[PAGE 1]
sUaJEcT: Attached

1. Nr, called at 11:00 A.H, 20 January in connaction with the attachei docurent. He statei that the document was not delayed in reaching ths Security Office but had been routed wrongly, ant he had sent the docunent to yessmrfor study and concurrence if Security approved the operation. stated that TSS had approved and that the Officer to Five the P-l ras familiar with its use and had worked with the technicue in Europe. Eo stated he would call tha Medics and he was certain that their approval would be forthcoming. Ee stated he thought he could save time and a comittee meeting by sending the paper around for concurrence or disapproval and requested that we act on same. He stated that the case was an old one, that eyerything as far as he could tell was -in ordsr and that approval would be needed in the Field by 1 February.

2.Exanination by -the writer reflects that for a F-l interrogation, there is sufficient inforuation in the attached tc recomnend approval provided, of course, the usual Security'presautions are taken as to control of Subject, phvsical surroundings, and Subject's health. It is the writer's belief, however, that ws should ascertain specifically if this is to be a true P-l interrogation; that is by use of LSD. If a P-l interrogation is to include other types of procedures used in the Artichoke Operations, further study is recomnenda including a specific that in either case niedical'authority will be present during the operation.

58.2

430