Title: Sate v. Gardiner et al.

State: delaware

Issuer: Delaware Supreme Court

Document:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
STATE OF DELAWARE, ex rel,
§
M. Jane Brady, Attorney General
§
No. 389, 2000
of the State of Delaware,
§
   
§
          Plaintiff Below,  
       §
Court Below: Superior  Court
of
          Appellant,
       §
the State of Delaware in and for
       §
New Castle County
v.
       §
       §
C.A. No.98C-02-135
ALFRED GARDINER, JR. and
§
MILFORD MOTORS, INC.,       
§
       §
          Defendants Below,      §
          Appellees.  
       §
Submitted: May 8, 2001
Decided:  
May 10, 2001
Before VEASEY, Chief Justice, WALSH and STEELE, Justices.
O R D E R
This 10th day of May 2001, the Court, having carefully considered the
decision and judgments of the Superior Court dated June 5, 2000 and July 11, 2000,
together with the briefs filed by the parties, has determined as follows:
 To the extent that:  (a) the issues raised on appeal are factual, the record
evidence supports the trial judge’s factual findings; (b) the errors alleged on appeal
are attributed to an abuse of discretion, the record does not support those assertions;
-2-
and (c) the issues raised on appeal are legal, they are controlled by settled Delaware
law, which was properly applied. 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior
Court is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ E. Norman Veasey                             
 Chief Justice