Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: SHORT-HER: MULTICENTRIC RANDOMISED PHASE III TRIAL OF 2 DIFFERENT ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY REGIMENS PLUS 3 VS 12 MONTHS OF TRASTUZUMAB IN HER2 POSITIVE BREAST CANCER PATIENTS
Brief Summary: RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Monoclonal antibodies, such as trastuzumab, can block tumor growth in different ways. Some block the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Others find tumor cells and help kill them or carry tumor-killing substances to them. It is not yet known which regimen of combination chemotherapy given together with trastuzumab is most effective in treating breast cancer.

PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is comparing two different regimens of combination chemotherapy given together with trastuzumab to see how well they work in treating women with HER2-positive stage I, stage II, or stage III breast cancer.


Options:
A: Disease-free survival; Overall survival
B: Disease Free Survival (DFS) (Time from randomization through 5 years); Cardiotoxicity (time from randomization through 4 months)
C: Pathologic complete response
D: Percentage of Participants With Disease-Free Survival (DFS) Events in Herceptin 1-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up (From Baseline until time of event (median of 1 year)); Percentage of Participants With DFS Events in Herceptin 2-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up (From Baseline until time of event (median of 1 year)); DFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in Herceptin 1-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up (Year 2); DFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in Herceptin 2-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up (Year 2); Percentage of Participants With DFS Events Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up (From Baseline until time of event (median of 8 years)); DFS Rate at Year 3 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up (Year 3); DFS Rate at Year 5 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up (Year 5); DFS Rate at Year 7 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up (Year 7); DFS Rate at Year 8 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up (Year 8); Percentage of Participants With DFS Events Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up (From Baseline until time of event (maximum of 10 years)); DFS Rate at Year 3 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up (Year 3); DFS Rate at Year 5 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up (Year 5); DFS Rate at Year 7 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up (Year 7); DFS Rate at Year 8 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up (Year 8); DFS Rate at Year 9 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up (Year 9); DFS Rate at Year 10 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up (Year 10)

Answer: A