Study: NCT05893524

Intervention type: DIAGNOSTIC_TEST
Intervention: Timed Up-and-Go (TUG single-task)
Description: The TUG test is a well-established clinical test of one mobility sequence: rising from an armchair, walking straight ahead, passing a line marked on the floor, turning around, walking back, and sitting down again.

Intervention type: DIAGNOSTIC_TEST
Intervention: Timed Up-and-Go (TUG single-task)
Description: The TUG test is a well-established clinical test of one mobility sequence: rising from an armchair, walking straight ahead, passing a line marked on the floor, turning around, walking back, and sitting down again.

Intervention type: DIAGNOSTIC_TEST
Intervention: Timed Up-and-Go (TUG single-task)
Description: The TUG test is a well-established clinical test of one mobility sequence: rising from an armchair, walking straight ahead, passing a line marked on the floor, turning around, walking back, and sitting down again.

Intervention type: DIAGNOSTIC_TEST
Intervention: Timed Up-and-Go (TUG single-task)
Description: The TUG test is a well-established clinical test of one mobility sequence: rising from an armchair, walking straight ahead, passing a line marked on the floor, turning around, walking back, and sitting down again.

Intervention type: DIAGNOSTIC_TEST
Intervention: Timed Up-and-Go dual-task (TUGdt)
Description: Two dual-task tests including TUG (TUGdt) were carried out: TUGdt naming animals and TUGdt months backwards. The outcomes registered were: time scores for TUG single-task and both TUGdt tests, TUGdt costs (relative time difference between TUG single-task and TUGdt), number of different animals named, number of months recited in correct order, number of animals per 10 s, and number of months per 10 s.

Intervention type: DIAGNOSTIC_TEST
Intervention: Timed Up-and-Go dual-task (TUGdt)
Description: Two dual-task tests including TUG (TUGdt) were carried out: TUGdt naming animals and TUGdt months backwards. The outcomes registered were: time scores for TUG single-task and both TUGdt tests, TUGdt costs (relative time difference between TUG single-task and TUGdt), number of different animals named, number of months recited in correct order, number of animals per 10 s, and number of months per 10 s.

Intervention type: DIAGNOSTIC_TEST
Intervention: Timed Up-and-Go dual-task (TUGdt)
Description: Two dual-task tests including TUG (TUGdt) were carried out: TUGdt naming animals and TUGdt months backwards. The outcomes registered were: time scores for TUG single-task and both TUGdt tests, TUGdt costs (relative time difference between TUG single-task and TUGdt), number of different animals named, number of months recited in correct order, number of animals per 10 s, and number of months per 10 s.

Intervention type: DIAGNOSTIC_TEST
Intervention: Timed Up-and-Go dual-task (TUGdt)
Description: Two dual-task tests including TUG (TUGdt) were carried out: TUGdt naming animals and TUGdt months backwards. The outcomes registered were: time scores for TUG single-task and both TUGdt tests, TUGdt costs (relative time difference between TUG single-task and TUGdt), number of different animals named, number of months recited in correct order, number of animals per 10 s, and number of months per 10 s.

Intervention type: DIAGNOSTIC_TEST
Intervention: Clinical functional assessment
Description: The diagnostic procedure was part of the clinical routine for patients undergoing memory assessment and involved a geriatrician's careful evaluation of the patient's history and cognitive testing including Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Clock Drawing Test, Verbal Fluency Test, and Trail Making Test A and B. In addition, all participants carried out short versions of the Geriatric Depression Scale and the General Motor Function Assessment Scale, as well as static balance according to the Bohannon Method, and hand grip strength using a dynamometer.

Intervention type: DIAGNOSTIC_TEST
Intervention: Clinical functional assessment
Description: The diagnostic procedure was part of the clinical routine for patients undergoing memory assessment and involved a geriatrician's careful evaluation of the patient's history and cognitive testing including Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Clock Drawing Test, Verbal Fluency Test, and Trail Making Test A and B. In addition, all participants carried out short versions of the Geriatric Depression Scale and the General Motor Function Assessment Scale, as well as static balance according to the Bohannon Method, and hand grip strength using a dynamometer.

Intervention type: DIAGNOSTIC_TEST
Intervention: Clinical functional assessment
Description: The diagnostic procedure was part of the clinical routine for patients undergoing memory assessment and involved a geriatrician's careful evaluation of the patient's history and cognitive testing including Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Clock Drawing Test, Verbal Fluency Test, and Trail Making Test A and B. In addition, all participants carried out short versions of the Geriatric Depression Scale and the General Motor Function Assessment Scale, as well as static balance according to the Bohannon Method, and hand grip strength using a dynamometer.

Intervention type: DIAGNOSTIC_TEST
Intervention: Clinical functional assessment
Description: The diagnostic procedure was part of the clinical routine for patients undergoing memory assessment and involved a geriatrician's careful evaluation of the patient's history and cognitive testing including Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Clock Drawing Test, Verbal Fluency Test, and Trail Making Test A and B. In addition, all participants carried out short versions of the Geriatric Depression Scale and the General Motor Function Assessment Scale, as well as static balance according to the Bohannon Method, and hand grip strength using a dynamometer.