### 12. notes the commission’s proposal for the creation of the ‘accessibleeu’ resource centre by 2022; calls on the commission to create an eu agency on accessibility (‘eu access board’) that would be in charge of developing technical specifications on accessibility in support of specific eu policies and legislation , carrying out consultations with rights-holders and stakeholders , helping member states and eu institutions to implement accessibility in a harmonised way for the benefit of the single market , and raising awareness of the importance of accessibility for inclusive societies; ### 12. notes the commission’s proposal for the creation of the ‘accessibleeu’ resource centre by 2022; calls on the commission task force on equality to adopt framework provisions for developing technical specifications on accessibility in support of specific eu policies and legislation , carrying out consultations with rights-holders and stakeholders , helping member states and eu institutions to implement accessibility in a harmonised way for the benefit of the single market , and raising awareness of the importance of accessibility for inclusive societies;


### 13. regrets the fact that access to the built environment and physical accessibility were not included within the scope of the european accessibility act; calls on the commission to use the european accessibility act as a basis for adopting a robust eu framework for an accessible and inclusive environment with fully accessible public spaces , services , including public transport , communication and financial services , and the built environment; ### 13. regrets the fact that access to the physical environment and physical accessibility were not included within the scope of the european accessibility act; calls on the commission to use the european accessibility act as a basis for adopting a robust eu framework for an accessible and inclusive environment with fully accessible public spaces , services , including public transport , communication , administrative and financial services , and the physical environment;


### 14. calls on the member states to ensure the swift implementation at all levels of directive 2016/2102 on the accessibility of public sector bodies’ websites and mobile applications , in order to guarantee that persons with disabilities are able to access all information they require in an accessible format; welcomes the commission’s initiative for an action plan on web accessibility for all eu institutions , bodies and agencies with a view to ensuring the compliance of eu websites , and the documents published on these websites and online platforms , with european accessibility standards; urges all eu institutions , bodies and agencies to comply with the european accessibility standards as quickly as possible; ### 14. calls on the member states to ensure the swift implementation at all levels of directive 2016/2102 on the accessibility of public sector bodies’ websites and mobile applications , in order to guarantee that persons with disabilities are able to access all information they require in an accessible format; welcomes the commission’s initiative for an action plan on web accessibility for all eu institutions , bodies and agencies with a view to ensuring the compliance of eu websites , and the documents published on these websites and online platforms , with european accessibility standards at least; urges all eu institutions , bodies and agencies to comply with the european accessibility standards as quickly as possible;


### 16. notes that there is no mutual recognition of disability status between member states; calls on the member states to work together in a spirit of mutual trust to recognise the status assigned in another member state; emphasises the commission’s goal of working with member states to expand the scope of the mutual recognition of disability status in areas such as labour mobility and the benefits related to the conditions of service provision; ### 16. notes that there is no mutual recognition of disability status between member states; calls on the member states to work together in a spirit of mutual trust to recognise the status assigned in another member state; emphasises the commission’s goal of working with member states to expand the scope of the mutual recognition of disability status in areas such as labour mobility and the benefits related to the conditions of service provision; underlines in this context the importance of swift action in terms of implementation of the european disability card;


### 17. stresses the urgent need for eu legislation aimed at protecting citizens against all forms of discrimination in the eu; urges the member states to adopt the eu horizontal anti-discrimination directive tabled by the commission in 2008; calls on the commission to present an alternative solution in order to move forward in tackling discrimination across the eu , in all areas of life , as soon as possible; ### 17. stresses the urgent need for eu legislation aimed at protecting citizens against all forms of discrimination in the eu;


### 22. calls on the commission to conduct further research into the impact and health-related effects of led lights , in particular on photosensitive persons and persons with disabilities; ### 22. calls on the commission to conduct further research into the impact and health-related effects of led lights on persons with associated disorders;


### 23. welcomes the fact that member states are willing to implement inclusive educational policies , but calls on them to further increase their education systems’ capacity to provide high-quality inclusive education for all learners , and calls on the commission to strengthen the role of the child guarantee in ensuring the inclusion of children with disabilities; ### 23. welcomes the fact that member states are willing to implement inclusive educational policies , but calls on them to further increase their education systems’ capacity to provide high-quality inclusive education for all learners , and calls on the commission to strengthen the role of the child guarantee in ensuring the inclusion of children with disabilities; stresses that persons with disabilities should be guaranteed access to education , including during crises such as the covid-19 pandemic , and member states should tackle all forms of discrimination and exclusion in this area;


### 23. welcomes the fact that member states are willing to implement inclusive educational policies , but calls on them to further increase their education systems’ capacity to provide high-quality inclusive education for all learners , and calls on the commission to strengthen the role of the child guarantee in ensuring the inclusion of children with disabilities; ### 23. welcomes the fact that member states are willing to implement inclusive educational policies , but calls on them to further increase their education systems’ capacity to provide high-quality inclusive education for all learners , and calls on the commission to strengthen the role of the child guarantee , giving consideration to an accessible school award scheme , in ensuring the inclusion of children with disabilities;


### c. whereas it is generally acknowledged that persons with disabilities continue to face multiple obstacles and discrimination in everyday life and that they do not enjoy the fundamental freedoms and rights laid down in numerous eu and un documents , such as mutual recognition of disability status between member states , access to public transport , accessibility of the built environment , use of sign languages , financing of and equal access to education and vocational training , access to personal assistance and community inclusion; ### c. whereas it is generally acknowledged that persons with disabilities continue to face multiple obstacles and difficulties in everyday life and that , in practice , they do not enjoy the fundamental freedoms and rights proclaimed in numerous eu and un documents ratified by the member states , such as mutual recognition of disability status between member states , access to public transport , accessibility of the built environment , use of sign languages , financing of and equal access to education and vocational training , access to personal assistance and community inclusion;


### c. whereas it is generally acknowledged that persons with disabilities continue to face multiple obstacles and discrimination in everyday life and that they do not enjoy the fundamental freedoms and rights laid down in numerous eu and un documents , such as mutual recognition of disability status between member states , access to public transport , accessibility of the built environment , use of sign languages , financing of and equal access to education and vocational training , access to personal assistance and community inclusion; ### c. whereas it is generally acknowledged that persons with disabilities continue to face multiple obstacles and discrimination in everyday life and that they do not enjoy the fundamental freedoms and rights laid down in numerous eu and un documents , such as mutual recognition of disability status between member states , access to public transport , accessibility of the physical1c environment , use of sign languages , financing of and equal access to education and vocational training , access to personal assistance and community inclusion;


### 2. highlights that erasmus+ should support stakeholders’ and programme participants’ internationalisation plans that remove the physical , psychological , social , socio-economic , linguistic and other types of barriers to learning mobility and that offer clear and detailed information and qualitative support for participants from under-represented groups and those with specific needs; ### 2. highlights that erasmus+ should contribute to the removal of the physical , socio-economic , linguistic and other types of barriers to learning mobility and that offer clear and detailed information and qualitative support for participants from under-represented groups and those with specific needs in all 24 languages , considering that language barriers are a contributor to the lower number of erasmus+ participants. in particular among those with fewer opportunities;


### 5. acknowledges the role of teachers , youth workers and staff as the driving forces behind participating institutions in raising awareness of the programme , in informing and supporting future learners , and identifying people with fewer opportunities , and notes that without them , most participants with fewer opportunities would not be able to take part; calls on the commission , the member states and national agencies to value and acknowledge their often voluntary work , to support them by facilitating their own mobility and to provide them with adequate funding , while accompanying participants with fewer opportunities and offering them specific training adapted to their needs; ### 5. acknowledges the role of teachers , youth workers and staff in raising awareness of the programme , in informing and supporting future learners , and notes that without them , most participants with fewer opportunities would not be able to take part; calls on the commission , the member states and national agencies to value and acknowledge their often voluntary work , to support them by facilitating their own mobility and to provide them with adequate funding , while accompanying participants with fewer opportunities and offering them specific training adapted to their needs;


### 6. stresses the need for the commission , the member states and national agencies to provide better support for grassroots organisations in all areas , particularly in the outermost regions and rural areas , and to ensure that resources and projects are distributed fairly in each member state; ### 6. stresses the need for the commission , the member states and national agencies to provide better support for grassroots organisations in all areas , particularly in the outermost regions and rural , mountainous , remote and less accessible areas , or less developed regions or territories , and to ensure that resources and projects are distributed fairly in each member state;


### 7. stresses the importance of providing better financial and material support to staff , so that they can engage with participants and their families , in order to give them more confidence , while ensuring that mobility projects run smoothly; ### 7. stresses the importance of providing adequate financial and material support to staff , so that they can engage with participants and their families , in order to ensure that mobility projects run smoothly;


