Exhibit 10.2

Compensation Summary
(As reported in The Hershey Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed February 22, 2006)

Base Salaries. On February 15, 2006, the Compensation and Executive Organization
Committee (“Committee”) of the Board of Directors of The Hershey Company (the
“Company”) approved the base salaries of the executive officers who will be
named in the Company’s 2006 Proxy Statement (“Named Executive Officers”) other
than Richard H. Lenny, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive
Officer, and on February 16, 2006, the Committee recommended to the Company’s
independent directors as a group the base salary for Mr. Lenny, as follows:

Name
Base Salary
Richard H. Lenny
$ 1,100,000
Marcella K. Arline
$    375,000
Michele G. Buck
$    400,000
Thomas K. Hernquist
$    420,000
Burton H. Snyder
$    435,000
David J. West
$    485,000

The independent directors as a group approved the recommended base salary for
Mr. Lenny on February 16, 2006. Base salaries are effective as of January 1,
2006.

2006 Annual Incentive Program (AIP) Target Goals. On February 15, 2006, the
Committee approved the target grants for a 2006 AIP award under the Company’s
Key Employee Incentive Plan (“Incentive Plan”) for executive officers other than
Mr. Lenny, and on February 16, 2006, the Committee recommended to the
independent directors as a group a target grant for Mr. Lenny’s 2006 AIP award.
For executive officers other than Mr. Lenny, the final award is the product of
the executive officer’s base salary, the applicable target percentage and a
performance score calculated as the sum of a corporate performance score and an
individual score. The corporate performance objectives for the Named Executive
Officers other than Mr. Lenny are based on the Company’s earnings per
share-diluted, consolidated net sales and earnings before interest and taxes
(“EBIT”) margin. The range of the target percentages of base salary used in the
2006 AIP target grants for the Named Executive Officers other than Mr. Lenny is
60% to 70%. For Mr. Lenny, the Committee recommended to the independent
directors that his final award be calculated on the basis of a contingent target
maximum grant. For 2006, the Committee recommended that the independent
directors waive the maximum AIP award specified in Mr. Lenny’s March 12, 2001
Executive Employment Agreement and approve a contingent target maximum grant for
Mr. Lenny equal to the maximum AIP award available to executive officers under
the Incentive Plan with an award at this maximum

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

being contingent upon his achievement of his 2006 corporate performance goal
from among the corporate performance objectives for the other Named Executive
Officers. The Committee, in its recommendation to the independent directors of a
final 2006 AIP award for Mr. Lenny, whether at or below the maximum level, will
consider such corporate and individual performance factors it deems relevant.
The Committee has the right to adjust the Company’s performance results, if
necessary, to take into account extraordinary or unusual items occurring during
the performance year, subject, in the case of Mr. Lenny, to the approval of the
independent directors as a group. The independent directors as a group approved
the Committee’s recommended 2006 AIP target grant for Mr. Lenny on February 16,
2006.

Performance Stock Unit (PSU) Awards for the 2003-2005 Cycle. The Committee
approved PSU awards under the Incentive Plan for the Named Executive Officers
other than Mr. Lenny effective February 16, 2006, and recommended to the
independent directors as a group a PSU award under the Incentive Plan for Mr.
Lenny, as follows:
 
 
Name
Performance
Stock Unit Award
Mr. Lenny
145,000 units
Ms. Arline
16,500 units
Mr. Hernquist
18,250 units
Mr. Snyder
22,250 units
Mr. West
18,000 units

The independent directors as a group approved the recommended PSU award for Mr.
Lenny on February 16, 2006. Ms. Buck was not eligible for a PSU award for the
2003-2005 cycle.

PSUs awarded for the 2003-2005 performance cycle will not be paid out until
their normal vesting date on December 31, 2008 or, if earlier, an accelerated
vesting date based upon the executive’s retirement, disability or death. If an
executive’s employment terminates prior to December 31, 2008 other than by
retirement, disability or death, the PSU award will be forfeited. Once vested,
the award will be paid in shares of Company Common Stock plus regular dividends
from January 1, 2006 to the vesting date.

PSU Grant for the 2006-2008 Cycle. The Committee also approved, effective
February 16, 2006, contingent target grants of PSUs under the Incentive Plan for
executive officers other than Mr. Lenny, and on February 16, 2006, the Committee
recommended to the independent directors as a group a contingent target grant of
PSUs under the Incentive Plan for Mr. Lenny, for the 2006-2008 PSU performance
cycle. PSU grants are based upon a percentage of the executive officer’s base
salary and are earned based upon the Company’s performance relative to certain
performance objectives over the three-year cycle. The performance objectives for
the 2006-2008 performance cycle are as follows: the Company’s three-year
compound annual growth in earnings per share-diluted measured against an
internal target and measured against the three-year

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

compound annual growth in earnings per share-diluted of a peer group of 15 food,
beverage and consumer packaged goods companies and the cumulative three-year
improvement in the Company’s economic return on invested capital measured
against an internal target. The total performance score can range from a minimum
of 0% to a maximum of 250% based upon each of the performance measurements
having a 50% weighted value in the formula. Upon completion of the performance
cycle, an award will be paid on the basis of the number of PSUs originally
awarded to the executive, the Company’s performance against the performance
objectives for the cycle and the value per unit, which is determined at the
conclusion of the cycle based upon the average of the daily closing prices of
the Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange in December of the final year of
the cycle. The Committee has the right to adjust the Company’s performance
results, if necessary, to take into account extraordinary or unusual items
occurring during the performance cycle, subject, in the case of Mr. Lenny, to
the approval of the independent directors as a group. Awards will be paid only
in shares of Common Stock. The independent directors as a group approved the
Committee’s recommended contingent target PSU grant for Mr. Lenny on February
16, 2006.
 
Stock Option Grants. The Committee approved stock option grants under the
Incentive Plan for the executive officers other than Mr. Lenny, and recommended
to the independent directors as a group a stock option grant to Mr. Lenny, all
such grants to be effective February 16, 2006. The independent directors as a
group approved the grant of stock options to Mr. Lenny on February 16, 2006. All
such grants were made subject to the Incentive Plan and the Terms and Conditions
for stock option grants previously filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.

Additional information regarding the compensation of the Company’s executive
officers will be provided in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2006 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed in March 2006.