Title: State ex rel. Rutledge v. Indus. Comm.

State: ohio

Issuer: Ohio Supreme Court

Document:

[Cite as State ex rel. Rutledge v. Indus. Comm., 97 Ohio St.3d 196, 2002-Ohio-5783.] 
1 
 
 
THE STATE EX REL. RUTLEDGE, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF 
OHIO, APPELLEE, ET AL. 
[Cite as State ex rel. Rutledge v. Indus. Comm., 97 Ohio St.3d 196, 2002-Ohio-
5783.] 
Workers’ compensation — Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. 
(No. 2002-0346 — Submitted September 17, 2002 — Decided November 6, 
2002.) 
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 01AP-498. 
__________________ 
{¶1} 
The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with 
the opinion of the court of appeals. 
 
MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. 
 
DOUGLAS, J., dissents. 
 
RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent, would reverse the judgment of 
the court of appeals, and would order relief pursuant to State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm 
(1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666. 
__________________ 
 
Butkovich, Schimpf, Schimpf & Ginocchio Co., L.P.A., and Robert E. 
Hof, for appellant. 
 
Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Erica L. Bass, Assistant 
Attorney General, for appellee. 
__________________