prompt_front: Now, answer the following question based on the text below, only give me the answer and do not output any other words.

Question: Where can users go for troubleshooting and support?

Read the following text and answer briefly.

Context 1: 'Quectel_QuecPython_BC25 开发板使用说明 版本：Quectel_QuecPython_BC25 开发板使用说明_V1 1日期：2021-11-30 状态：临时文件
Quectel_QuecPython_BC25 开发板使用说明一、基本概述BC25_QuecPython_EVB_V1 1 开发板（本文简称“V1 1 开发板”）是专门针对 BC25 制造，是一款小巧便携的“口袋型”开发板。体型虽小，但是功能丰富，拥 有 SIM 卡座、板载天线、磁开关、LED 等元件。开发者仅需一条 USB Type-C 数据线即可轻松玩转开发板。二、开发板资源Quectel 移远 BC25 通信模组NANO SIM 自弹卡座USB Type-C 数据接口开机按键，唤醒按键磁开关单色灯GPIO 排针上海市闵行区田林路 1016 号科技绿洲 3 期（B 区）5 号楼 200233 邮箱: info@quectel com 网址: www quectel com 1 / 6
三、开发板介绍Quectel_QuecPython_BC25 开发板使用说明开发板是为方便开发者使用 QuecPython，而设计的一款基于 BC25 通信模块 的开发板，其上集成了开发常用的配置，可以满足开发者的开发需求。V1 1 开发板正面接口V1 1 开发板配置开发板配备了多种外设。明细如下：序 号名称型号是否支持接口类 型1磁开关KTH1601SL-ST3是GPIO2LED 灯S3528UG6W9TLC2G- 是GPIOTJ- 34微动按键GPIOA5--------是是---------上海市闵行区田林路 1016 号科技绿洲 3 期（B 区）5 号楼 200233 邮箱: info@quectel com 网址: www quectel com 2 / 6
Quectel_QuecPython_BC25 开发板使用说明四、功能详解4 1 磁开关开发板集成了一个磁开关。使用磁铁靠近，可使磁开关输出引脚变为低电平， 默认为高电平。4 2 LED 灯开发板集成了一颗高亮度灯珠，可以用来做显著指示灯。上海市闵行区田林路 1016 号科技绿洲 3 期（B 区）5 号楼 200233 邮箱: info@quectel com 网址: www quectel com 3 / 6
4 3 按键开发板集成了 2 个微动按键，其功能是 S1 为开机键，S2 为睡眠唤醒按键。Quectel_QuecPython_BC25 开发板使用说明五、调试步骤1 拿到开发板 V1 1 先插上 USB 安装串口驱动，在官方 QQ 群文件搜 CP210 或者自 行百度下载 CP210x 的串口芯片驱动进行安装。2 使用串口工具（例如 QCOM_V1 6）连接 BC25 的主串口（硬件 17、18 脚）。V1 1 选择 Enhanced COM 口，波特率选择 9600,打开串口，按下 PWK 键约一秒松开进 行开机，串口工具收到消息则代表开机成 功，然后按下 EINT 键串口显示 +QATWAKEUP 表示模组唤醒了。3 从 https://python quectel com/download 下载 BC25QuecPython 版本固件， 使用 Qflash（群文件下载）选择 BC25 的调试串口（硬件 38、39 脚），波特率选 择 921600，选择 lod 后缀的固件，按下 EINT 键串口工具显示模组已经唤醒串口 工具发 AT+QSCLK=0 可关闭睡眠（不会发 AT 则多按几次 EINT 键），点击 Start 开 始下载固件,下载进度条开始下载，等待下载完成。关闭以上所有工具，并给板 子断电重新上电。4 从 https://python quectel com/download 下载 QPYCOM 工具，直接解压运行 工具，选择主串口（同第 2 步），选择 57600 波特率，打开串口。再按 PWK 按键 进行开机，会看到 QPYCOM 有打印 mount Type "help()" for more information 然后就可以进行 QuecPython 的交互调 试了。上海市闵行区田林路 1016 号科技绿洲 3 期（B 区）5 号楼 200233 邮箱: info@quectel com 网址: www quectel com 4 / 6
