[PAGE 1]
escribed a recent contact with

C. THE ADIINISTRATION OF TIE PROJECT

1. raised the question ofin talking about the substance of the project with professional friends. promised to develop one if desirable. \*.

2.estated he would like to establish an open list of cleared consultants so that he could have present at any meeting only those vith a significant interest or contribution.

3. As phases of the project might require the advice of higily specialized persons, consideration was given to the possibility of having certain confercnces set up on a one-time basis.

h. epmsesa'agreed to make the necossary arrangements for the panel members to observe an interrogation when appropriate.

5. lo conpletion dates for project should be stated until the complete project outlinc has been prepared.

D.. SUGGESTED SPEOLFIC PROJECTS FOR TRE SUPPORT STAFF

1. Collection of substantive references for evaluation.by the panel in the delineation of areas of firm knowledge. \*

2. Preparation of a chart in which the situations likely to be faced by an individual were plotted against the kmnowm defense. (Conditions to be specified byarv

E. SUGGESTED AREAS OF IMGEDIATE ACTIVITY

1. A studr of the anenability of the individual and the detection of an "amenable type.""

2. A thorough study ol interrogation. "

3. án evaluation of Uhe part whiich instriwnents can plan in such a program.

F. CONCLUSIOH

l.:As the discussion tirew to a close, consideration was Riven to the, degree of success that could be attaincd', With respect to the

b. Byr the Defector Center in

[PAGE 2]
dofensive aspect, tho panel can makr a definite contribution if an improvement is made in existing methols of resisting disclosure. With respect to the offensive aspect of eliciting information, a study of carefully selected areas of present information and properly designed research projects till enable us to develop better techniques.

2. In conclusion, restated three questions which A the panel will find useful in guiding their discussion:

a. Mhat subject matter requires further evaluation?

.,. b. ilio is the best man to evaluate present knowledge?

c. What research projects will furnish us with needed informationt

3. erstatod that he would call a mectingof the panel A within the next week. The meeting adjourned at l630 hours.

3