### 9. asks all national agencies to organise targeted information campaigns , both online and offline , and to appoint dedicated inclusion and diversity officers in order to reach out to learners with special needs and/or fewer opportunities; ### 9. asks all national agencies to organise targeted information campaigns , both online and offline , in order to reach out to learners with special needs and/or fewer opportunities;


### 10. supports all eu initiatives aimed at facilitating student mobility , such as the erasmus+ mobile application , ‘paperless erasmus’ and the european student card; calls on the commission to look closely at the possibility of more closely linking erasmus+ and interrail , in order to foster greater equality and provide participants with better access to greener means of transport; ### 10. supports all eu initiatives aimed at facilitating student mobility , such as the erasmus+ mobile application , ‘paperless erasmus’ and the european student card; calls on the commission to carefully examine the possibility of more closely linking erasmus+ and interrail , in order to improve access to better mobility options , particularly for those with fewer opportunities;


### d. whereas physical mobility enables immersion in , and optimum interaction with , other cultures , and whereas virtual exchanges and learning are a valuable complement to physical mobility , but do not provide the same experience; ### d. whereas physical mobility enables immersion in , and optimum interaction with , other cultures , and whereas virtual exchanges and learning can be a valuable complement to physical mobility , but do not provide the same quality of experience and benefits;


### e. whereas the experience of mobility offered by erasmus+ can be a transformative experience for participants , and can positively influence their self-confidence , openness , critical thinking , employability and well-being; ### e. whereas the experience of mobility offered by erasmus+ can be a transformative one for participants , and can positively influence their knowledge of other european cultures , their communication skills , critical thinking , employability and well-being;


### f. whereas the mid-term evaluation of the erasmus+ programme 2014-2020 published by the commission in 2018 underlined the necessity of reaching more people with fewer opportunities and smaller organisations; ### f. whereas the mid-term evaluation of the erasmus+ programme 2014-2020 published by the commission in 2018 underlined the necessity of reaching more people with fewer opportunities and smaller organisations in all regions;


### 11. recognises the important role of support , advanced learning and training opportunities (salto) inclusion & diversity for the implementation of inclusion measures for the erasmus+ youth strand , and notes that the extension of inclusion strategies to the education & training strand in the current programming period will have to be followed closely , as the target groups are different; stresses the need for national agencies to work more closely with employment agencies to facilitate the integration of adult learners into the erasmus+ 2021-2027 programme; ### 11. recognises the important role of support , advanced learning and training opportunities (salto) for the implementation of inclusion measures for the erasmus+ youth strand , and notes that the extension of inclusion strategies to the education & training strand in the current programming period will have to be followed closely , as the target groups are different; stresses the need for national agencies to work more closely with employment agencies to facilitate the integration of adult learners into the erasmus+ 2021-2027 programme;


### 12. regrets the lack of reliable data on the participation of people with fewer opportunities in the erasmus+ programme; underlines the need to gather and monitor a critical mass of reliable data in order to create a management and steering tool for inclusion measures , using methods which respect privacy and do not add undue administrative burdens for organisations and participants; ### 12. regrets the lack of reliable data on the participation of people with fewer opportunities in the erasmus+ programme; underlines the need to gather and monitor a critical mass of reliable data in order to create , where appropriate and strictly following the data , a management and steering tool for inclusion measures; stresses that using any methods for data collection must in all cases respect the privacy of participants , and must contribute to the reduction of administrative burdens for organisations and participants , which is one of the primary barriers for inclusion of people with fewer opportunities and those with special needs;


### 15. asks the member states to adopt targeted policies for learners with fewer opportunities and special needs in order to increase participation in erasmus+ and to foster exchanges of good practices in this field; ### 15. recommends to the member states to evaluate their existing policies , programmes and actions targeting learners with fewer opportunities and special needs , and where necessary adapt and reinforce these measures based on concrete quantitative and qualitative data , taking into full account their national , regional and local specificities , in order to increase participation in erasmus+ and to foster exchanges of good practices in this field;


### 17. calls on the commission and the member states to use the european year of youth and related events to promote the opportunities offered by the erasmus+ programme; ### 17. calls on the commission and the member states to use the european year of youth and related events to promote the opportunities offered by the erasmus+ programme; regrets the low indicated budget for the european year of youth is insufficient to meet the needs of the initiative;


### 18. welcomes the commission’s recent adoption of the 2021-2027 framework of measures aimed at increasing diversity and inclusion in the current erasmus+ and european solidarity corps programmes , but nevertheless calls on the commission to closely monitor the future national implementation of this framework; ### 18. welcomes the commission’s recent adoption of the 2021-2027 framework of measures aimed at increasing diversity and inclusion in the current erasmus+ and european solidarity corps programmes and calls on the commission to closely monitor the future national implementation of this framework;


### 1. underlines the high number of petitions received from citizens concerned about the breaches of the rule of law in their respective countries and with the consequences of such breaches on their lives; stresses that full protection of union citizens’ rights can be ensured throughout the union only if all member states comply with all the principles underlying the rule of law , as deficiencies in one member state have an impact on other member states and the union as a whole; ### 1. underlines the high number of petitions received from citizens concerned about the breaches of the rule of law in their respective countries and with the consequences of such breaches on their lives; stresses that full protection of union citizens’ rights can be ensured throughout the union only if all member states comply with the principles underlying the rule of law , defined after a thorough analyses involving all member states and their specificities;


### 1. welcomes the commission’s first ever rule of law report as a positive addition to the eu’s toolbox to prevent and address rule of law issues in member states; ### 1. notes the commission’s first ever rule of law report;


### 1. welcomes the commission’s first ever rule of law report as a positive addition to the eu’s toolbox to prevent and address rule of law issues in member states; ### 1. notes that the commission’s first ever rule of law report constitutes an addition to the eu’s toolbox and urges the commission that such an instrument has to be used in good faith , should be written objectively by reflecting only facts , and should guarantee the equal treatment of all member states;


### 2. recalls that the commission’s report is a response to the council’s failure to trigger the procedure under article 7(1) of the treaty on european union (teu) , as requested by the commission in 2017 and parliament in 2018; regrets that the council has failed to resume hearings under article 7 of the teu since december 2019; notes that the failure to apply article 7 of the teu , also due to the requirement of unanimity for the sanctions mechanism , enables continued divergence from the values enshrined in article 2 of the teu; ### 2. recalls that the commission’s report is a response to the council’s decision not to trigger the procedure under article 7(1) of the treaty on european union (teu) , as requested by the commission in 2017 and parliament in 2018;


### 2. recalls that the commission’s report is a response to the council’s failure to trigger the procedure under article 7(1) of the treaty on european union (teu) , as requested by the commission in 2017 and parliament in 2018; regrets that the council has failed to resume hearings under article 7 of the teu since december 2019; notes that the failure to apply article 7 of the teu , also due to the requirement of unanimity for the sanctions mechanism , enables continued divergence from the values enshrined in article 2 of the teu; ### 2. recalls that the commission’s report is a response to the council’s failure to trigger the procedure under article 7(1) of the treaty on european union (teu) , as requested by the commission in 2017 and parliament in 2018; notes that the council has not resumed hearings under article 7 of the teu since december 2019;


### 2. welcomes the commission’s 2020 rule of law report (the report) and the importance that it places on the justice system; ### 2. notes the commission’s 2020 rule of law report (the report) and the importance that it places on the justice system;


### 2. welcomes the commission’s 2020 rule of law report (the report) and the importance that it places on the justice system; ### 2. takes note of the commission’s 2020 rule of law report (the report) and the importance that it places on the justice system;


### — having regard to regulation (eu , euratom) 2020/2092 of the european parliament and of the council of 16 december 2020 on a general regime of conditionality for the protection of the union budget1 , ### deleted


### — having regard to the european convention for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms , the european social charter , the case law of the european court of human rights and the european committee of social rights , and the conventions , recommendations , resolutions , opinions and reports of the parliamentary assembly , the committee of ministers , the human rights commissioner , the european commission against racism and intolerance , the steering committee on anti-discrimination , diversity and inclusion , the venice commission and other bodies of the council of europe , ### — having regard to the european convention for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms , the european social charter , the case law of the european court of human rights and the european committee of social rights , the council of europe framework convention for the protection of national minorities (fcnm) and the european charter for regional or minority languages (ecrml) and the conventions , recommendations , resolutions , opinions and reports of the parliamentary assembly , the committee of ministers , the human rights commissioner , the european commission against racism and intolerance , the steering committee on anti-discrimination , diversity and inclusion , the venice commission , the advisory committee on the fcnm , the committee of experts of the ecrml and other bodies of the council of europe ,


### — having regard to the commission’s reasoned proposal for a council decision of 20 december 2017 on the determination of a clear risk of a serious breach by the republic of poland of the rule of law , issued in accordance with article 7(1) of the treaty on european union (com(2017)0835) , ### deleted


