### (3) member states have been affected by the consequences of the covid-19 pandemic crisis in an unprecedented manner. the crisis has led to severe economic and social consequences. this has created an exceptional situation which needs to be addressed with specific measures in line with the european pillar of social rights. ### (3) member states have been affected by the consequences of the covid-19 pandemic crisis in an unprecedented manner. the crisis has led to severe economic and social consequences with a huge and most severe negative impact suffered by individuals and households already poor and most vulnerable , exacerbating their socio-economic conditions and seriously reducing their capacity to escape from poverty and social exclusion. this has created an exceptional situation which needs to be addressed with specific measures in line with the european pillar of social rights and with the charter of fundamental rights of the european union.


### (3) member states have been affected by the consequences of the covid-19 pandemic crisis in an unprecedented manner. the crisis has led to severe economic and social consequences. this has created an exceptional situation which needs to be addressed with specific measures in line with the european pillar of social rights. ### (3) member states have been affected by the consequences of the covid-19 pandemic crisis in an unprecedented manner. the crisis has led to severe economic and social consequences , and has exacerbated the situation of people experiencing or at risk of poverty , deepened social cleavages and increased job losses , unemployment rates and inequalities , especially in disadvantaged groups. this has created an exceptional situation which needs to be addressed with specific measures in line with the european pillar of social rights.


### (4) this has a particular impact on the fead. considering that the number of people suffering from food and material deprivation has been increasing due to the covid-19 pandemic and that the most deprived are exposed to particular risks and further hardships during this crisis , member states are facing additional funding needs in the delivery of support by the fund. ### (4) this has a particular impact on the fead. considering that poverty and social exclusion have been exacerbating and that the number of people suffering from food and material deprivation has been radically increasing due to the covid-19 pandemic and that the most deprived are exposed to particular risks and further hardships during this crisis , member states are facing additional funding needs in the delivery of support by the fund.


### (6) the commission issued a proposal for a regulation11 amending council regulation (eu , euratom) no 1311/201312 on 27 may 2020 and unlocked additional resources to support member states in crisis repair in the context of the covid-19 pandemic and preparing the recovery of the economy. as part of this package , an additional exceptional amount of eur 58 272 800 000 for budgetary commitment from the structural funds under the investment for growth and jobs goal , for the years 2020 , 2021 and 2022 is made available for this purpose , with a view to deploying them quickly for the real economy through the existing structures for the 2014-2020 cohesion policy programmes. the commission should set out the breakdown of the additional resources for each member state on the basis of an allocation method based on the latest available objective statistical data concerning member states’ relative prosperity and the extent of the effect of the current crisis on their economies. in order to reflect the evolving nature of the effects of the crisis , the breakdown should be revised in 2021 on the basis of the same allocation method using the latest statistical data available by 19 october 2021. in order to provide for an effective response to the social impact of the covid-19 outbreak on the most deprived , it is appropriate that the additional resources may be allocated by member states to the fead , in accordance with their needs. in doing so , member states should pay due attention to the increases in the number of the most deprived since the covid-19 pandemic. in addition , it is necessary to establish ceilings concerning the allocation of the increased resources to technical assistance of the member state. taking account of the expected quick spending of the additional resources , the commitments linked to these additional resources should also be decommitted at the closure of the programmes. possibilities for financial transfers under the investment for growth and jobs goal between the erdf , the esf and the fead are also introduced for the additional resources. ### (6) the commission issued a proposal for a regulation11 amending council regulation (eu , euratom) no 1311/201312 on 27 may 2020 and unlocked additional resources to support member states in crisis repair in the context of the covid-19 pandemic and preparing the socio-economic recovery. as part of this package , an additional exceptional amount of eur 58 272 800 000 for budgetary commitment from the structural funds under the investment for growth and jobs goal , for the years 2020 , 2021 and 2022 is made available for this purpose , with a view to deploying them quickly for supporting people and the real economy through the existing structures for the 2014-2020 cohesion policy programmes. the commission should set out the breakdown of the additional resources for each member state on the basis of an allocation method based on the latest available objective statistical data concerning member states’ relative prosperity and the extent of the socio-economic effects of the current crisis. non-governmental organisations working in the field of poverty and social exclusion should be involved in order to enhance the overall approach aimed at correctly reach and include in statistical data the situation of all the most deprived people. in order to reflect the evolving nature of the socio-economic effects of the crisis , the breakdown should be revised in 2021 on the basis of the same allocation method using the latest statistical data available by 19 october 2021. in order to provide for an effective response to the social impact of the covid-19 outbreak on the most deprived , it is appropriate that the additional resources may be allocated by member states to the fead , in accordance with their needs. in doing so , member states should pay due attention to the increases in the number of the most deprived since the covid-19 pandemic , making sure that operations comply with the horizontal principle of gender equality. in addition , it is necessary to establish ceilings concerning the allocation of the increased resources to technical assistance of the member state. taking account of the expected quick spending of the additional resources , the commitments linked to these additional resources should also be decommitted at the closure of the programmes. possibilities for financial transfers under the investment for growth and jobs goal between the erdf , the esf and the fead are also introduced for the additional resources.


### (8) in order to ensure that member states have sufficient financial means to swiftly implement crisis repair actions in the context of the covid-19 pandemic and prepare the recovery of the economy , it is necessary to provide a higher level of pre-financing payment for the quick implementation of actions supported by the additional resources. the magnitude of the pre-financing should ensure that member states have the means to arrange for advance payments to beneficiaries where necessary and to reimburse beneficiaries quickly following the submission of payment claims. ### (8) in order to ensure that member states have sufficient financial means to swiftly implement crisis repair actions in the context of the covid-19 pandemic and prepare the socio-economic recovery , it is necessary to provide a higher level of pre-financing payment for the quick implementation of actions supported by the additional resources. the magnitude of the pre-financing should ensure that member states have the means to arrange for advance payments to beneficiaries where necessary and to reimburse beneficiaries quickly following the submission of payment claims.


### (9) with a view to alleviating the burden on public budgets regarding crisis repair in the context of the covid-19 pandemic and preparing the recovery of the economy , it is appropriate that the additional resources are not subject to co-financing. ### (9) with a view to alleviating the burden on public budgets regarding crisis repair in the context of the covid-19 pandemic and preparing the socio-economic recovery , it is appropriate that the additional resources are not subject to co-financing.


### 2. appreciates the foundation’s activities to support the reform of vocational training in the union’s partner countries; ### 2. notes that the etf has been involved in the identification , formulation , implementation , monitoring , and evaluation of the eu external programmes in skills and human capital development and employment; appreciates that the etf is the only eu agency with a mandate to work outside the eu in supporting the eu’s external action in the area of education , training , skills and labour market systems and to support reform of vocational training in the union’s partner countries;


### 3. notes that in 2018 the foundation started implementing its 17 internal control principles adopted in november 2017; notes also , based on information from the foundation , that any open actions were integrated in the foundation’s development plan and would be addressed as priority areas for improvement in 2019; ### 3. notes that in 2018 the foundation started implementing its improved 17 internal control principles adopted in november 2017 and that the 2018 annual assessment of internal controls was based completely on the new internal control principles; notes also , based on information from the foundation , that any open actions were integrated in the foundation’s development plan and would be addressed as priority areas for improvement in 2019;


### 5. welcomes the fact that the foundation implemented actions which led to the formal closure of all recommendations issued by the commission’s internal audit service from the 2017 audit of progress monitoring in vocational and educational training (vet); ### 5. welcomes the fact that the foundation implemented actions which led to the formal closure of all recommendations issued by the commission’s internal audit service from the 2017 audit of progress monitoring in vocational and educational training (vet) and that the rate of implementation of internal audits recommendations is 100 % for a third year in a row;


### 2. expresses its satisfaction that the budget implementation rate stood at 99.6 % in 2018 (100 % in 2017); ### 2. expresses its satisfaction with the very positive performance of the foundation of having an 83 % delivery rate and a close to 100 % budget implementation rate at 99.6 % in 2018 (100 % in 2017);


### 3. appreciates eurofound’s work to provide knowledge and expertise to support policies on improving living and working conditions across the union; ### 3. stresses the importance of eurofound's high-quality work to provide knowledge , expertise and evidence-based support for european policy development and policymakers in the areas of living and working conditions , labour market and industrial relations across the union , and the importance of retaining the tripartite nature of its governance model involving employer and worker organisations , governments from all member states , as well as the european commission;


