Title: Epperson v. State

State: delaware

Issuer: Delaware Supreme Court

Document:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
KEVIN EPPERSON, 
 
 
Defendant Below- 
Appellant, 
 
v. 
 
STATE OF DELAWARE, 
 
Plaintiff Below- 
Appellee. 
§ 
§ 
§  No. 230, 2007 
§ 
§ 
§  Court Below—Superior Court 
§  of the State of Delaware, 
§  in and for New Castle County 
§  Cr. ID 9408009291 
§   
§ 
 
Submitted: June 25, 2007 
Decided:  September 6, 2007 
 
Before STEELE, Chief Justice, HOLLAND, and RIDGELY, Justices. 
 
O R D E R 
 
This 6th day of September 2007, after careful consideration of appellant’s 
opening brief and the State’s motion to affirm, we find it manifest that the 
judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court=s well-
reasoned decision dated April 30, 2007. The trial court did not err in concluding 
that appellant’s eleventh motion for postconviction relief was both time-barred and 
repetitive and that appellant had failed to overcome these procedural hurdles.  
 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior 
Court is AFFIRMED. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
BY THE COURT: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Myron T. Steele 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Chief Justice