TrialPanorama/Dataset huggingface dataset:
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: Urgent Versus Post-Stabilization ART in HIV-1 Infected Children With Severe Co-Infections
Brief Summary: Design: Randomized clinical trial involving hospitalized HIV-1 infected children. Children will be randomized to randomized to urgent (\<48 hours) versus early antiretroviral therapy (7-14 days). This trial will be unblinded.

Population: Hospitalized HIV-1 infected children who are antiretroviral therapy (ART) naïve ≤ 12 years of age.

Sample size: 360 children will be randomized (180 per arm).

Treatment: All infants will be treated with ART according to World Health Organization (WHO) and Kenyan national guidelines.

Study duration: Enrollment into the study will occur over the course of 36-48 months and each infant will be routinely followed for a maximum of 6 months.

Study site: Kenyan hospitals.

Primary hypothesis:

HIV-1 infected children hospitalized with severe co-infection either may be unsalvageable due to too far advanced immunosuppression/co-infection or may benefit from urgent ART.

Secondary hypotheses:

Urgent ART during an acute infection could potentially result in increased risk of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) or drug toxicities/interactions.

Specific aims:

1. To compare the 6 month all-cause mortality rate, incidence of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS), and incidence of drug toxicity in HIV-1 infected children (≤ 12 years old) presenting to hospital with a serious infection randomized to urgent (\<48 hours) versus early ART (7-14 days).
2. To determine co-factors for mortality, IRIS, and drug toxicity. Potential cofactors will include: baseline weight-for-age, height-for-age, weight-for-height (Z-scores), CD4, HIV-1 RNA, type of co-infection, age, rate of viral load and CD4 change following ART, immune activation markers, pathogen and HIV-1 specific immune responses.

Secondary aim: To determine etiologies of IRIS and to compare immune reconstitution to HIV, TB, EBV and CMV following ART overall and in each trial arm.


Options:
A: All-cause Mortality (6 months post-HAART initiation)
B: All-cause mortality (8 weeks)
C: Number of patients who complete tuberculosis treatment (6 months)
D: Time to TB treatment initiation (8 weeks follow up)

Answer: A
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: Urgent Versus Post-Stabilization ART in HIV-1 Infected Children With Severe Co-Infections
Brief Summary: Design: Randomized clinical trial involving hospitalized HIV-1 infected children. Children will be randomized to randomized to urgent (\<48 hours) versus early antiretroviral therapy (7-14 days). This trial will be unblinded.

Population: Hospitalized HIV-1 infected children who are antiretroviral therapy (ART) naïve ≤ 12 years of age.

Sample size: 360 children will be randomized (180 per arm).

Treatment: All infants will be treated with ART according to World Health Organization (WHO) and Kenyan national guidelines.

Study duration: Enrollment into the study will occur over the course of 36-48 months and each infant will be routinely followed for a maximum of 6 months.

Study site: Kenyan hospitals.

Primary hypothesis:

HIV-1 infected children hospitalized with severe co-infection either may be unsalvageable due to too far advanced immunosuppression/co-infection or may benefit from urgent ART.

Secondary hypotheses:

Urgent ART during an acute infection could potentially result in increased risk of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) or drug toxicities/interactions.

Specific aims:

1. To compare the 6 month all-cause mortality rate, incidence of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS), and incidence of drug toxicity in HIV-1 infected children (≤ 12 years old) presenting to hospital with a serious infection randomized to urgent (\<48 hours) versus early ART (7-14 days).
2. To determine co-factors for mortality, IRIS, and drug toxicity. Potential cofactors will include: baseline weight-for-age, height-for-age, weight-for-height (Z-scores), CD4, HIV-1 RNA, type of co-infection, age, rate of viral load and CD4 change following ART, immune activation markers, pathogen and HIV-1 specific immune responses.

Secondary aim: To determine etiologies of IRIS and to compare immune reconstitution to HIV, TB, EBV and CMV following ART overall and in each trial arm.


