Title: Disciplinary Counsel v. Sopkovich

State: ohio

Issuer: Ohio Supreme Court

Document:

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Sopkovich, 101 Ohio St.3d 1212, 2004-Ohio-414.] 
1 
 
 
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. SOPKOVICH. 
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Sopkovich, 101 Ohio St.3d 1212, 2004-Ohio-
414.] 
(No. 1995-1199 — Submitted January 12, 2004 — Decided January 13, 2004.) 
ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. 
__________________ 
{¶1} 
This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an 
application for reinstatement by respondent, Carol A. Sopkovich, Attorney 
Registration No. 0016795, last known business address in Girard, Ohio. 
{¶2} 
The court coming now to consider its order of March 5, 1996, 
wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a 
period of two years with one year stayed on condition, finds that respondent has 
substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. 
V(10)(A).  Therefore, 
{¶3} 
IT IS ORDERED by this court that respondent be and hereby is 
reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. 
{¶4} 
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue 
certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that 
publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that 
respondent bear the costs of publication. 
{¶5} 
For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Sopkovich (1996), 75 
Ohio St.3d 192, 661 N.E.2d 1066. 
 
MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, 
O’CONNOR and O’DONNELL, JJ., concur.