Title: Weninger v. Grzeskowiak

State: north-dakota

Issuer: North Dakota Supreme Court

Document:

Weninger v. Grzeskowiak Filed June 3, 2003[Download as WordPerfect]IN THE SUPREME COURTSTATE OF NORTH DAKOTA2003 ND 80 Rebecca Weninger, Petitioner and Appellee v. Peter John Grzeskowiak, Respondent and Appellant No. 20030009 Appeal from the District Court of Walsh County, Northeast Judicial District, the Honorable M. Richard Geiger, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Peter John Grzeskowiak (submitted on brief), pro se, 15750 Co. Rd. 15, Minto, N.D. 58261, respondent and appellant. Rebecca Weninger (no appearance), petitioner and appellee. Weninger v. Grzeskowiak No. 20030009 Per Curiam. [¶1] Peter Grzeskowiak appeals from the November 14, 2002, disorderly conduct restraining order issued against him, alleging that there was insufficient evidence to support issuance of the restraining order. [¶2] It is within the sound discretion of the trial court whether to grant a restraining order, and its decision will not be disturbed absent a clear abuse of discretion. See Wishnatsky v. Huey, 1997 ND 35, ¶ 8, 560 N.W.2d 878 . Grzeskowiak has not filed a transcript on appeal. "Failure to provide a transcript may prevent a party from being successful on appeal." Owan v. Kindel, 347 N.W.2d 577 , 579 (N.D. 1984). The partial record we have been provided is not adequate to establish a clear abuse of discretion. See State v. Clark, 2001 ND 194, ¶ 8, 636 N.W.2d 660 ("[T]he record on appeal does not allow us to properly determine whether the trial court abused its discretion . . . ."); In re C.J.C., 2000 ND 27, ¶ 8, 606 N.W.2d 117 ("The available record contains only fragmentary, incomplete information . . . . [and] does not reveal an abuse of discretion."). By not demonstrating an abuse of discretion, Grzeskowiak fails to carry his burden. See Clark, at ¶ 8. [¶3] We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). [¶4] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Mary Muehlen Maring William A. Neumann Dale V. Sandstrom Carol Ronning Kapsner