### (58) restoration targets and obligations for habitats and species protected under directives 92/43/eec and 2009/147/ec , for pollinators and for freshwater , urban , agricultural and forest ecosystems should be complementary and work in synergy , with a view to achieving the overarching objective of restoring ecosystems across the union’s land and sea areas. the restoration measures required to achieve one specific target will in many cases contribute to the achievement of other targets or obligations. member states should therefore plan restoration measures strategically with a view to maximising their effectiveness in contributing to the recovery of nature across the union. restoration measures should also be planned in such manner that they address climate change mitigation and climate change adaptation and the prevention and control of the impact of natural disasters. they should aim at optimising the ecological , economic and social functions of ecosystems , including their productivity potential , taking into account their contribution to the sustainable development of the relevant regions and communities. it is important that member states prepare detailed national restoration plans based on the best available scientific evidence , and that the public is given early and effective opportunities to participate in the preparation of the plans. member states should take account of the specific conditions and needs in their territory , in order for the plans to respond to the relevant pressures , threats and drivers of biodiversity loss , and should cooperate to ensure restoration and connectivity across borders. ### (58) restoration targets and obligations for habitats and species protected under directives 92/43/eec and 2009/147/ec , for pollinators and for freshwater , urban , agricultural and forest ecosystems should be complementary and work in synergy , with a view to achieving the overarching objective of restoring ecosystems across the union’s land and sea areas. the restoration measures required to achieve one specific target will in many cases contribute to the achievement of other targets or obligations. member states should therefore plan restoration measures strategically with a view to maximising their effectiveness in contributing to the recovery of nature across the union. restoration measures may contribute to climate change mitigation and climate change adaptation and the prevention and control of the impact of natural disasters. they should aim at optimising the ecological , economic and social functions of areas , including their productivity potential , taking into account their contribution to the sustainable development of the relevant regions and communities. it is important that member states prepare detailed national restoration plans based on the best available scientific evidence , and that the public is given early and effective opportunities to participate in the preparation of the plans. member states involve stakeholders at an early stage in developing and shaping the restoration plan. member states should take account of the specific conditions and needs in their territory , in order for the plans to respond to the relevant pressures , threats and drivers of biodiversity loss , and should cooperate to ensure restoration and connectivity across borders.


### (60) in order to ensure coherence between the objectives of this regulation and directive (eu) 2018/200184 , regulation (eu) 2018/199985 and directive 98/70/ec of the european parliament and of the council as regards the promotion of energy from renewable sources86 , in particular , during the preparation of national restoration plans , member states should take account of the potential for renewable energy projects to make contributions towards meeting nature restoration objectives. ### (60) in order to ensure coherence between the objectives of this regulation and regulation (eu) 2018/199985 and directive 98/70/ec of the european parliament and of the council as regards the promotion of energy from renewable sources86 , in particular , during the preparation of national restoration plans , member states should take account of the potential for renewable energy projects to make contributions towards meeting nature restoration objectives.


### (61) considering the importance of addressing consistently the dual challenges of biodiversity loss and climate change , the restoration of biodiversity should take into account the deployment of renewable energy and vice versa. the communication on repowereu: joint european action for more affordable , secure and sustainable energy87 states that member states should swiftly map , assess and ensure suitable land and sea areas that are available for renewable energy projects , commensurate with their national energy and climate plans , the contributions towards the revised 2030 renewable energy target and other factors such as the availability of resources , grid infrastructure and the targets of the eu biodiversity strategy. the commission proposal for a directive of the european parliament and of the council amending directive (eu) 2018/2001 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources , directive 2010/31/eu on the energy performance of buildings and directive 2012/27/eu on energy efficiency88 and the commission recommendation on accelerating permitting for renewable energy projects and facilitating power purchase agreements89 , both adopted on 18 may 2022 , also provide for the identification of renewables go-to areas. those are specific locations , whether on land or sea , particularly suitable for the installation of plants for the production of energy from renewable sources , other than biomass combustion plants , where the deployment of a specific type of renewable energy is not expected to have significant environmental impacts , in view of the particularities of the selected territory. member states should give priority to artificial and built surfaces , such as rooftops , transport infrastructure areas , parking areas , waste sites , industrial sites , mines , artificial inland water bodies , lakes or reservoirs , and , where appropriate , urban waste water treatment sites , as well as degraded land not usable for agriculture. in the designation of renewables go-to areas , member states should avoid protected areas and consider their national nature restoration plans. member states should coordinate the development of national restoration plans with the designation of the renewables go-to areas. during the preparation of the nature restoration plans , member states should ensure synergies with the already designated renewables go-to areas and ensure that the functioning of the renewables go-to areas , including the permitting procedures applicable in the renewables go-to areas foreseen by directive (eu) 2018/2001 , remain unchanged. ### (61) considering the importance of addressing consistently the dual challenges of biodiversity loss and climate change , the restoration of biodiversity should take into account the deployment of renewable energy and vice versa. the communication on repowereu: joint european action for more affordable , secure and sustainable energy87 states that member states should swiftly map , assess and ensure suitable land and sea areas that are available for renewable energy projects , commensurate with their national energy and climate plans , the contributions towards the revised 2030 renewable energy target and other factors such as the availability of resources , grid infrastructure and the targets of the eu biodiversity strategy. directive 2012/27/eu on energy efficiency88 and the commission recommendation on accelerating permitting for renewable energy projects and facilitating power purchase agreements89 , both adopted on 18 may 2022 , also provide for the identification of renewables go-to areas. those are specific locations , whether on land or sea , particularly suitable for the installation of plants for the production of energy from renewable sources , other than biomass combustion plants , where the deployment of a specific type of renewable energy is not expected to have significant environmental impacts , in view of the particularities of the selected territory. member states should give priority to artificial and built surfaces , such as rooftops , transport infrastructure areas , parking areas , waste sites , industrial sites , mines , artificial inland water bodies , lakes or reservoirs , and , where appropriate , urban waste water treatment sites , as well as degraded land not usable for agriculture. in the designation of renewables go-to areas , member states should , where possible , coincide these go-to areas with protected areas and consider their national nature restoration plans. member states should coordinate the development of national restoration plans with the designation of the renewables go-to areas. during the preparation of the nature restoration plans , member states should ensure synergies with the already designated renewables go-to areas and ensure that the functioning of the renewables go-to areas , including the permitting procedures applicable in the renewables go-to areas foreseen by directive (eu) 2018/2001 , remain unchanged.


### (74) in line with the commitment in the 8th environment action programme to 2030107 , member states should phase out environmentally harmful subsidies at national level , making the best use of market-based instruments and green budgeting tools , including those required to ensure a socially fair transition , and supporting businesses and other stakeholders in developing standardised natural capital accounting practices. ### deleted


### (75) in order to ensure the necessary adaptation of this regulation , the power to adopt acts in accordance with article 290 tfeu should be delegated to the commission in respect of amending annexes i to vii to adapt the group of habitats , to update the information on the common farmland bird index , as well as to adapt the list of biodiversity indicators for agricultural ecosystems , the list of biodiversity indicators for forest ecosystems and the list of marine species to the latest scientific evidence and the examples of restoration measures. it is of particular importance that the commission carries out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work , including at expert level , and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the interinstitutional agreement of 13 april 2016 on better law-making52. in particular , to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts , the european parliament and the council receive all documents at the same time as member states’ experts , and their experts systematically have access to meetings of commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts. ### deleted


### (77) the commission should carry out an evaluation of this regulation. pursuant to paragraph 22 of the interinstitutional agreement on better law-making , that evaluation should be based on the criteria of efficiency , effectiveness , relevance , coherence and eu value added and should provide the basis for impact assessments of possible further measures. in addition , the commission should assess the need to establish additional restoration targets , based on common methods for assessing the condition of ecosystems not covered by articles 4 and 5 , taking into account the most recent scientific evidence. ### (77) the commission should carry out an evaluation of this regulation. pursuant to paragraph 22 of the interinstitutional agreement on better law-making , that evaluation should be based on the criteria of efficiency , effectiveness , relevance , coherence and eu value added and should provide the basis for impact assessments of possible further measures. in addition , the commission should assess the need to establish amended restoration targets , based on an integrated consideration of economic , social and environmental interests , taking into account the most recent scientific evidence.


### the continuous , long-term and sustained recovery of biodiverse and resilient nature across the union’s land and sea areas through the restoration of ecosystems; ### the continuous , long-term and sustained recovery of biodiverse and resilient nature across the union’s land and sea areas through the restoration of degraded ecosystems;


### achieving the union’s overarching objectives concerning climate change mitigation and climate change adaptation; ### deleted


### achieving the union’s overarching objectives concerning climate change mitigation and climate change adaptation; ### achieving the union’s overarching objectives concerning sustainable development , as well as food and energy security;


### 2. this regulation establishes a framework within which member states shall put in place , without delay , effective and area-based restoration measures which together shall cover , by 2030 , at least 20 % of the union’s land and sea areas and , by 2050 , all ecosystems in need of restoration. ### 2. this regulation establishes a framework within which member states shall put in place , without delay , effective and area-based restoration measures which together shall cover , by 2030 , at least 10 % of the natura 2000 sites in need of restoration.


