TrialPanorama/Dataset huggingface dataset:
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: A Phase 3, Active (Warfarin) Controlled, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Arm Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Apixaban in Preventing Stroke and Systemic Embolism in Subjects With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation
Brief Summary: The trial seeks to determine if apixaban, an investigational anticoagulant (blood-thinner) is as effective as standard therapy (warfarin) in preventing stroke and systemic embolism in subjects with atrial fibrillation and risk factors for stroke.


Options:
A: The Composite Event of Stroke/Non-CNS Systemic Embolism: Primary Efficacy (Non-Inferiority) (Up to 4 years); The Composite of Event of Stroke/Non-CNS Systemic Embolism: Primary Efficacy (Superiority) (Up to 4 years); The Composite Event of Major/Non-major Clinically Relevant Bleeding Events: Primary Safety (Up to 4 years)
B: Number of Participants With Recurrent Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) and Deaths Related to VTE (For statistical analysis 1: from randomisation to end of post treatment period (ptp), planned to be up to day 224. For statistical analysis 2: from randomisation to 6 months (up to day 180))
C: Compare Edoxaban to Warfarin for Composite of Stroke and Systemic Embolic Events (SEE). (on-treatment period 2.5 years of median study drug exposure and 2.8 year of median follow-up); Compare Edoxaban to Warfarin for Composite of Stroke and Systemic Embolic Events (SEE). (overall study period 2.5 years of median study drug exposure and 2.8 year of median follow-up); Compare Edoxaban to Warfarin for Composite of Stroke and Systemic Embolic Events (SEE). (on-treatment period 2.5 years of median study drug exposure and 2.8 year of median follow-up); Compare Edoxaban to Warfarin for Composite of Stroke and Systemic Embolic Events (SEE). (overall study period 2.5 years of median study drug exposure and 2.8 year of median follow-up); Compare Edoxaban to Warfarin for Superiority for Composite of Stroke and Systemic Embolic Events (SEE). (overall study period 2.5 years of median study drug exposure and 2.8 year of median follow-up)
D: Number of Participants With First Event of Ischemic/Unspecified Stroke, Hemorrhagic Stroke, or Systemic Embolism (SE) During the Intended Treatment Period (Time to first event in "Intended Treatment Period": started on day of randomization, ended at efficacy cut-off date (date target number of primary efficacy events [448] was expected to have occurred; set to 30-Jan-2011, prior to unblinding).); Rate of Adjudicated Stroke or Systemic Embolism (SE) During the Intended Treatment Period ("Intended Treatment Period" started on the day of randomization and ended at the efficacy cut-off date (date on which it was expected that the target number of primary efficacy events [448] would have occurred; set to 30-Jan-2011, prior to unblinding).)

Answer: D
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: A Phase 3, Active (Warfarin) Controlled, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Arm Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Apixaban in Preventing Stroke and Systemic Embolism in Subjects With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation
Brief Summary: The trial seeks to determine if apixaban, an investigational anticoagulant (blood-thinner) is as effective as standard therapy (warfarin) in preventing stroke and systemic embolism in subjects with atrial fibrillation and risk factors for stroke.


Options:
A: Number of Participants With First Event of Ischemic/Unspecified Stroke, Hemorrhagic Stroke, or Systemic Embolism (SE) During the Intended Treatment Period (Time to first event in "Intended Treatment Period": started on day of randomization, ended at efficacy cut-off date (date target number of primary efficacy events [448] was expected to have occurred; set to 30-Jan-2011, prior to unblinding).); Rate of Adjudicated Stroke or Systemic Embolism (SE) During the Intended Treatment Period ("Intended Treatment Period" started on the day of randomization and ended at the efficacy cut-off date (date on which it was expected that the target number of primary efficacy events [448] would have occurred; set to 30-Jan-2011, prior to unblinding).)
B: Incidence Rate of the Composite Efficacy Outcome (Adjudicated) (From randomization until the efficacy cut-off date (median 326 days)); Incidence Rate of a Major Bleeding Event According to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) Criteria (Adjudicated) (From randomization until the efficacy cut-off date (median 326 days))
C: Compare Edoxaban to Warfarin for Composite of Stroke and Systemic Embolic Events (SEE). (on-treatment period 2.5 years of median study drug exposure and 2.8 year of median follow-up); Compare Edoxaban to Warfarin for Composite of Stroke and Systemic Embolic Events (SEE). (overall study period 2.5 years of median study drug exposure and 2.8 year of median follow-up); Compare Edoxaban to Warfarin for Composite of Stroke and Systemic Embolic Events (SEE). (on-treatment period 2.5 years of median study drug exposure and 2.8 year of median follow-up); Compare Edoxaban to Warfarin for Composite of Stroke and Systemic Embolic Events (SEE). (overall study period 2.5 years of median study drug exposure and 2.8 year of median follow-up); Compare Edoxaban to Warfarin for Superiority for Composite of Stroke and Systemic Embolic Events (SEE). (overall study period 2.5 years of median study drug exposure and 2.8 year of median follow-up)
D: Rate of symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation (within 5 weeks of treatment initiation)

