TrialPanorama/Dataset huggingface dataset:
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: Smoking Cessation in Patients With COPD (SMOCC) in General Practice
Brief Summary: Background: Smoking cessation is the key element in the treatment of patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). The role of the general practice in assisting these patients with successful quitting smoking was suboptimal. Therefore we evaluated the effectiveness of two smoking cessation programs (counseling and nicotine replacement) for smokers with COPD in routine general practice, one with (CNB) and one without (CN) the combination with bupropion-SR, compared to usual care (UC) and explored the role of COPD symptoms in successful smoking cessation.

Method: RCT with 667 patients with COPD, 68 general practices were randomly allocated. The usual care group (UC) consisted of 148 patients (22 practices), the first intervention group (counseling plus nicotine replacement (CN) of 243 patients (21 practices) and the second intervention group of 276 patients (25 practices. Main outcome measure was (biochemically verified) point prevalence.


Options:
A: 4 week Continuous Quit Rate ( 4 week CQR ) for Weeks 9 -12.
B: Smoking cessation (point prevalence, both self reported as biochemical verified) (12 months)
C: Number of Participants With Reported 7-day Point Prevalence Abstinence at Week 12 (12 weeks following treatment initiation); Number of Participants With Reported 7-day Point Prevalence Abstinence at Week 24 (24 weeks following treatment initiation); Number of Participants With Reported 7-day Point Prevalence Abstinence at Week 52 (52 weeks following treatment initiation); Number of Participants With Reported 7-day Point Prevalence Abstinence at Follow-up Week 64 (64 weeks following treatment initiation); Number of Participants With Reported 7-day Point Prevalence Abstinence at Follow-up Week 104 (104 weeks following treatment initiation)
D: Change in sputum eosinophile-% from >1% to normal or neutrophile-% from >61% to normal, from baseline (week 0) to week 12. (Time frame for primary outcome: 0-12 weeks (total study duration 24 weeks))

Answer: B
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: Smoking Cessation in Patients With COPD (SMOCC) in General Practice
Brief Summary: Background: Smoking cessation is the key element in the treatment of patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). The role of the general practice in assisting these patients with successful quitting smoking was suboptimal. Therefore we evaluated the effectiveness of two smoking cessation programs (counseling and nicotine replacement) for smokers with COPD in routine general practice, one with (CNB) and one without (CN) the combination with bupropion-SR, compared to usual care (UC) and explored the role of COPD symptoms in successful smoking cessation.

Method: RCT with 667 patients with COPD, 68 general practices were randomly allocated. The usual care group (UC) consisted of 148 patients (22 practices), the first intervention group (counseling plus nicotine replacement (CN) of 243 patients (21 practices) and the second intervention group of 276 patients (25 practices. Main outcome measure was (biochemically verified) point prevalence.


Options:
A: Smoking cessation (point prevalence, both self reported as biochemical verified) (12 months)
B: Point prevalence of smoking cessation (those who have quitted smoking and have not smoked in the past week prior to the assessment date). (52 weeks after starting the treatment)
C: 7 Day Point Prevalence of Cigarette Abstinence (6-month follow up); 7 Day Point Prevalence of Cigarette Abstinence (Week 8)
D: Proportion of Cocaine Positive Urine Tests Per Week (Weekly Measures over 12 weeks)

Answer: A
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: Smoking Cessation in Patients With COPD (SMOCC) in General Practice
Brief Summary: Background: Smoking cessation is the key element in the treatment of patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). The role of the general practice in assisting these patients with successful quitting smoking was suboptimal. Therefore we evaluated the effectiveness of two smoking cessation programs (counseling and nicotine replacement) for smokers with COPD in routine general practice, one with (CNB) and one without (CN) the combination with bupropion-SR, compared to usual care (UC) and explored the role of COPD symptoms in successful smoking cessation.

Method: RCT with 667 patients with COPD, 68 general practices were randomly allocated. The usual care group (UC) consisted of 148 patients (22 practices), the first intervention group (counseling plus nicotine replacement (CN) of 243 patients (21 practices) and the second intervention group of 276 patients (25 practices. Main outcome measure was (biochemically verified) point prevalence.


