Exhibit 10.20                   

EXECUTION VERSION

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

This SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is entered into by and between Power
Integrations, Inc., a Delaware corporation with an office at 5245 Hellyer
Avenue, San Jose, California 95138 (together with its Affiliates, as defined
below, “PI”), and ON Semiconductor Corporation, a Delaware corporation with an
office at 5005 East McDowell Road, Phoenix, Arizona 85008 (together with its
Affiliates, “ON”), as of October 19, 2019 (the “Effective Date”).

 

1.

Definitions.

“Acquirer” means the person or entity or group of persons or entities acquiring
the stock or assets of a Party (or otherwise assuming control of a Party) in a
Change of Control Transaction.

“Affiliate(s)” of a Party means any and all Entities, past, present, or future,
that are or were Controlled, directly or indirectly, by the Party, but only for
so long as such Control exists or existed.

“Agreement” shall have the meaning ascribed to it in the preamble.

“Assert” (or “Assertion”) means bringing, commencing, filing, prosecuting, or
otherwise instituting, or funding, encouraging or assisting any third party in
bringing, commencing, filing, prosecuting, or otherwise instituting, any patent
infringement claim, petition for declaratory judgment of non-infringement of any
patent, or other proceeding alleging infringement or non-infringement,
invalidity, or unenforceability of any patent before any legal, judicial,
arbitral, administrative, executive, or other body or tribunal, anywhere in the
world, that has or claims to have authority to adjudicate such claim, including
without limitation any court or arbitral body, the U.S. International Trade
Commission, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, the Chinese Patent Office, the
Taiwan Patent Office, and the European Patent Office.

“Binding Term Sheet” means the Binding Term Sheet by and between the Parties
executed on October 2, 2019.

“Change of Control” means the transfer, assignment, sale, lease, loan, or other
disposition of any material portion of the tangible or intangible assets,
personnel, technology, equipment, or business, equity interest, or voting
interest of a Party that are related to this Agreement.

“Change of Control Transaction” means a single transaction, or a transaction
that is part of a series of transactions (including a merger and a triangular
merger) to effect a Change of Control.

“Control” means the legal, beneficial, or equitable ownership of more than fifty
percent (50%) of (i) the voting power representing the right to vote for
directors or other managing authority, (ii) equity ownership interest in an
Entity, or (iii) other ownership interest in an Entity.

“Cooling Off Period” shall mean the period commencing on the Effective Date and
continuing for a period of three (3) years from the Release Date.

“Effective Date” shall have the meaning ascribed to it in the preamble.

 

1

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

EXECUTION VERSION

 

 

“Entity” means a corporation, association, partnership, business trust, joint
venture, limited liability company, proprietorship, unincorporated association,
or other entity that can exercise independent legal standing.

“Fee” means One Hundred Seventy-Five Million United States Dollars
(US$175,000,000), subject to Section 5.

“ON” shall have the meaning ascribed to it in the preamble.

“Party” means PI or ON and “Parties” means PI and ON.

“Pending Proceedings” means the proceedings set forth in Exhibit A, some of
which are further classified therein as either “Fairchild Legal Proceedings” or
“ON Semi Legal Proceedings.”

“PI” shall have the meaning ascribed to it in the preamble.

“Released Claims” means any and all claims and judgments for damages or monetary
relief for acts of patent infringement asserted in any of the Pending
Proceedings occurring on or before the Release Date.

“Release Date” means June 30, 2020.

2.        Dismissals. Within five (5) business days after PI has received the
Fee, the Parties shall jointly submit to the relevant court or administrative
body a document in the applicable form attached hereto as Exhibits C through L
in order to withdraw, dismiss, or terminate (with or without prejudice as
reflected in the applicable form) all claims made and judgments entered in the
Pending Proceedings, including appeals therefrom, and the Parties will cooperate
to terminate each such proceeding. The Parties intend and will request that each
Fairchild Legal Proceeding will be dismissed with prejudice and that each ON
Semi Legal Proceeding will be dismissed without prejudice. For the IPRs and
associated appeals listed in Exhibit A, (1) for any IPRs having a pending appeal
to the Federal Circuit, the Parties will jointly request the appeal be
dismissed, (2) for any IPRs for which the final written decision has been
vacated by the Federal Circuit, the Parties will jointly request that the IPR be
dismissed per the applicable order of the Federal Circuit, and (3) for any IPR
that is currently pending before the PTAB, the Parties will jointly request
termination.

3.        Mutual Releases. Contingent upon ON’s performance under Section 5, PI
does hereby for itself and its Affiliates irrevocably and forever release and
absolutely discharge (a) ON, including its Affiliates, and their respective
employees, representatives, agents, officers, directors, past, present, and
future, of and from any and all Released Claims, and (b) each of the direct and
indirect distributors, resellers, representatives, customers, and end users of
ON, including its Affiliates, of and from any and all Released Claims to the
extent directed to a product of ON, including its Affiliates. ON does hereby for
itself and its Affiliates irrevocably and forever release and absolutely
discharge (a) PI, including its Affiliates, and their respective employees,
representatives, agents, officers, directors, past, present, and future, of and
from any and all Released Claims, and (b) each of the direct and indirect
distributors, resellers, representatives, customers, and end users of PI,
including its Affiliates, of and from any and all Released Claims to the extent
directed to a product of PI, including its Affiliates. The Parties acknowledge
and

 

2

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

EXECUTION VERSION

 

 

agree that this Agreement fully and finally releases and forever resolves the
Released Claims that are unknown, unanticipated, or unsuspected or that may
hereafter arise as a result of the discovery of new or additional facts. The
Parties acknowledge and understand the significance and potential consequence of
the release of unknown claims. The Parties intend that the Released Claims
released under this Agreement be construed as broadly as possible and agree to
waive and relinquish all rights and benefits each may have under Section 1542 of
the Civil Code of the State of California, or any similar statute or law of any
other jurisdiction, with respect to the Released Claims. Section 1542 reads as
follows: “A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS THAT THE CREDITOR OR
RELEASING PARTY DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS OR HER FAVOR AT THE
TIME OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE AND THAT, IF KNOWN BY HIM OR HER WOULD HAVE
MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS OR HER SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR OR RELEASED PARTY.”

4.        Standstill. Each Party represents and warrants as of the Effective
Date that it has not made any new Assertion that is not identified in Exhibit A,
which each Party represents contains an up-to-date list of all Assertions by
either Party as of the Effective Date. Each Party further represents and
warrants as of the Effective Date that it has no knowledge of any Assertion
outside the United States by a third-party Entity or individual against the
other Party, other than the assertions identified in Exhibit A and other than
the assertion initiated by Huizhou Jinhu Industrial Development Co., Ltd. with
respect to the Chinese patent number ZL200410061704.6. Provided that PI has
received the Fee, during the Cooling Off Period, neither Party nor any of its
Affiliates shall make any Assertion against the other Party or any of its
Affiliates. Further, provided that PI has received the Fee, neither Party, nor
any of its Affiliates, during the Cooling Off Period will make any Assertion
against any direct or indirect distributor, representative, reseller, customer,
or end user of the other Party to the extent based on an allegation of patent
infringement directed to a product of the other Party. The foregoing constitutes
a limited, non-exhaustive standstill during the Cooling Off Period only and not
a license, release, or other intellectual property right or immunity. For the
avoidance of doubt and without limitation, after the end of the Cooling Off
Period, a Party is not precluded by this Agreement from filing suit, seeking
recovery of damages occurring during or after the Cooling Off Period for alleged
or actual infringement, or from seeking an injunction against future
infringement occurring after the Cooling Off Period, subject to all applicable
laws anywhere in the world, including 35 U.S.C. § 286 and other applicable
statutes of limitations. For the further avoidance of doubt, the absence of an
Assertion during the Cooling Off Period shall not be relied on by either Party
as a basis for a denial of an injunction. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Party
may initiate a challenge to the validity and enforceability of any patent
Asserted against such Party or any of its Affiliates, or against any of their
respective products during the Cooling Off Period. Each Party agrees that breach
of this Section 4 by one Party will cause irreparable harm and significant
injury to the other Party, the extent of which will be difficult to ascertain
and for which there will be no adequate remedy at law. Accordingly, each Party
agrees that the other Party, in addition to any other available remedies, shall
have the right to an immediate injunction and other equitable relief enjoining
any breach or threatened breach of this Section 4 without the necessity of
posting any bond or other security and the court may dismiss or terminate the
claims brought in violation of this Section 4 without prejudice to Assertion
after the Cooling Off Period. Neither Party may assign or otherwise transfer any
of its rights under any patents the Assertion of which is subject to this
Section 4 unless such assignment or transfer is expressly made subject to this
Agreement. The Parties agree that during the Cooling Off Period they will not
manufacture or sell copies of

