Study: NCT06779448

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
Intervention: Evaluation of objective and subjective stress parameters caused by local anesthesia during treatments
Description: Patients were divided according to the randomization procedure. infiltration anesthesia (Maxicaine Forte, Artikain, VEM Drug, Turkey) was performed with a 20-gauge needle. Following the administration of anesthetic, an appropriate size rubber dam and metal clamp was placed i and pit and fissure sealant was applied. The stress parameters of the subjects were recorded at three measurement points. At the conclusion of the treatment, pain perception was evaluated subjectively using the WBFPRS and VAS.

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
Intervention: Evaluation of objective and subjective stress parameters caused by local anesthesia during treatments
Description: Patients were divided according to the randomization procedure. infiltration anesthesia (Maxicaine Forte, Artikain, VEM Drug, Turkey) was performed with a 20-gauge needle. Following the administration of anesthetic, an appropriate size rubber dam and metal clamp was placed i and pit and fissure sealant was applied. The stress parameters of the subjects were recorded at three measurement points. At the conclusion of the treatment, pain perception was evaluated subjectively using the WBFPRS and VAS.

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
Intervention: Evaluation of objective and subjective stress parameters caused by local anesthesia during treatments
Description: Patients were divided according to the randomization procedure. infiltration anesthesia (Maxicaine Forte, Artikain, VEM Drug, Turkey) was performed with a 20-gauge needle. Following the administration of anesthetic, an appropriate size rubber dam and metal clamp was placed i and pit and fissure sealant was applied. The stress parameters of the subjects were recorded at three measurement points. At the conclusion of the treatment, pain perception was evaluated subjectively using the WBFPRS and VAS.

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
Intervention: Evaluation of objective and subjective stress parameters caused by topical anesthesia during treatments
Description: Patients were divided i according to the randomization procedure. The topical anesthetic agent (EMLA, AstraZeneca, Cotia, São Paulo, Brazil) was applied using a disposable dental Q-tip for 10-20 seconds. Following the administration of anesthetic, an appropriate size rubber dam and metal clamp was placed i and pit and fissure sealant was applied. The stress parameters of the subjects were recorded at three measurement points. At the conclusion of the treatment, pain perception was evaluated subjectively using the WBFPRS and VAS.

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
Intervention: Evaluation of objective and subjective stress parameters caused by topical anesthesia during treatments
Description: Patients were divided i according to the randomization procedure. The topical anesthetic agent (EMLA, AstraZeneca, Cotia, São Paulo, Brazil) was applied using a disposable dental Q-tip for 10-20 seconds. Following the administration of anesthetic, an appropriate size rubber dam and metal clamp was placed i and pit and fissure sealant was applied. The stress parameters of the subjects were recorded at three measurement points. At the conclusion of the treatment, pain perception was evaluated subjectively using the WBFPRS and VAS.

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
Intervention: Evaluation of objective and subjective stress parameters caused by topical anesthesia during treatments
Description: Patients were divided i according to the randomization procedure. The topical anesthetic agent (EMLA, AstraZeneca, Cotia, São Paulo, Brazil) was applied using a disposable dental Q-tip for 10-20 seconds. Following the administration of anesthetic, an appropriate size rubber dam and metal clamp was placed i and pit and fissure sealant was applied. The stress parameters of the subjects were recorded at three measurement points. At the conclusion of the treatment, pain perception was evaluated subjectively using the WBFPRS and VAS.

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
Intervention: Evaluation of objective and subjective stress parameters caused by topical anesthesia during treatments
Description: Patients were divided i according to the randomization procedure. The topical anesthetic agent (EMLA, AstraZeneca, Cotia, São Paulo, Brazil) was applied using a disposable dental Q-tip for 10-20 seconds. Following the administration of anesthetic, an appropriate size rubber dam and metal clamp was placed i and pit and fissure sealant was applied. The stress parameters of the subjects were recorded at three measurement points. At the conclusion of the treatment, pain perception was evaluated subjectively using the WBFPRS and VAS.

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
Intervention: Evaluation of objective and subjective stress parameters caused by the application of rubber dam during treatments in the patient and dentist
Description: Patients were divided into 4 subgroups according to the randomization procedure: topical anesthesia and infiltrative anesthesia before the placement of the clamp and also cotton roll application other side of the arch. The topical anesthetic agent (EMLA, AstraZeneca, Cotia, São Paulo, Brazil) was applied using a disposable dental Q-tip for 10-20 seconds and infiltration anesthesia (Maxicaine Forte, Artikain, VEM Drug, Turkey) was performed with a 20-gauge needle. Following the administration of anesthetics, an appropriate size rubber dam and metal clamp was placed in the mandibular arch, and pit and fissure sealant was applied to the opposite arch. The stress parameters of the subjects and dentist were recorded at three measurement points. At the conclusion of the treatment, pain perception was evaluated subjectively using the WBFPRS and VAS.

Intervention type: OTHER
Group type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
Intervention: Evaluation of objective and subjective stress parameters caused by the application of rubber dam during treatments in the patient and dentist
Description: Patients were divided into 4 subgroups according to the randomization procedure: topical anesthesia and infiltrative anesthesia before the placement of the clamp and also cotton roll application other side of the arch. The topical anesthetic agent (EMLA, AstraZeneca, Cotia, São Paulo, Brazil) was applied using a disposable dental Q-tip for 10-20 seconds and infiltration anesthesia (Maxicaine Forte, Artikain, VEM Drug, Turkey) was performed with a 20-gauge needle. Following the administration of anesthetics, an appropriate size rubber dam and metal clamp was placed in the mandibular arch, and pit and fissure sealant was applied to the opposite arch. The stress parameters of the subjects and dentist were recorded at three measurement points. At the conclusion of the treatment, pain perception was evaluated subjectively using the WBFPRS and VAS.