Options:
A: 6 Month Self-reported Abstinence From Smoking (6 months)
B: Emotional Reactivity By Pharmacotherapy (Baseline to 1 month); Emotional Reactivity By Pharmacotherapy Moderated by DRD2 A1 Allele (Baseline to 1 month)
C: 4 week Continuous Quit Rate ( 4 week CQR ) for weeks 9 -12
D: Smoking cessation (point prevalence, both self reported as biochemical verified) (12 months)

Answer: D
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: A Phase II, Open-Label, Randomised, Comparative, International Multicentre Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Different Doses of AZD2281 Given Orally Twice Daily Versus Intravenous Liposomal Doxorubicin Given Monthly in Patients With Advanced BRCA1- or BRCA2-Associated Ovarian Cancer Who Have Failed Previous Platinum-based Chemotherapy
Brief Summary: The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of 2 doses of drug AZD2281 against liposomal doxorubicin to see which is effective and well tolerated in treating patients with measurable BRCA1- or BRCA2-positive advanced ovarian cancer and who have failed previous platinum therapy.


Options:
A: Tolerability of regimen (4 weeks)
B: Objective Response Rate (ORR) Evaluated According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) Guidelines (Each patient with measurable disease at baseline was assessed for Objective Response from the sequence of RECIST scan data up to data cut-off, 26 March 2010. RECIST scans were performed every 8 weeks (+/- 2 weeks) from randomization.)
C: Progression Free Survival (PFS) (Tumour assessment was to be assessed at screening, every 8 weeks during the study and at the withdrawal visit, up to 56 weeks. (Data cut-off for primary analysis of PFS: 15 September 2009))
D: Progression Free Survival (PFS) (According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours [RECIST]) (Radiologic scans performed at baseline then every 12 weeks (+/- 1 week) for the first 60 weeks, then every 24 weeks (+/-1 week) thereafter, assessed maximum up to 14 months.)

Answer: C
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: A Phase II, Open-Label, Randomised, Comparative, International Multicentre Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Different Doses of AZD2281 Given Orally Twice Daily Versus Intravenous Liposomal Doxorubicin Given Monthly in Patients With Advanced BRCA1- or BRCA2-Associated Ovarian Cancer Who Have Failed Previous Platinum-based Chemotherapy
Brief Summary: The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of 2 doses of drug AZD2281 against liposomal doxorubicin to see which is effective and well tolerated in treating patients with measurable BRCA1- or BRCA2-positive advanced ovarian cancer and who have failed previous platinum therapy.


Options:
A: Progression Free Survival (PFS) Using Investigator Assessment According to Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST 1.1) (Radiologic scans performed at baseline then every 12 weeks up to 156 weeks, then every 24 weeks thereafter until objective radiological disease progression. DCO: 17 May 2018)
B: Efficacy: Progression Free Survival (PFS) (An average of 30 months for each participant); Safety: Number of Evacuations Per Day (Evacuation were collected daily for the first four weeks of treatment of experimental drugs)
C: Overall survival (Approximately 36 months after last patient randomized and observation of 244 events)
D: Progression Free Survival (PFS) (Tumour assessment was to be assessed at screening, every 8 weeks during the study and at the withdrawal visit, up to 56 weeks. (Data cut-off for primary analysis of PFS: 15 September 2009))

Answer: D
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: A Phase II, Open-Label, Randomised, Comparative, International Multicentre Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Different Doses of AZD2281 Given Orally Twice Daily Versus Intravenous Liposomal Doxorubicin Given Monthly in Patients With Advanced BRCA1- or BRCA2-Associated Ovarian Cancer Who Have Failed Previous Platinum-based Chemotherapy
Brief Summary: The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of 2 doses of drug AZD2281 against liposomal doxorubicin to see which is effective and well tolerated in treating patients with measurable BRCA1- or BRCA2-positive advanced ovarian cancer and who have failed previous platinum therapy.


