Title: State ex rel. Light v. Indus. Comm.

State: ohio

Issuer: Ohio Supreme Court

Document:

[Cite as State ex rel. Light v. Indus. Comm., 90 Ohio St.3d 522, 2001-Ohio-11.] 
1 
 
 
THE STATE EX REL. LIGHT, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, 
APPELLEE. 
[Cite as State ex rel. Light v. Indus. Comm. (2001), 90 Ohio St.3d 522.] 
Workers’ compensation — Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. 
(No. 00-677 — Submitted November 14, 2000 — Decided January 10, 2001.) 
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 99AP-722. 
__________________ 
 
The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the 
opinion of the court of appeals. 
 
MOYER, C.J., F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, 
JJ., concur. 
 
DOUGLAS and RESNICK, JJ., dissent. 
__________________ 
 
ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J., dissenting.  I would reverse the judgment of 
the court of appeals and return the cause to the Industrial Commission for relief 
consistent with State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 
666. 
 
DOUGLAS, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion. 
__________________ 
 
Butkovich, Schimpf, Schimpf & Ginocchio Co., L.P.A., and James A. 
Whittaker, for appellant. 
 
Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Thomas L. Reitz, Assistant 
Attorney General, for appellee. 
__________________