Title: Capua v. Weyerhauser Company

State: hawaii

Issuer: Hawaii Supreme Court

Document:

LAW LIBRARY

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

 

00:

   

  

LANI CAPUR,
Petitioner/Claimant “Appellant

a3aws

Whiz Hd 62 AvH Bo

WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY,
Respondent /Employer-Appellee, Self-Insured

 

No. 26369

ORDER OF AMENOMENT
(CASE NO, AB 2001-23096-561 (29215704)

MAY 29, 2008

NAKAYAMA AND ACOBA, JJ.
‘The concurring opinion of Acoba, J., with whom
Nakayama, J., joined, that was attached to the majority opinion
filed on May 27, 2008, is amended as follows (deletions are
bracketed and additions are double underscored) :
Line 5 from the top of page 4: the workers’
compensation statute[s] that (are) ig applicable here.
Line 3 from the bottom of page 5: is no similar

provision in the HRS [statutes] governing PPD that
Line 3 from the bottom of the text of page 7: The
director and the LIRAB therefore (abused their
discretion) erred in
‘The Clerk of the Court is directed to incorporate the
foregoing changes in the original concurring opinion and take all
necessary steps to notify the publishing agencies of these

changes.

Nececes Creates ance

ey