### — having regard to its resolution of 25 october 2016 with recommendations to the commission on the establishment of an eu mechanism on democracy , the rule of law and fundamental rights2 , ### deleted


### — having regard to its resolution of 12 september 2018 on a proposal calling on the council to determine , pursuant to article 7(1) of the treaty on european union , the existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by hungary of the values on which the union is founded5 , ### deleted


### — having regard to its resolution of 14 november 2018 on the need for a comprehensive eu mechanism for the protection of democracy , the rule of law and fundamental rights6 , ### deleted


### — having regard to its resolution of 13 february 2019 on experiencing a backlash in women’s rights and gender equality in the eu7 , ### deleted


### — having regard to its resolution of 18 december 2019 on public discrimination and hate speech against lgbti people , including lgbti free zones8 , ### deleted


### — having regard to its resolution of 16 january 2020 on ongoing hearings under article 7(1) of the teu regarding poland and hungary10 , ### deleted


### — having regard to its resolution of 17 september 2020 on the proposal for a council decision on the determination of a clear risk of a serious breach by the republic of poland of the rule of law12 , ### deleted


### — having regard to its resolution of 7 october 2020 on the establishment of an eu mechanism on democracy , the rule of law and fundamental rights13 , ### deleted


### — having regard to its resolution of 17 december 2020 on the multiannual financial framework 2021-2027 , the interinstitutional agreement , the eu recovery instrument and the rule of law regulation16 , ### deleted


### — having regard to its resolution of 11 march 2021 on the declaration of the eu as an lgbtiq freedom zone17 , ### deleted


### — having regard to its resolution of 25 march 2021 on the application of regulation (eu , euratom) 2020/2092 , the rule-of-law conditionality mechanism18 , ### deleted


### a. whereas the union is founded on the values set out in article 2 of the treaty on european union (teu); whereas democracy , the rule of law and fundamental rights are mutually reinforcing values which , when undermined , may pose a systemic threat to the union; ### a. whereas the union is founded on the values set out in article 2 of the treaty on european union (teu); whereas democracy , the rule of law and fundamental rights are mutually reinforcing values which , when undermined , may pose a systemic threat to the union; whereas article 2 teu applies not only and not even primarily to the member states , but to the european union and the rule of law should cover the eu institutions , all the more so that they have long been accused of democratic deficit;


### b. whereas the annual rule of law review cycle is a welcome addition to the tools available to preserve the union’s values , by addressing the situation in all eu member states based on four pillars , with a direct bearing on respect for the rule of law; whereas it is intended as a yearly cycle to ensure the rule of law and to prevent problems from emerging or deepening; ### b. whereas the annual rule of law review cycle is an addition to the tools available to the union; whereas it is intended as a yearly cycle to ensure the rule of law and to prevent problems from emerging or deepening;


### c. whereas the commission’s first rule of law report (2020 report) is limited in scope , as it does not cover all union values as provided for in article 2 of the teu; ### c. whereas the commission’s first rule of law report (2020 report) is extended in scope , as it covers more than just rule of law as one of all union values as provided for in article 2 of the teu; whereas the notion of the rule of law has different and distinct manifestations in the member states and there is no definition of it at the eu level;


### d. whereas while the 2020 report raises concerns and awareness , it does not provide a sufficient assessment of the effectiveness of the reforms carried out by each country , nor any concrete country-specific recommendations , which could jeopardise its intended preventive effects; ### deleted


### d. whereas while the 2020 report raises concerns and awareness , it does not provide a sufficient assessment of the effectiveness of the reforms carried out by each country , nor any concrete country-specific recommendations , which could jeopardise its intended preventive effects; ### d. whereas while the 2020 report raises concerns and awareness , it does not provide a sufficient assessment of the effectiveness of the reforms carried out by each country , nor any concrete country-specific recommendations , because the commission has no competences in this regard and the only recommendations regarding the rule of law may be addressed in accordance with procedure set up article 7(1) teu;


### e. whereas without effective follow-up under an annual monitoring cycle , the 2020 report may fail to address systemic challenges and backsliding on the rule of law as witnessed in several eu member states in recent years; ### deleted


### f. whereas backsliding on the rule of law and fundamental rights in some countries is seriously affecting mutual trust in the functioning of the area of freedom , security and justice and threatening the union objectives as enshrined in article 3 of the teu; ### deleted


### 3. stresses , in line with the report , that effective justice systems which are independent and efficient are essential for upholding the rule of law; highlights , in particular , the need for the judiciary to be able to exercise its functions with full autonomy , without intervention from any other institution or body , in accordance with the principle of separation of powers; ### 3. stresses , in line with the report , that effective justice systems which are independent and efficient are essential for upholding the rule of law; highlights , in particular , the need for the judiciary to be able to exercise its functions with full autonomy , without intervention from any other institution or body , in accordance with the principle of separation of powers; emphasises that national justice systems are an area in which the member states have exclusive competence and the european union does not have competence;


### 4. is deeply preoccupied by the fact that judicial independence continues to be a subject of serious concern in some member states; expresses its regret that hungary and poland lodged an action for annulment of regulation (eu , euratom) 2020/2092 on a general regime of conditionality for the protection of the union budget in march 2021 , which aims to address breaches of the rule of law with an impact on the union’s financial interests; ### 4. is deeply preoccupied by the fact that judicial independence continues to be a subject of serious concern in some member states; expresses its regret at the disparity in the criteria used in assessing justice systems in the various member states , with assessment criteria twisted to criticise some countries but not others for similar situations; regrets in this regard the constant persecution of those countries , such as hungary and poland , that do not conform to the ideology ruling in the institutions;


### 4. is deeply preoccupied by the fact that judicial independence continues to be a subject of serious concern in some member states; expresses its regret that hungary and poland lodged an action for annulment of regulation (eu , euratom) 2020/2092 on a general regime of conditionality for the protection of the union budget in march 2021 , which aims to address breaches of the rule of law with an impact on the union’s financial interests; ### 4. stresses that judicial independence is a cornerstone of the rule of law and member states should focus all necessary efforts on ensuring that these principles are upheld; reiterates that without undermining the competence and status of member states , continued mutual trust and efficient legislation is best fostered at national level through good and close cooperation , as well as the exchange of best practices;


### 5. considers that the periodic review of the rule of law is of great significance and commends the efforts of the commission to encourage structural reforms in the areas covered by the report; believes , however , that while it is an essential monitoring tool , clear recommendations on the challenges identified and the required follow-up action is indispensable; urges the commission to make robust use of infringement procedures where appropriate , to prevent backsliding on the rule of law in national justice systems and urges the council to resume all pending procedures under article 7(1) of the tfeu and to inform the parliament thereof; ### 5. considers that the periodic review of the rule of law is of great significance and commends the efforts of the commission to encourage structural reforms in the areas in which the union has competence , while refraining from making a pronouncement on those competences that have not been bestowed upon it by the treaties; believes , however , that while it is an essential monitoring tool , it is interesting that recommendations are made that are designed to direct and assist member states in improving their compliance with the rule of law; reminds the commission that it shall not interfere during infringement procedures in areas where it does not have competence , so as to respect the rule of law both in national justice systems and in the union;


### 5. considers that the periodic review of the rule of law is of great significance and commends the efforts of the commission to encourage structural reforms in the areas covered by the report; believes , however , that while it is an essential monitoring tool , clear recommendations on the challenges identified and the required follow-up action is indispensable; urges the commission to make robust use of infringement procedures where appropriate , to prevent backsliding on the rule of law in national justice systems and urges the council to resume all pending procedures under article 7(1) of the tfeu and to inform the parliament thereof; ### 5. considers that the periodic review of the rule of law may result useful and the following recommendations of the commission could encourage structural reforms in the areas covered by the report; believes , however , that while it is an essential monitoring tool , clear criteria should be developed in order to avoid recommendations on the challenges identified and the required follow-up action to be used for political purposes; urges the commission to make the necessary use of infringement procedures only where appropriate and where there is clear evidence of violations , to prevent backsliding on the rule of law in national justice systems


### 6. notes with satisfaction that the report contains separate national chapters attempting to lay down a common methodology; calls on the commission , however , to provide a meaningful comparison between the different national justice systems , to underline where best practices for comparable systems might be applied and how similar deficiencies could be addressed; ### 6. notes that the report contains separate national chapters attempting to lay down a common methodology; calls on the commission , however , to provide a meaningful comparison between the different national justice systems , to underline where best practices for comparable systems might be applied and how similar deficiencies could be addressed; recalls however the different regional and geopolitical contexts affecting member states and that a “one size fits all” approach should be avoided;