六、常见问题解决Quectel_QuecPython_BC25 开发板使用说明Q：模块的固件在哪？A：请登录 QuecPython 网站下载：http://python quectel com/downloadQ：哪里有开发板和其他常用资料？A：请登录 QuecPython 网站下载：http://python quectel com/downloadP S  如果您遇到任何问题，请参照本官网在线文档进行解决或访问 QuecPython 社区进行搜索、交流、提问：QuecPython 社区或者联系我们的在线支持：QQ 群 445121768获取 QuecPython 开发固件及加入官方交流群官网主页：https://python quectel com官网文件下载（各类资料、工具）：https://python quectel com/download官网 wiki（常用于视频教程、手把手教程下载、API 库）：https://python quectel com/wiki/#/官网文档中心(拥有从入门到精通的各种文档介绍、必看)：https://python quectel com/doc/工单系统：https://workorder quectel com/QuecPython 社区：https://forumschinese quectel com/c/function-subjects/quectpython/43QuecPython 官方 QQ 开发交流群：445121768微信公众号：QuecPython移远 OTA 升级平台： https://cloudota quectel com/移远 IoT 管理平台：https://python quectel com/doc/doc/Advanced_development/zh/QuecPython Cloud/QuecCloud html上海市闵行区田林路 1016 号科技绿洲 3 期（B 区）5 号楼 200233 邮箱: info@quectel com 网址: www quectel com 5 / 6
附录 1 V1 1 开发板丝印图Quectel_QuecPython_BC25 开发板使用说明附录 2 V1 1 开发板原理图上海市闵行区田林路 1016 号科技绿洲 3 期（B 区）5 号楼 200233 邮箱: info@quectel com 网址: www quectel com 6 / 6
PIU101 PIU102 PIU103 PIU104 PIU105 PIU106 PIU107 PIU108 COR9 PIR902 PIR901 PIU109 PIU1010 PIU1011 PIU1012 PIU1013 PIU1044 PIU1043 PIU1042 PIU1041 PIU1040 PIU1039 PIU1038 PIU1037 PIU1036 COU1A PIU1014 PIU1015 PIU1016 PIU1017 PIU1018 PIU1019 PIU1020 PIU1021 PIU1022 PIU1035 PIU1034 PIU1033 PIU1032 PIU1031 PIU1030 PIU1029 PIU1028 PIU1027 PIU1026 PIU1025 PIU1024 PIU1023 COJ1 PIJ101 COC1 PIC101 PIC102 COC2 PIC201 PIC202 PIC602 COC6 PIC601 COR22 PIR2201 PIR2301 COR23 COR24 PIR2401 PIR2501 COR25 COR14 PIR1401 PIR1601 COR16 PIR2202 PIR2302 PIR2402 PIR2502 PIR1402 PIR1602 COC14 PIC1402 PIC1401 COR33 PIR3301 PIR3302 COU2 PIU201 PIU202 PIU203 PIR3002 COR30 COD6 PIR3001 PID601 PID602 COR31 PIR3102 PIR3101 PIQ201 PIQ203 COQ2 COR32 PIQ202 PIR3201 PIR3202 COR1 COD1 PIR102 PIR101 PID101 PID102 PIQ103 COQ1 PIQ102 COR13 PIR1302 PIR1301 PIQ101 PIR1501 COR15 PIR1502 PIR302 COR3 PIR301 PIR402 COR4 PIR401 PIU1045 PIU1046 PIU1047 PIU1048 PIU1049 PIU1050 PIU1051 PIU1052 PIU1053 COR19 PIR1902 PIR1901 COR20 PIR2002 PIR2001 PIU1072 PIU1071 PIU1070 PIU1069 PIU1068 COU1B PIU1054 PIU1055 PIU1056 PIU1057 PIU1058 PIU1067 PIU1066 PIU1065 PIU1064 PIU1063 PIU1062 PIU1061 PIU1060 PIU1059 PIU1073 PIU1074 PIU1075 PIU1076 PIU1077 PIU1078 PIU1079 PIU1080 COU1C PIU1088 PIU1087 PIU1086 PIU1085 PIU1084 PIU1083 PIU1082 PIU1081 PIU1089 PIU1090 PIU1091 COU1D PIU1094 PIU1093 PIU1092 COM2 COM1 1122334455667788DDCCBBAATitleNumberRevisionSizeA3Date:2021/11/1Sheet ofFile:E:\\\\  \\1 BC25 SchDocDrawn By:1J1ADCR44 7KR34 