prompt_front: Now, answer the following question based on the text below, only give me the answer and do not output any other words.

Question: What is the significance of the interlayer Berry connection polarizability?

Read the following text and answer briefly.

Context 1: Paper Info

Title: Crossed Nonlinear Dynamical Hall Effect in Twisted Bilayers
Publish Date: 17 Mar 2023
Author List: 

Figure

FIG  1 (a) Schematics of experimental setup (b, c) Valence band structure and intrinsic Hall conductivity with respect to in-plane input for tMoTe2 at twist angles (b) θ = 1 2 • and (c) θ = 2 • in +K valley Color coding in (b) and (c) denotes the layer composition σ z n (k) 
FIG  2  (a) The interlayer BCP G, and (b) its vorticity [∂ k × G]z on the first valence band from +K valley of 1 2 • tMoTe2 Background color and arrows in (a) denote the magnitude and vector flow, respectively Grey curves in (b) show energy contours at 1/2 and 3/4 of the band width The black dashed arrow denotes direction of increasing hole doping level Black dashed hexagons in (a, b) denote the boundary of moiré Brillouin zone (mBZ) 
FIG  3  (a-c) Three high-symmetry stacking registries for tBG with a commensurate twist angle θ = 21 8 •  Lattice geometries with rotation center on an overlapping atomic site (a, b) and hexagonal center (c) (d) Schematic of the moiré pattern when the twist angle slightly deviates from 21 8 • , here θ = 21 •  Red squares marked by A, B and C are the local regions that resemble commensurate 21 8 • patterns in (a), (b) and (c), respectively (e, f) Low-energy band structures and intrinsic Hall conductivity of the two geometries [(a) and (b) are equivalent] The shaded areas highlight energy windows ∼ ω around band degeneracies where interband transitions, not considered here, may quantitatively affect the conductivity measured 
FIG  S4 Band structure and layer composition σ z n in +K valley of tBG (left panel) and the intrinsic Hall conductivity (right panel) at three different twist angle θ The shaded areas highlight energy windows ∼ ω around band degeneracies in which the conductivity results should not be considered Here σH should be multiplied by a factor of 2 accounting for spin degeneracy 

