MORI 190497

[PAGE 1]
b. By the Defector Center in

described a recent contact with

told of having worked in collaboration with November1950.

C. THE ADMINISTRATION OF TIE PROJECT

11 1. raised the question of in the substance of the project with professional friends. promised to develop one if desirable. \*.

2. stated he would like to establish an open list of cleared consultants so that he could have present at any meeting only those with a significant interest or contribution. #

3. As phases of the project might require the advice of higily specialized persons, consideration was given to tie possibility of having certain conferences set up on a one-time basis,

L. lagreed to make the necessary arrangements for the panel members to observe an interrogation when appropriate.

5. lio conplotion dates for project should be stated until the complete project outlinc has been prepared.

D.. SUGGESTED SPECIFIC PROJECTS FOR THE SUPPORT STAFF

l.Collection of substantive references for evaluation.by the panel in the delineation of areas of firm knowledge,

2. Preparation of a chart in which the situations likely to be faced by an individual were plotted against the knowm defense. (Conditions tobe spècified by

E. SUGGESTED AREAS OF IMEDIATE ACTIVITY

I. A study of the anenability of the individual and the detection of an "amenable type."

2. A thorough study of interrogation, "

3. án evaluation of the part which instrwnents can plan in such aprogram.

F. CONCLUSION

l. As the discussion cirew to a close, consideration was given to the, degree of success that could be attained, With respect to the

[PAGE 2]
defensive aspect, the panel can make n diefinite contribution if an improvement is made in existing methorls of resisting disclosure. With respect to the offensive aspect of eliciting information, a stucy of carefully selected areas of present information and properly designed research projects will enable us to develop better techniques.

2. In conclusion,! frestated three questions which A the panel will find useful in guidingtheir discussion:

a. What subject matter requires further evaluation?

.b.iho is the best man toevaluate present knowledge?

c. What research projects will furnish us with needed informationt

Pstated that he would call a meeting of the panel within the next week. The meeting adjourned at l630 hours.