Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: Evaluation of Two Mental Health Interventions Based on the Community for Violence-Displaced Afro-Descendants in Colombia.
Brief Summary: This study is a community prevention randomized trial with three parallel groups: two intervention groups and one control group in Buenaventura and Quibdó.

The aim of the trial is to evaluate the impact of two community interventions on mental health; the intervention groups are designed to decrease depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorders symptoms as well as the level of dysfunctionality in Afro-Colombian victims of violence.

Adult people (equal or more than 18 years old) belonging to Afro-Colombian communities in both cities will participate in the enter survey. The subjects will be selected based on the severity of symptoms, traumatic experiences and a level of dysfunction identified using the instruments of this research (i.e. those obtaining an score equal or higher than 49 in symptoms (25% of the total of symptoms)).

The fieldwork and the interventions will be conducted by people belonging to the community; they are called Lay Psychosocial Community Workers (LPCW). After six (6) weeks of formal training, they will be able to perform two kinds of interventions, Common Elements Treatment Approach (CETA) based on a cognitive behavioral intervention and Narrative Community Group Therapy (NCGT), for the people affected by violence and displacement that were pre-selected according to the baseline instrument.

The LPCW will be under the constant supervision by psychologists of the project, and under weekly supervision by a group of experts from Johns Hopkins University, the Heartland Alliance and The Institute for Research and Development in Violence Prevention and Promotion of Peaceful Coexistence Social (CISALVA) by means of phone calls or monthly visits to the cities. Selected subjects will be randomly allocated to any study branch: CETA, NCGT or the waiting control group.

The study subjects will follow their allocated treatment, or waiting in the control group, for 8 to 12 weeks; then they will be re-assessed using the project instrument two weeks after the last session of therapy.

The study outcome is the differences in instrument scores between the follow-up and the baseline among the interventions (CETA or NCGT) and control group.

Control subjects will be assessed by the project psychologist after the follow-up, and they will receive treatment when necessary.


Options:
A: Stunting (One year starting with baseline (August-September 2014) and finishing with end line (September 2015); Amendment: also measured at year two (extension) endline); Cognitive function (End line (after one year); Amendment: BSID-III at year two (extension) endline)
B: Change from baseline post traumatic stress symptoms at 6 months (baseline and 6 month follow up); Change from baseline depression symptoms at 6 months (baseline and 6 month follow up); Change from baseline hope at 6 months (baseline and 6 month follow up)
C: Change of depression symptom from baseline at 3 and 6 months (0-3-6 months); Change of anxiety symptom from baseline at 3 and 6 months (0-3-6 months); Change of chronic pain symptom from baseline at 3 and 6 months (0-3-6 months); Change of anger from baseline at 3 and 6 months (0-3-6 months); Change of PTSD symptom from baseline at 3 and 6 months (0-3-6 months)
D: Score Difference in Symptoms of Anxiety, Depression and Post-traumatic Stress Disorders. (Within the fifteen (15) days after finishing the intervention, either Common Elements Treatment Approach (CETA) or Narrative Community Group Therapy (NCGT). In the control group, 12 weeks after the baseline assessment.)

Answer: D