: This questionnaire assesses the motor selectivity of the upper limb. Several questions are asked about the movements that the patient can perform and to each question, the patient can answer either 0 (minimum) and 2 (maximum).

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) questionnaire
Description: This questionnaire assesses the motor selectivity of the upper limb. Several questions are asked about the movements that the patient can perform and to each question, the patient can answer either 0 (minimum) and 2 (maximum).

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) questionnaire
Description: This questionnaire assesses the motor selectivity of the upper limb. Several questions are asked about the movements that the patient can perform and to each question, the patient can answer either 0 (minimum) and 2 (maximum).

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) questionnaire
Description: This questionnaire assesses the motor selectivity of the upper limb. Several questions are asked about the movements that the patient can perform and to each question, the patient can answer either 0 (minimum) and 2 (maximum).

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) questionnaire
Description: This questionnaire assesses the motor selectivity of the upper limb. Several questions are asked about the movements that the patient can perform and to each question, the patient can answer either 0 (minimum) and 2 (maximum).

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) questionnaire
Description: This questionnaire assesses the motor selectivity of the upper limb. Several questions are asked about the movements that the patient can perform and to each question, the patient can answer either 0 (minimum) and 2 (maximum).

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) questionnaire
Description: This questionnaire assesses the motor selectivity of the upper limb. Several questions are asked about the movements that the patient can perform and to each question, the patient can answer either 0 (minimum) and 2 (maximum).

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) questionnaire
Description: This questionnaire assesses the motor selectivity of the upper limb. Several questions are asked about the movements that the patient can perform and to each question, the patient can answer either 0 (minimum) and 2 (maximum).

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: Score Action Arm Research Test
Description: This questionnaire evaluates 4 different actions: Grasping an object (6 different objects to grasp), holding an object (4 different objects), pinching an object (6 different objects) and the overall movements made by the patient (3 different overall movements).~For each item, each object or each movement evaluated, the patient must rate the task on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=cannot perform any part of the test and 3=performs the test normally)

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: Score Action Arm Research Test
Description: This questionnaire evaluates 4 different actions: Grasping an object (6 different objects to grasp), holding an object (4 different objects), pinching an object (6 different objects) and the overall movements made by the patient (3 different overall movements).~For each item, each object or each movement evaluated, the patient must rate the task on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=cannot perform any part of the test and 3=performs the test normally)

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: Score Action Arm Research Test
Description: This questionnaire evaluates 4 different actions: Grasping an object (6 different objects to grasp), holding an object (4 different objects), pinching an object (6 different objects) and the overall movements made by the patient (3 different overall movements).~For each item, each object or each movement evaluated, the patient must rate the task on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=cannot perform any part of the test and 3=performs the test normally)

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: Score Action Arm Research Test
Description: This questionnaire evaluates 4 different actions: Grasping an object (6 different objects to grasp), holding an object (4 different objects), pinching an object (6 different objects) and the overall movements made by the patient (3 different overall movements).~For each item, each object or each movement evaluated, the patient must rate the task on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=cannot perform any part of the test and 3=performs the test normally)

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: Score Action Arm Research Test
Description: This questionnaire evaluates 4 different actions: Grasping an object (6 different objects to grasp), holding an object (4 different objects), pinching an object (6 different objects) and the overall movements made by the patient (3 different overall movements).~For each item, each object or each movement evaluated, the patient must rate the task on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=cannot perform any part of the test and 3=performs the test normally)

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: Score Action Arm Research Test
Description: This questionnaire evaluates 4 different actions: Grasping an object (6 different objects to grasp), holding an object (4 different objects), pinching an object (6 different objects) and the overall movements made by the patient (3 different overall movements).~For each item, each object or each movement evaluated, the patient must rate the task on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=cannot perform any part of the test and 3=performs the test normally)

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: Score Action Arm Research Test
Description: This questionnaire evaluates 4 different actions: Grasping an object (6 different objects to grasp), holding an object (4 different objects), pinching an object (6 different objects) and the overall movements made by the patient (3 different overall movements).~For each item, each object or each movement evaluated, the patient must rate the task on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=cannot perform any part of the test and 3=performs the test normally)

