Title: Keybanc Capital Markets, Inc. v. Shandler, et al.

State: delaware

Issuer: Delaware Supreme Court

Document:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
KEYBANC CAPITAL MARKETS, § 
INC.,  
 
 
 
 
§ 
No. 545, 2010 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
§ 
 
Defendant Below,  
 
§ 
 
 
Appellant,  
 
 
§ 
Court Below—Court of   
 
 
 
 
 
 
§ 
Chancery of the State of   
 
v. 
 
 
 
 
§ 
Delaware 
 
 
 
 
 
 
§ 
CHAD J. SHANDLER, CREDITOR § 
TRUSTEE OF INSILCO  
 
§ 
TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 
 
§ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
§ 
 
Plaintiff Below, 
 
 
§ 
C.A. No. 4797 
 
Appellee. 
 
 
 
§ 
 
 
 
 
 
Submitted: September 3, 2010  
 
 
 
 
 
 
Decided: 
September 14, 2010 
 
Before BERGER, JACOBS and RIDGELY, Justices. 
 
O R D E R 
 
 
This 14th day of September 2010, it appears to the Court that: 
 
(1) 
Defendant Below/Appellant, Keybank Capital Markets, Inc., 
has petitioned this Court, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 42, to appeal from 
the Court of Chancery’s memorandum opinion of July 26, 2010 that, in 
pertinent part, denied the appellant’s motion to dismiss the aiding and 
abetting breach of fiduciary duty claim.  By order dated September 3, 2010, 
the Court of Chancery denied the appellant’s application for certification of 
the interlocutory appeal.  
 
2
 
(2) 
Applications for interlocutory review are addressed to the 
sound discretion of this Court and are granted only in exceptional 
circumstances.  We have examined the Court of Chancery’s July 26, 2010 
memorandum opinion according to the criteria set forth in Supreme Court 
Rule 42 and have concluded that exceptional circumstances as would merit 
review of the decision do not exist in this case. 
 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 
interlocutory appeal is REFUSED.     
 
 
 
 
 
 
BY THE COURT: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Jack B. Jacobs 
 
 
 
 
 
 
       Justice