Clarification of output array type when metrics accept multiclass/multioutput

Clarification of how we should handle array output type when a metric outputs several values (i.e. accepts multiclass or multioutput input).

The issue was summarised succinctly in https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/pull/30439#issuecomment-2532238196:

> Not sure what should be the output namespace / device in case we output an array, e.g. roc_auc_score with average=None on multiclass problems...

Currently all regression/classification metrics that support array API and multiclass or multioutput, all output an array in the same namespace and device as the input (checked code and manually). Summary of these metrics :

### Regression metrics

Returns array in same namespace/device:
* [explained_variance_score](https://scikit-learn.org/dev/modules/generated/sklearn.metrics.explained_variance_score.html#sklearn.metrics.explained_variance_score)
* [r2_score](https://scikit-learn.org/dev/modules/generated/sklearn.metrics.r2_score.html#sklearn.metrics.r2_score) 
* [mean_absolute_error](https://scikit-learn.org/dev/modules/generated/sklearn.metrics.mean_absolute_error.html#sklearn.metrics.mean_absolute_error)
* [mean_absolute_percentage_error](https://scikit-learn.org/dev/modules/generated/sklearn.metrics.mean_absolute_percentage_error.html#sklearn.metrics.mean_absolute_percentage_error)
* [mean_pinball_loss](https://scikit-learn.org/dev/modules/generated/sklearn.metrics.mean_pinball_loss.html#sklearn.metrics.mean_pinball_loss)
* [mean_squared_error](https://scikit-learn.org/dev/modules/generated/sklearn.metrics.mean_squared_error.html#sklearn.metrics.mean_squared_error)
* [mean_squared_log_error](https://scikit-learn.org/dev/modules/generated/sklearn.metrics.mean_squared_log_error.html#sklearn.metrics.mean_squared_log_error)
* [root_mean_squared_error](https://scikit-learn.org/dev/modules/generated/sklearn.metrics.root_mean_squared_error.html#sklearn.metrics.root_mean_squared_error)
* [root_mean_squared_log_error](https://scikit-learn.org/dev/modules/generated/sklearn.metrics.root_mean_squared_log_error.html#sklearn.metrics.root_mean_squared_log_error)

### Classification metrics
Returns array in same namespace/device:

* [precision_recall_fscore_support](https://scikit-learn.org/dev/modules/generated/sklearn.metrics.precision_recall_fscore_support.html#sklearn.metrics.precision_recall_fscore_support) and family ([f1_score](https://scikit-learn.org/dev/modules/generated/sklearn.metrics.f1_score.html#sklearn.metrics.f1_score), [fbeta_score](https://scikit-learn.org/dev/modules/generated/sklearn.metrics.fbeta_score.html#sklearn.metrics.fbeta_score), [precision_score](https://scikit-learn.org/dev/modules/generated/sklearn.metrics.precision_score.html#sklearn.metrics.precision_score), [recall_score](https://scikit-learn.org/dev/modules/generated/sklearn.metrics.recall_score.html#sklearn.metrics.recall_score))

Looking at the metrics code, if we wanted to support a list of scalars, we'd generally have to do extra processing to convert an array (often output of an xp.** function) to a list of scalars.

Once we arrive at a consensus we should update the array API documentation and update the `check_array_api_metric` in tests such that when the output is array/list - we check that the output type etc is correct.

cc @ogrisel @betatim

COMMENT:
> So you mean that huggingface's trainer pytorch support automatically convert metric values to numpy on CPU so scikit-learn doing the same would not feel odd in that respect?

I think with respect to the general standard it would be better to convert to numpy. What I meant was currently it seems like we have to perform the computations on the cpu using numpy. Supporting the original arrays might allow metrics to be computed on the gpu.

Labels: Needs Decision, Array API