Title: Mid-Hudson Val. Fed. Credit Union v Quartararo & Lois, PLLC

State: new-york

Issuer: New York Appellate Court

Document:

Mid-Hudson Val. Fed. Credit Union v Quartararo & Lois, PLLC

2018 NY Slip Op 04034

Decided on June 7, 2018

Court of Appeals

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on June 7, 2018

No. 108 SSM 9

[*1]Mid-Hudson Valley Federal Credit Union, Appellant,
vQuartararo & Lois, PLLC et al., Respondents.


Submitted by Kevin A. Luibrand, for appellant.
Submitted by Hillary J. Raimondi, for respondents.


On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order insofar as appealed from affirmed, with costs. The Appellate Division properly concluded that plaintiff Mid-Hudson Valley Federal Credit Union did not state a claim for legal malpractice against defendants Paul Quartararo and Quartararo & Lois, PLLC insofar as the amended complaint failed to allege facts "sufficiently particular to give the court and [defendants] notice of the transactions, occurrences, or series of transactions or occurrences, intended to be proved" (CPLR 3013). Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia, Wilson and Feinman concur.
Decided June 7, 2018