### 6. notes with satisfaction that the report contains separate national chapters attempting to lay down a common methodology; calls on the commission , however , to provide a meaningful comparison between the different national justice systems , to underline where best practices for comparable systems might be applied and how similar deficiencies could be addressed; ### 6. notices that the report contains separate national chapters and that the methodology needs to be improved to make it common to all member states; calls on the commission , however , to provide a simple and clear comparison between the different national justice systems , to underline where best practices for comparable systems might be applied and how similar deficiencies could be addressed without a preconceived ideological slant;


### 5. recommends the establishment of minimum standards for the hearing of a child in national civil proceedings in accordance with article 24 of the charter of fundamental rights; ### 5. considers the possibility of establishing minimum standards for the hearing of a child in national civil proceedings in accordance with article 24 of the charter of fundamental rights;


### 6. recalls that the authorities of the member states must ensure that a child is given the genuine and effective opportunity to express their own views freely during proceedings and that due weight is given to the child’s views in accordance with their age and maturity; ### 6. recalls that the authorities of the member states must ensure that a child is given the genuine and effective opportunity to express their own views freely during proceedings and that due weight is given to the child’s views in accordance with their age and maturity while at the same time taking appropriate measures to respect the child’s emotional and physical integrity;


### 7. welcomes the commission’s publication of the eu policy framework to ensure the protection of the rights of the child1 , in particular the fourth pillar entitled ‘child-friendly justice: an eu where the justice system upholds the rights and needs of children’; ### 7. notes the commission’s publication of the eu policy framework to ensure the protection of the rights of the child1 , in particular the fourth pillar entitled ‘child-friendly justice: an eu where the justice system upholds the rights and needs of children in accordance with the applicable national legislation;


### 8. stresses the need for justice professionals to be given specific training on the rights of the child and child-friendly justice in line with the european judicial training strategy for 2021-2024 and under the european judicial training network (ejtn) , the justice programme , the citizens , equality , rights and values programme , and the european training platform of the european e-justice portal; ### 8. stresses the need for justice professionals to be given specific training on the rights of the child and child-friendly justice in line with the european judicial training strategy for 2021-2024 and under the european judicial training network (ejtn) and the european training platform of the european e-justice portal;


### 9. points out the that greater mobility within the eu has led to an increasing number of cross-border child protection issues involving custody removal and notes that cross-border proceedings are more complex from a legal perspective and usually more time-consuming and expensive; considers that in the light of article 81 of the treaty on the functioning of the european union the commission must play an active role in ensuring fair and consistent non-discriminatory practices in the treatment of cross-border child custody cases throughout the union; ### 9. points out the that greater mobility within the eu has led to an increasing number of cross-border child protection issues involving custody removal and notes that cross-border proceedings are more complex from a legal perspective and usually more time-consuming and expensive; considers that in the light of article 81 of the treaty on the functioning of the european union the commission could play a role in ensuring fair and consistent non-discriminatory practices in the treatment of cross-border child custody cases throughout the union in compliance with the applicable national laws;


### 10. underlines that the exercise of a fundamental right such as freedom of movement and freedom of residence should not pose a greater threat to the child’s rights , that children involved in cross-border civil and family law disputes should enjoy the same rights and level of protection in all member states , and that children whose parents exercise their right to freedom of movement have the right to maintain a personal relationship and direct contact with their parents on a regular basis , unless it is contrary to the best interests of the child; ### 10. underlines that the exercise of a fundamental right such as freedom of movement and freedom of residence should not pose a threat to the child’s rights , that children involved in cross-border civil and family law disputes should enjoy the same rights and level of protection in all member states , and that children whose parents exercise their right to freedom of movement have the right to maintain a personal relationship and direct contact with their parents on a regular basis , unless it is contrary to the best interests of the child or there is no legal basis in the national legislation to grant such rights;


### 11. stresses that the lack of effective procedures for the enforcement of judgments in cross-border cases is detrimental to the best interests of the child; recalls the need to improve mutual judicial and administrative cooperation between member state authorities in order to ensure mutual trust in matters concerning the recognition and enforcement of decisions and judgments adopted in family disputes with cross-border aspects involving children; ### 11. stresses that the lack of effective procedures for the enforcement of judgments in cross-border cases is detrimental to the best interests of the child; recalls the need to improve mutual judicial and administrative cooperation between member state authorities , without prejudice to the applicable national legislation , in order to ensure mutual trust in matters concerning the recognition and enforcement of decisions and judgments adopted in family disputes with cross-border aspects involving children;


### 13. notes that in some member states same-sex couples with children are frequently denied recognition of their legal parental status when crossing borders , which hinders the best interests of the child in legal proceedings; calls on the commission and the member states to rectify this discriminatory situation and to remove the obstacles faced by same-sex couples when exercising their procedural rights in family disputes with cross-border aspects involving children; ### 13. notes that in some member states same-sex couples with children are frequently denied recognition of their legal parental status when crossing borders; underlines that these member states base these decisions on their constitutions and in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in article 5 teu; recalls that family law is a matter within the competences of the member states and therefore same-sex couples when exercising their procedural rights in family disputes with cross-border aspects involving children should respect the national legal provision without labelling them as discriminatory or contrary to the rights and the interests of the child;


### — having regard to the results of the commission’s public consultation on eu citizenship rights 2020 , and to the results of the flash eurobarometer 485 survey on european union citizenship and democracy published in july 2020 , ### — having regard to the results of the commission’s public consultation on eu citizenship rights 2020 , and to the results of the flash eurobarometer 485 survey on european union citizenship and democracy published in july 2020 , which show that during the covid-19 pandemic many eu citizens have encountered difficulties in accessing health care support , child care support , information about the border situation , etc ,


### 1. believes that a single independent eu ethics body is necessary to ensure the consistent and full implementation of ethics standards across the eu institutions; proposes the conclusion of an interinstitutional agreement (iia) to set up an eu ethics body for parliament and the commission open to the participation of all eu institutions , agencies and bodies; recommends that the iia contain the following provisions: ### 1. proposes the conclusion of an interinstitutional agreement (iia) to set up an eu ethics body for parliament and the commission open to the participation of all eu institutions , agencies and bodies; recommends that the iia contain the following provisions:


### 1. believes that a single independent eu ethics body is necessary to ensure the consistent and full implementation of ethics standards across the eu institutions; proposes the conclusion of an interinstitutional agreement (iia) to set up an eu ethics body for parliament and the commission open to the participation of all eu institutions , agencies and bodies; recommends that the iia contain the following provisions: ### 1. believes that the committee on legal affairs of the european parliament should fully maintain its exclusive competence to decide on possible conflicts of interest; calls on the commission and the council to examine , without budgetary implications , whether a single independent eu ethics body is necessary and of added value for the purpose of ensuring the consistent and full implementation of ethics standards across the eu institutions;


### 1. notes that within the eu institutions different legislative measures aimed at preventing conflicts of interest contain varying definitions of the term ‘conflict of interest’; believes therefore that the term should be understood to mean a conflict between the public duty and private interests of a public official , in which the public official has private-capacity interests which could improperly influence the performance of their official duties and responsibilities; notes , however , that a definition of this kind has an evolving nature and that full transparency does not necessarily guarantee the absence of any conflict of interest , nor does it guarantee public trust; ### 1. notes that within the eu institutions different legislative measures aimed at preventing conflicts of interest contain varying definitions of the term ‘conflict of interest’; believes therefore that the term should be understood to mean a conflict between the public duty and private interests of a public official or post , in which the public official has private-capacity interests which could improperly influence the performance of their official duties and responsibilities; notes , however , that a definition of this kind has an evolving nature and that full transparency does not necessarily guarantee the absence of any conflict of interest , nor does it guarantee public trust;


### c. whereas the shortcomings of the current eu ethics framework derive largely from the fact that it relies on a self-regulatory approach and lacks adequate human and financial resources and competences to verify information; ### deleted


### 2. considers that the new eu ethics body should be delegated a list of competences to implement ethics rules for members and staff; takes the view that this list should include by way of a minimum the competences provided for in: ### 2. considers that the new advisory eu ethics body should be delegated a list of competences to implement ethics rules for members and staff; takes the view that this list should include by way of a minimum the competences provided for in:


### 4. believes therefore that the committee on legal affairs should be given sufficient time to evaluate possible conflicts of interest; further believes that it should be provided with sufficient resources , tools and skills to cross-check and locate necessary information; ### 4. believes therefore that the committee on legal affairs should be given sufficient time to evaluate possible conflicts of interest; further believes that it should be provided with sufficient tools and skills to cross-check and locate necessary information;


### 5. considers that the participating institutions should entrust the eu ethics body with monitoring powers over ethics standards , as well as advisory , investigative and enforcement powers; ### 5. considers that the participating institutions should entrust the eu ethics body with advisory powers;


### 5. considers that , given the sophisticated and complex nature of this responsibility , the establishment of a possible conflict of interest should be de-politicised and performed in an independent and systematic way with the assistance of a body with the relevant expertise and experience; ### 5. considers that , given the sophisticated and complex nature of this responsibility , the establishment of a possible conflict of interest should be de-politicised and performed independently , excluding from the process members of parliament belonging to the same political party and of the same nationality as the candidate under investigation;


