Title: Hugo Miranda v. State of Florida

State: florida

Issuer: Florida Supreme Court

Document:

Supreme Court of Florida 
 
 
____________ 
 
No. SC14-888 
____________ 
 
HUGO MIRANDA,  
Petitioner, 
 
vs. 
 
STATE OF FLORIDA,  
Respondent. 
 
[January 14, 2016] 
 
PER CURIAM. 
 
We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the Third District 
Court of Appeal in State v. Miranda, 137 So. 3d 1133 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014), based 
on express and direct conflict.  See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.  After further 
consideration, we conclude that jurisdiction was improvidently granted.  
Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss this review proceeding.  
 
It is so ordered.   
LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, POLSTON, 
and PERRY, JJ., concur. 
 
NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED. 
 
 
 
- 2 - 
Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal - Direct 
Conflict of Decisions  
 
 
Third District - Case Nos. 3D12-269 & 3D12-270 
 
 
(Miami-Dade County) 
 
Carlos Jesus Martinez, Public Defender, and John Eddy Morrison, Assistant Public 
Defender, Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami, Florida, 
 
 
for Petitioner 
 
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida; Richard L. Polin, Bureau 
Chief, Douglas James Glaid, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Jonathan David 
Tanoos, Assistant Attorney General, and Jeffrey Robert Geldens, Assistant 
Attorney General, Miami, Florida, 
 
 
for Respondent