### 1) ‘ecosystem’ means a dynamic complex of plant , animal , and microorganism communities and their non-living environment , interacting as a functional unit , and includes habitat types , habitats of species and species populations; ### 1) "ecosystem" means the relevant habitat types and habitats of species;


### 3) ‘restoration’ means the process of actively or passively assisting the recovery of an ecosystem towards or to good condition , of a habitat type to the highest level of condition attainable and to its favourable reference area , of a habitat of a species to a sufficient quality and quantity , or of species populations to satisfactory levels , as a means of conserving or enhancing biodiversity and ecosystem resilience; ### 3) ‘restoration’ means the process of actively or passively assisting the recovery of a habitat type to the highest level of condition attainable , of a habitat of a species to a sufficient quality and quantity , or of species populations to satisfactory levels , as a means of conserving or enhancing biodiversity;


### (4) ‘good condition’ means a state where the key characteristics of an ecosystem , namely its physical , chemical , compositional , structural and functional state , and its landscape and seascape characteristics , reflect the high level of ecological integrity , stability and resilience necessary to ensure its long-term maintenance; ### (4) ‘good condition’ means favourable conservation status as defined in article 1(e) of directive 92/43/eec;


### (5) ‘favourable reference area’ means the total area of a habitat type in a given biogeographical region or marine region at national level that is considered the minimum necessary to ensure the long-term viability of the habitat type and its species , and all its significant ecological variations in its natural range , and which is composed of the area of the habitat type and , if that area is not sufficient , the area necessary for the re-establishment of the habitat type; ### (5) ‘favourable reference area’ means the total area of a habitat type in a given biogeographical region or marine region that is considered the minimum necessary to ensure the long-term viability of the habitat type and its species , and which is composed of the area of the habitat type;


### 1. member states shall put in place the restoration measures that are necessary to improve to good condition areas of habitat types listed in annex i which are not in good condition. such measures shall be in place on at least 30 % of the area of each group of habitat types listed in annex i that is not in good condition , as quantified in the national restoration plan referred to in article 12 , by 2030 , on at least 60 % by 2040 , and on at least 90 % by 2050. ### 1. member states shall put in place in natura 2000 sites the restoration measures that are necessary to improve to good condition areas of habitat types listed in annex i which are not in a favourable conservation status. such measures shall be in place on at least 10 % of the area of each group of habitat types listed in annex i that is not in good condition , as quantified in the national restoration plan referred to in article 12 , by 2030.


### 2. member states shall put in place the restoration measures that are necessary to re-establish the habitat types listed in annex i in areas not covered by those habitat types. such measures shall be in place on areas representing at least 30 % of the additional overall surface needed to reach the total favourable reference area of each group of habitat types listed in annex i , as quantified in the national restoration plan referred to in article 12 , by 2030 , at least 60 % of that surface by 2040 , and 100 % of that surface by 2050. ### deleted


### 3. member states shall put in place the restoration measures for the terrestrial , coastal and freshwater habitats of the species listed in annexes ii , iv and v to directive 92/43/eec and of the terrestrial , coastal and freshwater habitats of wild birds covered by directive 2009/147/ec that are necessary to improve the quality and quantity of those habitats , including by re-establishing them , and to enhance connectivity , until sufficient quality and quantity of those habitats is achieved. ### 3. member states shall put in place in natura 2000 sites the restoration measures for the terrestrial , coastal and freshwater habitats of the species listed in annexes ii and iv to directive 92/43/eec and of the terrestrial , coastal and freshwater habitats of wild birds covered by directive 2009/147/ec that are necessary to improve the quality and quantity of those habitats , including by re-establishing them , and to enhance connectivity , until sufficient quality and quantity of those habitats is achieved.


### 4. the determination of the most suitable areas for restoration measures in accordance with paragraphs 1 , 2 and 3 of this article shall be based on the best available knowledge and the latest scientific evidence of the condition of the habitat types listed in annex i , measured by the structure and functions which are necessary for their long-term maintenance including their typical species , as referred to in article 1(e) of directive 92/43/eec , and of the quality and quantity of the habitats of the species referred to in paragraph 3 of this article. areas where the habitat types listed in annex i are in unknown condition shall be considered as not being in good condition. ### 4. the determination of the most suitable areas for restoration measures in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 3 of this article shall be based on the best available knowledge and the latest scientific evidence of the condition of the habitat types listed in annex i , measured by the structure and functions which are necessary for their long-term maintenance including their typical species , as referred to in article 1(e) of directive 92/43/eec , and of the quality and quantity of the habitats of the species referred to in paragraph 3 of this article. in identifying the most suitable areas , the socio-economic functions of these areas and of the activities in these areas are taken into account.


### 5. the restoration measures referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall consider the need for improved connectivity between the habitat types listed in annex i and take into account the ecological requirements of the species referred to in paragraph 3 that occur in those habitat types. ### 5. the restoration measures referred to in paragraph 1 shall consider the need for improved connectivity between the habitat types listed in annex i and take into account the ecological requirements of the species referred to in paragraph 3 that occur in those habitat types.


### 6. member states shall ensure that the areas that are subject to restoration measures in accordance with paragraphs 1 , 2 and 3 show a continuous improvement in the condition of the habitat types listed in annex i until good condition is reached , and a continuous improvement of the quality of the habitats of the species referred to in paragraph 3 , until the sufficient quality of those habitats is reached. member states shall ensure that areas in which good condition has been reached and in which the sufficient quality of the habitats of the species has been reached do not deteriorate. ### 6. member states shall ensure that the areas that are subject to restoration measures in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 3 show an improvement in the condition of the habitat types listed in annex i until good condition is reached , and an improvement of the quality of the habitats of the species referred to in paragraph 3 , until the sufficient quality of those habitats is reached.


### 7. member states shall ensure that areas where the habitat types listed in annex i occur do not deteriorate. ### deleted


### 8. outside natura 2000 sites , the non-fulfilment of the obligations set out in paragraphs 6 and 7 is justified if it is caused by: ### deleted


### 9. for natura 2000 sites , the non-fulfilment of the obligations set out in paragraphs 6 and 7 , is justified if it is caused by: ### 9. for natura 2000 sites , the non-fulfilment of the obligations set out in paragraph 6 is justified if it is caused by:


### unavoidable habitat transformations which are directly caused by climate change; or ### unavoidable habitat transformations which are caused by climate change;


### a plan or project authorised in accordance with article 6(4) of the directive 92/43/eec. ### a plan or project authorised in accordance with article 6(3) and (4) of the directive 92/43/eec. or


### 1. member states shall put in place the restoration measures that are necessary to improve to good condition areas of habitat types listed in annex ii which are not in good condition. such measures shall be in place on at least 30 % of the area of each group of habitat types listed in annex ii that is not in good condition , as quantified in the national restoration plan referred to in article 12 , by 2030 , on at least 60 % by 2040 , and on at least 90 % by 2050. ### 1. member states shall put in place in natura 2000 sites the restoration measures that are necessary to improve to good condition areas of habitat types listed in annex ii which are not in a favourable conservation status. such measures shall be in place on at least 10 % of the area of each group of habitat types listed in annex ii that is not in good condition , as quantified in the national restoration plan referred to in article 12 , by 2030.


### 2. member states shall put in place the restoration measures that are necessary to re-establish the habitat types listed in annex ii in areas not covered by those habitat types. such measures shall be in place on areas representing at least 30 % of the additional overall surface needed to reach the total favourable reference area of each group of habitat types listed in annex i , as quantified in the national restoration plan referred to in article 12 , by 2030 , at least 60 % of that surface by 2040 , and 100 % of that surface by 2050. ### deleted


### 3. member states shall put in place the restoration measures for the marine habitats of species listed in annex iii and in annexes ii , iv and v to directive 92/43/eec and for the marine habitats of wild birds covered under directive 2009/147/ec , that are necessary in order to improve the quality and quantity of those habitats , including by re-establishing them , and to enhance connectivity , until sufficient quality and quantity of those habitats is achieved. ### 3. member states shall put in place in natura 2000 sites the restoration measures for the marine habitats of species listed in annex ii and in annex iv to directive 92/43/eec and for the marine habitats of wild birds covered under directive 2009/147/ec , that are necessary in order to improve the quality and quantity of those habitats , including by re-establishing them , and to enhance connectivity , until sufficient quality and quantity of those habitats is achieved.


