MORI 190880

[PAGE 1]
Set out below are a suries of questions that. aro:e from.time to tim?: as the work progressed and were jotted down hy tho writer as being pertinent to the operation and any subsequcnt activities that might follow the operation. These questions are meroly .set down to assist in the analysis of the work and what had gone into the preparation of this trip ry and H his'Assistant. The notes were not written at one time, but over a mumher of days and are in no order whatsoever:

l. What, specifically, are "L", "G", and ""? a. referred to quinine or quinine sulphate 8/6 as a substance used to make coffee hittor. This should be checked out to dotermine whether or not this is a fact.

2. vhat were the cxact dosages used and how were they arrived at? a.

3. If the dosages were not a liquid, whal was the anount of' the sterile water used? Why?

h. Are the prenarations straight comiercial products?

5. Why were the preparations so often usod in conbination ant then again only one at a time? In short, why couldn't they have all heen used together?

6. Thy couldn't a proparation be prepared using, all thrce?

EOUGH DPAE

A/B, 2, 33/16

[PAGE 2]
7. Why was not the Artichoke Team briefed, particularly in technical details, of the effocts of the drugs prior to their use so that the Artichoke Team could, by ohscrya stated the drugs had an euphoric effect and had a ten- tion and monitoring, judge the effects? Aithour;hy B dency to made the subject relax, the terminology was so loose and general that judging was impossible.

8. Did eep statistics on the students that he testod? If so, where are the statistics, details?

9. How many students were actually used in the tests? B/6 a. To what extent was used? To what. extent did participate personally?

10. What controls were used? Details.

1l. Were students ewer cross-checked on polygraph?

12. Why were and theawriter.excluded from the conference A deliberately whil? S was askod in?

13. Who is drug/chemical man at B/6 a. What sort of a staff does he have? .b. Exactly what doesdo?

Il. Why didn't. take the drug/chemical specialist, instead B/6 of on these tests?

15. Has run a full check, investigation, and audit in the 7L H+-B/3 work?

16. Why did show up in Petails of this are F necessary since her arrival'might be a stronf, security hazard. (0) n1

17. Why were we told that had to be in bythe 9th of September at the latest, yet, in the final conference denied this.

18. What is the gossip B16 -2-

[PAGE 3]
a. What is marital status and is she practicins B/6 at being married?

19. If the drugs used in the tests were standard, why weren't: we told at 'once?

20. What, are the cffects of liquid and food in connoction with the drugs?

a. Is the drug more or less effectivo before or after large quantities of food or large quantities of 11.1 liquid, etc., etc.?

2l. What are the effects of fatigue on the subjects in connection with the drugs?Specifically, why didn't wwknow the exact dosages to be used instead of continually asking and such is the'proper dose?

22. Why was-a pleasant atmosphere essential to his work? F had made a trip th Ibefore to study the situation at first hand and snould have been well aware that most of the work would not be conducted in a pleasant atmosphere.

23. How can any substances be called surreptilhus if a subject gets drunk when using it?

24. Was qulnine or a bitter substance actually ever used? (Glose (check this with

this trip? What would the or possible suicide? do in the event of a scandal B/3

26. Hasver run an audit ongu 生 If not, why not? B/3

27. Why did Lobviously keep us away from at B/6

28. who proposed the name or t , formerly with this Agency. in connection with Artichoke? Doeg know him or does he know

ROUGH DRAFT

3.

[PAGE 4]
1. 29. were written tests" ever tried on the sub jocts, experimentaily or otherwise, in the use of those drugs? 會

30. Nere psychiatric tests ever tried in this connection?

31. Was hypnosis ever used inconnection with these drugs? If so, what were the results?

32. Has ever used hypnosis on (Someone should arranse a very discrect interview with in connection with this whole project on the"basis of testimony ascertained in F

33. Why did eave so suddenly? B6

3u. What wer the largest dosages ever given experimentally or otherwise? Result.s.

35. How come these Ha substances are called non-toxic?

36. what is the antidote for each? Why didsy say there was no antidote? B/6

taken in on the first case by people before being approached by outsiders, particulariy in connection with experimental programs.)

38. Were there ever any actual changes in the :stories of the subjects? Were any significant details produced? Were there any positive details, admissions or confessions made, . etc., etc.? (In this connection, the writer foels that brief reports'by the case-officers would probably be of value in the accessment of this type of research.)

39. While the writer was able only to physically observe reactions in the first two cases and, in part, cover by monitoring the last three cases, the writer noticed no outstanding or clearcut examples of good feeling being establishied on tie part, of the subject or any real euphoria on the part of the subject., etc.

h0. Would drawing pictures (along the linea ployus) A revcal anything before and after dosagos?

used at

-4-

[PAGE 5]
b. Nere the Porschach test ever used a

ul. How could you possihly administor thcse drugs with n very tough and very intelligent individual, particulariy if he refused to have a drink of any  liquid while talking with you?

42. and always talked about special signs ani indications that would he noticeable when the drugs were takinz effect. The writer would like to know just whatwere those signs that anc :would nobice and that another individual B would not, or more specifically a doctor or a competent interrogator couldn't nolice.

43. Specifically what did these things do that whisky, beer, vodka, gin wouldn't?

Lh. Can it ho said that in any way except negative, the test was successful?

L5. If, after two years of research and hundreds of thousands of dollars spent and the only substance developed are standard compounds such as the barhiturates, could we make how a case of fraud? …11

46. I6 mistress or is having an affair with him or is actually in love with him or if the reverse is r true, how can the it possibly be stated that she would be an impartial observer?

l7. In the critical opinion of the writer, the substancesunder no circumstances should be or should have heen turned over to anyone overseas. They should have been destroyed befoe returning to the U.S. This should be checked out by the proper people to see whether or not this was done.

5