7KADC_INGNDQUECTEL_LOGOQuecPythonGNDC1100uF 6 3VGNDAUX_TXD_1V8AUX_RXD_1V8GNDUSIM1_VDDRESETNETLIGHTM_RXD_1V8M_TXD_1V8PIN19PIN20VDD_EXTPIN23PIN22PIN21R234 7KR224 7KVDD_EXTR254 7KR244 7KPIN20PIN21PIN23PIN22PIN25PIN30PIN31PIN32PIN33GNDR14 7K312Q1D1蓝 LEDNETR130RR15NCNETLIGHTC61uFGNDGND1RESERVED2MIC_P3MIC_N4SPK_P5SPK_N6PWRKEY7RESERVED8RESERVED9GND10USIM_DATA11USIM_RST12USIM_CLK13USIM_VDD14RESET_N15NET_STATUS16MAIN_RXD17MAIN_TXD18MAIN_DTR19MAIN_RI20MAIN_DCD21MAIN_CTS22MAIN_RTS23VDD_EXT24STATUS25RESERVED26GND27AUX_RXD28AUX_TXD29PCM_CLK30PCM_SYNC31PCM_DIN32PCM_DOUT33GND34ANT_MAIN35GND36GND37DBG_RXD38DBG_TXD39GND40GND41VBAT42VBAT43RESERVED44U1ABC25/EC800NGND45GND46GND47GND48RESERVED49RESERVED50RESERVED51RESERVED52RESERVED53RESERVED54RESERVED55RESERVED56RESERVED57RESERVED58USB_DP59USB_DM60USB_VBUS61RESERVED62RESERVED63RESERVED64RESERVED65I2C_SDA66I2C_SCL67RESERVED68RESERVED69GND70GND71GND72U1BEC800NGND73RESERVED74RESERVED75RESERVED76RESERVED77RESERVED78USIM_DET79RESERVED80RESERVED81USB_BOOT82RESERVED83RESERVED84RESERVED85RESERVED86RESERVED87GND88U1CEC800NGND89GND90GND91GND92GND93GND94U1DEC800NGNDGNDUSIM_DETUSB_BOOTGNDVBUSDM_EC800NDP_EC800NGNDGNDPIN3POWRKEYUSIM1_CLKUSIM1_RSTUSIM1_DATAGNDGNDD_RXD_1V8D_TXD_1V8C2100uF 6 3V+3 8VR90RADCI2C_SCL_EC800NI2C_SDA_EC800NR164 7KR144 7KI2C_SDA_EC800NI2C_SCL_EC800N+3 8VPIN4PIN5PIN6R190RR200RDM_EC800NDP_EC800NUSB_DMUSB_DP+3 8VGNDR304 7K312Q2D6翠绿灯珠NETR310RR32NCPIN30+3 8VGND3OUTPUT2VCC1U2KTH1601SL-ST3VCC_1V8C141uFGNDGNDR3310KVCC_1V8PIN31磁性开关灯珠EC800N焊接R19、R20电源部分请参考官方设计BC25不焊接
COC9 PIC902 PIC901 COU3 PIU301 PIU302 PIU303 PIU306 PIU305 PIU304 COR7 PIR702 PIR701 COL1 PIL101 PIL102 PIC701 PIC702 COC7 COD2 PID202 PID201 COC10 PIC1001 PIC1002 PIC1201 PIC1202 COC12 COR8 PIR802 PIR801 PID501 PID502 COD5 COU6 PIU601 PIU602 PIU603 PIU605 PIU604 PIC1102 COC11 PIC1101 PIC802 COC8 PIC801 COR21 PIR2101 PIR2102 COUSBC1 PIUSBC100 PIUSBC10A12 PIUSBC10A9 PIUSBC10A8 PIUSBC10A7 PIUSBC10A6 PIUSBC10A5 PIUSBC10A4 PIUSBC10A1 PIUSBC10B1 PIUSBC10B4 PIUSBC10B5 PIUSBC10B6 PIUSBC10B7 PIUSBC10B8 PIUSBC10B9 PIUSBC10B12 COR10 PIR1002 PIR1001 COR11 PIC1301 PIC1302 COC13 PIR1101 PIR1102 COD4 PID401 PID402 COD3 PID301 PID302 COD7 PID701 PID702 11223344DDCCBBAATitleNumberRevisionSizeA4Date:2021/11/1Sheet ofFile:E:\\\\  \\2 POWER SchDocDrawn