Answer: A
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: A Randomized, Open-Label, Comparative, Multi -Center Trial to Evaluate Contraceptive Efficacy, Cycle Control, Safety and Acceptability of a Monophasic Combined Oral Contraceptive (COC) Containing 2.5 mg Nomegestrol Acetate (NOMAC) and 1.5 mg Estradiol (E2), Compared to a Monophasic COC Containing 3 mg Drospirenone (DRSP) and 30 µg Ethinyl Estradiol (EE)
Brief Summary: The primary purpose of this study is to assess contraceptive efficacy, vaginal bleeding patterns (cycle control), general safety and acceptability of the nomegestrol acetate-estradiol (NOMAC-E2) combined oral contraceptive (COC) in a large group of women aged 18-50 years.


Options:
A: Patient Response to Treatment for Primary Dysmenorrhea, as Evaluated by Difference of Total Dysmenorrhea Score (Baseline/Pretreatment-End of Treatment) (16weeks)
B: Patient Response to Treatment for Dysmenorrhea, as Evaluated by Difference of Total Dysmenorrhea Score (Baseline/Pretreatment-End of Treatment) (16weeks)
C: Number of In-treatment Pregnancies (With +2 Day Window) Per 100 Woman Years of Exposure (Pearl Index) (1 year (13 cycles)); Number of In-treatment Pregnancies (With +14 Day Window) Per 100 Woman Years of Exposure (Pearl Index) (1 year (13 cycles))
D: Change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score (Baseline and 6 months)

Answer: C
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: A Randomized, Open-Label, Comparative, Multi -Center Trial to Evaluate Contraceptive Efficacy, Cycle Control, Safety and Acceptability of a Monophasic Combined Oral Contraceptive (COC) Containing 2.5 mg Nomegestrol Acetate (NOMAC) and 1.5 mg Estradiol (E2), Compared to a Monophasic COC Containing 3 mg Drospirenone (DRSP) and 30 µg Ethinyl Estradiol (EE)
Brief Summary: The primary purpose of this study is to assess contraceptive efficacy, vaginal bleeding patterns (cycle control), general safety and acceptability of the nomegestrol acetate-estradiol (NOMAC-E2) combined oral contraceptive (COC) in a large group of women aged 18-50 years.


Options:
A: contraceptive continuation (6 months)
B: Adherence Rate (Rate of Perfect Method Use) (For the first 3 months)
C: Number of In-treatment Pregnancies (With +2 Day Window) Per 100 Woman Years of Exposure (Pearl Index) (1 year (13 cycles)); Number of In-treatment Pregnancies (With +14 Day Window) Per 100 Woman Years of Exposure (Pearl Index) (1 year (13 cycles))
D: N/A

Answer: C
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: A Randomized, Open-Label, Comparative, Multi -Center Trial to Evaluate Contraceptive Efficacy, Cycle Control, Safety and Acceptability of a Monophasic Combined Oral Contraceptive (COC) Containing 2.5 mg Nomegestrol Acetate (NOMAC) and 1.5 mg Estradiol (E2), Compared to a Monophasic COC Containing 3 mg Drospirenone (DRSP) and 30 µg Ethinyl Estradiol (EE)
Brief Summary: The primary purpose of this study is to assess contraceptive efficacy, vaginal bleeding patterns (cycle control), general safety and acceptability of the nomegestrol acetate-estradiol (NOMAC-E2) combined oral contraceptive (COC) in a large group of women aged 18-50 years.


