Title: State ex rel. Hobart Corp./PMI Food Equip. Group v. Indus. Comm.

State: ohio

Issuer: Ohio Supreme Court

Document:

[Cite as State ex rel. Hobart Corp./PMI Food Equip. Group v. Indus. Comm., 93 Ohio St.3d 
189, 2001-Ohio-1324] 
1 
 
 
THE STATE EX REL. HOBART CORPORATION/PMI FOOD EQUIPMENT GROUP, 
APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES. 
[Cite as State ex rel. Hobart Corp./PMI Food Equip. Group v. Indus. Comm. 
(2001), 93 Ohio St.3d 189.] 
Workers’ compensation — Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. 
(No. 01-256 — Submitted July 17, 2001 — Decided September 19, 2001.) 
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 00AP-511. 
__________________ 
 
The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion 
of the court of appeals. 
__________________ 
 
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., 
concur. 
 
LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents. 
__________________ 
 
LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissenting.  I dissent and would grant the 
requested writ of mandamus and return the matter to the Industrial Commission for 
reconsideration.  Therefore, I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. 
__________________ 
 
Baran, Piper, Tarkowsky, Fitzgerald & Theis Co., L.P.A., and John 
Tarkowsky, for appellant. 
 
Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Jeffrey B. Hartranft, Assistant 
Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission. 
 
Philip J. Fulton & Associates and William A. Thorman III, for appellee 
Douglas E. Moerch. 
__________________