Options:
A: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) (Randomization to Progressive Disease (PD) or Date of Death (Up to 35 Months))
B: Progression Free Survival (PFS) (Tumour assessment was to be assessed at screening, every 8 weeks during the study and at the withdrawal visit, up to 56 weeks. (Data cut-off for primary analysis of PFS: 15 September 2009))
C: Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities of Cediranib Maleate in Combination With Olaparib (Phase I) (At 28 days); The Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Cediranib in Combination With Olaparib in the Treatment of Recurrent Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Peritoneal Cancer or Metastatic Triple-negative Breast Cancer (Phase I) (At 28 Days); Progression-free Survival (PFS) at the Maximum Tolerated Dose/Recommended Phase 2 Dose of Cediranib Maleate With Olaparib Compared to That of Olaparib Alone (Phase II) (Time from start of treatment to time of objective disease progression, assessed up to 5 years); The Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Cediranib in Combination With Olaparib Tablet Formulation in the Treatment of Recurrent Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Peritoneal Cancer (Phase I-T). (At 28 days)
D: Progression-free survival based on investigator assessment using RECIST and clinical findings (Assessed within 12 months following completion of accrual)

Answer: B
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: A Phase II, Open-Label, Randomised, Comparative, International Multicentre Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Different Doses of AZD2281 Given Orally Twice Daily Versus Intravenous Liposomal Doxorubicin Given Monthly in Patients With Advanced BRCA1- or BRCA2-Associated Ovarian Cancer Who Have Failed Previous Platinum-based Chemotherapy
Brief Summary: The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of 2 doses of drug AZD2281 against liposomal doxorubicin to see which is effective and well tolerated in treating patients with measurable BRCA1- or BRCA2-positive advanced ovarian cancer and who have failed previous platinum therapy.


Options:
A: To determine if AMG 386 plus PLD is superior to placebo plus PLD as measured by progression-free survival, defined as the time from randomization to the earliest of the dates of first radiologic disease progression per RECIST 1.1 with modifications (Radiological imaging will be performed 8 weeks ± 1 week, starting from date of randomization for the first 64 weeks, then every 16 weeks ± 1 week for the next 32 weeks, and then every 24 weeks ± 4 weeks thereafter.)
B: Progression Free Survival (PFS) (Tumour assessment was to be assessed at screening, every 8 weeks during the study and at the withdrawal visit, up to 56 weeks. (Data cut-off for primary analysis of PFS: 15 September 2009))
C: Disease Progression According to RECIST Version 1.1, as Assessed by the Investigator, or Death From Any Cause (Investigator Progression Free Survival as Per invPFS) (Every 12 calendar weeks (within 7 days prior is permitted) after start of treatment until treatment discontinuation due to disease progression. Total follow-up was up to approximately 3 years.)
D: Progression Free Survival Determined Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 Criteria (The protocol required lesion assessments every 9 weeks from cycle 1, day 1 for the first year, then every 12 weeks thereafter until disease progression. An average of approximately 10 months.)

Answer: B
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: A Phase II, Open-Label, Randomised, Comparative, International Multicentre Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Different Doses of AZD2281 Given Orally Twice Daily Versus Intravenous Liposomal Doxorubicin Given Monthly in Patients With Advanced BRCA1- or BRCA2-Associated Ovarian Cancer Who Have Failed Previous Platinum-based Chemotherapy
Brief Summary: The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of 2 doses of drug AZD2281 against liposomal doxorubicin to see which is effective and well tolerated in treating patients with measurable BRCA1- or BRCA2-positive advanced ovarian cancer and who have failed previous platinum therapy.


