TrialPanorama/Dataset huggingface dataset:
Please select the eligibility criteria that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: PICO Versus Standard Dressing on Groin Incisions After Vascular Surgery - a Prospective Randomized Trial (INVIPS Trial)
Brief Summary: The wound infection rate in the groin after vascular surgery has been denoted to be high since the wound surveillance register started in 2005. The current wound infection rate based on a validation study was 22.9% (24/105 patients with groin incision(s) between 1 March to 30 June in 2012). This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate if negative pressure wound therapy on closed inguinal incisions (INPWT) after vascular surgical procedures can reduce the risk for surgical site infections and other wound complications.


Options:
A: Inclusion Criteria:

* Patients 18 years of age and above
* Elective vascular surgery
* Inguinal incision (transverse or longitudinal)
* Capable of understanding the study information and giving written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

* Emergency surgery
* Ongoing infection in inguinal area
B: Inclusion Criteria:

* Written informed consent
* Coronary heart disease patients to transplant more than 2 vascular bridge
* The thigh groin following from the saphenous vein

Exclusion Criteria:

* Subjects does not agree to participate in clinical trials
* Subjects had a injury, operation history of Thigh
* Subjects having ever received chemotherapy before the surgery
* Subjects with known hypersensitivity to components of the surgical sticky membrane
C: Inclusion Criteria:

* Written informed consent
* Post-surgical subcutaneous abdominal wound healing impairment
* Minimum wound size eligible for the application of the randomized treatment- Inclusion, randomization, adequate wound pre-treatment (Debridement) and start of therapy within 48 hours after reopening of the wound, diagnosis for nonclosable wound or in case of spontaneous wound dehiscence

Exclusion Criteria:

* Age \< 18
* Noncompliance with study procedures, visit schedule and follow up
* Pregnancy
* Present or nonclosable defect of the abdominal fascia
* Any pre-existing or ongoing organ system failure, that cannot be stabilized or solved by appropriate medical treatment
* Necrotic tissue with eschar present
* Non-enteric and unexplored fistulas
* Malignancy of the wound
* Use of any other device based on the principle of negative pressure wound therapy on the study wound within ≤ 8 days prior to screening
* Competing therapies or procedures
* Simultaneous participation in other clinical trials
D: Inclusion Criteria:

* Patients that have undergone cesarean section for delivery; have a BMI greater or equal to 35. All cases of cesarean section including primary and repeat, scheduled and urgent.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Patients who deliver vaginally; age less than 18 years old; silver allergy; non-English speaking

Answer: A
Please select the eligibility criteria that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: The Effectiveness of a Comprehensive School Health Intervention in Improving Healthy Eating and Physical Activity and Preventing Childhood Obesity
Brief Summary: The objectives were to 1) make students eat healthier and be more active; and 2) prevent overweight and obesity. Children will therefore be less likely overweight or obese. Beginning in January 2008, the Alberta Project Promoting active Living and healthy Eating in Schools (APPLE Schools) was implemented in 10 schools throughout the Canadian Province, Alberta. Full-time School Health Facilitators were placed in each of the schools to implement what is know in Canada as Comprehensive School Health (CSH). In the United States, CSH is more commonly referred to as "Coordinated School Health", while the synonymous term "Health Promoting Schools" is often used in Australia and Europe. The project was evaluated annually in the spring from 2008 to 2011 and as of 2009 evaluations included the use of time-stamped pedometers. The comparison group included approximately 150 schools that were randomly selected to reflect the population of Alberta, Canada. Twenty of these randomly selected schools also participated in data collection which involved the use of time-stamped pedometers.