By:type-CDCDCGNDGNDB1VBUSB4CC2B5DP2B6DN2B7SBU2B8VBUSB9GNDB1200000000GNDA1VBUSA4CC1A5DP1A6DN1A7SBU1A8VBUSA9GNDA12USBC1USB3 1C16PFSMTGNDGNDUSB_DMUSB_DMUSB_DPUSB_DPVBUSVBUSVBUSVBUSD3ESD9L5 0ST5GD4ESD9L5 0ST5GD2SMBJ6 5CAGND1SW2VIN3VFB4EN5VBST6U3TPS563201DDCRGND2 2uHL1WPN4020H2R2MTC90 1uFR710KC120 1uFGNDGND+5V+3 8V+5VR1110KR1040 2KC130 1uFGND+3 8VD54 7KR8GND+3 8VC722uF 10VC1022uF 10VVCC_1V8C84 7uFR2110KVIN1GND2EN3NC4VOUT5U6ME6212C18M5GGNDGNDC114 7uFGND+5VD7SS34VBUS+5V
COC3 PIC301 PIC302 COCARD1 PICARD10C1 PICARD10C2 PICARD10C3 PICARD108 PICARD109 PICARD1010 PICARD1011 PICARD10C5 PICARD10C6 PICARD10C7 PICARD10CD PIR1202 COR12 PIR1201 PIU501 PIU503 PIU504 PIU505 PIU506 COU5 PIU502 11223344DDCCBBAATitleNumberRevisionSizeA4Date:2021/11/1Sheet ofFile:E:\\\\  \\4 SIM-CARD SchDocDrawn By:123456U5USIM1_VDDUSIM1_RSTUSIM1_CLKUSIM1_DATAGND10KR12USIMGNDVCCC1RSTC2CLKC3I/OC7VPPC6GNDC5CDCDEP8EP9EP10EP11CARD1SMN-303GNDC30 1uFUSIM_DET
COJ5 PIJ501 PIJ502 PIJ503 PIJ504 PIJ505 PIJ506 PIJ507 PIJ508 PIJ509 PIJ5010 PIJ5011 PIJ5012 PIJ5013 PIJ5014 PIJ5015 COJ6 PIJ601 PIJ602 PIJ603 PIJ604 PIJ605 PIJ606 PIJ607 PIJ608 PIJ609 PIJ6010 PIJ6011 PIJ6012 PIJ6013 PIJ6014 PIJ6015 COU4 PIU409 PIR501 PIR502 COR5 COS1 PIS101 PIS102 COR17 COS2 PIR1702 PIR1701 PIS201 PIS202 COR18 PIR1802 PIR1801 COR2 PIR201 PIR202 PIC402 COC4 PIC401 PIC502 COC5 PIC501 PIR602 COR6 PIU405 PIR601 PIU406 PIC1702 PIC1701 COC17 PIU407 PIU402 PIU408 PIU403 PIU404 PIU401 PIU4024 PIU4023 PIU4022 PIU4021 PIU4020 PIU4019 PIU4018 PIU4017 PIU4016 PIU4015 PIU4014 PIU4013 PIU4012 PIU4011 PIU4010 PIU400 COR26 COR27 PIR2602 PIR2702 PIR2601 PIR2701 COR28 COR29 PIR2802 PIR2902 PIR2801 PIR2901 11223344DDCCBBAATitleNumberRevisionSizeA4Date:2021/11/1Sheet ofFile:E:\\\\  \\6 GPIO+UART SchDocDrawn By:GPIOAUX_RXD_1V8AUX_TXD_1V8GNDD_TXD_1V8D_RXD_1V8S1S2GNDVDD_EXTPOWRKEYPIN19VBUSRI_SCI1GND2D+3D-4VIO5VDD6REGIN7VBUS8-RST9CTS_ECI10RTS_ECI11RXD_ECI12TXD_ECI13GPIO 1_ECI14GPIO 0_ECI15NC16RI_ECI17CTS_SCI18RTS_SCI19RXD_SCI20TXD_SCI21GPIO 2_SCI22GPIO 1_SCI23GPIO 0_SCI24GND0U4CP2105GND1uFC17R5NC1uFC4C50 1uFGNDGNDR6NCR20RADC_INM_TXD_1V8M_RXD_1V8PIN19PIN25PIN33PIN30PIN31PIN32USB_DMUSB_DPM_RXD_1V8M_TXD_1V8R260RR270RR280RR290RD_RXD_1V8D_TXD_1V8PIN3PIN4PIN5PIN6PIN20PIN21PIN22PIN23123456789101112131415J5Header 15123456789101112131415J6Header 15R170RR180RUSB_BOOTI2C_SCL_EC800NI2C_SDA_EC800N+3 8VRESETGNDVCC_1V8VCC_1V8+5VEC800N不焊接CP2105
'