Options:
A: 6 Month Progression-free Survival (PFS) (6 months); Objective Tumor Response Based on the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Criteria (Up to 5 years); Frequency and Severity of Adverse Events as Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (CTCAE v3.0) (Up to 5 years)
B: Progression Free Survival (PFS) (Tumour assessment was to be assessed at screening, every 8 weeks during the study and at the withdrawal visit, up to 56 weeks. (Data cut-off for primary analysis of PFS: 15 September 2009))
C: Progression Free Survival (PFS) (According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours [RECIST]) (Radiologic scans performed at baseline then every 12 weeks (+/- 1 week) for the first 60 weeks, then every 24 weeks (+/-1 week) thereafter, assessed maximum up to 14 months.)
D: Tolerability of regimen (4 weeks)

Answer: B
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: A Phase II, Open-Label, Randomised, Comparative, International Multicentre Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Different Doses of AZD2281 Given Orally Twice Daily Versus Intravenous Liposomal Doxorubicin Given Monthly in Patients With Advanced BRCA1- or BRCA2-Associated Ovarian Cancer Who Have Failed Previous Platinum-based Chemotherapy
Brief Summary: The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of 2 doses of drug AZD2281 against liposomal doxorubicin to see which is effective and well tolerated in treating patients with measurable BRCA1- or BRCA2-positive advanced ovarian cancer and who have failed previous platinum therapy.


Options:
A: Progression Free Survival (PFS) (from date of randomisation to date of progression or death, which ever occurs earlier. Assessed up to 5 years 3 months)
B: objective response rate (one year)
C: Median Progression-free Survival (PFS) in each study arm (average of 18 months)
D: Progression Free Survival (PFS) (Tumour assessment was to be assessed at screening, every 8 weeks during the study and at the withdrawal visit, up to 56 weeks. (Data cut-off for primary analysis of PFS: 15 September 2009))

Answer: D
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: A Phase II, Open-Label, Randomised, Comparative, International Multicentre Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Different Doses of AZD2281 Given Orally Twice Daily Versus Intravenous Liposomal Doxorubicin Given Monthly in Patients With Advanced BRCA1- or BRCA2-Associated Ovarian Cancer Who Have Failed Previous Platinum-based Chemotherapy
Brief Summary: The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of 2 doses of drug AZD2281 against liposomal doxorubicin to see which is effective and well tolerated in treating patients with measurable BRCA1- or BRCA2-positive advanced ovarian cancer and who have failed previous platinum therapy.


Options:
A: Efficacy by progression free survival (PFS1) (phase up to a total of 15 months)
B: Tumour Response Rate (Tumour assessments carried out at baseline ie 28 days before first study drug dose and then every 8 weeks up to 6 months after starting study treatment, then every 12 weeks until objective disease progression, assessed maximum up to 29 months)
C: Progression Free Survival (PFS) Using Investigator Assessment According to Modified Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (RECIST 1.1) (Radiologic scans performed at baseline then every ~12 weeks up to 72 weeks, then every ~ 24 weeks thereafter until objective radiological disease progression. Assessed until 19 Sep 2016 DCO (16 Jan 2017 DCO for China Cohort); up to a maximum of 36 months.)
D: Progression Free Survival (PFS) (Tumour assessment was to be assessed at screening, every 8 weeks during the study and at the withdrawal visit, up to 56 weeks. (Data cut-off for primary analysis of PFS: 15 September 2009))

Answer: D
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: Pivotal/Phase III Multicentered, Two-Arm, Randomized Study Comparing the Effects of AAT-023 Solution (Zuragen), and Heparin on the Incidence of Catheter Related Blood Stream Infections in Tunneled Chronic Central Venous Catheters for Dialysis
Brief Summary: The purpose of this study is to determine if AAT-023 (Zuragen) solution is superior to Heparin in preventing Catheter Related Blood Stream Infections for End Stage Renal Disease patients.


Options:
A: To show that AAT-023 (Zuragen) solution is superior to Heparin in preventing CRBSI when used as a catheter lock solution in CVCD's between hemodialysis treatments. (6 months)
B: Evaluation of the prevalence of symptomatic or asymptomatic deep venous thrombosis in cancer patients with implantable device for central venous access with or without prophylaxis : (Day90); Low molecular weight Heparin (LMWH) 2500 U anti-XA/day or Warfarine 1 mg/day during the first line of chemotherapy (Day90)
C: Documentation of Serious Adverse Events (SAE) with the use of a 30% ethanol / 4% sodium citrate catheter locking solution. (6 months)
D: time between episodes of central line infection in one patient

Answer: A
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: Pivotal/Phase III Multicentered, Two-Arm, Randomized Study Comparing the Effects of AAT-023 Solution (Zuragen), and Heparin on the Incidence of Catheter Related Blood Stream Infections in Tunneled Chronic Central Venous Catheters for Dialysis
Brief Summary: The purpose of this study is to determine if AAT-023 (Zuragen) solution is superior to Heparin in preventing Catheter Related Blood Stream Infections for End Stage Renal Disease patients.