Options:
A: Inclusion Criteria:

Child in pre-school class in schools in disadvantaged areas

Exclusion Criteria:

None
B: Inclusion Criteria:

Intervention Schools:

* school located in a socioeconomically disadvantaged neighbourhood and a demonstrated need for health promotion
* Grade five students with parent consent, who also assented to participate were included in annual evaluations

Control Schools:

* Grade five students with parent consent, who also assented to participate were included in annual evaluations

Exclusion Criteria:

Intervention \& Control Schools:

* Schools that did not receive jurisdictional approval to participate
* Grade five students who did not receive parent consent or did not provide their assent were not included in annual evaluations
C: Inclusion Criteria:

* 2nd and 3rd grade students

Exclusion Criteria:

* Students who are confined to a wheel chair, blind, or intellectually disadvantaged may be unable perform tests for cardiovascular fitness or MVPA using accelerometers
D: Inclusion Criteria:

* 11-13 years old
* school-going
* willing to participate

Exclusion Criteria:

* pregnant
* severe medical/physical disorder

Answer: B
Please select the eligibility criteria that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: A Community-Academic Partnership to Address Disparities in Obesity Among Youth
Brief Summary: Objectives: We conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of Students for Nutrition and eXercise (SNaX), a middle-school-based obesity-prevention intervention combining school-wide environmental changes, multimedia, encouragement to eat healthy school cafeteria foods, and peer-led education and marketing.

Methods: We randomly selected schools from the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) and assigned five to the intervention group and five to a wait-list control group. School records were obtained for number of fruits and vegetables served, students served lunch, and snacks sold per attending student. Pre- and post-intervention surveys assessed psychosocial variables among 2,997 seventh-graders (75% of all seventh-graders across schools).

Hypotheses: For the RCT of SNaX, we hypothesized that SNaX would lead to increases in the proportion of students served in the cafeteria (because SNaX markets cafeterias' healthy foods); increased fruit and vegetable servings (because SNaX increases access to sliced/bite-sized fruits and vegetables); decreased school store snack sales; and greater water consumption. We also hypothesized that SNaX would lead to more positive attitudes about the cafeteria and water, improve obesity-prevention knowledge, and increase intentions to drink water.


Options:
A: Inclusion Criteria:

* schools with \>50% NSLP-eligible students (a proxy for low-income) and \<900 - seventh-graders

Exclusion Criteria:

* schools with \<50% NSLP-eligible students and \>900 seventh-graders
B: Inclusion Criteria:

* 9th or 10th grade students as participants
* 11th or 12th grade students as mentors
* Classroom teachers who instruct health education or physical education to 9th and 10th grade students.
* Not expected to move from school prior to conclusion of study
* Speaks English

Exclusion Criteria:

* Peer mentors with a BMI (for age and gender) above the 85th percentile or below the 5th percentile at the start of the study
C: Inclusion Criteria:

* 5th- 6th- and 7th-grade girls (ages 9-14; 8th-graders if needed in middle schools having only 7th- and 8th- grades)
* Available and willing to participate in PA Club 3 days/wk. for 17wks.
* Available for follow-up (9 mos. after intervention ends)
* Agree to random assignment
* Able to read, understand, and speak English.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Involved in or planning to be involved in school or community sports or other organized PAs, such as dance lessons, that involve MVPA and require participation 3 or more days/wk. after school during every season of the school year
* A health condition precluding safe MVPA.
D: Inclusion Criteria:

* Enrolled in the 6th or 7th grade at the target school.
* Parent consent and child assent to participate.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Taking medications for weight control.

Answer: A
Please select the eligibility criteria that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: Determining Optimal Post-Stroke Exercise (DOSE)
Brief Summary: The investigators will conduct a proof-of-concept study to provide preliminary evidence of efficacy of physical exercise dose on ambulatory function in adults undergoing sub-acute stroke rehabilitation.


