Title: Disciplinary Counsel v. Carson

State: ohio

Issuer: Ohio Supreme Court

Document:

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Carson, 94 Ohio St.3d 1207, 2001-Ohio-7091.] 
1 
 
 
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. CARSON. 
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Carson (2001), 94 Ohio St.3d 1207.] 
(No. 01-384 — Submitted and decided December 10, 2001.) 
ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. 
__________________ 
 
This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application 
for reinstatement by respondent Edward Luke Carson, Attorney Registration No. 
0002642, last known business address in Girard, Ohio. 
 
The court coming now to consider its order of August 15, 2001, wherein the 
court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of two 
years with one year stayed and credit for time he had not practiced since May 8, 2000, 
finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions 
of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A).  Therefore, 
 
IT IS ORDERED by this court that Edward Luke Carson be and hereby is 
reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. 
 
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of 
this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as 
provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of 
publication. 
 
For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Carson (2001), 93 Ohio St.3d 
137, 753 N.E.2d 172. 
 
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and 
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. 
__________________