### 4. the determination of the most suitable areas for restoration measures in accordance with paragraphs 1 , 2 and 3 shall be based on the best available knowledge and the latest scientific evidence of the condition of the habitat types listed in annex ii , measured by the structure and functions which are necessary for their long-term maintenance , including their typical species , referred to in article 1(e) of directive 92/43/eec , and of the quality and quantity of the habitats of the species referred to in paragraph 3. areas where the habitat types listed in annex ii are in unknown condition shall be considered as not being in good condition. ### 4. the determination of the most suitable areas for restoration measures in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 3 shall be based on the best available knowledge and the latest scientific evidence of the condition of the habitat types listed in annex ii , measured by the structure and functions which are necessary for their long-term maintenance , including their typical species , referred to in article 1(e) of directive 92/43/eec , and of the quality and quantity of the habitats of the species referred to in paragraph 3. in identifying the most suitable areas , the socio-economic functions of these areas and of the activities in these areas are taken into account.


### 5. the restoration measures referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall consider the need for improved connectivity between the habitat types listed in annex ii and take into account the ecological requirements of the species referred to in paragraph 3 that occur in those habitat types. ### 5. the restoration measures referred to in paragraph 1 shall consider the need for improved connectivity between the habitat types listed in annex ii and take into account the ecological requirements of the species referred to in paragraph 3 that occur in those habitat types.


### 6. member states shall ensure that the areas that are subject to restoration measures in accordance with paragraphs 1 , 2 and 3 show a continuous improvement in the condition of the habitat types listed in annex ii until good condition is reached , and a continuous improvement of the quality of the habitats of the species referred to in paragraph 3 , until the sufficient quality of those habitats is reached. member states shall ensure that areas in which good condition has been reached and in which the sufficient quality of the habitats of the species has been reached do not deteriorate. ### 6. member states shall ensure that the areas that are subject to restoration measures in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 3 show an improvement in the condition of the habitat types listed in annex ii until good condition is reached , and an improvement of the quality of the habitats of the species referred to in paragraph 3 until the sufficient quality of those habitats is reached.


### (56) the new eu forest strategy for 203081 outlined the need to restore forest biodiversity. forests and other wooded land cover over 43 ,5 % of the eu’s land space. forest ecosystems that host rich biodiversity are vulnerable to climate change but are also a natural ally in adapting to and fighting climate change and climate-related risks , including through their carbon-stock and carbon-sink functions , and provide many other vital ecosystem services and benefits , such as the provision of timber and wood , food and other non-wood products , climate regulation , soil stabilisation and erosion control and the purification of air and water. ### (56) the new eu forest strategy for 203081 outlined the need to restore forest biodiversity. forests and other wooded land cover over 43 ,5 % of the eu’s land space. forest ecosystems that host rich biodiversity are vulnerable to climate change but are also a natural ally in adapting to and fighting climate change and climate-related risks , including through their carbon-stock and carbon-sink functions , and provide many other vital ecosystem services and benefits , such as the provision of timber and wood , biomass , peat , game meat and other food , medical , textile substitutes and other products , climate regulation , soil stabilisation and erosion control and the purification of air and water.


### (57) restoration measures need to be put in place to enhance the biodiversity of forest ecosystems across the union , including in the areas not covered by habitat types falling within the scope of directive 92/43/eec. in the absence of a common method for assessing the condition of forest ecosystems that would allow for the setting of specific restoration targets for forest ecosystems , it is appropriate to set a general obligation to improve biodiversity in forest ecosystems and measure the fulfilment of that obligation on the basis of existing indicators , such as standing and lying deadwood , the share of forests with uneven-aged structure , forest connectivity , the common forest bird index82 , and the stock of organic carbon. ### (57) restoration measures need to be put in place to enhance the biodiversity of forest ecosystems across the union. in the absence of a common method for assessing the condition of forest ecosystems that would allow for the setting of specific restoration targets for forest ecosystems , it is appropriate to set a general obligation to improve biodiversity in forest ecosystems.


### 2. member states shall remove the barriers to longitudinal and lateral connectivity of surface waters identified under paragraph 1 of this article , in accordance with the plan for their removal referred to in article 12(2) , point (f). when removing barriers , member states shall primarily address obsolete barriers , which are those that are no longer needed for renewable energy generation , inland navigation , water supply or other uses. ### 2. member states may remove the barriers to longitudinal and lateral connectivity of surface waters identified under paragraph 1 of this article , in accordance with the plan for their removal referred to in article 12(2) , point (f). when removing barriers , member states shall address obsolete barriers , which are those that are no longer needed for renewable energy generation , inland navigation , water supply , flood protection or other uses.


### 1. member states shall reverse the decline of pollinator populations by 2030 and achieve thereafter an increasing trend of pollinator populations , measured every three years after 2030 , until satisfactory levels are achieved , as set out in accordance with article 11(3). ### 1. member states shall put in place appropriate support measures for promoting pollinators in agricultural ecosystems , in addition to the areas that are subject to restoration measures under article 4(1) and (3) , taking into account impacts on agricultural production and factors such as climate change.


### the date of catches for fishery products or date of harvest for aquaculture products , and the date of production where applicable; ### the date of catches for fishery products or date of harvest for aquaculture products , or the date of production where applicable;


### (1) the common fisheries policy has been reformed by regulation (eu) no 1380/2013 of the european parliament and council28. the objectives of the common fisheries policy and the requirements for fisheries control and enforcement are set out in articles 2 and 36 of that regulation. its successful implementation depends on the effective and up-to-date control and enforcement system. ### (1) the common fisheries policy has been reformed by regulation (eu) no 1380/2013 of the european parliament and council28. the objectives of the common fisheries policy and the requirements for fisheries control and enforcement are set out in articles 2 and 36 of that regulation. its successful implementation depends on the straightforward , effective and up-to-date control and enforcement system.


### (10) a definition of 'fishing vessel' is provided in regulation (eu) no 1380/2013 and includes vessels equipped for commercial exploitation of marine biological resources such as catching vessels , support vessels , fish processing vessels , vessels engaged in transhipment and carrier vessels equipped for the transportation of fisheries products , with the exception of container vessels. the definition 'fishing vessel' in regulation (ec) no 1224/2009 should therefore be deleted. ### (10) a definition of 'fishing vessel' is provided in regulation (eu) no 1380/2013 and includes vessels equipped for commercial exploitation of marine biological resources. the definition 'fishing vessel' in regulation (ec) no 1224/2009 should therefore be deleted.


### (12) small scale fisheries play an important role in the union , from a biological , economic and social perspective. considering the possible impacts of small scale fisheries on stocks , it is important to control that fishing activities and fishing efforts of smaller vessels are in compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy. for this purpose it is necessary to obtain position data of those vessels. therefore , member states should be able to track all fishing vessels , including fishing vessels which are less than 12 metres' length. for vessels 12 metres' length it is now possible to use mobile devices which are less expensive and easy to use. ### (12) small scale fisheries play an important role in the union , from a biological , economic and social perspective. for small fishing vessels of less than 12 metres’ length overall an obligation to keep a fishing logbook or to complete a landing declaration would constitute a disproportionate burden in relation to their fishing capacity.


### (3) the declining condition of eastern baltic cod (gadus morhua) has been linked to that situation. according to ices , the stock suffers from an unsustainably low biomass due to a combination of declining recruitment , environmental factors and changes in the ecosystem leading to a high natural mortality (about three times the fishing mortality) , and an excessive fishing mortality given the status of the stock. the biomass of commercial sized cod is presently at the lowest level observed since the 1950s. moreover , ices estimates that the spawning stock biomass will remain below the sustainability reference point in the medium-term (2024) even with no fishing at all. in its stock advice for 2020 ices therefore advises zero catches. ### (3) the declining condition of eastern baltic cod (gadus morhua) has been linked to that situation. according to ices , the stock suffers from an unsustainably low biomass due to a combination of declining recruitment , environmental factors and changes in the ecosystem (oxygen depletion , increased temperatures , pollution , etc.) leading to a high natural mortality (about three times the fishing mortality) , and an excessive fishing mortality given the status of the stock. the biomass of commercial sized cod is presently at the lowest level observed since the 1950s. moreover , ices estimates that the spawning stock biomass will remain below the sustainability reference point in the medium-term (2024) even with no fishing at all. in its stock advice for 2020 ices therefore advises zero catches.


### (14) ices issued an analytical assessment of eastern baltic cod but was not in a position to provide fishing mortality ranges and various reference points because of a lack of required data. therefore , data collection is to be improved by ensuring that the observer coverage at sea of vessels catching eastern baltic cod is at least 20 %. ### (14) ices issued an analytical assessment of eastern baltic cod but was not in a position to provide fishing mortality ranges and various reference points because of a lack of required data. therefore , data collection is to be improved.