Options:
A: Inclusion Criteria:

1. First-ever stroke with the onset 10-90 days prior to the enrollment
2. Age: 20-80y
3. With a hemiplegic upper extremity with Brunnstrom stage in I\~IV
4. Able to understand simple orders (1-step orders, such as "raise your hand, touch your head....)
5. Totally independent in activity of daily life before the onset of stroke

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Incompliance to the assessments or interventions due to unstable medical condition, abnormal cognition, or other conditions.
2. Stroke of brainstem or cerebellum
3. Had received craniotomy or ventriculoperitoneal shunting
4. Needs of orthoses in walking before the onset of stroke
5. Had had motor dysfunctions (eg, amputation, cerebral palsy, poliomyelitis or other neuromuscular diseases) before the stroke.
6. Intracranial hemorrhage caused by artereovenous malformation, aneurysm, or tumor
7. Able to walk independently for more than 50 meters.
B: Inclusion Criteria:

* Patients with clinical diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke (first or recurrent) confirmed by CCT or MRI admitted to the Acute Vascular Unit of HCPA between the first 48 hours of onset of symptoms.
* Patients older than 18 years.
* Patients clinically and hemodynamically stable (SBP 120-220 mmHg, SatO2 up to 92% with or without supplementation, HR between 60 and 100 bmp, body temperature below 38 and RR below 25 bpm).
* Patients are able to react to verbal commands even without being fully alert (Glasgow Scale above 8).
* Prior Rankin until 3
* Motor deficit and / or coordination measured by the NIHSS

Exclusion Criteria:

* Patients with clinical and / or hemodynamic instability
* Patients with hemorrhagic stroke or TIA (transient ischemic attack).
* Patients with progressive neurological disease and acute coronary disease and / or unstable.
C: Inclusion Criteria:

* Have been admitted to a hospital unit for stroke rehabilitation
* Within 10 weeks post-stroke
* 19 years or older
* Are experiencing difficulty walking

Exclusion Criteria:

* Requires greater than one person assist for transfer or ambulation
* Have uncontrolled medical condition or another serious medication condition in addition to stroke
* Unable to understand or follow directions
D: Inclusion Criteria:

* history unilateral stroke \> 6 months duration
* walks without physical assistance at speeds \< 1.0 m/s

Exclusion Criteria:

* no other cardiopulmonary, metabolic, neurological orthopedic injury that may contribute to walking outcomes

Answer: C
Please select the eligibility criteria that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: Determining Optimal Post-Stroke Exercise (DOSE)
Brief Summary: The investigators will conduct a proof-of-concept study to provide preliminary evidence of efficacy of physical exercise dose on ambulatory function in adults undergoing sub-acute stroke rehabilitation.


Options:
A: Inclusion Criteria:

* Have been admitted to a hospital unit for stroke rehabilitation
* Within 10 weeks post-stroke
* 19 years or older
* Are experiencing difficulty walking

Exclusion Criteria:

* Requires greater than one person assist for transfer or ambulation
* Have uncontrolled medical condition or another serious medication condition in addition to stroke
* Unable to understand or follow directions
B: Inclusion Criteria:

* A stroke diagnosis
* Can sit for 10 seconds without support
* Age 18-85
* Trunk Impairment Scale-Norwegian version (TIS-NV) \< 15
* Pre-stroke modified Ranking Scale (mRS) 0-3

Exclusion Criteria:

* Dementia
* Unable to cooperate in physiotherapy
* On-going substance abuse
* Severe co-morbidity preventing rehabilitation, severe neurological diseases such as Parkinson disease, Multiple Sclerosis and brain tumor.
C: Inclusion Criteria:

* Haemorrhagic or ischaemic stroke diagnosis has to be confirmed by the consultant appointed at the rehabilitation centre on the basis of CT or MRI imaging
* Patients with a history of first stroke
* Stroke onset within five months
* Patients who are able to sit independently for 30 seconds on a stable surface
* Hospitalized in the rehabilitation hospital RevArte
* Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

* A score of 20 or higher on the Trunk Impairment Scale
* A score of 2 or lower on the Functional Ambulation Categories
* Patients suffering from other neurological and orthopaedic disorders that could influence motor performance and balance
* Patients not able to understand instructions
D: Inclusion Criteria:

* Patients informed and giving their written consent.First
* Ever ischemic hemispheric or haemorrhagic stroke, unilateral, occurred between the 25th and the 72nd previous hours
* Age ≥ 18 years old
* Motricity quoted by an NIHSS \>=2 in the upper limb or in the lower limb

