Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: N/A
Brief Summary: The present research aims at examining the effectiveness of a specific set of therapist relational interventions and attitudes, called the Motive-Oriented Therapeutic Relationship (MOTR), based on Plan Analysis (Caspar, 2007) in the early-phase treatment of patients diagnosed with Borderline Personality Disorder.

The investigators intend to include N = 80 outpatients diagnosed with Borderline Personality Disorder, consulting at the Outpatient Personality Disorder Program of the Karl Jaspers Clinical Unit, in collaboration with the Institute of Psychotherapy, at the Department of Psychiatry-CHUV, University of Lausanne and in collaboration with the University of Berne, Switzerland. Patients are assigned by chance to two treatment conditions 1) Control condition (General Psychiatric Management; Gunderson \& Links, 2008) and 2) MOTR-condition. The investigators hypothesize better results in the MOTR-condition, as compared to the control condition in terms of symptom reduction pre-post.

The conduct of the study represents a significant contribution to the understanding and enhancement of relationship aspects in the treatment of patients diagnosed with Borderline Personality Disorder which may be of potential benefit for these patients.


Options:
A: N/A
B: The acceptability of the intervention to patients (within 6 months of study completion); The feasibility of intervention delivery at the ER setting (within 6 months of study completion); Patient recruitment (Baseline); The proportion of participating patients who can be reached by telephone contact at the 3-month follow-up. (3 months); The proportion of participating patients who can be reached by telephone contact at the 6-month follow-up. (6 months); The proportion of participating patients who can be traced from the hospital record at the 3-month. (3 months); The proportion of participating patients who can be traced from the hospital record at the 6-month. (6 months); The proportion of participating patients whose identity card number can be linked to the nationwide self-harm registry at the 6-month. (6 months); The proportion of participating patients whose identity card number can be linked to the nationwide self-harm registry at the 3-month. (3 months); Change in scores on a self-report suicidal behaviors assessment from baseline to 3 months (Baseline, 3 months); Change in scores on a self-report suicidal behaviors assessment from baseline to 6 months (Baseline, 6 months); Number of repeat self-harm episodes per person in 3 months after intervention based on hospital records (3 months); Number of repeat self-harm episodes per person in 3 months after intervention recorded in the nationwide self-harm registry (3 months); Number of repeat self-harm episodes per person in 6 months after intervention based on hospital records (6 months); Number of repeat self-harm episodes per person in 6 months after intervention recorded in the nationwide self-harm registry (6 months); Time to next self-harm repetition (in days) following randomization (6 months)
C: Outcome Questionnaire -45.2 (Lambert et al., 2004) (3 months)
D: Frequency of subsequent episodes of deliberate self harm and time elapsed to future episodes of deliberate self harm (16 weeks and 68 weeks); Severity of suicidal ideation, level of depressive symptoms (16 weeks and 68 weeks)

Answer: C