### 6. regrets the current lack of understanding between the eu and turkey , but reaffirms its firm conviction that turkey is a strategic neighbour and ally with which the eu wishes to have the best possible relations; ### 6. regrets the current lack of understanding between the eu and turkey , but reaffirms its firm conviction that the eu has a strategic interest in a stable and secure environment in the eastern mediterranean and in the development of a cooperative and mutually beneficial relationship with turkey with which the eu wishes to have the best possible relations; pursuing dialogue in good faith and abstaining from unilateral actions which run counter to the eu interests and violate international law , the sovereignty and the sovereign rights of eu member states is an absolute requirement in this regard;


### 6. regrets the current lack of understanding between the eu and turkey , but reaffirms its firm conviction that turkey is a strategic neighbour and ally with which the eu wishes to have the best possible relations; ### 6. regrets the current lack of understanding between the eu and turkey , but reaffirms its firm conviction that the eu has a strategic interest in a stable and secure environment in the eastern mediterranean and in the development of a cooperative and mutually beneficial relationship with turkey with which the eu should build the best possible relations; pursuing dialogue in good faith and abstaining from unilateral actions which run counter to the eu interests and violate international law , the sovereignty and the sovereign rights of eu member states is an absolute requirement in this regard;


### 6. regrets the current lack of understanding between the eu and turkey , but reaffirms its firm conviction that turkey is a strategic neighbour and ally with which the eu wishes to have the best possible relations; ### 6. regrets the current state of play of relations between the eu and turkey , but reaffirms that turkey is a strategic neighbour , key for the stability of the wider region , and ally with which the eu wishes to have the best possible relations , including within nato; is deeply concerned about turkey's current destabilising role in the wider region through its involvement in several conflicts;


### 7. expresses its will to strengthen and deepen mutual knowledge and understanding between turkish and european societies , combating all manifestations of social , religious or cultural prejudice; expresses its full commitment to continue supporting turkey’s independent civil society in whatever circumstances and framework of relations that the future may bring; believes , nevertheless , that the accession process would still be the most powerful tool to exercise normative pressure on the turkish government and the best framework to sustain the democratic and pro-european aspirations of turkish society; stresses that a purely transactional relationship will hardly contribute to the advancement of turkey towards a more democratic model; ### 7. expresses its will to strengthen and deepen mutual knowledge and understanding between turkish and european societies , combating all manifestations of social , religious or cultural prejudice; expresses its full commitment to continue supporting turkey’s independent civil society in whatever circumstances and framework of relations that the future may bring; believes , nevertheless , that the accession process is a powerful tool to exercise normative pressure on the turkish government and the best framework to sustain the democratic and pro-european aspirations of turkish society; recognises however that the advancement of turkey towards a more democratic model will require political will at the highest political level;


### 8. is appalled by the serious backsliding on fundamental freedoms revealing the dire human rights situation in turkey and the continued erosion of democracy and the rule of law; ### 8. is deeply concerned by the serious backsliding on fundamental freedoms revealing the dire human rights situation in turkey and the continued erosion of democracy and the rule of law;


### 9. believes that this fundamental area , which is at the core of the accession process , cannot be disconnected and isolated from overall relations and that it remains the main obstacle to progress on any positive agenda that could be offered to turkey; ### 9. believes that this fundamental area , which is at the core of the accession process , cannot be disconnected and isolated from overall relations and that it remains along with the full respect of international law and the fundamental principle of good neighbourly relations and regional cooperation , the main obstacles to progress on any positive agenda that could be offered to turkey;


### 10. notes with deep concern that , despite the formal lifting of the state of emergency in july 2018 , its impact on democracy and fundamental rights continues to be strongly felt; ### 10. notes with deep concern that , despite the formal lifting of the state of emergency in july 2018 , its impact on democracy and fundamental rights continues to be strongly felt , including the arbitrary passport cancellations of citizens and the profiling by the authorities of dismissed public sector workers; underlines that the lack of institutional independence , the lengthy review procedures , the absence of sufficiently individualised criteria , and the absence of a proper means of defence cast serious doubt over the inquiry commission on the state of emergency measures’ ability to provide an effective remedy against dismissals;


### 10. notes with deep concern that , despite the formal lifting of the state of emergency in july 2018 , its impact on democracy and fundamental rights continues to be strongly felt; ### 10. notes with deep concern that , despite the formal lifting of the state of emergency in july 2018 , its impact on democracy and fundamental rights continues to be strongly felt , as , inter alia , a plethora of legal provisions and restrictive elements of the emergency rule have been integrated into law


### 10. notes with deep concern that , despite the formal lifting of the state of emergency in july 2018 , its impact on democracy and fundamental rights continues to be strongly felt; ### 10. notes with deep concern that , despite the formal lifting of the state of emergency in july 2018 , its impact on democracy and fundamental rights continues to be strongly felt , most recently with the mass sentencing on november 26 of 337 people to life imprisonment for taking part in the failed coup in 2016;


### 10. notes with deep concern that , despite the formal lifting of the state of emergency in july 2018 , its impact on democracy and fundamental rights continues to be strongly felt; ### 10. notes with deep concern that , despite the formal lifting of the state of emergency in july 2018 , its impact on democracy and fundamental rights continues to be strongly felt , as , inter alia , that a plethora of legal provisions and restrictive elements of the emergency rule have been integrated into law.


### 11. deeply regrets that this repressive form of rule has now become a deliberate , relentless , systematic state policy , which extends to any critical activities , such as kurdish activism , or even to events that took place prior to the attempted coup , such as the gezi protests; ### 11. deeply regrets that this repressive form of rule has now become a deliberate , relentless , systematic state policy , which targets the alleged participants of the gülen movement and extends to any critical activities , such as kurdish activism and peaceful demonstrations by victims of the state of emergency such as cemal yıldırım and melek çetinkaya and women activists , or even to events that took place prior to the attempted coup , such as the gezi protests;


### 11. deeply regrets that this repressive form of rule has now become a deliberate , relentless , systematic state policy , which extends to any critical activities , such as kurdish activism , or even to events that took place prior to the attempted coup , such as the gezi protests; ### 11. deeply regrets that this repressive form of rule has now become the state policy , which extends to any critical activities , or even to events that took place prior to the attempted coup , such as the gezi protests;


### 13. considers that the erosion of the rule of law and the systemic lack of independence of the judiciary continues to be one of the most pressing and worrying issues; condemns the increased surveillance by the executive and the political pressure affecting the work of judges , prosecutors , lawyers and bar associations; ### 13. considers that the erosion of the rule of law and the systemic lack of independence of the judiciary continues to be one of the most pressing and worrying issues; condemns the increased surveillance by the executive and the political pressure affecting the work of judges , prosecutors , lawyers and bar associations; is appalled by the mass arrest and prosecution of lawyers for representing their clients; is concerned about the legislative amendment allowing for the division of bar associations along political lines in a way to diminish their role as human rights watchdogs;


### 14. is deeply worried about the disregard by the turkish judiciary of european court of human rights (ecthr) rulings and the increasing non-compliance of lower courts with the judgments of the constitutional court; ### 14. is deeply worried about the disregard by the turkish judiciary of european court of human rights (ecthr) rulings and the increasing non-compliance of lower courts with the judgments of the constitutional court; recognises that there have been instances where turkey has requested the re-trial of its prisoners following a decision by the ecthr however , notes with regret that these retrials often fail to meet internationally recognised standards for a fair trial , such as in the ilhan sami comak case;


### 14. is deeply worried about the disregard by the turkish judiciary of european court of human rights (ecthr) rulings and the increasing non-compliance of lower courts with the judgments of the constitutional court; ### 14. is deeply worried about the disregard by the turkish judiciary of the european court of human rights (ecthr) rulings and decisions adopted by un mechanisms such as the un human rights committee and working group on arbitrary detention and the increasing non-compliance of lower courts with the judgments of the constitutional court; is appalled by the constitutional court’s yıldırım turan judgment which clearly contradicts article 46 of the european convention of human rights;


### 14. is deeply worried about the disregard by the turkish judiciary of european court of human rights (ecthr) rulings and the increasing non-compliance of lower courts with the judgments of the constitutional court; ### 14. is deeply worried about the disregard by the turkish judiciary of european court of human rights (ecthr) rulings and decisions adopted by un mechanisms such as the un human rights committee and working group on arbitrary detention and the increasing non-compliance of lower courts with the judgments of the constitutional court;


### 15. expresses serious concern about the disproportionate and arbitrary measures curtailing freedom of expression , media freedom and access to information; urges turkey to guarantee media freedom as a matter of priority; ### 15. expresses serious concern about the disproportionate and arbitrary measures curtailing freedom of expression , media freedom and access to information; condemns the imprisonment of journalists , media employees as well as social media users; notes with deep concern the increasing restrictions and censorship imposed on social media platforms; urges turkey to guarantee media freedom as a matter of priority;


### 16. is deeply concerned about the constant attacks and pressure on the opposition parties , which undermines the proper functioning of a democratic system; ### 16. is deeply concerned about the constant attacks and pressure on the opposition parties and sentencing of members of the opposition , which undermines the proper functioning of a democratic system;


