Title: Alfonzo Hendrix v. Honorable Randall Wright, Jr., Circuit Judge

State: arkansas

Issuer: Arkansas Supreme Court

Document:

1The record filed in this court shows that the pertinent pleadings are: a civil complaint filed on August 10, 2006; an amended complaint filed on September 25, 2007; a motion for evidentiary hearing filed on November 20, 2007; motions for default judgment filed on November 3, 2006, November 20, 2007, and December 5, 2007; a petition for declaratory judgment filed on October 18, 2007; a motion for appointment of counsel filed on September 25, 2007; a request for a ruling filed on January 8, 2008. ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT No. 08-309 ALFONZO HENDRIX Petitioner v. RANDALL WRIGHT, JR., CIRCUIT JUDGE Respondent Opinion Delivered April 24, 2008 PRO SE PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS [CIRCUIT COURT OF NEVADA COUNTY, CV 2006-67] PETITION MOOT. PER CURIAM On March 10, 2008, petitioner Alfonzo Hendrix filed in this court a pro se petition for writ of mandamus. There is no specific prayer for relief in the petition. But the caption of the pleading refers to exhibits to the petition as an “appendix of unresponded to motions” and the “certificate of authenticity” generally seeks an adjudication of the pleadings attached as exhibits. It appears that petitioner filed a civil lawsuit and multiple related motions1 in the circuit court that pertain to petitioner’s criminal conviction. In response to the petition for writ of mandamus, the Attorney General noted that the circuit court entered an order on March 19, 2008, that disposed of all the pending motions, and ordered that a hearing date be set on petitioner’s civil complaint. As the court has acted on the motions, and will set a hearing date for the complaint, the petition for writ of mandamus is moot. Petition moot. Gunter, J., not participating.