### 4. appreciates the foundation’s cooperation with other eu agencies under the remit of dg employment; ### 4. appreciates the foundation’s support to trade unions , employer organisations , national governments , and european institutions and its cooperation with other eu agencies working in the field of employment , social affairs and inclusion under the remit of dg employment and particularly between the foundation , eu-osha , cedefop , etf and eige; highlights the importance of maintaining active cooperation with all actors and of supporting their work in the development of sustainable competitiveness , social inclusion , social dialogue , and partnership;


### 5. notes with regret from the court’s report that the ex-ante controls performed by eurofound within the context of intermediary services provided by a framework contractor were not effective , as well as the court’s observation that the foundation should adapt ex-ante controls on payments under such contracts and ensure the existence of a competitive procedure for all procurements; notes from the foundation’s reply that the respective framework contract had expired and the new one had successfully addressed the issues raised by the court; ### 5. notes with regret from the court’s report that the ex-ante controls performed by eurofound within the context of intermediary services provided by a framework contractor were not effective , as well as the court’s observation that the foundation should adapt ex-ante controls on payments under such contracts and ensure the existence of a competitive procedure for all procurements; stresses that the inter-institutional contract was led by the european commission and that eurofound did not have an input in the design of the tender nor in the setup of the pricing structure , which made it harder to compare easily with other providers; notes from the foundation’s reply that the respective framework contract had expired and the new one provides for greater promotion of fair competition and has successfully addressed the issues raised by the court;


### 6. notes that an external evaluation of the eu agencies under the remit of dg employment (eurofound , cedefop , etf and eu-osha) was carried out in 2018 , on behalf of the commission , with regard to their relevance , effectiveness , efficiency , coherence and eu value-added; calls on the foundation to report to the discharge authority on the results of this evaluation; ### deleted


### 2. notes with satisfaction that , according to the annual report of the european court of auditors’ (the 'court') on union agencies for the financial year 2018 (the 'court’s report') , the court issued an unqualified audit opinion on the reliability of the accounts of all agencies; notes in addition that the court issued an unqualified opinion on the legality and regularity of the revenue underlying the accounts for all agencies; observes that the court issued an unqualified opinion on the legality and regularity of the payments underlying the accounts for all agencies , except for the european asylum support office (easo); points out with regret that for easo’s payments for the financial years 2016 and 2017 , the court issued a qualified opinion; ### 2. notes with satisfaction that , according to the annual report of the european court of auditors’ (the 'court') on union agencies for the financial year 2018 (the 'court’s report') , the court issued an unqualified audit opinion on the reliability of the accounts of all agencies; notes in addition that the court issued an unqualified opinion on the legality and regularity of the revenue underlying the accounts for all agencies; observes that the court issued an unqualified opinion on the legality and regularity of the payments underlying the accounts for all agencies , except for the european asylum support office (easo); notes that for easo the court issued a basis for a qualified opinion , in relation to its findings reported for the financial years 2016 and 2017 on the legality and regularity of the payments , but that except for the effects of the financial years 2016 and 2017 , the court is of the opinion that the easo payments underlying the annual accounts for the year ended 31 december 2018 are legal and regular in all material aspects;


### 17. notes from the court’s report that , following its rapid case review in 2017 on how agencies implemented the commitment made to cut 5 % of staff in their establishment plans during 2014-2018 , it concluded that the 5 % reduction had been implemented , albeit with some delays; ### 17. notes from the court’s report that , following its rapid case review in 2017 on how agencies implemented the commitment made to cut 5 % of staff in their establishment plans during 2014-2018 , it concluded that the 5 % reduction had been implemented , albeit with some delays; notes that some agencies have implemented a staff reduction of 10% and that several agencies report about insufficient staff to implement new tasks assigned , as well as about increased workload which creates a risk for the proper implementation of their objectives;


### 23. welcomes the fact that most agencies , except the translation centre for the bodies of the european union (cdt) and the european union agency for the operational management of large-scale it systems in the area of freedom , security and justice (eu-lisa) have guidelines in place for granting public access to documents; however , notes that before the end of this year , cdt foresees to have guidelines in place and eu-lisa is going to develop internal rules on how to handle requests to access public documents and endeavours to adopt them in 2020; ### 23. welcomes the fact that most agencies , except the translation centre for the bodies of the european union (cdt) and the european union agency for the operational management of large-scale it systems in the area of freedom , security and justice (eu-lisa) have guidelines in place for granting public access to documents; however , notes that cdt foresees to have guidelines in place and eu-lisa is going to develop internal rules on how to handle requests to access public documents and endeavours to adopt them in 2020;


### 2. commends the budget implementation rate of 100 % in 2018 compared to 96 % in 2017; ### 2. commends that the agency was able to deliver its ambitious work programme almost in its entirety and above the established target which resulted in budget implementation rate of 100 % in 2018 compared to 96 % in 2017; welcomes that stakeholders’ overall satisfaction with the agency’s work is very high (approx. 90%) according to an independent stakeholders’ survey;


### 3. appreciates eu-osha’s activities to develop , gather and provide reliable and relevant information , analysis and tools on occupational safety and health which contribute to the eu policy aiming to promote healthy and safe workplaces across the union; ### 3. supports eu-osha's activities to develop , gather and provide reliable and relevant information , analysis and tools on occupational safety and health which contribute to the eu policy aiming to promote healthy and safe workplaces across the union and stresses to this end the importance of ensuring adequate staff and financial resources allowing the agency to fully implement its tasks;


### 5. notes with regret from the court’s report that the carry-overs to 2019 for title ii (administrative expenditure) stood at 35 % (2017: 40 %) while for title iii (operational expenditure) they were as high as 46 % (2017: 40 %) , which was in contradiction with the budgetary principle of annuality; recalls that such high carry-overs were also reported for the financial years 2016 and 2017 and calls on the agency to analyse the underlying reasons and to improve the budget planning accordingly; notes the agency’s reply specifying the possibility of adding and justifying a list of potential additional it purchases regarding carry-overs for title ii and pointing to the planned nature of carry-overs regarding the programming of large-scale research projects , running over two years , for title iii; ### 5. notes with regret from the court’s report that the carry-overs to 2019 for title ii (administrative expenditure) stood at 35 % (2017: 40 %) while for title iii (operational expenditure) they were as high as 46 % (2017: 40 %) , which was in contradiction with the budgetary principle of annuality; recalls that such high carry-overs were also reported for the financial years 2016 and 2017 and calls on the agency to analyse the underlying reasons and to improve the budget planning accordingly; notes the agency’s reply specifying the possibility of adding and justifying a list of potential additional it purchases regarding carry-overs for title ii and pointing to the planned nature of carry-overs regarding the programming of large-scale research projects , running over two years , for title iii in order to achieve more significant impact for the given resources;


### 2. commends the budget implementation rate of 100 % in 2018 compared to 99.95 % in 2017; ### 2. commends the budget implementation rate of 100 % in 2018 compared to 99.95 %in 2017; notes that this exceptional result and budget execution demonstrates the centre's successful efforts towards optimal use of resources;


### 3. appreciates the centre’s work to provide research , analyses and technical advice in vocational education and training (vet) , qualifications and skills policies; ### 3. appreciates the centre’s highquality work to provide research , analyses and technical advice in vocational education and training(vet) , qualifications and skills policies; stresses to this end the importance of ensuring adequate staff and financial resources allowing cedefop to implement its growing and changing tasks;


### 4. appreciates the centre’s cooperation with other agencies under the remit of the committee on employment and social affairs; ### 4. appreciates the centre’s continuous support to the european commission , member states and social partners , and its cooperation with other agencies under the remit of the committee on employment and social affairs and in particular with etf and eurofound; notes in this regard that the recent cooperation between cedefop and eurofound has helped to develop a common project and skills forecast for the manufacturing sector , which demonstrated the quality and added value of cedefop's work for the other agencies;


### 5. notes with regret that the court identified weaknesses in two recruitment procedures which undermined the principles of transparency and equal treatment of applicants; notes from the centre’s reply that it had already revised its conflict of interest procedure and had been in the process of undertaking measures to improve its selection procedures and to ensure that any prolongation of a reserve list would be done in a regular manner; ### 5. notes with regret that the court identified weaknesses in two recruitment procedures which undermined the principles of transparency and equal treatment of applicants; acknowledges , however , that cedefop had already revised its conflict of interest procedure and had been in a thorough process of improving its selection procedures in general and ensuring that any prolongation of a reserve list would be done in a regular manner and that scoring methods and documentation of the whole selection process would be reviewed; notes in this regard that the vacancy notice model has been improved substantially to ensure increased transparency and clarity criteria;