ground_truth: Online documentation, QuecPython community, online support: QQ group 445121768.

prompt_front: Now, answer the following question based on the text below, only give me the answer and do not output any other words.

Question: What were the vaccines trialed against?

Read the following text and answer briefly.

Context 2: A special tribute to Del Bigtree (pictured) and his team at ICAN for his stunning 88 page letter to the HHS regarding vaccine safety  As Del reported - in the latest edition of Highwire - the letter, in response to an earlier reply from the then acting Director National Vaccine Program Office, Melinda Wharton, took virtually a year to compile, and is a meticulous piece of research  Most sensationally they researched the HHS claim through US government archives that at least some pediatric vaccines had been trialed against genuine placebo, and came to a negative conclusion  Not only that, they established that none of the vaccines those vaccines had been trialed against had ever been trialed against genuine placebo either  At the end of the line the toxic products were only being compared with other toxic products, rather than against saline 
Leave aside the sceptics, for any believer in the vaccine program as a necessary intervention in public health, this should be a devastating finding  Fundamentally, the research into the safety of any of the products before marketing was simply not there  The manufacturers apparently had no faith that their proto-products could withstand this scrutiny, and for the rest they just did not care: under the alleged imperative of protecting the population it seems anything went  So even before all the sham monitoring procedures and reviews which Del and his team dismantle in forensic detail we are left with the proposition that none of the present products being given to US children – and frequently other children across most of the developed world – have any meaningful pre-marketing safety data all  If you are believer in the program you have been let down: if you wanted a program with any pretensions to safety - supposing such a thing to be possible - it looks like you would have to start from scratch  The manufacturers did this: the governments, the politicians and the regulators (internationally) let it happen 
This damning document is published simultaneously with a demand in the UK from the Royal Society for Public Health (which I had never heard of) to shut down comment about vaccines on the web  It echoes calls from Seth Berkley of GAVI, Heidi Larson of the Vaccine Confidence Project and the European Parliament  The pamphlet airily dismisses concerns that vaccines have side effects or that you could possibly have too many  It is pure public relations, and if the RSPH claims to be "independent" it also admits that the publication was paid for by Merck, a detail which was reported by British Medical Journal and the Guardian, but not true to form by the BBC  We have, in truth, been building to this moment for two decades: as the evidence piles up that every single aspect of the program lacks integrity or is simply rotten to the core all the perpetrators can do is call for the silencing of their critics, and maintain the products are safe because they say so 
Please help give the ICAN letter the widest possible distribution, particularly to politicians 
"The outcome of disease always depends both on the virulence of the pathogen and the health of the individual immune system "
Nope  This makes no sense  Lots of people who seemed vibrant will get a very severe case of the same illness that a vulnerable baby overcomes in a day 
And under the germ theory it doesn't matter how strong your immune system *was*  Once it's been overcome by the pathogen it is every bit as weak as anybody else's with that pathogen 
What you say makes no sense  There's no reason for me to reply to you again 
"Why do you think that within a few years (not many) of the introduction of the vaccines for them, pertussis, measles, mumps, rubella, tetanus, diphtheria, Hib disease, and chickenpox (and others) almost entirely disappeared?"
Why do you keep asking this question when I've already provided the answer hundreds of times? Why are you so desperate to believe the people who you already recognize are harming our children?
Why would Walter Reed be any more trustworthy than Paul Offit or Senator Pan? Why would Jenner or Pasteur?
And you went no way to explaining my arguments against germ theory  If we are attacked by billions of viruses every day then if even a tiny fraction of them are pathogenic then we couldn't possibly survive  And even if we could, we would already be immune rendering every vaccine pointless  Once we had survived our first few days on earth, then we could never get sick again 
If that's wrong then we must conclude that precisely 0% of germs are pathogenic 
Plus your comment about the immune system completely misunderstood my point  The immune system does not allow us to overcome our math problem  In fact, it makes it worse 
You did provide one solitary example of a patient with what are presumably yellow fever symptoms but you didn't say whether they had been given any toxic medical treatments 
And like I said before, the whole "incubation period" is more than a little suspicious  Clearly they never found what they thought they would and just rigged the results to tell them what they want to hear 
Like every other germ theorist/vaccine promoter in history 
Many kinds of bacteria are constantly evolving and changing, like flu viruses  Others are more stable over time, like the yellow fever virus  Those that change develop new ways of infiltrating the cells of the organism being attacked (from our point of view, from its unconscious point of view, it's just carrying out its need to replicate, which it can only do inside the cells of its host)  The changes which allow it to better infiltrate are more successful and result in more viruses with those traits 
