Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: Effectiveness of a "Case Management Algorithm" After a Suicide Attempt in Terms of Repetition of the Suicidal Behaviors and Medico-economic Impact
Brief Summary: The suicidal behaviors are phenomena eminently multifactorial. It is thus always difficult to define univocal strategies of prevention of suicide repetition, during the emergency stay, i.e. almost in general population. One find 23 clinical trials in this topic in the past 25 years, and 18 are negative. The majority of the positive trials have the concern of being dissociated from an assumption of responsibility of care strictly speaking, to adopt a position "méta", nearer to the concept of "case management": how to remain in contact with the suicide attempter, without forcing it in this every day life, replacing a possible proposing, but assumption of responsibility resources reliable and quickly accessible in the event of at risk situation? Each one of these studies tests devices which seem more appropriate to such or such characteristic of this population, by retaining only simple criteria like the sex, the number of former suicide attempts, the proposal or not for an assumption of responsibility of care, the observance or not with the plan of care. Thus, it would seem interesting to combine these approaches in an algorithm entitled "ALGOS".

Main aim: To test the effectiveness of this algorithm of case management, named "ALGOS", in reducing the number of death by suicide, in terms of reduction of suicide re-attempts and the number of loss of contact patients in the ALGOS group during 6 months period, compared to a control group of suicide attempters treated as usual (i.e. primarily transmitted to the attending physician).

Secondary objectives: To evaluate, according to the method validated by Beecham in 1992, direct medico-economic impact in the year which follows the introduction of algorithm ALGOS. Reduction of the other suicidal behaviors in 6 months (reduction in the full number of suicidal repetitions in each group, evolution of the score of suicidal ideation, etc...). To evaluate the effect of the algorithm, at the 13th month. To study the possible differences within the time in terms of suicidal repetitions in the 2 groups. To propose different profiles of answers according to psychopathology, the number of suicide attempts, suicidal character, the sex,...

Methodology: Comparative simple blind prospective multicentric controlled study


Options:
A: Change from baseline on the Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview-Short Form (self-report) at follow-up (Pre-assessment and post-assessment (after intervention or two weeks from baseline))
B: Change in Number of Deaths by Suicide and/or Re-Presentations to Any Emergency Department (ED) in Ontario for Self-Harm - Data from the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES) (Baseline; 12 Months.)
C: Number of suicide re-attempters (six months)
D: Social Processing (Cyberball) fMRI Task: fMRI Responses (Pre-treatment (baseline) and post-treatment (up to 2 weeks)); Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA): Duration, Intensity, and Severity of NSSI Urges and Behavior (One week before tDCS (baseline), two weeks during tDCS (during tDCS), one week post-tDCS (post-tDCS)); Self Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Inventory Part 1 (Pre-treatment (baseline) and post-tDCS (up to 2 weeks after baseline)); Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA): NSSI Urges and Behavior (One week before tDCS (baseline), two weeks during tDCS (during tDCS), one week post-tDCS (post-tDCS)); Self Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Inventory Part 2 (pre-treatment (baseline) and post-treatment (up to 2 weeks)); Self Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Inventory Part 3 (Pre-treatment (baseline) and post-tDCS (up to 2 weeks after baseline)); Self Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Inventory Part 4 (Pre-treatment (baseline) and post-tDCS (up to 2 weeks after baseline))

Answer: C