### 17. notes with great concern the way that the people’s democratic party (hdp) has been specifically and continuously targeted by the turkish authorities; strongly condemns the continued detention of former hdp co-chair selahattin demirtaş; ### 17. notes with great concern the way that the people’s democratic party (hdp) has been specifically and continuously targeted by the turkish authorities; strongly condemns the continued detention of former hdp co-chair selahattin demirtaş; ; is appalled by the rise in hate crimes against citizens of kurdish origin;


### 18. calls on turkey to release all imprisoned human rights defenders , journalists , lawyers , academics and others who have been detained on unsubstantiated charges and to enable them to carry out their work without threat or impediment in all circumstances; strongly condemns the re-arrest and continued detention of osman kavala , a prominent civil society figure; ### 18. calls on the turkish government to release all imprisoned human rights defenders , journalists , lawyers , academics and others who have been detained on unsubstantiated charges and to enable them to carry out their work without threat or impediment in all circumstances; strongly condemns the re-arrest and continued detention of osman kavala , a prominent civil society figure; is appalled by the tragic death of human rights lawyer ebru timtik after 238 days of hunger strike at protest of her unfair trial after being convicted of membership of a terrorist organisation;


### 18. calls on turkey to release all imprisoned human rights defenders , journalists , lawyers , academics and others who have been detained on unsubstantiated charges and to enable them to carry out their work without threat or impediment in all circumstances; strongly condemns the re-arrest and continued detention of osman kavala , a prominent civil society figure; ### 18. calls on the turkish government to release all imprisoned human rights defenders , journalists , lawyers , academics and others who have been detained on unsubstantiated charges and to enable them to carry out their work without threat or impediment in all circumstances; strongly condemns the re-arrest and continued detention of osman kavala , a prominent civil society figure;


### 21. urges turkey to protect the rights of minorities and vulnerable groups , including women , lgbti people and ethnic and religious minorities; ### 21. urges turkey to protect the rights of minorities and vulnerable groups , including women , lgbti people and ethnic and religious minorities; condemns the pervasive hate-speech against lgbti people , especially when done by high-level political and religious figures; condemns the lack of proper investigation , prosecution and sanction of hate speech , both online and offline , and of hate crime; calls on authorities and officials to firmly condemn all acts of violence and hate speech against minorities and vulnerable groups and to investigate and prosecute them effectively;


### 21. urges turkey to protect the rights of minorities and vulnerable groups , including women , lgbti people and ethnic and religious minorities; ### 21. urges the turkish government to protect the rights of minorities and vulnerable groups , including women , lgbti people and ethnic and religious minorities and to take further measures to end violence against women and the deplorable practice of so called “honour killings”; calls on turkey to fully implement and abide by the istanbul convention to which it has signed up;


### 21. urges turkey to protect the rights of minorities and vulnerable groups , including women , lgbti people and ethnic and religious minorities; ### 21. urges turkey to protect the rights of minorities and vulnerable groups , including women , lgbti people , ethnic and religious minorities and refugees who have been increasingly targeted by racist attacks;


### 21. urges turkey to protect the rights of minorities and vulnerable groups , including women , lgbti people and ethnic and religious minorities; ### 21. urges the turkish government to protect the rights of minorities and vulnerable groups , including women , lgbti people and ethnic and religious minorities;


### 23. is concerned about the ever more frequent use of a hyper-nationalist narrative among the ruling elite that increasingly gives rise to antagonistic approaches towards the eu or its member states; is concerned about the increasing clout of religious conservatism in political life; ### 23. is concerned about the ever more frequent use of a hyper-nationalist and war- mongering narrative among the ruling elite that increasingly gives rise to antagonistic approaches towards the eu or its member states; is concerned about the increasing clout of religious conservatism in political life;


### 24. strongly condemns the removal of democratically elected mayors from office on the basis of questionable evidence and , in particular , their arbitrary replacement by unelected trustees appointed by the central government; strongly believes these unlawful decisions constitute a direct attack on the most basic principles of democracy , depriving millions of voters of their democratically elected representation; ### 24. strongly condemns the removal of democratically elected mayors from office on the basis of questionable evidence and , in particular , their arbitrary replacement by unelected trustees appointed by the central government; notes the political , legislative and administrative measures taken by the government to paralyze municipalities run by mayors of opposition parties in i̇stanbul , ankara , izmir and southeastern cities; strongly believes these unlawful decisions constitute a direct attack on the most basic principles of democracy , depriving millions of voters of their democratically elected representation;


### 24. strongly condemns the removal of democratically elected mayors from office on the basis of questionable evidence and , in particular , their arbitrary replacement by unelected trustees appointed by the central government; strongly believes these unlawful decisions constitute a direct attack on the most basic principles of democracy , depriving millions of voters of their democratically elected representation; ### 24. strongly condemns the removal of 47 democratically elected mayors from office on the basis of questionable evidence and , in particular , their arbitrary replacement by unelected trustees appointed by the central government; strongly believes these unlawful decisions constitute a direct attack on the most basic principles of democracy , depriving millions of voters of their democratically elected representation;


### 25. recalls the laudable role played by turkey in responding to the migration crisis resulting from the war in syria; takes the view that the eu should continue to give the necessary support to syrian refugees and host communities in turkey; supports an objective assessment of the eu-turkey statement and underlines the importance of both parties’ compliance with their respective commitments; ### 25. while recalling the substantial efforts turkey has made in responding to the refugee crisis resulting from the war in syria , the ep strongly rejects turkey's instrumentalisation of migratory pressure for political purposes that took place at the eu’s external borders in late february-march 2020; takes the view that the eu should continue to give the necessary support to syrian refugees and host communities in turkey in line with strict conditionality , including for respecting the principles of the united nations charter and international law , and monitoring mechanisms of turkey’s performance; underlines that turkey has to fully and effectively implement the provisions of both the 2016 eu – turkey statement and the eu – turkey readmission agreement with regard to all member states; supports the eu-turkey statement and underlines the importance of turkey’s compliance with its respective commitments;


### 25. recalls the laudable role played by turkey in responding to the migration crisis resulting from the war in syria; takes the view that the eu should continue to give the necessary support to syrian refugees and host communities in turkey; supports an objective assessment of the eu-turkey statement and underlines the importance of both parties’ compliance with their respective commitments; ### 25. ahead of the 10-year anniversary of the conflict in syria , commends the laudable role played by turkey in responding to the migration crisis resulting from the war in syria; acknowledges that turkey continues to host and provide social services for 3.6 million syrian refugees; takes the view that the eu should continue to give the necessary support to syrian refugees and host communities in turkey; supports an objective assessment of the eu-turkey statement and underlines the importance of both parties’ compliance with their respective commitments; recognizes the migratory pressure turkey is facing however , firmly objects to the turkish government using migrants as blackmail against the eu;


### 26. stresses that a modernisation of the customs union could be beneficial for both parties and would keep turkey economically and normatively anchored to the eu; reiterates that this would need to be based on strong conditionality related to human rights and fundamental freedoms; highlights that it seems unrealistic to envisage any modernisation of the customs union given the current circumstances; recalls that the current customs union will not achieve its full potential until turkey fully implements the additional protocol in relation to all member states; ### 26. stresses that a modernisation of the customs union could be beneficial for both parties and would keep turkey economically and normatively anchored to the eu; reiterates that this would need to be based on strong conditionality related to human rights fundamental freedoms and the full respect of international law and the fundamental principle of good neighbourly relations; highlights that it is unrealistic to envisage any modernisation of the customs union as long as turkey continues to move further away from the european union , in accordance with council conclusions of 26 june 2018 and 18 june 2019 recalls that the current customs union needs to be implemented by turkey in a full and non-discriminatory way; this is not the case as long as turkey has been systematically refusing to implement the additional protocol in relation to all member states and it has been systematically violating critical provisions of the current customs union; calls on turkey to eliminate immediately all the technical barriers , the localisation schemes and domestic requirements that discriminate against eu products and still prevent the free movement of goods in profound breach of the customs union obligations;


### 26. stresses that a modernisation of the customs union could be beneficial for both parties and would keep turkey economically and normatively anchored to the eu; reiterates that this would need to be based on strong conditionality related to human rights and fundamental freedoms; highlights that it seems unrealistic to envisage any modernisation of the customs union given the current circumstances; recalls that the current customs union will not achieve its full potential until turkey fully implements the additional protocol in relation to all member states; ### 26. stresses that a modernisation of the customs union could be beneficial for both parties and would keep turkey economically and normatively anchored to the eu; reiterates that this would need to be based on strong conditionality related to human rights and fundamental freedoms; recalls that the current customs union will not achieve its full potential until turkey fully implements the additional protocol in relation to all member states;


