Title: Disciplinary Counsel v. Fisher

State: ohio

Issuer: Ohio Supreme Court

Document:

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Fisher, 102 Ohio St.3d 1224, 2004-Ohio-2836.] 
 
 
DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL V. FISHER. 
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Fisher, 102 Ohio St.3d 1224, 2004-Ohio-
2836.] 
Attorneys at law — Misconduct — Reciprocal discipline from the Maine Board of 
Overseers of the Bar Grievance Commission — Public reprimand — 
Gov.Bar R. V(11)(F)(4). 
(No.  2004-0549 — Submitted May 25, 2004 — Decided May 27, 2004.) 
ON CERTIFIED ORDER of the Maine Board of Overseers of the Bar Grievance 
Commission, No. 02-60. 
__________________ 
{¶1} 
This cause is pending before the Supreme Court of Ohio in 
accordance with the reciprocal discipline provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(11)(F). 
{¶2} 
On March 30, 2004, relator, Disciplinary Counsel, filed with this 
court a certified copy of a report of the Findings of Panel C of the Grievance 
Commission of the State of Maine entered August 7, 2003, in Board of Overseers 
of the Bar v. David N. Fisher Jr., Esq., case No. 02-60, publicly reprimanding 
respondent.  On April 2, 2004, this court ordered respondent to show cause why 
identical or comparable discipline should not be imposed in this state.  
Respondent filed no response to the show-cause order.  This cause was considered 
by the court, and on consideration thereof, 
{¶3} 
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED by this court that pursuant to 
Gov.Bar R. V(11)(F)(4), respondent, David N. Fisher Jr., Attorney Registration 
No. 0046028, last known address in Cincinnati, Ohio, be publicly reprimanded. 
{¶4} 
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, sua sponte, by the court, that within 
90 days of the date of this order, respondent shall reimburse any amounts that 
have been awarded against the respondent by the Clients’ Security Fund pursuant 
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 
2 
to Gov.Bar R. VIII(7)(F).  It is further ordered, sua sponte, by the court that if, 
after the date of this order, the Clients’ Security Fund awards any amount against 
the respondent pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VIII(7)(F), the respondent shall reimburse 
that amount to the Clients’ Security Fund within 90 days of the notice of such 
award. 
{¶5} 
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, sua sponte, that all documents filed 
with this court in this case shall meet the filing requirements set forth in the Rules 
of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio, including requirements as to form, 
number, and timeliness of filings. 
{¶6} 
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, sua sponte, that service shall be 
deemed made on respondent by sending this order, and all other orders in this 
case, by certified mail to the most recent address respondent has given to the 
Attorney Registration Section. 
{¶7} 
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue 
certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that 
publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that 
respondent bear the costs of publication. 
__________________ 
 
MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, 
O’CONNOR and O’DONNELL, JJ., concur. 
__________________