abstract

We propose an unconventional nonlinear dynamical Hall effect characteristic of twisted bilayers  The joint action of in-plane and out-of-plane ac electric fields generates Hall currents j ∼ Ė⊥ × E in both sum and difference frequencies, and when the two orthogonal fields have common frequency their phase difference controls the on/off, direction and magnitude of the rectified dc Hall current 
This novel intrinsic Hall response has a band geometric origin in the momentum space curl of interlayer Berry connection polarizability, arising from layer hybridization of electrons by the twisted interlayer coupling  The effect allows a unique rectification functionality and a transport probe of chiral symmetry in bilayer systems 
We show sizable effects in twisted homobilayer transition metal dichalcogenides and twisted bilayer graphene over broad range of twist angles  Nonlinear Hall-type response to an in-plane electric field in a two dimensional (2D) system with time reversal symmetry has attracted marked interests   Intensive studies have been devoted to uncovering new types of nonlinear Hall transport induced by quantum geometry and their applications such as terahertz rectification and magnetic information readout  
Restricted by symmetry , the known mechanisms of nonlinear Hall response in quasi-2D nonmagnetic materials are all of extrinsic nature, sensitive to fine details of disorders , which have limited their utilization for practical applications  Moreover, having a single driving field only, the effect has not unleashed the full potential of nonlinearity for enabling controlled gate in logic operation, where separable inputs (i e , in orthogonal directions) are desirable 
The latter, in the context of Hall effect, calls for control by both out-of-plane and in-plane electric fields  A strategy to introduce quantum geometric response to out-of-plane field in quasi-2D geometry is made possible in van der Waals (vdW) layered structures with twisted stacking   Taking homobilayer as an example, electrons have an active layer degree of freedom that is associated with an out-of-plane electric dipole , whereas interlayer quantum tunneling rotates this pseudospin about in-plane axes that are of topologically nontrivial textures in the twisted landscapes  
Such layer pseudospin structures can underlie novel quantum geometric properties when coupled with out-ofplane field  Recent studies have found layer circular photogalvanic effect and layer-contrasted time-reversaleven Hall effect , arising from band geometric quantities  In this work we unveil a new type of nonlinear Hall effect in time-reversal symmetric twisted bilayers, where an intrinsic Hall current emerges under the combined action of an in-plane electric field E and an out-of-plane ac field E ⊥ (t): j ∼ Ė⊥ × E [see Fig  ] 
Having the two driving fields (inputs) and the current response (output) all orthogonal to each other, the effect is dubbed as the crossed nonlinear dynamical Hall effect  This is also the first nonlinear Hall contribution of an intrinsic nature in nonmagnetic materials without external magnetic field, determined solely by the band structures, not relying on extrinsic factors such as disorders and relaxation times 
The effect arises from the interlayer hybridization of electronic states under the chiral crystal symmetry characteristic of twisted bilayers, and has a novel band geometric origin in the momentum space curl of interlayer Berry connection polarizability (BCP)  Having two driving fields of the same frequency, a dc Hall current develops, whose on/off, direction and magnitude can all be controlled by the phase difference of the two fields, which does not affect the magnitude of the double-frequency component 
Such a characteristic tunability renders this effect a unique approach to rectification and transport probe of chiral bilayers  As examples, we show sizable effects in small angle twisted transition metal dichalcogenides (tTMDs) and twisted bilayer graphene (tBG), as well as tBG of large angles where Umklapp interlayer tunneling dominates 
Geometric origin of the effect  A bilayer system couples to in-plane and out-of-plane driving electric fields in completely different ways  The in-plane field couples to the 2D crystal momentum, leading to Berry-phase effects in the 2D momentum space   In comparison, the outof-plane field is coupled to the interlayer dipole moment p in the form of −E ⊥ p, where p = ed 0 σz with σz as the Pauli matrix in the layer index subspace and d 0 the interlayer distance 
When the system has a more than twofold rotational axis in the z direction, as in tBG and tTMDs, any in-plane current driven by the out-of-plane field alone is forbidden  It also prohibits the off-diagonal components of the symmetric part of the conductivity tensor σ ab = ∂j a /∂E ||,b with respect to the in-plane input and output 
Since the antisymmetric part of σ ab is not allowed by the Onsager reciprocity in nonmagnetic systems, all the off-diagonal components of σ ab is forbidden, irrespective of the order of out-of-plane field  On the other hand, as we will show, an in-plane Hall conductivity σ xy = −σ yx can still be driven by the product of an in-plane field and the time variation rate of an outof-plane ac field, which is a characteristic effect of chiral bilayers 
To account for the effect, we make use of the semiclassical theory   The velocity of an electron in a bilayer system is given by where k is the 2D crystal momentum  Here and hereafter we suppress the band index for simplicity, unless otherwise noted  The three contributions in this equation come from the band velocity, the anomalous velocities induced by the k -space Berry curvature Ω k and by the hybrid Berry curvature Ω kE ⊥ in the (k, E ⊥ ) space 
For the velocity at the order of interest, the k-space Berry curvature is corrected to the first order of the variation rate of out-of-plane field Ė⊥ as Here A = u k |i∂ k |u k is the unperturbed k-space Berry connection, with |u k being the cell-periodic part of the Bloch wave, whereas is its gauge invariant correction , which can be identified physically as an in-plane positional shift of an electron induced by the time evolution of the out-of-plane field 
For a band with index n, we have whose numerator involves the interband matrix elements of the interlayer dipole and velocity operators, and ε n is the unperturbed band energy  Meanwhile, up to the first order of in-plane field, the hybrid Berry curvature reads Here A E || is the k-space Berry connection induced by E || field , which represents an intralayer positional shift and whose detailed expression is not needed for our purpose 
and is its first order correction induced by the in-plane field  In addition, ε = ε + δε, where δε = eE • G Ė⊥ is the field-induced electron energy   Given that A E || is the E ⊥ -space counterpart of intralayer shift A E || , and that E ⊥ is conjugate to the interlayer dipole moment, we can pictorially interpret A E || as the interlayer shift induced by in-plane field 
It indeed has the desired property of flipping sign under the horizontal mirror-plane reflection, hence is analogous to the so-called interlayer coordinate shift introduced in the study of layer circular photogalvanic effect , which is nothing but the E ⊥ -space counterpart of the shift vector well known in the nonlinear optical phenomenon of shift current 
Therefore, the E ⊥ -space BCP eG/ can be understood as the interlayer BCP  This picture is further augmented by the connotation that the interlayer BCP is featured exclusively by interlayer-hybridized electronic states: According to Eq  ( ), if the state |u n is fully polarized in a specific layer around some momentum k, then G (k) is suppressed 
With the velocity of individual electrons, the charge current density contributed by the electron system can be obtained from where [dk] is shorthand for n d 2 k/(2π) 2 , and the distribution function is taken to be the Fermi function f 0 as we focus on the intrinsic response  The band geometric contributions to ṙ lead to a Hall current
where is intrinsic to the band structure  This band geometric quantity measures the k-space curl of the interlayer BCP over the occupied states, and hence is also a characteristic of layer-hybridized electronic states  Via an integration by parts, it becomes clear that χ int is a Fermi surface property 
Since χ int is a time-reversal even pseudoscalar, it is invariant under rotation, but flips sign under space inversion, mirror reflection and rotoreflection symmetries  As such, χ int is allowed if and only if the system possesses a chiral crystal structure, which is the very case of twisted bilayers  
Moreover, since twisted structures with opposite twist angles are mirror images of each other, whereas the mirror reflection flips the sign of χ int , the direction of Hall current can be reversed by reversing twist direction  Hall rectification and frequency doubling  This effect can be utilized for the rectification and frequency doubling of an in-plane ac input E = E 0 cos ωt, provided that the out-of-plane field has the same frequency, namely E ⊥ = E 0 ⊥ cos (ωt + ϕ) 
The phase difference ϕ between the two fields plays an important role in determining the Hall current, which takes the form of j = j 0 sin ϕ + j 2ω sin(2ωt + ϕ)  ( Here ω is required to be below the threshold for direct interband transition in order to validate the semiclassical treatment, and σ H has the dimension of conductance and quantifies the Hall response with respect to the in-plane input 
In experiment, the Hall output by the crossed nonlinear dynamic Hall effect can be distinguished readily from the conventional nonlinear Hall effect driven by in-plane field alone, as they are odd and even, respectively, in the inplane field  One notes that while the double-frequency component appears for any ϕ, the rectified output is allowed only if the two crossed driving fields are not in-phase or antiphase 
Its on/off, chirality (right or left), and magnitude are all controlled by the phase difference of the two fields  Such a unique tunability provides not only a prominent experimental hallmark of this effect, but also a controllable route to Hall rectification  In addition, reversing the direction of the out-of-plane field switches that of the Hall current, which also serves as a control knob 
Application to tTMDs  We now study the effect quantitatively in tTMDs, using tMoTe 2 as an example (see details of the continuum model in )  For illustrative purposes, we take ω/2π = 0 1 THz and E 0 ⊥ d 0 = 10 mV in what follows  Figures ) and (c) present the electronic band structures along with the layer composition σ z n (k) at twist angles θ = 1 2 • and θ = 2 •  
In both cases, the energy spectra exhibit isolated narrow bands with strong layer hybridization  At θ = 1 2 • , the conductivity shows two peaks ∼ 0 1e 2 /h at low energies associated with the first two valence bands  The third band does not host any sizable conductivity signal  At higher hole-doping levels, a remarkable conductivity peak ∼ e 2 /h appears near the gap separating the fourth and fifth bands 
At θ = 2 • , the conductivity shows smaller values, but the overall trends are similar: A peak ∼ O(0 01)e 2 /h appears at low energies, while larger responses ∼ O(0 1)e 2 /h can be spotted as the Fermi level decreases  One can understand the behaviors of σ H from the interlayer BCP in Eq  ( )  It favors band near-degeneracy regions in k -space made up of strongly layer hybridized electronic states 
As such, the conductivity is most pro- nounced when the Fermi level is located around such regions, which directly accounts for the peaks of response in Fig  that [∂ k × G] z is negligible at lower energies, and it is dominated by positive values as the doping increases, thus the conductivity rises initially 
When the doping level is higher, regions with [∂ k × G] z < 0 start to contribute, thus the conductivity decreases after reaching a maximum  Application to tBG  The second example is tBG  We focus on commensurate twist angles in the large angle limit in the main text , which possess moiré-lattice assisted strong interlayer tunneling via Umklapp processes  
This case is appealing because the Umklapp interlayer tunneling is a manifestation of discrete translational symmetry of moiré superlattice, which is irrelevant at small twist angles and not captured by the continuum model but plays important roles in physical contexts such as higher order topological insulator and moiré excitons  
The Umklapp tunneling is strongest for the commensurate twist angles of θ = 21 8 • and θ = 38 2 • , whose corresponding periodic moiré superlattices have the smallest lattice constant ( √ 7 of the monolayer counterpart)  Such a small moiré scale implies that the exact crystalline symmetry, which depends sensitively on fine details of rotation center, has critical influence on lowenergy response properties 
To capture the Umklapp tunneling, we employ the tight-binding model   Figures ) and (c) show two distinct commensurate structures of tBG at θ = 21 8 • belonging to chiral point groups D 3 and D 6 , respectively  The atomic configurations in Figs  ) are equivalent, which are constructed by twisting AA-stacked bilayer graphene around an overlapping atom site, and that in Fig  ) is obtained by rotating around a hexagonal center 
Band structures of these two configurations are drastically different within a low-energy window of ∼ 10 meV around the κ point   Remarkably, despite large θ, we still get σ H ∼ O(0 001) e 2 /h (D 3 ) and ∼ O(0 1) e 2 /h (D 6 ), which are comparable to those at small angles (cf  Fig  in the Supplemental Material ) 
Such sizable responses can be attributed to the strong interlayer coupling enabled by Umklapp processes   Apart from different intensities, the Hall conductivities in the two stacking configurations have distinct energy dependence: In Fig  , σ H shows a single peak centered at zero energy; In Fig  (f), it exhibits two antisymmetric peaks around zero 
The peaks are centered around band degeneracies, and their profiles can be understood from the distribution of [∂ k × G] z   Figure (d) illustrates the atomic structure of tBG with a twist angle slightly deviating from θ = 21 8 • , forming a supermoiré pattern  In short range, the local stacking geometries resemble the commensurate configurations at θ = 21 8 • , while the stacking registries at different locales differ by a translation 
Similar to the moiré landscapes in the small-angle limit, there also exist high-symmetry locales: Regions A and B enclose the D 3 structure, and region C contains the D 6 configuration  Position-dependent Hall response is therefore expected in such a supermoiré  As the intrinsic Hall signal from the D 6 configuration dominates [see Figs 
3(e) vs (f)], the net response mimics that in Fig    Discussion  We have uncovered the crossed nonlinear dynamical intrinsic Hall effect characteristic of layer hybridized electronic states in twisted bilayers, and elucidated its geometric origin in the k -space curl of interlayer BCP  It offers a new tool for rectification and frequency doubling in chiral vdW bilayers, and is sizable in tTMD and tBG 
Here our focus is on the intrinsic effect, which can be evaluated quantitatively for each material and provides a benchmark for experiments  There may also be extrinsic contributions, similar to the side jump and skew scattering ones in anomalous Hall effect  They typically have distinct scaling behavior with the relaxation time τ from the intrinsic effect, hence can be distinguished from the latter in experiments  
Moreover, they are suppressed in the clean limit ωτ 1 [(ωτ ) 2 1, more precisely]   In high-quality tBG samples, τ ∼ ps at room temperature   Much longer τ can be obtained at lower temperatures  In fact, a recent theory explaining well the resistivity of tBG predicted τ ∼ 10 −8 s at 10 K   As such, high-quality tBG under low temperatures and sub-terahertz input (ω/2π = 0 1 THz) is located in the clean limit, rendering an ideal platform for isolating the intrinsic effect 
This work paves a new route to driving in-plane response by out-of-plane dynamical control of layered vdW structures   The study can be generalized to other observables such as spin current and spin polarization, and the in-plane driving can be statistical forces, like temperature gradient  Such orthogonal controls rely critically on the nonconservation of layer pseudospin degree of freedom endowed by interlayer coupling, and constitute an emerging research field at the crossing of 2D vdW materials, layertronics, twistronics and nonlinear electronics 
This work is supported by the Research Grant Council of Hong Kong (AoE/P-701/20, HKU SRFS2122-7S05), and the Croucher Foundation  W Y  also acknowledges support by Tencent Foundation  Cong Chen, 1, 2, * Dawei Zhai, 1, 2, * Cong Xiao, 1, 2, † and Wang Yao 1, 2, ‡ 1 Department of Physics, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China 2 HKU-UCAS Joint Institute of Theoretical and Computational Physics at Hong Kong, China Extra figures for tBG at small twist angles Figure (a) shows the band structure of tBG with θ = 1 47 • obtained from the continuum model  