 

3

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

EXECUTION VERSION

 

 

the other Party’s products derived from reverse engineering at the schematic
level (copying to be determined at the overall product level, and not just with
reference to a single feature or subset of features) provided that this sentence
shall in no case apply to (a) a Party’s products that were on sale or otherwise
publicly announced prior to or as of the Effective Date, or (b) a Party’s
products that were accused of infringement in any of the Pending Proceedings.

5.        Payment. Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC, an Affiliate of ON
Semiconductor Corporation, will pay Power Integrations, Inc. the Fee no later
than October 23, 2019, via electronic transfer to the following account:

 

                    

 

Bank Name:

  

[Redacted]

       

SWIFT Code:

  

[Redacted]

       

ABA#:

  

[Redacted]

       

Account Name:

  

[Redacted]

       

Account Number:

  

[Redacted]

     

The Fee is non-refundable and constitutes the complete monetary consideration
for PI to enter into this Agreement and complete satisfaction for any and all
judgments entered in the Pending Proceedings.

6.        No Admission of Liability. The Parties agree that the settlement of
the Released Claims is intended solely as a compromise of the disputed claims,
and without any acknowledgment of liability, fault, damages, or any other merits
of the Released Claims and the Pending Proceedings. Nothing in this Agreement
shall extinguish, impair, or otherwise affect any defense or position of PI or
ON that patents are not infringed, invalid, or not enforceable, or that any
claims are barred by equitable estoppel, implied license, statute of limitation,
or laches. Nor shall this Agreement be admissible in any legal proceeding as a
basis to claim infringement or non-infringement of any patent. Neither Party is
waiving any argument or position (now or in the future) that any order, ruling
or judgment that is currently the subject of any pending appeal that is being
dismissed with or without prejudice in connection with the Settlement was in
error.

7.        No License. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed as
conferring or granting by implication, estoppel or otherwise, any right or
license, express or implied, under any patent, copyright, mask work, trade name,
trademark, service mark, trade secret right, other identification of source or
origin belonging to the other Party, other proprietary right or other
intellectual property right, whether now existing or hereafter obtained, and no
such license or other right shall arise from this Agreement or from any acts or
omissions in connection with the execution of this Agreement or the performance
of the obligations of the Parties hereunder.

8.        Payment of Costs and Expenses. Each Party shall be responsible for
payment of its own attorneys’ fees and other costs, disbursements and expenses
arising out of or relating to the Parties’ legal proceedings through the
Effective Date.

9.        Notices. Any notice or communication required or permitted to be given
by either Party hereunder shall be in written form and shall be considered to be
sufficiently given if transmitted and confirmed by overnight courier, addressed
to the Parties hereto as follows:

 To PI:

 

4

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

EXECUTION VERSION

 

 

Power Integrations, Inc.

5245 Hellyer Avenue

San Jose, California 95138

ATTN:  President

With copy to:

Fish & Richardson

One Marina Park Drive

Boston, Massachusetts 02210

ATTN: Frank E. Scherkenbach

To ON:

ON Semiconductor Corporation

5005 East McDowell Road

Phoenix, Arizona 85008

ATTN:  Vice President and Chief IP Counsel

With copy to:

Morrison & Foerster LLP

755 Page Mill Road

Palo Alto, California 94304

ATTN:  Colette Reiner Mayer

or to such changed address as the addressee shall have specified by written
notice in accordance with this provision.

10.        Governing Law. The Parties hereto agree that this Agreement shall be
considered to have been made in, and construed and interpreted in accordance
with the substantive laws of Delaware. The Parties consent to the exclusive
jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware to
resolve any disputes relating to or arising out of this Agreement and agree to
have that court retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Agreement as
part of the Parties’ dismissal papers; provided, however, that any Party against
whom an action is brought may, at its sole election, assert a claim arising from
this Agreement as a defense or counterclaim in such an action and, in those
circumstances, the court in that action shall also have jurisdiction to resolve
the asserted defense or counterclaim based on this Agreement and to provide an
appropriate remedy.

11.        Representations and Warranties. Each of Power Integrations, Inc. and
ON Semiconductor Corporation represents and warrants that it is a corporation in
good standing under the laws of the state of Delaware; that it has the authority
to enter into this Agreement; and that this Agreement is valid, binding and
enforceable in accordance with its terms. Each of Power Integrations, Inc. and
ON Semiconductor Corporation further represents and warrants that it has
sufficient right, title, and interest to grant the releases and enter into the
standstill set forth in this Agreement.

 

5

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

EXECUTION VERSION

 

 

12.        408+ Agreement Modification. Each Party agrees that the Binding Term
Sheet dated October 2, 2019 and this Agreement shall not be subject to the
Confidentiality and Federal Rule of Evidence 408+ Agreement dated August 22,
2019 (the “408+ Agreement,” as amended pursuant to the immediately following
sentence), and waives and releases the other Party from any claim to liability,
including without limitation any claim of actual or liquidated damages, due to
the public disclosure or public discussion of the terms of the Binding Term
Sheet or this Agreement.

13.        No Right to Terminate. Neither Party may terminate this Agreement
without the express, written consent of the other Party.

14.        Fee shifting. The Parties agree that the prevailing Party in any
action relating to or arising out of this Agreement will be awarded its
reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs incurred as a result of such a proceeding.

15.        Waiver. No waiver of this Agreement or any of the promises,
obligations, terms, or conditions herein shall be valid unless it is written and
signed by the Party against whom the waiver is to be enforced. No valid waiver
of any of the promises, obligations, terms, or conditions herein shall be deemed
a subsequent waiver of any of such promises, obligations, terms, or conditions,
nor shall any such waiver constitute a continuing waiver. Failure to insist on
compliance with a term, covenant, or condition contained in this Agreement shall
not be deemed a waiver of that term, covenant, or condition.

16.        Severability. In the event that any provision of this Agreement is
prohibited by any law governing its construction, performance or enforcement,
such provision shall be ineffective to the extent of such prohibition without
invalidating thereby any of the remaining provisions of this Agreement and the
Parties shall craft a substitute provision that most closely effects the
Parties’ intent.

17.        Amendment. The terms and conditions of this Agreement may not be
modified or amended except in a writing which states that it is a modification,
and is signed by an officer or a duly authorized representative of each Party.

