TrialPanorama/Dataset huggingface dataset:
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: A Twelve-Week, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized, Multicenter Study With Follow-up Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Varenicline Tartrate ( CP-526,555) in Comparison to Zyban for Smoking Cessation
Brief Summary: The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of varenicline given for a twelve week treatment period in comparison with placebo and Zyban for smoking cessation.


Options:
A: Days of abstinence following the programmed lapse (7 days)
B: Number of Subjects With a 4 Week Continuous Quit Rate (CQR) From Smokeless Tobacco (Weeks 9 through 12)
C: Biochemically/pharmacologically-confirmed 12-month continuous abstinence as evidenced by self-reports of nonsmoking status in all interviews (i.e., at 3, 6, and 12 months) (12 months)
D: 4 week Continuous Quit Rate ( 4 week CQR ) for weeks 9 -12

Answer: D
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: A Twelve-Week, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized, Multicenter Study With Follow-up Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Varenicline Tartrate ( CP-526,555) in Comparison to Zyban for Smoking Cessation
Brief Summary: The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of varenicline given for a twelve week treatment period in comparison with placebo and Zyban for smoking cessation.


Options:
A: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) (Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment or up to Week 16); Number of Participants With Psychiatric Adverse Events (Baseline up to Week 24); Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS): Total Score (Baseline to Week 12); Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS): Total Score (Baseline to Week 24); Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS): Positive Symptoms Score (Baseline to Week 12); Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS): Positive Symptoms Score (Baseline to Week 24); Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS): Negative Symptoms Score (Baseline to Week 12); Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS): Negative Symptoms Score (Baseline to Week 24); Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Simpson Angus Rating Scale (SARS) (Baseline to Week 12); Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Simpson Angus Rating Scale (SARS) (Baseline to Week 24); Number of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and / or Ideation ("Yes" Response) on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) During the Treatment Phase (Week 1 to Week 12 (Treatment phase)); Number of Participants With Suicidal Behavior or Suicical Ideation ("Yes" Response ) on the Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) During the Post Treatment Phase (Week 13 to Week 24 (Post treatment phase)); Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 12 in Clinical Global Impressions Scale-Severity (CGI-S) Score (Baseline (Bsl) to Week 12); Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 24 in Clinical Global Impressions Scale-Severity (CGI-S) Score (Baseline to Week 24); Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Improvement Scale (CGI-I) Score at Week 1 (Baseline, Week 1); Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Improvement Scale (CGI-I) Score at Week 12 (Baseline, Week 12); Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Improvement Scale (CGI-I) Score at Week 24 (Baseline, Week 24)
B: Biochemically verified 7 day point prevalence abstinence from smoking.
C: 4 week Continuous Quit Rate ( 4 week CQR ) for weeks 9 -12
D: Rating of Urges to Smoke 24 Hours and One Week After the Target Quit Date Assessed by Mood and Physical Symptoms Scale (24 hours and 7 days after quit date (week 4))

Answer: C
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: A Twelve-Week, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized, Multicenter Study With Follow-up Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Varenicline Tartrate ( CP-526,555) in Comparison to Zyban for Smoking Cessation
Brief Summary: The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of varenicline given for a twelve week treatment period in comparison with placebo and Zyban for smoking cessation.


Options:
A: Number of Participants Not Smoking in the Previous 7 Days, Confirmed by Expired Carbon Monoxide Reading < 10 Parts Per Million at Week 52 (7-day point prevalence)
B: Change in smoking status over time (At 12, 26, and 52 weeks following start of treatment)
C: Primary efficacy and Safety endpoint: (within 12 month from enrollment)
D: 4 week Continuous Quit Rate ( 4 week CQR ) for weeks 9 -12

Answer: D
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: A Twelve-Week, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized, Multicenter Study With Follow-up Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Varenicline Tartrate ( CP-526,555) in Comparison to Zyban for Smoking Cessation
Brief Summary: The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of varenicline given for a twelve week treatment period in comparison with placebo and Zyban for smoking cessation.