Exclusion Criteria:

* Patient without health insurance.
* Coma (NIHSS consciousness \> or = 2)
* Total recovery within the 24 first hours
* Brain stem or cerebellar stroke
* Previous neurological history, specially stroke or dementia
* Inability to understand the study
* Surgical treatment of the stroke
* Autonomy before stroke assessed by Rankin score different from 0
* Scheduled surgery in the following 15 days

Answer: A
Please select the eligibility criteria that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: The Effect of Lifestyle Intervention in Pregnancy - Follow-up on the Offspring in Early Childhood.
Brief Summary: Children born to obese women are at risk of increased adiposity and later adverse metabolic outcomes. We have conducted a follow-up study on an existing clinical trial, called the LiP study (Lifestyle in Pregnancy), registration number NCT00530439,in which 360 obese pregnant women were randomized to either lifestyle intervention or routine obstetric care. This present study follows the children until 3 years of age. We have the hypothesis, that the intervention during pregnancy results in a lower degree of adiposity and metabolic risk factors in the offspring. Clinical examination is taking place at age 2.5-3 years including anthropometric measurements, Dual energy x-ray (DXA) scans and blood samples measuring metabolic markers.


Options:
A: Inclusion criteria:

* Over 18 years old
* \< 16 weeks gestation
* BMI \>= 25
* Willing to consent

Exclusion Criteria:

* Pregnant with Twins
* Untreated medical or psychological problem
* Inability to be physically active
B: Inclusion Criteria:

* Women seeking care before 15 weeks of pregnancy, residents within catchment area of selected Primary Health Care Centers, who are not planning to move in the next two years will be invited to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

* Pregnant women classified as high risk according to the norms of the Chilean Ministry of Health(MoH) and/or underweight (BMI\<18.5)
C: Inclusion Criteria:

* BMI 30 or more
* Less than 20 weeks gestation
* member of Kaiser Permanente Northwest (NW)
* receive pre-natal care at Kaiser Permanente NW
* speaks English

Exclusion Criteria:

* no current treatment for cancer
* no bariatric surgery
* no current renal disease
* no multiple birth anticipated
* no hyperemesis requiring hospitalization
* no diabetes (type 1 or 2)
D: Inclusion Criteria:

* children born to women who were part of the preceding LiP study and who completed the LiP study until birth. Inclusion criteria for the LiP study:
* singleton pregnant
* BMI \>/= 30 and \</= 45 E xclusion Criteria for preceding LiP study:
* Chronic diseases
* Not Danish speaking
* Abuse of alcohol or drugs
* Preterm delivery in earlier pregnancies

Answer: D
Please select the eligibility criteria that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: The Effect of Lifestyle Intervention in Pregnancy - Follow-up on the Offspring in Early Childhood.
Brief Summary: Children born to obese women are at risk of increased adiposity and later adverse metabolic outcomes. We have conducted a follow-up study on an existing clinical trial, called the LiP study (Lifestyle in Pregnancy), registration number NCT00530439,in which 360 obese pregnant women were randomized to either lifestyle intervention or routine obstetric care. This present study follows the children until 3 years of age. We have the hypothesis, that the intervention during pregnancy results in a lower degree of adiposity and metabolic risk factors in the offspring. Clinical examination is taking place at age 2.5-3 years including anthropometric measurements, Dual energy x-ray (DXA) scans and blood samples measuring metabolic markers.


Options:
A: Inclusion Criteria:

- All children born to obese women who participated in the LiP study (a randomized controlled trial of lifestyle intervention during pregnancy) and children born at term to healthy women with a normal pregestational BMI.

