Title: Neal Flomenbaum v. New York University

State: new-york

Issuer: New York Appellate Court

Document:

- 1 -
=================================================================
This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before
publication in the New York Reports.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
No. 167  SSM 21
Neal Flomenbaum,
            Appellant,
        v.
New York University,
            Respondent.
Submitted by Barry G. Felder, for appellant.
Submitted by Nancy A. Kilson, for respondent.
MEMORANDUM:
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed
with costs.  Plaintiff failed to present sufficient evidence to
raise a triable issue of fact regarding whether defendant New
York University breached the parties' underlying contract
(Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 560 [1980]). 
Plaintiff's remaining contentions lack merit.
- 2 -
SSM No. 21
- 2 -
*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules,
order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.  Chief Judge Lippman
and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones
concur.
Decided June 3, 2010