无张力疝气修补术和传统腹股沟疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的效果及复发率 【摘要】 目的:对比无张力疝气修补术和传统腹股沟疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的效果差异及对复发率的影响。方法:选取 2012 年 4 月-2015 年 10 月笔者所在医院 92 例腹股沟疝患者,随机分为研究组和对照组,每组 46 例。对照组患者采用传统腹股沟疝修补术,研究组实施无张力疝气修补术,使用 SF-36 量表评价生活质量,对两组患者的手术时间、术中失血量、抗生素治疗时间、住院时间、生活质量评分、并发症情况及复发率进行综合比较。结果:研究组的手术时间、抗生素治疗时间及住院时间较对照组短(P 【关键词】 无张力疝气修补术; 传统腹股沟疝修补; 腹股沟疝; 复发 中图分类号 R656.2 文献标识码 B 文章编号 1674-6805(2016)29-0021-02 The Effect and Recurrence of Tension-free Hernia Repair and Traditional Inguinal Hernia Repair for Inguinal Hernia/JIANG Zhi-guo.//Chinese and Foreign Medical Research,2016,14(29):21-22 【Abstract】 Objective:To compared the difference of the efficacy of tension hernia repair and traditional inguinal herniorrhaphy for inguinal hernia and effect on the recurrence rate.Method:From April 2012 to October 2015,92 cases of inguinal hernia in our hospital were randomly divided into the study group and the control group,46 cases in each group.Patients in the control group were used traditional inguinal herniorrhaphy,the study group was given tension-free hernia repair,SF-36 scale was used to evaluate the quality of life,operation time,blood loss,duration of antibiotic treatment,hospitalization time,quality of life score,complications and recurrence rate in two groups were compared.Result:Operative time,duration of antibiotic therapy and hospitalization time in the study group were shorter than those in the control group