### 6. considers that this monitoring capacity should include the verification of the veracity of the declaration of financial interests , the handling of conflicts of interest , checks on transparency obligations and the verification of compliance with revolving doors rules; ### 6. recommends empowering the european anti-fraud office (olaf) or the european ombudsman with the responsibility to carry out oversight on conflicts of interests , revolving doors and lobby transparency for eu institutions and agencies;


### 6. considers that for proper expertise to be acquired , the future ethics body should have a permanent , independent and collegiate structure , and that its composition could be based either on specific institutional positions , such as that of the president of the court of justice , or on the nomination of experts by each eu institution; ### deleted


### 7. takes the view that the eu ethics body could also be given authority over the obligations imposed by the transparency register; ### deleted


### 7. recommends therefore that , while fully keeping its competence on the matter , the committee on legal affairs decide on the existence of a conflict of interest after having received a non-binding recommendation by such an independent expert advisory body; ### 7. recommends , therefore , that the committee on legal affairs should retain in full its exclusive power to decide whether a potential conflict of interests exists , and where there are reasonable and/or reasoned doubts , the committee on legal affairs must be able to request a detailed report from a committee set up at its request at no cost to the budget and comprising eu officials with sufficient , proven knowledge in the area concerned;


### 8. considers that the eu ethics body should have the power to initiate procedures and to conduct investigations based on the information it has collected or that it has received from third parties; ### deleted


### 8. believes furthermore that this future advisory body could also be entrusted with the broader task of examining conflicts of interest within the eu institutions and agencies in general , playing , in a complementary and balanced way , a preventive role via awareness raising and ethical guidance powers on the one hand , and a compliance role on the other. ### deleted


### 9. believes that in relation to its enforcement powers , the body could take over from the appointing authority in dealing with staff ethics obligations , and that in relation to members of parliament or commissioners , the body could be granted enforcement powers within the limits of the provisions contained in the treaties , and without prejudice to any additional mechanisms provided for in parliament’s rules of procedure , in particular concerning termination of office; ### deleted


### 11. believes that the decision on the absence of conflicts of interest of commissioners-designate should remain a competence of parliament’s committee on legal affairs , while the eu ethics body should support the process with the publication of its analysis of each individual case and make its investigative capacities available; ### 11. believes that the decision on the absence of conflicts of interest of commissioners-designate should remain a competence of parliament’s committee on legal affairs


### composition ### deleted


### 12. believes that the ethics body should be composed of nine members , three selected by the commission , three elected by parliament , and three assigned de jure from among the former presidents of the court of justice of the european union (cjeu) , the court of auditors and former eu ombudsmen; ### deleted


### 13. considers that its members must be independent , chosen on the basis of their competence , experience and professional qualities , as well as their personal integrity , have an impeccable record of ethical behaviour and provide a declaration of the absence of conflicts of interest; is of the opinion that the composition of the body should be gender-balanced; ### deleted


### 13. considers that its members must be independent , chosen on the basis of their competence , experience and professional qualities , as well as their personal integrity , have an impeccable record of ethical behaviour and provide a declaration of the absence of conflicts of interest; is of the opinion that the composition of the body should be gender-balanced; ### 13. considers that its members must be independent , chosen on the basis of their competence , experience and professional qualities , as well as their personal integrity , have an impeccable record of ethical behaviour and provide a declaration of the absence of conflicts of interest;


### 14. suggests that each institution choose these members in particular from among former judges of the cjeu , former or current members of highest courts of member states , former members of the european parliament , former staff of the participating institutions and bodies , former eu ombudsmen , and members of the ethics authorities in member states; suggests further that the body elect a president and two vice-presidents from among its members; ### deleted


### 15. insists that the college be supported by a secretariat with the human , material and financial resources commensurate with its mandate and tasks; ### 15. doubts the necessity of establishing a new interinstitutional body , as it might lead to additional financial expenditure on top of the existing bodies at the eu level which are already dealing with similar issues;


### 15. insists that the college be supported by a secretariat with the human , material and financial resources commensurate with its mandate and tasks; ### 15. insists that the college be supported by a secretariat using available human and material resources , without necessitating any increase in the administrative budget of the european institutions;


### 16. proposes a two-step approach whereby , in the event that the eu ethics body becomes aware of a breach or possible breach of ethics rules , it first recommends actions to put an end to the breach; considers that this first preventive step should ensure confidentiality and the right of the person to be heard; suggests that in the event that the individual concerned refuses to take the appropriate actions , the eu ethics body should make relevant information about the case publicly available and decide , if appropriate , on sanctions; considers that this two-step approach should apply provided that there are no reasonable grounds to believe that the individual acted in bad faith and recommends that intentional breach , gross negligence , the concealment of evidence and non-compliance with the obligation to cooperate should be , as such , subject to sanctions , even when the breach itself has ceased; ### 16. proposes an approach whereby , in the event that the eu ethics body becomes aware of a breach or possible breach of ethics rules , it recommends actions to put an end to the breach; considers that this preventive step should ensure confidentiality and the right of the person to be heard;


### 18. insists that the decisions of the eu ethics body should be legally binding , reviewable before the cjeu and subject to possible complaints to the eu ombudsman; ### deleted


### — having regard to the charter of fundamental rights of the european union , in particular article 35 thereof , ### — having regard to the charter of fundamental rights of the european union , in particular article 3 and article 35 thereof ,


### c. whereas transparency in the research and development of covid-19 vaccines is the prerequisite for public trust in vaccines , and any lack of transparency leads to uncertainty and disinformation and thus undermines rapid and effective action against the pandemic; ### c. whereas transparency in the research and development of covid-19 vaccines is the prerequisite for public trust in vaccines , and any lack of transparency leads to uncertainty , disinformation and thus undermines rapid and effective action against the pandemic; whereas the lack of transparency may contribute to reluctance to vaccinate in general;


### c. whereas transparency in the research and development of covid-19 vaccines is the prerequisite for public trust in vaccines , and any lack of transparency leads to uncertainty and disinformation and thus undermines rapid and effective action against the pandemic; ### c. whereas transparency in the research and development of covid-19 vaccines is the fundamental prerequisite for public trust in vaccines , and any lack of transparency leads to uncertainty and disinformation and thus undermines rapid and effective action against the pandemic;


### d. whereas transparency in the purchase and distribution of covid-19 vaccines establishes the basis for vaccine cooperation in europe and is the key way of combating “vaccine nationalism” and direct purchases , that exacerbate a geopolitical vaccine race , in which poor countries will receive the vaccines last; ### d. whereas transparency in the purchase and distribution of covid-19 vaccines establishes the basis for vaccine cooperation in europe;


### e. whereas the handling of the covid-19 pandemic is the trust exam in front of all european citizens in the view of possible future public health emergencies; ### e. whereas the handling of the covid-19 pandemic is the trust exam in front of all member states and eu institutions in the view of possible future public health emergencies;


### 2. expresses its deepest concern on the lack of transparency by the commission and member states in the development , purchase and distribution of covid-19 vaccines; ### 2. condemns the lack of transparency by the commission and member states in the development , purchase and distribution of covid-19 vaccines;


### 2. expresses its deepest concern on the lack of transparency by the commission and member states in the development , purchase and distribution of covid-19 vaccines; ### 2. expresses its deepest concern on the lack of transparency by the commission in the development , purchase and distribution of covid-19 vaccines;


### 4. calls on the commission to disclose the names of experts or at the very least the list of seven member states represented in the negotiating team involved in negotiating advance purchase agreements and purchase agreements with pharmaceutical companies for the purchase of a covid-19 vaccine; ### 4. calls on the commission to disclose the names of experts and the list of seven member states represented in the negotiating team involved in negotiating advance purchase agreements and purchase agreements with pharmaceutical companies for the purchase of a covid-19 vaccine;


### 5. calls on the commission to publish non-redacted versions of the advance purchase agreements and the purchase agreement and in particular to disclose the following details: the advance payments by the commission , the cost sharing between public and private investments in the vaccines , the number of doses given to each country and to be delivered per quarter , the prices per dose , the number and locations of available production sites , the liability and compensation regimes for any harm that might be caused by the vaccines , the sanctions in case of breach of contract and information on the possible sharing of intellectual property rights; ### 5. calls on the commission to publish non-redacted versions of the advance purchase agreements and the purchase agreement without further delay and in particular to disclose the following details: the advance payments by the commission , the cost sharing between public and private investments in the vaccines , the number of doses given to each country and to be delivered per quarter , the prices per dose , the number and locations of available production sites , the liability and compensation regimes for any harm that might be caused by the vaccines , the sanctions in case of breach of contract and delivery delays as well as information on the possible sharing of intellectual property rights;


