Title: Wilson v. Haimerl

State: ohio

Issuer: Ohio Supreme Court

Document:

[Cite as Wilson v. Haimerl, 101 Ohio St.3d 1230, 2004-Ohio-736.] 
 
 
WILSON, APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT, v. HAIMERL ET AL.; UNIVERSAL 
UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE. 
[Cite as Wilson v. Haimerl, 101 Ohio St.3d 1230, 2004-Ohio-736.] 
Motion for reconsideration denied. 
(No. 2003-1744 — Submitted February 3, 2004 — Decided March 3, 2004.) 
APPEAL and CROSS-APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Madison County, No. 
CA2002-08-019, 2003-Ohio4334. 
ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION. 
__________________ 
{¶1} 
The motion for this court to reconsider its judgment entry in 
Wilson v. Haimerl, 100 Ohio St.3d 1544, 2003-Ohio-6879, 800 N.E.2d 750, is 
denied. 
 
MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, O’CONNOR and 
O’DONNELL, JJ., concur. 
 
LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., concurs separately. 
__________________ 
 
LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., concurring. 
{¶2} 
I concur with the decision to deny reconsideration.  However, as I 
stated in my concurring opinion in Fish v. Ohio Cas. Ins. Co., 101 Ohio St.3d 
1210, 2004-Ohio-224, 802 N.E.2d 149, I believe that Westfield Ins. Co. v. Galatis, 
100 Ohio St.3d 216, 2003-Ohio-5849, 797 N.E.2d 1256, applies to all pending 
cases where a claim has been raised under Scott-Pontzer v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. 
Co. (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 660, 710 N.E.2d 1116.  Here, the appellate court has 
remanded the claim against Universal Underwriters Insurance Company to the 
trial court for further proceedings.  These proceedings should include application 
of Galatis. 
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 
2 
__________________ 
 
Clark, Perdue, Roberts & Scott and Glen R. Pritchard, for appellee and 
cross-appellant. 
 
Buckley King, L.P.A., and Thomas I. Blackburn, for appellant and cross-
appellee. 
__________________