Options:
A: Tuberculosis diagnostic algorithm (3 years)
B: All-cause Mortality (6 months post-HAART initiation)
C: All-cause mortality (8 weeks)
D: To Evaluate the Safety Profile of MVA85A/AERAS-485 in Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) -Vaccinated, HIV-negative Infants. (AEs recorded 28 days post-vaccination; SAEs recorded for entire study period.)

Answer: B
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: Urgent Versus Post-Stabilization ART in HIV-1 Infected Children With Severe Co-Infections
Brief Summary: Design: Randomized clinical trial involving hospitalized HIV-1 infected children. Children will be randomized to randomized to urgent (\<48 hours) versus early antiretroviral therapy (7-14 days). This trial will be unblinded.

Population: Hospitalized HIV-1 infected children who are antiretroviral therapy (ART) naïve ≤ 12 years of age.

Sample size: 360 children will be randomized (180 per arm).

Treatment: All infants will be treated with ART according to World Health Organization (WHO) and Kenyan national guidelines.

Study duration: Enrollment into the study will occur over the course of 36-48 months and each infant will be routinely followed for a maximum of 6 months.

Study site: Kenyan hospitals.

Primary hypothesis:

HIV-1 infected children hospitalized with severe co-infection either may be unsalvageable due to too far advanced immunosuppression/co-infection or may benefit from urgent ART.

Secondary hypotheses:

Urgent ART during an acute infection could potentially result in increased risk of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) or drug toxicities/interactions.

Specific aims:

1. To compare the 6 month all-cause mortality rate, incidence of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS), and incidence of drug toxicity in HIV-1 infected children (≤ 12 years old) presenting to hospital with a serious infection randomized to urgent (\<48 hours) versus early ART (7-14 days).
2. To determine co-factors for mortality, IRIS, and drug toxicity. Potential cofactors will include: baseline weight-for-age, height-for-age, weight-for-height (Z-scores), CD4, HIV-1 RNA, type of co-infection, age, rate of viral load and CD4 change following ART, immune activation markers, pathogen and HIV-1 specific immune responses.

Secondary aim: To determine etiologies of IRIS and to compare immune reconstitution to HIV, TB, EBV and CMV following ART overall and in each trial arm.


Options:
A: Comparison of novel intensive-case finding diagnostic tools to standard intensive-case finding strategy (2 months)
B: All-cause Mortality (6 months post-HAART initiation)
C: Sensitivity of the lateral-flow urine LAM assay (LF-LAM) (One year); Failure rate of the lateral-flow urine LAM assay (One year); Inter-reader variability of the lateral-flow urine LAM assay (One year); Specificity of the lateral-flow urine LAM assay (LF-LAM) (One year)
D: To compare the characteristics of subjects with relapsed tuberculosis verses the characteristics of subjects that do not experience relapse disease (Over course of the study)

Answer: B
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: Urgent Versus Post-Stabilization ART in HIV-1 Infected Children With Severe Co-Infections
Brief Summary: Design: Randomized clinical trial involving hospitalized HIV-1 infected children. Children will be randomized to randomized to urgent (\<48 hours) versus early antiretroviral therapy (7-14 days). This trial will be unblinded.

Population: Hospitalized HIV-1 infected children who are antiretroviral therapy (ART) naïve ≤ 12 years of age.

Sample size: 360 children will be randomized (180 per arm).

Treatment: All infants will be treated with ART according to World Health Organization (WHO) and Kenyan national guidelines.

Study duration: Enrollment into the study will occur over the course of 36-48 months and each infant will be routinely followed for a maximum of 6 months.

Study site: Kenyan hospitals.

Primary hypothesis:

HIV-1 infected children hospitalized with severe co-infection either may be unsalvageable due to too far advanced immunosuppression/co-infection or may benefit from urgent ART.

Secondary hypotheses:

Urgent ART during an acute infection could potentially result in increased risk of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) or drug toxicities/interactions.