### 6. calls on the commission to make the disclosure of all details of future covid-19 vaccine contracts a precondition for future negotiations with pharmaceutical companies; ### 6. calls on the commission to make the disclosure of all details of future covid-19 vaccine contracts and compliance with these contracts a precondition for future negotiations with pharmaceutical companies;


### 2. recalls that the eu is the main trade partner of the western balkan countries and that bilateral trade doubled between 2006 and 2016; notes , however , that the eu continuously runs an unsustainable trade surplus with the western balkans; ### 2. recalls that the eu is the main trade partner of the western balkan countries and that bilateral trade doubled between 2006 and 2016; notes that this trade expansion has overall been to the benefit of the western balkan partners as in the last 10 years , the region increased its exports to the eu by 130% against a more modest increase of eu exports to the region of 49%;


### 5. demands strong integration efforts in order to support western balkan countries in promoting improvement of the rule of law , democracy and human rights so as to enhance economic competitiveness , budgetary balance and structural reform; ### 5. demands strong integration efforts in order to support western balkan countries in promoting improvement of the rule of law , democracy , human rights and fight against corruption , so as to improve business environment , enhance economic competitiveness , budgetary balance and structural reform;


### 6. reminds the western balkan countries of the importance of regional economic cooperation and good neighbourly relations; ### 6. reminds the western balkan countries of the importance of regional economic cooperation , wider market environment and good neighbourly relations;


### 8. requests that the commission provide further technical support to the western balkans to improve the external investment framework , in particular in the areas of predictability and investor protection; ### 8. requests that the commission provide further technical support to the western balkans , especially its private sector , to improve the external investment framework , in particular in the areas of predictability and investor protection;


### 9. urges the western balkan countries to stick to projects in the energy sector which help to meet climate objectives and are aligned with eu environmental legislation; ### 9. underlines that energy industries in the western balkans remain defined by outdated infrastructure , the overwhelming dominance of coal and hydropower , urges the western balkan countries to stick to projects in the energy sector which reduce energy poverty , increase energy efficiency and security and help to meet climate objectives and are aligned with eu environmental legislation;


### 1. considers that sustainable corporate governance is key to the long-term direction of undertakings and to aligning their activities to the achievement of the union’s overall environmental objectives as laid down in the european green deal , as well as the union’s 2050 climate neutrality objective , namely that all sectors should contribute to reaching that target; ### 1. considers that sustainable corporate governance is key to the long-term direction of undertakings and to aligning their activities to the achievement of the union’s overall environmental objectives as outlined in the european green deal , namely that all sectors should contribute to reaching that target;


### 2. emphasises that sustainable corporate governance can help the eu to build a more resilient and sustainable economy , improve the level playing field and protect eu businesses and citizens , and is therefore hugely beneficial to eu trade policy; ### 2. emphasises that sustainable corporate governance can help the eu to build a more resilient and sustainable economy , improve the level playing field and protect eu notes that all this can be achieved only through effective protection from unfair competition from third countries and the full implementation of the principles of reciprocity.


### 2. considers furthermore that the current approach of having commission guidelines on non-financial reporting by companies is insufficient on its own to bring about the desired outcome of comparable , reliable and consistent reporting by undertakings; ### 2. considers that the current policy on non-financial reporting by companies is still too inefficient and in order to bring about the desired outcome of comparable , reliable and consistent reporting by undertakings , urges the commission , in cooperation with the member states , to provide assistance and guidance in supporting companies in their efforts; stresses in particular the importance of assisting smes in their efforts to monitor and adjust their corporate models and address the administrative requirements connected to non financial reporting and the studies required;


### 3. calls in this regard for the adoption of european standards with well-defined requirements in terms of the content and accessibility of non-financial information that should apply to at least all listed and non-listed large undertakings operating in the eu; ### 3. calls in this regard for the adoption of european standards with well-defined requirements in terms of the content and accessibility of non-financial information that should apply to at least all listed and non-listed large undertakings operating in the eu , taking into consideration their size and operational capacities , as well as geo-economic specificities;


### 3. considers that the concept of environmental matters in the nfrd should be interpreted in line with the taxonomy regulation; considers it equally important to define with precision the other sustainability matters to which the directive refers , such as the concepts of social and employee matters , respect for human rights and anti-corruption and bribery; ### 3. considers that the concept of environmental matters in the nfrd should be interpreted in line with the taxonomy regulation; considers it equally important to define with precision the other sustainability matters to which the directive refers , such as the concepts of social and employee matters , respect for human rights , anti-corruption and bribery , and protection and promotion of the specific features , traditions and typical skills of the territories in which the company operates and produces;


### 4. calls on the commission to commit to developing such standards during the upcoming review of the non-financial reporting directive; ### 4. calls on the commission to commit to developing such standards during the upcoming review of the non-financial reporting directive , in close cooperation with the member states;


### 5. stresses that directors’ duties should encompass an obligation to develop , disclose and implement a corporate sustainability strategy for all aspects of the company’s operations , including its supply chains; ### 5. stresses that directors should be encouraged to develop , disclose and implement a corporate sustainability strategy for all aspects of the company’s operations , including its supply chains;


### 5. further considers that consistency of eu legislation on sustainable corporate governance should be achieved through the introduction of concrete obligations to be carried out and not only the obligation to report information; ### 5. further considers that the possible introduction of new specific eu legislation on sustainable corporate governance should be preceded by an in-depth impact and added-value assessment , outlining the various legal options available at union level , without undermining subsidiarity and member states' competences;


### 6. stresses that the requirement to disclose information on how sustainability issues affect the company and how the company affects society and the environment should include the sharing of all relevant information on all actors throughout the entire supply chain; ### 6. stresses the importance to disclose information on how companies' sustainability issues affect the company and how the company affects society and the environment should include the sharing of all relevant information on all actors throughout the entire supply chain;


### 7. notes that sustainable corporate governance cannot reach its full potential without due diligence legislation that requires companies to identify , prevent , mitigate and account for human rights abuses and environmental damage in their global value chains. ### 7. notes that sustainable corporate governance cannot reach its full potential without due diligence legislation that encourages companies to identify , prevent , mitigate and account for human rights abuses and environmental damage in their global value chains.


### h. whereas the consistency of eu legislation on sustainable corporate governance should be achieved through the establishment of concrete obligations to do and not only to report information; whereas an additional framework defining company boards’ duties in terms of sustainability is therefore necessary; ### h. whereas the consistency of eu legislation on sustainable corporate governance should be achieved through the establishment of concrete indications to do and not only to report information; whereas an additional framework defining , on a voluntary basis , company boards’ duties in terms of sustainability is therefore necessary;


### 9. urges the council to initiate without delay negotiations with parliament on the proposal for a directive on improving the gender balance among non-executive directors of companies listed on stock exchanges and related measures(com(2012)0614) (‘the women on boards proposal’) , which sets out to put an end to the pervasive imbalance between women and men at the highest-levels of decision-making in companies; ### deleted


### 10. notes the major role of directors in defining a company’s strategy and overseeing its operations; considers that directors should have a duty to integrate long-term interests and sustainability risks , impacts , opportunities and dependencies in the overall strategy of the company; ### 10. notes the major role of directors in defining a company’s strategy and overseeing its operations; considers that directors should be encouraged to integrate long-term interests and sustainability risks , impacts , opportunities and dependencies in the overall strategy of the company;


### 12. considers that the sustainability strategy should identify and address , in line with companies’ due diligence obligations , the significant impacts that the company might have on environmental , climate , social and employee matters , respect for human rights and anti-corruption and bribery matters connected to the company’s business model , operations and supply chains , including outside the european union; considers that the duty of care that directors owe to the company requires also taking into consideration the interest of stakeholders who may be adversely impacted by the company’s activities; ### 12. considers that the sustainability strategy should identify and address , in line with companies’ due diligence obligations , the significant impacts that the company might have on employment , environmental , climate , social and employee matters , respect for human rights and anti-corruption and bribery matters connected to the company’s business model , operations and supply chains , including outside the european union; considers that the duty of care that directors owe to the company requires also taking into consideration the interest of stakeholders who may be adversely impacted by the company’s activities;


### 13. further considers that the sustainability strategy should include measurable , specific , time-bound and science-based targets aligned with the union’s commitments at international level on the environment , climate change , particularly the paris agreement , biodiversity , and deforestation; stresses that it should also include policies on gender equality , the better integration of employee’s rights in the business activities and a definition of a fair salary policy , and sector-specific and/or geographical matters; believes that the variable part of the remuneration of directors should be linked to the achievement of the measurable targets set in the company’s sustainability strategy; ### 13. further considers that the sustainability strategy should include measurable , specific , time-bound and science-based targets aligned with the union’s commitments at international level on the environment , climate change , particularly the paris agreement , biodiversity , and deforestation; stresses that it should also include policies on combating unemployment and promoting european production , gender equality , the better integration of employee’s rights in the business activities and a definition of a fair salary policy , and sector-specific and/or geographical matters; believes that the variable part of the remuneration of directors should be linked to the achievement of the measurable targets set in the company’s sustainability strategy;


