Title: State v. Thom

State: ohio

Issuer: Ohio Supreme Court

Document:

OPINIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO                               
    The full texts of the opinions of the Supreme Court of Ohio                  
are being transmitted electronically beginning May 27, 1992,                     
pursuant to a pilot project implemented by Chief Justice Thomas                  
J. Moyer.                                                                        
    Please call any errors to the attention of the Reporter's                    
Office of the Supreme Court of Ohio.  Attention:  Walter S.                      
Kobalka, Reporter, or Deborah J. Barrett, Administrative                         
Assistant.  Tel.:  (614) 466-4961; in Ohio 1-800-826-9010.                       
Your comments on this pilot project are also welcome.                            
    NOTE:  Corrections may be made by the Supreme Court to the                   
full texts of the opinions after they have been released                         
electronically to the public.  The reader is therefore advised                   
to check the bound volumes of Ohio St.3d published by West                       
Publishing Company for the final versions of these opinions.                     
The advance sheets to Ohio St.3d will also contain the volume                    
and page numbers where the opinions will be found in the bound                   
volumes of the Ohio Official Reports.                                            
                                                                                 
The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Thom, Appellant.                                 
[Cite as State v. Thom (1993),     Ohio St.3d    .]                              
Motor vehicles -- Driving while intoxicated -- Ohio Adm.Code                     
    3701-53-02(C)(2) does not require a new radio frequency                      
    interference survey when the breath-testing device is moved                  
    for repairs and is returned to its original testing                          
    location.                                                                    
    (No. 93-307 -- Submitted September 28, 1993 -- Decided                       
November 10, 1993.)                                                              
    Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Seneca County, No.                      
13-92-20.                                                                        
                                                                                 
    Richard A. Kahler, for appellant.                                            
                                                                                 
    The motion to certify the record is allowed and the cause                    
is affirmed on authority of State v. Yoder (1993), 66 Ohio                       
St.3d 515, 613 N.E.2d 626.                                                       
    Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright,  Resnick, F.E.                   
Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.