18.        Change of Control. Notwithstanding any other statement in this
Agreement, this Agreement and/or the Binding Term Sheet (or any parts thereof)
may not be assigned other than in, or in connection with, any Change of Control
Transaction, and then only on the condition that the Acquirer first enters into
an agreement of the form set out in Exhibit B (Written Declaration of
Assumption), acknowledging and transferring obligations under the Agreement and
the Binding Term Sheet to the Acquirer. Any attempted assignment in derogation
of the foregoing sentence is null and void. Any violation of the foregoing
condition shall constitute a material breach of the Agreement and the
Non-Acquired Party reserves the right to terminate the Agreement upon notice to
the Acquired Party.

After the Written Declaration of Assumption has been signed by the Acquirer and
the Acquired Party, and the Change of Control Transaction effected, the
covenants provided in the Agreement and the Binding Term Sheet: (i) apply to any
patent (x) owned, controlled, or enforceable by the Acquired Party prior to the
Change of Control Transaction; and (y) based on any invention conceived of by
Acquirer after the Change of Control Transaction in the context of the
continuation of Acquired Party’s business, but (ii) do not apply to any patent
(x) owned,

 

6

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

EXECUTION VERSION

 

 

controlled or enforceable by Acquirer before the Change of Control Transaction;
or (y) based on any invention conceived of by Acquirer after the Change of
Control Transaction outside the context of the continuation of the Acquired
Party’s business.

19.        Headings for Convenience Only. The headings contained in this
Agreement are for convenience and reference purposes only and shall not affect
the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement.

20.        Rules of Construction. The Parties hereto agree that they have been
represented by counsel during the negotiation and execution of this Agreement.
The language used in this Agreement shall be deemed to be language chosen by all
Parties to express their mutual intent, and no rule of strict construction
against any Party shall be applied to any term or provision hereof.

21.        Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement
between the Parties concerning the subject matter hereof and supersedes all
written and oral prior agreements and understandings with respect thereto,
including without limitation the Binding Term Sheet. No variation or
modification of the terms of this Agreement, nor any waiver of any of the terms
or provisions hereof, shall be valid unless in writing and signed by an
authorized representative of each Party.

22.        Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in two counterparts in
the English language and each such counterpart shall be deemed an original
thereof. Facsimile signatures or signatures delivered by e-mail in .pdf or
similar format will be deemed original signatures for purposes of this
Agreement.

[The remainder of this page is blank; signature page follows.]

 

7

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

EXECUTION VERSION

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed
as of the Effective Date. Each individual signing below represents and warrants
that he or she has authority to sign for and enter into this Agreement on behalf
of his or her respective Party.

 

Agreed to:

   

Agreed to:

POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.

   

ON SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

By:

 

/s/ Balu Balakrishnan

   

By:

 

/s/ Keith Jackson

Name:

 

Balu Balakrishnan

   

Name:

 

Keith Jackson

Title:

 

President & CEO

   

Title:

 

President and CEO

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

EXECUTION VERSION

 

 

EXHIBIT A

PENDING PROCEEDINGS

    UNITED STATES

Case Name

  

Case No.

  

Venue

  

Classification

Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc. and
Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation    No. 04-1371-LPS    Delaware    Fairchild
Legal Proceeding Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor
International, Inc. and Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation   

No. 2019-1246,

No. 2019-1247

   Fed. Cir.    Fairchild Legal Proceeding Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild
Semiconductor International, Inc., Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation, and
Fairchild (Taiwan) Corporation    No. 08-309 LPS    Delaware    Fairchild Legal
Proceeding Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor International,
Inc., Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation, and Fairchild (Taiwan) Corporation   

No. 2019-2377,

No. 2020-1007

   Fed. Cir.    Fairchild Legal Proceeding Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild
Semiconductor International, Inc., Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation, and
Fairchild (Taiwan) Corporation    No. 09-cv-05235-MMC    N.D. Cal.    Fairchild
Legal Proceeding Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation and Fairchild (Taiwan)
Corporation v. Power Integrations, Inc.    No. 12-cv-00540-LPS    Delaware   
Fairchild Legal Proceeding Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation and Fairchild
(Taiwan) Corporation v. Power Integrations, Inc.   

No. 2019-2378,

No. 2020-1003

   Fed. Cir.    Fairchild Legal Proceeding Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild
Semiconductor International, Inc., Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation, and
Fairchild (Taiwan) Corporation    No. 15-cv-04854-MMC    N.D. Cal.    Fairchild
Legal Proceeding Power Integrations, Inc. v. ON Semiconductor Corporation and
Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC   

No. 16-cv-6371-BLF,

No. 17-cv-3189-BLF

   N.D. Cal.    ON Semi Legal Proceeding ON Semiconductor Corporation and
Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC v. Power Integrations, Inc.    No.
17-cv-00247-LPS    Delaware    ON Semi Legal Proceeding In re: Application
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782 of SEMICONDUCTOR COMPONENTS INDUSTRIES, LLC v.
Power Integrations, Inc.    No. 19-mc-80163-NC    N.D. Cal.    ON Semi Legal
Proceeding

 

9

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

EXECUTION VERSION

 

 

In re: Application Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782 of SEMICONDUCTOR COMPONENTS
INDUSTRIES, LLC

Semiconductor Components, LLC v. Power Integrations, Inc.

 

   No. 19-16936    Ninth Cir.    ON Semi Legal Proceeding

 

10

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

EXECUTION VERSION

 

 

    PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA

   Beijing IP Bureau:   

ON Semi

Case number: 2019-1361   

Legal

Patent number: ZL200410061704.6   

Proceeding

Title of invention: 半导体装置及混合集成电路装置 (Semiconductor Device and Hybrid Integrated
Circuit Device)      Patentee: 半导体元件工业有限责任公司 (Semiconductor Components
Industries, LLC)      Petitioner: 半导体元件工业有限责任公司 (Semiconductor Components
Industries, LLC)      Respondent 1: 北京九大洲通讯设备有限责任公司 (Beijing Jiudazhou
Communication Instrument Co., Ltd.)     

Respondent 2: 惠州市锦湖事业发展有限公司 (Huizhou Jinhu Industrial Development Co., Ltd.)

 

     Shanghai IP Court:   

ON Semi

Case number: (2019) Hu 73 Zhi Min Chu 679 [(2019) LOGO [g864442dspa.jpg]
73知民初679号]   

Legal

Plaintiff: Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC   

Proceeding

Defendants: Power Integrations Netherlands B.V., Huizhou Jinhu Industrial
Development Co., Ltd. (惠州市锦湖实业发展有限公司), Shanghai Jiading Anting Chuanglian
Communication Devices Shop (上海市嘉定区安亭镇创联通讯器材店)          Case number: (2019) Hu 73
Zhi Min Chu 680 [(2019) LOGO [g864442dspa.jpg] 73知民初680号]      Plaintiff:
Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC     

Defendants: Power Integrations Netherlands B.V., Huizhou Jinhu Industrial
Development Co., Ltd. (惠州市锦湖实业发展有限公司), Shanghai Jiading Anting Chuanglian
Communication Devices Shop (上海市嘉定区安亭镇创联通讯器材店)

 

         TAIWAN   

Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC v. Power Integrations, Inc. and Power
Integrations Netherlands, B.V., Taiwan Branch (November 2017, Taiwan
Intellectual Property Court, 107-Ming-Chung-Su-Tzu-22, Appeal Docket No.:
108-Min-Zhuan-Shang- Zi-#21)

 

   ON Semi Legal Proceeding

 

11

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

EXECUTION VERSION

 

    IPRs and associated appeals

Patent and IPR #

  

USPTO Case Number

  

CAFC Appeal (if any)

’871#1

  