### 26. stresses that a modernisation of the customs union could be beneficial for both parties and would keep turkey economically and normatively anchored to the eu; reiterates that this would need to be based on strong conditionality related to human rights and fundamental freedoms; highlights that it seems unrealistic to envisage any modernisation of the customs union given the current circumstances; recalls that the current customs union will not achieve its full potential until turkey fully implements the additional protocol in relation to all member states; ### 26. stresses that a modernisation of the customs union would be beneficial for both parties and would keep turkey economically and normatively anchored to the eu; believes that a door should be left open for a modernisation of the customs union but stresses that would require a change of attitude and constructive efforts by the turkish government to improve overall relations and would need to be based on strong conditionality related to human rights and fundamental freedoms; recalls that the current customs union will not achieve its full potential until turkey fully implements the additional protocol in relation to all member states;


### 27. is deeply concerned by the ongoing dispute in the eastern mediterranean and the related risk of a military escalation; condemns turkey’s illegal activities in greek and cypriot waters , which violate both the sovereign rights of eu member states and international law; expresses its full solidarity with greece and the republic of cyprus; urges turkey to engage in the peaceful settlement of disputes and to refrain from any unilateral and illegal action or threat; ### 27. is deeply concerned by the ongoing turkey’s unprecedented illegal and aggressive behaviour in the eastern mediterranean and the aegean sea , its warmongering rhetoric and the related risk of a military escalation by an eu candidate country against eu member states ; strongly condemns turkey’s violations of greek national airspace , including over flights of inhabited areas , and territorial sea , a conduct which not only constitutes a serious , ongoing violation of international law , but also creates the risk of an armed incident ;strongly condemns turkey’s illegal activities in greek and cypriot waters , which violate the sovereignty , the sovereign rights of eu member states and international law; expresses its full solidarity with greece and the republic of cyprus; expresses its grave concern for the illegal turkish fishing activities within greek territorial waters in the aegean sea and the unregulated and unreported fishing activities of turkish fishing fleet in international waters in the aegean sea and the eastern mediterranean; urges turkey to fully respect international law and the law of the sea , to engage in the peaceful settlement of disputes and to refrain from any unilateral and illegal action or threat; notes that the council’s conclusions of 15 july 2019 in light of turkey’s continued and new illegal drilling activities , not to hold the association council and further meetings of the eu-turkey high-level dialogues for the time being , along with the council’s decision 2019/1894 , of11 november 2019 , to impose restrictive measures in view of turkey’s unauthorized drilling activities in the eastern mediterranean , are the first instances where such reactions were deemed necessary in view of the conduct of a candidate country;


### 27. is deeply concerned by the ongoing dispute in the eastern mediterranean and the related risk of a military escalation; condemns turkey’s illegal activities in greek and cypriot waters , which violate both the sovereign rights of eu member states and international law; expresses its full solidarity with greece and the republic of cyprus; urges turkey to engage in the peaceful settlement of disputes and to refrain from any unilateral and illegal action or threat; ### 27. is deeply concerned by the ongoing dispute in the eastern mediterranean and the related risk of a military escalation; urges all parties to actively support the negotiations for the fair , comprehensive and viable settlement on the dispute in the aegean sea and the cyprus problem within the un framework and in accordance with the eu’s founding principles and international law; firmly believes that the sustainable resolution of the cyprus problem would benefit every country in the region , foremost among which cyprus , greece and turkey , as well as the eu; underlines the importance of constructive engagement with the new turkish cypriot president ersin tatar , with the aim of reaching a comprehensive settlement and achieving reunification , security and stability on the island and in the region; deplores the greek cypriot rejection of the april 2004 un plan , accepted by the turkish cypriot community


### 27. is deeply concerned by the ongoing dispute in the eastern mediterranean and the related risk of a military escalation; condemns turkey’s illegal activities in greek and cypriot waters , which violate both the sovereign rights of eu member states and international law; expresses its full solidarity with greece and the republic of cyprus; urges turkey to engage in the peaceful settlement of disputes and to refrain from any unilateral and illegal action or threat; ### 27. is deeply concerned by the ongoing dispute in the eastern mediterranean and the related risk of a military escalation; strongly condemns turkey’s illegal activities in greek and cypriot waters , which violate both the sovereign rights of eu member states and international law; expresses its full solidarity with greece and the republic of cyprus; urges turkey to engage in the peaceful settlement of disputes and to refrain from any unilateral and illegal action or threat; recognises the right of the republic of cyprus to enter into bilateral agreements concerning its exclusive economic zone , explore and exploit its natural resources and calls on turkey to respect relevant international law (unclos); urges turkey to engage in the peaceful settlement of disputes , and to refrain from any threat or action which might have negative effects on good neighbourly relations. urges turkey to show restraint and to respect cyprus’ sovereignty over its territorial sea and cyprus’ sovereign rights in its exclusive economic zone.


### 27. is deeply concerned by the ongoing dispute in the eastern mediterranean and the related risk of a military escalation; condemns turkey’s illegal activities in greek and cypriot waters , which violate both the sovereign rights of eu member states and international law; expresses its full solidarity with greece and the republic of cyprus; urges turkey to engage in the peaceful settlement of disputes and to refrain from any unilateral and illegal action or threat; ### 27. is deeply concerned by the ongoing dispute in the eastern mediterranean and the related risk of a military escalation; condemns turkey’s illegal activities in greek and cypriot waters , which violate both the sovereign rights of eu member states and international law; expresses its full solidarity with greece and the republic of cyprus; urges turkey to engage in the peaceful settlement of disputes and to refrain from any unilateral and illegal action or threat; welcomes the proposal of the european council for a multilateral conference on the eastern mediterranean and calls on the high representative to launch it as soon as soon as possible;


### 27. is deeply concerned by the ongoing dispute in the eastern mediterranean and the related risk of a military escalation; condemns turkey’s illegal activities in greek and cypriot waters , which violate both the sovereign rights of eu member states and international law; expresses its full solidarity with greece and the republic of cyprus; urges turkey to engage in the peaceful settlement of disputes and to refrain from any unilateral and illegal action or threat; ### 27. is deeply concerned by the ongoing dispute in the eastern mediterranean and the related risk of a military escalation; strongly condemns turkey’s illegal activities in greek and cypriot waters , which violate both the sovereign rights of eu member states and international law; expresses its full solidarity with greece and the republic of cyprus; urges turkey to engage in the peaceful settlement of disputes and to refrain from any unilateral and illegal action or threat;


### 28. condemns the partial reopening of varosha beach , which undermines mutual trust and therefore the prospect of the resumption of direct talks on the comprehensive resolution of the cyprus issue; calls on turkey to reverse this action; reiterates its support for a fair , comprehensive and viable settlement on the basis of a bi-communal , bi-zonal federation with political equality; ### 28. condemns the partial reopening of varosha beach , which undermines mutual trust and therefore the prospect of the resumption of direct talks on the comprehensive resolution of the cyprus issue; calls on turkey to reverse this action; reiterates its support for a fair , comprehensive and viable settlement on the basis of a bi-communal , bi-zonal federation with political equality , in line with the relevant un security council resolutions , the eu acquis , and on the basis of respect for the principles on which the union is founded; reiterates its call on turkey to commit and contribute to a comprehensive settlement , to begin withdrawing its troops from cyprus , to transfer the sealed-off area of famagusta to the un and its lawful inhabitants in accordance with unsc resolution 550(1984) , as an effort to pave the way for a democratic comprehensive settlement , and to refrain from actions altering the demographic balance on the island; praises the important work of the committee on missing persons; recognises the right of the republic of cyprus to enter into bilateral agreements concerning its exclusive economic zone; urges turkey to engage in the peaceful settlement of disputes , and to refrain from any threat or action which might have negative effects on good neighbourly relations;


### 28. condemns the partial reopening of varosha beach , which undermines mutual trust and therefore the prospect of the resumption of direct talks on the comprehensive resolution of the cyprus issue; calls on turkey to reverse this action; reiterates its support for a fair , comprehensive and viable settlement on the basis of a bi-communal , bi-zonal federation with political equality; ### 28. condemns the partial illegal reopening of varosha , which undermines mutual trust and therefore the prospect of the resumption of direct talks on the comprehensive resolution of the cyprus issue; calls on turkey to reverse this action; calls on turkey to withdraw its troops from cyprus , to transfer the varosha area to its lawful inhabitants under the temporary administration of the un in accordance with unsc resolution 550 (1984) , and to refrain from any actions altering the demographic balance on the island through a policy of illegal settlements; reiterates its call on turkey , to commit and contribute to a comprehensive settlement in line with united nations security council relevant resolutions; reiterates its support for a fair , comprehensive and viable settlement of the cyprus problem within the un framework and in accordance with the relevant unsc resolutions , international law and in line with the eu acquis and the principles on which the eu is founded;


