Support usage of `predict_params` and `predict_proba_params` in cross validation

### Describe the workflow you want to enable

We can currently pass `predict_params` and `predict_proba_params` to `Pipeline`s, predictors, etc., at predict time when performing "manual" calls. When performing cross validation, however, there is no way to pass down any params to `estimator` to use when calling `predict`/`predict_proba`. I believe this to be a limitation of the library and think all cross-validation related code should allow passing down of said params to the estimator performing the prediction.

### Describe your proposed solution

Given scoring is at the core of all cross validation methods within scikit-learn, I believe it will suffice to update the scorer parent classes to accept a new arg (maybe just `predict_params` given prediction probabilities is conceptually a subset of predicting in general, but I'd be open to better naming here if people have a preference, or even updating `**predict_proba_params` to `**predict_params`) and then work backwards from there. 

Doing so, I can see that we'd need to update (new level of nesting indicates methods/functions that call the parent they're nested under):
- `_BaseScorer.__call__` and `_BaseScorer._score`
    - `_score`
        - `_rfe_single_fit` - nothing needed from here as used in `RFECV` and `RFE` doesn't have `predict_params` or `predict_proba_params`
        - `_incremental_fit_estimator`
            - `learning_curve` - generic function to be used on estimator --> needs updating. not used anywhere
        - `_fit_and_score`
            - `evaluate_candidates` - created inside of `BaseSearchCV.fit` --> add to fit signature
            - `cross_validate` - generic function to be used on estiamtor --> needs updating.
                - `cross_val_score` - generic function to be used on estiamtor --> needs updating.
                    - `GraphicalLassoCV.fit` - no `predict_params` to be used
            - `learning_curve` - already updated from above
            - `validation_curve` - generic function to be used on estiamtor --> needs updating. not used anywhere

As for how the arg will be added to method/function signatures, I think in general it depends on what the method/function is doing, e.g. use `**predict_params` in situations where only predicting is occuring, but use `predict_params` in situations where other logic is also performed (e.g. fitting, scoring, etc). In the all the above methods/functions, I believe they all perform fitting and predicting (either directly or within a sub-call) so I think it'd just be `predict_params` everywhere. This seems similar to how `fit_params` is currently passed around.

### Describe alternatives you've considered, if relevant

None

### Additional context

Related to [this comment](https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/12006#issuecomment-526533783)

I'm happy to take on this work if maintainers are happy for it to be done (I've actually got a branch locally with the relevant code updated, but am yet to update/write new tests in case the proposal is rejected)

COMMENT:
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/pull/24027 will fix this.

Labels: New Feature