### 3. points out that petitions constitute a unique opportunity for parliament and the other eu institutions to directly connect with eu citizens and maintain a regular dialogue with them , particularly in cases where they are affected by the misapplication or breach of eu law; stresses the need for enhanced cooperation between the eu institutions and national , regional and local authorities on inquiries regarding the implementation of and compliance with eu law; believes that such cooperation is crucial to address and resolve citizens’ concerns over the application of eu law and contributes to strengthening the democratic legitimacy and accountability of the union; calls , therefore , for the more active participation of member states’ representatives in committee meetings and for swifter responses to the requests for clarification or information sent by the committee on petitions to the national authorities; ### 3. points out that petitions constitute a unique opportunity for parliament and the other eu institutions to directly connect with eu citizens and maintain a regular dialogue with them , particularly in cases where they are affected by the misapplication or breach of eu law; stresses the need for enhanced cooperation between the eu institutions and national , regional and local authorities on inquiries regarding the implementation of and compliance with eu law , including mandatory answer to the committee; believes that such cooperation is crucial to address and resolve citizens’ concerns over the application of eu law and contributes to strengthening the democratic legitimacy and accountability of the union; calls , therefore , for the more active participation of member states’ representatives in committee meetings and for swifter responses to the requests for clarification or information sent by the committee on petitions to the national authorities;


### 4. recalls that petitions contribute considerably to the commission’s role as guardian of the treaties; stresses that reinforced cooperation between the committee on petitions and the commission and timely answers from the commission are essential to ensure the successful treatment of petitions; reiterates its call on the commission for regular updates on developments in infringement proceedings and for access to relevant commission documents on infringements and eu pilot procedures which have been closed; ### 4. recalls that petitions contribute considerably to the commission’s role as guardian of the treaties; stresses that reinforced cooperation between the committee on petitions and the commission and timely , precise and clear answers from the commission are essential to ensure the successful treatment of petitions; reiterates its call on the commission for regular updates on developments in infringement proceedings and for access to relevant commission documents on infringements and eu pilot procedures which have been closed;


### 5. calls on the commission to assess whether national authorities are taking the necessary measures to respond to citizens’ concerns as expressed in their petitions where cases of systemic failure in compliance with eu law occur; ### 5. calls on the commission to actively assess whether national authorities are taking the necessary measures to respond to citizens’ concerns as expressed in their petitions where cases of systemic failure in compliance with eu law occur;


### 6. recalls that cooperation with other committees in parliament is essential for the accurate and comprehensive treatment of petitions; notes that in 2020 , 56 petitions were sent to other committees for opinion and 385 for information; welcomes the fact that 40 opinions and 60 acknowledgements of taking petitions into consideration in their work were received from other committees; recalls that petitioners are informed of the decisions to request opinions from other committees for the treatment of their petitions; calls on parliamentary committees to step up their efforts to actively contribute to the examination of petitions – by proving their expertise – and thus enable parliament to respond more swiftly and comprehensively to citizens’ concerns; regrets that the peti network could not meet in 2020; ### 6. recalls that cooperation with other committees in parliament is essential for the accurate and comprehensive treatment of petitions; notes that in 2020 , 56 petitions were sent to other committees for opinion and 385 for information; welcomes the fact that 40 opinions and 60 acknowledgements of taking petitions into consideration in their work were received from other committees; regrets , however , that there is no clear information about this feedback and the fact that many petitions are not even considered by the concerned committees; recalls that petitioners are informed of the decisions to request opinions from other committees for the treatment of their petitions; calls on parliamentary committees to step up their efforts to actively contribute to the examination of petitions – by proving their expertise – and thus enable parliament to respond more swiftly and comprehensively to citizens’ concerns; regrets that the peti network could not meet in 2020;


### 11. is seriously concerned about the public health and socio-economic damages caused by the covid-19 pandemic; welcomes the excellent work done by the committee on petitions which , by voicing citizens’ concerns over the public health and socio-economic crises related to the covid-19 pandemic , contributed to ensuring parliament’s responsiveness to citizens’ needs and expectations as regards the union’s capacity to address such a global challenge; draws attention , in this regard , to the important follow-up actions taken by the committee on petitions to respond to the issues raised in covid-19-related petitions , which lead to the adoption in plenary of the resolutions on the schengen system and measures taken during the covid-19 crisis9 , on the rights of persons with intellectual disabilities and their families in the covid-19 crisis10 and on tackling homelessness rates in the eu11 ; ### 11. is seriously concerned about the public health and socio-economic damages caused by the covid-19 pandemic; draws attention , in this regard , to the important follow-up actions taken by the committee on petitions to respond to the issues raised in covid-19-related petitions , which lead to the adoption in plenary of the resolutions on the schengen system and measures taken during the covid-19 crisis9 , on the rights of persons with intellectual disabilities and their families in the covid-19 crisis10 and on tackling homelessness rates in the eu11 ;


### 14. takes note that , along with fundamental rights , health was the main area of concern for petitioners in 2020; while recognising that health concerns related to the covid-19 pandemic were at the centre of the committee on petitions’ work , draws attention to the resolution on additional funding for biomedical research on myalgic encephalomyelitis , the motion for which was adopted by the committee on 30 april 2020 , adopted in plenary on 18 june 202013 ; recalls that parliament’s resolution has been highly welcomed by the scientific and patients’ communities; reiterates , in this regard , its call for coordinated and enhanced research efforts and for additional funding to support progress in research in order to address the human and socio-economic consequences of the growing number of individuals living and working with long-term disabling and chronic conditions; ### 14. takes note that , along with fundamental rights , health was the main area of concern for petitioners in 2020; while recognising that health concerns related to the covid-19 pandemic were at the centre of the committee on petitions’ work , draws attention to the resolution on additional funding for biomedical research on myalgic encephalomyelitis , the motion for which was adopted by the committee on 30 april 2020 , adopted in plenary on 18 june 202013 ;


### 19. underlines that the petitions web portal is an essential tool for ensuring a smooth , efficient and transparent petitions process; welcomes , in this regard , the improvements on data protection and on the security features which have made the portal more user-friendly and secure for citizens; stresses that efforts must be continued to make the portal more accessible to persons with disabilities , including by enabling the tabling of petitions in national sign languages; ### 19. underlines that the petitions web portal is an essential tool for ensuring a smooth , efficient and transparent petitions process; welcomes , in this regard , the improvements on data protection and on the security features which have made the portal more user-friendly and secure for citizens; stresses that efforts must be continued to make the portal more accessible to persons with disabilities , including by enabling the tabling of petitions in national sign languages; nevertheless , it is urgent to change or update the computerized registration and signature system , so that it is truly agile and allows citizen participation in accordance with their needs and urgencies , in real time.


### 1. welcomes the commission’s communication’s aim to make the approach to the better law-making more dynamic and adaptive to further developments; ### 1. welcomes the commission’s communication’s aim to make the approach to the better law-making more dynamic and adaptive to further developments; insists nevertheless that its operational aspects will become clearer only with the revision of the better regulation guidelines and toolbox , which will be thoroughly scrutinized by the parliament;


### 2. welcomes the efforts to consolidate the consultation process and the commitment to report on each public consultation within eight weeks of its closure; calls for improved systematic assessments of public consultations and for the commission to increase its outreach activities and measures to promote greater participation; ### 2. welcomes the efforts to consolidate the consultation process and the commitment to report on each public consultation within eight weeks of its closure; calls for improved systematic assessments of public consultations and for the commission to increase its outreach activities and measures to promote greater participation; calls on the commission to better engage with its representations in the member states , with consultative bodies on the eu level and with national authorities with the view to disseminating more information about public consultations;


### h. whereas in 2021 the commission introduced the ‘one in , one out’ approach with the intention of offsetting new burdens resulting from the commission’s legislative proposals by removing already existing burdens in the same policy area; ### h. whereas in 2021 the commission introduced the ‘one in , one out’ approach with the intention of offsetting new burdens resulting from the commission’s legislative proposals by removing already existing burdens in the same policy area; whereas in 2017 the commission decided against the 'one in , one out' approach and the idea of setting 'ex ante burden reduction targets' in its work on eu lawmaking owing to the risk of creating 'deregulatory pressures' and impairing 'its political responsibility to deliver what needs to be done when it needs to be done'1a;


