[PAGE 1]
15 November 1954

FROM: Chief, Nodical Branch

2 1. lbdified ARTIChokr type interrogation was done on the above subject. Decause of the difficulty encountered in injecting the material into tho ara veins, the techriquo was nocossarily somowhat modified since ve vere uable to maintain continuous irjection of material. Chs subject was siven a total of l7 cs of 2h% solution in approximately the first one-hnlf hour of the procodure. Imneuiately thereafter vas the most productive period of quostioning. Diring that period I consider the subiect to have been least inhibited, and his rosistanco to answerirg quostions trutifully at its lowest.

2. There vas no succoss in establishing true fantasy state in this individual, but more or loss direct intorrogeticn was resorted to. Conclusions fron a zedical standpoint: This vas not a satisfactery procedure technically. Hovever, I do feel that durirg the first 15 ninutes to 1 hour of questioning at the onset of the procodure the individual answered in a truthful manner questions comerning sonsitive areas in his background which had been brought under suspicien during the course of polygraph procedure. Fron that stanipoint i would consider that the procedure has been a useful adjunct in resolvins this difficult case.

NOV 17 133A

2