Options:
A: Smoking Abstinence (3 months); Smoking Abstinence (6 months); Smoking Abstinence (12 months)
B: 4 week Continuous Quit Rate ( 4 week CQR ) for weeks 9 -12
C: Smoking cessation (point prevalence, both self reported as biochemical verified) (12 months)
D: Continuous 4-week Abstinence From Smoking Between Weeks 8-11 After the Quit Date (Through the End of Treatment) (weeks 8-11 after quit date)

Answer: B
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: A 10-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Pregabalin (150 mg - 600 mg/Day) Using a Flexible, Optimized Dose Schedule in Subjects With Peripheral Neuropathic Pain
Brief Summary: To evaluate the efficacy of pregabalin, using a flexible, optimized dose schedule with dose adjustment based on Daily Pain Rating Scale (DPRS), compared to placebo in subjects with peripheral neuropathic pain.


Options:
A: Daily Evening Patient Reported Pain Intensity Scores (Baseline and 6 Weeks)
B: The primary efficacy parameter is the endpoint mean pain score based on the pain scores from the subject's daily pain diaries.
C: Daily Pain Rating Scale (DPRS)- Mean Pain Score (ITT Population) (Endpoint- Week 8 or Early Discontinuation)
D: Mean Change From Baseline to Week 5 in Average Daily Pain Score (ADPS) Following Treatment With DS-5565 Compared to Pregabalin and Placebo (Baseline up to Week 5 postdose, up to 10 months total follow up)

Answer: C
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Flexible-Dose, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Toleration of Oral Sildenafil Citrate Administered in the Dose Range of 20 - 80 Mg TID for the Treatment of Pre-Eclampsia. (PET)
Brief Summary: To determine the efficacy and safety of sildenafil citrate in the treatment of established pre-eclampsia


Options:
A: improvement of the Doppler indices following treatment (9 months)
B: Intact neonatal survival until term age (Term age, up to 20 weeks after randomization)
C: The principal outcome is birth weight at delivery and neonatal morbidity (Crib Score) (6 weeks)
D: Primary endpoint is the time from randomization to delivery.

Answer: D
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: CS-866DM Phase 3 Clinical Study: A Double-Blind Controlled Trial in Patients With Diabetic Nephropathy and Overt Proteinuria Secondary to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Brief Summary: The purpose of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of olmesartan versus placebo on the progression of diabetic renal disease.


Options:
A: Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Progression to Diabetes - Valsartan Versus Non-valsartan (Mean patient duration of 4.2 years); Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Extended Morbidity and Mortality Event - Valsartan Versus Non-valsartan (Mean patient duration of 5.6 years); Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Core Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality Event - Valsartan Versus Non-valsartan (Mean patient duration of 5.8 years); Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Progression to Diabetes - Nateglinide Versus Non-nateglinide (Mean patient duration of 4.2 years); Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Extended Morbidity and Mortality Event - Nateglinide Versus Non-nateglinide (Mean patient duration of 5.6 years); Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Core Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality Event - Nateglinide Versus Non-nateglinide (Mean patient duration of 5.8 years)
B: diabetes; death
C: Renal Composite Outcomes (Randomization to 5 years)
D: The composite of; Cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke. (Biannually); The composite of; cardiovascular death, resuscitated cardiac arrest, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, heart failure, arterial revascularizations (Biannually)

Answer: C
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: CS-866DM Phase 3 Clinical Study: A Double-Blind Controlled Trial in Patients With Diabetic Nephropathy and Overt Proteinuria Secondary to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Brief Summary: The purpose of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of olmesartan versus placebo on the progression of diabetic renal disease.


