Please select the eligibility criteria that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: Randomised Trial of the Effectiveness of Two Educational Interventions to Improve Evidence-based Practice Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviour in Occupational Therapists
Brief Summary: This pragmatic randomised controlled trial (RCT) used a two-group parallel design with matched-pair stratification by type (clinician/manager) and knowledge score. The trial aimed to: 1) determine whether an IE was more effective than a DE for improving EBP knowledge, skills and use at 12 weeks, and 2) to investigate the feasibility of conducting a RCT with occupational therapists in a public health setting. Occupational therapists employed by the Western Cape Department of Health (DOH) form,ed the study population(N=98). Fifty-eight consented to participate and were randomly allocated to either an interactive (IE) or a didactic (DE) educational intervention using coin tossing. Data was collected at baseline and 12 weeks The primary outcome was increased EBP knowledge at 12 weeks shown by an improved total knowledge score. Secondary outcomes were improved attitudes and behaviour. Data were collected at the health facilities where participants were employed. Raters for the audit were blinded but participants and the provider could not be blinded.

Thirty participants were allocated to receive the IE and 28 the DE. Twenty-five participants in the IE and 21 in the DE completed the trial and were included in the 12 week analysis. Results revealed no significant difference between the groups in the primary knowledge outcome at 12 weeks. Examination of within-group changes revealed significant improvements in knowledge in both groups (IE: T=4.0, p\<0.001; DE: T=12.0, p=0.002), but the IE also showed a significant increase in behaviour (T=64.5, p=0.044) and attitudes on one sub-scale (T=33.0, p=0.039). As the study was powered at 43%, it may have failed to detect significant differences at 12 weeks. Conducting a high-quality RCT was feasible and the risk of bias was assessed as low. The OTEBP trial adds strength to the existing evidence that both didactic and interactive educational interventions can improve knowledge, but it seems that interactive interventions may be more effective for changing behaviour. High-quality pragmatic trials can feasibly be conducted within the public health service


Options:
A: Inclusion Criteria:

* The intervention-study comprises 40 general practices were:

  1. more than 50% of the patients with type 2 diabetes, who had participated in diabetes-consultations during the last year from the invitation-date to the project, were seen by a nurse at least once, stated by the practice. The diabetes-consultation should not only include examinations (blood tests and blood pressure measurement), but should also include communication about living with type 2 diabetes ;
  2. enrollment in the project before registration deadline (three weeks after invitation).

Patients with diabetes, alive and affiliated the practices by May 2011, were identified in a a validated diabetes database based on health registers; The national Patient Registry, The national Health Insurance Service registry, the prescription database and the laboratory database in the county.
B: Inclusion Criteria for Hospitals

Hospitals were invited to participate in the study if they fulfill the following criteria:

* have an Institutional Review Board (IRB), or existing committee which could serve as such, or have an agreement with an IRB which reviews the research protocols implemented in the hospital;
* have at least 500 vaginal deliveries per year;
* do not have an explicit policy for selective episiotomy and for active management of third stage of labor;
* are located within the study area in Argentina and Uruguay; and
* agree to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria for Hospitals

Preselected hospitals are performing baseline data collection. According to the results of the analysis of the baseline data collection, hospitals will be excluded if the episiotomy rate is low or the rate of active management of the third stage of labor is high, according to the following cut-off points:

* Episiotomy rate in spontaneous vaginal deliveries below 20%
* Rate of active management of third stage of labor over 25%

The sample size of the study was increased to allow for exclusions.

Expectant management is defined as "a hands-free policy" during third stage of labor until the placenta is expelled: no use of uterotonics or special maneuvers.

Sampling, Recruitment, and Screening Procedures

Latin American Center for Perinatology (CLAP) coordination team will be responsible for the hospital selection. The hospitals' fulfillment of selection criteria will be obtained through a survey of the Heads of the Obstetrical Departments.

Besides the selection criteria, the coordination unit will invite the hospitals to participate according to:

* their participation in previous trials coordinated by CLAP,
* their participation in other trials or research activities, and
* their location.

Of particular interest are the characteristics of each preselected hospital regarding the structure of the professional staff, number of deliveries, and clinical guidelines policy.
C: Inclusion Criteria:

* Cardiology Attending physicians at Massachusetts General Hospital
* Primary care physicians at Massachusetts General Hospital

Exclusion Criteria:

* Physicians-in-training
D: Inclusion Criteria:

* Occupational therapists employed by the Western Cape Department of Health (DOH)
* Working at least 20 hours per week

Exclusion Criteria:

* Working at a distance of more than 1½ hours from Cape Town
* Therapists who would be leaving the DOH before December 2008 or taking leave during the time of the intervention

Answer: D