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: Score Action Arm Research Test
Description: This questionnaire evaluates 4 different actions: Grasping an object (6 different objects to grasp), holding an object (4 different objects), pinching an object (6 different objects) and the overall movements made by the patient (3 different overall movements).~For each item, each object or each movement evaluated, the patient must rate the task on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=cannot perform any part of the test and 3=performs the test normally)

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: EuroQol five-level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire
Description: This questionnaire assesses the patient's state of health. 5 items are proposed (mobility, autonomy, current activity, pain, anxiety) and for each the patient must check one of the 5 propositions (no problem, mild problems, moderate problems, severe problems, incapable). The patient must also rate their state of health on a scale of 0 to 100.

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: EuroQol five-level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire
Description: This questionnaire assesses the patient's state of health. 5 items are proposed (mobility, autonomy, current activity, pain, anxiety) and for each the patient must check one of the 5 propositions (no problem, mild problems, moderate problems, severe problems, incapable). The patient must also rate their state of health on a scale of 0 to 100.

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: EuroQol five-level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire
Description: This questionnaire assesses the patient's state of health. 5 items are proposed (mobility, autonomy, current activity, pain, anxiety) and for each the patient must check one of the 5 propositions (no problem, mild problems, moderate problems, severe problems, incapable). The patient must also rate their state of health on a scale of 0 to 100.

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: EuroQol five-level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire
Description: This questionnaire assesses the patient's state of health. 5 items are proposed (mobility, autonomy, current activity, pain, anxiety) and for each the patient must check one of the 5 propositions (no problem, mild problems, moderate problems, severe problems, incapable). The patient must also rate their state of health on a scale of 0 to 100.

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: EuroQol five-level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire
Description: This questionnaire assesses the patient's state of health. 5 items are proposed (mobility, autonomy, current activity, pain, anxiety) and for each the patient must check one of the 5 propositions (no problem, mild problems, moderate problems, severe problems, incapable). The patient must also rate their state of health on a scale of 0 to 100.

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: EuroQol five-level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire
Description: This questionnaire assesses the patient's state of health. 5 items are proposed (mobility, autonomy, current activity, pain, anxiety) and for each the patient must check one of the 5 propositions (no problem, mild problems, moderate problems, severe problems, incapable). The patient must also rate their state of health on a scale of 0 to 100.

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: EuroQol five-level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire
Description: This questionnaire assesses the patient's state of health. 5 items are proposed (mobility, autonomy, current activity, pain, anxiety) and for each the patient must check one of the 5 propositions (no problem, mild problems, moderate problems, severe problems, incapable). The patient must also rate their state of health on a scale of 0 to 100.

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: EuroQol five-level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire
Description: This questionnaire assesses the patient's state of health. 5 items are proposed (mobility, autonomy, current activity, pain, anxiety) and for each the patient must check one of the 5 propositions (no problem, mild problems, moderate problems, severe problems, incapable). The patient must also rate their state of health on a scale of 0 to 100.

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology
Description: This questionnaire assesses satisfaction with the technical aid (here the gripping glove) and the related services. The technique and related services will be evaluated by items provided to the patient and he will have to rate for each of them a score between 1 and 5 (1 = not satisfied at all and 5 = very satisfied)

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology
Description: This questionnaire assesses satisfaction with the technical aid (here the gripping glove) and the related services. The technique and related services will be evaluated by items provided to the patient and he will have to rate for each of them a score between 1 and 5 (1 = not satisfied at all and 5 = very satisfied)

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: EXPERIMENTAL
Intervention: Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology
Description: This questionnaire assesses satisfaction with the technical aid (here the gripping glove) and the related services. The technique and related services will be evaluated by items provided to the patient and he will have to rate for each of them a score between 1 and 5 (1 = not satisfied at all and 5 = very satisfied)