### (16) in order to mitigate the adverse economic effects caused by the exceptional and persistent environmental situation in the baltic sea and the resulting severe reductions in fishing opportunities and in view of the specific measures provided for in the multiannual plan for the baltic sea , public support for the permanent cessation of fishing activities through the scrapping of fishing vessels should be available to allow member states to meet the objectives of their action plans under article 22 of regulation (eu) no 1380/2013 and reduce any identified structural imbalance in the fishing segments covered by the baltic multiannual plan. regulation (eu) no 508/2014 should therefore be amended accordingly to reintroduce support for permanent cessation for the vessels that have significant dependence on eastern baltic cod. ### (16) in order to mitigate the seriously harmful socio-economic consequences for coastal communities and businesses engaged in fishing caused by the exceptional and persistent environmental situation in the baltic sea and the resulting severe reductions in fishing opportunities and in view of the specific measures provided for in the multiannual plan for the baltic sea , public support for the permanent cessation of fishing activities through the scrapping of fishing vessels should be available to allow member states to meet the objectives of their action plans under article 22 of regulation (eu) no 1380/2013 and reduce any identified structural imbalance in the fishing segments covered by the baltic multiannual plan. regulation (eu) no 508/2014 should therefore be amended accordingly to reintroduce support for permanent cessation for the vessels that have significant dependence on eastern baltic cod.


### i. whereas there is a strong scientific consensus that mpas are beneficial to fisheries because of their spillover effect and their positive effects on recruitment; ### i. whereas there is a strong scientific consensus that mpas can be beneficial to fisheries because of their spillover effect and their positive effects on recruitment;


### 4. calls on the commission to continue to support plans to improve selectivity and to take into account the results of studies showing the detrimental impacts of fishing techniques such as bottom-contacting gear or fish aggregating devices (fads) by strongly limiting their use; ### 4. calls on the commission to continue to support plans to improve selectivity and to take into account the results of studies showing the impacts of fishing techniques such as bottom-contacting gear or fish aggregating devices (fads);


### 5. considers that the eu should go beyond current fisheries management practices and promote a transition towards low-impact fisheries in order to rebuild fish stocks and restore marine ecosystems; ### 5. considers that the eu should promote a transition towards low-impact fisheries in order to rebuild fish stocks and restore marine ecosystems;


### 6. considers that msy should not be the only indicator relating to eu fisheries management and that maximum economic yield (mey) should also be used; ### 6. considers that msy should be the only indicator relating to eu fisheries management;


### 7. considers that the role of the agency in promoting the creation of the european border and coast guard should in no way undermine the agency’s core activity as the union body responsible for organising operational coordination of fisheries control activities; therefore stresses the need to provide the agency with adequate financial and human resources commensurate with its growing tasks; ### 7. considers that the role of the agency in promoting the creation of the european border and coast guard should in no way undermine the agency’s core activity as the union body responsible for organising operational coordination of fisheries control activities , as this could lead to the weakening of fisheries surveillance and an increase in illegal , unreported and unregulated fishing; therefore stresses the need to provide the agency with adequate financial and human resources commensurate with its growing tasks;


### 1. grants the executive director of the european fisheries control agency discharge in respect of the implementation of the agency’s budget for the financial year 2018 / postpones its decision on granting the director of the european fisheries control agency discharge in respect of the implementation of the agency’s budget for the financial year 2018; ### 1. grants the executive director of the european fisheries control agency discharge in respect of the implementation of the agency’s budget for the financial year 2018;


### f. whereas , to date , there is no legislation at european level governing the implementation of co-management mechanisms , even if in many of its member states this system is being used to manage some of their fisheries , applying rules that fit in perfectly with the current common fisheries policy; ### f. whereas , to date , there are few instruments at european level facilitating the implementation of co-management mechanisms , even if in many of its member states this system is being used to manage some of their fisheries , applying rules that fit in perfectly with the current common fisheries policy;


### g. whereas traditional management has not had the desired effects on improving stocks and maintaining employment; ### g. whereas traditional management in some cases has not had the desired effects on improving stocks and maintaining employment;


### i. whereas it is difficult to obtain and collect data and information on marine environments and fisheries , and whereas the participation of the fisheries sector itself in this work is important for all public and private research bodies at european level , as laid down in article 25 of the common fisheries policy in regulation (eu) no 1380/2013; ### i. whereas it is difficult to obtain , collect and share data and information on marine environments and fisheries , and whereas the participation of the fisheries sector itself in this work , through the direct involvement of those engaged in this activity , is important for all public and private research bodies at european level , as laid down in article 25 of regulation (eu) no 1380/2013 on the common fisheries policy;


### 8. stresses that the lack of specific community legislation for the implementation of fisheries co-management systems hinders their use in the management of fisheries in the member states , as this depends solely and exclusively on the specific commitment of the competent authorities; ### 8. stresses that the lack of specific eu instruments for the implementation of fisheries co-management systems could in some cases hinder their use in the management of fisheries in the member states , as this depends solely and exclusively on the specific commitment of the competent authorities;


### 9. stresses that this lack of community legislation makes it difficult to implement models legally , despite the interest that the sector and administrations may show in applying them in a given area , and that opportunities are missed to implement co-management projects in more areas; ### 9. stresses that any eu instruments should be aimed at facilitating the implementation of co-management models , to meet the interest that the sector and administrations may show in applying them in a given area;


### 10. asks the commission for a regulatory framework on fisheries co-management , which is directly applicable in the member states; ### 10. asks the commission to assess how fisheries co-management can be better facilitated , taking into account the principle of subsidiarity;


### 11. stresses that there is , moreover , a need in the current co-management systems for concrete legislative measures to pave the way for the setting up of co-management committees and to speed up the process of implementing measures , as the legislative framework is currently unclear in most regions , which means that the requisite timeframe for their creation and implementation is in the long term , whereas solutions are needed in the short to medium term; ### 11. stresses that there could be , moreover , a need in the current co-management systems for concrete measures to pave the way for the setting up of co-management committees and to speed up the process of implementing measures , as the legislative framework is currently unclear in most regions , which means that the requisite timeframe for their creation and implementation is in the long term , whereas solutions are needed in the short to medium term;


### 12. points out that , in the absence of a clear legal framework , successful co-management of fisheries projects is difficult as it involves medium- and long-term processes and a committed leadership , which is why european support for this system is essential; ### 12. points out that successful co-management of fisheries projects requires medium- and long-term processes and a committed leadership , which is why european support for this system is essential;


### 17. stresses that the choice of instrument used in the management of fisheries resources is largely up to governments , although experience around the world shows that various forms of partnership between government , industry and fishers strengthen management and produce good results; points out that the 1987 report ‘our common future’ , commonly known as the brundtland report , already concluded that in order to achieve sustainable development and therefore also sustainable management of natural resources , communities should have greater access to and control over decisions affecting their resources , always in cooperation with the relevant administrations and organisations (world commission on environment and development , 19879); ### 17. stresses that the choice of instrument used in the management of fisheries resources is largely up to governments , although experience around the world shows that various forms of partnership between government , industry and fishers strengthen management and bring social and economic benefits to the areas concerned; points out that the 1987 report ‘our common future’ , commonly known as the brundtland report , already concluded that in order to achieve sustainable development and therefore also sustainable management of natural resources , communities should have greater access to and control over decisions affecting their resources , always in cooperation with the relevant administrations and organisations (world commission on environment and development , 1987)9;


### 19. emphasises that , with regard to the european union , co-management – and similar concepts such as co-governance or participatory management – has been briefly described in the preamble to various regulations at european level , but it has not been properly developed in their articles , nor has it generated sufficient debate to promote specific legislation for this fisheries management system , which has proved its worth in different regions and in different cases; ### 19. emphasises that , with regard to the european union , co-management – and similar concepts such as co-governance or participatory management – has been briefly described in the preamble to various regulations at european level , but it has not been developed in their articles; welcomes a debate to promote this fisheries management system , which has proved its worth in different regions and in different cases;


### a. whereas the common fisheries policy states that aquaculture should contribute to the preservation of food production potential on a sustainable basis throughout the union so as to guarantee long-term food security , including food supplies , growth and employment for union citizens , and contribute to meeting the growing world demand for aquatic food; ### a. whereas the common fisheries policy states that aquaculture should contribute to the preservation of food production potential on a sustainable basis throughout the union so as to guarantee long-term food security , including food supplies , growth and employment for union citizens , and contribute to meeting the growing world demand for aquatic food; whereas it is crucial to reduce the administrative burden and implement union law in a more efficient manner that is more responsive to the needs of stakeholders;


