Title: State ex rel. Ward v. Dorman Prods.

State: ohio

Issuer: Ohio Supreme Court

Document:

[Cite as State ex rel. Ward v. Dorman Prods., 111 Ohio St.3d 261, 2006-Ohio-5699.] 
1 
 
 
THE STATE EX REL. WARD, APPELLANT, v. DORMAN PRODUCTS ET AL., 
APPELLEES. 
[Cite as State ex rel. Ward v. Dorman Prods.,  
111 Ohio St.3d 261, 2006-Ohio-5699.] 
Workers’ compensation — Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. 
(No. 2005-2116 — Submitted September 19, 2006 — Decided  
November 15, 2006.) 
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County,  
No. 05AP-28, 2005-Ohio-5425. 
__________________ 
{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with 
the opinion of the court of appeals. 
 
MOYER, C.J., LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and 
LANZINGER, JJ., concur. 
 
RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent and would reverse the judgment of the 
court of appeals. 
__________________ 
 
Butkovich, Crosthwaite & Gast Co., L.P.A., and Joseph A. Butkovich, for 
appellant. 
 
Jim Petro, Attorney General, and Derrick L. Knapp, Assistant Attorney 
General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio. 
_______________________