### 1. highlights that connectivity as a fundamental orientation of the european union is deeply ingrained in the eu’s approach to domestic and international challenges; points out with pride that connectivity policies have been implemented successfully in many of the eu’s external relations; encourages the commission and eeas to create a global eu connectivity strategy (‘the strategy’) as an extension of the current eu-asia connectivity strategy in order to align our connectivity philosophy and connectivity policies with the goal of strengthening the eu’s role as a true geopolitical and geo-economic actor; ### 1. highlights that connectivity as a fundamental orientation of the european union is deeply ingrained in the eu’s approach to domestic and international challenges; points out that connectivity policies have been implemented successfully in many of the eu’s external relations; encourages the commission and eeas to create a global eu connectivity strategy (‘the strategy’) as an extension of the current eu-asia connectivity strategy in order to align our connectivity philosophy and connectivity policies with the goal of strengthening the eu’s role as a strong geopolitical and geo-economic factor;


### 2. expects the strategy to contribute to implementing the eu’s main framework policies of building a strong and fair union , investing in peaceful international relations , achieving economic progress on the basis of the european green deal and the digital transformation , and promoting global justice; ### 2. expects the strategy to contribute to implementing the eu’s main framework policies of building a strong and fair union , investing in peaceful international relations , achieving economic progress on the basis of the paris climate agreement and the digital transformation , and promoting global justice;


### 3. is of the view that the strategy must comprehensively address a broad spectrum of political , economic , cultural , sustainability and security dimensions based on the eu’s fundamental values and its shared interests; insists that the values of freedom , human rights , rule of law , democracy , solidarity , sustainability , inclusiveness , transparency , reciprocity and the adherence to multilateralism must guide the strategy; ### 3. is of the view that the strategy must comprehensively address a broad spectrum of political , economic , cultural , sustainability and security dimensions based on the eu’s fundamental values and its shared interests; insists that the values of freedom , human rights , rule of law , democracy , solidarity , sustainability , inclusiveness , transparency , level playing field , reciprocity and the adherence to multilateralism must guide the strategy;


### 4. invites economic and societal stakeholders at the eu level and in the member states to participate in the development of the strategy; ### deleted


### 5. highlights the importance of the ongoing work of the eu-china connectivity platform in its efforts to explore opportunities for cooperation in the area of transport between the eu’s ten-t network and china’s belt and road initiative (bri); acknowledges the importance of working towards greater transparency , reciprocity in market access and a level playing field for businesses in the area of transport infrastructure development with china. ### 5. highlights the importance of the ongoing work of the eu-china connectivity platform in its efforts to explore opportunities for cooperation in the area of transport between the eu’s ten-t network and china’s belt and road initiative (bri); acknowledges the importance of working towards greater transparency , reciprocity in market access and a level playing field for businesses in the area of transport infrastructure development with china; looks forward to the implementation of the joint study to be launched by the connectivity platform on sustainable railway based transport corridors between europe and china.


### c. whereas the eu-japan connectivity partnership of 2019 gave additional relevance to this strategy; whereas partnerships with other asian partners should be established; whereas africa should be designated a connectivity priority region as much as asia; ### c. whereas the eu-japan connectivity partnership of 2019 gave additional relevance to this strategy; whereas partnerships with other asian partners should be established;


### 6. gives greatest emphasis to the need for a fair partnership with respective countries; believes the strategy must create shared benefits , prevent one-sided dependencies or debt traps , empower self-determination , and be conducted with mutual respect; ### 6. gives greatest emphasis to the need for a fair partnership with respective countries; believes the strategy must create shared benefits , prevent one-sided dependencies or debt traps , empower self-determination , guarantee reciprocal market access , and be conducted with mutual respect;


### 7. stresses that the strategy must be coordinated with the pursuit of internal connectivity within the eu; ### 7. stresses that the strategy must be coordinated with the pursuit of internal connectivity within the eu as well as between the eu and prospective members of the union;


### 13. believes that the fight against climate change , for the decarbonisation of economies , for the preservation of biodiversity and the environment should be an overarching priority of the strategy , in particular with regard to infrastructure development; calls for a systematic greening of all connectivity investments; attaches high priority to the greening of development cooperation , infrastructure investment across the board , and in particular the energy dimension; ### 13. believes that the response to climate change , for the decarbonisation of economies , for the preservation of biodiversity and the environment should be an overarching priority of the strategy , in particular with regard to infrastructure development; calls for a systematic greening of relevant connectivity investments; attaches high priority to the greening of development cooperation , infrastructure investment across the board , and in particular the energy dimension;


### 14. calls on the commission and the member states to step up their ambition for the digital transformation; expects the eu to become a competitive global actor in digitalisation on a par with the us and china; considers , in this context , the promotion of digital connectivity a high priority for the eu; believes that the development of open strategic autonomy in this sector must include digitalisation partnerships with third countries; underlines that the eu should aim at co-leadership in setting and defending international standards and practices; ### 14. calls on the commission and the member states to step up their ambition for the digital transformation; expects the eu to become a competitive global actor in digitalisation on a par with the us and china; considers , in this context , the promotion of digital connectivity a high priority for the eu; believes that the development of open strategic autonomy in this sector must include digitalisation partnerships with third countries; underlines that the eu should aim at co-leadership in setting and defending international standards and practices; notes that the eu should be a norm-setter rather than norm-taker in the field of digital connectivity , digitalisation and data protection;


### 15. believes that the people-to-people dimension is a fundamental pillar of the strategy requiring further prioritisation; puts great emphasis on the promotion of people-to-people contacts among students , vocational trainees , young professionals , academics and researchers as key to mutual understanding and respect; advocates such cooperation based on inclusiveness; calls in particular for the strengthening of the youth dimension through youth fora to mutually promote foreign language proficiency , student and academic exchanges , and the mutual recognition of diplomas; ### 15. believes that the people-to-people dimension is a fundamental pillar of the strategy requiring further prioritisation; puts great emphasis on the promotion of people-to-people contacts among students , vocational trainees , young professionals , academics and researchers as key to mutual understanding and respect; advocates such cooperation based on inclusiveness and reciprocity; calls in particular for the strengthening of the youth dimension through youth fora to mutually promote foreign language proficiency , student and academic exchanges , and the mutual recognition of diplomas;


### 16. commends the initiatives adopted for the western balkans aiming to promote youth cooperation and exchanges , as well as vocational education and training , and encourages offering similar programmes to other partners of the connectivity strategy , starting with the eastern partnership countries; ### 16. commends the initiatives adopted for the western balkans aiming to promote youth cooperation and exchanges , as well as vocational education and training , and encourages offering similar programmes to other partners of the connectivity strategy , starting with the eastern partnership countries; notes that connectivity between the eu and the western balkans is integral for the eu connectivity strategy considering the countries of the region are prospective members of the union


### 18. believes that the covid-19 pandemic has demonstrated the urgency of prioritising the health sector as a new crucial area for cooperation , in particular on the resilience of health systems , access to medicines , medical equipment and vaccines , avoiding one-sided dependencies , ensuring safe and diverse pharmaceutical and health-related industrial supply chains , and exchange of best practices in crisis management and pandemic prevention policies; ### 18. believes that the covid-19 pandemic has demonstrated the urgency of prioritising the health sector as a new crucial area for cooperation , in particular on the resilience of health systems , access to medicines , medical equipment and vaccines , avoiding one-sided dependencies , ensuring safe and diverse pharmaceutical and health-related industrial supply chains , and exchange of best practices in crisis management and pandemic prevention policies; notes however , that the union should pursue and demand a transparent , coherent and independent investigation on the reasons for the initial outbreak of the covid-19 pandemic in china.; calls on the chinese authorities to grant access to independent international experts with the aim to review the reasons for the outbreak of covid-19;


### 20. strongly welcomes the establishment of the eu-japan partnership on sustainable connectivity and quality infrastructure , with its focus on the western balkans , eastern europe , central asia , the indo-pacific and africa; applauds japan for pro-actively proposing practical steps to realise agreed ambitions; hopes that the eu and japan will manage to kick-start the operationalisation of the partnership in the first half of 2021; ### 20. strongly welcomes the establishment of the eu-japan partnership on sustainable connectivity and quality infrastructure , with its focus on the western balkans , eastern europe , central asia , the indo-pacific and africa; applauds japan for pro-actively proposing practical steps to realise agreed ambitions; hopes that the eu and japan will manage to kick-start the operationalisation of the partnership in the first half of 2021; welcomes the eu-japan economic partnership agreement , which entered into force on the 1st of february 2019;


### 21. strongly welcomes ongoing negotiations for building a connectivity partnership with india; hopes that the rotating eu council presidencies , as well as the subsequent g20 presidencies , of italy and india will use their leverage to move forward; welcomes also the eu-korean exploratory exchanges on a connectivity partnership , and hopes it will make good headway in 2021; advocates the establishment of an eu-asean connectivity partnership aiming at interconnecting with asean’s already existing connectivity master plan and project pipeline; ### 21. strongly welcomes ongoing negotiations for building a connectivity partnership with india; hopes that the rotating eu council presidencies , as well as the subsequent g20 presidencies , of italy and india will use their leverage to move forward; welcomes also the eu-korean exploratory exchanges on a connectivity partnership , and hopes it will make good headway in 2021; advocates the establishment of an eu-asean connectivity partnership aiming at interconnecting with asean’s already existing connectivity master plan and project pipeline; encourages the eu to make use of the network of taiwan’s new southbound policy and to explore the possibility of establishing an eu-taiwan connectivity partnership , which would be conducive to boosting cooperation in enhancing people-to-people contact and narrowing digital gap in the southeast asia region.


