MAINT Split `Splitter` into a `BaseSplitter` and a `Splitter` subclass to allow easier inheritance

### Summary
With #24678, we make it easier for the `Criterion` class to be inherited. However, the Splitter class can also leverage this improvement. We should separate the current `Splitter` class into an abstract base class for "any type of splitting" `BaseSplitter` and an abstract supervisededly splitter class that requires `y` labels `Splitter`. By keeping the names the same, this change is mostly backwards-compatible.

Moreover, we should refactor what `criterion.init` does into its two intended functionalities: i) setting data and ii) moving pointers around and updating criterion statistics.

### Proposed improvement
Based on discussion below, we want to preserve the `y` parameter passing chain of `Tree -> Splitter -> Criterion`. With the exception of `splitter.init`, all other functions can and should be part of the base class without any notion of whether or not the splitter is supervised, or unsupervised. In order to achieve this, we need to separate where `y` is passed to the criterion (currently it is done within `node_reset`.

1. Refactor `criterion.init` into two functions for initializing the data and resetting the pointers (https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/blob/b728b2e8b192857f3522007328fa66909ed68787/sklearn/tree/_criterion.pyx#L44-L69):
i) `criterion.init(y, sample_weight, weighted_n_samples, samples)`, which initializes the data for criterion.
ii) `criterion.set_pointer(start, end)`, which sets the pointers to the start/end of the samples we consider
2. Refactor `splitter.init` to pass the value of `y` to the criterion via the new `criterion.init` function (https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/blob/b728b2e8b192857f3522007328fa66909ed68787/sklearn/tree/_splitter.pyx#L96)
3. Refactor `splitter.node_reset` to call `criterion.set_pointer` instead of `criterion.init`. (https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/blob/9c9c8582dff9f4563aa130ef89f155bad0051493/sklearn/tree/_splitter.pyx#L180)
4. Refactor `Splitter` into `BaseSplitter` and `Splitter` class. The `BaseSplitter` will contain all the methods except for `init`. `Splitter` will subclass `BaseSplitter` and require the `init` function.

This makes Splitter easier to subclass and also removes some of the interdependency of parameters between Tree, Splitter and Criterion.

Once the changes are made, one should verify:

1. If `tree` submodule's Cython code still builds (i.e. `make clean` and then `pip install --verbose --no-build-isolation --editable .` should not error out)
2. verify unit tests inside `sklearn/tree` all pass
3. verify that the asv benchmarks do not show a performance regression.

`asv continuous --verbose --split --bench RandomForest upstream/main <new_branch_name>` and then for side-by-side comparison `asv compare main <new_branch_name>`

### Reference

As discussed in #24577 , I wrote up a doc on proposed improvements to the tree submodule that would:
1. make it easier for 3rd party packages to subclass existing sklearn tree code and
7. make it easier for sklearn itself to make improvements to the tree code with many of the modern improvements to trees

cc: @jjerphan 

@jshinm I think this is a good next issue to tackle because it is more involved, but does not require making any backward incompatible changes to the sklearn tree code.

COMMENT:
> Before moving forward, I want to confirm again that the 3 proposed changes are valid?

In theory, I would say yes.

I think the best is to implement the changes you propose in dedicated and atomic PR so that we can see if there is any problem with each part of this refactoring.

Does that work for you, @adam2392? Do you need any help?

Labels: module:tree, cython, Refactor