Options:
A: ONTARGET. Composite Endpoint of Cardiovascular Death, Non-fatal Myocardial Infarction, Non-fatal Stroke and Hospitalization for Congestive Heart Failure (56 months); ONTARGET. 3-fold Composite Endpoint of Doubling of Serum Creatinine, Progression to End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) and All-cause Mortality in Diabetic Nephropathy Patients (56 months); TRANSCEND. Composite Endpoint of Cardiovascular Death, Non-fatal Myocardial Infarction, Non-fatal Stroke and Hospitalization for Congestive Heart Failure (56 months)
B: Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Progression to Diabetes - Valsartan Versus Non-valsartan (Mean patient duration of 4.2 years); Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Extended Morbidity and Mortality Event - Valsartan Versus Non-valsartan (Mean patient duration of 5.6 years); Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Core Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality Event - Valsartan Versus Non-valsartan (Mean patient duration of 5.8 years); Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Progression to Diabetes - Nateglinide Versus Non-nateglinide (Mean patient duration of 4.2 years); Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Extended Morbidity and Mortality Event - Nateglinide Versus Non-nateglinide (Mean patient duration of 5.6 years); Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Core Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality Event - Nateglinide Versus Non-nateglinide (Mean patient duration of 5.8 years)
C: Renal Composite Outcomes (Randomization to 5 years)
D: Incidence of hypertension, by blood pressure ≥ 140/90 mmHg in individuals without diabetes or ≥ 135/85 mmHg in participants with diabetes. (18 months); Adverse events. (18 months); Development or worsening of microalbuminuria and of left ventricular hypertrophy in the EKG (18 months)

Answer: C
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: Cost Effectiveness of Two Different Implementation Procedures to Change Clinicians Practice Roles in the Detection of Hereditary Colorectal Cancer
Brief Summary: The purpose of this study is to compare two different strategies to implement a new method to identify patients with HNPCC, which appeared cost-effective and feasible. The effectiveness, costs and feasibility of both of the implementation strategies will be assessed.


Options:
A: Extent of guideline adherence after approximately one year (measured by a specific set of guideline-derived indicators, formulated beforehand by the research group) (half year after intervention); Costs of both Implementation strategies (half year after intervention)
B: Rate of LDL cholesterol control (< 100 mg/dL) (12 months); Rate of blood pressure control (< 130/80 mmHg) (12 months); Rate of HbA1c control (<7%) (12 months)
C: Outcome and process measures from the danish diabetes guideline (1/3 2007-1/6 2008)
D: Efficacy of inclusion of eligible CRC-patients for MSI testing by pathologists.; Efficacy of referral of patients who are MSI positive to a clinical geneticist by surgeons.

Answer: D
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: A Study Looking at the Effects of a Modest Reduction in Dietary Salt Intake on Blood Pressure Control in Haemodialysis Patients
Brief Summary: High blood pressure (hypertension) affects up to 80% of all patients receiving haemodialysis for chronic kidney disease (CKD). High blood pressure is a major cause cardiovascular disease (i.e. strokes, heart attacks and heart failure) and, thereby, cardiovascular deaths in these patients.

A significant cause of raised blood pressure in haemodialysis patients is thought to be due to retention of salt in the body. In healthy people the kidneys excrete salt but the kidneys of patients with CKD cannot do this, so salt has to be removed by dialysis. However dialysis cannot remove as much salt as is necessary, and so it accumulates. This fact has been recognized for many years, and health professionals caring for haemodialysis patients often stress the importance of restriction of dietary salt intake.

However no research has looked in detail at the mechanisms by which salt raises blood pressure in haemodialysis patients. It is likely that salt directly affects thirst, causing patients to drink more and become overloaded with fluid. In addition, salt may have direct effects on the blood vessel wall, causing failure of adequate blood vessel relaxation. Both of these factors may raise blood pressure.

We will conduct a carefully controlled crossover study looking at the effects of a modest reduction in salt intake on BP. During the course of the study, which will last eight weeks, patients will receive both a 5 gram per day and a 10 gram per day salt intake. We will look at how thirst, fluid intake, a number of markers of blood vessel function and blood pressure differ on these two salt intakes.