### 7. notes the court’s observation that in the procurement procedure for its travel agency services the centre should have used more detailed and adequate criteria regarding the price and quality in order to ensure the best value for money contract; notes the centre’s commitment to improve the application of quality award criteria for similar services in the future; ### 7. notes the court’s observation that in the procurement procedure for its travel agency services the centre should have used more detailed and adequate criteria regarding the price and quality in order to ensure the best value for money contract; commends the centre’s commitment to improve the application of quality award criteria for similar services in the future and acknowledges that cedefop has already adjusted the formula used to identify potentially abnormal low tenders; encourages the centre to further improve its public procurement procedures ensuring full compliance with the applicable rules and best value for money principle;


### (7) posted third-country nationals subject to directive 96/71/ec of the european parliament and of the council39 should not be covered by this directive. this should not prevent third-country nationals who are legally residing and working in a member state and posted to another member state from continuing to enjoy equal treatment with respect to nationals of the member state of origin for the duration of their posting , in respect of those terms and conditions of employment which are not affected by the application of directive 96/71/ec . ### (7) genuinely posted third-country nationals subject to directives 96/71/ec , 2018/957/eu , 2020/1057/eu and 2014/67/eu of the european parliament and of the council39 should not be covered by this directive. this should not prevent third-country nationals who are legally residing and working in a member state and posted to another member state from continuing to enjoy equal treatment with respect to nationals of the member state of origin for the duration of their posting , in respect of those terms and conditions of employment which are not affected by the application of directives 96/71/ec , 2018/957/eu , 2020/1057/eu and 2014/67/eu. to prevent forum shopping and artificial cross-border arrangements , member states should provide for adequate measures to protect third-country workers from abuse through fraudulent postings to other member states. in the single application procedure and in the monitoring of employers , due regard should be given to the provisions of regulation (ec) no 593/2008 of the european parliament and of the council (‘rome i’) to verify that the member state concerned is in fact the habitual place of work.


### (10) third-country nationals who have been admitted to the territory of a member state to work on a seasonal basis and have applied for admission or have been admitted to the territory of a member state in accordance with directive 2014/36/eu of the european parliament and of the council41 should not be covered by this directive given that they fall within the scope of directive 2014/36/eu , which establishes a specific regime . ### deleted


### (15) the designation of the competent authority under this directive should be without prejudice to the role and responsibilities of other authorities and , where applicable , the social partners , with regard to the examination of , and the decision on , the application. ### (15) the designation of the competent authorities under this directive should be without prejudice to the role and responsibilities of other authorities and , where applicable , the social partners , with regard to the examination of , and the decision on , the application , in addition to monitoring , implementation and enforcement of labour standards and social security regulations. information on working conditions should be instrumental for competent authorities , such as labour inspectorates , public employment services or social security institutions , to effectively guaranteeing the rights of third country national workers.


### (19) the provisions of this directive on the single permit and on the residence permit issued for purposes other than work should not prevent member states from issuing an additional paper document in order to be able to give more precise information on the employment relationship for which the format of the residence permit leaves insufficient space. such a document can serve to prevent the exploitation of third-country nationals and combat illegal employment but should be optional for member states and should not serve as a substitute for a work permit thereby compromising the concept of the single permit. technical possibilities offered by article 4 of regulation (ec) no 1030/2002 and point (a)20 of the annex thereto can also be used to store such information in an electronic format. ### (19) the provisions of this directive on the single permit and on the residence permit issued for purposes other than work should not prevent member states from issuing an additional paper document in order to be able to give more precise information on the employment contract or relationship for which the format of the residence permit leaves insufficient space. such a document can serve to prevent the exploitation of third-country nationals and combat illegal employment but should be optional for member states , and should not be a requirement for the third-country national to obtain the single permit and should not serve as a substitute for a work permit thereby compromising the concept of the single permit. changes to working conditions contained in that document should not constitute a change of employment for the purposes of the single permit. information on working conditions should be instrumental for competent authorities , such as labour inspectorates , public employment services or social security institutions to effectively guaranteeing the rights of third country national workers. technical possibilities offered by article 4 of regulation (ec) no 1030/2002 and point (a)20 of the annex thereto can also be used to store such information in an electronic format.


### (25) working conditions as referred to in this directive should cover at least pay and dismissal , health and safety at the workplace , working time and leave taking into account collective agreements in force. ### (25) decent working conditions as referred to in this directive should cover at least working conditions , pay and dismissal , health and safety at the workplace , working time , leave and holidays taking into account collective agreements in force.


### (27) third-country workers should enjoy equal treatment as regards social security. branches of social security are defined in regulation (ec) no 883/2004 of the european parliament and of the council48 . the provisions on equal treatment concerning social security in this directive should also apply to workers admitted to a member state directly from a third country. nevertheless , this directive should not confer on third-country workers more rights than those already provided in existing union law in the field of social security for third-country nationals who are in cross-border situations. ### (27) third-country workers should enjoy equal treatment as regards social security. branches of social security are defined in regulation (ec) no 883/2004 of the european parliament and of the council48 . the provisions on equal treatment concerning social security in this directive should also apply to workers admitted to a member state directly from a third country.


### (32) to ensure the proper enforcement of this directive , member states should ensure that appropriate mechanisms are in place for the monitoring of employers and that , where appropriate , effective and adequate inspections are carried out on their respective territories. the selection of employers to be inspected should be based primarily on a risk assessment to be carried out by the competent authorities in the member states taking into account factors such as the sector in which a company operates and any past record of infringement. ### (32) to ensure the proper enforcement of this directive , member states should ensure , in cooperation with the social partners , and in accordance with ilo convention 81 on labour inspection , that appropriate mechanisms are in place for the monitoring of employers and that effective , unannounced , and adequate inspections are carried out on their respective territories. third country national workers still have a higher probability of experiencing violations of their rights and working conditions than other groups of workers. therefore , the selection of employers to be inspected should be based primarily on a risk assessment to be carried out by the competent authorities in the member states taking into account factors such as the sector in which a company operates and any past record of infringement. the agricultural , transport , distribution , hospitality , and construction sectors are known for their higher risk of labour standard violations. in order to be able to improve the proper enforcement of this directive and to exchange best practices between member states , it is crucial to monitor the patterns of application , renewal and withdrawal of single permits.


### (32) to ensure the proper enforcement of this directive , member states should ensure that appropriate mechanisms are in place for the monitoring of employers and that , where appropriate , effective and adequate inspections are carried out on their respective territories. the selection of employers to be inspected should be based primarily on a risk assessment to be carried out by the competent authorities in the member states taking into account factors such as the sector in which a company operates and any past record of infringement. ### (32) to ensure the proper enforcement of this directive , member states , working with the social partners , should ensure that appropriate mechanisms are in place for the monitoring of employers and that effective and adequate inspections are carried out on their respective territories. the selection of employers to be inspected should be based primarily on a risk assessment to be carried out by the competent authorities in the member states taking into account factors such as the sector in which a company operates and any past record of infringement.


### (34) the single permit should authorise the third-country national to change the employer during the period of its validity. member states should be able to require a notification of the change and to check the labour market situation where a change of employer takes place. the single permit should not be withdrawn during a period of at least three months in the event of the unemployment of its holder. ### (34) the single permit should authorise the third-country national to seek employment and conclude an employment contract with a different employer during the period of its validity. member states should require a notification of the change of employer and of any information related to the employment contract or relationship , prior to the first working day , and be able to check the labour market situation where a change of employer takes place , based on the first check. member states should ensure that the single permit holder continues his or her employment contract or relationship with the same employer during the renewal process. the single permit should not be withdrawn during a period of at least nine months in the event of the unemployment of its holder.


