Title: J. Patrick Swett v. State of Florida

State: florida

Issuer: Florida Supreme Court

Document:

Supreme Court of Florida
____________
No. SC01-1
____________
J. PATRICK SWETT,
Petitioner,
vs.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent.
[October 10, 2002]
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted review of the decision in State v. Swett, 772 So. 2d 48
(Fla. 5th DCA 2000), based on alleged express and direct conflict with Frazier v.
State, 766 So. 2d 459 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), and Daniels v. State, 568 So. 2d 63
(Fla. 1st DCA 1990).  Upon further consideration, we find that jurisdiction was
improvidently granted.  Accordingly, we hereby dismiss this case.
It is so ordered.
ANSTEAD, C.J., SHAW, WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., and
HARDING, Senior Justice, concur.
-2-
NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED.
Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal - Direct
Conflict
Fifth District - Case No. 5D00-84 
(Orange County)
Terrence E. Kehoe and Donald R. West, Orlando, Florida,
for Petitioner
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant
Attorney General, Daytona Beach, Florida,
for Respondent