Specific aims:

1. To compare the 6 month all-cause mortality rate, incidence of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS), and incidence of drug toxicity in HIV-1 infected children (≤ 12 years old) presenting to hospital with a serious infection randomized to urgent (\<48 hours) versus early ART (7-14 days).
2. To determine co-factors for mortality, IRIS, and drug toxicity. Potential cofactors will include: baseline weight-for-age, height-for-age, weight-for-height (Z-scores), CD4, HIV-1 RNA, type of co-infection, age, rate of viral load and CD4 change following ART, immune activation markers, pathogen and HIV-1 specific immune responses.

Secondary aim: To determine etiologies of IRIS and to compare immune reconstitution to HIV, TB, EBV and CMV following ART overall and in each trial arm.


Options:
A: All-cause Mortality (6 months post-HAART initiation)
B: All-cause mortality and incidence of invasive bacterial infections (24 weeks)
C: All-cause mortality 12 weeks after inclusion (12 weeks)
D: Survival of newly-diagnosed HIV-infected patients at 1 year (4 years)

Answer: A
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: Supervised Obesity Reduction Trial for AF Ablation Patients
Brief Summary: Study hypothesis:

Weight reduction in obese patients with atrial fibrillation. Obese patients benefit from an obesity treatment after atrial fibrillation ablation.

Study design:

A prospective randomized, open-label clinical trial.


Options:
A: Freedom from AF (18 months)
B: Time to First Event of Adjudicated Cardiovascular (CV) Death or Adjudicated Hospitalisation for Heart Failure (HHF) (From randomization until completion of the planned treatment phase, up to 1403 days.)
C: The primary endpoint of the study is defined as AF burden between 3 to 12 months after first AF ablation (12 months)
D: Death (4 months); Death (8 months); Death (12 months); Death (16 months); Death (20 months); Death (24 months); Death (3 years); Death (4 years); Stroke/Systemic embolism (SE) (4 months); Stroke/Systemic embolism (SE) (8 months); Stroke/Systemic embolism (SE) (12 months); Stroke/Systemic embolism (SE) (16 months); Stroke/Systemic embolism (SE) (20 months); Stroke/Systemic embolism (SE) (24 months); Stroke/Systemic embolism (SE) (3 years); Stroke/Systemic embolism (SE) (4 years); Major bleeding (4 months); Major bleeding (8 months); Major bleeding (12 months); Major bleeding (16 months); Major bleeding (20 months); Major bleeding (24 months); Major bleeding (3 years); Major bleeding (4 years)

Answer: C
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: Reduced-dosed Rivaroxaban and Standard-dosed Rivaroxaban Versus ASA in the Long-term Prevention of Recurrent Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Symptomatic Deep-vein Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism
Brief Summary: This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, event-driven, superiority study for efficacy.

Patients with confirmed symptomatic DVT (Deep Vein Thrombosis) or PE (Pulmonary embolism) who completed 6 or 12 months of treatment of anticoagulation are eligible for this trial


Options:
A: All-cause mortality at day 28 (Day 28 from randomization)
B: low molecular weight heparin (enoxaparin) and ventilatory support time (30 days); thrombotic complications and Rivaroxaban (30 days); low molecular weight heparin (enoxaparin) and length of hospital stay (30 days); low molecular weight heparin (enoxaparin) and mortality rate (30 days)
C: Safety of In-hospital Thromboprophylaxis as Assessed by Number of Participants With ISTH-defined Clinically-relevant Bleeding Events During Hospitalization (Day 30)
D: Number of Participants With the Composite of Fatal or Non-fatal Symptomatic Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism (Up to 12 months, at least 6 months); Number of Participants With First Treatment-emergent Major Bleeding (Up to 12 months, at least 6 months)

Answer: D
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: Reduced-dosed Rivaroxaban and Standard-dosed Rivaroxaban Versus ASA in the Long-term Prevention of Recurrent Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Symptomatic Deep-vein Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism
Brief Summary: This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, event-driven, superiority study for efficacy.

