Title: Bhakta v. County of Maui

State: hawaii

Issuer: Hawaii Supreme Court

Document:

LAW LIBRARY

No, 24780

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAT'T

 

SYOTSNA BHAKTA, Individually and as Personal Representative
‘of the Estate of MITESH BHAKTA, Deceased; NIKHIL BHAKTA,
a minor, by his Next Priend, CANDACE TURNER; DEWAL SHAH,

Individually and as Personal Representative of the
Restate of MEGHAL SHAH, Deceased; DAKA BHAKTA, Individually
‘and as Personal Representative of the Estate of
BHUPENDRA BHAKTA, Deceased; CATHY M. ARENDS, Individually
‘and as Personal Representative of the Estate of

DONALD ARENDS, Deceased, Plaintiffs-Appellante,

vs. R
COUNTY OF MAUI, STATE OF HAWAI'I, == S30
Defendants-Appellees, 8s =F
4 > om
and 2 6

JOHN DOES 1-5, JOHN DOE CORPORATIONS 1-5, JOHH DOE S
PARTNERSHIPS 1-5, ROE NON-PROFIT CORPORATIONS 1-5,
‘and ROE GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES 1-5, Defendants.

 

opp op THe courr,

(py: Levingon, J., for the court')

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the last sentence of section

III.B.1, on page 24 of this court’s opinion, filed in the above-

captioned matter on December 13, 2005, is amended as follows

(deleted language is bracketed and stricken; new language is

underscored) +
ft 7] Consequently, the
validity of COL No. 101 need not be addressed
inasmuch as it was rendered on the assumption that
Act 190 is an affirmative defense.

 

 

considered by: Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, JJ.

“ae
‘The Clerk of the Court is directed to incorporate the

 

foregoing changes in the original opinion and take all nece:

steps to notify the publishing agencies of these changes.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, pecember 30, 2005.
oe
iE Q

wea ie comes
MacRae

\a 5
Associate sutice Veg, ys)

 

<> Order amending

No. 24700
‘the Opinion of the Couxt, filed Decesber 13, 2005