### 10. underlines that ‘strategic foresight’ could play a key role in helping to future-proof eu policy-making by ensuring that assessments of new initiatives are grounded in a longer-term perspective , emphasising the added value of quality legislation as an investment in the future; welcomes the integration of ‘foresight elements’ into the commission’s better regulation agenda in impact assessments and evaluations; considers , however , that the commission’s methodology for quantifying costs , deciding on trade-offs and implementing strategic foresight remains unclear , and that practice will allow assessment of how these approaches have been followed in practice; encourages the commission to look into innovative cost assessment tools; ### 10. underlines that ‘strategic foresight’ could play a role in helping to future-proof eu policy-making by ensuring that assessments of new initiatives are grounded in a longer-term perspective , emphasising the added value of quality legislation as an investment in the future; welcomes the integration of ‘foresight elements’ into the commission’s better regulation agenda in impact assessments and evaluations; considers , however , that the commission’s methodology for quantifying costs , deciding on trade-offs and implementing strategic foresight remains unclear , and that practice will allow assessment of how these approaches have been followed in practice; encourages the commission to look into innovative cost assessment tools;


### 12. takes note of the ‘one in , one out’ approach by which the commission aims to offset newly introduced burdens by relieving citizens and businesses of equivalent burdens at eu level in the same policy area; regrets the unilateral introduction of this approach by the commission , without a prior impact assessment or consultation; underlines that the implementation of this approach should not affect political imperatives or the objectives of better regulation , and emphasises that it should not lead to mechanical or mathematical decisions to repeal legislation , lower its standard or result in a chilling effect on legislation; recalls that the need for new legislation should not automatically imply that current legislation is no longer needed; calls for this approach to be based on a transparent and evidence-based methodology giving balanced consideration to all sustainability aspects , both in terms of benefits and costs , including the costs of non-compliance and inaction; calls on the commission , in this regard , to make its ‘one in , one out’ calculator public before applying this approach; ### 12. takes note of the ‘one in , one out’ approach by which the commission aims to offset newly introduced burdens by relieving citizens and businesses of equivalent burdens at eu level in the same policy area; regrets the unilateral introduction of this approach by the commission , without a prior impact assessment or consultation; underlines that the implementation of this approach should not affect political imperatives or the objectives of better regulation , and emphasises that it should not lead to mechanical or mathematical decisions to repeal legislation , lower its standard or result in a chilling effect on legislation; takes the view that that regulation should be improved on the basis of qualitative rather than quantitative aspects; recalls that the need for new legislation should not automatically imply that current legislation is no longer needed; calls for this approach to be based on a transparent and evidence-based methodology giving balanced consideration to all sustainability aspects , both in terms of benefits and costs , including the costs of non-compliance and inaction; calls on the commission , in this regard , to make its ‘one in , one out’ calculator public and to obtain the support of the other eu institutions before applying this approach;


### 2. congratulates emily o’reilly on her remarkable work to enhance the openness , accountability and integrity of the eu institutions , bodies , offices and agencies , thereby safeguarding citizens’ fundamental rights , in particular in a tragic year marked by the devastating consequences of the outbreak of the covid-19 pandemic; ### 2. congratulates emily o’reilly on her remarkable work to enhance the openness , accountability and integrity of the eu institutions , bodies , offices and agencies , thereby safeguarding citizens’ fundamental rights , in particular in a tragic year marked by the devastating consequences of the outbreak of the covid-19 pandemic; recalls that transparency is enshrined in rule of law and represents a key principle for a participative democracy;


### 16. criticises the decision of those member states , which held the presidency of the council , to use corporate sponsorship , as it caused serious damages to the eu’s image , stressing the importance for the future to refrain from any sponsorship; considers paramount the adoption of the most stringent rules preventing such practices from taking place with a view to safeguarding the reputation and integrity of the council and of the eu as a whole; ### 16. criticises the decision of those member states , which held the presidency of the council , to use corporate sponsorship , as it caused serious damages to the eu’s image , stressing the importance for the future to refrain from any sponsorship; considers paramount the adoption of the most stringent rules preventing such practices from taking place with a view to safeguarding the reputation and integrity of the council and of the eu as a whole; calls on the member states to fully comply their obligation to collaborate with the ombudsman


### 3. notes that there is a mismatch between citizens’ expectations as to the eu institutions’ powers to solve individual problems and the limitations the treaties impose on the eu institutions; so as to prevent situations in which the public have unrealistic expectations and then feel disappointed in the eu institutions , calls for more information to be provided to citizens on the union’s competences and the limits of the right to petition; ### 3. notes that there is a mismatch between citizens’ expectations as to the eu institutions’ powers to solve individual problems and the limitations the treaties impose on the eu institutions , which is enhanced by the narrow approach of the european commission on its own competences; so as to prevent situations in which the public have unrealistic expectations and then legitimately feel disappointed in the eu institutions , calls for more information to be provided to citizens on the union’s competences and the limits of the right to petition;


### 5. draws attention to the potential that the right to petition has when it comes to warning the eu institutions about possible loopholes in union law , or breaches or poor implementation thereof , both systemically and as regards specific cases; calls on the commission , as guardian of the treaties , to pay closer attention to the issues raised in petitions and to ensure that they give rise to proper inquiries so that genuine improvements can be made; emphasises that , in cases where the commission does not have legislative powers , the commission still has and should use the possibility to act by providing coordination or support; ### 5. draws attention to the potential that the right to petition has when it comes to warning the eu institutions about possible loopholes in union law , or breaches or poor implementation thereof , both systemically and as regards specific cases; regrets the lack of attention to individual petitions by the commission , despite of their potential as a tool for control and improvement of eu law; calls on the commission , as guardian of the treaties , to pay closer attention to the issues raised in petitions and to ensure that they give rise to proper inquiries so that genuine improvements can be made; emphasises that , in cases where the commission does not have legislative powers , the commission still has and should use the possibility to act by providing coordination or support;


### 30. calls on the commission to improve the eci tool to make citizens’ participation more accessible , given the low number of ecis that have ultimately been successful; ### 30. calls on the commission to improve the eci tool to make citizens’ participation more accessible , given the low number of ecis that have ultimately been successful; regrets that so far the majority of successful ecis did not end with a legislative proposal by the commission; therefore calls on the commission to initiate a legislative proposal on the basis of any successful eci that was supported by the european parliament;


### 37. calls on the member states to make it mandatory for pupils in schools to be taught about the eu’s three participatory instruments; points out that civic engagement among young people is vital for the future of all democracies; ### 37. recommends the member states to allow students in high schools to be taught a general knowledge of the european union law , the european institutions work and the three participatory instruments , in order for them to be conscient of the eu decision making process and to know how to participate actively; points out that civic engagement among young people is vital for the future of all democracies;


### 8. stresses the need to consult and actively involve organisations of persons with disabilities in each stage of planning , adoption , implementation and monitoring of all types of measures so that these measures do not lead to the violation of their fundamental rights; welcomes the commission’s commitment to involve organisations of persons with disabilities in the implementation of the european disability strategy 2021-2030; ### 8. stresses the need to consult and actively involve organisations of persons with disabilities in each stage of planning , adoption , implementation and monitoring of all types of measures so that these measures ensure the promotion of their fundamental rights; welcomes the commission’s commitment to involve organisations of persons with disabilities in the implementation of the european disability strategy 2021-2030;


### 12. notes the commission’s proposal for the creation of the ‘accessibleeu’ resource centre by 2022; calls on the commission to create an eu agency on accessibility (‘eu access board’) that would be in charge of developing technical specifications on accessibility in support of specific eu policies and legislation , carrying out consultations with rights-holders and stakeholders , helping member states and eu institutions to implement accessibility in a harmonised way for the benefit of the single market , and raising awareness of the importance of accessibility for inclusive societies; ### 12. notes the commission’s proposal for the creation of the ‘accessibleeu’ resource centre by 2022; calls on the commission to create an eu agency on accessibility (‘eu access board’) that would be in charge of developing technical specifications on accessibility in support of specific eu policies and legislation , carrying out consultations with rights-holders , stakeholders and ngos , helping member states and eu institutions to implement accessibility in a harmonised way for the benefit of the single market , and raising awareness of the importance of accessibility for equal societies;


### 13. regrets the fact that access to the built environment and physical accessibility were not included within the scope of the european accessibility act; calls on the commission to use the european accessibility act as a basis for adopting a robust eu framework for an accessible and inclusive environment with fully accessible public spaces , services , including public transport , communication and financial services , and the built environment; ### 13. regrets the fact that access to the built environment and physical accessibility were not included within the scope of the european accessibility act; calls on the commission to use the european accessibility act as a basis for adopting a robust eu framework for an accessible and equal environment with fully accessible public spaces , services , including public transport , communication and financial services , and the built environment;