### ‘third-country worker’ means a third-country national who has been admitted to the territory of a member state and who is legally residing and is allowed to work in the context of an employment relationship in that member state in accordance with national law or practice; ### ‘third-country worker’ means a third-country national who is legally residing and is allowed to work in the context of an employment contract or employment relationship in the territory of a member state , in accordance with national law , collective agreements , or practice , with consideration to the case-law of the court of justice;


### who have applied for admission or have been admitted to the territory of a member state as seasonal workers in accordance with directive 2014/36/eu or au pairs in accordance with directive (eu) 2016/801 ; ### deleted


### who are authorised to reside in a member state on the basis of temporary protection , or who have applied for authorisation to reside there on that basis and are awaiting a decision on their status; ### deleted


### 3. member states may decide that chapter ii does not apply to third-country nationals who have been either authorised to work in the territory of a member state for a period not exceeding six months or who have been admitted to a member state for the purpose of study. ### 3. member states may decide that chapter ii does not apply to third-country nationals who have been admitted to a member state for the purpose of study in accordance with directive (eu) 2016/801 , as seasonal workers in accordance with directive 2014/36/eu , or as au pairs in accordance with directive (eu) 2016/801.


### 1. an application to issue , amend or renew a single permit shall be submitted by way of a single application procedure. member states shall determine whether applications for a single permit are to be submitted by the third-country national or by the third-country national’s employer. member states may also decide to allow an application from either of the two. if the application is to be submitted by the third-country national , member states shall allow the application to be introduced both from a third country and in the territory of the member state in which the third-country national is legally present. ### 1. an application to issue , amend or renew a single permit shall be submitted by way of a single application procedure. member states shall allow applications for a single permit to be submitted by either the third-country national or by the third-country national’s employer. where the third-country national submits the application , member states shall allow the application to be introduced both from a third country and in the territory of the member state in which the third-country national is legally present. where the employer submits the application , member states shall ensure that the third-country national on whose behalf the application has been submitted is kept informed about the status of the application , in each stage of the process , and the outcome of the application.


### the competent authority shall adopt a decision on the complete application as soon as possible and in any event within four months of the date on which the application was lodged. ### the competent authority shall adopt and notify a decision on the complete application as soon as possible and in any event within 90 days of the date on which the application was lodged.


### where no decision is taken within the time limit provided for in this paragraph , any consequences shall be determined by national law. ### where no decision is taken within the time limit provided for in this paragraph , any fee required by the member states in accordance with article 10 shall be reimbursed to the applicant. further consequences shall be determined by national law and shall contribute to the effective implementation of the time limits. member states shall allocate sufficient resources for timely processing.


### member states may indicate additional information related to the employment relationship of the third-country national (such as the name and address of the employer , place of work , type of work , working hours , remuneration) in paper format , or store such data in electronic format as referred to in article 4 of regulation (ec) no 1030/2002 and in point (a)20 of the annex thereto. ### member states shall indicate information related to working conditions in employment offers , the employment contract or relationship of the third-country national , at least the name and address of the employer , habitual place of work , type of work , working hours , remuneration , in paper format , and store such data in electronic format as referred to in article 4 of regulation (ec) no 1030/2002 and in point(a)20 of the annex thereto. a change to the conditions of employment indicated above shall not constitute a change of employer. member states shall grant the third-country national access to this information , and he or she shall be informed about any changes to this information.


### member states may indicate additional information related to the employment relationship of the third-country national (such as the name and address of the employer , place of work , type of work , working hours , remuneration) in paper format , or store such data in electronic format as referred to in article 4 of regulation (ec) no 1030/2002 and point (a)20 of the annex thereto. ### member states shall indicate information related to the employment contract or relationship of the third-country national , at least the name and address of the employer , habitual place of work , type of work , working hours , remuneration , in paper format and store such data in electronic format as referred to in article 4 of regulation (ec) no 1030/2002 and point (a)20 of the annex thereto. a change to the conditions of employment indicated above shall not constitute a change of employer. member states shall grant the third-country national access to this information , and he or she shall be informed about any changes to this information.


### member states shall make easily accessible , and provide upon request: ### member states shall make easily accessible , and provide , with every application by a third-country national:


### member states shall make easily accessible , and provide upon request: ### member states shall provide free of charge , in a language the third-country national can understand , upon request


### member states may require applicants to pay fees , where appropriate , for processing applications in accordance with this directive. the level of such fees shall be proportionate and shall be based on the services actually provided for the processing of applications and the issuance of permits. ### member states may require applicants to pay fees , where appropriate , for processing applications and renewals in accordance with this directive. the level of such fees shall be proportionate , affordable and shall be based on the services actually provided for the processing of applications and the issuance of permits. where such fees or any other costs are paid by the third-country national , member states shall ensure that he or she is entitled to reimbursement from the employer. when such fees or costs are paid by the employers , they shall not be recoverable from the third-country national.


### 1. where a single permit has been issued , it shall authorise , during its period of validity , its holder at least to: ### 1. where a single permit has been issued , whether in paper form or electronically , it shall authorise , during its period of validity , its holder at least to:


### be informed about the holder’s own rights linked to the permit conferred by this directive and/or by national law. ### be informed about the holder’s own rights linked to the permit conferred by this directive by union and national law , about filing complaints , access mechanisms for dispute resolution and legal redress , as well as about the contact details of organisations representing workers , in particular trade unions , of national labour inspectorates , the european labour authority , ngos , grassroots organisations , and of other judicial assistance available under national law.


### the right of the single permit holder to pursue such a change of employer may be suspended for a maximum of 30 days while the member state concerned checks the labour market situation and verifies that the requirements laid down by union or national law are fulfilled. the member state concerned may oppose the change of employment within those 30 days. ### the right of the single permit holder to pursue such a change of employer may be suspended for a maximum of 30 days while the member state concerned checks compliance with the first check of the labour market situation and verifies that the requirements laid down by union or national law are fulfilled. the member state shall require that the terms of employment and working conditions are in compliance with applicable labour standards and collective agreements. the member state concerned may oppose the change of employment within those 30 days. regardless of the outcome , the single permit holder shall be eligible to continue working for the current employer or to enter a period of unemployment. the single permit holder shall be informed about the status of the checks , in each stage of the process , and the outcome.


### working conditions , including pay and dismissal as well as health and safety at the workplace; ### terms of employment , decent working conditions , including remuneration and dismissal , working hours , overtime rates , annual and sick leave , leaves related to care and holidays , training , protection against discriminatory , illegitimate and disproportionate deductions from the remuneration , allowances or reimbursement of expenditure to cover travel , board and lodging expenses , as well as equality of treatment between men and women , and health and safety at the workplace , in accordance with directive (eu) 2019/1152 , directive 2008/104/ec , directive 89/391 eec , and directive (eu) 2022/2041 on adequate minimum wages in the european union;


### working conditions , including pay and dismissal as well as health and safety at the workplace; ### working conditions , including pay and , specifically , collective bargaining , and dismissal as well as health and safety at the workplace;


### freedom of association and affiliation and membership of an organisation representing workers or employers or of any organisation whose members are engaged in a specific occupation , including the benefits conferred by such organisations , without prejudice to the national provisions on public policy and public security; ### the right to strike , freedom of association and affiliation and membership of an organisation representing workers or employers or of any organisation whose members are engaged in a specific occupation , including the benefits conferred by such organisations , without prejudice to the national provisions on public policy and public security;


### 1. member states shall provide for measures to prevent possible infringements by employers of national provisions adopted pursuant to article 12. preventive measures shall include monitoring , assessment and , where appropriate , inspections in accordance with national law or administrative practice. ### 1. member states shall , in cooperation with the social partners , provide for measures to prevent possible infringements by employers of national provisions adopted pursuant to article 12. preventive measures shall include monitoring , assessment and inspections , in particular in sectors with a high risk of violations of labour rights and standards , in accordance with national law or administrative practice.


### 1. member states shall provide for measures to prevent possible infringements by employers of national provisions adopted pursuant to article 12. preventive measures shall include monitoring , assessment and , where appropriate , inspections in accordance with national law or administrative practice. ### 1. member states shall , in collaboration with the social partners , provide for measures to prevent possible infringements by employers of national provisions adopted pursuant to article 12. preventive measures shall include monitoring , assessment and , where appropriate , inspections in accordance with national law or administrative practice.


### 2. member states shall lay down the rules on penalties applicable to infringements by employers of national provisions adopted pursuant to article 12. the penalties provided for shall be effective , proportionate and dissuasive. member states shall , without delay , notify the commission of those rules and of those measures and shall notify it , without delay , of any subsequent amendment affecting them. ### 2. member states shall lay down the rules on penalties applicable to infringements by employers of national provisions adopted pursuant to article 12. the penalties provided for shall be effective , proportionate and dissuasive and particular attention shall be paid to the subcontracting chain. member states shall , without delay , notify the commission of those rules and of those measures and shall notify it , without delay , of any subsequent amendment affecting them.