Options:
A: 24-hour Urinary Sodium Excretion (1 month); 24-hour Urinary Salt Excretion (1 month)
B: Office systolic and diastolic BP readings (9 months)
C: Change in 24-hour urinary creatinine clearance from baseline to final follow-up, measured from 24-hour urinary collection and corresponding serum creatinine measurement at randomisation and final visit. (24 months)
D: Change in pre-dialysis systolic blood pressure

Answer: D
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: RAAS, Inflammation, and Post-operative AF
Brief Summary: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent, sustained type of irregular heartbeat and affects over 2 million Americans. Post-operative AF, which leads to significant morbidity and a prolonged hospital stay, complicates 20% to 40% of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surgical procedures. While recent studies indicate that interruption of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system by either angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition or AT1 receptor antagonism decreases the incidence of AF following a heart attack or cardioversion (electric shock to the heart), its effect on the incidence of post-operative AF has not been throughly studied. Studies in both animals and humans suggest that inflammation-induced atrial remodeling plays an important role in the cause of AF. Recent studies also provide evidence that activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system induces inflammation, myocyte injury, proarrhythmic electrical remodeling, and fibrosis through aldosterone.


Options:
A: left ventricular hypertrophy (3 months)
B: Change in left ventricular ejection fraction, as assessed by cardiac MRI (Baseline and end of study (up to 72 weeks))
C: Doubling of Interstitium or Any ESRD (Baseline to 5 years)
D: Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation (Measured from admission to the ICU until discharge from hospital)

Answer: D
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: A Multicenter, Randomized, Open Label, Single, and Multiple Dose Study of the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of 2 Dose Levels of Pantoprazole Sodium in Children Aged 1 Through 11 Years With Endoscopically Proven GERD
Brief Summary: The purpose of this study is to characterize the PK profile, safety and tolerability of single and multiple doses of pantoprazole in children aged 1 through 11 years with endoscopically proven GERD.


Options:
A: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) (Predose (0 hour), and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 hours postdose); Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) (Predose (0 hour), and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 hours postdose); Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration [AUC (0-t)] (Predose (0 hour), and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 hours postdose); Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time [AUC (0 - ∞)] (Predose (0 hour), and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 hours postdose); Plasma Decay Half-Life (t1/2) (Predose (0 hour), and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 hours postdose); Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) (Predose (0 hour), and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 hours postdose); Terminal-Phase Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) (Predose (0 hour), and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 hours postdose); Plasma Concentrations After Multiple Doses (Hours 2 and 4 on Day 7)
B: Peak Concentration (Cmax) (1 day); Time to Peak Concentration (Tmax) Profile (1 day); Disposition Half-life (1 day); Area Under the Concentration-time Curve (AUC) (1 day); Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) (1 day); Pantoprazole Plasma Concentration After Multiple-Dose Oral Administration (7 days); Intragastric pH (7 days); Median Intragastric pH (7 days); Percentage of Time Intragastric pH Was >4 (7 days); Mean Intraesophageal pH (7 days); Median Intraesophageal pH (7 days); Percentage of Time That Intraesophageal pH Was <4 (7 days); Normalized Area of Gastric Hydrogen Ion Activity Over Time (7 days); Normalized Area of Esophageal Hydrogen Ion Activity Over Time (7 days)
C: Number of Participants Discontinuing Due to Symptom Worsening in the Randomized Treatment Withdrawal Phase (Treatment Withdrawal Phase Endpoint) (Treatment-withdrawal phase (up to 4 weeks following randomization, or until earlier discontinuation from the study))
D: Change From Baseline in Normalized Number of GERD Events Observed From Video and Cardiorespiratory Monitoring (Baseline and end of treatment (10-14 days))

Answer: A
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: A Multicenter, Randomized, Open Label, Single, and Multiple Dose Study of the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of 2 Dose Levels of Pantoprazole Sodium in Children Aged 1 Through 11 Years With Endoscopically Proven GERD
Brief Summary: The purpose of this study is to characterize the PK profile, safety and tolerability of single and multiple doses of pantoprazole in children aged 1 through 11 years with endoscopically proven GERD.


