Title: People v Mingo

State: new-york

Issuer: New York Appellate Court

Document:

People v Mingo


2007 NY Slip Op 07743 [9 NY3d 938]


October 16, 2007


Court of Appeals


Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.


As corrected through Wednesday, November 21, 2007



[*1]
The People of the State of New York, Respondent,vJohn Mingo, Appellant.Decided October 16, 2007



People v Mingo, 37 AD3d 854, affirmed.



APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL


Appellate Advocates, New York City (Lynn W.L. Fahey of counsel), for appellant.
Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York City (Fay Ng of counsel), for respondent.

{**9 NY3d at 938} OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed. The Appellate Division, having affirmed without opinion, may have done so on the basis that the sentence imposed was not excessive, an issue beyond this Court's review.
Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.

.