Title: Bollar v. Eberlin

State: ohio

Issuer: Ohio Supreme Court

Document:

[Cite as Bollar v. Eberlin, 121 Ohio St.3d 3, 2009-Ohio-258.] 
 
 
BOLLAR, APPELLANT, v. EBERLIN, WARDEN, APPELLEE. 
[Cite as Bollar v. Eberlin, 121 Ohio St.3d 3, 2009-Ohio-258.] 
Appeal from dismissal of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus – Adequate 
remedy at law available – Judgment affirmed. 
(No. 2008-1890 — Submitted January 14, 2009 — Decided January 28, 2009.) 
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Belmont County, No. 08 BE 5. 
__________________ 
 
Per Curiam. 
{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the 
petition of appellant, Gregory Earl Bollar, for a writ of habeas corpus, because he 
failed to attach all the commitment papers pertinent to his claim challenging the 
Ohio Adult Parole Authority’s multiple revocations of his parole and extensions 
of his release date based on R.C. 2967.15(C)(1).  See State ex rel. Bray v. Brigano 
(2001), 93 Ohio St.3d 458, 459, 755 N.E.2d 891, and Tucker v. McAninch (1998), 
82 Ohio St.3d 423, 696 N.E.2d 595. 
{¶ 2} Notwithstanding Bollar’s assertions to the contrary, those papers 
were material to his claim. 
Judgment affirmed. 
MOYER, 
C.J., 
and 
PFEIFER, 
LUNDBERG 
STRATTON, 
O’CONNOR, 
O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur. 
__________________ 
 
Gregory Earl Bollar, pro se. 
 
Richard Cordray, Attorney General, and Jerri L. Fosnaught, Assistant 
Attorney General, for appellee. 
______________________