Our immune system is designed to detect and destroy potentially dangerous invading pathogens  Many bacteria are usually harmless and absolutely necessary  The minority are dangerous, and most people's immune systems do a good job of analyzing them and killing them, often with no signs of disease  Others experience a clinical infection, and the immune system usually mounts a successful attack on them 
The outcome of disease always depends both on the virulence of the pathogen and the health of the individual immune system  Vaccines are usually effective in giving immunity to the targeted diseases  They also have many dangers which everyone should be aware of, and vaccines should be avoided whenever possible  But in the case of the most dangerous diseases, everyone should learn about them and think about what he wants to do to protect himself and his children from them, considering all the factors involved  And no one can have 100% certainty that he has made the right decision, but that's life  But if you live in the Congo and many people around you are currently dying of yellow fever, then that means that you yourself are at risk of being bitten by a loaded mosquito and getting, often dying, of yellow fever  The yellow fever vaccine is very effective at preventing yellow fever  From there, each person must make a choice 
At the end of this stage there is a remission of two or three days  About 80% of those with clinical disease recover at this point, with permanent immunity  The other 20% enter the toxic stage, with a return of the fever, black vomit (coffee-ground emesis), diarrhea, a slowing of the pulse (Faget's sign), jaundice, yellow eyes, yellow skin, and failure of the kidneys, liver, and heart  The patient gets a strange hiccup (like with Ebola, a related disease), falls into a coma, and dies  About half of those patients who enter the toxic stage dies, even now, even with the best of hospital care  The Faget's sign can also occur at the end of the first stage 
You asked specifically about the symptoms of the Americans on Dr  Reed's team who got yellow fever in Cuba in 1900  I'll give the passage from The American Plague (162-5), which describes the course of Jesse Lazear's illness  "In his logbook, Lazear wrote an unusual entry on September 13  In all cases before those, page after page of records, Lazear had used the soldier's name and simply the date he was bitten, with no other attention to the mosquito  A one-line entry with a name and a date  On that day, however, in his elegant hand, Lazear did not write the soldier's name, but instead wrote 'Guinea Pig No  1 ' He went on to write that this guinea pig had been bitten by a mosquito that developed from an egg laid by a mosquito that developed from an egg laid by a mosquito that fed on a number of yellow fever cases: Suarez, Hernández, De Long, Ferández  It was a precise, detailed history that proved beyond doubt that the mosquito was loaded with the virus when it bit a healthy soldier   (If he had entered his name, then his death would have been considered medical suicide by the insurance company, and his wife and two children would not have gotten any payment ) For the next few days, Lazear's life continued much as it had over the last few months in Cuba  He fed and cared for the mosquitoes in the lab    Then he began to lose his appetite  He skipped a few meals in the mess hall  He didn't mention it to anyone, nor did he ask to see one of the yellow fever doctors; instead, he worked hard in the lab trying to ignore the oncoming headache 
"On September 18, he complained of feeling 'out of sorts,' and stayed in his officer's quarters  His head pounded and L  decided to write a letter    (he wrote to his mother, and referred to his one-year old son Houston and the baby his wife Mabel was about to have: they were staying with his mother in the US)    That night, L  started to feel chilled as the fever came on  He never went to sleep but worked at his desk all through the night, trying to get all the information about the mosquitoes organized  By morning, he showed all the signs of a severe attack of yellow fever  The camp doctors made the diagnosis, and L  agreed to go to the yellow fever ward    L  was carried by litter out of the two-room, white pine board house in which he had lived since he and Mabel first arrived in Cuba    (In the yellow fever ward, in a separate one-room building), Lena Warner (the immune nurse who had survived the yellow fever in 1878, when she was nine, and was found in her boarded-up house by a former slave who first thought she was dead, and carried her to safety) nursed J L , recording his vitals  (I put up a link to his case record and vital signs last week  The surgeon general required that this record be made for every yellow fever patient )    (On September 25,) Lena Warner braced L's arms with all of her weight, shouting for help  Still he bolted from the bed, darting around the small frame-wood room as wildly as a trapped insect beating against glass  Two soldiers ran into the ward, pinning L to his bed, tying restraints around his wrists and elbows    Warner sponged his body with iced whiskey and water  She recorded his temperature, which had held at 104 degrees for days, on the chart beside his bed    (Warner watched him sleep ) But the quiet did not last  L's body began to lurch, and black vomit rolled from his mouth; through the bar hanging above his hospital cot  He writhed in the bed, and his skin grew deep yellow  His 104 temperature slowly fell, leveling out 99 degrees, and JL died at 8:45 p m  at the age of thirty-four "
As is obvious, there are many problems with vaccines  But, that being said, most of them usually work for a period of time to prevent the targeted diseases  The basic science behind vaccines is correct  Why do you think that within a few years (not many) of the introduction of the vaccines for them, pertussis, measles, mumps, rubella, tetanus, diphtheria, Hib disease, and chickenpox (and others) almost entirely disappeared? In the case of the routine childhood diseases, this was a bad thing, but it is a true thing 