### (2) therefore , it should be possible for the european maritime and fisheries fund (emff) established by regulation (eu) no 508/2014 of the european parliament and of the council3 to support specific measures to mitigate the effects of the market disruption caused by the military aggression of russia against ukraine on the supply chain of fishery and aquaculture products. those measures should comprise financial compensation to recognised producer organisations and associations of producer organisations which store fishery or aquaculture in accordance with articles 30 and 31 of regulation (eu) no 1379/2013 of the european parliament and of the council4 , and financial compensation to operators of the fishery and aquaculture sector for their income forgone , and for additional costs they incurred due to the market disruption caused by the military aggression of russia against ukraine and its effects on the supply chain of fishery and aquaculture products. expenditure for operations supported under those measures should be eligible as of 24 february 2022 , which is the date of the start of the military aggression of russia against ukraine. ### (2) therefore , it should be possible for the european maritime and fisheries fund (emff) established by regulation (eu) no 508/2014 of the european parliament and of the council3 to support specific measures to mitigate the effects of the market disruption caused by the military aggression of russia against ukraine on the supply chain of fishery and aquaculture products. those measures should comprise financial compensation to recognised producer organisations and associations of producer organisations which store fishery or aquaculture in accordance with articles 30 and 31 of regulation (eu) no 1379/2013 of the european parliament and of the council4 , and financial compensation to operators of the fishery and aquaculture sector , including the processing sector and the whole supply chain , for their income forgone , and for additional costs they incurred due to the market disruption caused by the military aggression of russia against ukraine and its effects on the supply chain of fishery and aquaculture products. expenditure for operations supported under those measures will be eligible as of 24 february 2022 , which is the date of the start of the military aggression of russia against ukraine.


### (3) it should also be possible for the emff to support financial compensation for the temporary cessation of fishing activities where the military aggression of russia against ukraine jeopardises the security of fishing activities. such temporary cessation should occur as of 24 february 2022 , which is the date of the start of the military aggression of russia against ukraine. ### (3) it should also be possible for the emff to support financial compensation for the temporary cessation of fishing activities where the military aggression of russia against ukraine jeopardises the security of fishing activities and in the event that the consequences have an economic impact that does not allow the normal performance of fisheries activities for the operators and the entire supply chain. such temporary cessation should occur as of 24 february 2022 , which is the date of the start of the military aggression of russia against ukraine.


### (4) given the significant socio-economic consequences of the market disruption caused by the military aggression of russia against ukraine on the supply chain of fishery and aquaculture products , it should be possible to support the temporary cessation of fishing activities caused by the military aggression of russia against ukraine with a maximum co-financing rate of 75 % of eligible public expenditure. ### (4) given the significant socio-economic consequences of the market disruption caused by the military aggression of russia against ukraine on the supply chain of fishery and aquaculture products , it should be possible to support the temporary cessation of fishing activities caused by the military aggression of russia against ukraine with a rate of 100 % of eligible public expenditure.


### where the temporary cessation of fishing activities occurs between 1 february and 31 december 2020 as a consequence of the covid-19 outbreak , including for vessels operating under a sustainable fisheries partnership agreement , or occurs as of 24 february 2022 as a consequence of the military aggression of russia against ukraine that jeopardises the security of fishing activities. ### where the temporary cessation of fishing activities occurs between 1 february and 31 december 2020 as a consequence of the covid-19 outbreak , including for vessels operating under a sustainable fisheries partnership agreement , or occurs as of 24 february 2022 as a consequence of the military aggression of russia against ukraine that jeopardises the security of fishing activities and in the event that the consequences have an economic impact that does not allow the normal performance of fisheries activities for the operators and the entire supply chain.


### in accordance with the second subparagraph of article 65(9) of regulation (eu) no 1303/2013 and by way of derogation from the first subparagraph thereof , expenditure for operations supported under point (d) of the first subparagraph of this paragraph shall be eligible as of 1 february 2020 if they are the consequence of the covid-19 outbreak , or as of 24 february 2022 if they are the consequence of the military aggression of russia against ukraine that jeopardises the security of fishing activities. ### in accordance with the second subparagraph of article 65(9) of regulation (eu) no 1303/2013 and by way of derogation from the first subparagraph thereof , expenditure for operations supported under point (d) of the first subparagraph of this paragraph shall be eligible as of 1 february 2020 if they are the consequence of the covid-19 outbreak , or as of 24 february 2022 if they are the consequence of the military aggression of russia against ukraine that jeopardises the security of fishing activities and in the event that the consequences have an economic impact that does not allow the normal performance of fisheries activities for the operators and the entire supply chain.


### 4a. the emff may support measures for temporary cessation of fishing activities caused by the covid-19 outbreak or by the military aggression of russia against ukraine that jeopardises the security of fishing activities , as provided for in point (d) of article 33(1) , under the conditions laid down in article 33. ### 4a. the emff may support measures for temporary cessation of fishing activities caused by the covid-19 outbreak or by the military aggression of russia against ukraine that jeopardises the security of fishing activities and in the event that the consequences have an economic impact that does not allow the normal performance of fisheries activities for the operators and the entire supply chain , as provided for in point (d) of article 33(1) , under the conditions laid down in article 33.


### 4. acknowledges that the financial year 2020 was dominated by the covid-19 pandemic; notes that this crisis has had a strong impact on the implementation rate of the agency’s work programmed , which dropped from 99 % in 2019 to 90 % in 2020; notes , however , that in spite of the circumstances the agency managed to implement its budget at a rate of 97 ,3 % for commitments and 81 ,2 % for payments; ### 4. acknowledges that the financial year 2020 was dominated by the covid-19 pandemic; notes that this crisis has had a strong impact on the implementation rate of the agency’s work programmed , which dropped from 99 % in 2019 to 90 % in 2020; questions the need , in spite of the reduced workload , for the agency to implement its budget at a rate of 97 ,3 % for commitments and 81 ,2 % for payments;


### 5. recalls the importance of fisheries control in achieving the objectives of the common fisheries policy (cfp); acknowledges the agency’s vital contribution to implementing these goals; stresses that the revision of the regulation governing fisheries control will strongly increase the agency’s workload; emphasises the incoherence of seeking to tackle growing obligations without sufficient resources to do so; stresses , therefore , that the financial and human resources available to the agency need to be increased in the coming years; ### 5. recalls the importance of fisheries control in achieving the objectives of the common fisheries policy (cfp); acknowledges the agency’s vital contribution to implementing these goals; stresses that it is the member states that are primarily responsible for the control of fishing activities , while the agency’s tasks are supportive in nature; stresses that the revision of the regulation governing fisheries control will increase the agency’s supportive workload; emphasises the incoherence of seeking to tackle growing obligations without sufficient resources to do so; stresses , therefore , that the financial and human resources available to the agency need to be sufficient in the coming years;


### 8. highlights the assistance provided by the agency to the commission with regard to cooperation with third countries and the agency's crucial role in securing a level playing field with all coastal states; stresses , in that regard , the need to increase the resources allocated to the agency with a view to making it possible to handle the increased workload caused by the withdrawal of the united kingdom from the union and any potential consequences of the new relationship for the fisheries control framework; ### 8. highlights the assistance provided by the agency to the commission with regard to cooperation with third countries and the agency's crucial role in securing a level playing field with all coastal states; calls for the necessary steps to be taken to make it possible to handle any potential consequences of the new relationship with the united kingdom for the fisheries control framework;


### 10. takes note of the agency’s policy of promoting equal treatment of staff and of its goal of gender equality in terms both of numbers and of grades and responsibility levels;; strongly deplores the fact that women account for only 30 % of staff employed at grade ad 8 or higher; welcomes the recent nomination of susan steele as the new executive director of the agency , notes however that her nomination does not enable parity to be attained at management level , since all heads of unit positions are held by men; calls on the agency to keep up its efforts with regard to its gender parity policy; ### 10. takes note of the agency’s policy of promoting equal treatment of staff and of its goal of gender equality in terms both of numbers and of grades and responsibility levels;; strongly deplores the fact that women account for only 30 % of staff employed at grade ad 8 or higher; welcomes the recent nomination of susan steele as the new executive director of the agency , notes however that her nomination does not enable parity to be attained at management level , since all heads of unit positions are held by men;


### a. whereas the eu is aiming to become climate neutral by 2050; whereas offshore renewable energy should play a key role in achieving this objective; ### a. whereas the eu is aiming to become climate neutral by 2050; whereas offshore renewable energy is one of the options that member states can choose to achieve this target;


### b. whereas according to the commission’s estimates , 30 % of the eu’s electricity demand in 2050 will be met by offshore wind , corresponding to an increase from the current 12 gw offshore wind capacity in the eu-27 to a target of 300 gw in 2050; ### b. whereas an increase in offshore wind energy is not essential to reach the goal of climate neutrality by 2050 , as there are other viable low-carbon options such as nuclear energy;


### e. whereas offshore wind turbines have an average life cycle of 25 to 30 years; whereas very few turbines have so far been decommissioned; ### e. whereas offshore wind turbines have an average life cycle of 25 to 30 years; whereas very few turbines have so far been decommissioned and recycling is still very complex with only 85-90% of a dismantled wind turbine recycled;


