Title: State v. Flah

State: north-dakota

Issuer: North Dakota Supreme Court

Document:

State v. Flah  Court Description: A district court judgment of conviction for possession of drug paraphernalia after a jury trial is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2013 ND 22 State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Kawo Flah, Defendant and Appellant No. 20120357 Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce A. Romanick, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Dawn Marie Deitz, Assistant State's Attorney, 514 East Thayer Avenue, Bismarck, ND 58501, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief. Benjamin C. Pulkrabek, 402 1st Street NW, Mandan, ND 58554-3118, for defendant and appellant. State v. FlahNo. 20120357 Per Curiam. [¶1] Kawo Flah appeals a district court judgment of conviction for possession of drug paraphernalia after a jury trial. Flah argues the prosecutor improperly vouched for the truth and veracity of the testimony of two police officers. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). State v. Clark, 2004 ND 85, ¶ 9, 678 N.W.2d 765 (a prosecutor's closing argument may properly draw reasonable conclusions and argue permissible inferences from the evidence). [¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Mary Muehlen Maring Carol Ronning Kapsner Dale V. Sandstrom