Options:
A: time between episodes of central line infection in one patient
B: Documentation of Serious Adverse Events (SAE) with the use of a 30% ethanol / 4% sodium citrate catheter locking solution. (6 months)
C: Evaluation of the prevalence of symptomatic or asymptomatic deep venous thrombosis in cancer patients with implantable device for central venous access with or without prophylaxis : (Day90); Low molecular weight Heparin (LMWH) 2500 U anti-XA/day or Warfarine 1 mg/day during the first line of chemotherapy (Day90)
D: To show that AAT-023 (Zuragen) solution is superior to Heparin in preventing CRBSI when used as a catheter lock solution in CVCD's between hemodialysis treatments. (6 months)

Answer: D
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: Integrating Prenatal Care to Reduce HIV/STDs Among Teens: A Translational Study
Brief Summary: This study will evaluate the effectiveness of CenteringPregnancy Plus, a group prenatal care treatment program with an HIV/sexually transmitted disease prevention component, in reducing health risk behaviors in pregnant teenagers seeking services at Community Health Centers in the New York metropolitan area.


Options:
A: Mean change in Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale (EPDS) Scores from baseline to post intervention and 1-month follow-up (Post-treatment and 1-month follow-up and an equivalent time frame for the TAU group)
B: Reduction in perinatal and neonatal mortality (3 years)
C: Sexual behavior risk (Measured at 2nd and 3rd trimesters and Months 6 and 12 postpartum); Lab tested STDs (Measured at 3rd trimester); Rapid repeat pregnancy (Measured at Months 6 and 12 postpartum); Low birthweight (Measured at delivery); Preterm labor (Measured at delivery); Breastfeeding (Measured at Months 6 and 12 postpartum)
D: Infant Gestational Age (Time of delivery)

Answer: C
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: A 12-week, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Multi-national, Phase III, Efficacy and Safety Study of Inhaled Formoterol 4.5 μg and 9 μg Twice Daily in Japanese and European Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Brief Summary: The purpose of this study is to show the efficacy and safety of formoterol for the maintenance treatment of patients with COPD compared with placebo in patients in Japan and in European countries during 12 weeks.


Options:
A: Change From Baseline Trough in 24-hour Weighted-mean FEV1 on Treatment Day 84 (Baseline (Day 1) and Day 84)
B: FEV1 AUC0-3h Response (baseline and 12 weeks); Trough FEV1 Response (Change From Baseline) (baseline and 12 weeks); St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score Based on Data From This Individual Study (12 weeks treatment); St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score Based on Combined Dataset From This Study and the Replicate Study NCT01964352 (12 weeks treatment)
C: Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1; L) 60 Minutes Post-dose (from baseline up to 12 weeks)
D: Annual Rate of On-treatment Moderate/Severe Exacerbations Comparing FF/UMEC/VI With UMEC/VI and FF/VI (Up to Week 52)

Answer: C
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: A 12-week, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Multi-national, Phase III, Efficacy and Safety Study of Inhaled Formoterol 4.5 μg and 9 μg Twice Daily in Japanese and European Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Brief Summary: The purpose of this study is to show the efficacy and safety of formoterol for the maintenance treatment of patients with COPD compared with placebo in patients in Japan and in European countries during 12 weeks.


Options:
A: Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second measured at 2 h post dosing following 24 weeks treatment
B: Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1; L) 60 Minutes Post-dose (from baseline up to 12 weeks)
C: Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Assessed by Spirometry 24 Hour Post Dose After 12 Weeks of Treatment (after 12 weeks of treatment)
D: All cause mortality at 3 years

Answer: B