The central bands are well separated from higher ones, and show Dirac points at κ/κ points protected by valley U (1) symmetry and a composite operation of twofold rotation and time reversal C 2z T   Degeneracies at higher energies can also be identified, for example, around ±75 meV at the γ point  As the two Dirac cones from the two layers intersect around the same area, such degeneracies are usually accompanied by strong layer hybridization [see the color in the left panel of Fig  ] 
Additionally, it is well-known that the two layers are strongly coupled when θ is around the magic angle (∼ 1 08 • ), rendering narrow bandwidths for the central bands  As discussed in the main text, coexistence of strong interlayer hybridization and small energy separations is expected to contribute sharp conductivity peaks near band degeneracies, as shown in Fig   
In this case, the conductivity peak near the Dirac point can reach ∼ 0 1e 2 /h, while the responses around ±0 08 eV are smaller at ∼ 0 01e 2 /h  The above features are maintained when θ is enlarged, as illustrated in Figs  ) and (c) using θ = 2 65 • and θ = 6 01 •   Since interlayer coupling becomes weaker and the bands are more separated at low energies when θ increases, intensity of the conductivity drops significantly 
We stress that G is not defined at degenerate points, and interband transitions may occur when energy separation satisfies |ε n − ε m | ∼ ω, the effects of which are not included in the current formulations  Consequently, the results around band degeneracies within energy ∼ ω [shaded areas in Fig  ] should be excluded 
Context 2: My Aspergers Child: COMMENTS & QUESTIONS [for Feb , 2017]
I emailed you a while back and you mentioned that I could email when I needed to  Thank you  I last wrote you in December that my son became involved in a dispute involving the local police  We have had 3 court dates  It keeps delaying due to not being able to come to an agreement  But the attorney, even though he was just vaguely familiar with Aspergers, has been very good with Craig  He has the compassion and excellence that is needed here  What started out very bad is turning into a good thing  It will probably take another 90 days or more 
But Craig is working hard  Too hard sometimes  He goes to therapy 3 times a week  Doing excellent  He's more focused and can calm down easier  He's got a lot on his plate but has support from his family  From his attorney  From therapy  And from his work 
He has been renting a room from a lady who has a son with ADHD  It is good for him  I'm a little worried though because since she smokes he wants to find his own place  With all the costs he has to balance it out financially  That is good  I can't help him more than I am which is good  He is stepping up and taking responsibility  He is listening much better 
He is going to have an evaluation today to get an accurate diagnosis  I understand that is a little difficult since he is an adult  Also the PTSD may cover it over  The attorney stated it would help to have the diagnosis 
Aware this is a long update, but thanks for reading  I am fighting much guilt still but I have a lot of peace now  My daughter and her 4 year old son also have Aspergers symptoms  So my life chapters may not close for a while  :-)
My name is Mac  I'm sure you're quite busy, so I'll get right to it I just wanted to pass on compliments on My Aspergers Child and your post, How to Implement the GFCF Diet: Tips for Parents of Autistic Children 
Me and my wife absolutely loved it!
I got a facebook message from him today begging to be able to come home saying he misses home and he will change  He says he will follow rules now  I stated to him the simple rules he has to follow which were - No weed in my house, or smoked in my house, coming home at curfew, going to school, no skipping, no drugs at school, and to drop the attitude of I am 17 I can do whatever I want 
I have made it very clear that if I see any drugs in my home I will be calling the police, as well as if I see signs of it being sold by him I will report him  (He has never had selling amounts in my house,     I believe it's being kept at his "friends" which of course I have no proof of    I just know it is not here 
I know my battle is not over by a long shot, I am sure we will have more consequences and possibly another being kicked out, but I am going to think positive and hope that he learned some form of a valuable lesson here 
Thank you so much for the guidance, never in a million years did I ever think I'd be on this side, (the one needing the help, as I am the one who helps )
I am going to go back to the start of the program like I said earlier and keep notes close by for reference 
Thanks for all you do, helping us all with ODD children/teens
I have a small company providing educational support services to a few families who have children with various disabilities in Ohio  One of the families has multiple adopted children of whom several have significant attachment disorders including RAD  As an experienced teacher and foster parent I have some experience in working with children who have extensive trauma backgrounds  However, I could use additional training  Also working with these children are two staff members with minimal background in attachment disorders who would also benefit from training primarily in behavior management  The primary caregiver to the children does a wonderful job managing their needs  In order to further develop team cohesion, I'm hoping to include her in any training as well 
Is it possible to schedule such a training session with you? If so, please let us know what will work for you including time, place, and cost  Thank you for your assistance 
I just listed to your tapes on dealing with an out of control, defiant teen  I'd like to ask your advice on a particular situation we have  Our 15 year old daughter is smoking pot almost every day at school  Because we had no way to control the situation, we told her, fine, go ahead and smoke weed  However, you will no longer receive the same support from us  You will not have your phone, lunch money to go off campus (she has an account at the school for the cafeteria she can use), and you will be grounded until you can pass a drug test  We will not be testing you except for when you tell us you are ready to be tested  She is now saying she's suicidal because she feels so isolated, yet she continues to smoke weed  In fact, she tried to sneak out last night but was foiled by our alarm system  For the particular drug test we have, I read it takes about 10 days of not smoking to pass the test  What would you do? Please advise 
I am having a problem with my 18 year old son, Danny, with high functioning autism  We finally had him diagnosed when he was 16 years old  I always knew something was going on with him but the doctors misdiagnosed him as bipolar  It's been 2 years now and he will not accept his diagnosis  He won't talk about it and when I try to bring it up he gets very angry  I've tried telling him that it's not a bad thing, that there's been many, many very successful people with Aspergers  He won't tell anyone and refuses to learn about managing life with it  He once shared with me that the other kids at school use it as an insult, like saying someone is so autistic when they do something they don't approve of  So he doesn't want anyone to know  He's turned down services that could help him  He has a girlfriend, going on 8 months  He won't tell her and they're having problems arguing a lot and I wonder if it would help for her to know 
I'm sad that he thinks it's a life sentence to something horrible instead of accepting, embracing it and learning about it more so he maybe can understand why he's struggling  I told him that he doesn't need to shout it out to the whole world but he won't even accept it himself 
I don't know how to help him with it and because he's almost 19 I have limited control now  It's made my life easier knowing what we're dealing with and I think his life would be easier is he accepted it 
Please help me help him 
I am a clinical psychologist in NYC who now has several (!!) children I see who have RAD  In 20 years of practice, I’d seen only one case  Now, I have at least three children with this  I have no training, per se, in working with this children though I know about setting structure, consistency, etc  I do a lot of work with parents about parenting  I work primarily within the school setting in a charter school whose mission is to educate children on the autism spectrum in a mainstream setting  We use Michelle Garcia Winner’s social thinking program with our ASD kids  I also work with gen ed kids in the school who are at-risk; the school is in the inner city from where the majority of our non-ASD kids live 
It would have been so much easier to mention to my adult son that I think (I know he does, but want to ease into the subject)
he has Asperger's when we were living together two years ago  He has since moved to Tennessee working in his field of interest
which is 3-D printing and software development  I am so happy for him that he has found his way into a job that he truly enjoys
even though he's socially isolated 
He's not diagnosed and does not know he has it  How I know is his classic symptoms being sensory issues (fabric feeling like sandpaper)
communication difficulties, meltdowns and much more  Throughout his childhood I just felt he was a bit different  Nothing major stood out and time
just passes, misdiagnosis of ADHD, low frustration, etc  We've talked about his ADHD numerous times (which I now know he doesn't have) 
It's so much easier to communicate with him now that I know he has Asperger's  I keep it "slow and low" in talking, with long moments
of silence and then we connect  It's really too bad that Asperger's got a diagnostic code back in the 90's, yet all the so called doctors,
physiologist's, etc, didn't know how to diagnose it  Too bad 
There seems to be no one answer to "should I tell my adult son he has Asperger's" from a few specialists I asked  He is typical Asperger,
complicated, highly intelligent (high IQ), anxiety at times, socially isolated, hard to make friends  Not knowing how he will react is the hard part 
How will he be better off knowing he has it? Do I wait to tell him in person, or ease into it with him over Skype? He likes direct, honest, concrete communication 
Why is this so hard for me? Maybe because no one know's if he is going to be better off knowing or not  Do you know if people are better off
knowing? I try to get up the courage to just let him know, then I back down 
I have been searching the web looking for advice and came upon your site  I am trying to read blogs, websites, books, and articles to help guide me  I was so happy when you said that I could ask you a question  My husband and I are struggling with my 27 year old son who lives with us 
Kyle is the youngest of 4 sons  He is a college graduate but never could find the "right" job  He has always been quiet and never had a lot of friends  Two years ago, his girlfriend broke up with him  Kyle had an online gambling addiction and was using pot all the time  After the breakup, Kyle was very depressed and started using heroin and finally told my husband he was using  He is now seeing a psychiatrist who has him on suboxone and antidepressants  He is also seeing a psychologist weekly for counseling but it does not seem to be helping 
Last October,, Kyle lost his job, got drunk, and was agitated and came home , fighting with us, damaging our home and being verbally abusive  My other son , age 32, who also lives with us called the police and Kyle got arrested  He is currently in the family court system  He went through an anger management course and now is in substance abuse classes  Kyle continues to verbally abusive to me and blame me for everything  He says he "hates me "and calls me terrible names  At times, he pushes my husband and intimidates me  My husband and I are so upset  We just hired an attorney for him because since he has been going to these classes, he is getting more depressed and not getting better  Kyle continues to drink while taking his meds prescribed by the psychiatrist and then he has his "moods " My husband and I have met once with the psychiatrist just to give him background information when Kyle started with him 
At this point, we do not know what to do  We never thought at this stage of our life, we would be supporting and spending our retirement money on adult children  I do not know why Kyle hates me, I could not have been a better mom  My husband and I have no life and just do not know what it the right path we should take  Kyle does not want anything to do with us  He spends all his time in his room playing football online We have tried tough love versus caring and love and understanding  Do you have any advice for me?
This whole ODD and ADHD is killing me as a parent  I work in the field of adult psych and addictions so I am well educated  I have been dealing with my teen being like this for almost 3 years and I totally lost my cool today with my 17-year-old son to the point I told him he is out of the house  He can never simple rules, comes and goes as he pleases sometimes doesn't come home, just recently back in school from several suspension for drug related    I am just so exhausted  He has made me hate life, hate being a parent and sometimes I just feel like not even being here  I bought your program in hopes to it would help, I am at week three and I feel things are getting worse    what am I doing wrong??
My partner hasn't been diagnosed yet but I know he has aspergers   day to day is a struggle   I feel I'm going crazy with how he makes me feel Feel let down constantly  He lies alot but I've been told they can't but I know he does I just feel trapped and unloved We have a 4yr old daughter together and my main worry with how he is that it will effect our daughter ; (his skills as a parent are so weak He can't disapline at all Feel so alone  he hides it well too I just wondered if things will get worse? He's angry so quick in arguments Scares me etc I can't leave as he's the main bread winner and our daughter loves him to bits Don't know why I'm writing this  Sorry if I'm going on and not making sense :(
I wanted to let you know about a research opportunity for children, teens, and young adults with autism  I am studying the effects of Brazilian Jiu Jitsu, and psychotherapy on helping people with autism develop subjective awareness of others 
I am writing you to see if this might help someone in your practice, or to see if you might know of someone with autism who may benefit from participating in this study  The requirements of the study will be:
1  A participant should be between 7-21 years of age and have a diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder 
2  The participant should enroll in an approved Jiu Jitsu Academy and attend at least two sessions a week for a period of six months 
3  The participant should enroll in social skills groups, provided by my office or be in a steady psychotherapeutic relationship in your office, at least once a week, or minimally two to three times a month 
4  The participant will be given a SRS (Social Responsiveness Scale) test at the beginning of the study, at three months, and again at six months 
If you know of anyone who might benefit from this novel approach to helping to develop social awareness in autism, please do not hesitate to contact me for further information 
I have a 10 year old daughter who has outbursts with prolonged crying almost like tantrums that 2 year olds have when they cannot express themselves 
I had her in therapy from age 6-8 years old for the same thing but I feel that the sessions didn't really help much 
She has severe sensitivities to light, sound, vibration, frequencies which trigger irritability and crying 
We changed her diet and tried getting her involved with activities but she is anti-social and prefers reading than being social  She is terrified of change even in daily routine (even that will trigger prolonged crying) 
It frustrates me because I don't know what else to do with her behavior 
I've tried acupuncture (she refused at the first session); she refuses massage too 
She is an honor-roll student at school and has very minimal issues at school but if she has had a bad day it does result in a tantrum or crying and defiance 
How can I get her tested for Asperger's Syndrome?
Last night our 24 year old son with Aspergers told his dad and I that he is pulling out of the 4 college classes that he recetnly enrolled in because he has not been attending class or turning in his assignments  He paid $2800 (his own money) for tuition and I reminded him of this when he told us but it did not seem to bother him 
This is the 3rd time he has started college courses and has not completed them  (He also took some concurrent college classes while he was in high school that he failed)  This is a son who basically had a 4 0 grade point average through 10th grade and got a 34 on the ACT the first time he took it 
With the news that he was once again not sticking with college courses I did not sleep well  When I got up this mornning I began looking online for help in how to deal with his situation  I found your "Launching Adult Children With Aspergers" and purchased it  Most of what is included are things we have done or did with our son throughout his life  I was hoping for more help so I am emailing you now in hopes of more specific ideas 