### 28. condemns the partial reopening of varosha beach , which undermines mutual trust and therefore the prospect of the resumption of direct talks on the comprehensive resolution of the cyprus issue; calls on turkey to reverse this action; reiterates its support for a fair , comprehensive and viable settlement on the basis of a bi-communal , bi-zonal federation with political equality; ### 28. strongly condemns the partial reopening of varosha beach , which violates international law and un security council resolutions 550 and 789 and undermines mutual trust and therefore the prospect of the resumption of direct talks on the comprehensive resolution of the cyprus issue; underlines the importance of the status of varosha and calls on turkey to immediately reverse this action; reiterates its support for a fair , comprehensive and viable settlement on the basis of a bi-communal , bi-zonal federation with political equality , as set out in the relevant un security council resolutions; , in accordance with international law , the eu acquis and the principles on which the union is founded;


### 28. condemns the partial reopening of varosha beach , which undermines mutual trust and therefore the prospect of the resumption of direct talks on the comprehensive resolution of the cyprus issue; calls on turkey to reverse this action; reiterates its support for a fair , comprehensive and viable settlement on the basis of a bi-communal , bi-zonal federation with political equality; ### 28. strongly condemns the partial reopening of varosha beach , which violates international law and un security council resolutions 550 and 789 and undermines mutual trust and therefore the prospect of the resumption of direct talks on the comprehensive resolution of the cyprus issue; underlines the importance of the status of varosha and calls on turkey to immediately reverse this action; reiterates its support for a fair , comprehensive and viable settlement on the basis of a bi-communal , bi-zonal federation with political equality , as set out in the relevant un security council resolutions , in accordance with international law , the eu acquis and the principles on which the union is founded;


### 28. condemns the partial reopening of varosha beach , which undermines mutual trust and therefore the prospect of the resumption of direct talks on the comprehensive resolution of the cyprus issue; calls on turkey to reverse this action; reiterates its support for a fair , comprehensive and viable settlement on the basis of a bi-communal , bi-zonal federation with political equality; ### 28. strongly condemns the partial reopening of varosha beach , which undermines mutual trust and therefore the prospect of the resumption of direct talks on the comprehensive resolution of the cyprus issue; calls on turkey to reverse this action; reiterates its support for a fair , comprehensive and viable settlement on the basis of a bi-communal , bi-zonal federation with political equality;


### 29. strongly condemns the turkish military interventions in syria , especially in the northeast and idlib , which constitute grave violations of international law; ### deleted


### 29. strongly condemns the turkish military interventions in syria , especially in the northeast and idlib , which constitute grave violations of international law; ### 29. strongly condemns the turkish military interventions in syria , especially in the northeast and idlib , which constitute grave violations of international law; reiterates its position as expressed in its resolution of 24 october 2019 on the turkish military operation in northeast syria and its consequences , including the call for an eu-wide arms embargo on turkey;


### 30. calls on turkey to remain committed to the peaceful resolution of the conflict in libya under the auspices of the un , and to fully adhere to the arms embargo imposed by the un security council; ### 30. calls on turkey to remain committed to the peaceful resolution of the conflict in libya under the auspices of the un , to fully adhere to the arms embargo imposed by the un security council and to not obstruct eu and nato missions mandated to enforce the un arms embargo on libya;


### 30. calls on turkey to remain committed to the peaceful resolution of the conflict in libya under the auspices of the un , and to fully adhere to the arms embargo imposed by the un security council; ### 30. calls on turkey and all other actors to remain committed to the peaceful resolution of the conflict in libya under the auspices of the un , and to fully adhere to the arms embargo imposed by the un security council;


### 31. regrets that , rather than calling for an end to the violence and for a resumption of peaceful negotiations supporting the efforts of the organization for security and co-operation in europe (osce) minsk group , turkey instead decided to unconditionally sustain the military actions of one of the sides in the recent conflict in nagorno-karabakh; ### deleted


### 31. regrets that , rather than calling for an end to the violence and for a resumption of peaceful negotiations supporting the efforts of the organization for security and co-operation in europe (osce) minsk group , turkey instead decided to unconditionally sustain the military actions of one of the sides in the recent conflict in nagorno-karabakh; ### 31. regrets that , rather than calling for an end to the violence and for a resumption of peaceful negotiations supporting the efforts of the co-chairs of the organization for security and co-operation in europe (osce) minsk group , turkey instead decided to unconditionally sustain the military actions of one of the sides in the recent conflict in nagorno-karabakh; strongly condemns the transfer of foreign fighters by turkey and azerbaijan from syria and elsewhere to the conflict zone , as confirmed by international actors , including the osce minsk group co-chair countries; is concerned by the destabilizing role of turkey , which puts at risk the security of the whole south caucasus region and calls on turkey to refrain from any military interference in the nagorno-karabakh conflict;


### 31. regrets that , rather than calling for an end to the violence and for a resumption of peaceful negotiations supporting the efforts of the organization for security and co-operation in europe (osce) minsk group , turkey instead decided to unconditionally sustain the military actions of one of the sides in the recent conflict in nagorno-karabakh; ### 31. firmly regrets that , rather than calling for an end to the violence and for a resumption of peaceful negotiations supporting the efforts of the organization for security and co-operation in europe (osce) minsk group , turkey instead decided to unconditionally sustain the military actions of one of the sides in the recent conflict in nagorno-karabakh thereby resorting to provocative rhetoric fuelling tensions instead of reducing them ; condemns the transfer of foreign fighters by turkey from syria and elsewhere to nagorno-karabakh , as confirmed by international actors , including the osce minsk group co-chair countries;


### 31. regrets that , rather than calling for an end to the violence and for a resumption of peaceful negotiations supporting the efforts of the organization for security and co-operation in europe (osce) minsk group , turkey instead decided to unconditionally sustain the military actions of one of the sides in the recent conflict in nagorno-karabakh; ### 31. condemns the fact that , rather than calling for an end to the violence and for a resumption of peaceful negotiations supporting the efforts of the organization for security and co- operation in europe (osce)minsk group , turkey instead decided to unconditionally sustain the military actions of one of the sides in the recent conflict in nagorno-karabakh;


### 31. regrets that , rather than calling for an end to the violence and for a resumption of peaceful negotiations supporting the efforts of the organization for security and co-operation in europe (osce) minsk group , turkey instead decided to unconditionally sustain the military actions of one of the sides in the recent conflict in nagorno-karabakh; ### 31. condemns the fact that , rather than calling for an end to the violence and for a resumption of peaceful negotiations supporting the efforts of the organization for security and co-operation in europe (osce) minsk group , turkey instead decided to unconditionally sustain the military actions of one of the sides in the recent conflict in nagorno-karabakh;


### 32. believes that it is high time to review the eu’s relations with turkey and to define a comprehensive , unified and coherent strategy for the medium to long term , among all eu institutions and member states; ### 32. believes that it is high time to review the eu’s relations with turkey and to define a comprehensive , unified and coherent strategy for the medium to long term , among all eu institutions and member states; believes that the eu should not confuse turkey with the policies of its current government , therefore underlines that the eu should remain committed to support turkey’s civil society , human rights defenders and journalists and to increase opportunities for people-to-people contacts , academic dialogue , access for turkish students to european universities , and media platforms for journalists with the objective of protecting and promoting democratic values and principles , human rights and the rule of law;


### 33. takes the view that enhancing communication and dialogue at all levels are key to restoring mutual trust between the eu and turkey; deplores the continuous and unjustified refusal of the turkish side to reinstate the normal functioning of the eu-turkey joint parliamentary committee; ### 33. takes the view that enhancing communication and dialogue at all levels are key to restoring mutual trust between the eu and turkey deplores the continuous and unjustified refusal of the turkish side to reinstate the normal functioning of the eu- turkey joint parliamentary committee; at the same time , recalls that the council’s decision of 15 july 2019 not to hold the eu – turkey association council and further meetings of the eu – turkey high level dialogues by virtue of turkish illegal drilling activities in the eastern mediterranean , remains valid;


### 33. takes the view that enhancing communication and dialogue at all levels are key to restoring mutual trust between the eu and turkey; deplores the continuous and unjustified refusal of the turkish side to reinstate the normal functioning of the eu-turkey joint parliamentary committee; ### 33. takes the view that enhancing communication and dialogue at all levels are key to restoring mutual trust between the eu and turkey and ask to reinstate the normal functioning of the eu-turkey joint parliamentary committee as a mean of the utmost importance to deepen mutual understanding and knowledge;


### 33. takes the view that enhancing communication and dialogue at all levels are key to restoring mutual trust between the eu and turkey; deplores the continuous and unjustified refusal of the turkish side to reinstate the normal functioning of the eu-turkey joint parliamentary committee; ### 33. takes the view that enhancing communication and dialogue at all levels are key to restoring mutual trust between the eu and turkey; expresses in this regard the hope that the normal functioning of the eu-turkey joint parliamentary committee can be reinstated soon;


### j. whereas parliament has long been at the forefront of the development of the petitions process internationally and has the most open and transparent petitions process in europe , allowing petitioners to participate fully in its activities; ### j. whereas parliament has long been at the forefront of the development of the petitions process internationally and has the most open and transparent petitions process in europe , allowing petitioners to participate in its activities;