Exclusion Criteria:

- The children born to normal weight women only: preterm birth, congenital anomalies, maternal gestational diabetes, maternal diabetes mellitus, severe medical conditions in either child or mother.
B: Inclusion Criteria:

* high risk for gestational diabetes
* fasting glucose 4.8-5.5 mmol/l and 2-hour glucose of OGTT \<7.8 mmol/l

Exclusion Criteria:

* normal glucose tolerance at weeks 8-12
* gestational diabetes at weeks 8-12
C: Inclusion Criteria:

1. Establish prenatal care at 6 - 16 weeks gestation
2. 18-49 years of age
3. Receive their entire prenatal care at the Resident Obstetrics Clinic
4. English and/or Spanish speaking
5. Singleton gestation.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Establish prenatal care \>16 weeks gestation
2. Non-English or non-Spanish speaking
3. Multiple gestation pregnancy
4. BMI \> 40
5. Preexisting diabetes, untreated thyroid disease, or hypertension requiring medication or other medical conditions that might affect body weight
6. Delivery at institution other than CMC-Main
7. Pregnancy ending in a premature delivery (\< 37 weeks)
8. Limited prenatal care (\<4 visits)
D: Inclusion Criteria:

* children born to women who were part of the preceding LiP study and who completed the LiP study until birth. Inclusion criteria for the LiP study:
* singleton pregnant
* BMI \>/= 30 and \</= 45 E xclusion Criteria for preceding LiP study:
* Chronic diseases
* Not Danish speaking
* Abuse of alcohol or drugs
* Preterm delivery in earlier pregnancies

Answer: D
Please select the eligibility criteria that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: The Effects of Lifestyle Intervention During Pregnancy in Obese Women on Offspring Adiposity and Metabolic Risk Factors- Comparison With Offspring of Normal Weight Women Not Participating in a Lifestyle Intervention Programme.
Brief Summary: Children born to obese women are at risk of increased adiposity and later adverse metabolic outcomes. We have conducted a follow-up study on an existing clinical trial, called the LiP study (Lifestyle in Pregnancy), registration number NCT00530439,in which 360 obese pregnant women were randomized to either lifestyle intervention or routine obstetric care. This present study follows the children until 3 years of age. We have the hypothesis, that the intervention during pregnancy results in a lower degree of adiposity and metabolic risk factors in the offspring. Clinical examination is taking place at age 2.5-3 years including anthropometric measurements, Dual energy x-ray (DXA) scans and blood samples measuring metabolic markers.In addition, we have included an extra control group of children born to normal weight women, who were not part of a lifestyle intervention program during pregnancy. We have the hypothesis that the children of the normal weight women have a better metabolic profile than the children born to the obese women.


Options:
A: Inclusion Criteria:

* 18 years of age or older
* A resident of Southwest Detroit
* Less than 20 weeks gestational at the eligibility screening

Exclusion Criteria: women with:

* Type 1 or type 2 diabetes
* Incompetent cervix/cerclage
* Active thyroid
* Multiple gestation
* Cardiac, vascular or pulmonary disease
* Drug or alcohol addiction
* Serious physical or mental illness or condition that would substantially interfere with participation in or completion of the entire intervention
B: Inclusion Criteria:

- All children born to obese women who participated in the LiP study (a randomized controlled trial of lifestyle intervention during pregnancy) and children born at term to healthy women with a normal pregestational BMI.

Exclusion Criteria:

- The children born to normal weight women only: preterm birth, congenital anomalies, maternal gestational diabetes, maternal diabetes mellitus, severe medical conditions in either child or mother.
C: Inclusion Criteria:

* Gestational age \<= 15th week of gestation
* Age: 18-43 years
* Written informed consent
* Body mass index (BMI) before pregnancy between 18 and 30 km/m2

Exclusion Criteria:

* High risk pregnancy
* Hypertonus
* Chronic diseases (i.e. diabetes mellitus)
* Psychiatric diseases
* Former supplementation with LC-PUFA
D: Inclusion Criteria:

* Being healthy and able to exercise following American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) guidelines
* Being able to communicate in spanish

Exclusion Criteria:

* Obstetrician complications
* Being interested in the study after 18 weeks
* Not being regular in physical exercise program
* Younger than 18 years old

Answer: B