We noticed some things with our son, Taylor, as a yound child but as we had not heard of Aspergers at that time we just did what we thought would help him  As a toddler and a child at pre-school he generally went off on his own to play  When I talked to his pre-school teacher about my concerns (that I was worried he would end up a hermit) she said she did not see him being a loner and that he seemed to interact fine with others in many situations  We worked with him on making eye contact when talking with others  We explained different emotions in people's faces and mannerisms to help him know how to interact with others  We discussed the fact that people would say things that did not mean what they souneded like - such as "I'm so hungry I could eat a horse"  As we did these things he worked hard to better understand communication with others 
During his 4th grade year I had a teacher from the gifted program ask me if I had ever heard of Aspergers  I told her that I had not heard of it  She proceeded to read me some of the charateristics and so many of them described my son  So we had him tested by the school district during the summer between 4th and 5th grade and they did find that he had Aspergers but that he was high functioning  We then set him up with and EIP which stayed with him until his sophomore year  We pulled him from it at that time because we had moved and the new district was requiring him to take one class a day that was a study class  This reduced the number of required classes he could take and he was doing fine with his studies at the time 
It was during the 2nd half of his Junior year that we noticed some of his grades going down  Then during his Senior year is when he started skipping classes and not doing assignments  We had not realized it before then but we soon became aware that he was addicted to gaming  He would go to the library or somewhere else on campus and play games on the computer rather than go to class  It was also at this time that he began lying about his actions (so as not to get in trouble) 
Based on his grades and his ACT score he received offers from colleges for full tuition scholarships  He chose the college where he had taken concurrent classes during his high school years  But he proceeded to skip class and not turn in assignments so he lost his scholarship and quit attending college  During this time he was only able to find employment through an employment agency where he was mostly sent to manuel labor type jobs (which is not something he enjoys but he did it anyway)  It was during this time that at one place had gone to on numerous occasions he was told if he came late one more time they would tell the emplyment agency they did not want him to come there anymore  (This seemed to make an impression on him because he has continued to be reliable and responsbile at his places of employment) 
At 19 1/2 he left to serve a 2 year full-time mission for our church  He completed his mission successfully  (I don't think it was without some struggle, stress and depression, but he was able to pick himself up and move on from those times) 
When he came home he started working for the employment agency again but began looking for employment elsewhere  He got a job at a local Chick Fil-A where he has worked for 3 years  He started college again shortly after he came home but as before it was short lived  He did finish out the semester but failed most of the classes due to his skipping class and not turning in assignments  When he skipped class he would usually sleep in his car 
Taylor's life consists of working (where to the best of our knowledge) he does well, he is reliable and his employer likes him  When he comes home from work he either sleeps or plays video games or other games - such as kakuro  He spendes most of his time in the basement where his bedroom is and this is where he games  Taylor owns his own car, bought his own laptop and very rarely spends money  He pays us $200 /month to still live at home, unloads the dishwasher on a regular basis and does the weekly garbage  However, his room is a mess and he only cleans his bathroom when I tell him he needs to clean it 
Taylor used to read quite a bit and loved to learn  It has just been in his adult years that he has not read as much - I think because of his gaming addiction  Taylor goes to church on a regular basis but sleeps through the main meeting  In Sunday class room settings he stays awake - I think because he is able to particpate in discussions 
Taylor has only had 2 real friends since entering Junior High school  And as of now he only keeps in contact with one of them who still lives in Georgia  We have lived in Utah since the summer of 2007 and he has never had a friend to do things with since we have lived here  He has two younger siblings, a brother 22 and a sister 20  They love Taylor and spend time with him when they are home  They are both at college and doing well 
Throughout Taylor's school years he has seen a counsleor on a fairly regular basis  One summer during junior high he attended a weekly class where he interacted with other kids with Aspergers  We did see a lot of change in him from this group  After he returned from his mission he went to see a counselor for a short period - this counselor tried to help him with some social skills  His dad and I went with him the first 3 or 4 times but we found out that after we quit going with him he only went a few more times and then scheduled appointments but did not show a couple of the times  We only found this out when a bill came for a "no show" appointment 
I don't know if this is too much information but were are in dire need of help for him  In the information that we purchased from you you mentioned that you do coaching for Aspergers adults  I don't know if you can help us but I thought I would check with you just in case 
Alas I think I have found your information too late to save my marriage but I am hoping to save myself 
I am currently going through a very very painful separation after a 27 year relationship with my husband whom I am convinced has aspergers syndrome  It is a long and painful story and I am desperately trying to process it all alongside dealing with a very conflictual separation  My partner is angry non communicative and totally dismissive of me and our long shared history 
He walked out last year after I discovered he had been visiting massage parlours and developed a relationship with an illegal Chinese escourt whom he subsequently moved in with  He had been seeing this woman behind my back for over 18 months  The pain of all this indescribable and his dismissal of my pain and very existence beyond belief 
Leading up to this I had been battling anxiety and depression which my husband found very hard to cope with 
Over the years of our relationship I knew something was off but I just could not put my finger on it  I often felt a complete lack of validation and empathy  Communication was also difficult as my husband was defensive and unwilling to look at issues in our marriage 
Please Mark could you help me validate some of this pain and try and make dense of 27 years of my life without drowning in fear guilt and despair about my future 
Thank you for listening and your site 
I have had problems with drunkenness, being late for school, not handing in school work, buying pot from a dealer etc  I chose to focus on the drinking and did the grounding then (grounding happened 3 times)  I also stopped sleep overs at friends 100%  I have stopped handing out money for no reason or even buying treats like chocolate 
I did lose it one evening (and didn't do the poker face) when I was trying to unplug the internet at midnight on a school night (she’s always late for school so I am trying to get her to sleep at a reasonable hour)  I was physically stopped and pushed around so I slapped my daughter (it was not hard)  This ended up with her saying she didn’t want to come home (the next day after school)  By this stage, I also had enough and didn’t go get her  I thought I am not begging  You will run out of money soon  It was quite a relief to have some peace  Daughter’s Dad was in town (from another country) and called a family meeting with the counsellor  To cut a long story short, daughter and her counsellor put it on the table that daughter wants to go live somewhere else (with her friends family) because of the stress at home with me (we live on our own) (i e  stricter rules and her bucking up against it) 
I didn’t really want this but made a compromise that daughter would go there Tues morning – Friday afternoon as the friend is an A student whereas my daughter is failing  They do the same subjects  I made the decision at the end of the day based on what is good for me – some time away from the daughter  I also thought of your book when the child went to live with the grandparents – daughter will dig her own hole over at the friend’s house  They have a week day no going out policy which made me think it is OK  I went and discussed with them the problems experienced (drinking, pot, late nights, not handing in work)
I am also trying to follow the let go of school thing per your book  I find it really difficult to remain calm when I can see daughter on her phone and watching series (when I have her on the weekends) when I know there are projects due  I hired her a private tutor once a week for help with a subject  The tutor has just fired my daughter for not handing in work and being not committed  It’s not the first time private tutoring has not been appreciated  The school give me a report back on a Friday as to whether everything is handed in  The deal is – if the work is not handed in – no pocket money and no Friday night out)  Her school is a "progressive" school and there are no repercussions for her being late or not handing in work  I would change schools if I could but there are only 8 months left of school (she turns 18 in August) 
We have just completed the first week and beginning week two of your material  We are agreeing with your take and see our son and ourselves in most of what you are saying  Prior to finding your material and starting your program we had been having extreme out of control behaviors and had to call the police because he was breaking things in our house and pushed my husband  This happened three weeks ago  After that incident we took away privileges ie  PS4, phone (which had already been taken for a few days), and friends  So, last week while doing your program he already didn’t have privileges and has continued with poor behavior – name calling, throwing things, slamming doors  We are not sure when to give privileges back  He has been given the privilege of playing with friends on occasion  His 13th birthday is tomorrow  This past weekend, for his birthday my husband and he went boar hunting  Of course we debated about it but decided to go ahead since it was his bday  We are cooking some of the meet on the grill tomorrow night for his bday and inviting a couple of his friends over for a cookout  No more gifts other than cards and balloons  We are wondering if we should go ahead and give him his privileges back and not sure how to do it  Last Friday morning we attempted to talk giving him a date to return privileges and that conversation ended with him getting angry but he gathered from our conversation that he is getting his stuff back on his bday  We are starting week 2 assignments today but not sure how to handle what was already in place  Of course, we aren’t seeing the respect and responsibility we are looking for but realize it has been a long time  We were wanting him to pay for his phone and thought it might be a good time to introduce that idea  Allowing him to earn his phone  We expect that he will be angry with this idea and not sure how to implement 
My son and myself are interested in a inpatient Aspergers program  We line in Calif which is preferable  My son is very high functioning and was diagnosed dry late  He was eight years old  He has never been in or attended a full day of class  Partially due to depression,anxiety, and trouble with his ADHD also his aversion and being bullied and of course his Aspergers  He will not attend his freshmen year due to surgery on both Achilles' tendons from walking on his toes  With physical therapy he should be ready by his sophomore year! We all feel he needs in patient therapy to give him the tools on how to work with his issues in a structured setting and a place that will give him tools for the rest of his life 
In my utter desperation to find a way to get some help for my daughter's increasingly challenging behaviour I trawled the internet to see if I could find some strategies that would provide specific methods on dealing with teenagers with Asperger's syndrome  When I came across your website, I couldn't believe that every statement you made was exactly what I have been going through with my daughter  She has just turned 14 last week, and was diagnosed with Asperger's/ Autism Spectrum Disorder 15 months ago  I have already been seeing a child psychologist for the past five months, however the methods she has been advising have not been very effective 
Our main difficulty with our daughter is her overwhelming obsession to use her cell phone (and to a lesser extent her laptop) constantly  Without any restriction, she will be on it every minute of the day, and will be awake until the early hours every day  We have tried to incorporate her input around rules as to when she has to give in her phone, but she is unwilling to compromise on a time that she should give it to us, believing that she should have unlimited use  I believe she is unable to do any adequate study or homework, as she is constantly having to look at the phone  We have tried to put rules in place that she has to give in her phone and laptop on school nights at 22:15  If she is able to do this then she is given rewards, and if she doesn't then she knows that there will be consequences  The consequence has been restricted use the following day  However, this is usually where we fail, because taking her phone away from her results in tantrums, screaming, and even threatening to harm herself  This behaviour is relentless to the point where the whole family becomes deeply distressed, and inevitably results in her getting the phone back 
This obsession is affecting her schoolwork, and more severely her eyesight  She has become very shortsighted, and her eyesight continues to deteriorate as a result of holding the phone or laptop very close, and mostly in the dark without any lights on  My husband and I have a constant battle on our hands daily, in all areas of discipline with our daughter, but our main concern is that we have been unable to find a way to minimise this obsessive behaviour centred around her phone and laptop  Please can you provide some strategies that can help us specifically with this problem 
First of all, I thank you for developing this program and I am only at the first stage of assignment 1  I have loads of books I have bought, attended psychiatrists for my son and myself, family therapy, occupational therapy, begged and prayed for change but have been dealing with behavioural issues for so long I am definitely exhausted and resentful 
I am a mum to a 15 yr old boy with ASD, dyslexia, OCD and ODD  Sorry to focus on the labels but just to give you an idea of what I am dealing with  I also have a 13 yr old son whom finds his brother’s behaviours difficult, embarassing and challenging  My husband whom is not in great health ( he had a cerebral aneurysm clamped two years ago and has two further aneurysms that are inoperable so endures fatigue, headaches and stress)  We have however a pet cat that is very social and a calming influence in the home! I was fortunate enough to have loving parents but I lost both my mum and dad in 2008 and 2015  My inlaws are elderly and quite directly say they are too old to help us so it feels we are alone in dealing with the issues we have 
I am desperate for change as the household is one of stress and anger and I feel all the control lies in my son Patrick’s hands  I am hopeful your programme can make life better for all of us but I wonder if it is too early to ask you two questions?
The first lies with what to do when Patrick goes into my other son Brendan’s room and will either turn on a light when he is sleeping, yell when he is on his phone or create some disturbance  He will not leave the room when asked to do so and the situation always escalates into yelling and Brendan attempting to physically remove him  This happens regularly and always ends badly with doors slamming, my husband being woken and myself in tears feeling the lack of control and also I admit I seem to think “Why me?” which rationally I know is of no help 
The second problem is leaving the house for school  Patrick refuses personal hygiene (either morning or night) and any request to even brush his teeth is fraught with swearing and abuse  If I can get him to shower, he will watch the water roll down the drain and turn up the water really high temp (mu husband has had to turn down the thermostat on the hot water service) without so much as getting wet  My husband leaves for work at 6am but I leave at 745 to work as a nurse in a busy outpatients department in the Alfred Hospital (Melbourne)  My work is my sanity as it is a paid break from home but most days I am late which is causing considerable stress and anxiety not to mention my responsibility to do my job  Patrick simply refuses to leave the house and as much as I am tempted to just walk out and leave I know the house would be left unlocked and wonder if Patrick would even attend school  The time I need to leave is not negotiable but Patrick uses this to his advantage and seems to delight in stressing me out and subsequently speeding to work in a frazzled mess 