Options:
A: Impact on metabolic parameters (e.g. hemostatic parameters) after 6 month treatment (Baseline, Cycle 7)
B: Bleeding pattern (7 treatment cycles each consisting of 28 days); Number of unintended pregnancies (7 treatment cycles each consisting of 28 days and follow-up period of 14 days)
C: Number of In-treatment Pregnancies (With +2 Day Window) Per 100 Woman Years of Exposure (Pearl Index) (1 year (13 cycles)); Number of In-treatment Pregnancies (With +14 Day Window) Per 100 Woman Years of Exposure (Pearl Index) (1 year (13 cycles))
D: N/A

Answer: C
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: A Phase 2B, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study To Compare 6 Dose Regimens Of CP-690,550 Vs. Placebo, Each Combined With Methotrexate, Administered For 6 Months In The Treatment Of Subjects With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Have Had An Inadequate Response To Methotrexate Alone
Brief Summary: The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness and safety, over 6 months, of 6 dose regimens of CP-690,550, combined with methotrexate, for the treatment of adults with active rheumatoid arthritis.


Options:
A: The Number of Participants Achieving Remission As Measured by a Disease Activity Score for 28 Joints (DAS 28) < 2.6. (12 months); Year 1 Participants Having an Annualized Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) < 0.5. (12 months)
B: Double-blind Period: Mean Synovitis Scores at Baseline As Measured by the Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials 6 (OMERACT 6) Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (RAMRIS) (At baseline); Double-blind Period: Mean Change From Baseline in OMERACT 6 Wrist Synovitis Score: Planned Analysis Using Non-Parametric ANCOVA (Baseline to Day 113); Double-blind Period: Mean Change From Baseline in OMERACT 6 Wrist Synovitis Score: Post Hoc Sensitivity Analysis Using Parametric ANCOVA Analysis (Baseline to Day 113)
C: Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Remission (≤2.8) at Both Week 20 and Week 24 (Week 20 and Week 24)
D: Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 (Week 12)

Answer: D
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: A Phase 2B, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study To Compare 6 Dose Regimens Of CP-690,550 Vs. Placebo, Each Combined With Methotrexate, Administered For 6 Months In The Treatment Of Subjects With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Have Had An Inadequate Response To Methotrexate Alone
Brief Summary: The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness and safety, over 6 months, of 6 dose regimens of CP-690,550, combined with methotrexate, for the treatment of adults with active rheumatoid arthritis.


Options:
A: The Proportion of Participants Meeting the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Criteria of 20% Improvement (ACR20) After 12 Months of Treatment - Intent to Treat Population (Day 1 to Day 365)
B: ACR 20% response (Week 14)
C: Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 (Week 12)
D: Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50) Response at Week 24 (Week 24)

Answer: C
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: A Long-term, Open-label Follow-up Study Of Tofacitinib (Cp-690,550) For Treatment Of Rheumatoid Arthritis
Brief Summary: The purpose of this study is to determine the long-term effectiveness and safety of CP-690,550 for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Subjects are eligible for this study only after participating in another "qualifying" study of CP-690,550

A sub-study will be conducted within the A3921024 study, this study will evaluate the immune response to pneumococcal and influenza vaccines in patients receiving CP-690,550


Options:
A: Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Month 6 (Month 6); Changes From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Month 6 (Baseline, Month 6); Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Month 3 (Baseline, Month 3); Percentage of Participant With Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) Less Than 2.6 at Month 6 (Month 6)
B: Adjusted Geometric (Geo) Mean-Fold Change at End of Period 1 From Baseline in Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate (mGFR) (Day 1 of Period 1, Day 43 of Period 1)
C: Change From Baseline in the Volume Transfer Rate From the Blood Plasma to the Enhancing Synovium (Ktrans) (Baseline and week 14)
D: Initial Period: Primary Endpoints Were Standard Laboratory Safety Data (Chemistry, Hematology, Etc.) and Adverse Event (AE) Reports (Includes laboratory test abnormality data for all visits and adverse event data up to 999 days after last dose of study drug); Extension Period: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) (Baseline (Day 1 at Entry of Extension Period) up to 28 days after last study drug dose in Extension Period (13 Months)); Extension Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Baseline (Day 1 at Entry of Extension Period) up to 28 days after last study drug dose in Extension Period (13 Months)); Initial Period: The Long Term Safety and Tolerability of CP-690,550 5 Milligrams (mg) Twice Daily (BID) and 10 mg BID for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis (Includes AEs for every visit and up to 999 days after last dose of study drug); Extension Period: Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events and Who Discontinued Treatment Due to Adverse Events to Assess Long-term Safety and Tolerability of Tofacitinib (Baseline (Day 1 at Entry of Extension Period) up to Month 6 of Extension Period; Month 6 of Extension Period to Month 12 of Extension Period)