### 2. stresses that the large-scale roll-out of offshore wind farms (owfs) risks harming the physical functioning of the sea basin , in particular sea and air currents , which might contribute to a mixing of the stratified water column and consequently influence the nutrient cycle , wave generation , tidal amplitudes and bedload sediment transport , while infrasonic noise from rotating blades could chase fish away from owfs , and electromagnetic fields from underwater cables , as well as underwater noise from pile driving , could have severe negative impacts on marine life; ### 2. stresses that the large-scale roll-out of offshore wind farms (owfs) risks harming the physical functioning of the sea basin , in particular sea and air currents , which might contribute to a mixing of the stratified water column and consequently influence the nutrient cycle , wave generation , tidal amplitudes and bedload sediment transport , while infrasonic noise from rotating blades could chase fish , marine mammal species and crustaceans away from owfs , and electromagnetic fields from underwater cables , as well as underwater noise from pile driving , could have severe negative impacts on marine life;


### 5. states that owfs can have an impact on fisheries by changing the spatial distribution and abundance of commercially fished marine species as well as through their closure for safety reasons or the imposition of a change in fishing activity or method , for example from active to passive; ### 5. states that owfs have an impact on fisheries by changing the spatial distribution and abundance of commercially fished marine species as well as through their closure for safety reasons or the imposition of a change in fishing activity or method , for example from active to passive;


### 7. stresses that insurance for fishing vessels operating in wind farms is very problematic owing to the insufficient indemnity levels offered by fishing vessels’ insurance policies; ### 7. stresses that insurance for fishing vessels operating in or sailing through wind farms is very problematic owing to the insufficient indemnity levels offered by fishing vessels’ insurance policies;


### 8. points out that any restriction on access to traditional fishing grounds directly affects the livelihoods of eu fishers and dependent jobs ashore , and that it undermines the responsible and sustainable provision of food security; ### 8. points out that any restriction on access to traditional fishing grounds directly affects the livelihoods of eu fishers and dependent jobs ashore , and that it undermines the responsible and sustainable provision of food security; points out , therefore , that it is wise to choose energy sources that require as little space as possible;


### 12. stresses that the decommissioning of offshore wind turbines must neither generate enduring environmental impacts nor pose safety risks to fishing vessels due to any remaining sub-seabed infrastructure; ### 12. stresses that the decommissioning of offshore wind turbines must neither generate enduring environmental impacts nor pose safety risks to fishing vessels due to any remaining sub-seabed infrastructure; considers it essential to ensure an integrated approach to the life cycle processes of offshore windfarms and that decommissioning strategies envisaging alternative future use or removal of the constructions must be integrated into design and installation plans from the beginning and long-term sustainable impact must be considered to adhere to the principles of a circular economy;


### 13. highlights that assessments of the economic and socio-cultural effects of offshore renewables on fisheries are lacking in recent empirical studies; urges the commission , therefore , to carry out further research looking beyond environmental impacts in order to assess the possible negative economic and social impacts on fisheries of investments in owfs; ### 13. highlights that assessments of the economic , socio-economic and socio-cultural effects of offshore renewables on fisheries are lacking in recent empirical studies; urges the commission , therefore , to carry out further research looking beyond environmental impacts in order to assess the possible negative economic and social impacts on fisheries of investments in owfs;


### 16. states that maritime spatial planning must play a key role and has to put greater emphasis on the assessment of achieving co-location options , which is of the utmost importance in achieving a win-win situation for both sustainable fisheries and the offshore energy sector; ### 16. states that maritime spatial planning must play a key role and has to put greater emphasis on the assessment of achieving co-location options and shared usage of wind farms , which is of the utmost importance in achieving a win-win situation for both sustainable fisheries and aquaculture and the offshore energy sector;


### 17. stresses that owfs should only be built if the exclusion of negative environmental and ecological , as well as economic and socio-cultural impacts is guaranteed , in line with the objectives of the blue economy and the european green deal; ### 17. stresses that owfs should only be built if the exclusion of negative environmental and ecological , as well as economic , socio-economic and socio-cultural impacts is guaranteed , in line with the objectives of the blue economy and the european green deal;


### 19. stresses that early stakeholder consultation and participation , the creation of transparent guidelines and the payment of compensation could alleviate the potential for conflict and create a level playing field between fisheries and offshore renewables; ### 19. stresses that early and continuous stakeholder consultation and participation , the creation of transparent guidelines and the payment of compensation could alleviate the potential for conflict and create a level playing field between fisheries and offshore renewables;


### 20. emphasises that the precautionary principle , in accordance with article 191(2) of the treaty on the functioning of the european union , should apply if decisions have to be taken before the required knowledge or information is available; ### 20. emphasises that the precautionary principle , in accordance with article 191(2) of the treaty on the functioning of the european union , should apply if decisions have to be taken before the required knowledge or information is available; calls therefore for a moratorium on the construction of new windfarms in fishing areas;


### 21. notes that further eu legislation might be required in case member states’ maritime spatial planning does not guarantee the fair inclusion of fisheries; ### 21. notes that maritime spatial planning is and remains a competence that belongs to the member states;


### this regulation lays down rules for the sustainable use of plant protection products by providing for the setting , and achievement by 2030 , of reduction targets for the use and risk of chemical plant protection products , establishing requirements for use , storage , sale and disposal of plant protection products and for application equipment , providing for training and awareness raising , and providing for implementation of integrated pest management. ### this directive lays down rules for the sustainable use of plant protection products by establishing requirements for use , storage , sale and disposal of plant protection products and for plant protection products application equipment , providing for training and awareness raising , and providing for implementation of integrated pest management , and providing for member state contributions to the european union reduction targets for the use and risk of synthetic plant protection products by 2030.


### this regulation lays down rules for the sustainable use of plant protection products by providing for the setting , and achievement by 2030 , of reduction targets for the use and risk of chemical plant protection products , establishing requirements for use , storage , sale and disposal of plant protection products and for application equipment , providing for training and awareness raising , and providing for implementation of integrated pest management. ### this regulation lays down rules for the sustainable use of plant protection products by establishing requirements for use , storage , sale and disposal of plant protection products and for plant protection products application equipment , providing for training and awareness raising , providing for implementation of integrated pest management , and providing for the setting , and approaching by 2030 , of european union reduction targets for the use and risk of chemical plant protection products.


### methodology for calculating progress towards achieving the two union and two national 2030 reduction targets ### methodology for calculating progress towards achieving the two union 2030 reduction targets


### national measures for encouraging the use of non-chemical methods by professional users through financial incentives , in accordance with union legislation on state aid; ### national measures for encouraging the use of non-chemical methods by professional users;


### planned and adopted measures to support , or ensure through binding requirements laid down in national law , innovation and the development and use of non-chemical pest control methods; ### planned and adopted measures to support innovation and the development and use of non-chemical pest control methods;


### 3. by way of derogation from paragraph 1 , a competent authority designated by a member state may permit a professional user to use a plant protection product in a sensitive area for a limited period with a precisely defined start and end date that is the shortest possible but does not exceed 60 days , provided that all of the following conditions are met: ### deleted


### a. whereas nature and biodiversity are the foundations of food and , without strong political action to conserve and restore nature and biodiversity , food security and the right to food will be irreversibly endangered; ### a. whereas the protection of nature and biodiversity is important for food security;


### 1. supports the just transition to agro-ecological and organic farming; reiterates its support for the ambitions , targets and goals of the farm to fork , biodiversity and zero-pollution strategies; welcomes their published and announced legislative proposals , including those related to the reduction in the use of pesticides and their associated risks and the setting of eu food waste reduction targets; ### 1. supports the development and promotion of the agro-ecological and organic farming; highlights , however , that all policies towards food security , both on an eu and global scale , must be based on a balanced approach , balancing their economic , environmental and social implications and that the response to the current crisis must not be based solely on increasing environmental ambitions without proper impact assessment provided;


### 1. supports the just transition to agro-ecological and organic farming; reiterates its support for the ambitions , targets and goals of the farm to fork , biodiversity and zero-pollution strategies; welcomes their published and announced legislative proposals , including those related to the reduction in the use of pesticides and their associated risks and the setting of eu food waste reduction targets; ### 1. supports the development and promotion of agro-ecological and biological farming; notes , however , that all food security policies , both at eu level and on a global scale , must be based on a balanced approach , striking a balance between the economic , environmental and social impacts , and that the response to the current crisis must not be based exclusively on scaling up the environmental ambitions without a proper impact assessment;


### 2. calls for the strict application of the one health principle in all policies that affect the availability and accessibility of food; stresses that food safety must never be jeopardised; ### 2. calls for the strict application of the one health principle and rejects any move to introduce insect consumption , on grounds of health protection and , above all , human dignity;