The interesting and frustrating element in all of this is that although he is socially isolated at school (he has no friends) and academically challenged his behaviour at school is not a problem  He is quiet and his teachers report he does his best and is compliant and well mannered  It is like a Jekyll and Hyde situation where another side of him at home is so angry and abusive yet at school this behaviour does not happen 
I’m Jackie, I now work primarily as a freelance tech writer, after starting my career in software development and moving on to teach IT to young adults at a variety of colleges and schools 
My freelance work is pretty varied and looks at many aspects of the computer industry as a whole, and I’ve just recently completed a piece which gives help and advice to anyone wanting to become a game designer, which you can read here: http://www gamedesigning org/become-a-game-designer/  It highlights the hard work and effort it takes to get into such a role, and also how you can further your career and continue to learn and improve as you go  I hope you’ll agree it shows that starting work in the industry takes dedication and skill and that becoming a game designer isn’t just a fly-by-night job!
If you’d be interested in sharing a quick mention of my work on your blog that would be really wonderful and I’d appreciate the chance to get my work out there to a wider audience  Alternatively, I’d be happy to write a short blurb or paragraph or two (or a longer piece - just let me know) highlighting the key points because I think some of your readers might get a lot of value from it 
My son just turned 15 and is a freshman in high school  Although this is his first year in a general ed environment, he is struggling with behaviors in school  He has meltdowns and does not express why he would have them until much later  Once we all know what caused it, the school will accommodate him and try to "change up" things so as not to cause his meltdown  Once that is resolved, another issue comes up and causes him to melt down  He is a high functioning and academically does well, when he wants to do the work  We battle at home over homework  He does not care how it is done, as long as he hands it in  He thinks failing a test is ok, at least he took the test  Homework is never on his mind when he gets home from school  If I never prompt him, he would never open is backpack  He can be aggressive but is never intentionally trying to hurt anyone  He may push over a chair in school, but it is not directed at anyone  We know how that in itself could hurt someone who gets hit by it though  He is defiant in that he only wants to do what interests him  He does not go out by himself (still immature), or abuse alcohol or drugs and never curses  He is a very funny kid and very talented  His main problems are task avoidance and seeking attention  He can be disrespectful to adults in that he is "cheeky" with them, trying to be funny or cute  And he has no "filters" 
I’ve just finished reading your Living with an Aspergers Partner ebook  I found it so informative, thank you 
You offered some personal advise, and i wanted to run a situation past you and seek your input as to a strategy for what to do next 
I’ve been seeing a guy for about 7 months now who I believe has Aspergers  I came to this conclusion months ago and I don’t think he realizes, (or acknowledges) although he is aware he has some traits 
He’s highly intelligent and successful, a pattern seeker, has a tendency to focus on the project to hand to the total exclusion of all else for as long sit takes (work or home) socially awkward (has learned coping strategies), sensitive to loud noise, high anxiety with control strategies, black and white thinking etc  He’s currently not working and I’ve seen a slow withdrawal over the last 6 weeks, including the need to ‘escape’ and leave a situation at least once 
He also has a bipolar ex overseas who has primary custody one daughter where there has been ongoing patterns of drama which has recently increased 
Over the past couple of months (since stopping work and drama increase) I’ve gone from being ‘wonderful’ in his eyes to him now being sorry and not having the ‘urge’ to spend close/intimate time with me and offering friendship  Since he shared that with me in a message he’s stonewalled and has retreated to the safety of minimal messages and talks about not knowing what best to say and not being able to find the right words somehow 
He’s a good kind man who I feel is struggling  I’m concerned about his anxiety and possibly the risk of depression  I’m fairly resilient and whilst i’m disappointed he doesn’t want to pursue a relationship with me, i’m concerned for him and his well being  One of his very few close friends is also just leaving the country to live overseas 
The strategy I’ve used so far is simply to back off and give him space  I’ve asked to take him up on an original offer he made to talk but haven’t pushed it  I also haven’t been aggressive or accusatory in the few messages i’ve sent 
Any advise you could give would be greatly appreciated,
Carli who is 10 years old and has had behavioral issues her whole life  The other night she came home very upset after having a conflict with a friend  She was at her friend's house and her and her friend wanted to get on the computer and the older sister was using it  Carli made up a story that someone was at the door to get the older sister off the computer  Her friend didn't understand that she was making up a story to get the sister off the computer  She got excited that someone was at the door and ran downstairs to answer the door  In the process of getting the door, she fell and yelled at Carli  Carli became extremely upset  She was able to control her feelings at her friend's house, but when she came home, she proceeded to cry extremely loudly for over an hour  Her dad spent most of that time with her, talking to her and trying to calm her down  After an hour, I asked him if he could please tell her to be more quiet because the other members of the household were trying to go to sleep 
My question is    how do I as the girlfriend, handle this? He did not like that I asked her to be quiet  We have a rule that if she is having bad behavior, and can't calm down in 5 minutes, he takes her out of the house because her yelling doesn't stop for a long time and is very upsetting to everyone in the household  I would like to ask him to do this with this kind of situation as well  Is this a reasonable request? His thought was that she shouldn't be made to calm down, because everyone handles being upset in a different way  But, she was literally sobbing and wailing very loudly 
My other question is should she have been told that if she wouldn't have lied, this wouldn't have happened? She has a history of lying and of not accepting responsibility for her actions  My boyfriend became very upset with me when I brought this up  He was being very sympathetic and understanding to her  I feel like he was giving her negative attention, and being an over indulgent parent by not putting his foot gown and saying, "you can't carry on like this, even though you are upset"  Please let me know how we can handle these situations better 
I am contacting you for help with adult AS  I am taking initiative to pre screen potential therapists to help my current boyfriend get therapy and help with Adult AS 
He has seen many therapists, but it seems like they aren’t really helping him with his problems  They don’t seem to understand how his (undiagnosed) AS would affect therapy approaches  For example, he may not share enough in therapy session and I’m assuming an AS therapist would recognize that is part of the AS and employ strategies to get information from him that helps with treatment  Sometime he tunes out when he is processing something heavy or that he doesn’t want to hear necessarily, or he gets distracted and I’m hoping an As therapist would recognize that and get that he may need repeated something for example, if this is happening 
He is currently suffering from depression that appears clinical in nature as well as reoccurring negative thoughts about something specific that has been worrying him about our relationship  Today he told me these reoccurring thoughts happen during all waking hours unless he watches TV, he never gets a break from them and they make him feel like he is going crazy  As his girlfriend, I am extremely concerned that he cannot get relief from these thoughts and that the therapists he is seeing are unable to help him with his problems  Therefore, I am taking initiative to try and help him find better therapy options, because I want to see him someone who can better help him get to the bottom of things and help him with the challenges he is facing  He really needs an advocate that will help him go deep to figure things out and not just assume therapies are working well, without seeing changes or getting supporting feedback from him in that regard 
Here are some questions I am trying to ask in advance to find the right people to help us with this  As you may know, insurance for these therapies are not often available  We don’t have a lot of money to go from therapist to therapist to find the right person and are hoping prescreening will help 
I recently downloaded your e-book and listened to your talks and your information is by far the most helpful I have been able to find to date  It's very accurately describes my situation as an NT wife married to a very probable AS husband  I think you for taking the time to write this and sharing your insights as well as the experiences of many of your clients  It has really helped me understand the last 32 years of our marriage and get a grasp on how to move forward 
One area that is of primary concern to me, that I did not see addressed, is stimming  I believe that is the behavior my husband is showing through constant vocal singing, repetition of words, shouting out, as well as slapping himself in the chest and general nervous activity  It is very loud and disruptive to our household and it is often a relief when he is not at home  I think there may be a level of Tourette's syndrome as well 
I did some searches on the Internet and could not find anything that really describes his behavior  Most of what I found was flapping or children's behavior  I understand that it is a release of nervous tension but I am really trying to find some strategies to help him stop this behavior as it is extremely frustrating and builds my resentment in dealing with it daily  A lot of it is embarrassing as well and sounds childish to me 
He usually does this when close family members are around and will reign himself in if he is around other people besides us  When we are home it is constant  He also has a lot of anger, mostly at himself, and blows up at unimportant things, it is as if he has a ton of negative energy inside him that need to get out and stimming is one outlet 
I will try to build my acceptance of it, but I also would just like him to stop especially the loudest and most annoying portions  Would you have any resources you could point me to?
Context 3: The future of mobile CPUs, part 1: Today’s fork in the road | Ars Technica
2013 may be a big year for the evolution of smartphones and tablets 
Mobile computing's rise from niche market to the mainstream is among the most significant technological trends in our lifetimes  And to a large extent, it's been driven by the bounty of Moore’s Law—the rule that transistor density doubles every 24 months  Initially, most mobile devices relied on highly specialized hardware to meet stringent power and size budgets  But with so many transistors available, devices inevitably grew general-purpose capabilities  Most likely, that wasn't even the real motivation  The initial desire was probably to reduce costs by creating a more flexible software ecosystem with better re-use and faster time to market  As such, the first smartphones were very much a novelty, and it took many years before the world realized the potential of such devices  Apple played a major role by creating innovative smartphones that consumers craved and quickly adopted 
To some extent, this is where we still stand today  Smartphones are still (relatively) expensive and primarily interesting to the developed world  But over the next 10 years, this too will change  As Moore’s Law rolls on, the cost of a low-end smartphone will decline  At some point, the incremental cost will be quite minimal and many feature phones of today will be supplanted by smartphones  A $650 unsubsidized phone is well beyond the reach of most of the world compared to a $20 feature phone, but a $30 to $40 smartphone would naturally be very popular 
In this grand progression, 2013 will certainly be a significant milestone for mobile devices, smartphones and beyond  It's likely to be the first year in which tablets out-ship notebooks in the US  And in the coming years, this will lead to a confluence of high-end tablets and ultra-mobile notebooks as the world figures out how these devices co-exist, blend, hybridize, and/or merge 
Against this backdrop, in this two-part series, we'll explore the major trends and evolution for mobile SoCs  More importantly, we'll look to where the major vendors are likely going in the next several years 
Tablet and phone divergence
While phones and tablets are mobile devices that often share a great deal of software, it's becoming increasingly clear the two are very different products  These two markets have started to diverge and will continue doing so over time 
From a technical perspective, smartphones are far more compact and power constrained  Smartphone SoCs are limited to around 1W, both by batteries and by thermal dissipation  The raison d’etre of a smartphone is connectivity, so a cellular modem is an absolute necessity  For the cost sensitive-models that make up the vast majority of the market, the modem is integrated into the SoC itself  High-end designs favor discrete modems with a greater power budget instead  The main smartphone OSes today are iOS and Android, though Windows is beginning to make an appearance (perhaps with Linux or BlackBerry on the horizon)  Just as importantly, phone vendors like HTC must pass government certification and win the approval of carriers  There is very much a walled-garden aspect, where carriers control which devices can be attached to their networks, and in some cases devices can only be sold through a certain carrier  The business model places consumers quite far removed from the actual hardware 
In contrast, tablets are far more akin to the PC both technically and economically  The power budget for tablet SoCs is much greater, up to 4W for a passively cooled device and as high as 7-8W for systems with fans  This alone means there is a much wider range of tablet designs than smartphones  Moreover, the default connectivity for tablets is Wi-Fi rather than a cellular modem  The vast majority of tablets do not have cellular modems, and even fewer customers actually purchase a wireless data plan  As a result, cellular modems are almost always optional discrete components of the platform  The software ecosystem is relatively similar, with Microsoft, Apple, and Google OSes available  Because tablets eschew cellular modems, the time to market is faster, and they are much more commonly sold directly to consumers rather than through carriers  In terms of usage models, tablets are much more PC-like, with reasonable-sized screens that make games and media more attractive 
Looking forward, these distinctions will likely become more pronounced  Many tablets today use high-end smartphone SoCs, but the difference in power targets and expected performance is quite large  As the markets grow in volume, SoCs will inevitably bifurcate to focus on one market or the other  Even today, Apple is doing so, with the A6 for phones and the larger A6X for tablets  Other vendors may need to wait a few years to have the requisite volume, but eventually the two markets will be clearly separate 
Horizontal business model evolution
Another aspect of the mobile device market that is currently in flux and likely to change in the coming years is the business model for the chip and system vendors  Currently, Apple is the only company truly pursuing a vertically integrated model, where all phones and tablets are based on Apple’s own SoC designs and iOS  The tight integration between hardware and software has been a huge boon for Apple, and it has yielded superb products 
Samsung is one of the few others companies that takes a vertically integrated approach to phones and tablets, although in truth its strategy seems to be ambivalent on that point  Unlike Apple, Samsung’s SoCs are readily available to third parties, and some Samsung devices, such as the S7562 Galaxy S Duos, use SoCs from competitors  More recently though, there has been a trend of Samsung devices using Samsung SoCs, at least for the premier products  For the moment, Samsung’s approach is best characterized as a hybrid, particularly as the company lacks a bespoke OS 