IPR2018-01810

  

n/a (still pending at USPTO)

’871#2

  

IPR2018-01812

  

n/a (still pending at USPTO)

’483#1

  

IPR2018-01816

  

n/a (still pending at USPTO)

’483#2

  

IPR2018-01818

  

n/a (still pending at USPTO)

’475#1

  

IPR2018-01811

  

n/a (still pending at USPTO)

’475#2

  

IPR2018-01813

  

n/a (still pending at USPTO)

’788#1

  

IPR2018-01814

  

n/a (still pending at USPTO)

’788#2

  

IPR2018-01815

  

n/a (still pending at USPTO)

’272

  

IPR2018-01539

  

n/a (still pending at USPTO)

’623

  

IPR2018-00166

  

CAFC 19-2173

(consolidated with 19-2174, 19-2177)

’471

  

IPR2018-00165

  

CAFC 19-2177 (con with 19-2173)

’119

  

IPR2018-00160

  

CAFC 19-2178

’221

  

IPR2018-00180

  

CAFC 19-2212

’624

  

IPR2017-01907

  

CAFC 19-1863 (con with 19-1868)

’764#1

  

IPR2017-01329

  

CAFC 19-1414

’841

  

IPR2016-01453

  

CAFC 19-1448

’605

  

IPR2016-01600

  

CAFC 18-1852

’876#2

  

IPR2016-01589

  

CAFC 18-1705

’457#2

  

IPR2016-01595

  

CAFC 18-1851

’079#1

  

IPR2016-00809

  

CAFC 18-1607

’079#2

  

IPR2016-01590

  

CAFC 18-2085 (con with 18-2086)

’079#3

  

IPR2016-01592

’908#1

  

IPR2016-00995

  

CAFC 18-1602 (con with 18-1741)

’908#2

  

IPR2016-01597

 

12

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

EXECUTION VERSION

 

Exhibit B

Written Declaration of Assumption

General Counsel

Non-Acquired Party

XXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXX

Re: Acquirer’s Agreement to Perform Obligations of Acquired Party

Dear General Counsel:

A Change of Control Transaction, as defined in the Settlement Agreement entered
into on _____________, 2019, between Power Integrations, Inc., a Delaware
Corporation with a principal place of business at 5245 Hellyer Avenue, San Jose,
CA 95138, and On Semiconductor, a Delaware corporation, with a principal place
of business at __________________ (the Agreement) has occurred with respect to
the Acquired Party, _________, having a principal place of business at
_________________________________.

The Non-Acquired Party consents to the Acquired Party assigning the Agreement,
and the Binding Term sheet entered into between the Acquired Party and the
Non-Acquired Party dated as of October 2, 2019 to the Acquirer. In consideration
of such consent, the Acquirer, ________________, having a principal place of
business at _________________, hereby agrees to keep, perform, and fulfill all
of the terms, covenants, conditions and obligations required to be kept,
performed, and fulfilled by the Acquired Party under the Agreement and the
Binding Term Sheet as of and following the effective date of the Change of
Control Transaction.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed
as of the Effective Date. Each individual signing below represents and warrants
that he or she has authority to sign for and enter into this Agreement on behalf
of his or her respective Party.

 

Agreed to:

  

Agreed to:

[ACQUIRER]

  

[NON-ACQUIRED PARTY]

By:____________________________________________

  

By:____________________________________________

Name:__________________________________________

  

Name:__________________________________________

Title:___________________________________________

  

Title:___________________________________________

Date:___________________________________________

  

Date:___________________________________________

 

13

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

EXECUTION VERSION

 

 

EXHIBIT C AND FOLLOWING

 

14

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

EXHIBIT C

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

 

POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.,

    

Plaintiff,

    

v.

       

C.A. No. 04-1371-LPS

FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR

  

INTERNATIONAL, INC. and FAIRCHILD

  

SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION,

    

Defendant.

 

  

JOINT MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR

VOLUNTARY DIMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE [F.R.C.P. RULE 41(a)(2)]

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) and a settlement agreement,
the parties jointly move that this Court dismiss this action with prejudice,
with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.

Neither Party is waiving any argument or position (now or in the future) that
any order, ruling, or judgment was in error in any of the parties’ cases that is
being dismissed with or without prejudice in connection with the parties’
settlement agreement, including any arguments that were the subject of any
appeal dismissed pursuant to the parties’ settlement agreement.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ASHBY & GEDDES

    

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

/s/

 

    

  

/s/

John G. Day (#2403)

    

Douglas E. McCann (#3852)

Andrew C. Mayo (#5207)

    

222 Delaware Ave, 17th Floor

500 Delaware Avenue, 8th Floor

    

Wilmington, DE 19801

P.O. Box 1150

    

(302) 652-5070

Wilmington, DE 19899

    

DMcCann@fr.com

(302) 654-1888

jday@ashbygeddes.com

    

Frank E. Scherkenbach

amayo@ashbygeddes.com

    

One Marina Park Drive

    

Boston, MA 02210-1878

Attorneys for Defendants

    

(617) 542-5070

    

Howard G. Pollack

    

Michael R. Headley

    

500 Arguello Street, Suite 500

    

Redwood City, CA 94063

    

(650) 839-5070

    

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Dated: October __, 2019

    

 

SO ORDERED this ____ day of _______________, 2019.

 

 

 

 

Chief Judge

 

2

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

EXHIBIT D

 

1

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

 

POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.,

    

Plaintiff,

    

v.

       

C.A. No. 08-309-LPS

FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR

  

INTERNATIONAL, INC., FAIRCHILD

  

SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, and

  

FAIRCHILD (TAIWAN) CORPORATION

    

Defendant.

 

  

JOINT MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR

VOLUNTARY DIMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE [F.R.C.P. RULE 41(a)(2)]

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) and a settlement agreement,
the parties jointly move that this Court dismiss this action with prejudice,
with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.

Neither Party is waiving any argument or position (now or in the future) that
any order, ruling, or judgment was in error in any of the parties’ cases that is
being dismissed with or without prejudice in connection with the parties’
settlement agreement, including any arguments that were the subject of any
appeal dismissed pursuant to the parties’ settlement agreement.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ASHBY & GEDDES

    

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

/s/

 

    

  

/s/

John G. Day (#2403)

    

Douglas E. McCann (#3852)

Andrew C. Mayo (#5207)

    

222 Delaware Ave, 17th Floor

500 Delaware Avenue, 8th Floor

    

Wilmington, DE 19801

P.O. Box 1150

    

(302) 652-5070

Wilmington, DE 19899

    

DMcCann@fr.com

(302) 654-1888

jday@ashbygeddes.com

    

Frank E. Scherkenbach

amayo@ashbygeddes.com

    

One Marina Park Drive

    

Boston, MA 02210-1878

Attorneys for Defendants

    

(617) 542-5070

    

Howard G. Pollack

    

Michael R. Headley

    

500 Arguello Street, Suite 500

    

Redwood City, CA 94063

    

(650) 839-5070

    

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Dated: October __, 2019

    

SO ORDERED this ____ day of _______________, 2019.

