《三国史记》载:“水城郡 本高句麗買忽郡,景德王改名 今水州”,“買忽—云水城”,“買召忽縣—云彌邹忽”,“南川縣—云南買”,“述川郡—云省知買馬忽”,“內乙買(內買)—云內尒米”。李基文认为,因为“買、美、彌”出现在相关语句中,并其汉语语音相近,意义相同,且在上下文中对照中可以看出“忽”为城市之义,故“水城郡、買郡、水州、内乙買、内尒美、贾召忽、彌邹忽”中的“忽与郡、買与水”可以置换,将“買”读音可构拟为*mj、*mi、*mji。高句丽语与中世纪朝鲜语具有可比性,汉字“買”意为“水”。[7]38-39“城”从夫余人的“沟娄”演变成高句丽与及百济语的“忽”,而“水”则至今没有发生变化。现代朝鲜语“水”的读音为mu(),通古斯语中读音为muu。
参考文献:
[1] 李德山.夫余起源新论[J]. 社会科学战线,1991(2).
[2] 吴文衔,张湘泰,魏国忠.黑龙江古代简史[M]. 哈尔滨:北方文物杂志出版社,1987: 36-37.
[3] Northeast Asian History Foundation. Kogyuryo-A Glorious Ancient Koran Kingdom in Northeast Asia [M]. Seoul, 2007:9.
[4] LI Yong-g. The Names for dog in the modern Turkic Languages [J]. Altan Hakpo-Journal of the Altaic Society of Korea, 2013.6:191.
[5] 黄斌,刘厚生. 高句丽史话 [M]. 呼和浩特:远方出版社,2005:5-12.
[6] Lee, Ki-Moon & Ramsey, S. Robert. A History of the Korean Language [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
[7] Beckwith, Christopher I. KOGURYO THE LANGUAGE OF JAPAN’S CONTINENTAL RELATIVES: An Introduction to The Historical-Comparative Study of the Japanese —Koguryoic Languages With a Preliminary Description of Archaic Northeastern Middle Chinese [J]. Leiden Boston: Brill, 2004.
[8] 朱学渊. 新版中国北方诸族的源流[M]. 上海:华东师范大学出版社,2010.
[9] 张士东,杨军. 夫余族名的音与义[J]. 黑龙江民族丛刊,2010,(6).
[10]Sohn, Ho-Min. The Korean Language[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
[11]Ilyon. Samguk Yusa-Legends and History of the Three Kingdom of Ancient Korea [M]. Seoul: Yonsei University Press, 2007.
[12]Jones, B. J. & Rie, Gene S.Standard English-Korean / Korean-English Dictionary for Foreigners[K]. Seoul: Hollym Corp. Publishers, 1991.
[13]尹铁超.“嘎仙”语义考[J]. 满语研究,2000,(2).
[14]尹铁超.鲜卑名考[J]. 满语研究,2001,(2).
[15]YIN Tiechao. Another study on Tungusic ending “-na/-nε /-n”[J]. International Journal of Central Asian Studies, 8-1, 2003.
[16]郭孟秀.肃慎与挹娄关系再议[J].民族研究,2012,(5).
[17]凌纯声.松花江下游的赫哲人[M]. 北京:民族出版社,2012:522.
[18]韩有峰,孟淑贤.鄂伦春语汉语对照读本[M]. 北京:中央民族大学出版社,1993:12.
[19]胡增益. 鄂伦春语研究[M]. 北京:民族出版社,2001:52.
[20]Tungus Etymology, compiled by Sergei Starostin (Altaic Etymology Website).
[21]Swadesh, Morris.Linguistics as an Instrument of Prehistory [J].Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 15 (1959).
Puyo and Its Relation with Tungus Languages——from the Research on Word “People”
YIN Tie-chao Zhao Zhi-gang
(a. School of Western Studies, b.School of Eastern Studies, Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150080, China)
Abstract:The decipherment of the nameFuyu in terms of sound value and meaning is not clear. Based on the attempts by Li De shan, Zhang Shi dong and Yang Jun, whose previous studies have laid bases and suggestive foundation in both sound value and meaning interpretation, this paper intends to further study following the same clue. The conclusion of the paper shows that if a comparison is done with pronunciation and meaning of the name Fuyu and suffixes of personal pronouns in Tungusic languages, it is obvious that the Fuyu and the Tungusic language are highly possible originated from the same origin.
Key words:Fuyu; people; Tungus suffix;
收稿日期:2014-12-20
作者简介:尹铁超(1958-),男,黑龙江哈尔滨人,教授,博士生导师,主要从事通古斯语历史语言学研究;赵志刚(1975-),男(朝鲜族),黑龙江哈尔滨人,教授,主要从事日本语言史研究。
基金项目:国家社科基金项目(项目编号:12BYY105)