Title: State ex rel. Unthank v. Holland Motor Express, Inc.

State: ohio

Issuer: Ohio Supreme Court

Document:

[Cite as State ex rel. Unthank v. Holland Motor Express, Inc., 97 Ohio St.3d 181, 2002-Ohio-
5785.] 
1 
 
 
THE STATE EX REL. UNTHANK, APPELLANT, v. HOLLAND MOTOR EXPRESS, INC. 
ET AL., APPELLEES. 
[Cite as State ex rel. Unthank v. Holland Motor Express, Inc., 97 Ohio St.3d 
181, 2002-Ohio-5785.] 
Workers’ compensation — Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. 
(No. 2001-1459 — Submitted September 17, 2002 — Decided November 6, 
2002.) 
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 00AP-1251. 
__________________ 
{¶1} 
The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with 
the opinion of the court of appeals. 
 
MOYER, C.J., F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, 
JJ., concur. 
 
DOUGLAS, J., dissents. 
 
RESNICK, J., dissents, would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals, 
and would order relief pursuant to State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm (1994), 68 Ohio 
St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666. 
__________________ 
 
Clements, Mahin & Cohen, L.L.P., and Lane N. Cohen, for appellant. 
 
Schottenstein, Zox & Dunn Co., L.P.A., and Corey V. Crognale, for 
appellee Holland Motor Express, Inc. 
 
Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Gerald H. Waterman, 
Assistant Attorney General, for appellees Industrial Commission of Ohio and 
Administrator, Bureau of Workers’ Compensation. 
__________________