Title: Express Scripts, Inc. v. Crawford, et al.

State: delaware

Issuer: Delaware Supreme Court

Document:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC., a   
§  
Delaware corporation, and KEW 
§   No. 113, 2007 
CORP., a Delaware corporation, 
§  
 
 
 
 
 
 
§   Court Below – Court of Chancery 
 
Plaintiffs Below,  
 
§   of the State of Delaware, 
 
Appellants,  
 
 
§   in and for New Castle County 
 
 
 
 
 
 
§   C.A. No. 2663-N 
 
v. 
 
 
 
 
§  
 
 
 
 
 
 
§  
EDWIN M. CRAWFORD, EDWIN §  
M. BANKS, C. DAVID BROWN, 
§  
II, COLLEEN CONWAY-WELCH, §  
HARRIS DIAMOND, KRISTEN E.  §  
GIBNEY WILLIAMS, EDWARD L. §  
HARDIN, JR., ROGER L.  
 
§  
HEADRICK, JEAN-PIERRE   
§  
MILLON, C.A. LANCE PICCOLO, §  
MICHAEL D. WARE, CAREMARK §  
RX INC., a Delaware corporation, 
§  
CVS CORPORATION, a Delaware 
§  
corporation, and ADVANCEPCS,  
§  
a Delaware corporation,  
 
§  
 
 
 
 
 
 
§  
 
Defendants Below, 
 
 
§  
 
Appellees.  
 
 
§  
 
 
 
 
 
    Submitted:  March 8, 2007 
 
 
 
 
       Decided:  March 9, 2007 
 
Before STEELE, Chief Justice, HOLLAND and JACOBS, Justices. 
 
O R D E R 
 
 
This 9th day of March 2007, it appears to the Court that: 
1) 
Express Scripts, Inc. and KEW Corp. have petitioned this Court 
to accept an appeal from an interlocutory order of the Court of Chancery in 
C.A. No. 2663-N, issued on February 23, 2007, denying in part and granting 
in part Express Scripts’ Motion for a Preliminary Injunction. 
2) 
The Court of Chancery held a teleconference with the parties on 
March 7, 2007 and declined to certify an interlocutory appeal.   
3) 
This Court has considered the interlocutory order by the Court 
of Chancery, the transcribed oral ruling of the Court of Chancery declining 
to certify its February 23, 2007, decision for interlocutory review, and the 
submissions to this Court by the parties.   
 
4) 
Applications for interlocutory review are addressed to the 
sound discretion of this Court and are accepted only in extraordinary 
circumstances.   
5) 
In the exercise of its discretion, this Court has concluded that 
this application for interlocutory review should be refused.   
 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 
application for interlocutory review in this matter be, and the same is hereby, 
REFUSED. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
BY THE COURT: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Randy J. Holland 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Justice