Vaccines usually don't cause any obvious reactions  While they usually prevent the diseases, and that's why people continue to get them  With the increasing vaccination schedule, more and more are severely and permanently damaged, and it is immoral to mandate any vaccine for anyone for this reason  But it would also be immoral to prohibit vaccines for those who want them enough to take the risk 
Your article said as though it had any probative value that 90% of those who get pertussis had been vaxxed  The old DPT vaccine was MUCH more effective at preventing pertussis, but it was so dangerous (again, not to most, but to many), that developed countries replaced it with the acellular version, DTaP  From the beginning about twenty years ago, it was clear that it was not very effective and that huge numbers of vaxxed people got pertussis anyway, including my daughter who got pertussis at eight month old after having gotten three DTaPs  The pertussis vaccine continues to be very dangerous, and I do not recommend that anyone get it  It used to be a killer disease, but evolved to become much milder, to the extent that the disease is very rarely dangerous (usually only to newborns under three months old), while the vaccine is very dangerous  And they're trying to see how they can go back to the old DPT  This does not show that vaccine science has collapsed, but rather that the vaccine they developed to replace the DPT turned out to be much less effective than they first thought, while continuing to be much more dangerous than they first thought 
Your article extrapolated from that that modern medical science in general has collapsed, but that, again, is going too far  A older woman in Mexico City who is like my mother to me had a pacemaker inserted about two months ago to aid her failing heart, and it has restored her to optimism and energy, when she was despondent, weak, and close to death  I took my daughter to the dentist yesterday, who said she has three wisdom teeth coming in and that she said that the lower right one was sore  So, although I am cautious about X-rays, I made an appointment for a panoramic X-ray in a month to assess the wisdom teeth, and, if it seems appropriate, I'll take her to an oral surgeon to have one or more extracted under IV sedation, in his office, if possible (the dentist thought that it would be)  And I am confident that there will be no serious problems, but this is thanks to technology and training in modern medicine that haven't been available for that long 
I think that everyone should inform himself on all medical procedures before agreeing to anything, but I also think that he should have access to any medical procedure which is reasonable (and opinions can differ as to that) 
One problem is that you have not said how you think people should protect themselves against tetanus, bacterial meningitis, and yellow fever in the relevant cases, for example  These are diseases which healthy, well-nourished people used to die from very readily 
If most people stopped vaxxing and the mortality from these diseases rose to something like pre-vaccine levels, do you think they should just accept dying from them?
I put that in a separate paragraph because it is the crucial issue 
balinaheuchter Air Traffic Control You Tube - Colin Campbell example of - How to "Fudge a Nudge" -"Deal" or "No Deal" "Not in a month of Sundays" "No exceptions/no compromise?" -make a trade off -do an exception- everyone get's a good deal /good outcome!
Hans, you are right that we are looking at one of the biggest crimes in all history  When I read the story of that poor girl who was so healthy and is now confined to a wheelchair after getting her third Gardasil shot I could not believe that Merck could produce such a toxic vaccine and give it out to girls like it was something they absolutely had to have only to be mislead and made into cripples  Merck should be prosecuted for the damage they have done to so many girls who got the Gardasil vaccine and were physically debilitated for life  There is a place for the people who perpetrated this crime on young girls and women and it is called hell  They have destroyed people's lives and gotten away with it  My heart goes out to those who have suffered this damage for no damn good reason except to help make huge profits for Merck!
Here is the reason that the germ theory is nonsense 
1) Everyday we are bombarded with billions of germs  Presumably at least some of them are of the kind that germ theorists believe are dangerous (otherwise we would have to conclude that none of them are dangerous)  So how do we survive?
2) Let's just say that we ignore 1 and imagine that, by way of magic, none of the billions of viruses we get bombarded with are pathogenic but all those that are are tucked away somewhere  Ok  But presumably they reside in sick people right? So where are there lots of sick people? Doctor offices and hospitals! So everybody must be dying the moment they enter these places right?
3) I love this one because I have never seen anybody else ever raise it  Under the germ theory there are no negative feedbacks  This makes a stable biological system by definition impossible  The immune system is *not* a negative feedback it is the opposite  It actually reinforces our math problem because the immune system will weaken as the number of pathogens increase 
There is no way of resolving this problem without a discontinuity  A Deus ex Machina as The Almighty Pill so beautifully put it  So the germ theory is quite literally, mathematically impossible 
There is as much chance of it being true as 2+2 = 5 
There are plenty of other massive problems with germ theory such as why did things like SARS and bird flu magically disappear? Why do we have the symptoms that we do? Is our body controlling the symptoms to help fight the germs and if so, why would suppressing the symptoms with antibiotics or Tamiflu be considered a good idea? If the virus is causing the symptoms then why would it cause these kinds of things?