### 3. highlights that the availability of plant proteins , if consumed directly , is more than sufficient to meet global protein needs; acknowledges the positive impact that plant-based diets have on humans , animals , the planet and food security; stresses that reducing the number and density of farmed animals can effectively combat the climate and biodiversity crises , decrease the risk of zoonotic diseases and contribute to food security in the short and long terms; ### deleted


### 3. notes that the european green deal could be a milestone in the eu transition to a greener and more sustainable economy , while pointing out that many of the resulting measures might have adverse effects , which have not yet been properly assessed , on eu farms and food security; calls on the commission to carry out a comprehensive assessment of the cumulative impact of green deal legislative proposals on the eu farming sector; ### 3. notes that the european green deal needs more safeguards in order to guarantee long term food security and viable farms in the eu transition to a greener and more sustainable economy , while pointing out that many of the resulting measures might have adverse effects , which have not yet been properly assessed , on eu farms and food security; calls on the commission to carry out a comprehensive assessment of the cumulative impact of green deal legislative proposals on the eu farming sector;


### 3. notes that the european green deal could be a milestone in the eu transition to a greener and more sustainable economy , while pointing out that many of the resulting measures might have adverse effects , which have not yet been properly assessed , on eu farms and food security; calls on the commission to carry out a comprehensive assessment of the cumulative impact of green deal legislative proposals on the eu farming sector; ### 3. notes that the european green deal could be a milestone in the eu transition to a greener and more sustainable economy , while pointing out that many of the resulting measures might have adverse effects , which have not yet been properly defined or assessed , on eu farms and food security; calls on the commission to carry out a comprehensive assessment of the cumulative impact of green deal legislative proposals on the eu farming sector;


### 4. emphasises that biofuel production negatively affects food security; denounces , moreover , the focus on short-term policy measures for example , on fertilisers; ### deleted


### 6. is concerned that the resumption of ukrainian grain exports mainly benefits western feed and livestock industries instead of alleviating pressures in the global south2; ### 6. is concerned that the resumption of ukrainian grain exports mainly benefits western feed and livestock industries;


### 7. calls for a strategy to regionalise the supply chain of the most important commodities and to ensure the supply of local and sustainable plant proteins; ### 7. calls for a strategy to boost domestic production of the most important commodities and to ensure the supply of high-quality local products;


### 9. considers it irresponsible that the eu continues to support environmentally harmful and cruel practices under the common agricultural policy and common fisheries policy. ### deleted


### 9. considers it irresponsible that the eu continues to support environmentally harmful and cruel practices under the common agricultural policy and common fisheries policy. ### 9. stresses that standards of environmental protection and animal welfare in the eu are among the highest in the world , with harmonised rules covering a range of animal species and welfare issues; believes that the reformed common agricultural policy and common fisheries policy allow for further improvements in this field.


### (13) given the special nature of sohos , resulting from their human origin , and the increasing demands for these substances for human application or for the manufacture of products regulated by other union legislation , or as the starting and raw material thereof , it is necessary to ensure a high level of health protection for donors as well as for recipients. sohos should be obtained from individuals whose health status is such that no detrimental effects will ensue as a result of the donation. this regulation should therefore include principles and technical rules to monitor and protect donors. as different types of donation imply different risks for donors , with varying levels of significance , the monitoring of donor health should be proportionate to those levels of risk. this is particularly important when donation involves some risk to the donor’s health due to a need for pre-treatment with medicinal products , a medical intervention to collect the substance or a need for donors to donate repeatedly. donations of oocytes , bone marrow , peripheral blood stem cells and plasma should be considered to imply a significant risk. ### (13) given the special nature of sohos , resulting from their human origin , and the increasing demands for these substances for human application or for the manufacture of products regulated by other union legislation , or as the starting and raw material thereof , it is necessary to ensure a high level of health protection for donors as well as for recipients. sohos should be obtained from individuals whose health status is such that no detrimental effects will ensue as a result of the donation. this regulation should therefore include principles and technical rules to monitor and protect donors. as different types of donation imply different risks for donors , with varying levels of significance , the monitoring of donor health should be proportionate to those levels of risk.


### (15) this regulation does not prevent member states from maintaining or introducing more stringent protective measures that are compatible with union law. member states should notify the commission of any such measures. more stringent protective measures put in place by member states should be evidence-based and proportionate to the risk to human health , for example based on overall safety concerns and corresponding risks in a member state or specific local risks. they should not discriminate against persons on grounds of sex , racial or ethnic origin , religion or belief , disability , age or sexual orientation , unless that measure or its application is objectively justified by a legitimate aim , and the means of achieving that aim are appropriate and necessary. ### (15) this regulation does not prevent member states from maintaining or introducing more stringent protective measures that are compatible with union law , particularly in the area of conception by means of fertility treatment. member states should notify the commission of any such measures. more stringent protective measures put in place by member states should be evidence-based and proportionate to the risk to human health , for example based on overall safety concerns and corresponding risks in a member state or specific local risks. they should not discriminate against persons on grounds of sex , racial or ethnic origin , religion or belief , disability , age or sexual orientation , unless that measure or its application is objectively justified by a legitimate aim , and the means of achieving that aim are appropriate and necessary.


### (16) this regulation should not interfere with national legislation in the health area with objectives other than quality and safety of sohos that is compatible with union law , in particular legislation concerning ethical aspects. such aspects arise due to the human origin of the substances , which touches upon various sensitive and ethical concerns for member states and citizens , such as access to particular services that use sohos. this regulation should also not interfere with decisions of an ethical nature made by member states. such ethical decisions might concern the use , or limitation of the use , of specific types of sohos or specific uses of sohos , including reproductive cells and embryonic stem cells. when a member state allows the use of such cells , this regulation should apply in full with a view to ensuring safety and quality and to protecting human health. ### (16) national legislation in the health area with objectives other than quality and safety of sohos , in particular legislation concerning ethical aspects , shall take precedence over the provisions of this regulation. such aspects arise due to the human origin of the substances , which touches upon various sensitive and ethical concerns for member states and citizens , such as access to particular services that use sohos. this regulation shall also not interfere with decisions of an ethical nature made by member states , and , in particular , no provision of this regulation may be construed as imposing an obligation on member states to use types of sohos that are legally prohibited in that member state. decisions concerning the use , or limitation of the use , of specific types of sohos or specific uses of sohos , including reproductive cells and embryonic stem cells , are an exclusive competence of the member states. when a member state allows the use of such cells , this regulation should apply in full with a view to ensuring safety and quality and to protecting human health.


### (18) as a matter of principle , programmes promoting the donation of sohos should be founded on the principle of voluntary and unpaid donation , altruism of the donor and solidarity between donor and recipient. voluntary and unpaid soho donation is also a factor which can contribute to high safety standards for sohos and therefore to the protection of human health. it is also recognised , including by the council of europe committee on bioethics24 , that while financial gain should be avoided , it may also be necessary to ensure that donors are not financially disadvantaged by their donation. thus , compensation to remove any such risk is acceptable but should never constitute an incentive that would cause a donor to be dishonest when giving their medical or behavioural history or to donate more frequently than is allowed , posing risks to their own health and to that of prospective recipients. such compensation should , therefore , be set by national authorities , at a level appropriate in their member state to reach such objectives. ### (18) as a matter of principle , programmes promoting the donation of sohos should be founded on the principle of voluntary and unpaid donation , altruism of the donor and solidarity between donor and recipient. it is also recognised , including by the council of europe committee on bioethics24 , that while financial gain should be avoided , it may also be necessary to ensure that donors are not financially disadvantaged by their donation. thus , compensation to remove any such risk is acceptable but should never constitute an incentive that would cause a donor to be dishonest when giving their medical or behavioural history or to donate more frequently than is allowed , posing risks to their own health and to that of prospective recipients. such compensation should , therefore , be set by national authorities , at a level appropriate in their member state to reach such objectives.


### (18) as a matter of principle , programmes promoting the donation of sohos should be founded on the principle of voluntary and unpaid donation , altruism of the donor and solidarity between donor and recipient. voluntary and unpaid soho donation is also a factor which can contribute to high safety standards for sohos and therefore to the protection of human health. it is also recognised , including by the council of europe committee on bioethics24 , that while financial gain should be avoided , it may also be necessary to ensure that donors are not financially disadvantaged by their donation. thus , compensation to remove any such risk is acceptable but should never constitute an incentive that would cause a donor to be dishonest when giving their medical or behavioural history or to donate more frequently than is allowed , posing risks to their own health and to that of prospective recipients. such compensation should , therefore , be set by national authorities , at a level appropriate in their member state to reach such objectives. ### (18) as a matter of principle , programmes promoting the donation of sohos should be founded on the principle of voluntary and unpaid donation , altruism of the donor and solidarity between donor and recipient and may help to ensure the traceability of the donor. voluntary and unpaid soho donation is also a factor which can contribute to ensuring the traceability of the donor and high safety standards for sohos and therefore to the protection of human health. it is also recognised , including by the council of europe committee on bioethics24 , that while financial gain should be avoided , it may also be necessary to ensure that donors are not financially disadvantaged by their donation. thus , compensation to remove any such risk is acceptable but should never constitute an incentive that would cause a donor to be dishonest when giving their medical or behavioural history or to donate more frequently than is allowed , posing risks to their own health and to that of prospective recipients. such compensation should , therefore , be set by national authorities , at a level appropriate in their member state to reach such objectives.