### 14. calls on the member states to ensure the swift implementation at all levels of directive 2016/2102 on the accessibility of public sector bodies’ websites and mobile applications , in order to guarantee that persons with disabilities are able to access all information they require in an accessible format; welcomes the commission’s initiative for an action plan on web accessibility for all eu institutions , bodies and agencies with a view to ensuring the compliance of eu websites , and the documents published on these websites and online platforms , with european accessibility standards; urges all eu institutions , bodies and agencies to comply with the european accessibility standards as quickly as possible; ### 14. calls on the member states to ensure the swift and efficient implementation at all levels of directive 2016/2102 on the accessibility of public sector bodies’ websites and mobile applications , in order to guarantee that persons with disabilities are able to access all information they require in an accessible format; welcomes the commission’s initiative for an action plan on web accessibility for all eu institutions , bodies and agencies with a view to ensuring the compliance of eu websites , and the documents published on these websites and online platforms , with european accessibility standards which need to be broadened; urges all eu institutions , bodies and agencies to comply with the european accessibility standards in 2022 at the latest;


### 16. notes that there is no mutual recognition of disability status between member states; calls on the member states to work together in a spirit of mutual trust to recognise the status assigned in another member state; emphasises the commission’s goal of working with member states to expand the scope of the mutual recognition of disability status in areas such as labour mobility and the benefits related to the conditions of service provision; ### 16. notes that there is no mutual recognition of disability status between member states; calls on the member states to work together in a spirit of mutual trust to recognise the status assigned in another member state; emphasises the commission’s goal of working with member states to expand the scope of the mutual recognition of disability status in areas such as labour mobility and the benefits related to the conditions of service provision; underlines the need to extend the benefits of the eu disability card so that mutually recognized health access benefits are also included;


### 17. stresses the urgent need for eu legislation aimed at protecting citizens against all forms of discrimination in the eu; urges the member states to adopt the eu horizontal anti-discrimination directive tabled by the commission in 2008; calls on the commission to present an alternative solution in order to move forward in tackling discrimination across the eu , in all areas of life , as soon as possible; ### 17. stresses the urgent need for eu legislation aimed at protecting citizens against all forms of discrimination in the eu , considers it to be a primordial legislative act for a correct implementation of crpd policies; urges the member states to adopt the eu horizontal anti-discrimination directive tabled by the commission in 2008; calls on the commission to present an alternative solution in order to move forward in tackling discrimination across the eu , in all areas of life , as soon as possible;


### 18. strongly condemns all medical discrimination against persons with disabilities; recalls that the relevant measures adopted by the member states must comply with the crpd and must ensure equal and non-discriminatory access to healthcare and social services; stresses that persons with disabilities deserve the same medical treatment as any other person , including intensive medical care , also during health crises such as the covid-19 pandemic; ### 18. strongly condemns all medical discrimination against persons with disabilities; recalls that the relevant measures adopted by the member states must comply with the crpd and must ensure equal and non-discriminatory access to healthcare and social services; stresses that persons with disabilities deserve the same medical treatment as any other person , including intensive medical care; recalls the importance for health public services to always play a main role for the protection of persons with disabilities;


### 22. calls on the commission to conduct further research into the impact and health-related effects of led lights , in particular on photosensitive persons and persons with disabilities; ### 22. calls on the commission to conduct further research into the impact and health-related effects of emerging technologies on persons with disabilities , such as the case of led lights on photosensitive persons;


### 23. welcomes the fact that member states are willing to implement inclusive educational policies , but calls on them to further increase their education systems’ capacity to provide high-quality inclusive education for all learners , and calls on the commission to strengthen the role of the child guarantee in ensuring the inclusion of children with disabilities; ### 23. calls on member states to further increase their education systems’ capacity to provide high-quality accessible education for all learners , by promoting specific measures and personalized support , such as accessible and tailored curricula and learning materials , accessible information and communication technologies , as well as appropriate digital education , not only for persons with disabilities but for future teachers as well; and calls on the commission to strengthen the role of the child guarantee in ensuring the equal treatment of children with disabilities; therefore , calls on the commission and the member states to invest in training professionals regarding the needs of persons with disabilities;


### b. whereas approximately 1 % of all petitions received each year by the committee on petitions relate to various disability issues; whereas social protection and employment rights , use of the european structural and investment funds in compliance with eu regulations and the un convention on the rights of persons with disabilities (un crpd) , and other issues falling within the competences of the committee on employment and social affairs , are among the most common disability equality concerns voiced in the petitions received by parliament; ### b. whereas there are around 87 million people with disabilities in europe1a and approximately 1 % of all petitions received each year by the committee on petitions relate to various disability issues , which reveal the difficulties encountered by persons with disabilities and the fact that they face discrimination and obstacles in everyday life and do not enjoy the fundamental freedoms and rights laid down in the un convention on the rights of persons with disabilities (crpd); whereas social protection and employment rights , use of the european structural and investment funds in compliance with eu regulations and the un convention on the rights of persons with disabilities (un crpd) , and other issues falling within the competences of the committee on employment and social affairs , are among the most common disability equality concerns voiced in the petitions received by parliament;


### c. whereas it is generally acknowledged that persons with disabilities continue to face multiple obstacles and discrimination in everyday life and that they do not enjoy the fundamental freedoms and rights laid down in numerous eu and un documents , such as mutual recognition of disability status between member states , access to public transport , accessibility of the built environment , use of sign languages , financing of and equal access to education and vocational training , access to personal assistance and community inclusion; ### c. whereas it is generally acknowledged that persons with disabilities continue to face multiple obstacles and discrimination in everyday life and that they are deprived of their fundamental freedoms and rights laid down in numerous eu and un documents , such as mutual recognition of disability status between member states , access to the open labour market and to work on an equal basis with others , access to public transport , accessibility of the built environment , use of sign languages , financing of and equal access to education , vocational training and culture and sport , access to personal assistance and community inclusion;


### 1. highlights that the rule of law is an essential precondition for compliance with the principle of sound financial management and for the protection of the union’s financial interests , which can only be ensured if public authorities act in accordance with the law , if cases of fraud , corruption , conflicts of interest or other breaches of the law are pursued effectively by investigative and prosecution services , if national courts are independent , and if the decisions of the court of justice of the european union are respected; ### 1. highlights that the rule of law is an essential precondition for compliance with the principle of sound financial management and for the protection of the union’s financial interests , which can only be ensured if public authorities act in accordance with the law , if cases of fraud , tax fraud , tax evasion , corruption , conflicts of interest or other breaches of the law are pursued effectively by investigative and prosecution services , if national courts are independent , and if the decisions of the court of justice of the european union are respected;


### a. whereas the union is founded on the values set out in article 2 of the treaty on european union (teu); whereas democracy , the rule of law and fundamental rights are mutually reinforcing values which , when undermined , may pose a systemic threat to the union; ### a. whereas the union is founded on the values set out in article 2 of the treaty on european union (teu); whereas democracy , the rule of law and fundamental rights are mutually reinforcing values which , when undermined , may pose a systemic threat to the union; whereas respect of the rule of law binds the union as a whole , its member states and their subnational entities;


### b. whereas the annual rule of law review cycle is a welcome addition to the tools available to preserve the union’s values , by addressing the situation in all eu member states based on four pillars , with a direct bearing on respect for the rule of law; whereas it is intended as a yearly cycle to ensure the rule of law and to prevent problems from emerging or deepening; ### b. whereas the annual rule of law review cycle is a welcome addition to the tools available to preserve the values enshrined in article 2 teu , by addressing the situation in all eu member states based on four pillars , with a direct bearing on respect for the rule of law;


### 6. highlights the importance of supporting and strengthening cooperation between the eu institutions , the member states and , in particular , the european anti-fraud office (olaf) and the european public prosecutor’s office (eppo) in the fight against corruption; ### 6. highlights the importance of supporting and strengthening cooperation between the eu institutions , the member states and , in particular , the european anti-fraud office (olaf) and the european public prosecutor’s office (eppo) in the fight against corruption; welcomes in this regard that the revised olaf regulation promotes a better follow-up of olaf’s recommendations by the member states as well as an enhanced admissibility of olaf reports in national judicial and administrative proceedings;


### 7. reiterates that regulation (eu , euratom) 2020/2092 has been in force since 1 january 2021 and is not subject to the adoption of any guidelines or judicial interpretation. ### 7. reiterates that regulation (eu , euratom) 2020/2092 has been in force and applicable since 1 january 2021 and is not subject to the adoption of any guidelines or judicial interpretation.