ground_truth: Other toxic products.

prompt_front: Now, answer the following question based on the text below, only give me the answer and do not output any other words.

Question: What is the dynamical behavior of the anisotropic order parameter following a quench to the critical point?

Read the following text and answer briefly.

Context 3: \section*{Dynamical Behaviour of $O$ in Lattice Gases}

The dynamical behaviour of the anisotropic order parameter  $m$ [see Eq ~\eqref{eq:def-m} in the Letter] following a quench to the critical point is well described by
the Gaussian theory for all the three lattice gas models studied, $i e ,$ driven lattice gas with either constant (IDLG) or random (RDLG) infinite drive and equilibrium lattice gas (LG)  In other words, in the short-time regime, $m \sim t^{1/2}$ [see Eq  \eqref{eq:mt}] and the Binder cumulant $g$ of the lowest transverse mode [defined in Eq  \eqref{eq:binder}] is zero in this regime  The alternative order parameter $O,$ however, distinguishes between the driven (IDLG, RDLG) and the equilibrium (LG) lattice gases  

In order to understand  this, we first write the phenomenological scaling form for $O$,  analogous to Eq  \eqref{eq:scalingass} in  the Letter,
\begin{eqnarray}
O (t, L_{\parallel} ; S_\Delta) = L_{\parallel}^{-\beta/[\nu(1+\Delta)]} \tilde f_O (t/L_{\parallel}^{z/(1+\Delta)} ; S_\Delta) \quad
\label{eq:Oscalingass}
\end{eqnarray}
We already remarked that, in the LG, this scaling form is not compatible with the prediction $O \sim t^{1/8}  L_{\parallel}^{-1/2}$ of the Gaussian theory   However, following Ref  \cite{AS2002}, it can be argued that, at short times, the only dependence of $O$ on the system size $L_{\parallel}$ is of the form $O \sim L_\parallel^{-1/2}$ which is very well confirmed by numerical simulations  Accordingly,  the generic behaviour of $O$ can be assumed to be
\begin{eqnarray}
O \sim t^{\alpha} L_\parallel^{-1/2}, \label{eq:O}
\end{eqnarray}
where $\alpha$ is a phenomenological exponent to be determined  This, along with Eq  \eqref{eq:Oscalingass}, implies $\tilde f_O(x) \sim x^{\alpha} $ Comparing the finite-size behaviour in Eq ~\eqref{eq:O} with Eq ~\eqref{eq:Oscalingass} one actually infers,
\begin{eqnarray}
\alpha &=& \frac{1+ \Delta -2 \beta/\nu}{2 \, (4- \eta)}  \label{eq:alpha}
\end{eqnarray}
This equation, together with the hyperscaling relation $\Delta - 2 \beta/\nu= - \eta$ in two spatial dimensions, shows that the prediction $\alpha = 1/8$ of the Gaussian theory [see Eq  \eqref{eq:Ot}] can be obtained only when $\eta=0,$ which is the case for the IDLG (exactly) and the RDLG (approximately) but not for the LG  

On the other hand,  Eq ~\eqref{eq:alpha} predicts $\alpha = 1/10$ upon substituting the values of the critical exponents corresponding to the Ising  universality class (LG)  This is consistent with the numerical simulation results presented in the main text, see Fig  \ref{fig:ising}(b) therein 

\begin{figure}[th]
\vspace*{0 2 cm}
 \centering
 \includegraphics[width=10 cm]{ /compare_binder pdf}

\caption{Comparison between the temporal evolution of the Binder cumulants $g$ corresponding to the $12^{th}$ transverse mode, $i e ,$ with $n_\perp =12,$ in the LG (lowest curve), IDLG and RDLG (two upper curves) on a $32 \times 32$ lattice  \label{fig:b}}
 \label{fig:binder}
\end{figure}


The emergence of this new value $1/10$ of the exponent $\alpha$ must be traced back to the non-Gaussian nature of higher fluctuating modes in the LG  In fact, even though the lowest mode behaves identically in all the three models we considered,  characterized by the same behaviour of $m$, higher modes show a significant difference in the non-driven case   


To illustrate this, we measured the Binder cumulants of higher modes which is defined  analogously to Eq ~(11), using transverse modes other than the first, i e , with $\mu=\tilde \sigma(0,2 \pi n_\bot/L_\bot)$ and $n_\bot>1 $  
 Figure \ref{fig:b} compares the same for all the three lattice gases for the mode with $n_\perp =12$ on a $32 \times 32$ lattice  Clearly, the curve corresponding to the LG (lowest, blue) departs from Gaussian behaviour $g=0$ (in practice, $e g ,$ $|g| \lesssim 0 005,$ corresponding to the shaded gray area) much earlier than it does for the IDLG  or RDLG (two upper curves, red and green respectively) 

Accordingly, the different dynamical behaviour of $O$, which involves a sum over all modes, can be attributed to the non-Gaussian nature of the higher modes in the LG  
Such a departure is not entirely surprising  In fact, for higher modes, mesoscopic descriptions such as the ones in Eqs  \eqref{eq:L-DLG} or \eqref{eq:g_evol} are not expected to hold, while the anisotropy at the microscopic level could be the mechanism leading to the Gaussianity of higher modes in the driven models 





ground_truth: It is well described by the Gaussian theory.