Title: People v Panton

State: new-york

Issuer: New York Appellate Court

Document:

People v Panton

2016 NY Slip Op 05181

Decided on June 30, 2016

Court of Appeals

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on June 30, 2016

No. 118 

[*1]The People & c., Respondent,
vNadine Panton, Appellant.


Robin Nichinsky, for appellant.
David P. Stromes, for respondent.


MEMORANDUM:
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Defendant contends that police engaged in improper pre-Miranda  custodial interrogation and as a result, her post-Miranda  written and video statements should have been suppressed. Because defendant did [*2]not raise this particular ground in either her suppression motion or at the hearing, it is unpreserved for our review (see People v Gonzalez , 55 NY2d 887, 888 [1982]).
We have considered defendant's remaining contention and find it to be without merit.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia concur.
Decided June 30, 2016