### 1. underlines that in all proceedings concerning the child’s well-being and future life arrangements , the rights of the child should be respected and implemented in full and the best interests of the child should be given priority; ### 1. underlines that in all proceedings concerning the child’s well-being and future life arrangements , the rights of the child should be respected and implemented in full and the best interests of the child are appropriately integrated and consistently applied in every action taken by public institutions , especially in judicial proceedings , which directly and indirectly impact on children;


### 6. recalls that the authorities of the member states must ensure that a child is given the genuine and effective opportunity to express their own views freely during proceedings and that due weight is given to the child’s views in accordance with their age and maturity; ### 6. recalls that the authorities of the member states must ensure that a child is given the genuine and effective opportunity to participate and express their own views freely during any legal proceedings affecting them ; this should apply unconditionally , whether in a cross-border dispute , in divorce proceedings , in family reunification or in the examination of an asylum application;


### l. whereas every child has a right to know and be cared for by their parents; whereas in the case of separation , every child has a right to maintain personal relations and direct contact with both parents on a regular basis , unless it is contrary to the child’s best interests; ### l. whereas the best interests of the child should always be the primary consideration in all decisions concerning children and whereas every child has a right to know and be cared for by their parents; whereas in the case of separation , every child has a right to maintain personal relations and direct contact with both parents on a regular basis; whereas the personal relations and direct contacts of the child with its parents may be restricted only to protect the best interests of the child;


### 1. believes that a single independent eu ethics body is necessary to ensure the consistent and full implementation of ethics standards across the eu institutions; proposes the conclusion of an interinstitutional agreement (iia) to set up an eu ethics body for parliament and the commission open to the participation of all eu institutions , agencies and bodies; recommends that the iia contain the following provisions: ### 1. considers that the best way to strengthen , or restore , citizens’ trust in the european institutions is to apply high standards of transparency and accountability; believes that a single independent eu ethics body is necessary to ensure the consistent and full implementation of ethics standards across the eu institutions; considers that the conclusion of an interinstitutional agreement to set up an eu ethics body would risk limiting its scope to parliament and the commission; is concerned that other less virtuous institutions , agencies and bodies may not , on a voluntary basis , participate in an independent ethics body; considers it appropriate to revise the treaties in order for participation in such an independent ethics body to be binding on all eu institutions , agencies and bodies; stresses that the convention on the future of europe is an opportunity for european citizens to debate a possible treaty change which would include a binding requirement for all eu institutions to establish such an independent ethics body;


### 1. notes that within the eu institutions different legislative measures aimed at preventing conflicts of interest contain varying definitions of the term ‘conflict of interest’; believes therefore that the term should be understood to mean a conflict between the public duty and private interests of a public official , in which the public official has private-capacity interests which could improperly influence the performance of their official duties and responsibilities; notes , however , that a definition of this kind has an evolving nature and that full transparency does not necessarily guarantee the absence of any conflict of interest , nor does it guarantee public trust; ### 1. notes that within the eu institutions different legislative measures aimed at preventing conflicts of interest contain varying definitions of the term ‘conflict of interest’; believes therefore that the term should be understood to mean a conflict between the public duty and private interests of a public official , in which the public official has private-capacity interests which could improperly influence the performance of their official duties and responsibilities; considers that applying the highest transparency standards is the best way to restore citizens’ trust in eu institutions;


### 1. recalls its resolution of 16 january 2020 on institutions and bodies of the economic and monetary union: preventing post-public employment conflicts of interest1 ; ### 1. recalls its resolution of 16 january 2020 on institutions and bodies of the economic and monetary union: preventing post-public employment conflicts of interest1; recalls this resolution supported the proposal of the president of the commission to create an eu independent ethics body common to all eu institutions to taking decisions related to conflicts of interests;


### b. whereas the ethical standards applicable to the european institutions are in many respects ahead of those applicable in their national equivalents but have not been enforced in a satisfactory manner , particularly in parliament where , in spite of there having been at least 27 breaches of the code of conduct , no procedure has ever led to any sanction; ### b. whereas the ethical standards applicable to the european institutions are in many respects ahead of those applicable in their national equivalents but have not been enforced in a satisfactory manner , particularly in parliament where , in spite of there having been at least 27 breaches of the code of conduct , no procedure has ever led to any sanction; whereas an independent body with investigative , seizure and sanctioning powers is necessary in order for the eu’s ambition of being ethical and transparent to be truly effective;


### c. whereas the shortcomings of the current eu ethics framework derive largely from the fact that it relies on a self-regulatory approach and lacks adequate human and financial resources and competences to verify information; ### c. whereas the shortcomings of the current eu ethics framework derive largely from the fact that it relies on a self-regulatory approach and lacks adequate human and financial resources and competences to verify information; whereas this independent ethics body is essential for restoring trust in the european institutions and their democratic legitimacy; whereas the adoption of the lisbon treaty in 2007 , despite the rejection by referendum in france and the netherlands of the treaty establishing a constitution for europe in 2005 , has significantly undermined citizens’ trust in the european institutions;


### d. whereas , as a consequence , multiple cases of unethical conduct and their inadequate handling by the eu institutions have harmed the trust which european citizens place in the eu institutions; ### d. whereas , as a consequence , multiple cases of unethical conduct and their inadequate handling by the eu institutions have harmed the trust which european citizens place in the eu institutions; whereas the european ombudsman recommended in 2018 , in the wake of mr barroso joining goldman sachs , that the commission grant its ethics committee the power to act on its own initiative whenever it considers it appropriate1 a; whereas the commission has not taken the necessary measures to follow up the ombudsman’s recommendations on the obligation to deal properly with the revolving door issue; whereas half of the former european commissioners have left to join the private sector , often without respecting the cooling-off period and other ethical criteria;


### g. whereas all lead candidates in the 2019 european elections committed to the creation of an independent ethics body common to all eu institutions; whereas the president of the commission committed to it in her political guidelines and whereas parliament has already supported this view; ### g. whereas all lead candidates in the 2019 european elections committed to the creation of an independent ethics body common to all eu institutions; whereas the president of the commission committed to it in her political guidelines and whereas parliament has already supported this view; whereas the mission letter of the vice-president of the european commission responsible for values and transparency stressed the need for such an ethics body which is ‘common to all eu institutions’; whereas the european parliament should set an example with regard to rules on ethics and their enforcement;


### 3. believes that the members and staff of the participating institutions should be covered by the agreement before , during and after the term of office or service in line with the applicable rules; considers that this should apply to members of parliament , commissioners and all eu staff falling under the scope of the staff regulation; ### 3. believes that the members and staff of all the institutions should be covered by the independent ethics body before , during and after the term of office or service in line with the applicable rules; considers that this should apply to members of parliament , commissioners and all eu staff falling under the scope of the staff regulation;


### 3. is also of the opinion that for this examination to be complete and accurate , and for the possibility of a conflict of interest to be excluded , information and documents beyond the declaration of financial interests of commissioner-designates are often essential; ### 3. is also of the opinion that for this examination to be complete and accurate , and for the possibility of a conflict of interest to be excluded , information and documents beyond the declaration of financial interests of commissioner-designates are essential; considers in this regard that the independent ethics body should be able to request from individuals under examination that they provide banking information , tax information , and any other information that may be necessary for the examination; considers that the independent ethics bodies should be given the appropriate investigative powers to be able verify the information provided; stresses that the independent ethics body should be able to impose sanctions for unjustified delays or for the refusal to provide information; further stresses that such information may remain confidential if necessary;


### 3. points out that the inherent complexities in financial regulatory policies and the information asymmetries between financial market players and public officials may make the financial sector particularly susceptible to regulatory capture; ### 3. points out that the lack of harmonized rules and framework regarding conflicts of interests within the eu and especially the economic and monetary union resulted in having very different standards from one institution to the other; points out some regulations are used to override the eu staff regulation , as it is currently the case for the chairman of the eba;


### 4. insists that the iia should be open to the participation of all eu institutions and bodies; believes that the iia should allow the ethics body to conclude agreements with national authorities with a view to ensuring the exchange of information necessary for the performance of its tasks; ### 4. insists that this independent ethics body should be mandatory for all eu institutions and bodies; believes that the ethics body should be able to conclude agreements with national authorities with a view to ensuring the exchange of information necessary for the performance of its tasks;


### 4. believes therefore that the committee on legal affairs should be given sufficient time to evaluate possible conflicts of interest; further believes that it should be provided with sufficient resources , tools and skills to cross-check and locate necessary information; ### 4. believes therefore that the committee on legal affairs in cooperation with the independent ethics body should be given sufficient time to evaluate possible conflicts of interest; further believes that it should be provided with sufficient resources , tools and skills to cross-check and locate necessary information;


### 4. calls for a strengthening of the existing regulatory and enforcement framework for both pre-public and post-public employment conflicts of interest , in order to establish appropriate boundaries between the public sector and the private and non-profit sectors; welcomes in this regard the work done by the organisation for economic co-operation and development , the european court of auditors and the european ombudsman; ### 4. calls for a strengthening of the existing regulatory and enforcement framework for both pre-public and post-public employment conflicts of interest , in order to establish appropriate boundaries between the public and the private sectors; welcomes in this regard the work done by the organisation for economic co-operation and development , the european court of auditors , the council of europe's group of states against corruption and the european ombudsman;