### 3. member states shall ensure that services in charge of inspection of labour or other competent authorities and , where provided for under national law in respect of national workers , organisations representing workers’ interests have access to the workplace. ### 3. member states shall , in cooperation with the social partners , and in accordance with ilo convention 81 on labour inspection , ensure effective , proportionate and non-discriminatory controls and field inspections conducted by labour inspectorates , including routine and unannounced visits. member states shall develop the capability of enforcement authorities to proactively target and pursue non-compliant employers. member states shall ensure that services in charge of inspection of labour or other competent authorities and , where provided for under national law , organisations representing workers , in particular trade unions , have access to the workplace and , with the agreement of the worker , to their housing.


### 1. member states shall ensure that there are effective mechanisms through which third-country workers may lodge complaints against their employers: ### 1. member states shall , in accordance with article 47 of the charter of fundamental rights of the eu , ensure that there are timely and effective mechanisms through which third-country workers may lodge complaints against their employers:


### a. whereas the social economy encompasses diverse types of private entities , independent of public authorities , as cooperatives , mutual benefit societies , associations (including charities) , foundations , social enterprises , and other legal forms , all characterised by different operating and organisational principles and features such as the primacy of people as well as social purpose over profit , the reinvestment of most profits/surpluses , and democratic or participatory governance; ### a. whereas the social economy encompasses diverse types of private entities , independent of public authorities , as cooperatives , mutual societies , associations (including charities) , foundations , social enterprises , and other legal forms , all characterised by different operating and organisational principles and features such as the primacy of people as well as social purpose over profit , the reinvestment of most profits/surpluses , and democratic or participatory governance;


### b. whereas the social economy has played an important role in mitigating and addressing the short- and long-term impacts of covid-19 on the eu’s social market , society and economy and has driven and contributed to social and economic resilience thanks to the long-term orientation of the european pillar business model and the nature of social rights and the targets and activities of the social economy12 ; ### b. whereas the social economy has played an important role in mitigating and addressing the short- and long-term impacts of covid-19 on the eu’s social market , society and economy and has driven and contributed to social and economic resilience thanks to the economic and social sustainability of its business model12 ;


### b. whereas the social economy has played an important role in mitigating and addressing the short- and long-term impacts of covid-19 on the eu’s social market , society and economy and has driven and contributed to social and economic resilience thanks to the long-term orientation of the european pillar business model and the nature of social rights and the targets and activities of the social economy12 ; ### b. whereas the social economy has played an important role in mitigating and addressing the short- and long-term impacts of covid-19 on the eu’s social market , society and economy and has driven and contributed to social and economic resilience thanks to its long-term orientation and the nature of social rights and the targets and activities of the social economy12 ;


### b. whereas the social economy has played an important role in mitigating and addressing the short- and long-term impacts of covid-19 on the eu’s social market , society and economy and has driven and contributed to social and economic resilience thanks to the long-term orientation of the european pillar business model and the nature of social rights and the targets and activities of the social economy12; ### b. whereas the social economy has played an important role in mitigating and addressing the short- and long-term impacts of covid-19 on the eu’s social market , society and economy , often plugging the gaps left by the state , partly through its capacity to intercept specific regional needs , and has driven and contributed to social and economic resilience thanks to the long-term orientation of the european pillar business model and the nature of social rights and the targets and activities of the social economy12;


### c. whereas social economy organisations have a long history in the majority of member states , most of which have adopted specific laws in this field , and have established themselves as crucial market players; ### c. whereas social economy organisations have a long history in the majority of member states , most of which have adopted specific laws in this field , and have established themselves as crucial market players; whereas regulatory frameworks must ensure that social economy enterprises can compete effectively in all economic sectors;


### c. whereas social economy organisations have a long history in the majority of member states , most of which have adopted specific laws in this field , and have established themselves as crucial market players; ### c. whereas social economy organisations have a long history in the majority of member states , most of which have adopted specific laws in this field , and have established themselves as crucial market players; whereas , however , their heterogeneous nature , with these organisations varying considerably across different countries , has meant they have often been overshadowed within major european development processes , with their clear merits going unrecognised and their enormous potential held back;


### 1. welcomes the commission’s action plan for the social economy (seap) , the guiding principles defining the social economy set therein , the political impetus it provides to its development , and the wealth of measures announced therein; ### 1. welcomes the commission’s action plan for the social economy(seap) , the guiding principles defining the social economy set therein , the political impetus it provides to its development , and the wealth of measures announced; stresses that during times when the european union is facing enormous challenges in terms of unemployment and social exclusion as well as demographic change , social economy entities have an important role to play , both in society and the labour market;


### 2. believes , however , that concrete measures and follow-up measures for achieving each objective need to be laid out and the interlinkages between measures further detailed; considers it necessary to establish a calendar for all actions included in the seap , with a view to guiding the relevant authorities in the implementation; ### 2. believes , however , that concrete measures and follow-up measures for achieving each objective need to be laid out and the interlinkages between measures and other eu-level initiatives further detailed; considers it necessary to establish a calendar for all actions included in the seap , with a view to guiding the relevant authorities in the implementation;


### 2. believes , however , that concrete measures and follow-up measures for achieving each objective need to be laid out and the interlinkages between measures further detailed; considers it necessary to establish a calendar for all actions included in the seap , with a view to guiding the relevant authorities in the implementation; ### 2. believes , however , that concrete strategies and follow-up measures for achieving each objective need to be laid out and the interlinkages between measures further detailed; considers it necessary to establish a calendar for all actions included in the seap , with a view to guiding the relevant authorities in the implementation;


### 3. urges the commission and the member states , as well as regional and local authorities , to mainstream the social economy dimension in relevant policies , programmes and practices; ### 3. underlines that despite being a considerable source of economic growth and job creation , more needs to be done to promote the social economy; urges therefore the commission and the member states , as well as regional and local authorities , to mainstream the social economy dimension in relevant policies , programmes and practices;


### 4. reiterates its call13 for the ‘think small first’ principle to be set as a guiding principle in the drafting of future legislation and the adoption of policies , so as to make the union’s ecosystem more competitive and supportive of micro , small and medium-sized organisations both within and outside the social economy; ### 4. stresses the need to keep the ‘think small first’ principle in mind when drafting legislation and policies , without weakening environmental and consumer protection , workers’ rights as well as health and safety provisions , and to better support micro , small and medium-sized enterprises both within and outside the social economy in applying existing rules and regulations;


### 4. reiterates its call13 for the ‘think small first’ principle to be set as a guiding principle in the drafting of future legislation and the adoption of policies , so as to make the union’s ecosystem more competitive and supportive of micro , small and medium-sized organisations both within and outside the social economy; ### 4. reiterates its call13 for the ‘think small first’ principle to be set as a guiding principle in the drafting of future legislation and the adoption of policies , so as to make the union’s ecosystem more competitive and supportive of micro , small and medium-sized organisations both within and outside the social economy and ensure that its role is strengthened to support the development of social economy;


### 5. reminds the member states that the public procurement directive (directive 2014/24/eu) allows contracting authorities to use public procurement to pursue environmental and social objectives , and , in particular , allows for reserved tender procedures for organisations whose main aim is the integration of persons with disabilities or other disadvantaged groups into the workforce; invites public authorities to consider socially and environmentally responsible public procurement as an investment in the socio-economic fabric with a great potential to combine social and competitive objectives; ### 5. reminds the member states that the public procurement directive (directive 2014/24/eu) allows contracting authorities to use public procurement to pursue environmental and social objectives , and , in particular , allows for reserved tender procedures for organisations whose main aim is the integration of persons with disabilities or other disadvantaged groups into the workforce; calls on public authorities to consider socially and environmentally responsible public procurement as an socio-economic investment which combines social and economic objectives; calls on the commission to further promote socially responsible public procurement as a key tool to achieve employment and to promote socially responsible business practices; stresses that all public funding , including through public procurement contracts , should be subject to social and environmental conditionality;


