Please select the eligibility criteria that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: A Double-blind, Randomized, 6 Week, Parallel-group Design Clinical Trial in Patients With Mildly to Moderately Active Ulcerative Colitis to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Asacol 4.8 g/Day Versus Asacol 2.4 g/Day
Brief Summary: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Asacol 4.8 g/day (800 mg tablet) versus Asacol 2.4 g/day (400 mg tablet


Options:
A: Inclusion Criteria:

* Participants diagnosed with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) defined by a Mayo score of 6 to 12 inclusive at Baseline (Week 0), including an endoscopic (examination of an internal part of the body with a lighted tube; looking at a part of the body with a lighted tube) subscore of greater than or equal to 2
* Participants must have biopsy results (collected at the screening endoscopy (procedure or obtained within the last year) consistent with the diagnosis of UC
* Participants either currently receiving treatment with, or have a history of failure to respond to, or tolerate, at least 1 of the following therapies: oral 5-aminosalicylate, oral corticosteroids, 6-mercaptopurine and azathioprine
* Participants with current dependency or with a history of corticosteroid dependency (i.e., an inability to successfully taper corticosteroids without a return of the symptoms of UC)
* Not have a diagnosis of active tuberculosis
* Participants with negative stool test for enteric (by way of the intestines) pathogens

Exclusion Criteria:

* Participants with prior exposure to biologic anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents
* Participants with severe extensive UC that is likely to require a colectomy (surgery to remove part or all of the colon) within 12 weeks of study entry
* Participants having UC limited to the rectum only or to less than 20 centimeter of the colon
* Presence of a stoma (an artificial permanent opening especially in the abdominal wall made in surgical procedures) or presence of a fistula
* Participants with a history of extensive colonic resection
B: Inclusion Criteria:

* confirmed diagnosis of ulcerative colitis

Exclusion Criteria:

* a history of allergy or hypersensitivity to salicylates or aminosalicylates;
* a history of extensive small bowel resection
C: Inclusion Criteria:

* Clinical diagnosis of moderate to severe UC confirmed by endoscopic and histologic evidence
* Mayo score ≥6 with an endoscopic subscore of ≥2
* Inadequate response and/or intolerance to one or more conventional therapy (i.e. oral aminosalicylates, immunosuppressants, corticosteroids, and/or TNF antagonist)

Exclusion Criteria:

* Diagnosis of Crohn's Disease or Indeterminate Colitis
* Diagnosis of UC that is limited to the rectum
* Evidence of fulminant colitis, toxic megacolon, or bowel perforation
* Current need for a colostomy or ileostomy
* Previous total or subtotal colectomy
D: Inclusion Criteria:

* Patients fulfilling the following criteria at the screening visit are eligible for participation in the study:

  * Male and female patients, 18-75 years old, suffering from ulcerative colitis for at least 6 months.
  * Diagnosis of ulcerative colitis in active phase, of mild or moderate entity with Ulcerative Colitis Disease Activity Index (UCDAI) ≥ 4 and ≤ 10 according to Sutherland.
  * All females of child-bearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test immediately prior to enrollment. In addition, all females of child-bearing potential must agree to be completely abstinent or be using an accepted form of contraception throughout the entire study period. Accepted forms of contraception are defined as those with a failure rate \<1% when properly applied and include: combination oral pill, some intra-uterine devices, and a sterilised partner in a stable relationship. Female subjects must also not be actively breast-feeding through the entire study period.
  * Ability to comprehend the full nature and purpose of the study, including possible risks and side effects.
  * Ability to co-operate with the investigator and to comply with the requirements of the entire study.
  * Must be able to understand and voluntarily sign written informed consent prior to inclusion in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Patients who meet any of the following criteria at screening visit are to be excluded from study participation:

  * Patients with limited distal proctitis (from anal verge up to 15 cm above the pectineal line).
  * Patients with severe ulcerative colitis (UCDAI \>10).
  * Patients with infectious colitis.
  * Evidence or history of toxic megacolon.
  * Severe anaemia, leucopaenia or granulocytopaenia.
  * Use of oral or rectal steroids in the last 4 weeks.
  * Use of immuno-suppressive agents in the last 8 weeks before the study.
  * Use of anti tumour necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFα) agents in the last 3 months.
  * Concomitant use of any rectal preparation.
  * Concomitant use of antibiotics.
  * Concurrent use of cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) inducers or CYP3A4 inhibitors.
  * Patients with verified, presumed or expected pregnancy or ongoing lactation.
  * Patients with liver cirrhosis, or evident hepatic or renal disease or insufficiency, and/or severe impairment of the bio-humoural parameters (i.e. 2 x upper limit of normal for alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) or creatinine).
  * Patient with severe diseases in other organs and systems.
  * Patients with local or systemic complications or other pathological states requiring a therapy with corticosteroids and/or immuno-suppressive agents.
  * Patients diagnosed with type 1 diabetes.
  * Patients diagnosed with, or with a family history of, glaucoma.
  * All patients with known hepatitis B, hepatitis C or with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), according to the local privacy policy.
  * Participation in experimental therapeutic studies in the last 3 months. (Note: patients who participated in observational only studies are not excluded).
  * Any other medical condition that in the principal investigator's opinion would make the administration of the study drug or study procedures hazardous to the subject or obscure the interpretation of adverse events (AEs).

Answer: B