Patients with confirmed symptomatic DVT (Deep Vein Thrombosis) or PE (Pulmonary embolism) who completed 6 or 12 months of treatment of anticoagulation are eligible for this trial


Options:
A: Number of Participants With the Composite of Fatal or Non-fatal Symptomatic Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism (Up to 12 months, at least 6 months); Number of Participants With First Treatment-emergent Major Bleeding (Up to 12 months, at least 6 months)
B: Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism [VTE] (i.e. the Composite of Recurrent Deep Vein Thrombosis [DVT] or Fatal or Non-fatal Pulmonary Embolism [PE]) Until the Intended End of Study Treatment (3-, 6- or 12-month study treatment period)
C: Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism [VTE] (i.e. the Composite of Recurrent Deep Vein Thrombosis [DVT] or Fatal or Non-fatal Pulmonary Embolism [PE]) Until the Intended End of Study Treatment (6- or 12-month study treatment period)
D: Composite of Recurrent VTE or VTE Death at 36 Months (36 months); Composite of Recurrent VTE or VTE Death at 18 Months (18 months)

Answer: A
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: Reduced-dosed Rivaroxaban and Standard-dosed Rivaroxaban Versus ASA in the Long-term Prevention of Recurrent Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Symptomatic Deep-vein Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism
Brief Summary: This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, event-driven, superiority study for efficacy.

Patients with confirmed symptomatic DVT (Deep Vein Thrombosis) or PE (Pulmonary embolism) who completed 6 or 12 months of treatment of anticoagulation are eligible for this trial


Options:
A: Number of Participants With the Composite of Fatal or Non-fatal Symptomatic Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism (Up to 12 months, at least 6 months); Number of Participants With First Treatment-emergent Major Bleeding (Up to 12 months, at least 6 months)
B: Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism [VTE] (i.e. the Composite of Recurrent Deep Vein Thrombosis [DVT] or Fatal or Non-fatal Pulmonary Embolism [PE]) Until the Intended End of Study Treatment (3-, 6-, or 12-month study treatment period)
C: Number of Participants With Recurrent Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) and Deaths Related to VTE (For statistical analysis 1: from randomisation to end of post treatment period (ptp), planned to be up to day 224. For statistical analysis 2: from randomisation to 6 months (up to day 180))
D: The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite of symptomatic recurrent DVT or symptomatic fatal and non-fatal PE at 12 weeks and deterioration in thrombotic burden, as assessed by CUS and PLS, at baseline and at 12 weeks. (12 weeks)

Answer: A
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: Reduced-dosed Rivaroxaban and Standard-dosed Rivaroxaban Versus ASA in the Long-term Prevention of Recurrent Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Symptomatic Deep-vein Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism
Brief Summary: This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, event-driven, superiority study for efficacy.

Patients with confirmed symptomatic DVT (Deep Vein Thrombosis) or PE (Pulmonary embolism) who completed 6 or 12 months of treatment of anticoagulation are eligible for this trial


Options:
A: Centrally Confirmed Symptomatic Recurrent Venous Thrombotic Events (VTE) Including Unexplained Death During the Intended Treatment Period (6 months)
B: Symptomatic Recurrent VTE, i.e., the Composite of DVT, Non-fatal PE, and Fatal PE (12 months from time of randomization)
C: Number of Participants With the Composite of Fatal or Non-fatal Symptomatic Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism (Up to 12 months, at least 6 months); Number of Participants With First Treatment-emergent Major Bleeding (Up to 12 months, at least 6 months)
D: Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism [VTE] (i.e. the Composite of Recurrent Deep Vein Thrombosis [DVT] or Fatal or Non-fatal Pulmonary Embolism [PE]) Until the Intended End of Study Treatment (3-, 6-, or 12-month study treatment period)

Answer: C
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: Reduced-dosed Rivaroxaban and Standard-dosed Rivaroxaban Versus ASA in the Long-term Prevention of Recurrent Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Symptomatic Deep-vein Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism
Brief Summary: This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, event-driven, superiority study for efficacy.