Options:
A: Number of Participants Discontinuing Due to Symptom Worsening in the Randomized Treatment Withdrawal Phase (Treatment Withdrawal Phase Endpoint) (Treatment-withdrawal phase (up to 4 weeks following randomization, or until earlier discontinuation from the study))
B: Percentage of subjects in each treatment group responding to treatment with a reduction from baseline in the percentage and duration of crying/fussing/irritability episodes associated with feeding after 4 weeks of treatment. (Week 4); Safety Assessments (Baseline through week 8)
C: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) (Predose (0 hour), and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 hours postdose); Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) (Predose (0 hour), and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 hours postdose); Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration [AUC (0-t)] (Predose (0 hour), and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 hours postdose); Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time [AUC (0 - ∞)] (Predose (0 hour), and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 hours postdose); Plasma Decay Half-Life (t1/2) (Predose (0 hour), and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 hours postdose); Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) (Predose (0 hour), and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 hours postdose); Terminal-Phase Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) (Predose (0 hour), and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 hours postdose); Plasma Concentrations After Multiple Doses (Hours 2 and 4 on Day 7)
D: Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) Pharmacokinetic Parameter (After 7 days of dosing.); Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration Pharmacokinetic Parameter. (After 7 days of dosing.); AUC(0-tlqc): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration Pharmacokinetic Parameter. (After 7 days of dosing.); AUC(0-24): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to 24 Hours Postdose Pharmacokinetic Parameter. (After 7 days of dosing.); Terminal Phase Elimination Half-life (T1/2) Pharmacokinetic Parameter. (After 7 days of dosing.); Oral Clearance (CL/F) Pharmacokinetic Parameter. (After 7 days of dosing.); Terminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz) Pharmacokinetic Parameter. (After 7 days of dosing.); Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) Pharmacokinetic Parameter. (After 7 days of dosing.)

Answer: C
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: A Randomized Trial of Two Regimens of Misoprostol for Second Trimester Intrauterine Fetal Death
Brief Summary: Misoprostol (Cytotec®) is a synthetic prostaglandin E1 analog that has been marketed in the United States since 1988 as a gastric cytoprotective agent. Despite a focused campaign by the manufacturer to curtail its use in obstetric practice, misoprostol has, over the past several years, gained widespread acceptance to effect the medical termination of pregnancy in the second trimester, either alone or after pretreatment with mifepristone. The primary reasons for this prompt incorporation into standard practice include its low cost and the lack of stringent storage requirements.

Vaginal administration seems to be more efficacious than when given orally. The use of sublingual misoprostol for first trimester abortions has been extensively investigated as evidenced by the large number of publications comparing sublingual to other routes of misoprostol for first trimester pregnancy termination, on the assumption that the sublingual route would have a similar efficacy of the vaginal route. In addition, the sublingual route would combine an easier administration with the added advantage of no restriction of mobility after administration. There has been no previous report in the literature comparing the use of misoprostol given sublingually to that given vaginally for the second trimester termination following intrauterine fetal death. Our aim is to compare efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction with misoprostol given vaginally (the current standard) to that given sublingually.


Options:
A: Completeness of abortion: expulsion of Products of conception (POC)x by visual inspection (7 days)
B: The number of patients with complete miscarriage at 1 week. (1 week)
C: Progressive intrauterine pregnancy > 22 WA (Until 2 years post surgery)
D: -The main outcome measures will be the induction time, defined as the time from placement of the first dose of misoprostol until the time of delivery of the fetus. (48 hours)

Answer: D