Title: Anthony J. Ferayorni v. Hyundai Motor Co.

State: florida

Issuer: Florida Supreme Court

Document:

Supreme 
Court 
of 
Florida
 
____________
No. SC01-2528
____________
ANTHONY J. FERAYORNI, etc.,
Petitioner,
vs.
HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY, et al.,
Respondents.
[May 23, 2002]
CORRECTED OPINION
PER CURIAM.
We have for review the decision in Hyundai Motor Co. v. Ferayorni, 795 So.
2d 126 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), which certified conflict with the Third District Court
of Appeal’s decision in Nash v. General Motors Corp., 734 So. 2d 437 (Fla. 3d
DCA 1999).  Subsequently, we approved, in part, the Third District’s decision in
Nash.  See D’Amario v. Ford Motor Co., 806 So. 2d 424, 442 (Fla. 2001).  On
March 19, 2002, we entered an order directing the parties to show cause why the
case should not be remanded for reconsideration in light of our decision in
-2-
D’Amario.
Upon review of the responses to the March 19, 2002, order, the Court has
determined that it should accept jurisdiction in this case and remand the case to the
district court for reconsideration in light of our opinion in D’Amario.  Accordingly,
review is granted, the Fourth District’s decision in this case is quashed, and this
matter is remanded for reconsideration in accordance with our decision in
D’Amario.  
It is so ordered.
SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
WELLS, C.J., dissents.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION, AND IF
FILED, DETERMINED.
Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal - Certified
Direct Conflict of Decisions
Fourth District - Case Nos. 4D00-643 & 4D00-980
(Broward County)
Thomas D. Lardin, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 
for Petitioner
Francis M. McDonald, Jr., Orlando, Florida,  and Wendy F. Lumish, Miami, Florida,
of Carlton Fields, P.A.; and Leslie G. Landau of McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen,
-3-
LLP, San Francisco, California, 
for Respondents