Title: THOMAS AVERY GLENN, v. THE STATE OF WYOMING

State: wyoming

Issuer: Wyoming Supreme Court

Document:

THOMAS AVERY GLENN, v. THE STATE OF WYOMING2011 WY 135Case Number: S-11-0132Decided: 09/21/2011NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in Pacific Reporter Third. Readers are requested to notify the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Supreme Court Building, Cheyenne, Wyoming 82002, of any typographical or other formal errors so correction may be made before final publication in the permanent volume.
April 
Term, A.D. 2011
 
THOMAS 
AVERY GLENN,Appellant (Defendant),v.THE STATE OF 
WYOMING,Appellee (Plaintiff).
 
 
Order Affirming the Judgment and Sentence 
of the District Court
 
[¶1]      This 
matter came 
before the Court upon its own motion following notification that appellant has 
not filed a pro se brief within the 
time allotted by this Court.  
Appellant pled “no contest” to three charges:  (1) criminal entry, a misdemeanor; (2) 
possession of marijuana, a third offense felony; and (3) felony interference 
with a peace officer.  The district 
court imposed concurrent sentences of 2 to 4 years on the felonies, with those 
sentences to be served concurrently to the misdemeanor sentence.  This is Appellant’s direct appeal from 
those convictions.  On July 6, 2011, 
Appellant’s court-appointed appellate counsel filed a “Motion to Withdraw as 
Counsel,” pursuant to Anders v. 
California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 
(1967).  Following a careful review 
of the record and the “Anders brief” 
submitted by counsel, this Court, on July 25, 2011, entered its “Order Granting 
Permission for Court Appointed Counsel to Withdraw.”  That Order notified Appellant that the 
District Court’s April 7, 2011, “Judgment and Sentence” would be affirmed 
unless, on or before September 12, 2011, Appellant filed a brief that persuaded 
this Court that the captioned appeal is not wholly frivolous.  Taking note that Appellant, Thomas Avery 
Glenn, has not filed a brief or other pleading within the time allotted, the 
Court finds that the district court’s “Judgment and Sentence” should be 
affirmed.  It is, therefore, 

 
[¶2]      ORDERED 
that the 
District Court’s April 7, 2011 “Judgment and Sentence” be, and the same hereby 
is, affirmed.
 
[¶3]      DATED this 21st day of September, 
2011.
                                                

 
                                                                        
BY THE 
COURT:
                                                
                 
                                                                        
/s/
 
                                                                        
MARILYN S. KITE
                                                                        
Chief Justice