[PAGE 1]
Sct out below are a suries of questions that. arore from .time to tim: as the work progressed and were jotted doan by tho writer as being vertinent to the operation and any subsequent activities that might follow lhe operation. These questions are merely set down to assist in tho analysis of the work and what had gone into the preparation of this trip ry and / his'Assistant. The notes were not written at one time, but over a number of days and are in no order whatsoever:

a. referred to quinine or quinine sulphate 8/ as a subsLance used to makc coffee bitter. This should he checked out to dotermine whether or not this is a fact.

2. what were the oxact dosages used and how weru thoy arrived at? a-

3. If the dosages were not a liquid, what was the anount of the sterile water used?' Why?.

h. Are the prenarations straight comnercial products?

5. Why were the preparations so often usod in conhination ant then again only one at a time? In short, why couldn't thoy have all heen used tosether?

6. Why couldn't a proparation he prepared using all thrne?

COIGI DPAF

A/B, 2, 33/16

[PAGE 2]
7. Why was not the Artichoke Team briefedi, particularly in technical details, of the sffects of the drurs prior to their use so that the Artichoke Team could, by obscryation and monitoring, judge tho eflects? Aithourh stated the drugs had an euphoric effeet, and had a tendency to made the subject relax, the terminology was so loose and general that. judging was impossible.

8. Did eep statistics on the students that he Lested? if so, where are the statistics, details?

9. How many students were actually used in the tests?

a. To what extent was sed? To what extent did participate personally?

B/6

10. what controls were used? Detalls.

1l. Were students ewer cross-checked on polyrraph?

12. Why were tand theawritan.excluded from the conference A deliberateiy whilo was askod in?

13. Who is drug/chemicnl man at B/6 a. What sort of a staff does he have? b. Exactly what doesdo?

1h. why didnit take the drug/chemical specialist instcad of on these tests?

15. Has B3 work?

a. It is ossential that we see the investigation on

16. Why did ! snon ud ing Details of this are F necessarv since her arrivnlmignt be a stroni security hazard. () R/

17. why were we told that! Anad to be in Fby tho 9th of September at the latost, yot in the final conference denied this.

18. What is the gossip B16
-2- 2

ROUGH DHATT

[PAGE 3]
a. What is marital status and is she practicins B/ at being married?

19. If the drugs used in the tests were standard, why weren't: we told at 'once?

20. What are the offects of liquid and food in conmction with the drugs?

a. Is the drug more or less effectivo before or after large quantities of food or large quantities of .. liquid, otc., etc.? tr7

21. what are the efrects of fatirue on the subjcctsin connection with the drugs? Specifically, why didn't know the exact dosages to bc used instead of continualiy asking and such is the'proper dose?

22. Why was-a pleasant atmgspherc essential to his work? 7 F ht madt a trip d suoula hbe oren o il dy th that mtit or the work would not te coniucted in a pleasant atmosphere.

23. How can any substances be called surreptims if a subject gets dirunk when using it?

2h. Was quinine or a bitter substance actually ever used? (Glose (check this with

b25. Ifase dets in trouble such is a divorce, how can we smothinr this trip? What would theoo in the event of a scandal B/3 or possible suicide?

26. Hasever run an audit one If not, why not? B/3
27. Why did Cohviously keev us away from at B/6

2月. Who Proposud the name or . formerly with this Ageney. (Accessmont Croup) to to to end consult withese in connection with Artichoke? Doe: know him ordoes he know

ROUGH DRAFT

3.

[PAGE 4]
1 29. were written tests" ever tried on Ins subjccts, exporimontally .or otherwise, in the use of thoae drungs:

30. were psychiatric tests ever tried in this connection?

31. Was hypnosis ever used inconnection with these drugs? If so, what werc ihe results?

32. Has ever used hypnosis on (Someone should arranre a very discrect interview wit in connection with this whole project on the"basis of' testimony ascortained in. F

33. Why did eave so suddenly? B6

3h. Nhat wer the largest dosages ever given experimentally or othcrwise? Pesults.

35. How come these Ha substances are called non-toxic?

36. What is the antidote for each? Why did. sy say there was no antidole?

37.Why taken in on the first caze by (in such mattors, it should be a standard tile ..c. that, any Agency nersonnel shoald be briefod by our own people bofore being appronched by outsiders, particularly in connection vith experimantal programs.)

38. Were thore ever any actual changes in the stories of the subjects? Were any significant detalis produced? Were there any positiv detnils, admissions or confossions made, . etc., eto.? (In this connection, the writer foels that brief reports by the case-officers would probahly be of value in the accessment of uhis type of research.)

39. while the writer was able only to physically observe reactions in the first two cases and, in part, cover by monitoring, the last Lhree cases, the writer noticed no outstanding or clearcut examples of good feeling being èstablished on tue part, of the subjoct or any real euphoria on the part of the subject., etc.

Lo. would drawing picturea (along the Linea ploys) A revcal anything before and after dosagds?

a. Wore drawing togts or tests of a sixilar nature B 3 used at

-L

ROUGI DRAT

[PAGE 5]
b. dere the Porschach test ever used a;

hl. How could you possibly administer these drues with vry tough and very inteiligent individual, particulariy if he refused to have a drink of any  liquid while taiking with you?

always talked about special. signs and indica-42. tions thit would he noticeable when the drugs were taking effect. The writer xould like to know just whatwere those signs that B6 would notice and that another inlividual ank wonid not, or more spccifically a doctor or a competent interrogator couldn't nolice.

43. Specifically what did these things do that whisky, beer, vodka, gin wouldn't?

.Lh. Can it be said that in any way except negative, the test was successful?

b5. If, after two years of research and hundreds of thousands of dollars spent and the only substance developed are standard compounds such as the barhiturates, could we make how a case 1 of fraud?

mistress or is having an affair with him hć. 10 or is actually in love with him or if the reverse is rya true, how can she it possibly bo stated that she would be an impartial observer?

à7. In the critical opinion of the writer, the subst ancosunãer no circumstances should be or should have heen turned over to anyonc overseas. They should have been destroyed befoe returning to the U.S. This should be checked out hy the proper people to see whether or not this was done.

20

-5-

ROUGH DRAET

B/3