 

 

 

Chief Judge

 

2

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

EXHIBIT E

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COLETTE REINER MAYER (SBN 263630)

  

FRANK E. SCHERKENBACH

CRMayer@mofo.com

  

(SBN 142549)

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

  

scherkenbach@fr.com

755 Page Mill Road

  

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1018

  

One Marina Park Drive

Tel: (650) 813-5600

  

Boston, MA 02110-2804

Fax: (650) 494-0792

  

Telephone: (617) 542-5070

Attorneys for Defendants

  

HOWARD G. POLLACK

FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR

  

(SBN 162897)

INTERNATIONAL, INC., FAIRCHILD

  

pollack@fr.com

SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, and

  

MICHAEL R. HEADLEY

FAIRCHILD (TAIWAN) CORPORATION

  

(SBN 220834)

  

headley@fr.com

  

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

  

500 Arguello Street, Suite 500

  

Redwood City, CA 94063

  

Telephone: (650) 839-5070

  

Attorneys for Plaintiff

  

POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

 

POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.,   

Case No.  3:09-cv-5235-MMC

a Delaware corporation,        

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

Plaintiff,

  

ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY

v.

  

DIMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

    

[F.R.C.P. RULE 41(A)(2)]

FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR INTERNATIONAL,

INC., a Delaware corporation, FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, a Delaware
corporation, and FAIRCHILD (TAIWAN) CORPORATION, a Taiwanese corporation,

  

 

Hon. Maxine M. Chesney

 

Defendants.

 

  

 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

Case No. 3:09-cv-5235-MMC

  

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) and a settlement agreement,
it is hereby stipulated by the parties to this action, through their respective
counsel, that this Court dismiss this action with prejudice. It is further
stipulated and agreed that each party will bear its own costs and attorneys’
fees.

Neither Party is waiving any argument or position (now or in the future) that
any order, ruling, or judgment was in error in any of the parties’ cases that is
being dismissed with or without prejudice in connection with the parties’
settlement agreement, including any arguments that were the subject of any
appeal dismissed pursuant to the parties’ settlement agreement.

 

Dated:  October ___, 2019

  

Respectfully submitted,

  

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

  

By:

  

 /s/ DRAFT

     

COLETTE REINER MAYER

     

Attorney for Defendants

     

FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR

     

INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

     

FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR

     

CORPORATION, AND FAIRCHILD

     

(TAIWAN) CORPORATION

Dated: October __, 2019

  

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

  

By:

  

 /s/ DRAFT

     

MICHAEL R. HEADLEY

     

Attorneys for Plaintiff

     

POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.

 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

Case No. 3:09-cv-5235-MMC

   1

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest under penalty of perjury that
concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from counsel for
Plaintiff.

 

Dated: October ___, 2019

  

 /s/ DRAFT

  

        

  

    COLETTE REINER MAYER

  

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

Dated: _______________

  

 

  

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

  

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

Case No. 3:09-cv-5235-MMC

   2

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

EXHIBIT F

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ERIK J. OLSON (SBN 175815)

EJOlson@mofo.com

COLETTE REINER MAYER (SBN 263630)

CRMayer@mofo.com

PIETER S. DE GANON (SBN 320385)

PdeGanon@mofo.com

STEPHEN LIU (SBN 318533)

SLiu@mofo.com

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

755 Page Mill Road

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1018

Tel: (650) 813-5600 | Fax: (650) 494-0792

 

JIANING LIU (SBN 305568)

JennyLiu@mofo.com

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

425 Market Street

San Francisco, California 94105-2482

Tel: (415) 268-7000 | Fax: (415) 268-7522

 

ROGER FULGHUM (Pro Hac Vice)

roger.fulghum@bakerbotts.com

BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.

910 Louisiana Street

Houston, Texas 77002

Tel: (713) 229-1234 | Fax: (713) 229-1522

 

Attorneys for Defendants

FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR

INTERNATIONAL, INC., FAIRCHILD

SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, and

FAIRCHILD (TAIWAN) CORPORATION

  

FRANK E. SCHERKENBACH

(SBN 142549)

scherkenbach@fr.com

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

One Marina Park Drive

Boston, MA 02110-2804

Telephone: (617) 542-5070

 

HOWARD G. POLLACK

(SBN 162897)

pollack@fr.com

MICHAEL R. HEADLEY

(SBN 220834)

headley@fr.com

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

500 Arguello Street, Suite 500

Redwood City, CA 94063

Telephone: (650) 839-5070

 

Attorneys for Plaintiff

POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

 

 

POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.,   

Case No.     3:15-cv-04854-MMC

 

Plaintiff,

  

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

    

ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY

    v.   

DIMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

[F.R.C.P. RULE 41(A)(2)]

FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR

INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Delaware corporation, FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR
CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, and FAIRCHILD (TAIWAN) CORPORATION, a
Taiwanese corporation,

  

 

Hon. Maxine M. Chesney

 

Defendants.

 

  

 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

Case No. 3:15-cv-04854-MMC

  

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) and a settlement agreement,
it is hereby stipulated by the parties to this action, through their respective
counsel, that this Court dismiss this action with prejudice, including all
claims and counterclaims by any of the parties. It is further stipulated and
agreed that each party will bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.

Neither Party is waiving any argument or position (now or in the future) that
any order, ruling, or judgment was in error in any of the parties’ cases that is
being dismissed with or without prejudice in connection with the parties’
settlement agreement, including any arguments that were the subject of any
appeal dismissed pursuant to the parties’ settlement agreement.

 

Dated:   October ___, 2019

  

Respectfully submitted,

  

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

  

By:

  

 /s/ DRAFT

     

COLETTE REINER MAYER

     

Attorney for Defendants

     

FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR

     

INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

     

FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR

     

CORPORATION, AND FAIRCHILD

     

(TAIWAN) CORPORATION

Dated: October __, 2019

  

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

  

By:

  

 /s/ DRAFT

     

MICHAEL R. HEADLEY

     

Attorneys for Plaintiff

     

POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.

 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

Case No. 3:15-cv-04854-MMC

   1

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest under penalty of perjury that
concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from counsel for
Plaintiff.

 

 

Dated:   October ___, 2019

  

  /s/ DRAFT

  

        

  

    COLETTE REINER MAYER

  

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

Dated: ____________

  

 

  

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

  

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

Case No. 3:15-cv-04854-MMC

   2

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

EXHIBIT G

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Roger Fulghum (Pro hac vice)

  

Frank E. Scherkenbach (CA #142549)

roger.fulghum@bakerbotts.com

  

scherkenbach@fr.com

BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.

  

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

910 Louisiana Street

  

One Marina Park Drive

Houston, TX 77002

  

Boston, Massachusetts 02210-1878

Telephone: (713) 229-1234

  

Telephone: (617) 542-5070

Facsimile: (713) 229-1522

  

Facsimile: (617) 542-8906

Colette Reiner Mayer (CA SBN 263630)

  

Howard G. Pollack (CA #162897)

CRMayer@mofo.com

  

pollack@fr.com

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

  

Michael R. Headley (CA #220834)

755 Page Mill Road

  

headley@fr.com

Palo Alto, California 94304-1018

  

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

Telephone: (650) 813-5600

  

500 Arguello Street, Suite 500

Facsimile: (650) 494-0792

  

Redwood City, California 94063

  

Telephone: (650) 839-5070

Attorneys for ON SEMICONDUCTOR

  

Facsimile: (650) 839-5071

CORP. AND SEMICONDUCTOR

  

COMPONENTS INDUSTRIES, LLC

  

Attorneys for POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

 

POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.,    Case No.     16-cv-06371-BLF  

Plaintiff,

  

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

    

ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY

v.   

DIMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

    

[F.R.C.P. RULE 41(A)(2)]

ON SEMICONDUCTOR CORP. and    SEMICONDUCTOR COMPONENTS   

INDUSTRIES, LLC,

 

  

Defendants.

 

        Case No. 3:17-cv-03189 BLF

ON SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION;

and SEMICONDUCTOR COMPONENTS

   INDUSTRIES, LLC,   

 

Plaintiffs,

    

v.

     POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.     

Defendant.

 

 

  

 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

Case No. 16-cv-06371-BLF

  

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) and a settlement agreement,
the parties hereby stipulate and jointly move that this Court dismiss this
action without prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’
fees.

Neither Party is waiving any argument or position (now or in the future) that
any order, ruling, or judgment was in error in any of the parties’ cases that is
being dismissed with or without prejudice in connection with the parties’
settlement agreement, including any arguments that were the subject of any
appeal dismissed pursuant to the parties’ settlement agreement.

 

Dated:   October ___, 2019

  

Respectfully submitted,

  

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

  

By:

  

 /s/ DRAFT

     

COLETTE REINER MAYER

     

Attorneys for ON SEMICONDUCTOR

     

CORP. AND SEMICONDUCTOR

     

COMPONENTS INDUSTRIES, LLC

Dated: October __, 2019

  

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

  

By:

  

 /s/ DRAFT

     

MICHAEL R. HEADLEY

     

Attorneys for POWER

     

INTEGRATIONS, INC.

 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

Case No. 16-cv-06371-BLF

   1

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest under penalty of perjury that
concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from counsel for
Plaintiff.

 

Dated:   October ___, 2019

  

 /s/ DRAFT

  

        

  

    COLETTE REINER MAYER

  

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

Dated:                     

  

 

  

BETH LABSON FREEMAN

  

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

Case No. 16-cv-06371-BLF

   2

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

EXHIBIT H

 

1

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

 

 

 

ON SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION and SEMICONDUCTOR COMPONENTS

  

C.A. No.     17-247-LPS-CJB

INDUSTRIES, LLC,  

Plaintiffs,

    

v.

 

     POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.,     

 

Defendant.

       

 

JOINT MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR

VOLUNTARY DIMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE [F.R.C.P. RULE 41(a)(2)]

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) and the Settlement
Agreement, the parties jointly move that this Court dismiss this action without
prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.

Neither Party is waiving any argument or position (now or in the future) that
any order, ruling or judgment that is currently the subject of any pending
appeal that is being dismissed with or without prejudice in connection with the
Settlement was in error.

This Court retains jurisdiction for the purpose of ensuring compliance with the
Settlement Agreement entered into by the parties on October ___, 2019, a
redacted version of which is attached as Exhibit A.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ASHBY & GEDDES

    

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

/s/

 

    

  

/s/

John G. Day (#2403)

    

Joseph B. Warden

Andrew C. Mayo (#5207)

    

Warren K. Mabey, Jr.

500 Delaware Avenue, 8th Floor

    

222 Delaware Ave, 17th Floor

P.O. Box 1150

    

Wilmington, DE 19801

Wilmington, DE  19899

    

(302) 652-5070

(302) 654-1888

    

warden@fr.com

jday@ashbygeddes.com

    

mabey@fr.com

amayo@ashbygeddes.com

         

John W. Shaw (No. 3362)

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

    

Andrew E. Russell (No. 5382)

    

SHAW KELLER LLP

    

I.M. Pei Building

    

1105 North Market Street, 12th Floor

    

Wilmington, DE 19801

    

(302) 298-0700

    

jshaw@shawkeller.com

    

arussell@shawkeller.com

    

Dated: October __, 2019

    

Attorneys for Defendant

SO ORDERED this ____ day of _______________, 2019.

 

 

 

Chief Judge

 

2

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

EXHIBIT I

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Nos. 19-1246, 19-1247

 

 

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

 

 

POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.,

                                                                 
            Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant,

v.

FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

                                                                
             Defendants-Appellants.

 

 

 

JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS INTERLOCUTORY APPEALS

 

 

 

Appellants Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc. and Fairchild
Semiconductor Corporation and cross-appellant Power Integrations, Inc.
respectfully request under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b) that the
Court dismiss these appeals from an order that the District Court certified
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
41(a)(2) and a settlement agreement, the parties have dismissed the underlying
district court action with prejudice. The parties have agreed that each side
will bear its own costs associated with the appeals.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Neither Party is waiving any argument or position (now or in the future) that
any order, ruling, or judgment that is currently the subject of the present
appeal and cross-appeal was in error.

 

 

Dated: October _, 2019    Respectfully submitted, s/    s/ KATHLEEN M. SULLIVAN
   FRANK SCHERKENBACH QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &    FISH & RICHARDSON, PC
SULLIVAN, LLP    One Marina Park Drive 51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor    Boston,
MA 02210 New York, NY 10010    Telephone: (617) 542-5070 Telephone: (212)
849-7000    KEVIN ALEXANDER SMITH   

MICHAEL R. HEADLEY

HOWARD G. POLLACK

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &    NEIL WARREN SULLIVAN, LLP    FISH & RICHARDSON, PC
50 California Street, 22nd Floor    500 Arguello Street San Francisco, CA 94111
   Redwood City, CA 94063 Telephone: (415) 875-6600    Telephone: (650) 839-5070
   JOHN WINSTON THORNBURGH    FISH & RICHARDSON, PC    12390 El Camino Real   
San Diego, CA 921303    Telephone: (858) 678-5070 Counsel for
Defendants-Appellants Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc. and Fairchild
Semiconductor Corporation    Counsel for Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant Power
Integrations, Inc.

 

2

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CERTIFICATE OF INTEREST

Counsel for plaintiffs-cross-appellants Power Integrations certify the
following:

1.      The full name of every party or amicus represented by me is:

Power Integrations, Inc.

2.      The name of the Real Party in interest (Please only include any real
party in interest NOT identified in Question 3) represented by me is:

N/A

3.      All parent corporations and any publicly held companies that own 10% or
more of the stock of the party or amicus curiae represented by me are:

BlackRock, Inc.

4.      The names of all law firms and the partners or associates that appeared
for the party or amicus now represented by me in the trial court or agency or
are expected to appear in this court (and who have not or will not enter an
appearance in this case) are:

Fish & Richardson P.C.: Frank. E. Scherkenbach, Howard G. Pollack, Michael R.
Headley, Neil A. Warren, John W. Thornburgh, Craig Countryman, Jonathan J.
Lamberson, Michael J. Kane, Douglas E. McCann, Joseph B. Warden, William J.
Marsden,* Tamara D. Fraizer,* Kyle W. Compton,* David J. Miclean,* Gina M.
Steele,* Sean P. Hayes,*Desa L. Burton*, John D. Hamann*, John Horvath*; and
Abrams & Bayliss LLP: John M. Seaman.

(*No longer with firm.)

5.      The title and number of any case known to counsel to be pending in this
or any other court or agency that will directly affect or be directly affected
by this court’s decision in the pending appeal:

Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor et al., USDC-D. DE Case
04-1371-LPS; Power Integrations, Inc v. Fairchild Semiconductor et al., USDC-D.
DE Case 08-309-LPS.

 

Dated:  October _, 2019   

/s/

      [NAME]                   

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CERTIFICATE OF INTEREST

Counsel for defendants-appellants Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc.
and Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation certify the following:

1.      The full name of every party or amicus represented by me is:

Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc.; Fairchild Semiconductor Corp.

2.      The name of the Real Party in interest (Please only include any real
party in interest NOT identified in Question 3) represented by me is:

N/A

3.      All parent corporations and any publicly held companies that own 10% or
more of the stock of the party or amicus curiae represented by me are:

Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc. and Fairchild Semiconductor
Corporation are 100% owned direct or indirect subsidiaries of ON Semiconductor
Corporation. Except for ON Semiconductor Corporation, none of the foregoing
entities or any other direct or indirect subsidiary of ON Semiconductor
Corporation is publicly traded.