### m. whereas a considerable number of petitions are discussed publicly in meetings of the committee on petitions; whereas petitioners have the right to present their petitions , and frequently play a full part in the discussion , thereby contributing actively to the work of the committee; whereas in 2019 , the committee on petitions held 9 ordinary committee meetings , where 250 petitions were discussed with 239 petitioners present , while 126 petitioners participated actively by taking the floor; ### m. whereas a considerable number of petitions are discussed publicly in meetings of the committee on petitions; whereas petitioners are frequently invited to present their petitions and play a full part in the discussion , thereby contributing actively to the work of the committee; whereas in 2019 , the committee on petitions held 9 ordinary committee meetings , where 250 petitions were discussed with 239 petitioners present , while 126 petitioners participated actively by taking the floor;


### 3. calls for a more focused and active press and communications service and a more active social media presence , making the work of the committee more responsive to public concerns; ### 3. stresses that active press and communications service and a more active social media presence would facilitate the responsiveness of the work of the committee more to public concerns;


### 1. recalls that the purpose of the un convention on the rights of persons with disabilities (crpd) is to promote , protect and ensure the full and equal enjoyment of all human rights and fundamental freedoms by all persons with disabilities; ### 1. recalls that the purpose of the un convention on the rights of persons with disabilities (crpd) is to promote , protect and ensure the full and equal enjoyment of all human rights and fundamental freedoms by all persons with all types of disabilities;


### 1. calls on the member states to systematically integrate the interests and rights of women and girls with disabilities into all national action plans , strategies and policies; ### 1. calls on the commission and the member states to systematically integrate the interests and rights of women and girls with disabilities into all action plans , strategies and policies;


### 2. condemns the fact that , according to these petitions , individuals with disabilities continue to encounter many challenges related to accessibility , participation in employment and mobility within the eu , and continue to encounter discrimination; considers it unacceptable that many employers are still not taking appropriate measures to tackle these issues , despite such measures being crucial to the economic and social inclusion of the 100 million persons with disabilities in the eu; ### 2. condemns the fact that , according to these petitions , individuals with disabilities continue to encounter many challenges related to accessibility , participation in employment and mobility within the eu , and continue to encounter discrimination; considers it unacceptable that many employers are still not taking appropriate measures to tackle these issues , despite such measures being crucial to the economic and social inclusion of the 100 million persons with disabilities in the eu , highlights that this leads to a large unused percentage of potential workforce.


### 2. calls on the member states to mount awareness-raising campaigns and provide clear information to workers and the general public on their rights and obligations , including the rights to work and employment , with a specific focus on accessibility and reasonable accommodation in accordance with the un convention on the rights of persons with disabilities; ### 2. calls on the member states to continue awareness-raising campaigns of anti-discrimination rights with a specific focus on accessibility and reasonable accommodation in accordance with the un convention the rights of persons with disabilities , and focus on those most at risk , including women with disabilities , while involving social partners , employers and trade unions;


### 3. reiterates its call on the member states to take specific measures with a view to ensuring full equality in practice to prevent or compensate for disadvantages linked to disabilities , and recommends that the member states ensure the employment of people with disabilities is addressed in their national reform programmes; ### 3. reiterates its call on the member states to take specific measures with a view to ensuring full equality in practice to prevent or compensate for disadvantages linked to disabilities , and recommends that the member states ensure the employment of people with disabilities is addressed in their national reform programmes; member states shall ensure that enterprises should receive incentives for a better inclusion of disabled people within their business. in this context , financial support and technical measures for the hiring of the disabled people should be simplified , and enterprises should be encouraged to adapt recruitment procedures so that people with disabilities have easier access to job offers and application procedures.


### 3. calls on the member states to take steps to ensure that women with disabilities benefit from the same rules with regard to access to the labour market; ### 3. calls on the commission and the member states to develop positive actions targeting women with disabilities in order to promote training , job placements , access to employment , job retention , equal career paths , adaptation in the workplace and work-life balance;


### 5. calls on the commission to assess whether the member states have detailed provisions in place to ensure that people can exercise their right to maternity leave , paternity leave and care leave , as well as arrangements for flexible working; ### 5. calls on the member states to assess the need for provisions in place to ensure that the application maternity , paternity leave and parental leave , as well as arrangements for flexible working are adapted to the diverse needs of parents with disabilities , parents with mental health problems , and parents of children with a disability , a chronic disease or a mental health problem;


### 6. calls for relevant , accurate data to be gathered on gender and the disability variable in the labour market; ### 6. calls for relevant , accurate data to be , where possible , gathered on gender and the disability variable in the labour market as well as social dimension;


### 7. considers that a reasonable effort should be made to adapt all workplaces to accommodate special needs with a view to potentially employing persons with all types of disabilities and insists on promoting dialogue between social partners with a view to fostering equal treatment , including through the monitoring of workplace practices , collective agreements , codes of conduct and research on or the exchange of experiences and good practices; ### 7. stresses that considerable efforts should be made to adapt all workplaces to improve their accessibility and accommodate special needs so as to promote a supportive environment for employing persons with all types of disabilities and insists on advancing dialogue between social partners with a view to fostering equal treatment , including at legislative level where appropriate , and through constant exchange of best practices;


### 7. considers that a reasonable effort should be made to adapt all workplaces to accommodate special needs with a view to potentially employing persons with all types of disabilities and insists on promoting dialogue between social partners with a view to fostering equal treatment , including through the monitoring of workplace practices , collective agreements , codes of conduct and research on or the exchange of experiences and good practices; ### 7. considers that member states should make a reasonable effort to adapt all public workplaces to accommodate special needs with a view to potentially employing persons with all types of disabilities and insists on promoting it in the private sector , as well as dialogue between social partners with a view to fostering equal treatment , including through the monitoring of workplace practices , collective agreements , codes of conduct and research on or the exchange of experiences and good practices , especially to foster inclusion of women with disabilities , people from a disadvantaged socio-economic background and lgbtq+ people with disabilities. relevant research should be made available in simple language.


### 7. looks forward to the evaluation of the european disability strategy and the commission proposal on the 2021 disability equality strategy with policies that are sensitive to the specific needs of women; ### 7. looks forward to the evaluation of the current european disability strategy and the commission proposal on the future european disability equality strategy for the next multi-years period to be released in 2021 combining horizontal and targeted approaches and incorporating strong gender perspective;


### 8. calls on all member states to take appropriate action to achieve the social and economic integration of disabled people , to raise awareness , to share best practices and to combat youth and senior unemployment , as unemployment can lead to poverty , social exclusion and mental health problems; ### 8. calls on member states and the commission to take effective action to achieve the social and economic integration of people with disabilities , to raise awareness , to share research and best practices and to combat youth and senior unemployment , as unemployment can lead to poverty , social exclusion and mental health problems;


### 8. calls on all member states to take appropriate action to achieve the social and economic integration of disabled people , to raise awareness , to share best practices and to combat youth and senior unemployment , as unemployment can lead to poverty , social exclusion and mental health problems; ### 8. calls on all member states to take appropriate action to achieve the social and economic integration of disabled people , to raise awareness , to share best practices and to combat youth and senior unemployment , as unemployment can lead to poverty , social exclusion and mental health problems; calls on member states to ensure access for people with disabilities to quality education , employment measures like the youth guarantee and exchange programmes as erasmus+.


### 8. calls on the member states to take steps to encourage and promote businesses that are committed to recruiting people with disabilities. ### 8. calls on the commission and the member states to optimise the eu structural funds to promote businesses that are committed to recruiting people with disabilities and to support people with disabilities in becoming entrepreneurs;


### 9. highlights the role of women , who usually have primary responsibility for taking care of children and dependants with disabilities; stresses that this has a direct effect on women’s access to jobs and their professional development and may negatively affect their conditions of employment; ### 9. highlights the role of women , who typically have primary responsibility for taking care of children and dependants with disabilities; stresses that this has a direct effect on women’s possibilities and means to access the job market and advance their professional development and may negatively affect their prospects of employment;


### 9. highlights the role of women , who usually have primary responsibility for taking care of children and dependants with disabilities; stresses that this has a direct effect on women’s access to jobs and their professional development and may negatively affect their conditions of employment; ### 9. highlights the role of women , who usually have primary responsibility for taking care of children and dependants with disabilities; stresses that this has a direct effect on women’s access to jobs and their professional development and may negatively affect their conditions of employment; member states should promote research on this topic , as data is scarce. calls on member states to establish a flexible parental leave system , with a job guarantee once the parental leave is over , which is equally accessible regardless of gender.


