Study: NCT02906501

Intervention type: PROCEDURE
Intervention: The Penn Web-Based Computerized Neurocognitive Battery
Description: The Battery (PennCNP) of the Brain Behavior Laboratory at the University of Pennsylvania offers a range of probes of human neuropsychological functioning . It was designed for neuropsychological measurement of major cognitive domains. The WebCNP is administered using clickable icons on desktop or laptop computers, in a fixed order. Administrating the tests in a standard fashion fostering optimal performance without aiding the participant is required. For each domain, accuracy and speed are computed. Full battery completion takes approximately 2 hours. Each test begins with a practice module, to assure understanding of the instructions.

Intervention type: PROCEDURE
Intervention: The Penn Web-Based Computerized Neurocognitive Battery
Description: The Battery (PennCNP) of the Brain Behavior Laboratory at the University of Pennsylvania offers a range of probes of human neuropsychological functioning . It was designed for neuropsychological measurement of major cognitive domains. The WebCNP is administered using clickable icons on desktop or laptop computers, in a fixed order. Administrating the tests in a standard fashion fostering optimal performance without aiding the participant is required. For each domain, accuracy and speed are computed. Full battery completion takes approximately 2 hours. Each test begins with a practice module, to assure understanding of the instructions.

Intervention type: PROCEDURE
Intervention: The Iowa Gambling Test (IGT)
Description: The essential feature of this task is that it mimics real-life situations in the way it factors uncertainty, reward and punishment. The task involves four decks of cards, named A, B, C and D. The goal is to maximize profit on a loan of play money. Subjects are required to make a series of 100 card selections, but are not told ahead of time how many card selections they are going to be allowed to make. Cards can be selected one at a time, from any deck, and subjects are free to switch from any deck to another, at any time and as often as they wish. The decision to select from one deck or another is largely influenced by schedules of reward and punishment. These schedules are pre-programmed and known to the examiner, but not to the subject (Bechara et al., 1994, 1999a).

Intervention type: PROCEDURE
Intervention: The Iowa Gambling Test (IGT)
Description: The essential feature of this task is that it mimics real-life situations in the way it factors uncertainty, reward and punishment. The task involves four decks of cards, named A, B, C and D. The goal is to maximize profit on a loan of play money. Subjects are required to make a series of 100 card selections, but are not told ahead of time how many card selections they are going to be allowed to make. Cards can be selected one at a time, from any deck, and subjects are free to switch from any deck to another, at any time and as often as they wish. The decision to select from one deck or another is largely influenced by schedules of reward and punishment. These schedules are pre-programmed and known to the examiner, but not to the subject (Bechara et al., 1994, 1999a).

Intervention type: PROCEDURE
Intervention: The Iowa Gambling Test (IGT)
Description: The essential feature of this task is that it mimics real-life situations in the way it factors uncertainty, reward and punishment. The task involves four decks of cards, named A, B, C and D. The goal is to maximize profit on a loan of play money. Subjects are required to make a series of 100 card selections, but are not told ahead of time how many card selections they are going to be allowed to make. Cards can be selected one at a time, from any deck, and subjects are free to switch from any deck to another, at any time and as often as they wish. The decision to select from one deck or another is largely influenced by schedules of reward and punishment. These schedules are pre-programmed and known to the examiner, but not to the subject (Bechara et al., 1994, 1999a).