Title: Cedric Fraser v. Florida Department Of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles

State: florida

Issuer: Florida Supreme Court

Document:

Supreme Court of Florida
 
____________
No. SC95506
____________
CEDRIC FRASER,
Petitioner,
vs.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR
VEHICLES,
Respondent.
[March 22, 2001]
PER CURIAM
We initially accepted  review of the decision in Fraser v. Florida Department
of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, 727 So. 2d 1021 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999),
based on alleged express and direct conflict under article V, section 3(b)(3), of the
Florida Constitution.  Upon further consideration, we find that jurisdiction was
improvidently granted.  Accordingly, we hereby dismiss review of this case.
It is so ordered.
WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and
-2-
QUINCE, JJ., concur.
NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED.
Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal - 
Direct Conflict
Fourth District - Case No. 4D97-2256 
(Palm Beach County)
Carl H. Lida, Plantation, Florida,
for Petitioner
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Charles M. Fahlbusch, Assistant
Attorney General, Fort Lauderdale, Florida,
for Respondent
Katherine Fernandez Rundle, State Attorney, and Israel Reyes, Assistant State
Attorney, Miami, Florida; Law Office of Robert S. Glazier, Miami, Florida; and
Jonathan Goodman of Akerman, Senterfitt & Eidson, P.A., on behalf of the City of
Hollywood, Miami, Florida,
for the Office of the State Attorney in and for the Eleventh Judicial Circuit
of Florida, on behalf of the Members of the South Florida Impact 
Task Force, Amicus Curiae