Title: Franklin W. Nooe v. State Of Florida

State: florida

Issuer: Florida Supreme Court

Document:

Supreme Court of Florida 
 
 
_____________ 
 
No. SC05-514 
_____________ 
 
 
FRANKLIN W. NOOE, 
Petitioner, 
 
vs. 
 
STATE OF FLORIDA, 
Respondent. 
 
[May 4, 2006] 
 
PER CURIAM. 
 
We originally accepted jurisdiction to review Nooe v. State, 892 So. 2d 1135 
(Fla. 5th DCA 2005), pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3) of the Florida 
Constitution.  Upon further consideration, we have determined that jurisdiction 
was improvidently granted because State v. Diaz, 814 So. 2d 466 (Fla. 3d DCA 
2002), was decided on the issue of the statute of limitations pursuant to section 
812.035(10), Florida Statutes (1995), and the present case was decided on the basis 
of the aggregation provision in section 812.012(9)(c),1 Florida Statutes (2001).  
                                          
 
1.  This provision was renumbered to be section 812.012(10)(c) in 2005. 
 
 
- 2 -
Accordingly, express and direct conflict does not exist, and this review proceeding 
is hereby dismissed. 
 
It is so ordered. 
PARIENTE, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, 
JJ., concur. 
LEWIS, J., dissents. 
 
NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED. 
 
 
Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal - Direct 
Conflict 
 
 
Fifth District - Case No. 5D03-2658 
 
 
(Volusia County) 
 
Michael H. Lambert, Daytona Beach, Florida 
 
 
for Petitioner 
 
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, Barbara C. Davis, 
Douglas T. Squire, and Kellie A. Nielan, Assistant Attorneys General, Daytona 
Beach, Florida, 
 
 
for Respondent