### 5. reminds the member states that the public procurement directive (directive 2014/24/eu) allows contracting authorities to use public procurement to pursue environmental and social objectives , and , in particular , allows for reserved tender procedures for organisations whose main aim is the integration of persons with disabilities or other disadvantaged groups into the workforce; invites public authorities to consider socially and environmentally responsible public procurement as an investment in the socio-economic fabric with a great potential to combine social and competitive objectives; ### 5. reminds the member states that the public procurement directive (directive 2014/24/eu) allows contracting authorities to use public procurement to pursue environmental and social objectives , and , in particular , allows for reserved tender procedures for organisations whose main aim is the integration of persons with disabilities or other disadvantaged groups into the workforce; invites public authorities to recognise socially and environmentally responsible public procurement as an investment in the socio-economic fabric with a great potential to combine social and competitive objectives;


### 6. encourages the member states to systematically adopt strategies aimed at developing socially responsible public procurement , thus establishing a link across policy areas between the delivery of services and products and the contribution to social objectives; considers that the transposition of the public procurement directive must be coupled with initiatives to increase knowledge about the relationship between public spending and its contribution to achieving the sdgs , and to build capacity among public procurement officers and social economy organisations; encourages public procurement officers to carry out pre-market consultations before drawing up tender documents , with a view to better understanding the existing needs and how social economy organisations could meet them; ### 6. encourages the member states to systematically adopt strategies aimed at developing socially responsible public procurement , thus establishing a link across policy areas between the delivery of services and products and the contribution to social objectives; considers that the transposition of the public procurement directive must be coupled with initiatives to increase knowledge about the relationship between public spending and its contribution to achieving the sdgs , and to build capacity among public procurement officers and social economy organisations; encourages public procurement officers to carry out pre-market consultations before drawing up tender documents , with a view to better understanding what social economy organisations have to offer;


### 7. welcomes existing initiatives in member states to provide workers interested in the buyout process and cooperatives emerging from workers’ buyouts with legal counselling , financial support , support in the preparation of business plans , data needed for external investors and business support structures; encourages member states to include this topic in the 2023 council recommendations in order to further support these initiatives at regional and national level; ### 7. welcomes existing initiatives in member states to provide workers interested in the buyout process and cooperatives emerging from workers’ buyouts with legal counselling , financial support , support in the preparation of business plans , data needed for external investors and business support structures; encourages member states to include this topic in the 2023 council recommendations in order to further support these initiatives at regional and national level and to work closely with workers' representatives to support and link up with the federations of worker cooperatives in assisting workers’ buyouts ; also urges the commission to keep on working closely with the member states to identify tools and solutions to remove obstacles and speed up legal procedures to transfer the ownership of an enterprise after its closure to the employees through worker cooperatives or other forms of worker-owned social economy enterprises; invites the member states to share and exchange best practices in this regard;


### 7. welcomes existing initiatives in member states to provide workers interested in the buyout process and cooperatives emerging from workers’ buyouts with legal counselling , financial support , support in the preparation of business plans , data needed for external investors and business support structures; encourages member states to include this topic in the 2023 council recommendations in order to further support these initiatives at regional and national level; ### 7. welcomes existing initiatives in member states to provide workers interested in the buyout process and cooperatives emerging from workers’ buyouts with business support structures , including legal counselling , financial support and help to create business plans; underlines the important role of trade unions and collaboration between trade unions and social economy organisations in order to enhance the chances of successful workers’ buyouts , which preserves jobs , and contributes to innovation and the democratisation of the economy; encourages member states to include workers’ buyouts in the 2023 council recommendation in order to further support these initiatives at national and regional level;


### 8. welcomes the announced report on the possible extension of the eu taxonomy for sustainable finance to social objectives; considers that the eu taxonomy needs to cover social factors , without creating an excessively disproportionate burden on businesses , as it can be a driver for investment in the field of the social economy; ### 8. welcomes the announced report on the possible extension of the eu taxonomy for sustainable finance to social objectives; considers that the eu taxonomy needs to cover social factors , as it can be a driver for investment in the field of the social economy;


### 9. calls on the commission and the member states to set up capacity-building partnerships and formal agreements with social economy networks in order to provide social economy organisations with advisory services such as tailor-made mentoring and coaching , financing capacity-building , training and education , incubating services and networking for capacity-building; ### 9. calls on the commission and the member states to set up capacity-building partnerships and formal agreements with social economy networks in order to provide social economy organisations with advisory services such as tailor-made mentoring and coaching , financing capacity-building , training and education , incubating services and networking for capacity-building; in this regard , brings to the attention of regional and local authorities committed to initiating or upgrading their capacity building measures for the social economy the guidelines for local governments on policies for social and solidarity economy published by the united nations research institute for social development in 2021;


### 9. calls on the commission and the member states to set up capacity-building partnerships and formal agreements with social economy networks in order to provide social economy organisations with advisory services such as tailor-made mentoring and coaching , financing capacity-building , training and education , incubating services and networking for capacity-building; ### 9. calls on the commission and the member states to set up national , transnational and interregional capacity-building partnerships and formal agreements with social economy networks and their representative organisations in order to provide social economy organisations with advisory services such as tailor-made mentoring and coaching , financing capacity-building , training and education , incubating services and networking for capacity-building; welcomes concrete projects such as the european business school on social economy promoted by the smart specialisation platform partnership on social economy , formed by six european regions and supported by european social economy networks;


### 9. calls on the commission and the member states to set up capacity-building partnerships and formal agreements with social economy networks in order to provide social economy organisations with advisory services such as tailor-made mentoring and coaching , financing capacity-building , training and education , incubating services and networking for capacity-building; ### 9. calls on the commission and the member states to set up capacity-building partnerships and formal agreements with social economy networks in order to allow exchange of experience and provide social economy organisations with advisory services such as tailor-made mentoring and coaching , financing capacity-building , training and education , incubating services and networking for capacity-building;


### 10. highlights the key role that new technologies can play in developing and scaling up social economy projects and the importance of giving social entrepreneurs priority access to training programmes on digital skills and advanced technologies , both at eu and national level , and calls on the commission and member states to explore how mainstream businesses and social economy organisations can cooperate in that regard; ### 10. highlights the key role that new technologies can play in developing and scaling up social economy projects; stresses the importance of giving social entrepreneurs priority access to training programmes on digital skills and advanced technologies , both at union and national level;


### 10. highlights the key role that new technologies can play in developing and scaling up social economy projects and the importance of giving social entrepreneurs priority access to training programmes on digital skills and advanced technologies , both at eu and national level , and calls on the commission and member states to explore how mainstream businesses and social economy organisations can cooperate in that regard; ### 10. highlights the key role that new technologies , if accessible to all , can play in developing and scaling up social economy , as well as the importance of giving social economy entrepreneurs enhanced access to training programmes on digital skills and advanced technologies , both at eu and national level , and calls on the commission and member states to explore how mainstream businesses and social economy organisations can cooperate in that regard;


### 11. considers it regrettable that social economy organisations do not feature to the same extent as more conventional businesses in the curricula of mainstream school education and higher education enterprise and business education14 ; in light of this , invites sector-representative bodies and relevant public authorities , in partnership with the relevant stakeholders , to review and evaluate the curricula and put forward policy recommendations for academic institutions; ### 11. regrets that social economy organisations do not feature to the same extent as more conventional businesses in the curricula of mainstream school education and higher education as well as vocational education and training14; suggests to review school and university curricula in this regard;


### 12. notes the possibilities offered under investeu to support the social economy; urges the commission and the implementing partners to design financial products tailored to the needs of social economy enterprises under the social investment and skills window and to allocate sufficient resources to these products; notes that sound eligibility criteria should be developed to target financial intermediaries that specifically support the social economy and considers that advisory services should be made available under the investeu advisory hub in order to maximise the potential of these financial intermediaries to tap into the investeu programme; calls on the commission to ensure that other investeu financial products such as those targeting smes are made accessible to social economy organisations , most of which are micro , small and medium-sized organisations; ### 12. notes the possibilities offered under investeu to support the social economy; urges the commission and the implementing partners to design financial products tailored to the needs of social economy enterprises under the social investment and skills window and to allocate sufficient resources to these products , including the creation of social bonds to stimulate social innovation and impact finance , that could be highly advantageous for the sector as a whole , with tangible impacts for the community; notes that sound eligibility criteria should be developed to target financial intermediaries that specifically support the social economy and considers that advisory services should be made available under the investeu advisory hub in order to maximise the potential of these financial intermediaries to tap into the investeu programme; calls on the commission to ensure that other investeu financial products such as those targeting smes are made accessible to social economy organisations , most of which are micro , small and medium-sized organisations;