Patients with confirmed symptomatic DVT (Deep Vein Thrombosis) or PE (Pulmonary embolism) who completed 6 or 12 months of treatment of anticoagulation are eligible for this trial


Options:
A: Clotted dialyzers (Day 3 of dialysis)
B: Number of Participants With the Composite of Fatal or Non-fatal Symptomatic Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism (Up to 12 months, at least 6 months); Number of Participants With First Treatment-emergent Major Bleeding (Up to 12 months, at least 6 months)
C: Venous thromboembolic events (VTE) (Within 30 days from randomization); Mechanical ventilation free-survival (Within 30 days from randomization); Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) (Within 30 days from randomization); Out-of-hospital death not attributed to major injury (Within 30 days from randomization)
D: Improvement of Total EKOS Thrombus Score, a specifically developed venographic scoring system (After 15 hours of CDT)

Answer: B
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Oral Analgesic Utilization for Pain Management of CHildhood Musculoskeletal Injuries
Brief Summary: Pain management for children presenting to the emergency department (ED) with an injured limb is often under-treated, even though it is known that broken arms and legs cause moderate to severe pain. Further, children are less likely to receive appropriate pain medicine than adults with similar injuries. This study aims to improve the pain treatment of children who present to the ED with a suspected fracture, or broken bone or severe sprain. The investigators will compare the use of 3 different possible medication combinations (ibuprofen alone, oral morphine alone, or combined ibuprofen and oral morphine) to determine which combination is the best at treating children's pain. The investigators also plan to verify the safety of using these different drugs to treat children's pain.

The investigators strongly believe that children's pain should be optimally treated in the ED. Adequately relieving children's pain is crucial, as inadequate pain treatment can have both short and longterm effects on the child. It also generates unnecessary stress for both the child and their caregivers/parents. Given this knowledge, the investigators feel that their study has the potential to impact care provided in EDs, and improve pain management safely, for children.


Options:
A: Decrement of the pain on VAS (Baseline and 60 minutes)
B: analgesic efficacy both at rest and with movement (72 hours)
C: Decrease in sum of pain intensity difference scores over first 5 days of treatment
D: Pain Intensity - Percentage of Children Who Achieved VAS < 30 mm (60 minutes post-analgesia)

Answer: D
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: Brief Alcohol Interventions With Mobile Phone Applications for University Students: Interventions Targeting Differing Risk Levels in Two Consecutive Randomized Controlled Trials
Brief Summary: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of three mobile phone applications, Promillekoll, PartyPlanner and TeleCoach among university student union members with problematic drinking. Two trials are conducted, one a three-armed randomized controlled study, and the second a two-armed randomized control study. Outcomes are measured in terms of changes in problematic alcohol use at follow up 6,12 and 18 weeks after baseline data gathering. Both the Promillekoll and PartyPlanner apps feature real time registration of alcohol consumption and give feedback of estimated blood alcohol concentration levels. PartyPlanner also allows for planning an alcohol consumption event in advance and for later comparison of the plan with actual consumption. Study 1 compares these two apps with a control group. In Study 2, participants reporting alcohol consumption above the weekly recommended level are redirected to randomized assignment to an in-depth app, TeleCoach, which offers different exercises for reducing alcohol use. After 6 weeks the controls are offered the TeleCoach intervention for 6 weeks, and the first intervention group loses app access. In both studies, followup occurs 6, 12 and 18 weeks after baseline registration.

Hypotheses:

Study 1: 1. The groups receiving the Promillekoll and PartyPlanner interventions will reduce their alcohol use to a larger extent than the control group at follow-up compared to the baseline level. 2. The planning function in PartyPlanner will be associated with an increased decrease in alcohol consumption compared to only real-time use for Promillekoll.

Study 2: The proportion of participants with risky use above recommended levels will decline faster in the group that receives the intervention first, in comparison to controls.


Options:
A: Reduction of 15% in alcohol consumption with an average volume of approximately 38-41 grams alcohol per week in the PFI group . In the self-help material group we expect that 5 - 10% will reduce their consumption equivalent. (12 months)
B: Change in estimated Blood Alcohol Concentration (eBAC) (6, 12 and 18 weeks); Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) (6, 12 and 18 weeks)
C: proportion of negative breath samples submitted (Week 4)
D: Change in estimated Blood Alcohol Concentration (eBAC) (7 weeks)

Answer: B