4.      The names of all law firms and the partners or associates that appeared
for the party or amicus now represented by me in the trial court or agency or
are expected to appear in this court (and who have not or will not enter an
appearance in this case) are:

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP: Kathleen M. Sullivan, Kevin A. Smith,
Cleland B. Welton II

ASHBY & GEDDES: John G. Day, Steven J. Balick, Andrew Colin Mayo, Tiffany Geyer
Lydon, Lauren E. Maguire*

ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP. Bas de Blank, George Hopkins Guy III*, Vickie
L. Feeman, Raymis H. Kim*, Duo Chen, Brian H. VanderZanden*, William L.
Anthony*, Gabriel M. Ramsey*

MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP: Brett E. Bachtell, Terrence P. MacMahon, Leigh J.
Martinson, Eric W. Hagen

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP: Colette Reiner Mayer

PAUL HASTINGS LLP: Blair M. Jacobs, Christina A. Ondrick, Patrick Stafford*

ON Semiconductor: Joshua Engel

* Attorneys no longer with designated firms.

5.      The title and number of any case known to counsel to be pending in this
or any other court or agency that will directly affect or be directly affected
by this court’s decision in the pending appeal:

Power Integrations, Inc v. Fairchild Semiconductor et al., USDC-D. DE Case
04-1371-LPS.

 

Dated:  October _, 2019

  

/s/ Kathleen M. Sullivan

  

 

  

Kathleen M. Sullivan

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

This motion complies with the type-volume limitations in Federal Rules of
Appellate Procedure 27 and 32 because it contains __ words.

 

Dated:  October _, 2019

  

  /s/

  

  [NAME]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the
Court for the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit by using
the CM/ECF system on October _, 2019.

I certify that all participants in the case are registered CM/ECF users and that
service will be accomplished by the CM/ECF system.

 

Dated:  October _, 2019

  

/s/

  

 

  

[NAME]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

EXHIBIT J

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Nos. 19-2377, 20-1007

 

 

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

 

 

POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.,

                                                                 
            Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant,

v.

FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION,

FAIRCHILD (TAIWAN) CORPORATION

                                                                 
            Defendants-Appellants.

 

 

 

JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS APPEALS

 

 

 

Appellants Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc., Fairchild Semiconductor
Corporation, and Fairchild (Taiwan) Corporation and cross-appellant Power
Integrations, Inc. respectfully request under Federal Rule of Appellate
Procedure 42(b) that the Court dismiss these appeals. The parties have agreed
that each side will bear its own costs associated with the appeals.

Neither Party is waiving any argument or position (now or in the future) that
any order, ruling, or judgment that is currently the subject of the present
appeal and cross-appeal was in error.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: October _, 2019    Respectfully submitted, s/    s/ KATHLEEN M. SULLIVAN
   FRANK SCHERKENBACH QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &    FISH & RICHARDSON, PC
SULLIVAN, LLP    One Marina Park Drive 51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor    Boston,
MA 02210 New York, NY 10010    Telephone: (617) 542-5070 Telephone: (212)
849-7000       MICHAEL R. HEADLEY FELIPE CORREDOR    HOWARD G. POLLACK KEVIN
ALEXANDER SMITH    FISH & RICHARDSON, PC QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &    500
Arguello Street SULLIVAN, LLP    Redwood City, CA 94063 50 California Street,
22nd Floor    Telephone: (650) 839-5070 San Francisco, CA 94111    Telephone:
(415) 875-6600    JOHN WINSTON THORNBURGH    FISH & RICHARDSON, PC    12390 El
Camino Real    San Diego, CA 921303    Telephone: (858) 678-5070 Counsel for
Defendants-Appellants Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc., Fairchild
Semiconductor Corporation, and Fairchild (Taiwan) Corporation    Counsel for
Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant Power Integrations, Inc.

 

2

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CERTIFICATE OF INTEREST

Counsel for plaintiff-cross-appellant Power Integrations, Inc. certify the
following:

1.      The full name of every party or amicus represented by me is:

Power Integrations, Inc.

2.      The name of the Real Party in interest (Please only include any real
party in interest NOT identified in Question 3) represented by me is:

None

3.      All parent corporations and any publicly held companies that own 10% or
more of the stock of the party or amicus curiae represented by me are:

BlackRock, Inc.

4.      The names of all law firms and the partners or associates that appeared
for the party or amicus now represented by me in the trial court or agency or
are expected to appear in this court (and who have not or will not enter an
appearance in this case) are:

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.: Frank E. Scherkenbach, Howard G. Pollack, Michael R.
Headley, Neil Warren, John Thornburgh, Douglas E. Mccann, James Huguenin-Love,
Joseph B. Warden, Craig E. Countryman*, William J. Marsden*, Keeley I. Vega*,
Kyle Wagner Compton*, Scott A. Penner*.

*No longer with firm

5.      The title and number of any case known to counsel to be pending in this
or any other court or agency that will directly affect or be directly affected
by this court’s decision in the pending appeal:

 

None

     

Dated: October _, 2019

  

/s/      

     

    [NAME]

  

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CERTIFICATE OF INTEREST

Counsel for defendants-appellants Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc.,
Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation, and Fairchild (Taiwan) Corporation certify
the following:

1.      The full name of every party or amicus represented by me is:

Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc.; Fairchild Semiconductor Corp.; and
Fairchild (Taiwan) Corp.

2.      The name of the Real Party in interest (Please only include any real
party in interest NOT identified in Question 3) represented by me is:

N/A

3.      All parent corporations and any publicly held companies that own 10% or
more of the stock of the party or amicus curiae represented by me are:

Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation, Fairchild Semiconductor International,
Inc., and Fairchild (Taiwan) Corp. are 100% owned direct or indirect
subsidiaries of ON Semiconductor Corporation. Except for ON Semiconductor
Corporation, none of the foregoing entities or any other direct or indirect
subsidiary of ON Semiconductor Corporation is publicly traded.

4.      The names of all law firms and the partners or associates that appeared
for the party or amicus now represented by me in the trial court or agency or
are expected to appear in this court (and who have not or will not enter an
appearance in this case) are:

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP: Kathleen M. Sullivan, Kevin A. Smith,
Felipe Corredor, Lance Yang, Patrick Stafford, John (Jay) M. Neukom*

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP: Erik J. Olson, Colette Reiner Mayer, Scott F.
Llewellyn, Esther Chang, Thomas J. Pardini

ASHBY & GEDDES, P.A.: John G. Day, Andrew Colin Mayo, Tiffany Geyer Lydon,
Lauren E. Maguire*, Caroline Hong*

PAUL HASTINGS LLP: Blair M. Jacobs, Christina A. Ondrick

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BAKER BOTTS LLP: Roger J. Fulghum, Brett J. Thompsen, George Hopkins Guy, III

MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP: Leigh J. Martinson*, Michael F. Martin*, Rose S.
Whelan*

ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP: Bas de Blank, Diana M. Rutowski, Vicki L.
Feeman, Ulysses Hui*

ON SEMICONDUCTOR CORP.: Joshua Engel

* Attorneys no longer with designated firms.

5.      The title and number of any case known to counsel to be pending in this
or any other court or agency that will directly affect or be directly affected
by this court’s decision in the pending appeal:

Fairchild Semiconductor Corp. v. Power Integrations, Inc., No. 19-2378 (Fed.
Cir.).

 

Dated:  October _, 2019

 

                

  

/s/ Kathleen M. Sullivan        

    

    Kathleen M. Sullivan

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

This motion complies with the type-volume limitations in Federal Rules of
Appellate Procedure 27 and 32 because it contains __ words.