### 4. calls for a strengthening of the existing regulatory and enforcement framework for both pre-public and post-public employment conflicts of interest , in order to establish appropriate boundaries between the public sector and the private and non-profit sectors; welcomes in this regard the work done by the organisation for economic co-operation and development , the european court of auditors and the european ombudsman; ### 4. calls for a strengthening of the existing regulatory and enforcement framework for both pre-public and post-public employment conflicts of interest , in order to establish appropriate boundaries between the public sector and the private and non-profit sectors; welcomes in this regard the work done by the organisation for economic co-operation and development , the european court of auditors and the european ombudsman; points out the lack of alignment of the eu ethics rules with the oecd guidelines for managing conflict of interest in the public service; notes the oecd guidelines recommended the creation of a central function responsible for the development and maintenance of the conflict-of-interest policy and procedure , that could take the form of an independent agency; underlines the european ombudsman has been handling conflicts-of-interest complains in the absence of a mechanism dedicated to this task on top of its other missions , and without having the proper means and power to enforce its decisions;


### 5. considers that the participating institutions should entrust the eu ethics body with monitoring powers over ethics standards , as well as advisory , investigative and enforcement powers; ### 5. considers that all the participating institutions should entrust the eu ethics body with monitoring powers over ethics standards , as well as advisory powers , the power to investigate on its own initiative and enforcement powers;


### 5. considers that , given the sophisticated and complex nature of this responsibility , the establishment of a possible conflict of interest should be de-politicised and performed in an independent and systematic way with the assistance of a body with the relevant expertise and experience; ### 5. considers that , given the sophisticated and complex nature of this responsibility , the examination of a potential or actual conflicts of interest should be de-politicised and performed in an independent and systematic way by an independent body with the relevant expertise and experience; considers that it should be undertaken as on ongoing exercise , with annual updates of the declarations of interests and the possibility for the independent ethics body to issue sanctions for delays or bad faith in the provision of information and updates of information;


### 5. recommends empowering the european anti-fraud office or the european ombudsman with the responsibility to carry out oversight of conflicts of interest , revolving doors and lobby transparency for eu institutions and agencies; ### 5. recommends , therefore , the creation of an eu independent ethics body with a broad mandate to carry out oversight , and decision regarding of conflicts of interest , revolving doors and lobby transparency for eu institutions and agencies;


### 6. considers that this monitoring capacity should include the verification of the veracity of the declaration of financial interests , the handling of conflicts of interest , checks on transparency obligations and the verification of compliance with revolving doors rules; ### 6. considers that this monitoring capacity should include the verification of the veracity of the declaration of financial interests , the handling of conflicts of interest , checks on transparency obligations and the verification of compliance with revolving doors rules , as well as the possibility for the independent ethics body to impose penalties in the event of delay or bad faith in the provision of information and updates of information in declarations;


### 6. considers that for proper expertise to be acquired , the future ethics body should have a permanent , independent and collegiate structure , and that its composition could be based either on specific institutional positions , such as that of the president of the court of justice , or on the nomination of experts by each eu institution; ### 6. considers that for proper expertise to be acquired , the independent ethics body should have a permanent , independent and collegiate structure , and that its composition could be based on specific institutional positions , such as that of the president of the court of justice , and on the nomination of experts by each eu institution and relevant bodies such as the european ombudsman , the olaf , the european court of auditors , and on the participation of civil society organisations specialised in ethics , transparency and independence in public policy making;


### 6. recognises the need to strike a delicate balance between regulating conflicts of interest , respecting the individual right to economic freedom , and maintaining a dynamic labour market with mobility between the public sector and the private and non-profit sectors; ### 6. stresses that the need to strike a delicate balance between regulating conflicts of interest and respecting the individual right to economic freedom has resulted in a loophole in the eu ethics rules; underlines this is the very loophole that justified adam farkas’s move from the eba to afme; calls on a revision of the eu ethics rules to close this loophole and make sure that if a planned job move constitutes a conflict of interest , it cannot be granted and must be blocked by the eu independent ethics body;


### 6. recognises the need to strike a delicate balance between regulating conflicts of interest , respecting the individual right to economic freedom , and maintaining a dynamic labour market with mobility between the public sector and the private and non-profit sectors; ### 6. recognises the need to implement strong norms regulating conflicts of interest , while introducing measures which mitigate limitations to the individual right to economic freedom , such as posting information to job applicants about the conflict of interest regime and any future employment restrictions;


### 7. takes the view that the eu ethics body could also be given authority over the obligations imposed by the transparency register; ### 7. takes the view that the eu ethics body could also be given authority over the obligations imposed by the transparency register; considers , therefore , that the independent ethics body should have the power to carry out checks on the basis of records or on the spot in order to monitor compliance with the reporting obligations of lobbyists; considers that the ethics body should have the power to impose penalties on interest representatives involved in a breach of ethical rules; stresses that the transparency bodies or authorities of the member states have the capacity to impose financial penalties on lobbyists who fail to comply with their transparency obligations , and do so very effectively , without bureaucracy undermining that effectiveness;


### 7. recommends therefore that , while fully keeping its competence on the matter , the committee on legal affairs decide on the existence of a conflict of interest after having received a non-binding recommendation by such an independent expert advisory body; ### 7. underlines however that the assessment of the independence of commissioner-designates remains a political and institutional competence of the european parliament; recommends therefore that , while fully keeping its competence on the matter , the committee on legal affairs decide on the existence of a conflict of interest after having received public , non-binding , precise and motivated recommendations by such an independent expert advisory body; considers that the committee on legal affairs should ultimately hold a debate and vote on the recommendations issued by the independent ethics body; stresses that this decision of the committee on legal affairs should be publicly motivated and taken by roll-call vote;


### 7. is of the view that any prohibition of a professional move should be justified on a case-by-case basis , and might , where appropriate , require a temporary allowance to be granted during a cooling-off period , until the new job is taken up. ### 7. is of the view that the eu independent ethics body should also be mandated to control conditions and lobby bans imposed on eu staff; stressed the eu ethics rules need to be revised to extend both the notification and cooling off-periods;


### 7. is of the view that any prohibition of a professional move should be justified on a case-by-case basis , and might , where appropriate , require a temporary allowance to be granted during a cooling-off period , until the new job is taken up. ### 7. is of the view that “cooling-off” periods are justified legal measures for certain professions in the public sphere in order to protect the public interest and integrity of public bodies; temporary allowances can bridge the time before finding an appropriate job;


### 8. considers that the eu ethics body should have the power to initiate procedures and to conduct investigations based on the information it has collected or that it has received from third parties; ### 8. considers that the eu ethics body should have the power to initiate procedures by itself and to conduct on-the-spot and records-based investigations based on the information it has collected or that it has received from third parties , such as journalists , ngos , whistleblowers , stakeholders , civil society or the european ombudsman; insists that any third party referring a matter to the independent ethics body must be protected and their identity kept anonymous;


### 8. believes furthermore that this future advisory body could also be entrusted with the broader task of examining conflicts of interest within the eu institutions and agencies in general , playing , in a complementary and balanced way , a preventive role via awareness raising and ethical guidance powers on the one hand , and a compliance role on the other. ### 8. believes furthermore that this future advisory body could also be entrusted with the broader task of examining conflicts of interest within the eu institutions , including the european parliament , and eu agencies in general , playing , in a complementary and balanced way , a preventive role via awareness raising and ethical guidance powers on the one hand , and a compliance role on the other.