The rest of the major SoC vendors (e g , Intel, Qualcomm, Nvidia, TI, Mediatek, etc ) have stayed pretty far away from actual mobile devices  These companies tend to focus on horizontal business models that avoid competing with customers or suppliers 
In the long term, mobile devices are likely to evolve similarly to the PC and favor a horizontal business model  The real advantage is one of flexibility; as costs drop and the market expands, it will be increasingly necessary for vendors like HTC to offer a wide range of phones based on radically different SoCs  While a vertically integrated company like Apple can focus and maintain leadership in a specific (and highly lucrative) niche, it would be very difficult to expand in many growing areas of the market  The differences between an iPhone 6 and a $20 feature phone are tremendous and would be very difficult for a single company to bridge 
However, SoC vendors will attempt to reap the benefits of vertical integration by providing complete reference platforms to OEMs  Conceptually, this is a form of "optional" system integration, where the phone vendor or carrier can get the entire platform from the SoC supplier  This has the principal advantages of reducing time to market while also providing a baseline quality and experience for consumers  Currently, this approach has mostly been tested in emerging markets, but it's likely to become more common over time  There is a crucial distinction between reference platforms and vertical integration  Namely, OEMs can always choose to customize a platform to differentiate, and the SoC vendor avoids dealing with consumers directly  Typically, most of the customization is in terms of software on top of a base operating system 
Quote:Moreover, that will make the transition to a 10nm node even more difficult, as the foundries will have to move from 20nm interconnects to 10nm interconnects and skip a generation The advances in technology lately allowing components on such a small scale to even be envisioned, much less planned for, are truly amazing 
Off topic: show
I present the first generation 'non-technical' rock:
I don't think your horizontal market development theory is supported by facts  Samsung and Apple are more vertically oriented than their competition, for starters  I know this article is narrowly focused on the hardware, but MS and Intel getting into hardware, Amazon getting into hardware, Google buying Moto, this is all vertical integration  How can you support the idea that this trend will be reversed with no real justification? I'm sure mobile chips will continue to specialize, but I don't think this means what you think it means  Automobile companies started making their own engines and with rare exceptions, never went back to being more horizontal  Same with retail and their store brands  Same with cloud companies and their servers  Same with mobile companies and their OSs  The horizontal market of PCs created by long-lasting standards and loose hegemony is the exception, not the norm 
Why wouldn't the foundries be able close the process gap with Intel? Is it a matter of money? Scale?
I'm not so sure about several things:1- Moore's law's relevance  Moore's Law is about ICs  ICs are not as big a part of mobile computers as they are of desktops, even of laptops: screens, batteries, radios are a huge part of tablets' and phones' costs, as opposed to the bare SoC + RAM 2- The tablet vs phone dichotomy  For some reason (probably price insensitivity due to subsidies), Phones have a tendency to be more powerful than Tablets, ie phone SoCs are more than good enough for tablets  Since the OS and peripherals are the same, it makes more sense to design and build just one type of SoC, and just disable the phone-modem part of it (even the other radios are still required: BT, Wifi, GPS   ), same as Intel disable cache and cores for their entry-level CPUs  Once you're fabbing a SoC, it makes more sense to make more of the same than to setup a separate run of a cut-down SoC on an older process, unless volumes are huge  We might still be getting previous-generation, well amortized SoCs in cheaper tablets, though 3- On the contrary, I see a tablet and phone convergence (the ugly phablet)  I'm patiently waiting for the new 6"+ phones to replace my Nook Color and Galaxy Note 1 with a single device 4- The advantage of diversity ? Software is becoming ever more important than hardware  Multiplying SoCs means multiplying product development costs, making support and updates more difficult    Again, unless volumes are huge, OEMs are probaly better off going the way of the car industry and using modular "platforms" housed in different chassis with various screen sizes, keyboards, radios, digitizers   I'm wondering why the "single device" trend does not figure in your analysis  Is it stillborn ? Does it have no impact nor dependency on/with SoCs ?
Samsung has its own bespoke OS: Bada and it is used on an extensive line of devices  I think there are numbers somewhere that it outsold Windows Phone 7 for a time 
gypsumfantastic wrote:Why wouldn't the foundries be able close the process gap with Intel? Is it a matter of money? Scale?First mover advantage 
SoC? System on a Chip I guess?
You're way off on the Moore's Law/cost of smartphones point  The processors used in today's high-end smartphones are already cheap, around $25  And there are less expensive options if you want a lower end product  In fact, the hardware in the whole smartphone is relatively cheap  Analyst's estimate the Z10's materials cost around $160, the iPhone 5 around $140  They're using expensive glass and metals, then there's the battery, memory, etc  which means the processor is a small factor of the cost And then there's the jump from $140 in materials to the unsubsidized costs  The reason these phones cost $650 is because of the high margins these companies are able to get and the high cost of hardware design and/or software development  But the point is that making the processors 4 times better/cheaper isn't going to change the economics of the smartphone  What will change the economics is commoditized designs and software and cheaper materials all around  Then you'll have a $50 smartphone that's decent 
Last edited by ggeezz on Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:17 am
bigterp wrote:SoC? System on a Chip I guess?Yup 
gypsumfantastic wrote:Why wouldn't the foundries be able close the process gap with Intel? Is it a matter of money? Scale?Money and momentum, the x86 market is a huge money maker for Intel so it is able to recoup its huge investments for advanced foundries 
Quote:Currently, the only products using 3D integration are FPGAs from Xilinx,Doesn't Sony use it in the PS Vita? I thought I read somewhere that they had the CPU, main memory (2 dies) and video memory, so 4 dies in total, sitting on top of each other all on the same chip 
renoX wrote:gypsumfantastic wrote:Why wouldn't the foundries be able close the process gap with Intel? Is it a matter of money? Scale?Money and momentum, the x86 market is a huge money maker for Intel so it is able to recoup its huge investments for advanced foundries Exactly and I would clarify that it's all about margins, the difference between what it costs to make a chip and what it sells for  The margins for desktop and server processors is huge because a) the whole product is expensive so $200 to $1000 for the chip is acceptable, and b) Intel has huge advantages in that space and little competition So Intel can afford to do the R&D to stay ahead of the curve and keep their position  When your smartphone chip sells for $25 you can't do the R&D to leapfrog a company that sells Xeons for $1000 and Core i5's for $200 
I am happy to see Kanter here at Ars, I like his writing and he maintains Real World Tech, where Linus Torvalds often shows up to comment on CPU arch and other interesting topics 
ggeezz wrote:renoX wrote:gypsumfantastic wrote:Why wouldn't the foundries be able close the process gap with Intel? Is it a matter of money? Scale?Money and momentum, the x86 market is a huge money maker for Intel so it is able to recoup its huge investments for advanced foundries Exactly and I would clarify that it's all about margins, the difference between what it costs to make a chip and what it sells for  The margins for desktop and server processors is huge because a) the whole product is expensive so $200 to $1000 for the chip is acceptable, and b) Intel has huge advantages in that space and little competition So Intel can afford to do the R&D to stay ahead of the curve and keep their position  When your smartphone chip sells for $25 you can't do the R&D to leapfrog a company that sells Xeons for $1000 and Core i5's for $200 Spot on Intel are able to piggyback other development efforts off the highly lucrative mainstream x86 market which generates the huge sums of money to fund their amazing fab technology The question for the future is how the economics will stack up when overall device costs fall significantly and there is a big downward pressure on SoC prices  In that situation, can Intel still justify bringing their A-game to a market where products are essentially commoditised and you have processors selling for a only a few dollars each?The lesson from their previous involvement in the DRAM market is that they probably won't want to be involved because there isn't enough money to be made to justify manufacturing phone SoCs on a cutting edge, or near cutting edge process  In that scenario, Intel may not totally abandon the market but they might just stick to manufacturing SoCs on nodes that are a step or two behind the state of the art 
solomonrex wrote:I don't think your horizontal market development theory is supported by facts  Samsung and Apple are more vertically oriented than their competition, for starters  I know this article is narrowly focused on the hardware, but MS and Intel getting into hardware, Amazon getting into hardware, Google buying Moto, this is all vertical integration  How can you support the idea that this trend will be reversed with no real justification? I'm sure mobile chips will continue to specialize, but I don't think this means what you think it means  Automobile companies started making their own engines and with rare exceptions, never went back to being more horizontal  Same with retail and their store brands  Same with cloud companies and their servers  Same with mobile companies and their OSs  The horizontal market of PCs created by long-lasting standards and loose hegemony is the exception, not the norm Yea, each year Amazon, MS, Apple and Google look more and more the same 
Intel cannot abandon the phone/tablet market  Desktop/laptop sales are stagnating/decreasing and phones/tablets are on the rise  This trend is only going to increase going forward But you're right, they're going to have use their fabs that are a step or two behind the cutting the edge  But they're going to have to up their game in the tablet space to even be able to do that 
gypsumfantastic wrote:Why wouldn't the foundries be able close the process gap with Intel? Is it a matter of money? Scale?Intel's called Chipzilla for a reason up
Lagrange wrote:The question for the future is how the economics will stack up when overall device costs fall significantly and there is a big downward pressure on SoC prices  In that situation, can Intel still justify bringing their A-game to a market where products are essentially commoditised and you have processors selling for a only a few dollars each?The lesson from their previous involvement in the DRAM market is that they probably won't want to be involved because there isn't enough money to be made to justify manufacturing phone SoCs on a cutting edge, or near cutting edge process  In that scenario, Intel may not totally abandon the market but they might just stick to manufacturing SoCs on nodes that are a step or two behind the state of the art I think the processing is a bigger advantage than many realize  If Intel can stay ahead in process design - which this article seems to indicate - they should have a major advantage  All else being equal a 14nm chip should be significantly faster and more efficient than the same chip at 22nm  Add in the fact that yields increase geometrically - you can fit a lot more 14nm chips on a given wafer size vs 22nm (or 32nm for the other manufacturers ) and you have a very appealing proposition  And then add in the fact that Intel actually has a pretty good graphics stack and IP  It's not a sure thing by any means, but I suspect ARM may have just prodded a sleeping giant edit: Also worth noting, Intel, TSMC, and Samsung are the only manufacturers who are building out 450nm wafers  This will increase yields dramatically  Of course Samsung and TSMC will build ARM out, but it definitely puts quite a bit of pressure on all other manufacturers  As the article mentions Intel and Samsung are the only ones who control production top to bottom, and Samsung must share some of the benefits with ARM 
As someone who has worked in the semiconductor industry for longer than contemporary fanboys have existed, I'm getting a bit fed-up seeing many of these articles which rewrite history with analyses distorted by the lens of the contemporary Apple or Samsung fanboy The mobile industry moved to horizontal integration a long time ago  Better indicators than these odd contemporary obsessions with the relatively non-innovative Samsung and Apple where when Motorola spun out its semiconductor division as Freescale, Nokia stopped making it's own custom designs with TI and ST, and Ericsson spun out it's Ericsson Mobile Platforms division and formed ST-Ericsson with ST The true innovation in the mobile market was done a decade or more ago mainly by Moto/Nokia/Ericsson/TI/Qualcomm, and Samsung and Apple had little to do with it  Under the hood most stuff has been on a simple linear evolutionary path by the SoC providers since then  The phone manufacturers have then mainly been simply sticking these off-the-shelf SoCs (and their included low-level software stacks) in a box, a job made all the easier with the SoC manufacturer collaboration providing the bulk of the work for the AOSP 
Last edited by paul5ra on Wed Feb 13, 2013 11:06 am
introiboad wrote:I am happy to see Kanter here at Ars, I like his writing and he maintains Real World Tech, where Linus Torvalds often shows up to comment on CPU arch and other interesting topics Indeed  Most tech writing in this area is atrocious  This piece is one of the few well informed articles I've read in a long time 
ggeezz wrote:Intel cannot abandon the phone/tablet market  Desktop/laptop sales are stagnating/decreasing and phones/tablets are on the rise  This trend is only going to increase going forward But you're right, they're going to have use their fabs that are a step or two behind the cutting the edge  But they're going to have to up their game in the tablet space to even be able to do that The word you're looking for is Haswell, as far as I know 
Mabsark
ggeezz wrote:Intel cannot abandon the phone/tablet market  Desktop/laptop sales are stagnating/decreasing and phones/tablets are on the rise  This trend is only going to increase going forward But you're right, they're going to have use their fabs that are a step or two behind the cutting the edge  But they're going to have to up their game in the tablet space to even be able to do that Actually, that trend will not simply keep increasing going forward  The reason desktop/laptop sales are stagnating/decreasing is due to the fact that most people already have one and therefore don't need to buy another one  The exact same thing will happen with tablets as well  Sales are increasing now because people without tablets are buying them  When most people already own a tablet, they won't be buying a new one every year and therefore sales will stagnate/decrease The PC market is saturated and in a couple of years, the tablet market will be saturated too  Basically, in order to increase sales in a saturated market, you need to increase the population growth or decrease the longevity of the product 
gypsumfantastic wrote:Why wouldn't the foundries be able close the process gap with Intel? Is it a matter of money? Scale?Probably a mix of a lot of things  One big thing was during this recession, Intel was the ONLY fab company that didn't scale back their R&D  That alone gave Intel a large advantage Intel has almost always been ahead  One of the reasons could be that Intel works with much higher margins than many of the commodity companies like Samsung and TSMC Outside of the P4 flop and some of the monopolistic abuses, Intel has typically been selling to high end customers that are willing to pay a premium for "the best" Intel has a large benefit of having a relatively "good name" when it comes to CPUs, so they can effectively charge a brand-name premium I'm sure there are other reasons, and probably better reasons, but these are the main ones that I think of 
Mabsark wrote:Actually, that trend will not simply keep increasing going forward  The reason desktop/laptop sales are stagnating/decreasing is due to the fact that most people already have one and therefore don't need to buy another one  The exact same thing will happen with tablets as well