 

 

 

 

Dated: October _, 2019

  

  /s/

  

  [NAME]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the
Court for the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit by using
the CM/ECF system on October _, 2019.

I certify that all participants in the case are registered CM/ECF users and that
service will be accomplished by the CM/ECF system.

 

 

 

Dated: October _, 2019

  

/s/

  

 

  

[NAME]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

EXHIBIT K

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Nos. 19-2378, 20-1003

 

 

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

 

 

FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

and FAIRCHILD (TAIWAN) CORPORATION,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,                   

v.

POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.,

Defendant-Cross-Appellant.        

 

 

 

JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS APPEALS

 

 

 

Appellants Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation and Fairchild (Taiwan)
Corporation and cross-appellant Power Integrations, Inc. respectfully request
under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b) that the Court dismiss these
appeals. The parties have agreed that each side will bear its own costs
associated with the appeals.

Neither Party is waiving any argument or position (now or in the future) that
any order, ruling, or judgment that is currently the subject of the present
appeal and cross-appeal was in error.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: October _, 2019

  

Respectfully submitted,

s/

  

s/

MICHAEL HAWES    FRANK SCHERKENBACH ROGER FULGHUM   

FISH & RICHARDSON, PC

BAKER BOTTS, LLP

  

One Marina Park Drive

910 Louisiana Street

  

Boston, MA 02210

One Shell Plaza

  

Telephone: (617) 542-5070

Houston, TX 77002

  

Telephone: (713) 229-1750

   MICHAEL R. HEADLEY    HOWARD G. POLLACK JEFFREY TA-HWA HAN    FISH &
RICHARDSON, PC BAKER BOTTS, LLP   

500 Arguello Street

Suite 1500

  

Redwood City, CA 94063

98 San Jacinto Boulevard

  

Telephone: (650) 839-5070

Austin, TX 78746-7568

  

Telephone: (512) 322-2629

   JOHN WINSTON THORNBURGH    FISH & RICHARDSON, PC   

12390 El Camino Real

  

San Diego, CA 921303

  

Telephone: (858) 678-5070

Counsel for Plaintiffs-Appellants Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation, and
Fairchild (Taiwan) Corporation   

Counsel for Defendant-Cross-Appellant

Power Integrations, Inc.

 

 

2

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CERTIFICATE OF INTEREST

Counsel for plaintiffs-appellants Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation and
Fairchild (Taiwan Corporation) certify the following:

1.        The full name of every party or amicus represented by me is:

Fairchild Semiconductor Corp.; Fairchild (Taiwan) Corporation

2.        The name of the Real Party in interest (Please only include any real
party in interest NOT identified in Question 3) represented by me is:

None

3.        All parent corporations and any publicly held companies that own 10%
or more of the stock of the party or amicus curiae represented by me are:

Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation and Fairchild (Taiwan) Corporation are
wholly-owned subsidiaries of Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc.
Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC. Semiconductor Components Industries,
LLC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of ON Semiconductor Corporation. There is no
parent corporation or publicly held company that owns 10% or more of the stock
in ON Semiconductor Corporation.

4.        The names of all law firms and the partners or associates that
appeared for the party or amicus now represented by me in the trial court or
agency or are expected to appear in this court (and who have not or will not
enter an appearance in this case) are:

John G. Day, Andrew Mayo, Lauren E. Maguire - Ashby & Geddes; Rose Whelan -
Cooley; Scott F. Llewellyn, Collette Reiner Mayer, Pieter S. de Ganon, Ryan J.
Gatzemeyer - Morrison & Foerster LLP; Blair Jacobs, Christina Ondrick, Yar
Chaikovsky, Robert Walters, Patrick Stafford, Charles Hawkins - Paul Hastings;
Jennifer Nall - Baker Botts LLP; Joshua Engel - ON Semiconductor; Jeremiah
Armstrong, Alexander Ott, Leigh Martinson, Michael Martin, Terrence McMahon -
McDermott, Will & Emery

5.        The title and number of any case known to counsel to be pending in
this or any other court or agency that will directly affect or be directly
affected by this court’s decision in the pending appeal:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CAFC 2019-2377 Power Integrations Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation;
ON Semiconductor Corporation, et al. v. Power Integrations, Inc., 1:17-0247 -
LPS (D. Del.); Power Integrations, Inc. v. ON Semiconductor Corporation, et al.,
5:16-06371 (N.D. Cal.)

 

Dated: October _, 2019

  

/s/ Michael Hawes                            

  

Michael Hawes

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CERTIFICATE OF INTEREST

Counsel for defendant-cross-appellant Power Integrations, Inc. certify the
following:

1.        The full name of every party or amicus represented by me is:

Power Integrations, Inc.

2.        The name of the Real Party in interest (Please only include any real
party in interest NOT identified in Question 3) represented by me is:

None

3.        All parent corporations and any publicly held companies that own 10%
or more of the stock of the party or amicus curiae represented by me are:

BlackRock, Inc.

4.        The names of all law firms and the partners or associates that
appeared for the party or amicus now represented by me in the trial court or
agency or are expected to appear in this court (and who have not or will not
enter an appearance in this case) are:

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.: Frank E. Scherkenbach, Howard G. Pollack, Michael R.
Headley, Neil Warren, John Thornburgh, Warren K. Mabey, Jr., Douglas E. Mccann,
Joseph Warden, James Huguenin-Love, William Marsden*, Limin Zheng*

*No longer with the firm

5.        The title and number of any case known to counsel to be pending in
this or any other court or agency that will directly affect or be directly
affected by this court’s decision in the pending appeal:

CAFC Appeal No. 18-1851

 

Dated: October _, 2019

  

/s/        

  

[NAME]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

This motion complies with the type-volume limitations in Federal Rules of
Appellate Procedure 27 and 32 because it contains __ words.

 

Dated: October _, 2019

  

 /s/

  

 [NAME]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the
Court for the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit by using
the CM/ECF system on October _, 2019.

I certify that all participants in the case are registered CM/ECF users and that
service will be accomplished by the CM/ECF system.

 

Dated: October _, 2019

  

/s/

  

 [NAME]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

EXHIBIT L

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

 

  FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION and FAIRCHILD (TAIWAN) CORPORATION,     
        Plaintiffs,        C.A. No. 12-540-LPS  

v.

     POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.     

        Defendant.

 

  

 

JOINT MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR

VOLUNTARY DIMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE [F.R.C.P. RULE 41(a)(2)]

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) and a settlement agreement,
the parties jointly move that this Court dismiss this action with prejudice,
with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.

Neither Party is waiving any argument or position (now or in the future) that
any order, ruling, or judgment was in error in any of the parties’ cases that is
being dismissed with or without prejudice in connection with the parties’
settlement agreement, including any arguments that were the subject of any
appeal dismissed pursuant to the parties’ settlement agreement.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ASHBY & GEDDES

    

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

/s/

 

    

  

/s/

John G. Day (#2403)

    

Douglas E. McCann (#3852)

Andrew C. Mayo (#5207)

    

Joseph B. Warden (#5401)

500 Delaware Avenue, 8th Floor

    

222 Delaware Ave, 17th Floor

P.O. Box 1150

    

Wilmington, DE 19801

Wilmington, DE 19899

    

(302) 652-5070

(302) 654-1888

    

DMcCann@fr.com

jday@ashbygeddes.com

    

Warden@fr.com

amayo@ashbygeddes.com

    

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

    

Attorneys for Defendant

Dated: October __, 2019

    

SO ORDERED this ____ day of _______________, 2019.

 

 

Chief Judge

 

2