### 13. invites the commission , on the occasion of the next revision of the general block exemption regulation (gber) , to adequately take into account the specific needs of social economy organisations in terms of access to finance and market development , to strengthen the role of state aid in promoting the recruitment of disadvantaged workers , especially in the context of the post-covid-19 recovery , and to explore different evidence-based options , after consulting relevant stakeholders , to support the development of social economy organisations; ### 13. invites the commission , on the occasion of the next revision of the general block exemption regulation (gber) , to adequately take into account the specific needs of social economy organisations in terms of access to finance and market development , to better include social considerations such as promoting the recruitment of disadvantaged workers in state aid decisions , especially in the context of the post-covid-19 recovery , and to explore different evidence-based options , after consulting relevant stakeholders , to support the development of social economy organisations;


### 15. strongly welcomes the proposal of a council recommendation on social economy framework conditions to be approved in 2023; believes that it should serve as a compass to strengthen the social economy legal and policy frameworks , especially in member states where the social economy ecosystem is less developed , and should clearly highlight the support instruments made available by the eu and provide guidance in relation to specific policies such as public procurement , employment and social policies , taxation , education , skills and training and the importance of linking the circular economy and the social economy agendas; ### 15. strongly welcomes the proposal of a council recommendation on social economy framework conditions to be approved in 2023; believes that it should provide a common definition of the social economy based on its principles and features -as per the seap- , a definition that , taking into consideration the diversity of the social economy , applies to all policies , programmes and measures that the european commission develops and operates for the social economy7a ,as it would also ensure that support measures are granted to all social economy organisations and enterprises; notes that the council recommendation should serve as a compass to strengthen the social economy legal and policy frameworks , especially in member states where the social economy ecosystem is less developed , and should clearly highlight the support instruments made available by the eu and provide guidance in relation to specific policies such as public procurement , employment and social policies , taxation , education , skills and training and the importance of linking the circular economy and the social economy agendas;


### 15. strongly welcomes the proposal of a council recommendation on social economy framework conditions to be approved in 2023; believes that it should serve as a compass to strengthen the social economy legal and policy frameworks , especially in member states where the social economy ecosystem is less developed , and should clearly highlight the support instruments made available by the eu and provide guidance in relation to specific policies such as public procurement , employment and social policies , taxation , education , skills and training and the importance of linking the circular economy and the social economy agendas; ### 15. strongly welcomes the proposal of a council recommendation on social economy framework conditions to be approved in 2023 and calls for the full involvement of the european parliament in this regard to make it joint recommendation of both institutions; stresses that the recommendation should serve as a compass to strengthen the social economy legal and policy frameworks , especially in member states where the social economy ecosystem is less developed , and should clearly highlight the support instruments made available by the eu and provide guidance in relation to specific policies such as public procurement , state aid , employment and social policies , taxation , education , skills and training and the importance of linking the circular economy and the social economy agendas;


### 15. strongly welcomes the proposal of a council recommendation on social economy framework conditions to be approved in 2023; believes that it should serve as a compass to strengthen the social economy legal and policy frameworks , especially in member states where the social economy ecosystem is less developed , and should clearly highlight the support instruments made available by the eu and provide guidance in relation to specific policies such as public procurement , employment and social policies , taxation , education , skills and training and the importance of linking the circular economy and the social economy agendas; ### 15. strongly welcomes the proposal of a council recommendation on social economy framework conditions to be approved in 2023; believes that it should serve as a compass to strengthen the social economy legal and policy frameworks , especially in member states where the social economy ecosystem is less developed , and should clearly highlight the support instruments made available by the eu and provide guidance in relation to specific policies such as public procurement , state aid , employment and social policies , taxation , education , social and care services , skills and training and the importance of linking the circular economy and the social economy agendas;


### 16. considers it regrettable that parliament’s past calls on the commission to submit proposals allowing mutual societies , associations and foundations to act on a european and cross-border scale did not lead to any legislative changes , thus undermining the european social model and hindering the completion of the single market; suggests , in view of the window of opportunity opened by the seap , as well as the activities of the monitoring committee of the luxembourg declaration , which comprises a majority of member states , that enhanced cooperation be explored as a tool to overcome the aforementioned decades-long deadlocks; ### 16. regrets that parliament’s past calls on the commission to submit proposals allowing mutual societies , associations and foundations to act on a european and cross-border scale did not lead to any legislative changes , thus undermining the european social model and hindering the completion of the single market; reiterates the parliament’s call to introduce common minimum standards for non-profit organisations throughout the eu and establish a statute for a european association; suggests , in view of the window of opportunity opened by the seap , as well as the activities of the monitoring committee of the luxembourg declaration , which comprises a majority of member states , that enhanced cooperation be explored as a tool to overcome the aforementioned decades-long deadlocks;


### 16. considers it regrettable that parliament’s past calls on the commission to submit proposals allowing mutual societies , associations and foundations to act on a european and cross-border scale did not lead to any legislative changes , thus undermining the european social model and hindering the completion of the single market; suggests , in view of the window of opportunity opened by the seap , as well as the activities of the monitoring committee of the luxembourg declaration , which comprises a majority of member states , that enhanced cooperation be explored as a tool to overcome the aforementioned decades-long deadlocks; ### 16. considers it regrettable that parliament’s past calls on the commission to submit proposals allowing mutual societies , associations9a and foundations to act on a european and cross-border scale did not lead to any legislative changes , thus undermining the european social model and hindering the completion of the single market; suggests , in view of the window of opportunity opened by the seap , as well as the activities of the monitoring committee of the luxembourg declaration , which comprises a majority of member states , that enhanced cooperation be explored as a tool to overcome the aforementioned decades-long deadlocks;


### 17. notes that the full potential of the social economy sector for addressing socio-economic challenges requires a clear identification of social priorities by public authorities; highlights that social economy projects do generally require a close partnership with public entities , and calls therefore on the commission and member states to develop , within the macro-economic governance framework provided at eu level , a social investment strategy where social priorities are clearly identified and which can provide a framework for cooperation between public authorities and social economy organisations; ### 17. notes that the full potential of the social economy sector for addressing socio-economic challenges requires a clear identification of social priorities by public authorities; highlights that social economy projects do often require a close partnership with public entities , and calls therefore on the commission and member states to develop , within the macro-economic governance framework provided at eu level , a social investment strategy where social priorities are clearly identified and which can provide a framework for cooperation between public authorities and social economy organisations;


### 18. welcomes the announced launch of a new study to collect qualitative and quantitative information on the social economy across all member states; notes that detailed , standardised , comparable and reliable data on the scale and impact of the social economy need to be generated with a view to facilitating evidence-based policy decisions , future-proofing the development of the social economy and contributing to eu economic and social goals; ### 18. welcomes the announced launch of a new study to collect qualitative and quantitative information on the social economy across all member states; notes that detailed , standardised , comparable and reliable data on the scale and impact of the social economy need to be generated with a view to facilitating evidence-based policy decisions , future-proofing the development of the social economy and contributing to eu economic and social goals; calls in this respect on the commission and the member states to work with eurostat with a view to promote the development of standardised data , allowing robust analysis and trends in the social economy;


### 18. welcomes the announced launch of a new study to collect qualitative and quantitative information on the social economy across all member states; notes that detailed , standardised , comparable and reliable data on the scale and impact of the social economy need to be generated with a view to facilitating evidence-based policy decisions , future-proofing the development of the social economy and contributing to eu economic and social goals; ### 18. welcomes the announced launch of a new study to collect qualitative and quantitative information on the social economy across all member states; notes that detailed , standardised , comparable and reliable data on the scale and impact of the social economy need to be generated with a view to facilitating evidence-based policy decisions , future-proofing the development of the social economy and contributing to eu economic and social goals; reminds the member states of the 2015 council conclusions’ invitation for national statistical authorities to develop and implement social economy satellite accounts;


### 19. calls on the member states to designate social economy coordinators and to set up local social economy contact points with a view to facilitating access to funding , including eu funding; ### 19. calls on the member states to designate social economy coordinators and to set up local social economy contact points with a view to facilitating access to funding , including eu funding; invites the commission and the social economy organisations to also use the announced social economy gateway to raise awareness of the funding opportunities at eu level; calls on the member states to properly and effectively implement the seap in collaboration with the social economy stakeholders;


### 19. calls on the member states to designate social economy coordinators and to set up local social economy contact points with a view to facilitating access to funding , including eu funding; ### 19. calls on the member states to designate social economy coordinators and to set up local social economy contact points with a view to facilitating access to support and funding , including eu funding;


### (4) member states should give effect to the provisions of this directive without discrimination on the basis of sex , race , colour , ethnic or social origin , genetic characteristics , language , religion or beliefs , political or other opinions , membership of a national minority , fortune , birth , disabilities , age or sexual orientation. ### (4) does not apply to english version.