### 9. believes that in relation to its enforcement powers , the body could take over from the appointing authority in dealing with staff ethics obligations , and that in relation to members of parliament or commissioners , the body could be granted enforcement powers within the limits of the provisions contained in the treaties , and without prejudice to any additional mechanisms provided for in parliament’s rules of procedure , in particular concerning termination of office; ### 9. believes that in relation to its enforcement powers , the body could take over from the appointing authority in dealing with staff ethics obligations , and that in relation to members of parliament or commissioners , the body could be granted enforcement powers , and without prejudice to any additional mechanisms provided for in parliament’s rules of procedure , in particular concerning termination of office;


### 10. considers that the eu ethics body should be entrusted with advisory tasks in order to provide advice to any individual covered by its scope who wishes to request interpretation of an ethical standard in relation to appropriate conduct in a specific case; ### 10. considers that the eu ethics body should be entrusted with advisory tasks in order to provide advice to any individual or entity covered by its scope who wishes to request interpretation of an ethical standard in relation to appropriate conduct in a specific case; calls on the institutions to take advantage of the body’s expertise in the implementation of their ethical standards; considers that , in the long term , the body should harmonise the ethical standards of all the institutions , agencies and bodies;


### 12. believes that the ethics body should be composed of nine members , three selected by the commission , three elected by parliament , and three assigned de jure from among the former presidents of the court of justice of the european union (cjeu) , the court of auditors and former eu ombudsmen; ### 12. believes that the ethics body should be composed of nine members , three selected by the commission , three elected by parliament and three assigned by the council , as follows:


### 13. considers that its members must be independent , chosen on the basis of their competence , experience and professional qualities , as well as their personal integrity , have an impeccable record of ethical behaviour and provide a declaration of the absence of conflicts of interest; is of the opinion that the composition of the body should be gender-balanced; ### 13. considers that its members must be independent , chosen on the basis of their competence , experience and professional qualities , as well as their personal integrity , have an impeccable record of ethical behaviour and provide a declaration of the absence of conflicts of interest , whose accuracy and compatibility with the post will be verified by the ethics officer; calls on the ethics officer to take charge of the verification of candidates’ declarations; considers that the members should work in a spirit of collaboration and consistency in their decisions and recommendations; calls for a guarantee of gender balance in the composition of the body;


### 14. suggests that each institution choose these members in particular from among former judges of the cjeu , former or current members of highest courts of member states , former members of the european parliament , former staff of the participating institutions and bodies , former eu ombudsmen , and members of the ethics authorities in member states; suggests further that the body elect a president and two vice-presidents from among its members; ### 14. suggests that each institution choose these members in particular from among former judges of the cjeu , former presidents of olaf and the court of auditors , former or current members of highest courts of member states , former staff of the participating institutions and bodies , former eu ombudsmen , and members of the ethics authorities in member states; suggests further that the body elect a president and two vice-presidents from among its members; stresses the need to ensure the diversity of members’ backgrounds and independent expertise; suggests limiting the participation of former meps and commissioners to a third of the composition of the body; considers that the appointment of members should be validated by a two-thirds majority vote in parliament’s plenary;


### 16. proposes a two-step approach whereby , in the event that the eu ethics body becomes aware of a breach or possible breach of ethics rules , it first recommends actions to put an end to the breach; considers that this first preventive step should ensure confidentiality and the right of the person to be heard; suggests that in the event that the individual concerned refuses to take the appropriate actions , the eu ethics body should make relevant information about the case publicly available and decide , if appropriate , on sanctions; considers that this two-step approach should apply provided that there are no reasonable grounds to believe that the individual acted in bad faith and recommends that intentional breach , gross negligence , the concealment of evidence and non-compliance with the obligation to cooperate should be , as such , subject to sanctions , even when the breach itself has ceased; ### 16. proposes a two-step approach whereby , in the event that the eu ethics body becomes aware of a breach or possible breach of ethics rules , it first recommends actions to put an end to the breach; considers that this first preventive step should ensure confidentiality and the right of the person to be heard; suggests that in the event that the individual concerned refuses to take the appropriate actions , the eu ethics body should make relevant information about the case publicly available and decide , if appropriate , on sanctions; considers that this two-step approach should apply provided that there are no reasonable grounds to believe that the individual acted in bad faith and recommends that intentional breach , gross negligence , the concealment of evidence and non-compliance with the obligation to cooperate should be , as such , subject to sanctions , even when the breach itself has ceased; stresses that it is essential for the body to be able to investigate breaches of ethical rules by members of the european parliament and impose appropriate penalties , such as fines or the withholding of allowances; considers that the body should be able to investigate serious conflicts of interest arising in connection with a member’s position as rapporteur or shadow rapporteur for specific files and take appropriate and effective decisions to remedy any contentious situations;


### 2. highlights that post-public employment and ‘revolving door’ conflict of interest situations are recurring concerns that , if unaddressed , could jeopardise the enforcement of high ethical standards in the eu institutions and agencies , thus compromising their integrity and damaging citizens’ trust in them; ### 2. highlights that post-public employment and ‘revolving door’ conflict of interest situations are recurring concerns and a problem common to all institutions , bodies , offices , and agencies across the eu; notes however the multiplication of recent cases specifically within the institutions of the economic and monetary union; recalls that both the european ombudsman and the european court of auditors repeatedly warned several eu institutions about major failures in their prevention of conflict of interest policies; stresses that unaddressed conflict-of-interest situation jeopardise the enforcement of high ethical standards in the eu institutions and agencies , thus compromising their integrity and damaging citizens’ trust in them;


### d. whereas transparency in the purchase and distribution of covid-19 vaccines establishes the basis for vaccine cooperation in europe and is the key way of combating “vaccine nationalism” and direct purchases , that exacerbate a geopolitical vaccine race , in which poor countries will receive the vaccines last; ### d. whereas transparency in the purchase and distribution of covid-19 vaccines establishes the basis for vaccine cooperation in europe and is the key way of combating lack of solidarity or geopolitical use of vaccination , in which developing countries will receive the vaccines last;


### 1. points to the importance of a joint , rapid and effective response to the covid-19 pandemic as european union and as part of the global community and recognises the particular responsibility of the european union in ensuring equitable and universal access to covid-19 vaccines; ### 1. points to the importance of a joint , rapid and effective response to the covid-19 pandemic as european union and as part of the global community and recognises the particular responsibility of the european union in ensuring equitable and universal access to covid-19 vaccines; reminds that a temporary waiver of the patents on covid-19 technologies is necessary to significantly increase vaccine production in order to be able to tackle the pandemic globally;


### 2. expresses its deepest concern on the lack of transparency by the commission and member states in the development , purchase and distribution of covid-19 vaccines; ### 2. expresses its deepest regret on the lack of transparency by the commission and member states in the development , purchase and distribution of covid-19 vaccines;


### 3. calls on the commission to improve its communication of the eu strategy for covid-19 vaccines to the public; ### 3. calls on the commission to improve its communication of the eu strategy for covid-19 vaccines to the public in a clear , transparent and rigorous manner;


### 4. calls on the commission to disclose the names of experts or at the very least the list of seven member states represented in the negotiating team involved in negotiating advance purchase agreements and purchase agreements with pharmaceutical companies for the purchase of a covid-19 vaccine; ### 4. calls on the commission to disclose the names of experts and the list of seven member states represented in the negotiating team involved in negotiating advance purchase agreements and purchase agreements with pharmaceutical companies for the purchase of a covid-19 vaccine;


### 5. calls on the commission to publish non-redacted versions of the advance purchase agreements and the purchase agreement and in particular to disclose the following details: the advance payments by the commission , the cost sharing between public and private investments in the vaccines , the number of doses given to each country and to be delivered per quarter , the prices per dose , the number and locations of available production sites , the liability and compensation regimes for any harm that might be caused by the vaccines , the sanctions in case of breach of contract and information on the possible sharing of intellectual property rights; ### 5. calls on the commission to publish non-redacted versions of the advance purchase agreements and the purchase agreement and in particular to disclose the following details: the payments by the commission , the cost sharing between public and private investments in the vaccines , the number of doses given to each country and to be delivered per quarter , the prices per dose , the number and locations of available production sites , the liability and compensation regimes for any harm that might be caused by the vaccines , the sanctions in case of breach of contract and information on the possible sharing of intellectual property rights , and any information that may be relevant to the public


### 11. calls on the commission to provide strong safeguards of the availability , accessibility and affordability of covid-19 vaccines and therefore to support the indian and south african world trade organisation initiative for a temporary waiver on intellectual property rights for covid-19 vaccines , equipment and treatments and to increase its contribution to the covax initiative; ### 11. calls on the commission to set up a clear and eu global covid-19 vaccination strategy , focusing on ensuring equal , affordable and timely access to vaccination for people in developing countries , in particular those belonging to vulnerable and high-risk groups , and therefore to support the indian and south african world trade organisation initiative for a temporary waiver on intellectual property rights for covid-19 vaccines , equipment and treatments and to increase its contribution to the covax initiative;


### 1. considers that sustainable corporate governance is key to the long-term direction of undertakings and to aligning their activities to the achievement of the union’s overall environmental objectives as laid down in the european green deal , as well as the union’s 2050 climate neutrality objective , namely that all sectors should contribute to reaching that target; ### 1. considers that sustainable corporate governance is key to the long-term direction of undertakings and to aligning their activities to the achievement of the union’s overall environmental objectives as laid down in the european green deal , as well as the union’s 2030 emissions reduction and energy targets and 2050 climate neutrality objectives , namely that all sectors should contribute to reaching that target;


### 1. welcomes the commission’s commitment to reviewing the nfrd; highlights that such revision should be fully consistent with the requirements imposed by the disclosure regulation and the taxonomy regulation; calls on the commission to take into account the recommendations included in this resolution; ### 1. welcomes the commission’s commitment to reviewing the nfrd; highlights that such revision should be fully consistent with the requirements imposed by the disclosure regulation and the taxonomy regulation and with the principles of human rights and environmental due diligence outlined in the united nations guiding principles on business and human rights and the oecd guidelines for multinational enterprises; calls on the commission to take into account the recommendations included in this resolution;