### 10. insists on updating and renewing the post-2020 european disability strategy , with the aim of further reducing inequalities for disadvantaged persons , and promoting their social and economic inclusion and independence , taking into account the challenges and issues relating to disabilities that have arisen from the covid-19 pandemic; notes that confinement measures taken by governments and teleworking may have affected persons with disabilities. ### 10. insists on updating and renewing the post-2020 european disability strategy , with the aim of further reducing inequalities for people with disabilities , and promoting their social and economic inclusion and independence;


### a. whereas , on average , just 48.3% of women with disabilities have a job in the eu , as against 53.3% of men1 ; ### a. whereas , on average , just 48.3% of women with disabilities have a job in the eu , as against 53.3% of men1a with disabilities; and only 20 ,7% of women with disabilities are in full employment compared to 28 ,6% of men with disabilities2a;


### b. whereas women and girls with disabilities can face many forms of discrimination; ### b. whereas women and girls with disabilities face multiple and intersectional discrimination based on both their gender and their disability;


### 4. calls on the member states to guarantee an accessible , non-stereotyped education system , with inclusive education measures; ### 4. calls on the commission and the member states to mainstream the rights of women and girls with disabilities when designing and implementing actions aimed at developing digital skills to enable all citizens to participate in the labour market;


### 1. recalls that ensuring the effective and uniform application of eu law is crucial for upholding the rule of law , which is one of the founding values of the union and its member states , as set out in article 2 of the treaty on european union; is , therefore , worried about the increasing number of petitions expressing citizens’ concerns over violations of the rule of law in the member states , including regarding disputed reforms of national judiciaries; stresses that non-compliance with the rule of law , including by sub-national entities , has a direct impact on citizens’ lives , as demonstrated in petitions received and by the outcome of special eurobarometer 489; calls on the commission to respect the commitments made in its 2019 communication entitled ‘strengthening the rule of law within the union: a blueprint for action’ (com(2019)0343) , in order to promote a culture of respect for the rule of law , reinforce cooperation with national authorities and ensure an effective common response to actual threats within the union; ### 1. recalls that ensuring the effective and uniform application of eu law is crucial for upholding the rule of law , which is one of the founding values of the union and its member states , as set out in article 2 of the treaty on european union; is , therefore , worried about the increasing number of petitions expressing citizens’ concerns over violations of the rule of law in the member states , including regarding disputed reforms of national judiciaries; stresses that non-compliance with the rule of law , including by sub-national entities , has a direct impact on citizens’ lives , as demonstrated in petitions received and by the outcome of special eurobarometer 489; calls on the commission to respect the commitments made in its 2019 communication entitled ‘strengthening the rule of law within the union: a blueprint for action’ (com(2019)0343) , in order to promote a culture of respect for the rule of law , reinforce cooperation with national authorities and ensure an effective common response to actual threats within the union; reminds the commission that the work done to ensure the effective enforcement of existing eu law is of equivalent importance to the work devoted to developing new legislation;


### 2. stresses that the right to petition the european parliament is one of the fundamental rights of eu citizens , as laid down in article 44 of the charter of fundamental rights of the european union and article 227 of the treaty on the functioning of the european union; underlines the importance of petitions as one of the most accessible ways for citizens to address the eu institutions in order to express their concerns about possible violations of their rights and about instances of misapplication or breaches of eu law; recalls that petitions are the cornerstone of participatory democracy and that as such , they contribute to bridging the gap between citizens and political institutions by promoting citizens’ active participation and engagement in the eu political debate; ### 2. stresses that the right to petition the european parliament is one of the fundamental rights of eu citizens , as laid down in article 44 of the charter of fundamental rights of the european union and article 227 of the treaty on the functioning of the european union; underlines the importance of petitions as a means for citizens and residents to feel involved in the activities of the union , as it is one of the most accessible ways for citizens to address the eu institutions in order to express their concerns about possible violations of their rights and about instances of misapplication or breaches of eu law and on potential lacunae; recalls that the right to petition is the cornerstone of participatory democracy and european citizenship and that as such , it contributes to bridging the gap between citizens and political institutions by promoting citizens’ active participation and engagement in the eu political debate; calls for the commission’s commitment to take an active role in actions required by petitioners in order to achieve real change in citizens’ lives;


### 4. welcomes the commission’s commitment , as clearly set out in its 2017 annual report on monitoring the application of eu law (com(2018)0540) , to placing great value on the contributions of citizens , businesses and other stakeholders in detecting breaches of eu law; notes , in this regard , the commission’s efforts to illustrate the impact of petitions on its enforcement action in a number of policy areas such as the environment , migration , taxation and the internal market; deplores , however , the lack of figures on the number of petitions handled by the commission and the number that lead to the initiation of eu pilots and infringement procedures; ### 4. welcomes the commission’s commitment , as clearly set out in its 2017 annual report on monitoring the application of eu law (com(2018)0540) , to placing great value on the contributions of citizens , businesses and other stakeholders in detecting breaches of eu law; notes , in this regard , the commission’s efforts to illustrate the impact of petitions on its enforcement action in a number of policy areas such as the environment , migration , taxation and the internal market; underlines , however , the large amount of petitions received referring to violations and misapplication of eu law in those fields , in addition to many other areas of activity; deplores the lack of figures on the number of petitions handled by the commission and the number that lead to the initiation of eu pilots and infringement procedures;


### 5. welcomes , in this regard , the increased transparency and the disclosure of more information in the 2018 report about the number of petitions dealt with by the commission and about its follow-up actions; notes , however , that in the large majority of cases the commission did not open an investigation and did not take any further action; is particularly concerned , in this respect , about the practice of referring a significant number of petitioners to other bodies at national , regional or local level; acknowledges that this practice reflects the commission’s new enforcement policy announced in its 2016 communication entitled ‘eu law: better results through better application’ (c(2016)8600) , which aims to direct citizens to the national level when complaints or petitions do not raise issues of wider principle or systematic failure to comply with eu law and can satisfactorily be dealt with by other mechanisms; ### 5. welcomes , in this regard , the increased transparency and the disclosure of more information in the 2018 report about the number of petitions dealt with by the commission and about its follow-up actions; notes , however , that in the large majority of cases the commission did not open an investigation and did not take any further action; is particularly concerned , in this respect , about the practice of referring a significant number of petitioners to other bodies at national , regional or local level; calls on the commission to improve , in this respect , its handling of petitions addressed by providing timely and in-depth answers; considers insufficient the commission’s replies merely stating that it does not have competence to take further actions at eu level; calls on the commission to work collaboratively with member states for the effective resolution of petitions; acknowledges that this practice reflects the commission’s new enforcement policy announced in its 2016 communication entitled ‘eu law: better results through better application’ (c(2016)8600) , which aims to direct citizens to the national level when complaints or petitions do not raise issues of wider principle or systematic failure to comply with eu law and can satisfactorily be dealt with by other mechanisms;


### 6. reiterates its concern that this approach may cause citizens to believe that their voice goes unheard by the eu institutions and may ultimately deprive them of legal protection should a remedy at eu level prove more effective due to the national circumstances or the nature of the interests involved; calls on the commission to clarify how it intends to address the gap between citizens’ expectations and reality regarding the possibility of obtaining a remedy at eu level , and to explain how its approach fits with its role as a guardian of the treaties and its oversight responsibilities under article 17(1) of the teu; ### 6. reiterates its concern that this approach may cause citizens to believe that their voice goes unheard by the eu institutions and may ultimately deprive them of legal protection should a remedy at eu level prove more effective due to the national circumstances or the nature of the interests involved; stresses the disappointment that the commission’s practice causes to citizens who look up to the eu for the protection of their rights and to the commission , in particular , as guardian of the treaties under article 17 teu; calls for the above enforcement policy to be reconsidered , so as to ensure that it by no means jeopardises the handling of certain cases whose effective resolution might be better achieved at eu level; calls on the commission to clarify how it intends to address the gap between citizens’ expectations and reality regarding the possibility of obtaining a remedy at eu level , and to explain how its approach fits with its role as a guardian of the treaties and its oversight responsibilities under article 17(1) of the teu;


### 7. stresses that , despite its efforts over recent years to enhance the transparency of its monitoring and enforcement activities (e.g. through a centralised platform providing infringement-related information) , the commission has not yet responded to parliament’s repeated calls to be regularly informed about every eu pilot opened and infringement procedure initiated , especially when they result from petitions; stresses the importance of receiving regular updates on developments in infringement procedures related to open petitions , while respecting the confidentiality requirements laid down in the case law of the court of justice of the european union (cjeu); reminds the commission about citizens’ high expectations of transparency with respect to its oversight activities; urges the commission , therefore , to share this information with parliament in a spirit of sincere cooperation in order to enable parliament to exercise its scrutiny over the executive under article 14 of the teu and , ultimately , to enhance the legitimacy and accountability of the commission’s enforcement action; ### 7. deplores that , despite its efforts over recent years to enhance the transparency of its monitoring and enforcement activities (e.g. through a centralised platform providing infringement-related information) , the commission has not yet responded to parliament’s repeated calls to be regularly informed about every eu pilot opened and infringement procedure initiated , especially when they result from petitions; stresses the importance of receiving regular updates on developments in infringement procedures related to open petitions , while respecting the confidentiality requirements laid down in the case law of the court of justice of the european union (cjeu); regrets the still existing lack of commitment shown by the commission when responding to the concerns raised in eu pilot procedures; reminds the commission about citizens’ high expectations of transparency with respect to its oversight activities; urges the commission , therefore , to share this information with parliament in a spirit of sincere cooperation in order to enable parliament to exercise its scrutiny over the executive under article 14 of the teu and , ultimately , to enhance the legitimacy and accountability of the commission’s enforcement action , build trust in the eu project and , ultimately , enhance the legitimacy of the eu pilot procedure;