### (11) to acquire eu long-term resident status , third-country nationals should prove that they have adequate resources and sickness insurance , to avoid becoming a burden for the member state. member states may indicate a certain sum as a reference amount , but they may not impose a minimum income level below which all applications for eu long-term resident status will be refused , irrespective of an actual examination of the situation of each applicant. when making an assessment of the possession of stable and regular resources , member states may take into account factors such as contributions to the pension system and fulfilment of tax obligations. the concept of ‘resources’ should not concern solely the ‘own resources’ of the applicant for eu long-term resident status , but may also cover the resources made available to that applicant by a third party provided that , in the light of the individual circumstances of the applicant concerned , they are considered to be stable , regular and sufficient. ### (11) to acquire eu long-term resident status , third-country nationals should prove that they have adequate resources and sickness insurance , to avoid becoming a burden for the member state. member states may indicate a certain sum as a reference amount , but they may not impose a minimum income level below which all applications for eu long-term resident status will be refused , irrespective of an actual examination of the situation of each applicant. when making an assessment of the possession of stable and regular resources , member states may take into account factors such as fulfilment of tax obligations. the concept of ‘resources’ should not concern solely the ‘own resources’ of the applicant for eu long-term resident status , but may also cover the resources made available to that applicant by a third party provided that , in the light of the individual circumstances of the applicant concerned , they are considered to be stable , regular and sufficient.


### (12) member states should be able to require applicants for eu long-term resident status to comply with integration conditions , for example by requiring them to pass a civic integration or language examination. however , the means for implementing this requirement should not be liable to jeopardise the objective of promoting the integration of third-country nationals , having regard , in particular , to the level of knowledge required to pass a civic integration examination , to the accessibility of the courses and material necessary to prepare for that examination , to the amount of fees applicable to third-country nationals as registration fees to sit that examination , or to the consideration of specific individual circumstances , such as age , illiteracy or level of education. ### (12) member states should be able to require applicants for eu long-term resident status to comply with proportionate , reasonable and of public interest integration conditions. however , the means for implementing this requirement should not be liable to jeopardise the objective of promoting the integration of third-country nationals , having regard , in particular , to the level of knowledge required to pass a civic integration examination , to the accessibility of the courses and material necessary to prepare for that examination , to the amount of fees applicable to third-country nationals as registration fees to sit that examination , or to the consideration of specific individual circumstances , such as age , illiteracy or level of education.


### (20) professional qualifications acquired by a third-country national in another member state should be recognised in the same way as those of union citizens. qualifications acquired in a third country should be taken into account in accordance with directive 2005/36/ec of the european parliament and of the council35 . this directive should be without prejudice to the conditions set out under national law for the exercise of regulated professions. ### (20) professional and occupational diplomas , certificates and other qualifications as well as skills and competences acquired by a third-country national in another member state should be recognised in the same way as those of union citizens. qualifications acquired in a third country should be taken into account in accordance with directive 2005/36/ec of the european parliament and of the council35 . this directive should be without prejudice to the conditions set out under national law for the exercise of regulated professions.


### (20) professional qualifications acquired by a third-country national in another member state should be recognised in the same way as those of union citizens. qualifications acquired in a third country should be taken into account in accordance with directive 2005/36/ec of the european parliament and of the council35. this directive should be without prejudice to the conditions set out under national law for the exercise of regulated professions. ### (20) academic and professional qualifications acquired by a third-country national in another member state should be recognised in the same way as those of union citizens. academic and other qualifications acquired in a third country should be taken into account in accordance with directive 2005/36/ec of the european parliament and of the council . this directive should be without prejudice to the conditions set out under national law for the exercise of regulated professions.


### (24) where a member state intends to end the legal stay , on a ground provided for in this directive , of a beneficiary of international protection who has acquired eu long-term resident status in that member state , and refoule him/her , that person should enjoy the protection against refoulement guaranteed under directive 2011/95/eu and under article 33 of the geneva convention. for that purpose , where the person enjoys international protection in a member state other than the one in which that person is currently residing as a long-term resident , it is necessary to provide , unless refoulement is permitted under directive 2011/95/eu , that that person may be required to go only to the member state which granted international protection and that that member state is obliged to take back that person. the same safeguards should apply to a beneficiary of international protection who has taken up residence but has not yet obtained eu long-term resident status in a second member state. ### deleted


### (25) where the refoulement of a beneficiary of international protection outside the territory of the union is permitted under directive 2011/95/eu member states should be obliged to ensure that all information is obtained from relevant sources , including , where appropriate , from the member state that granted international protection , and that it is thoroughly assessed with a view to guaranteeing that the decision to refoule that beneficiary is in accordance with article 4 and article 19(2) of the charter of fundamental rights of the european union. ### deleted


### (26) in order to promote better integration of eu long-term residents , rules on favourable conditions for family reunification and access to work for spouses should be introduced. thus specific derogations from council directive 2003/86/ec should be provided for. family reunification should not be subject to conditions relating to integration , as eu long-term residents and their families are deemed to be integrated in the host society. ### (26) in order to promote better integration of eu long-term residents , rules on favourable conditions for family reunification and access to work for family members irrespective of their sex , gender identity , gender expression or sexual characteristics should be introduced. thus specific derogations from council directive 2003/86/ec should be provided for. family reunification should not be subject to conditions relating to integration , as eu long-term residents and their families are deemed to be integrated in the host society. in order to enhance the integration of family members of eu long term residents , the residence permit for their children should be interconnected to their residence permit. the access to the eu long term resident status for children of an eu long term resident should be automatic without any other specific conditions and/or requirements.


### (26) in order to promote better integration of eu long-term residents , rules on favourable conditions for family reunification and access to work for spouses should be introduced. thus specific derogations from council directive 2003/86/ec should be provided for. family reunification should not be subject to conditions relating to integration , as eu long-term residents and their families are deemed to be integrated in the host society. ### (26) in order to promote better integration of eu long-term residents , rules on favourable conditions for family reunification and access to work for spouses should be introduced , thereby guaranteeing rights equal to those of a citizen of the union. thus specific derogations from council directive 2003/86/ec should be provided for. family reunification should not be subject to conditions relating to integration , as eu long-term residents and their families are deemed to be integrated in the host society.


### (27) as family life should be respected and its protection is an essential element of the integration of eu long-term residents , children of eu long-term residents who are born or adopted in the territory of the eu member state having issued to the latter the eu long-term residence permit should acquire the eu long-term resident status in that member state automatically , in particular without being subject to the requirement of prior residence. ### deleted


### (29) member states should ensure a level playing field between eu long-term residence permits and national residence permits of permanent or unlimited validity , in terms of procedural and equal treatment rights , procedures and access to information. in particular , member states should ensure that the level of procedural safeguards and rights granted to eu long-term residents and their family members is not lower than the level of procedural safeguards and rights enjoyed by holders of national residence permits of permanent or unlimited validity. member states should also ensure that applicants for an eu long-term residence permit are not required to pay higher fees for the processing of their application than applicants for national residence permits. finally , member states should engage in the same level of information , promotion and advertisement activities with respect to the eu long-term residence permit as they do for national residence permits of permanent or unlimited validity , for example with regard to information on national websites on legal migration and information campaigns , and training programmes provided to the competent migration authorities. ### (29) member states should ensure a level playing field between eu long-term residence permits and national residence permits of permanent or unlimited validity , in terms of procedural and equal treatment rights , procedures and access to information. in particular , member states should ensure that the level of procedural safeguards and rights granted to eu long-term residents and their family members is not lower than the level of procedural safeguards and rights enjoyed by holders of national residence permits of permanent or unlimited validity. member states should also ensure that applicants for an eu long-term residence permit are not required to pay higher fees for the processing of their application than applicants for national residence permits. finally , member states should engage in the same level of information , promotion and advertisement activities with respect to the eu long-term residence permit as they do for national residence permits of permanent or unlimited validity , for example with regard to information on national websites on legal migration and information campaigns , and training programmes provided to the competent migration authorities. all the information on the procedure to obtain the status on eu long term residence should be available in languages the third-country national can understand and should be accessible for persons with disabilities.