### 2. emphasises that sustainable corporate governance can help the eu to build a more resilient and sustainable economy , improve the level playing field and protect eu businesses and citizens , and is therefore hugely beneficial to eu trade policy; ### 2. emphasises that sustainable corporate governance is necessary to allow the eu to build a more resilient and sustainable economy , improve the level playing field and protect eu businesses and citizens , and is therefore hugely beneficial to eu trade policy;


### 2. reiterates its call for an enlargement of the scope of the nrfd to cover all listed and non-listed large undertakings established in the union territory , as defined in article 3(4) of the accounting directive; invites the commission to identify high-risk sectors of economic activity with a significant impact on sustainability matters that could justify the inclusion of small and medium enterprises (smes) in those sectors , within the scope of the nfrd; ### 2. reiterates its call for an enlargement of the scope of the nfrd to cover all public interest entities and non-listed large undertakings governed by the law of a member state or established in the territory of the union , as defined in article 3(4) of the accounting directive; stresses the importance of including non-eu undertaking with securities listed in stock markets in the eu within the scope of the nfrd and of limited liability undertakings governed by the law of a non-member state and not established in the territory of the union that will be subject to any future eu environmental and human rights due diligence requirements by virtue of their operations in the internal market selling goods or providing services; calls the commission to identify high-risk sectors of economic activity with a significant impact on social and environmental sustainability matters in order to include small and medium enterprises (smes) in those sectors , within the scope of the nfrd;


### 3. considers that the concept of environmental matters in the nfrd should be interpreted in line with the taxonomy regulation; considers it equally important to define with precision the other sustainability matters to which the directive refers , such as the concepts of social and employee matters , respect for human rights and anti-corruption and bribery; ### 3. considers that the concept of environmental matters in the nfrd should be interpreted in line with the taxonomy regulation; considers it equally important to define with precision the other sustainability matters to which the directive refers , such as the concepts of social and employee matters , respect for human rights and anti-corruption and bribery; calls in this regard for more transparency in the publication of supplier lists , which are published by just 1% of companies at present;


### 4. notes with concern that less than 1 % of companies publicly list their suppliers , even in high-risk sectors; ### 4. notes with concern that less than 1% of companies publicly list their suppliers , even in high-risk sectors; calls for more transparency in the publication of lists of suppliers of companies;


### 4. notes with concern that less than 1 % of companies publicly list their suppliers , even in high-risk sectors; ### 4. notes with concern that less than 1 % of companies publicly list their suppliers , even in high-risk sectors and considers that this shows the necessity and urgency for authorities to act;


### 4. calls on the commission to commit to developing such standards during the upcoming review of the non-financial reporting directive; ### 4. calls on the commission to commit to developing such standards during the upcoming review of the non-financial reporting directive; underlines that employees should be fully involved in these reports , given that they know better than anybody the sanitary and environmental risks , as they are exposed to them every day;


### 4. considers that the definition of materiality should include the issues that affect long-term value creation and matters beyond the purely financial performance of companies; ### 4. considers that the definition of materiality should refer to the issues that affect long-term value creation and matters beyond the financial performance of companies , in line with the double materiality principle introduced by the nfrd and further explained in the european commission guidelines on climate-related reporting; underlines in this regard that the new nfr legislation should clarify that companies should disclose both the process by which they have conducted their materiality assessment including information on consulted stakeholders , as well as the information concerning their actual and foreseeable severe impacts , including those that are caused or contributed to by a company , or directly connected to its activities , products or services by business relationships , as well as the information determined by companies as relevant from the perspective of management of the risks posed to them by sustainability matters; considers that the assessment of materiality should be carried out by companies with the full involvement of workers’ representatives and trade unions;


### 5. stresses that directors’ duties should encompass an obligation to develop , disclose and implement a corporate sustainability strategy for all aspects of the company’s operations , including its supply chains; ### 5. stresses that directors’ duties should encompass an obligation to develop , disclose and implement a corporate sustainability strategy for all aspects of the company’s operations , including its supply chains with a sanctions based mechanism;


### 5. further considers that consistency of eu legislation on sustainable corporate governance should be achieved through the introduction of concrete obligations to be carried out and not only the obligation to report information; ### 5. further considers that consistency of eu legislation on sustainable corporate governance should be achieved through the introduction of concrete obligations and quantified objectives to be carried out and not only the obligation to report information;


### 6. stresses that the requirement to disclose information on how sustainability issues affect the company and how the company affects society and the environment should include the sharing of all relevant information on all actors throughout the entire supply chain; ### 6. stresses that the requirement to disclose information on how sustainability issues affect the company and how the company affects society and the environment should include the sharing of all necessary information on all actors throughout the entire supply chain;


### 6. considers that the location of the non-financial statement should be harmonised; calls on the commission to establish a publicly accessible eu-wide digital platform that is free of charge , on which companies should publish their non-financial information; ### 6. considers that the location of the non-financial statement should be harmonised; calls on the commission to establish a publicly accessible eu-wide digital platform that is free of charge , on which companies should publish their non-financial information , building notably on the related recommendations of the high-level forum on the capital markets union; considers that in each country where the company operates , non-financial information should be available in local official languages;


### 7. notes that sustainable corporate governance cannot reach its full potential without due diligence legislation that requires companies to identify , prevent , mitigate and account for human rights abuses and environmental damage in their global value chains. ### 7. notes that sustainable corporate governance cannot work efficiently without due diligence legislation that requires companies to identify , prevent , mitigate and account for human rights abuses and environmental damage in their global value chains.


### f. whereas stakeholders have often expressed that the non-financial information provided by companies pursuant to the nfrd is insufficient , unreliable and not comparable; whereas disclosure of more complete and reliable information is necessary so that companies can be held accountable for their potential adverse impacts on the environment and society; ### f. whereas stakeholders and studies have often expressed that the non-financial information provided by companies pursuant to the nfrd is insufficient , unreliable and not comparable; ; whereas preparers have expressed confusion with the multiplicity of voluntary reporting frameworks and called for legal clarification and standardization; whereas disclosure of more complete and reliable information is necessary so that companies can be held accountable for their potential adverse impacts on the environment and society;


### g. whereas companies’ directors have the legal and statutory duty to act in the interest of the company; whereas an excessive focus on short-term profit maximisation has an adverse impact on companies’ long-term performances and on sustainability , and therefore may be to the detriment of shareholders’ interest; ### g. whereas companies’ directors have the legal and statutory duty to act in the interest of the company and the duty to respect to human rights , social rights , workers’ and trade unions’ rights and the environment; whereas , however , the interpretation and implementation of this duty is hampered by the shareholder primacy norms and the undue short-term market pressures; whereas an excessive focus on short-term profit maximisation has an adverse impact on companies’ long-term performances and on the sustainability of their operations with regards to planet boundaries , human rights and the imperative to address the causes of climate change , and therefore is be to the detriment of peoples’ social , environmental and economic interests , and incidentally to long-term shareholders’ interest;


### h. whereas the consistency of eu legislation on sustainable corporate governance should be achieved through the establishment of concrete obligations to do and not only to report information; whereas an additional framework defining company boards’ duties in terms of sustainability is therefore necessary; ### h. whereas the consistency of eu legislation on sustainable corporate governance should be achieved through the establishment of concrete obligations to act and not only to report information; whereas it is necessary that the legislative proposal includes two distinct proposals on corporate due diligence and defining company boards’ duties in terms of sustainability is therefore necessary;


### 9. urges the council to initiate without delay negotiations with parliament on the proposal for a directive on improving the gender balance among non-executive directors of companies listed on stock exchanges and related measures (com(2012)0614) (‘the women on boards proposal’) , which sets out to put an end to the pervasive imbalance between women and men at the highest-levels of decision-making in companies; ### 9. urges the council to initiate without delay negotiations with parliament on the proposal for a directive on improving the gender balance among non-executive directors of companies listed on stock exchanges and related measures (com(2012)0614) (‘the women on boards proposal’) , which sets out to put an end to the pervasive imbalance between women and men at the highest-levels of decision-making in companies; calls on the commission to examine additional proposition to improve gender balance among senior managers and influential positions in companies;


### 10. notes the major role of directors in defining a company’s strategy and overseeing its operations; considers that directors should have a duty to integrate long-term interests and sustainability risks , impacts , opportunities and dependencies in the overall strategy of the company; ### 10. notes the major role of directors in defining a company’s strategy and overseeing its operations; underlines the responsibilities induced by the position of power of company managers vis-à-vis internal and external stakeholders in the company's activities; considers that directors should have a duty , clearly defined and accompanied by adequate sanctions , to integrate the interests of the company’s stakeholders , including workers and local communities , the long-term interests and sustainability risks , impacts , opportunities and dependencies in the overall strategy of the company;


