Title: Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Hartke

State: ohio

Issuer: Ohio Supreme Court

Document:

[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Hartke, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2013-Ohio-19.] 
 
 
CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. HARTKE. 
[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Hartke, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2013-Ohio-19.] 
(No. 2011-1774—Submitted January 7, 2013—Decided January 9, 2013.) 
ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. 
__________________ 
{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an 
application for reinstatement by respondent, James R. Hartke, Attorney 
Registration No. 0011584, last known business address in Cincinnati, Ohio. 
{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of June 6, 2012, 
wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a 
period of six months, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that 
order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). 
{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to 
the practice of law in the state of Ohio. 
{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies 
of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made 
as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of 
publication. 
O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, KENNEDY, 
FRENCH, and O’NEILL, JJ., concur. 
______________________