正题——揭示文章的中心,必须简明扼要,而又耐人寻味,能够引起读者的阅读兴趣,同时也能给读者带来审美愉悦,它是贯穿全文的主线;副题——点明评论对象,交待片名或评论角度,它是正题必要的补充。二者相得益彰,能使文章增色不少。如《历史和时代的搏击者——评银幕上的共产党员形象》,《悲剧在红色中渗透——评电影》。 我们在写影评的过程中,要不断总结学习他人的写作经验,丰富自己的写作实践,在日积月累的基础上,通过影评的写作,不断促进我们知识结何的完善,提高我们的颀赏水平和审美能力。 How to Write a Movie Review Writing a movie review is a great way of expressing your opinion of a movie. The purpose of most movie reviews is to help the reader in determining whether they want to watch, rent or buy the movie. The review should give enough details about the movie that the reader can make an informed decision, without giving anyway any essentials such as the plot or any surprises. Below are our guidelines and tips for writing a good movie review. Submit your movie review Watch the movie The first step in writing the review is to watch the movie. Watch the movie in a relaxed environment you are familiar with. You do not want to be distracted by an unfamiliar room. Watching the movie a second time will help you absorb a lot more detail about the movie. Most movie reviewers take notes as they watch the movie review. Give your opinion Most movie reviewers will give their opinion of the movie. This is important as the reviewer can express the elements of the movie they enjoyed or disliked. However, as in all good journalism, the reviewer should also give impartial details, and allow the reader to make their own mind over an issue the reader liked or disliked. Opinions should be explained to allow the reader to determine whether they would agree with your opinion . Many regular movie reviewers will develop a following. If one can find a reviewer who shares a similar taste in films, one can confidently follow the reviewers recommendations. Who is your audience? You need to consider who your likely readers are. Writing a movie review for children requires a different approach than if writing for a movie club. Ensure you report on the factors that matter to your likely audience. Give an outline Give the outline of the movie, but don't give away essential details such as the end or any surprises. If there is a big surprise you want to entice readers by telling them something special happens, just don't say what. Actors (演员) If the movie contains actors, as most do, detail who is starring in the movie and how well you think they acted. Structure Did the movie follow a regular predictable story line, or did it get you thinking like a Quentin Tarantino movie? Cinematography and lighting (电影艺术和灯光效果) Give details about how well the movie was shot and directed. Was the lighting good in the moody scenes? Music Did the movie have its own score like Koyaanisqatsi or ET, or did it feature songs from popular artists? Read, read and read Read and check your review thoroughly. It can be embarrassing to find errors in your work after it has been published. This is especially important for reviews that will be published on the Internet, as search engines are always looking for the correct spellings of key words. Submit your movie review 英文电影影评范文 侏罗纪公园3英文影评 Jurassic Park III(2001 "Jurassic Park III" is neither as dreadful as it might be, nor as perfectly wrought as it could be. For one thing, it moves along as jauntily as one of those horrific raptors scooting along the plain; the movie wraps itself up so quickly, and after such a relatively low-key climax, that you can barely believe it's over. It runs about 90 minutes, and that's sweet relief. You can get your fix of dino effects (most of which are starting to look pretty familiar anyway, after the original "Jurassic Park" and "The Lost World: Jurassic Park"), with a few good jokes and interesting performances thrown in, and be on your way. One of the best things about "Jurassic Park III" is that it brings back Sam Neill, who starred in the original, and he's a distinctly human and humane presence. As the movie opens, we see Neill's adventuresome paleontologist, Dr. Alan Grant, playing with the toddler of his former collaborator Dr. Ellie Satler (Laura Dern, in a nicely played cameo), who has settled down with an earnest, unexciting husband and is quietly raising their two kids. Neill plays the scene beautifully: He's half puzzled by the idea that anybody would want to settle down to a life like this, and half wistfully jealous that it's just not for him. He has no desire to see any more live dinosaurs up close and