Answer: D
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: A Long-term, Open-label Follow-up Study Of Tofacitinib (Cp-690,550) For Treatment Of Rheumatoid Arthritis
Brief Summary: The purpose of this study is to determine the long-term effectiveness and safety of CP-690,550 for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Subjects are eligible for this study only after participating in another "qualifying" study of CP-690,550

A sub-study will be conducted within the A3921024 study, this study will evaluate the immune response to pneumococcal and influenza vaccines in patients receiving CP-690,550


Options:
A: Initial Period: Primary Endpoints Were Standard Laboratory Safety Data (Chemistry, Hematology, Etc.) and Adverse Event (AE) Reports (Includes laboratory test abnormality data for all visits and adverse event data up to 999 days after last dose of study drug); Extension Period: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) (Baseline (Day 1 at Entry of Extension Period) up to 28 days after last study drug dose in Extension Period (13 Months)); Extension Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Baseline (Day 1 at Entry of Extension Period) up to 28 days after last study drug dose in Extension Period (13 Months)); Initial Period: The Long Term Safety and Tolerability of CP-690,550 5 Milligrams (mg) Twice Daily (BID) and 10 mg BID for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis (Includes AEs for every visit and up to 999 days after last dose of study drug); Extension Period: Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events and Who Discontinued Treatment Due to Adverse Events to Assess Long-term Safety and Tolerability of Tofacitinib (Baseline (Day 1 at Entry of Extension Period) up to Month 6 of Extension Period; Month 6 of Extension Period to Month 12 of Extension Period)
B: Double-blind Period: Mean Synovitis Scores at Baseline As Measured by the Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials 6 (OMERACT 6) Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (RAMRIS) (At baseline); Double-blind Period: Mean Change From Baseline in OMERACT 6 Wrist Synovitis Score: Planned Analysis Using Non-Parametric ANCOVA (Baseline to Day 113); Double-blind Period: Mean Change From Baseline in OMERACT 6 Wrist Synovitis Score: Post Hoc Sensitivity Analysis Using Parametric ANCOVA Analysis (Baseline to Day 113)
C: Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50) Response at Week 24 (Week 24)
D: Percentage of patients with ACR 20 response (Week 24); AEs, laboratory parameters, vital signs, ECGs. (Throughout study)

Answer: A
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: A Long-term, Open-label Follow-up Study Of Tofacitinib (Cp-690,550) For Treatment Of Rheumatoid Arthritis
Brief Summary: The purpose of this study is to determine the long-term effectiveness and safety of CP-690,550 for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Subjects are eligible for this study only after participating in another "qualifying" study of CP-690,550

A sub-study will be conducted within the A3921024 study, this study will evaluate the immune response to pneumococcal and influenza vaccines in patients receiving CP-690,550


Options:
A: Change From Baseline to Week 24 in the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) (Baseline to Week 24)
B: American college of Rheumatolofy (ACR)-20 responder rate at Week 24
C: Number of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 Response at Week 14 (Week 0 to Week 14)
D: Initial Period: Primary Endpoints Were Standard Laboratory Safety Data (Chemistry, Hematology, Etc.) and Adverse Event (AE) Reports (Includes laboratory test abnormality data for all visits and adverse event data up to 999 days after last dose of study drug); Extension Period: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) (Baseline (Day 1 at Entry of Extension Period) up to 28 days after last study drug dose in Extension Period (13 Months)); Extension Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Baseline (Day 1 at Entry of Extension Period) up to 28 days after last study drug dose in Extension Period (13 Months)); Initial Period: The Long Term Safety and Tolerability of CP-690,550 5 Milligrams (mg) Twice Daily (BID) and 10 mg BID for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis (Includes AEs for every visit and up to 999 days after last dose of study drug); Extension Period: Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events and Who Discontinued Treatment Due to Adverse Events to Assess Long-term Safety and Tolerability of Tofacitinib (Baseline (Day 1 at Entry of Extension Period) up to Month 6 of Extension Period; Month 6 of Extension Period to Month 12 of Extension Period)

Answer: D
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: A Phase 2, Multi-center, Open-label Study to Determine Long-term Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Split-dose Oral Regimens of Tolvaptan Tablets in a Range of 30 to 120 mg/d in Patients With Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease
Brief Summary: This study's purpose is to evaluate the long-term safety of open-label tolvaptan regimens to determine the maximally-tolerated dose and acquire pilot efficacy data in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD).