### 8. notes that the number of new complaints registered by the commission in 2018 and 2017 reached its highest level since 2011 , with a record 3 850 new complaints in 2018; welcomes citizens’ increasing empowerment as regards the process of monitoring and enforcing eu law , as evidenced by the significant flow of complaints and petitions; points out , however , that , as is the case for petitions , the number of complaints leading to investigations remained very low in 2018 and in 2017 as a proportion of the total number of complaints received; asks the commission to clarify how it intends to address the gap in citizens’ expectations regarding the possibility of obtaining a remedy at eu level; ### 8. notes that the number of new complaints registered by the commission in 2018 and 2017 reached its highest level since 2011 , with a record 3 850 new complaints in 2018; welcomes citizens’ increasing empowerment as regards the process of monitoring and enforcing eu law , as evidenced by the significant flow of complaints and petitions; points out , however , that , as is the case for petitions , the number of complaints leading to investigations remained very low in 2018 and in 2017 as a proportion of the total number of complaints received; calls for a more transparent implementation of the enforcement policy; encourages the commission to take a more active approach when collecting information and responding to citizens’ concerns , in particular to tackle the “blame brussels” culture;


### (1) the european green deal5 establishes the objective of the union becoming climate neutral in 2050 in a manner that contributes to the european economy , growth and job creation. that objective , and the objective of a 55% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 as set out in the 2030 climate target plan6 that was endorsed both by the european parliament7 and by the european council8 , requires an energy transition and significantly higher shares of renewable energy sources in an integrated energy system. ### (1) the european green deal5 establishes the objective of the union becoming climate neutral in 2050 in a manner that contributes to the european economy , growth and job creation. that objective , and the objective of at least a 55% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 as set out in the 2030 climate target plan6 that was endorsed both by the european parliament7 and by the european council8 , requires an energy transition and significantly higher shares of renewable energy sources in an integrated energy system.


### (1) the european green deal5 establishes the objective of the union becoming climate neutral in 2050 in a manner that contributes to the european economy , growth and job creation. that objective , and the objective of a 55% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 as set out in the 2030 climate target plan6 that was endorsed both by the european parliament7 and by the european council8 , requires an energy transition and significantly higher shares of renewable energy sources in an integrated energy system. ### (1) the european green deal5 establishes the objective of the union becoming climate neutral in 2050 in a manner that contributes to the european economy , growth and job creation. that objective , and the objective to cut greenhouse gas emissions by at least 55% by 2030 as set out in the 2030 climate target plan6 that was endorsed both by the european parliament7 and by the european council8 , requires an energy transition and significantly higher shares of renewable energy sources in an integrated energy system.


### (2) renewable energy plays a fundamental role in delivering the european green deal and for achieving climate neutrality by 2050 , given that the energy sector contributes over 75% of total greenhouse gas emissions in the union. by reducing those greenhouse gas emissions , renewable energy also contributes to tackling environmental-related challenges such as biodiversity loss. ### (2) renewable energy plays a fundamental role in delivering the european green deal and for achieving climate neutrality by 2050 , given that the energy sector contributes over 75% of total greenhouse gas emissions in the union. by reducing those greenhouse gas emissions , renewable energy also indirectly contributes to tackling environmental-related challenges which are exacerbated by climate change , such as biodiversity loss. however , evidence shows that deployment of renewable energy can also lead to biodiversity loss. there is a growing opposition from society to energy from biomass as a result of a harmful effects on the biodiversity as depicted in the petitions 0194/2016 , 0145/2019 or 1442/2020. this directive aims to remediate past rules and prevent further biodiversity loss.


### (3) directive (eu) 2018/2001 of the european parliament and of the council9 sets a binding union target to reach a share of at least 32 % of energy from renewable sources in the union's gross final consumption of energy by 2030. under the climate target plan , the share of renewable energy in gross final energy consumption would need to increase to 40% by 2030 in order to achieve the union’s greenhouse gas emissions reduction target10 . therefore , the target set out in article 3 of that directive needs to be increased. ### (3) directive (eu) 2018/2001 of the european parliament and of the council9 sets a binding union target to reach a share of at least 32 % of energy from renewable sources in the union's gross final consumption of energy by 2030. under the climate target plan , the share of renewable energy in gross final energy consumption would need to increase to at least 40% by 2030 in order to achieve the union’s greenhouse gas emissions reduction target10 and diversification of energy supplies. therefore , the target set out in article 3 of that directive needs to be increased.


### (3) directive (eu) 2018/2001 of the european parliament and of the council9 sets a binding union target to reach a share of at least 32 % of energy from renewable sources in the union's gross final consumption of energy by 2030. under the climate target plan , the share of renewable energy in gross final energy consumption would need to increase to 40% by 2030 in order to achieve the union’s greenhouse gas emissions reduction target10 . therefore , the target set out in article 3 of that directive needs to be increased. ### (3) directive (eu) 2018/2001 of the european parliament and of the council9 sets a binding union target to reach a share of at least 32 % of energy from renewable sources in the union's gross final consumption of energy by 2030. under the climate target plan , the share of renewable energy in gross final energy consumption would need to increase to at least 40% by 2030 in order to achieve the union’s greenhouse gas emissions reduction target10 . therefore , the target set out in article 3 of that directive needs to be increased.


### (3) directive (eu) 2018/2001 of the european parliament and of the council9 sets a binding union target to reach a share of at least 32 % of energy from renewable sources in the union's gross final consumption of energy by 2030. under the climate target plan , the share of renewable energy in gross final energy consumption would need to increase to 40% by 2030 in order to achieve the union’s greenhouse gas emissions reduction target10 . therefore , the target set out in article 3 of that directive needs to be increased. ### (3) directive (eu) 2018/2001 of the european parliament and of the council9 sets a binding union target to reach a share of at least 32 % of energy from renewable sources in the union's gross final consumption of energy by 2030. under the climate target plan , the share of renewable energy in gross final energy consumption would need to increase to 45% by 2030 in order to achieve the union’s greenhouse gas emissions reduction target10 . therefore , the target set out in article 3 of that directive needs to be increased.


### (4) there is a growing recognition of the need for alignment of bioenergy policies with the cascading principle of biomass use11 , with a view to ensuring fair access to the biomass raw material market for the development of innovative , high value-added bio-based solutions and a sustainable circular bioeconomy. when developing support schemes for bioenergy , member states should therefore take into consideration the available sustainable supply of biomass for energy and non-energy uses and the maintenance of the national forest carbon sinks and ecosystems as well as the principles of the circular economy and the biomass cascading use , and the waste hierarchy established in directive 2008/98/ecof the european parliament and of the council12 . for this , they should grant no support to the production of energy from saw logs , veener logs , stumps and roots and avoid promoting the use of quality roundwood for energy except in well-defined circumstances. in line with the cascading principle , woody biomass should be used according to its highest economic and environmental added value in the following order of priorities: 1) wood-based products , 2) extending their service life , 3) re-use , 4) recycling , 5) bio-energy and 6) disposal. where no other use for woody biomass is economically viable or environmentally appropriate , energy recovery helps to reduce energy generation from non-renewable sources. member states’ support schemes for bioenergy should therefore be directed to such feedstocks for which little market competition exists with the material sectors , and whose sourcing is considered positive for both climate and biodiversity , in order to avoid negative incentives for unsustainable bioenergy pathways , as identified in the jrc report ‘the use of woody biomass for energy production in the eu’13 . on the other hand , in defining the further implications of the cascading principle , it is necessary to recognise the national specificities which guide member states in the design of their support schemeswaste prevention , reuse and recycling of waste should be the priority option. member states should avoid creating support schemes which would be counter to targets on treatment of waste and which would lead to the inefficient use of recyclable waste. moreover , in order to ensure a more efficient use of bioenergy , from 2026 on member states should not give support anymore to electricity-only plants , unless the installations are in regions with a specific use status as regards their transition away from fossil fuels or if the installations use carbon capture and storage. ### (4) there is a growing recognition of the need for alignment of bioenergy policies with the cascading principle of biomass use11 , with a view to ensuring fair access to the biomass raw material market for the development of innovative , high value-added bio-based solutions and a sustainable circular bioeconomy. when developing support schemes for bioenergy , member states should therefore take into consideration the available sustainable supply of biomass for energy and non-energy uses and the maintenance of the national forest carbon sinks and ecosystems as well as the principles of the circular economy and the biomass cascading use , and the waste hierarchy established in directive 2008/98/ecof the european parliament and of the council12 . for this , they should grant no support to the production of energy from primary woody biomass and they should promote the use of secondary woody biomass for energy in well-defined circumstances. in line with the cascading principle , woody biomass should be used according to its highest economic and environmental added value in the following order of priorities: 1) wood-based products , 2) extending their service life , 3) re-use , 4) recycling , 5) bio-energy and 6) disposal. where no other use for woody biomass is economically viable or environmentally appropriate , energy recovery helps to reduce energy generation from non-renewable sources. member states’ support schemes for bioenergy should therefore be directed to such feedstocks for which little market competition exists with the material sectors , and whose sourcing is considered positive for both climate and biodiversity , in order to avoid negative incentives for unsustainable bioenergy pathways , as identified in the jrc report ‘the use of woody biomass for energy production in the eu’13 . on the other hand , in defining the further implications of the cascading principle , it is necessary to recognise the national specificities which guide member states in the design of their support schemeswaste prevention , reuse and recycling of waste should be the priority option. member states should avoid creating support schemes which would be counter to targets on treatment of waste and which would lead to the inefficient use of recyclable waste. moreover , in order to ensure a more efficient use of bioenergy , from 2026 on member states should not give support anymore to electricity-only plants , unless the installations are in regions with a specific use status as regards their transition away from fossil fuels or if the installations use carbon capture and storage.