personal. Nonetheless, he and his young assistant Billy (Alessandro Nivola) are reluctantly roped into an adventure expedition to Isla Sorna (the "Site II" from "The Lost World," where the prehistoric horrors were bred in a flagrant expression of human arrogance), by Amanda and Paul Kirby (Téa Leoni and William H. Macy), a rich couple hankering for danger. Of course, they have another motive. But the bare-bones plot, from a script written by Peter Buchman, Alexander Payne (writer and director of "Election" and "Citizen Ruth") and Jim Taylor (who co-wrote those pictures with Payne), is probably the last reason anybody would go to see it. What most of us want are dinosaurs, and there are just the right number of those here, from a flock of fierce pterodactyl-like pteranodons with mischievously knowing eyes, to the dreaded raptors (who always look to me as if they should be dangling old-lady pocketbooks from their disproportionately smallish, curled-over front claws). Although it's probably still too intense for very small children, "Jurassic Park III" features a blessed minimum of torso chewing. The worst part is watching one of the raptors use a giant toenail to puncture the spine of a minor character played by Michael Jeter -- he's too fine an actor to meet such a ignominious end. Another saving grace of "Jurassic Park III" is that it captures some of the wonder from the first picture. Director Joe Johnston ("Honey, I Shrunk the Kids," "Jumanji") is much more low-key than his predecessor Steven Spielberg, who directed the first two pictures in the series. Thankfully, he's out to set us rambling and bumping on a scary-funny amusement park ride; he doesn't hammer on the whiskery old theme of man-playing-God, nor does he seem to take much pleasure in the requisite bloody chomping, even though he of course has to include some of it. And he offers us one extraordinary panorama that looks as if it had been lifted straight out of those softly colored educational picture books of the '50s and '60s, a group of peaceful vegetarian apatosauruses against a purply pink Maxfield Parrish sky on the banks of a canal, chomping placidly on the plants they so love to eat. Dr. Grant and his group view the scene as they pass by it on a barge, and Neill plays the moment perfectly, like a man deep in love. It's as if a sight like this could make up for any number of dreadful dinosaur encounters. The other actors here are just as game. As Eric, a kid who's been stranded on the island, Trevor Morgan shows the kind of appealing resourcefulness that's always fun for kids to watch. Macy is more than serviceable in a throwaway role: He manages to give his cowardly-lion character a great deal of charm and comic texture. Leoni does the best she can with her character, but there's not much to work with: She doesn't get a chance to use her best gift, a flair for snappy, screwball-comedy timing that sparkled in her short-lived TV show "The Naked Truth." Even so, Payne, Buchman and Taylor give us plenty of little things to laugh at along the way: Dr. Grant and Eric have a pleasingly tossed-off exchange as Grant incredulously holds up a bottle of T. Rex pee that Eric has collected. "How did you get this?" he demands. "You don't wanna know," Eric deadpans ruefully. There are a few moments in the picture that are streaked with a sense of terror, scenes where you think the absolute worst is going to happen. But it never quite does. There's a surprisingly delicate touch at work in "Jurassic Park III," and the movie is marbled through with strands of acerbic wit. You might think that a filmmaker's going to that much trouble in a "Jurassic Park" picture is like casting pearls before swine. What chance do pearls have under the feet of prehistoric giants? Miraculously, they survive the trampling intact, and they're what you remember long after the last mighty footstep resonates. II.电影名称 第六周 《当幸福来敲门》 The Pursuit of Hapiness 导演加布里尔·穆奇诺 上映日期2006年12月15日 北美票房163,566,459美元 首周票房26,541,709美元 发行公司索尼 票房成绩威尔·史密斯第一次征战圣诞档就大胜而归,成本仅5500万美元的 《当幸福来敲门》的首周票房只有2654万,但此后越战越勇,最终 在《博物馆之夜》这些大制作影片的夹缝中擒回64亿美元,证明 史密斯不愧是好莱坞第一人。而在海外市场,这部影片也大有王者 风范,07亿的总票房在全球票房榜的名列第13位。 评论《当幸福来敲门》是威尔·史密斯迄今为止口碑最佳的影片,IMDB评 分高达8分。影评人对这部影片也不吝赞美之词。《旧金山纪事报》的米克·拉塞尔评论说“这部影片带来的最大惊喜是,它并不粗糙,非常诚实不做作。”《纽约时报》的麦诺拉·达吉斯则写道“这部影片是现实世界的童话,史密斯和他儿子的表演压倒了一切。”《滚石》杂志的彼得·特拉维斯说“史密斯正在走向奥斯卡,他的这个角色需要把严谨、聪明、魅力、幽默和热情合二为一,他做到了这一点。”