Title: State v. Brady

State: ohio

Issuer: Ohio Supreme Court

Document:

OPINIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO                               
     The full texts of the opinions of the Supreme Court of                      
Ohio are being transmitted electronically beginning May 27,                      
1992, pursuant to a pilot project implemented by Chief Justice                   
Thomas J. Moyer.                                                                 
     Please call any errors to the attention of the Reporter's                   
Office of the Supreme Court of Ohio.  Attention:  Walter S.                      
Kobalka, Reporter, or Deborah J. Barrett, Administrative                         
Assistant.  Tel.:  (614) 466-4961; in Ohio 1-800-826-9010.                       
Your comments on this pilot project are also welcome.                            
     NOTE:  Corrections may be made by the Supreme Court to the                  
full texts of the opinions after they have been released                         
electronically to the public.  The reader is therefore advised                   
to check the bound volumes of Ohio St.3d published by West                       
Publishing Company for the final versions of these opinions.                     
The advance sheets to Ohio St.3d will also contain the volume                    
and page numbers where the opinions will be found in the bound                   
volumes of the Ohio Official Reports.                                            
                                                                                 
The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Brady, Appellant.                                
[Cite as State v. Brady (1994),      Ohio St.3d     .]                           
Appellate procedure -- App.R. 26(B) -- Application for                           
     reopening appeal from judgment of conviction based on                       
     claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel --                     
     Application denied when appellant fails to show that                        
     appellate counsel was ineffective.                                          
     (No. 94-1206 -- Submitted August 17, 1994 -- Decided                        
November 9, 1994.)                                                               
     Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Summit County, No.                     
16329.                                                                           
     Appellant, Harold Brady II, alleges he was convicted of                     
one count of felonious assault and one count of burglary.  He                    
appealed, and the court of appeals affirmed the conviction by                    
judgment entry of January 12, 1994.  Appellant's motion to                       
certify the record to this court was overruled.  State v. Brady                  
(1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 1430, 631 N.E.2d 641.  He applied to the                   
court of appeals to reopen the appeal from the judgment of                       
conviction, alleging ineffective assistance of appellate                         
counsel.  In May 1994, the court of appeals denied the                           
application on the basis that appellant did not show that                        
appellate counsel was ineffective.  Appellant appeals the                        
denial to this court.                                                            
                                                                                 
     Lynn C. Slaby, Summit County Prosecuting Attorney, and                      
Philip D. Bogdanoff, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for                         
appellee.                                                                        
     Harold Brady, pro se.                                                       
                                                                                 
     Per Curiam.  The decision of the court of appeals is                        
affirmed for the reasons stated by the court of appeals.                         
                                    Judgment affirmed.                           
     Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E.                   
Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.