### (22) for the performance of supervisory activities aimed at verifying the correct application of soho legislation , member states should designate competent authorities that act in the public interest , are appropriately resourced and equipped , and offer guarantees of impartiality , professionalism and transparency. when infringements relate to direct health risks , and the publication of information regarding those infringements can contribute to risk mitigation and the protection of donors , recipients or offspring from medically assisted reproduction , competent authorities should , where necessary , be able to prioritise transparency of their enforcement activities over the protection of confidentiality of the party that has infringed the regulation. ### (22) for the performance of supervisory activities aimed at verifying the correct application of soho legislation , member states should designate competent authorities that act in the public interest , are appropriately resourced and equipped , and offer guarantees of impartiality , professionalism and transparency. when infringements relate to direct health risks , and the publication of information regarding those infringements can contribute to risk mitigation and the protection of donors , recipients or offspring from medically assisted reproduction , competent authorities should , where necessary , be able to prioritise transparency of their enforcement activities over the protection of confidentiality of the party that has infringed the regulation. matters covered by trade secrecy or infringements of the law until such time as the competent court has issued a ruling may not be the subject of such public information.


### (26) commission experts should be able to perform controls , including audits , in member states to verify the effective application of the relevant requirements of competent authorities and of the supervisory activity systems. commission controls should also serve to investigate and collect information on enforcement practices or problems , emergencies and new developments in member states. official controls should be performed by personnel who are independent , free from any conflict of interest and in particular who are not in a situation which , directly or indirectly , could affect their ability to carry out their professional duties in an impartial manner. ### (26) commission experts should be able to perform controls , including audits , in member states to verify the effective application of the relevant requirements of competent authorities and of the supervisory activity systems. official controls may only be carried out with the agreement of the member state , in compliance with the organisational rules , functioning and powers of the national supervisory authorities. official controls should be performed by personnel who are independent , free from any conflict of interest and in particular who are not in a situation which , directly or indirectly , could affect their ability to carry out their professional duties in an impartial manner.


### (33) with regards to standards concerning donor , recipient and offspring protection , this regulation should provide for a hierarchy of rules for their implementation. as risks and technologies change , this hierarchy of rules should facilitate an efficient and responsive uptake of the most up-to-date guidelines for implementing the standards set out in this regulation. as part of that hierarchy , in the absence of union legislation describing particular procedures to be applied and followed to meet the standards set out in this regulation , following the guidelines of the european centre for disease prevention and control (ecdc) and the edqm should be considered as a means to demonstrate compliance with the standards laid down in this regulation to ensure high level of quality , safety and efficacy. soho entities should be permitted to follow other guidelines , provided that it has been demonstrated that those other guidelines achieve the same level of quality , safety and efficacy. in cases of detailed technical issues for which neither union legislation nor the ecdc and the edqm have defined a technical guideline or rule , operators should apply a locally defined rule that is in line with relevant internationally recognised guidelines and scientific evidence and is appropriate to mitigate any risk identified. ### (33) with regards to standards concerning donor , recipient and offspring protection , this regulation should provide for a hierarchy of rules for their implementation. as risks and technologies change , this hierarchy of rules should facilitate an efficient and responsive uptake of the most up-to-date guidelines for implementing the standards set out in this regulation. as part of that hierarchy , in the absence of union legislation describing particular procedures to be applied and followed to meet the standards set out in this regulation , following the guidelines of the european centre for disease prevention and control (ecdc) and the edqm should be considered as one of the means to be compliant with the standards laid down in this regulation to ensure high level of quality , safety and efficacy. member states may decide that soho entities should be permitted to follow other recognised guidelines that are based on scientific evidence and achieve an appropriate level of quality , safety and efficacy. in cases of detailed technical issues for which neither union legislation nor the ecdc and the edqm have defined a technical guideline or rule , operators should apply a locally defined rule that is in line with relevant recognised guidelines and is appropriate to mitigate any risk identified.


### (35) the edqm is a structural part of the council of europe working under the european pharmacopoeia partial agreement. the text of the convention on the elaboration of a european pharmacopoeia (ets no. 050) , accepted by council decision 94/358/ec26 , is considered to be the text of the european pharmacopoeia partial agreement. member states of the council of europe that have signed and ratified the european pharmacopoeia convention are themember states of the european pharmacopoeia partial agreement and are therefore the members of the intergovernmental bodies functioning within the framework of this partial agreement , including among others: the european pharmacopoeia commission , the european committee on organ transplantation (cd-p-to) , the european committee on blood transfusion (cd-p-ts) and the european committee on pharmaceuticals and pharmaceutical care (cd-p-ph). the european pharmacopoeia convention has been signed and ratified by the european union and all its member states , all of whom are represented in their intergovernmental bodies. in this context , the work of the edqm on developing and updating guidelines on safety and quality of blood , tissues and cells , should be considered an important contribution to the field of sohos in the union and should be reflected in this regulation. the guidelines address issues of quality and safety beyond the risks of communicable disease transmission , such as donor eligibility criteria for the prevention of the transmission of cancer and other non-communicable diseases and the assurance of safety and quality during collection , processing , storage and distribution. it should therefore be possible to use those guidelines as one of the means to implement the technical standards provided for in this regulation. ### (35) the edqm is a structural part of the council of europe working under the european pharmacopoeia partial agreement. the text of the convention on the elaboration of a european pharmacopoeia (ets no. 050) , accepted by council decision 94/358/ec26 , is considered to be the text of the european pharmacopoeia partial agreement. member states of the council of europe that have signed and ratified the european pharmacopoeia convention are alsomember states of the european pharmacopoeia partial agreement and are therefore the members of the intergovernmental bodies functioning within the framework of this partial agreement , including among others: the european pharmacopoeia commission , the european committee on organ transplantation (cd-p-to) , the european committee on blood transfusion (cd-p-ts) and the european committee on pharmaceuticals and pharmaceutical care (cd-p-ph). the european pharmacopoeia convention has been signed and ratified by the european union and all its member states , all of whom are represented in their intergovernmental bodies. in this context , the work of the edqm on developing and updating guidelines on safety and quality of blood , tissues and cells , should be considered an important contribution to the field of sohos in the union and should be reflected in this regulation , without prejudice to the union’s legal autonomy. the guidelines address issues of quality and safety beyond the risks of communicable disease transmission , such as donor eligibility criteria for the prevention of the transmission of cancer and other non-communicable diseases and the assurance of safety and quality during collection , processing , storage and distribution. it should therefore be possible to use those guidelines as one of the means to implement the technical standards provided for in this regulation. in order to comply with the union requirements for review of union legislation , a transparent and open stakeholder consultation process shall be put in place for the development of those provisions and guidelines from the expert bodies.the committees referred to and any working parties and scientific advisory groups established within those committees shall develop appropriate contacts with public and private key stakeholders , including patients , consumers , health professionals , and industry representatives.


### (35) the edqm is a structural part of the council of europe working under the european pharmacopoeia partial agreement. the text of the convention on the elaboration of a european pharmacopoeia (ets no. 050) , accepted by council decision 94/358/ec26 , is considered to be the text of the european pharmacopoeia partial agreement. member states of the council of europe that have signed and ratified the european pharmacopoeia convention are the member states of the european pharmacopoeia partial agreement and are therefore the members of the intergovernmental bodies functioning within the framework of this partial agreement , including among others: the european pharmacopoeia commission , the european committee on organ transplantation (cd-p-to) , the european committee on blood transfusion (cd-p-ts) and the european committee on pharmaceuticals and pharmaceutical care (cd-p-ph). the european pharmacopoeia convention has been signed and ratified by the european union and all its member states , all of whom are represented in their intergovernmental bodies. in this context , the work of the edqm on developing and updating guidelines on safety and quality of blood , tissues and cells , should be considered an important contribution to the field of sohos in the union and should be reflected in this regulation. the guidelines address issues of quality and safety beyond the risks of communicable disease transmission , such as donor eligibility criteria for the prevention of the transmission of cancer and other non-communicable diseases and the assurance of safety and quality during collection , processing , storage and distribution. it should therefore be possible to use those guidelines as one of the means to implement the technical standards provided for in this regulation. ### (does not affect the english version.)