### 21. strongly welcomes ongoing negotiations for building a connectivity partnership with india; hopes that the rotating eu council presidencies , as well as the subsequent g20 presidencies , of italy and india will use their leverage to move forward; welcomes also the eu-korean exploratory exchanges on a connectivity partnership , and hopes it will make good headway in 2021; advocates the establishment of an eu-asean connectivity partnership aiming at interconnecting with asean’s already existing connectivity master plan and project pipeline; ### 21. strongly welcomes ongoing negotiations for building a connectivity partnership with india; hopes that the rotating eu council presidencies , as well as the subsequent g20 presidencies , of italy and india will use their leverage to move forward; welcomes also the eu-korean exploratory exchanges on a connectivity partnership , and hopes it will make good headway in 2021; advocates the establishment of an eu-asean connectivity partnership aiming at interconnecting with asean’s already existing connectivity master plan and project pipeline; notes that the foreseen comprehensive air transport agreement (cata) between the eu and asean will be the first block-to-block agreement in the aviation sector;


### 23. is also willing to consider partnership with the chinese belt and road initiative in specific cases where this does not compromise core eu principles; ### 23. is also willing to consider partnership with the chinese belt and road initiative in specific cases where this does not compromise core eu principles; notes however that china is a systemic rival of the union and that the belt and road initiative stands at the core of the assertive foreign policy of china


### 25. emphasises strongly that the global eu connectivity strategy must pay particular attention to connectivity with the neighbouring continent of africa; expects this effort to integrate the eu’s experience with policies promoting connectivity implemented in africa through development cooperation; calls for this goal to be discussed at a high level with the african union , and for it to result in an eu-africa connectivity partnership by the end of 2021; ### deleted


### 26. expects the commission to present a new communication approach with a clear narrative in order to create adequate visibility for eu connectivity policies and their results; ### 26. expects the commission to present a new communication approach with a clear narrative in order to create adequate visibility and sufficient accountability for eu connectivity policies and their results;


### 1. takes note of the commission’s initiatives to support european smes’ access to international markets; stresses , however , that smes have to deal with too many regulations and burdens and excessive bureaucracy; stresses that smes are kept at a competitive disadvantage by investing in climate neutrality to comply with the green deal while trying to remain competitive and thrive on export markets; ### 1. takes note of the commission’s initiatives to support european smes’ access to international markets; calls for the need to include a separate chapter for sme's in all future trade agreements to ensure sme's reap maximal fruits of the market access gained; calls furthermore on the commission to support the national and regional export agencies in their efforts to allow sme's to take best advantage of trade agreements. indicates in this regard the new role and functioning of the chief trade enforcement officer , stresses , however , that smes have to deal with too many regulations and burdens and excessive bureaucracy; stresses that smes are kept at a competitive disadvantage by investing in climate neutrality to comply with the green deal while trying to remain competitive and thrive on export markets;


### 1. recalls that the eu’s industrial future is linked to an alignment of the economy with the principles of the european green deal , a roadmap towards a new growth policy for the eu , bringing citizens , cities and regions together , and allowing for a just transition; ### 1. stresses that while the eu's industrial future is connected to the principles of the european green deal too , account needs to be taken of the economic and employment repercussions of the covid-19 pandemic in a roadmap towards a new growth policy for the eu , bringing businesses , smes in particular , stakeholders , regions and local authorities together , and allowing for a just transition without further penalising the eu's economic and productive system;


### 1. recalls that the eu’s industrial future is linked to an alignment of the economy with the principles of the european green deal , a roadmap towards a new growth policy for the eu , bringing citizens , cities and regions together , and allowing for a just transition; ### 1. recalls that the eu’s industrial future is linked above all to a full economic recovery following the pandemic crisis and to a roadmap towards a new growth policy for the eu carrying citizens , cities and regions to the same higher level of development , and allowing for a just transition;


### 1. recalls that the eu’s industrial future is linked to an alignment of the economy with the principles of the european green deal , a roadmap towards a new growth policy for the eu , bringing citizens , cities and regions together , and allowing for a just transition; ### 1. recalls that the eu’s industrial future is linked to an alignment of the economy with the principles of the european green deal , a roadmap towards a new sustainable growth policy for the eu , bringing citizens , regions and member states together , and allowing for a fair and just transition which leaves no one behind;


### a. whereas today eu industry employs around 35 million people and accounts for over 80 % of exports; whereas women still remain under-represented across industrial sectors , occupations and management levels; ### a. whereas today eu industry employs around 35 million people , generates several millions industry-linked jobs and accounts for over 80 % of exports and has dominant role in placing direct foreign investments; whereas women still remain under-represented across industrial sectors , occupations and management levels;


### a. whereas today eu industry employs around 35 million people and accounts for over 80 % of exports; whereas women still remain under-represented across industrial sectors , occupations and management levels; ### a. whereas today eu industry employs around 35 million people and accounts for over 80 % of exports; whereas the rate of women across industrial sectors is lower than the rate of men , from education ant training to occupations and management levels;


### a. whereas a domestic industry is a motor of growth , innovation and social well-being within the eu; ### a. whereas a domestic industry is a motor of growth , export , innovation and social well-being within the eu;


### b. whereas the eu industrial strategy must serve as a vector for creating more and better jobs and achieve an inclusive and balanced job market , accompanying the transition towards a digital and carbon-neutral industry; ### b. whereas the eu industrial strategy must serve as a vector for creating more and better jobs and achieve an inclusive and balanced job market , accompanying the transition towards a digital industry;


### b. whereas the eu’s smes have traditionally generated a high share of the eu’s employment , and in so doing have ensured social and economic well-being and prosperity; ### b. whereas the eu’s microenterprises and smes have traditionally generated a high share of the eu’s employment , and in so doing have ensured social and economic well-being and prosperity;


### b. whereas the eu’s smes have traditionally generated a high share of the eu’s employment , and in so doing have ensured social and economic well-being and prosperity; ### b. whereas the eu’s smes have traditionally generated a high share of the eu’s employment , and in so doing have ensured social and economic well-being and prosperity , while creating innovative job opportunities and enhancing healthy competition in the single market;


### 2. notes that investment in innovative means of production should foster cohesion amongst all eu regions , allowing them to accomplish fair and inclusive economic growth; ### 2. stresses that investment in innovative means of production should foster cohesion amongst all eu regions , while respecting their individual characteristics and diversity , allowing them to accomplish fair , inclusive and realistically sustainable economic growth;


### 2. notes that investment in innovative means of production should foster cohesion amongst all eu regions , allowing them to accomplish fair and inclusive economic growth; ### 2. notes that investment in traditional and innovative means of production should foster cohesion amongst all eu regions , allowing them to accomplish fair and inclusive economic growth;


### 3. stresses that in supporting smes through the european structural and investment funds (esif) the goal should be , inter alia , an innovative and smart economic transformation , a greener and low carbon eu , as well as an eu which is more connected and aims to ensure long-term and sustainable employment; ### 3. stresses that in supporting microenterprises and smes through the european structural and investment funds (esif) the goal should be , inter alia , an innovative and smart economic transformation , a greener and low carbon eu , as well as an eu which is more connected and aims to ensure long-term and sustainable employment;


### 3. stresses that in supporting smes through the european structural and investment funds (esif) the goal should be , inter alia , an innovative and smart economic transformation , a greener and low carbon eu , as well as an eu which is more connected and aims to ensure long-term and sustainable employment; ### 3. stresses that in supporting smes through the european structural and investment funds (esif) the goal should be , inter alia , an innovative and smart economic transformation , as well as an eu which is more connected and aims to ensure long-term and sustainable employment;