Title: Orlando Noa v. Florida Insurance Guaranty Association – Corrected Opinion

State: florida

Issuer: Florida Supreme Court

Document:

Supreme Court of Florida 
 
 
____________ 
 
No. SC17-738 
____________ 
 
ORLANDO NOA, 
Petitioner, 
 
vs. 
 
FLORIDA INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION, 
Respondent. 
 
[July 5, 2018] 
CORRECTED OPINION 
 
PER CURIAM. 
 
We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the Third District 
Court of Appeal in Noa v. Florida Insurance Guaranty Ass’n, 215 So. 3d 141 (Fla. 
3d DCA 2017), based on express and direct conflict.  See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. 
Const.  After further consideration, we conclude that jurisdiction was 
improvidently granted.  Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss 
this review proceeding. 
 
It is so ordered. 
CANADY, C.J., and PARIENTE, QUINCE, POLSTON, LABARGA, and 
LAWSON, JJ., concur. 
LEWIS, J., dissents. 
 
 
- 2 - 
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, 
IF FILED, DETERMINED. 
 
Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal – Direct 
Conflict of Decisions  
 
 
Third District - Case No. 3D16-1367 
 
 
(Miami-Dade County) 
 
Paul B. Feltman of Alvarez, Feltman & DaSilva, P.L., Coral Gables, Florida, 
 
 
for Petitioner 
 
Hinda Klein of Conroy Simberg, Hollywood, Florida,   
 
 
for Respondent