Vulnerability: GHSA-6v7p-v754-j89v
Summary: HTTP Response Splitting in Styx
Aliases: CVE-2020-6858
Severity: MODERATE
CVSS score: 6.5
CWE: CWE-74
Published: 2020-03-03T15:32:03Z

# Vulnerability
Styx is vulnerable to CWE-113: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers (&#39;HTTP Response Splitting&#39;).

# Vulnerable Component
The vulnerable component is the `com.hotels.styx.api.HttpHeaders.Builder` due to disabling the HTTP Header validation built into Netty in these locations:

https://github.com/HotelsDotCom/styx/blob/e1d578e9b9c38df9cd19c21dc2eb9b949d85b558/components/api/src/main/java/com/hotels/styx/api/HttpHeaders.java#L145

https://github.com/HotelsDotCom/styx/blob/e1d578e9b9c38df9cd19c21dc2eb9b949d85b558/components/api/src/main/java/com/hotels/styx/api/HttpHeaders.java#L145

`new DefaultHttpHeaders(false)` disables the built-in validation in Netty. Either use the default constructor or `new DefaultHttpHeaders(true`  instead.

Additionally, another vulnerable component is the StyxToNettyResponseTranslator due to also disabling the HTTP Header validation built into netty in this location.

https://github.com/HotelsDotCom/styx/blob/8d60e5493e65d0d536afc0b350dcb02d24e0f7a7/components/server/src/main/java/com/hotels/styx/server/netty/connectors/StyxToNettyResponseTranslator.java#L30

 `DefaultHttpResponse nettyResponse = new DefaultHttpResponse(version, httpResponseStatus, false); `
`new DefaultHttpResponse(version, httpResponseStatus, false);` disables the built-in validation in Netty. Please use the constructor `new DefaultHttpResponse(version, httpResponseStatus, true);`

# Proof of Concept
The following test plugin proves that there is no header validation occurring.

```java
    static class VulnerablePlugin implements Plugin {

        @Override
        public Eventual&lt;LiveHttpResponse&gt; intercept(LiveHttpRequest request, Chain chain) {
            String header = request.queryParam(&quot;header-value&quot;).get();
            LiveHttpRequest newRequest = request.newBuilder()
                .header(&quot;myRequestHeader&quot;, header)
                .build();
            return chain.proceed(newRequest).map(response -&gt;
                response.newBuilder().header(&quot;myResponseHeader&quot;, header).build()
            ) ;
        }

    }

    @Test
    public void simpleHeaderInjectionVulnerabilityPOC() {
        Plugin vulnerablePlugin = new VulnerablePlugin();
        // a simple way to mock the downstream system
        HttpInterceptor.Chain chain = request -&gt; {
            assertThat(request.header(&quot;myRequestHeader&quot;).orElse(null), is(&quot;test\r\nAnother: CRLF_Injection&quot;));
            return Eventual.of(response(OK).build());
        };

        // an example request you expect your plugin to receive
        String encodedGet = URLEncoder.encode(&quot;test\r\nAnother: CRLF_Injection&quot;);
        LiveHttpRequest request = get(&quot;/foo?header-value=&quot; + encodedGet)
            .build();

        // since this is a test, we want to wait for the response
        LiveHttpResponse response = Mono.from(vulnerablePlugin.intercept(request, chain)).block();

        assertThat(response.header(&quot;myResponseHeader&quot;).orElse(null), is(&quot;test\r\nAnother: CRLF_Injection&quot;));
    }
```
Additionally, if you run this LiveHttpResponse from this test through the `StyxToNettyResponseTranslator::toNettyResponse`, ideally, it would have caused an exception to be thrown. In its current state, it does not.

# Similar Vulnerabilities
There have been reports of similar vulnerabilities in other popular libraries.

GHSA-35fr-h7jr-hh86 -&gt; CVE-2019-16771
GHSA-mvqp-q37c-wf9j -&gt; CVE-2019-17513


# Finding
This vulnerability was found due to this query that [Jonathan Leitschuh](https://twitter.com/jlleitschuh) contributed to the Semmle QL project.
https://lgtm.com/rules/1510696449842/alerts/