ground_truth: The momentum space curl of the interlayer Berry connection polarizability generates the crossed nonlinear dynamical Hall effect.

prompt_front: Now, answer the following question based on the text below, only give me the answer and do not output any other words.

Question: Why does Craig want to find his own place?

Read the following text and answer briefly.

Context 4: '用户指南 * User Guide 02 CN 11 EN * 包装内含 使用前注意事项 快速引导 产品部件详情说明 操作说明 02 02 03 06 08 01 
•本产品支持在系统设置中进行瞳距调节 , 调节时请务必注意，最小瞳距可能会碰触鼻梁。当您佩戴头盔后，您 “显示”中进行手动调节，请注意设置使用不合适的瞳距，可能会引起视觉重影或者眼睛疲劳。 可在“设置” ► •本产品“护眼模式”经德国 TÜV Rheinland 低蓝光认证，通过软件算法降低三色通道中的蓝光量，来达到保护 “护眼” “色彩调节” 眼睛的作用，该模式下画面颜色偏黄，您可根据个人喜好在“设置” 中激活或关闭此功能。 ““显示” ► ► ► 包装内含： VR 头盔 / 手柄 × 2 / 1 5V AA 碱性干电池 × 4/ 眼镜支架 / 遮光鼻托 / 手柄挂绳 × 2 / USB-C 电源适配器 / USB-Cto C 2 0 数据线 / 快速指南 / 用户指南 / 安全与质保指南使用前注意事项 •本产品在开阔的室內环境使用体验最佳，建议至少预留 2×2 米 的空间。使用前请确认身体没有不适且周围环 境安全，特别是佩戴头盔在室内行走移动时，要尽量避免发生意外。 •不建议 12 岁及以下儿童使用本产品，建议将头盔、手柄和配件置于儿童够不到的位置，13 岁以上青少年须在 成人监护下使用，以免发生意外。 •本产品无近视调节功能，近视用户请佩戴眼镜使用并尽量避免近视眼镜被头盔的光学镜片磨伤或刮伤。建议在 使用和收纳时注意防护光学镜片，避免尖锐物体划伤镜片，擦拭清洁时请使用柔软的眼镜布，否则可能划伤镜片， 影响视觉效果。 •长时间使用可能引发轻微的昡晕或者眼疲劳，建议使用 30 分钟后适当休息，可通过眼保健操或观看远处物体缓 解眼疲劳。如果您的身体感到任何不适，请立即停止使用。如果不适持续，请咨询医生。 •当头盔镜片被阳光或紫外线照射时（尤其在户外、阳台、窗台及汽车内存放时），可能导致屏幕出现永久性黄斑。 请尽量避免该情况发生，此种屏幕损坏不在产品的质保范围内。 *本产品最终外观及功能以实物为准，部分地区包装内含物品有所差异，本说明仅供参考。 02 CN
六自由度 VR 体验 本产品可以追踪头盔和手柄前、后、左、右、上、下和旋转的运动状态，您在现实中的肢体运动会实时反映在虚 拟世界中。 由于没有任何线缆的束缚，您在虚拟世界自由探索时请确保游玩区域的安全。 1  建议准备一个整洁安全的体验空间：至少 2×2 米；保持房间明亮，避免在只有单色的墙或大面积玻璃、镜子类 反射物以及许多移动画面和物体的空间中使用。 2  撕下 VR 头盔前端摄像头上的保护膜，并佩戴手柄挂绳。 3  根据开机后的画面提示进行游玩区域的设定。 ❶ 安装电池 按箭头方向拔出电池盖侧边的绝缘纸 快速引导 提示：本产品虚拟的安全区提醒功能，不能完全保证您在设定好的游戏区域中的安全，请时刻注意周围的安全情况。 提示：建议使用 1 5V AA 碱性电池。 按照图示拨动电池盖拨钮打开电池盖更换电池。 03 CN
❷ 手柄开机 ❸ 头盔开机 ❹ 佩戴头盔，调节至清晰舒适的位置 首次开机：拔出绝缘纸，手柄自动开机（蓝灯闪烁） 非首次开机：短按手柄 Home 键开机（蓝灯闪烁） 长按头盔电源键 2 秒（蓝灯常亮） 调节旋钮转动绑带，使后脑垫套在头上，微调绑带长度及佩戴位置至视野清晰 04 提示：近视用户请佩戴眼镜或镜片插件使用，本产品不具备近视调节功能。 CN
❺ 微调顶绑带 微调顶绑带使其受力以减少额头压力 ❻ 瞳 距 调 节 在系统设置：“设置” ► “显示”界面中进行瞳距调节，点击“+”或“-”按钮可微调瞳距直至画面清晰 64mm 请勿 强行 掰动镜 筒，以 免造 成损坏 ！ 请注 意设 置使用 不合适 的瞳 距，可 能 会引起 视 觉重影 或 者眼睛 疲 劳。准 确 的瞳距 设 置有助 于 获得清 晰 的图像 并 减少眼睛 疲劳。 05 CN
产品部件详情说明 头盔状态指示灯 蓝灯常亮：开机进行中或工作状态 黄灯常亮：充电中，电量低于 98% 红灯常亮：充电中，电量低于 20% 绿灯常亮：充电完毕，电量大于 98% 或 充满 蓝灯闪烁：关机进行中 红灯闪烁：电量低于 20% 指示灯熄灭：休眠或关机 06 ① 电源键 开机：长按 2 秒 关机：长按 5 秒 复位：长按 10 秒 开机时，短按休眠 ② ③ ④ ⑤ 状态指示灯 贴脸泡棉 音量键 彩色透视摄像头 使用时请勿遮挡 ⑥ ⑦ ⑧ 顶部绑带 可拆卸 绑带旋钮 环境追踪摄像头 使用时请勿遮挡 ⑨ ⑩ ⑪ USB-C 接口 左 / 右喇叭 距离传感器 佩戴头盔后，系统自动唤醒 摘下头盔后，系统自动休眠 ⑫ ⑬ 眼球追踪摄像头 此功能仅 Pro 版支持 使用时请勿遮挡 面部追踪摄像头 此功能仅 Pro 版支持 使用时请勿遮挡 CN
手柄状态指示灯 熄灭：已连接或者关机 蓝灯常亮：固件升级模式 蓝灯闪烁：连接中 红蓝灯交替慢速闪烁：等待配对 ① ② 摇杆 菜单键 ③ Home 键 开机 : 短按关机 : 长按 6 秒退出应用 : 短按屏幕中心校正 : 长按 1 秒④ ⑤ ⑥ ⑦ 状态指示灯 抓握键 截屏键 扳机键 ⑧ ⑨ 电池盒 打开：拨动拨钮，电池盒弹出 安装：按压直至自动锁紧 追踪光环 使用时请勿遮挡 注：手柄挂绳可按图示将粗绳穿过细绳并锁紧在手柄尾端 07 CN
手柄硬件复位 如果手柄出现按 Home 键和任何按键均无反应或者头盔中虚拟手柄卡死不动的问题可拆装电池重新启动手柄。 近视用户配戴 本设备不具备近视调节功能，头盔可支持佩戴镜框宽度小于 150mm 的大多数标准眼镜。 操作说明 头控模式 未连接手柄的情况下，您可通过转动头部光标及点击头盔音量加减按键进行操作。 切换主控手柄射线 在主控菜单下，短按对应手柄的扳机键可以切换主控手柄的射线。 屏幕中心校正 戴着头盔直视前方，按住手柄 Home 键（或头控模式下头盔上的音量减键）1 秒以上，进行屏幕中心的校正将菜 单拉到当前视野朝向位置。 断开手柄 长按手柄 Home 键直至手柄状态指示灯红灯亮起并伴随振动产生时即可松手，此时手柄关机并断开与头盔的连接。 您无需刻意进行手柄关机操作，在以下状态下手柄会自动关机省电： •头盔进入深度休眠时（摘下头盔后一段时间） •头盔手柄管理界面解绑手柄时 •头盔关机时 添加新手柄 如需添加新手柄（头盔最多可同时连接一对手柄，即左右手柄各一只），或解绑手柄后再次连接 , 可进入“设置” “手 柄”，点击“配对”，同时按住手柄 Home 键和扳机键直至手柄状态指示灯红蓝交替闪烁时即可松开，然后根据 头盔画面提示操作。 ► 休眠 / 唤醒 方式一：摘下头盔一段时间后，系统自动休眠；戴上头盔时，系统自动唤醒。 方式二：短按头盔电源键也可以进行休眠或唤醒操作。 硬件复位 头盔硬件复位 如果头盔出现短按头盔电源键没有反应或头盔的画面卡死等问题，可以长按头盔电源键 10 秒以上重新启动头盔。 08 CN
安装眼镜支架 安装遮光鼻托 如您存在眼镜摩擦光学镜片或者压迫鼻梁的问题，请按照图示安装眼镜支架以增加间隔空间。 您可根据佩戴的舒适度选择是否安装。 如您感觉鼻子处漏光影响体验，请按照图示安装遮光鼻托配件。 由于眼睛空间密闭可能加剧起雾及出汗问题，您可根据喜好选择是否安装。 ❶ 摘下贴脸泡棉 ❷ 将眼镜支架按照图示安装在产品上 ❸ 将贴脸泡棉按照图示安装眼镜支架上 ❶ 摘下贴脸泡棉 ❸ 安装贴脸泡棉❷ 将遮光鼻托按照图示方式安装在贴脸泡棉上 注：按照图示拆卸眼镜支架 09 CN
更换贴脸泡棉 贴脸泡棉多次清洁和长时间使用后会变色和质地变软，您可酌情更换新泡棉。 更换顶绑带 摘下贴脸泡棉 ❸ 安装贴脸泡棉 按照图示捏住顶绑带金属扣，往下压到底然后抽出 ❷ •购买优质热门应用 •畅 聊 社 区， 与 众 多 PICO 玩 家 一起探索 VR 世界 •管理设备更便捷 •参与丰富互动活动 •更多精彩内容等你来发现 ❶ 微 信公 众 号：PICO VR抖音：PICO官 方 旗 舰 店哔 哩 哔 哩：PICO-VR官 方微 博：PICO-VR ❶ ❷ 10 CN
In The Box: VR Headset / 2 Controllers / 4 1 5V AA Alkaline Batteries / Glasses Spacer / Nose Pad / 2 Controller Lan- yards / USB-C Power Adapter / USB-C to C 2 0 Data Cable / Quick Guide / User Guide / Safety and WarrantyGuide Important Health & Safety Notes • This product is designed and intended to be used in an open and safe indoor area, free of anytripping or slipping hazards  To avoid accidents, remain conscious to the potential confines ofyour physical area and respect the boundary of your virtual area whenever you see it  Be sure towear the lanyards when using the Controllers  Make sure that there is enough space around yourhead and body (at least 2 meters by 2 meters) to stretch your arms to avoid damage or injury toyourself, others, and your surroundings  • This product is not recommended for children aged 12 and under  It is recommended to keep headsets,controllers and accessories out of the reach of children  Teenagers aged 13 and over must use it underadult supervision to avoid accidents  • This product is designed to accommodate most prescription glasses  Make sure to wear the VR Headsetin a manner in which the VR Headset lenses do not rub or impair your prescription lenses  • Prolonged use may cause dizziness or eye fatigue  It is recommended to take a break every 30 minutes Try relieving your eyestrain by looking at distant objects  If you feel any discomfort, stop using the prod- uct immediately  If the discomfort persists, seek medical advice • Do not expose the optical lenses to direct sunlight or other strong light sources  Exposure to directsunlight may cause permanent yellow spot damage on the screen  Screen damage caused by sunlightexposure or other strong sources of light is not covered by the warranty  • This product supports interpupillary distance (IPD) adjustment in system settings  When adjusting,please be aware that with the minimum IPD, it may touch the bridge of the nose  You can adjust the IPDaccording to your actual interpupillary distance in "Settings"►"Display"  Please note that using inap- propriate IPD may increase the risk of discomfort  • This product has an “Eye Protection Mode”, certified by TÜV Rheinland (Germany), which can protectyour eyes by reducing blue light in the three color channels using software algorithms  The screen ap- pears yellowish in this mode and you can turn this feature on/off in "Settings"►"Display"►"Color"►“- Eye Protection”  • Protect optical lenses during use and storage to prevent damage, such as scratches or exposure tostrong light or direct sunlight  * Product and packaging are updated regularly, and the functions and contents of the standalone headset may be upgraded in the future Therefore, the content, appearance and functionality listed in this manual and product packaging are subject to change and may notreflect the final product  These instructions are for reference only  * Carefully read this user guide before using the product and share this information with any other users, as it contains important safetyinformation  Keep the user guide as reference for the future  11 EN
6 Degrees of Freedom VR The device can track your translational and rotational movements in all directions (up/down, left/right,forward/backward, pitch, roll, and yaw)  Your movements in the real world will be captured and translatedto what you see in the virtual world when using the appropriate content  Ensure a safe environment before you start your VR experience  1  Clear a safe indoor area of at least 2 meters by 2 meters  Keep the room bright, avoid spaces with main- ly single-colored walls, glass, mirrors, moving pictures or other similar objects  2  Remove the protective film that covers the headset front cameras  Wear the lanyards connected to theControllers  3  Set up your environment by following instructions on the VR Headset screen  Install Batteries ❶Pull the tab to remove the insulating paper  Quick Guide 2 m 2m This product can not guarantee your safety with guardian system, you will need to always pay attention to the surrounding safety  * Note: 1 5V AA alkaline batteries should be used



ground_truth: Because his roommate smokes.

prompt_front: Now, answer the following question based on the text below, only give me the answer and do not output any other words.

Question: How are smartphones and tablets different from a technical perspective?

Read the following text and answer briefly.