### (4) there is a growing recognition of the need for alignment of bioenergy policies with the cascading principle of biomass use11 , with a view to ensuring fair access to the biomass raw material market for the development of innovative , high value-added bio-based solutions and a sustainable circular bioeconomy. when developing support schemes for bioenergy , member states should therefore take into consideration the available sustainable supply of biomass for energy and non-energy uses and the maintenance of the national forest carbon sinks and ecosystems as well as the principles of the circular economy and the biomass cascading use , and the waste hierarchy established in directive 2008/98/ecof the european parliament and of the council12 . for this , they should grant no support to the production of energy from saw logs , veener logs , stumps and roots and avoid promoting the use of quality roundwood for energy except in well-defined circumstances. in line with the cascading principle , woody biomass should be used according to its highest economic and environmental added value in the following order of priorities: 1) wood-based products , 2) extending their service life , 3) re-use , 4) recycling , 5) bio-energy and 6) disposal. where no other use for woody biomass is economically viable or environmentally appropriate , energy recovery helps to reduce energy generation from non-renewable sources. member states’ support schemes for bioenergy should therefore be directed to such feedstocks for which little market competition exists with the material sectors , and whose sourcing is considered positive for both climate and biodiversity , in order to avoid negative incentives for unsustainable bioenergy pathways , as identified in the jrc report ‘the use of woody biomass for energy production in the eu’13 . on the other hand , in defining the further implications of the cascading principle , it is necessary to recognise the national specificities which guide member states in the design of their support schemeswaste prevention , reuse and recycling of waste should be the priority option. member states should avoid creating support schemes which would be counter to targets on treatment of waste and which would lead to the inefficient use of recyclable waste. moreover , in order to ensure a more efficient use of bioenergy , from 2026 on member states should not give support anymore to electricity-only plants , unless the installations are in regions with a specific use status as regards their transition away from fossil fuels or if the installations use carbon capture and storage. ### (4) there is a growing recognition of the need for alignment of bioenergy policies with the cascading principle of biomass use11 , with a view to ensuring fair access to the biomass raw material market for the development of innovative , high value-added bio-based solutions and a sustainable circular bioeconomy. when developing support schemes for bioenergy , member states should therefore take into consideration the available sustainable supply of biomass for energy and non-energy uses and the maintenance of the national forest carbon sinks and ecosystems , including wildfire prevention , as well as the principles of the circular economy and the biomass cascading use , and the waste hierarchy established in directive 2008/98/ecof the european parliament and of the council12 . for this , they should grant no support to the production of energy from saw logs , veener logs , stumps and roots and avoid promoting the use of quality roundwood for energy except in well-defined circumstances. in line with the cascading principle , woody biomass should be used according to its highest economic and environmental added value in the following order of priorities: 1) wood-based products , 2) extending their service life , 3) re-use , 4) recycling , 5) bio-energy and 6) disposal. where no other use for woody biomass is economically viable or environmentally appropriate , energy recovery helps to reduce energy generation from non-renewable sources. member states’ support schemes for bioenergy should therefore be directed to such feedstocks for which little market competition exists with the material sectors , and whose sourcing is considered positive for both climate and biodiversity , in order to avoid negative incentives for unsustainable bioenergy pathways , as identified in the jrc report ‘the use of woody biomass for energy production in the eu’13 . on the other hand , in defining the further implications of the cascading principle , it is necessary to recognise the national specificities which guide member states in the design of their support schemeswaste prevention , reuse and recycling of waste should be the priority option. member states should avoid creating support schemes which would be counter to targets on treatment of waste and which would lead to the inefficient use of recyclable waste. moreover , in order to ensure a more efficient use of bioenergy , from 2026 on member states should not give support anymore to electricity-only plants , unless the installations are in regions with a specific use status as regards their transition away from fossil fuels , if the installations use carbon capture and storage or if cogeneration is not technically feasible or commercially viable.


### (5) the rapid growth and increasing cost-competitiveness of renewable electricity production can be used to satisfy a growing share of energy demand , for instance using heat pumps for space heating or low-temperature industrial processes , electric vehicles for transport , or electric furnaces in certain industries. renewable electricity can also be used to produce synthetic fuels for consumption in hard-to-decarbonise transport sectors such as aviation and maritime transport. a framework for electrification needs to enable robust and efficient coordination and expand market mechanisms to match both supply and demand in space and time , stimulate investments in flexibility , and help integrate large shares of variable renewable generation. member states should therefore ensure that the deployment of renewable electricity continues to increase at an adequate pace to meet growing demand. for this , member states should establish a framework that includes market-compatible mechanisms to tackle remaining barriers to have secure and adequate electricity systems fit for a high level of renewable energy , as well as storage facilities , fully integrated into the electricity system. in particular , this framework shall tackle remaining barriers , including non-financial ones such as insufficient digital and human resources of authorities to process a growing number of permitting applications. ### (5) the rapid growth and increasing cost-competitiveness of renewable electricity production can be used to satisfy a growing share of energy demand , for instance using heat pumps for space heating or low-temperature industrial processes , electric vehicles for transport , or electric furnaces in certain industries. renewable electricity can also be used to produce synthetic fuels for consumption in hard-to-decarbonise transport sectors such as aviation and maritime transport. a framework for electrification needs to enable robust and efficient coordination and expand market mechanisms to match both supply and demand in space and time , stimulate investments in flexibility , and help integrate large shares of variable renewable generation. member states should therefore ensure that the deployment of renewable electricity continues to increase at an adequate pace to meet growing demand. for this , member states should establish a framework that includes market-compatible mechanisms to tackle remaining barriers to have secure and adequate electricity systems fit for a high level of renewable energy , as well as storage facilities , fully integrated into the electricity system. in particular , this framework shall tackle remaining barriers , including non-financial ones such as insufficient digital and human resources of authorities to process a growing number of permitting applications. when addressing barriers regarding administrative procedures , member states shall aim for efficient and timely granting of permits , while ensuring a high level of local acceptance for renewable energy projects.


### (5) the rapid growth and increasing cost-competitiveness of renewable electricity production can be used to satisfy a growing share of energy demand , for instance using heat pumps for space heating or low-temperature industrial processes , electric vehicles for transport , or electric furnaces in certain industries. renewable electricity can also be used to produce synthetic fuels for consumption in hard-to-decarbonise transport sectors such as aviation and maritime transport. a framework for electrification needs to enable robust and efficient coordination and expand market mechanisms to match both supply and demand in space and time , stimulate investments in flexibility , and help integrate large shares of variable renewable generation. member states should therefore ensure that the deployment of renewable electricity continues to increase at an adequate pace to meet growing demand. for this , member states should establish a framework that includes market-compatible mechanisms to tackle remaining barriers to have secure and adequate electricity systems fit for a high level of renewable energy , as well as storage facilities , fully integrated into the electricity system. in particular , this framework shall tackle remaining barriers , including non-financial ones such as insufficient digital and human resources of authorities to process a growing number of permitting applications. ### (5) the rapid growth and increasing cost-competitiveness of renewable electricity production can be used to satisfy a growing share of energy demand , for instance using heat pumps for space heating or low-temperature industrial processes , electric vehicles for transport , or electric furnaces in certain industries. renewable electricity can also be used to produce synthetic fuels for consumption in hard-to-decarbonise transport sectors such as aviation and maritime transport. a framework for electrification needs to enable robust and efficient coordination and expand market mechanisms to match both supply and demand in space and time , stimulate investments in flexibility , and help integrate large shares of variable renewable generation. this framework must also take into account existing regional disparities and the specific features of each region , and to support cost-effective solutions , ensuring a reduction in energy costs for europe's people and businesses. member states should therefore ensure that the deployment of renewable electricity continues to increase at an adequate pace to meet growing demand. for this , member states should establish a framework that includes market-compatible mechanisms to tackle remaining barriers to have secure and adequate electricity systems fit for a high level of renewable energy , as well as storage facilities , fully integrated into the electricity system. in particular , this framework shall tackle remaining barriers , including non-financial ones such as insufficient digital and human resources of authorities and guidance to process more efficiently and cost-effectively a growing number of permitting applications in a timely manner.