Title: Ong v. Gingerich

State: maryland

Issuer: Maryland Supreme Court

Document:

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND
Misc. No. 51
September Term, 2001
           LYE H. ONG
                v.
 VINCENT L. GINGERICH, SECRETARY,
 AND THE CLIENTS’ SECURITY TRUST
 FUND OF THE BAR OF MARYLAND, et al.
  
Bell, C.J.
Eldridge 
     Raker
Wilner
     Cathell
Harrell
Battaglia,
 
 JJ.
     PER CURIAM ORDER
Filed: November 7, 2002
 
LYE H. ONG
     *
In the
   
     *
Court of Appeals
v.      
     *
of Maryland
     
VINCENT L. GINGERICH, SECRETARY,   *
Misc. No. 51 
AND THE CLIENTS’ SECURITY TRUST
FUND OF THE BAR OF MARYLAND, et al.*
September Term, 2001
PER CURIAM ORDER
It appearing from the “Appeal of Administrative Decision”
filed by Lye H. Ong that the captioned case was submitted to this
Court on exceptions from a decision by the Clients’ Security Trust
Fund 
(now 
Client 
Protection 
Fund) 
in 
accordance 
with 
the 
provisions
of Maryland Rule 16-811j.2.; and Maryland Rule 16-811j.2. having
been superseded by Maryland 
Rule 
16-811i.2., 
effective 
November 6,
2002, providing for judicial review of decisions by the Client
Protection Fund pursuant to Title 7, Chapter 200 of the Maryland
Rules of Procedure, it is, therefore, this 7th day of November,
2002, 
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, on its own
motion, that this case, including all the papers filed in this
Court, be transferred to the Circuit Court for Washington County,
Maryland, for expeditious review by that Court of the Client
Protection 
Fund’s 
decision. 
 
Costs 
to 
abide 
the 
result. 
 
Mandate 
to
issue forthwith.  See Shell Oil Co. v. Supervisor, 
276 Md. 36, 343 A.2d 521 (1975); Maryland Rule 8-132.
/s/ ROBERT M. BELL            
      Chief Judge