Context 3:  Sales are increasing now because people without tablets are buying them  When most people already own a tablet, they won't be buying a new one every year and therefore sales will stagnate/decrease The PC market is saturated and in a couple of years, the tablet market will be saturated too  Basically, in order to increase sales in a saturated market, you need to increase the population growth or decrease the longevity of the product That's true as long as most people are still buying both a tablet and a laptop when each needs to be replaced  I think the assumption is that, as you say, the tablet market will saturate, with people just replacing existing ones, but the desktop/laptop market could decrease much farther than that, if most people stop replacing them at all  I'm not sure of the likelihood of that, but I think that's where this idea comes from 
ggeezz wrote:Intel cannot abandon the phone/tablet market  Desktop/laptop sales are stagnating/decreasing and phones/tablets are on the rise  This trend is only going to increase going forward But you're right, they're going to have use their fabs that are a step or two behind the cutting the edge  But they're going to have to up their game in the tablet space to even be able to do that The upcoming Haswell chip is showing to consume 1/3 the power of IvyBridge at peak, consumes 1/20th the power at idle, all the while maintaining Identical or better performance This chip should actually compete with ARM CPUs on both power/performance and idle I am expecting a large war 
Apple once again is dictating the performance in the mobile industry  Nice to see others being able to keep the pace, as well 
paul5ra wrote:As someone who has worked in the semiconductor industry for longer than contemporary fanboys have existed, I'm getting a bit fed-up seeing many of these articles which rewrite history with analyses distorted by the lens of the contemporary Apple or Samsung fanboy The mobile industry moved to horizontal integration a long time ago  Better indicators than these odd contemporary obsessions with the relatively non-innovative Samsung and Apple where when Motorola spun out its semiconductor division as Freescale, Nokia stopped making it's own custom designs with TI and ST, and Ericsson spun out it's Ericsson Mobile Platforms division and formed ST-Ericsson with ST The true innovation in the mobile market was done a decade or more ago mainly by Moto/Nokia/Ericsson/TI/Qualcomm, and Samsung and Apple had little to do with it  Under the hood most stuff has been on a simple evolutionary path by the SoC providers since then Yeah, and most of the innovation in the automobile industry came about before Henry Ford came into the business  Doesn't change the fact that cars would probably have been an asterisk in the history books under "toys for rich people" if it weren't for him The same applies to to mobile computing for Apple, Samsung, et al 
SheldonRoss wrote:Lagrange wrote:The question for the future is how the economics will stack up when overall device costs fall significantly and there is a big downward pressure on SoC prices  In that situation, can Intel still justify bringing their A-game to a market where products are essentially commoditised and you have processors selling for a only a few dollars each?The lesson from their previous involvement in the DRAM market is that they probably won't want to be involved because there isn't enough money to be made to justify manufacturing phone SoCs on a cutting edge, or near cutting edge process  In that scenario, Intel may not totally abandon the market but they might just stick to manufacturing SoCs on nodes that are a step or two behind the state of the art I think the processing is a bigger advantage than many realize  If Intel can stay ahead in process design - which this article seems to indicate - they should have a major advantage  All else being equal a 14nm chip should be significantly faster and more efficient than the same chip at 22nm  Add in the fact that yields increase geometrically - you can fit a lot more 14nm chips on a given wafer size vs 22nm (or 32nm for the other manufacturers ) and you have a very appealing proposition  And then add in the fact that Intel actually has a pretty good graphics stack and IP  My point was that Intel might have a one or two process advantage over the rest of the industry at the cutting edge but that doesn't mean that they can afford to manufacture on those processes for very low margin parts  If the SoC market becomes increasingly commoditised, there isn't going to be the money to justify making them in a state of the art fab Remember that one of the big selling points of Itanium was that it would make use of process advantages that were effectively paid for by the mainstream x86 market  That didn't quite work out in practice and Itanium processors were often well behind Xeons in process technology 
paul5ra wrote:As someone who has worked in the semiconductor industry for longer than contemporary fanboys have existed, I'm getting a bit fed-up seeing many of these articles which rewrite history with analyses distorted by the lens of the contemporary Apple or Samsung fanboy The mobile industry moved to horizontal integration a long time ago  Better indicators than these odd contemporary obsessions with the relatively non-innovative Samsung and Apple where when Motorola spun out its semiconductor division as Freescale, Nokia stopped making it's own custom designs with TI and ST, and Ericsson spun out it's Ericsson Mobile Platforms division and formed ST-Ericsson with ST The true innovation in the mobile market was done a decade or more ago mainly by Moto/Nokia/Ericsson/TI/Qualcomm, and Samsung and Apple had little to do with it  Under the hood most stuff has been on a simple linear evolutionary path by the SoC providers since then  The phone manufacturers have then mainly been simply sticking these off-the-shelf SoCs (and their included low-level software stacks) in a box, a job made all the easier with the SoC manufacturer collaboration providing the bulk of the work for the AOSP Just goes to show that people who have worked in an industry for a long time don't always understand what that industry is doing You haven't been working in it long enough to seem to know that it was Acorn and Apple that invented the mobile ARM CPU in the first place  All those companies you've mentioned have just been working off Acorn and Apple's pioneering work  Now, Apple is back at it again, very successfully, and all the companies you mentioned that produce chips with ARM IP in them are licensing them from the company Acorn and Apple formed—ARM 
Last edited by melgross on Wed Feb 13, 2013 11:13 am
Mark Havel wrote:ggeezz wrote:Intel cannot abandon the phone/tablet market  Desktop/laptop sales are stagnating/decreasing and phones/tablets are on the rise  This trend is only going to increase going forward But you're right, they're going to have use their fabs that are a step or two behind the cutting the edge  But they're going to have to up their game in the tablet space to even be able to do that The word you're looking for is Haswell, as far as I know If tablets move into the $100-200 range, is there going to be room for Haswell?So long as there is a higher-end tablet market, then Haswell will be able to shine, but it's going to be a much more powerful and costly part than the sort of ARM based hardware that often runs tablets  If we see a race to the bottom where price is the dominant motivator behind purchases, then a high performance SoC will struggle to make its mark 
melgross wrote:paul5ra wrote:As someone who has worked in the semiconductor industry for longer than contemporary fanboys have existed, I'm getting a bit fed-up seeing many of these articles which rewrite history with analyses distorted by the lens of the contemporary Apple or Samsung fanboy The mobile industry moved to horizontal integration a long time ago  Better indicators than these odd contemporary obsessions with the relatively non-innovative Samsung and Apple where when Motorola spun out its semiconductor division as Freescale, Nokia stopped making it's own custom designs with TI and ST, and Ericsson spun out it's Ericsson Mobile Platforms division and formed ST-Ericsson with ST The true innovation in the mobile market was done a decade or more ago mainly by Moto/Nokia/Ericsson/TI/Qualcomm, and Samsung and Apple had little to do with it  Under the hood most stuff has been on a simple linear evolutionary path by the SoC providers since then  The phone manufacturers have then mainly been simply sticking these off-the-shelf SoCs (and their included low-level software stacks) in a box, a job made all the easier with the SoC manufacturer collaboration providing the bulk of the work for the AOSP Just goes to show that people who have worked in an industry for a long time don't always understand what that industry is doing You haven't been working in it long enough to seem to know that it was Acorn and Apple that invented the mobile ARM CPU in the first place  All those companies you've mentioned have just been working off Acorn and Apple's pioneering work  Now, Apple is back at it again, very successfully, and all the companies you mentioned that produce chips with ARM IP in them are licensing them from the company Acorn and Apple formed—ARM Of course I realise ARM IP has indeed been a major driving factor too (though only one if several architectures before ARM became dominant), though I see ARM's influence on the mobile industry as having nothing to do with modern day Apple and only one small piece of the puzzle  My point is that the hard electrical engineering, mathematics, DSP, semiconductor physics/chemistry, RF engineering, analogue design, CAD etc  that make modern telecommunications possible has very little to do with the fashion companies who consumers (and unfortunately much of the tech media) associate with it and give the credit (though in this respect Samsung does deserve a bit more credit for their work on NAND flash and displays)  The industry simply would not exist TODAY without the overwhelming horizontal integration that already dominates 
Quote:In the long term, mobile devices are likely to evolve similarly to the PC and favor a horizontal business model  The real advantage is one of flexibility; as costs drop and the market expands, it will be increasingly necessary for vendors like HTC to offer a wide range of phones based on radically different SoCs  You don't mention in the article that each SoC necessarily requires a bit of parallel dev work unlike the PC  In the PC world there is a standard BIOS and HW architecture that allows for pluggable designs  On a highly integrated SoC this is untrue  HTC suffers because it has to support radically different SoCs, their drivers and boot loaders, etc  Quote:While a vertically integrated company like Apple can focus and maintain leadership in a specific (and highly lucrative) niche, it would be very difficult to expand in many growing areas of the market  The differences between an iPhone 6 and a $20 feature phone are tremendous and would be very difficult for a single company to bridge It's only difficult because Apple chooses to ignore that market, not because they can't  If they can release a $99 Apple TV, they can surely cobble together a $20 feature phone if they chose to eschew 8GB of NAND, BT, WiFi, a specialized dock connector, LTE, and their specialized processors  In other words, build the equivalent of an iPod shuffle with a horrible screen and no OS to speak of 
paul5ra wrote:melgross wrote:paul5ra wrote:As someone who has worked in the semiconductor industry for longer than contemporary fanboys have existed, I'm getting a bit fed-up seeing many of these articles which rewrite history with analyses distorted by the lens of the contemporary Apple or Samsung fanboy The mobile industry moved to horizontal integration a long time ago  Better indicators than these odd contemporary obsessions with the relatively non-innovative Samsung and Apple where when Motorola spun out its semiconductor division as Freescale, Nokia stopped making it's own custom designs with TI and ST, and Ericsson spun out it's Ericsson Mobile Platforms division and formed ST-Ericsson with ST The true innovation in the mobile market was done a decade or more ago mainly by Moto/Nokia/Ericsson/TI/Qualcomm, and Samsung and Apple had little to do with it  Under the hood most stuff has been on a simple linear evolutionary path by the SoC providers since then  The phone manufacturers have then mainly been simply sticking these off-the-shelf SoCs (and their included low-level software stacks) in a box, a job made all the easier with the SoC manufacturer collaboration providing the bulk of the work for the AOSP Just goes to show that people who have worked in an industry for a long time don't always understand what that industry is doing You haven't been working in it long enough to seem to know that it was Acorn and Apple that invented the mobile ARM CPU in the first place  All those companies you've mentioned have just been working off Acorn and Apple's pioneering work  Now, Apple is back at it again, very successfully, and all the companies you mentioned that produce chips with ARM IP in them are licensing them from the company Acorn and Apple formed—ARM Of course I realise ARM IP has indeed been a major driving factor too (though only one if several architectures before ARM became dominant), though I see ARM's influence on the mobile industry as having nothing to do with modern day Apple and only one piece of the puzzle  My point is that the hard electrical engineering, mathematics, DSP, semiconductor physics/chemistry, RF engineering, analogue design,etc  that make modern telecommunications possible has very little to do with the fashion companies who consumers (and unfortunately much of the tech media) associate with it and give the credit (though in this respect Samsung does deserve a bit more credit for their work on NAND flash and displays)  The industry simply would not exist TODAY without the overwhelming horizontal integration that already dominates Yes the efforts of these companies getting cellular communications standardized were immense  And the technology matured  And then they didn't do much with it  It took some youngin's to look at the problem fresh and add the UI that make today's smartphones work  As we have all seen, the moment your technology has matured is the moment you are screwed because someone else now has the opportunity to look at it as a black box and make something new  Each of those manufacturers knew that smartphones would eventually be awesome, but none of them had the UI and software design to make a truly breakout product  Imagine if Motorola would have been smart enough to buy the Android guys instead of Google  Instead, Google bought a bunch of patents on that cellular black box to try to defend it's platform And when you think about it, which consumes more man years of engineering effort per year at this point     iterating that cellular black box or developing the OS, services and apps that power today's smartphones?
Intel had better decide that they are competing in this space "for real", or they are screwed  They've already let the Atom languish for five years, during which ARM has completely caught up in performance Just like Tim Cook said, if you don't cannibalize your own markets someone else will do it for you Whether Intel will embrace that concept in time remains to be seen  Personally, I hope they don't; if Intel transforms into a chipless Fab company (like TSMC) everyone benefits 
I still think Samsung has the advantage long term because they have both the SOC and the memory products  As mentioned in the article, TSV's (Through Silicon Via's) are going to be quite a disruption  Today, people normally stack an LPDDR2 package on top of their SOC package (POP or Package On Package)  Within the LPDDR2 package, you could have a stack of DRAM die typically with wire bonding connecting the die within the package Once you more to TSV's, you can have a LOT more connections between the SOC and its DRAM's  While this is being standardized through JEDEC (http://www jedec org/category/technolog     a/3d-ics-0), Samsung has all the pieces in house to do whatever they want  You could see a 512 bit or higher bus from the SOC to the memory  The trick is that the memory and the SOC need to line up with each other when you stack them  This gives Samsung an inherent advantage This isn't just going to impact mobile either  Take a look at that JEDEC link  It also lists High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)  This is a 1024 bit bus that provides 128GBytes/s to 256GBytes/s of bandwidth to a stack of up to 8 DRAM's  Here is your processor that includes 8-16 cores and 4GBytes of really, really, fast DRAM    No DIMMs required  How many of them do you want in your server rack?If I was Intel or Apple, I would be thinking seriously about making some investments in Micron to guarantee they make some compelling DRAM's to integrate with their SOC's and processors    otherwise Samsung is going to blow them out of the water on bandwidth 
Great_Scott wrote:Intel had better decide that they are competing in this space "for real", or they are screwed  They've already let the Atom languish for five years, during which ARM has completely caught up in performance Just like Tim Cook said, if you don't cannibalize your own markets someone else will do it for you Whether Intel will embrace that concept in time remains to be seen  Personally, I hope they don't; if Intel transforms into a chipless Fab company (like TSMC) everyone benefits It's true that Atom has stood still for too long, but honestly it's pretty amazing how Atom is still competitive with current ARM chips  The Z2760 is even 32nm vs 28nm of the latest Krait and A15 chips But that's all changing with Atom moving to the tick tock schedule this year  It wouldn't even surprise me to see Apple move to Intel chips for IOS And I don't see how Intel moving to a chipless Fab company would help everyone  It certainly wouldn't help Intel 
Mabsark wrote:ggeezz wrote:Intel cannot abandon the phone/tablet market  Desktop/laptop sales are stagnating/decreasing and phones/tablets are on the rise  This trend is only going to increase going forward But you're right, they're going to have use their fabs that are a step or two behind the cutting the edge  But they're going to have to up their game in the tablet space to even be able to do that Actually, that trend will not simply keep increasing going forward  The reason desktop/laptop sales are stagnating/decreasing is due to the fact that most people already have one and therefore don't need to buy another one  The exact same thing will happen with tablets as well  Sales are increasing now because people without tablets are buying them  When most people already own a tablet, they won't be buying a new one every year and therefore sales will stagnate/decrease The PC market is saturated and in a couple of years, the tablet market will be saturated too  Basically, in order to increase sales in a saturated market, you need to increase the population growth or decrease the longevity of the product Yes and no  I'm not sure the tablet market will saturate in a "couple of years " It may be more like 5 years  But that's a quibble Here's the real issue  Right now Apple wants you to own an iPhone AND iPad AND Macbook AND iWatch AND Apple TV  Microsoft, OTOH, is making the Surface so that you could ditch your laptop and just use a Surface  Not everyone, but some people If 5 years from now, we're in a world where a significant number of people use a Surface-type device instead of a laptop, then the PC market is going to contract significantly  Maybe some of the tablet-like devices will use moderately expensive Intel chips, but some of them are going to use cheaper chips 
GravyGraphics wrote:I still think Samsung has the advantage long term because they have both the SOC and the memory products  As mentioned in the article, TSV's (Through Silicon Via's) are going to be quite a disruption  Today, people normally stack an LPDDR2 package on top of their SOC package (POP or Package On Package)  Within the LPDDR2 package, you could have a stack of DRAM die typically with wire bonding connecting the die within the package Once you more to TSV's, you can have a LOT more connections between the SOC and its DRAM's  While this is being standardized through JEDEC (http://www jedec org/category/technolog     a/3d-ics-0), Samsung has all the pieces in house to do whatever they want  You could see a 512 bit or higher bus from the SOC to the memory  The trick is that the memory and the SOC need to line up with each other when you stack them  This gives Samsung an inherent advantage This isn't just going to impact mobile either  Take a look at that JEDEC link  It also lists High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)  This is a 1024 bit bus that provides 128GBytes/s to 256GBytes/s of bandwidth to a stack of up to 8 DRAM's  Here is your processor that includes 8-16 cores and 4GBytes of really, really, fast DRAM    No DIMMs required  How many of them do you want in your server rack?If I was Intel or Apple, I would be thinking seriously about making some investments in Micron to guarantee they make some compelling DRAM's to integrate with their SOC's and processors    otherwise Samsung is going to blow them out of the water on bandwidth Why not AMD? Last I checked they still made memory   and processors/GPUs 



ground_truth: Smartphones are more compact and power constrained.