Options:
A: Change in kidney function from baseline to month 24 (Baseline, 24 months)
B: Safety Assessments Based on Vital Signs, Electrocardiogram (ECG's), Clinical Laboratory Tests, Physical Examinations Are Reported as Adverse Events (AEs) Upon Study Physician Discretion. (AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-Day follow-up)
C: renal volume measured by high resolution magnetic resolution imaging (1.5 yrs)
D: Change over baseline of the total kidney volume at 1 and 3 years follow-up (estimated by gadolinium contrast enhanced and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, MRI). (Basal, 1 and 3 years follow-up)

Answer: B
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: An Open Label Study of the Effect of Intravenous Mircera on Hemoglobin Levels in Anemic Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease Who Are on Dialysis, and Who Have Previously Received Epoetin Alfa or Beta or Darbepoetin Alfa Treatment.
Brief Summary: This single arm study will assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous Mircera, administered with pre-filled syringes, for the treatment of anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease who are on dialysis, and who have previously received treatment with epoetin alfa or beta or darbepoetin alfa. Patients will receive monthly intravenous injections of Mircera, with the starting dose derived from the dose of epoetin alfa or beta or darbepoetin they were receiving in the week preceding study start. The anticipated time on study treatment is 3-12 months, and the target sample size is 500+ individuals.


Options:
A: Percentage of Participants With Hb Levels Within 11.0-12.5 Grams Per Deciliter (g/dL) During Evaluation Phase (Visits 8 to 10 (Months 6 to 8)); Percentage of Participants With Hb Levels Within 10.0-13.0 g/dL During Evaluation Phase (Visits 8 to 10 (Months 6 to 8)); Percentage of Participants With Hb Levels Within 11.0-12.5 g/dL by Dose Modifications During Evaluation Phase (Visits 8 to 10 (Months 6 to 8)); Percentage of Participants With Hemoglobin Levels Within 10.0-13.0 g/dL by Dose Modification During Evaluation Phase (Visits 8 to 10 (Months 6 to 8))
B: Percentage of Participants Maintaining Their Mean Hb Concentration Within ±1.0 Gram/Deciliter of Their Reference Hb and Between 10.5 and 12.5 Gram/Deciliter (EEP (Week 16 to 24))
C: Percentage of Participants Maintaining Mean Hemoglobin Concentration Within +/- 1 g/dL of Their Reference Hb and Between 10.5 and 12.5 g/dL During Efficacy Evaluation Period (EEP (Week 17 to Week 24))
D: Percentage of Participants Who Maintained Their Mean Hemoglobin Concentration Within +/- 1.0 Gram/Deciliter of Their Reference Hemoglobin Concentration and Between 10.0 and 12.0 Gram/Deciliter During the Efficacy Evaluation Period (EEP (Week 16 to Week 24))

Answer: A
Please select the outcome measures that correspond to the clinical trial below.
Title: Neuroprotective Effect of High Dose Erythropoietin in Very Preterm Infants
Brief Summary: The main goal of this trial is to investigate whether early administration of human erythropoietin (EPO) in very preterm infants improves neurodevelopmental outcome at 24 months corrected age.

This study is designed as randomized, double-masked, placebo controlled multicenter study involving at least 420 patients.


Options:
A: Number of Transfusions During Hospitalization (From birth to 36 weeks gestational age); Composite Cognitive Score at 18-22 Months Corrected Age (18-22 months)
B: Full Scale IQ, Performance IQ, Verbal IQ, Executive Function (42-48 months and 66-72 months)
C: The times taken to establish quarter, half, three quarters, and full enteral feeding after the drug treatment (at least 150ml/kg/day). (one month); Time to stop parentral nutrition (one month); Day of onset of weight gain (one month); Duration of hospitalization (2 months)
D: Mental developmental index (Bayley II) and motor, visual and hearing impairment (at age of 24 months corrected for prematurity.)

Answer: D