### 11. calls on the commission to present a legislative proposal ensuring that members of the administrative , management and supervisory bodies of limited liability companies , acting within the competences assigned to them by national law , have collective responsibility for defining , disclosing and monitoring a corporate sustainability strategy; ### 11. calls on the commission to present a legislative proposal to ensure that directors have a duty to act in the interest of the company’s sustainability in the long-term as well as in the interest of workers , other stakeholders and society , and not only nor primarily in the interest of shareholders , ensuring that members of the administrative , management and supervisory bodies of limited liability companies , acting within the competences assigned to them by national law , have collective responsibility for defining , disclosing and monitoring a corporate sustainability strategy; and ensuring that sufficient reserves through adequate retained earnings are made available for the implementation of such strategy;


### 12. considers that the sustainability strategy should identify and address , in line with companies’ due diligence obligations , the significant impacts that the company might have on environmental , climate , social and employee matters , respect for human rights and anti-corruption and bribery matters connected to the company’s business model , operations and supply chains , including outside the european union; considers that the duty of care that directors owe to the company requires also taking into consideration the interest of stakeholders who may be adversely impacted by the company’s activities; ### 12. notes that the commission must clearly separate corporate mandatory obligations to carry out due diligence and directors’ duty of care owed to the company to ensure its long-term viability and sustainability; considers that the sustainability strategy should be coherent with the significant impacts identified , in line with companies’ due diligence obligations on one hand and the determination of material issues in line with the non-financial reporting requirements on the other hand , including , the significant impacts that the company might have on environmental , climate , social , workers and trade unions matters , respect for human rights and anti-corruption and bribery matters connected to the company’s business model , operations and supply chains , including outside the european union; considers that the duty of care that directors owe to the company requires also taking into consideration the interest of stakeholders who may be adversely impacted by the company’s activities;


### 13. further considers that the sustainability strategy should include measurable , specific , time-bound and science-based targets aligned with the union’s commitments at international level on the environment , climate change , particularly the paris agreement , biodiversity , and deforestation; stresses that it should also include policies on gender equality , the better integration of employee’s rights in the business activities and a definition of a fair salary policy , and sector-specific and/or geographical matters; believes that the variable part of the remuneration of directors should be linked to the achievement of the measurable targets set in the company’s sustainability strategy; ### 13. further considers that the sustainability strategy should include measurable , specific , time-bound and science-based targets as well as social and environmental transition plans aligned with the union’s commitments at international level on the environment , climate change , particularly the paris agreement , biodiversity , and deforestation; stresses that it should also include policies on gender equality , the better integration of employee’s rights in the business activities and a definition of a fair salary policy , and sector-specific and/or geographical matters; believes that the variable part of the remuneration of directors should be linked to the achievement of the measurable targets set in the company’s sustainability strategy;


### 14. considers that , in the process of defining and monitoring their sustainability strategy , companies should engage with all relevant stakeholders , including shareholders , employees’ representatives or spokespersons , and stakeholders external to them but who are affected by their activities and supply chains; ### 14. considers that , in the process of defining and monitoring their sustainability strategy , companies should engage with all relevant internal and external stakeholders; ; considers it necessary that workers are involved in the definition of the sustainability strategy and approve it , in particular through their unions , representatives and spokespersons; considers that all stakeholders who are affected by actual and foreseeable severe impacts caused , contributed to by the company or directly linked to its activities , products or services by business relationships , should be consulted; further considers it essential to consult national and local public authorities dealing with the sustainability of economic affairs , in particular those in charge of employment and environmental public policies; and encourages the consultation of associations protecting consumers and the environment , including the climate and biodiversity;


### 14. considers that , in the process of defining and monitoring their sustainability strategy , companies should engage with all relevant stakeholders , including shareholders , employees’ representatives or spokespersons , and stakeholders external to them but who are affected by their activities and supply chains; ### 14. considers that , in the process of defining and monitoring their sustainability strategy , companies should ensure that their governance comprises at least one third of salaried directors in order to benefit from their knowledge of the company; considers , too , that companies should engage with all relevant stakeholders , including shareholders , employees’ representatives or spokespersons , and stakeholders external to them but who are affected by their activities and supply chains;


### 15. considers that this engagement should take place , depending on the size and field of activity of the company concerned , by means of advisory committees , in which stakeholders’ representatives or spokespersons would participate , and that will be tasked with advising on the content and the implementation of the sustainability strategy; believes that such committees should have the right to request and carry out , if approved by a large majority , an internal inquiry if reasonable concerns on the correct implementation of the sustainability strategy are raised. ### 15. considers that this engagement should take place , depending on the size and field of activity of the company concerned , by means of advisory committees , in which workers’ representatives and trade unions , as well as other stakeholders’ representatives or spokespersons would participate , and that will be tasked with advising on the content and the implementation of the sustainability strategy; considers that civil society organizations , particularly associations dedicated to the protection of consumers and of the environment should participate in the work of the advisory committees; believes that such committees should have the right to request and carry out , if approved by a large majority , an internal inquiry if reasonable concerns on the correct implementation of the sustainability strategy are raised.


### 1. believes that as asia is home to the world’s largest population and fastest-growing economies , increasing connectivity between the eu and asia , with an open , rules-based multilateral trading system that ensures a level playing field , will play a key role in mutual economic growth and will be an important factor in the recovery from the ongoing covid-19 pandemic; ### 1. notes that the not much has materialised since the commission and the external action service adopted their joint communication on "connecting europe and asia – building blocks for an eu strategy"; believes that as asia is home to the world’s largest population and fastest-growing economies , increasing connectivity between the eu and asia should be placed much higher on the list of priorities; considers an open , fair , and rules-based multilateral trading system as the essential supportive framework for improving eu - asia trade relations; emphasises the advantages of a level playing field among equal economic players; stresses that eu - asia economic relations will play a key role in mutual economic growth and will be an important factor in the recovery from the ongoing covid-19 pandemic;


### 1. calls on the commission and the european external action service (eeas) to ensure proper implementation of the eu-asia connectivity strategy by providing an effective political governance mechanism that could make the eu a rule setter in transport connectivity , while promoting eu principles such as transparency , good governance and sustainability; ### 1. calls on the commission and the european external action service (eeas) to ensure proper implementation of the eu-asia connectivity strategy by providing an effective political governance mechanism that could make the eu a rule setter and partner in transport connectivity , while promoting eu principles such as transparency , good governance , sustainability , democracy and the respect of human rights;


### 2. regrets that many countries in asia still apply protectionist economic policies creating an unfair playing field for european businesses; notes that allowing free trade flows will build economic resilience and ensure the global availability of products through the diversification of supply chains; ### 2. observes that many countries in asia still see a need for protecting certain economic sectors; is aware that many asian actors will need more time to become advanced enough players to match on a level playing field with european businesses; notes that fair trade flows are based on a fair price paid for environmentally sound production in decent working conditions , and will build economic resilience and can ensure increased availability of products through the diversification of supply chains;


### 2. expects the strategy to contribute to implementing the eu’s main framework policies of building a strong and fair union , investing in peaceful international relations , achieving economic progress on the basis of the european green deal and the digital transformation , and promoting global justice; ### 2. expects the strategy to contribute to implementing the eu’s main framework policies of building a strong and fair union , investing in peaceful international relations , achieving an sustainable economic and social progress on the basis of the european green deal and the digital transformation , and promoting global justice; furthermore , expects the strategy to contribute to the attainment of the sustainable development goals (sdgs) , mainly: goal 6 (clean water and sanitation) , goal 7 (ensure access to affordable , reliable , sustainable and modern energy for all) , goal 9 (build resilient infrastructure , promote sustainable industrialisation and foster innovation) , goal 8 (promote inclusive and sustainable economic growth , employment and decent work for all) , and goal 14 (conserve and sustainably use the oceans , seas and marine resources);


### 3. believes that efficient connections and networks between europe and asia through priority transport corridors , including air , sea and land transport , and high-capacity network links will increase trade flows between the eu and asia; acknowledges the existence of an investment gap in connectivity and recognises the need to mobilise and strengthen cooperation with private investors , national and international institutions , and multilateral development banks; ### 3. believes that efficient and environmentally sustainable connections and networks between europe and asia through priority transport corridors , including air , sea and land transport , and high-capacity network links will increase trade flows between the eu and asia; acknowledges the existence of an investment gap in connectivity and recognises the need to mobilise and strengthen cooperation with national and international institutions , and multilateral development banks. believes that developing public transportation can reduce greenhouse gas emissions