Title: State of Florida v. Roger Carl Moline

State: florida

Issuer: Florida Supreme Court

Document:

Supreme Court of Florida 
 
 
____________ 
 
No. SC06-482 
____________ 
 
STATE OF FLORIDA, 
Petitioner, 
 
vs. 
 
ROGER CARL MOLINE, 
Respondent. 
 
[February 21, 2008] 
 
PER CURIAM. 
 
We have for review Moline v. State, 31 Fla. L. Weekly D701 (Fla. 1st DCA 
Mar. 3, 2006), in which the First District Court of Appeal certified conflict with 
Galindez v. State, 910 So. 2d 284 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005), approved, 955 So. 2d 517 
(Fla. 2007).  We have jurisdiction.  See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. 
     
We stayed proceedings in this case pending disposition of Galindez, which 
we ultimately decided on harmless error grounds based on a thorough review of the 
record.  See Galindez v. State, 955 So. 2d 517 (Fla. 2007).  We thereafter issued an 
order directing petitioner to show cause why our Galindez decision should not 
control the outcome of the present case.  However, petitioner’s response and 
 
- 2 - 
respondent’s reply thereto do not contain enough information or record 
attachments for us to perform a Galindez harmless error analysis.  Moreover, we 
cannot unilaterally perform such an analysis, as the record is not before this Court. 
     
We accordingly grant the petition for review in the present case.  The 
decision under review is quashed and this matter is remanded to the First District 
Court for application of a harmless error analysis based on our decision in 
Galindez and a thorough review of the record. 
    
 It is so ordered. 
LEWIS, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANTERO, and 
BELL, JJ., concur. 
 
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION, AND 
IF FILED, DETERMINED. 
 
 
Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal - Certified 
Direct Conflict of Decisions 
 
 
First District - Case No. 1D05-2815 
 
 
(Clay County) 
 
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Giselle Lylen Rivera, Assistant Attorney 
General, Tallahassee, Florida, 
 
 
for Petitioner 
 
Roger Carl Moline, Pro se, Bushnell, Florida 
 
 
for Respondent