Title: State ex rel. Temple v. Indus. Comm.

State: ohio

Issuer: Ohio Supreme Court

Document:

THE STATE EX REL. TEMPLE, APPELLEE, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL.; 
AT&T TECHNOLOGIES, INC., APPELLANT. 
[Cite as State ex rel. Temple v. Indus. Comm. (1998), ___ Ohio St.3d ___.] 
Workers’ compensation — Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. 
(No. 97-1252 — Submitted August 19, 1998 — Decided October 14, 1998.) 
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 96APD06-761. 
__________________ 
 
Law Offices of James R. Nein and Matthew R. Copp, for appellee Phyllis J. 
Temple. 
 
Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur and Karl J. Sutter, for appellant. 
__________________ 
 
The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion 
of the court of appeals. 
 
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur. 
 
COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent. 
__________________ 
 
LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissenting.  I would reverse the court of appeals 
and reinstate the order of the Industrial Commission. 
 
COOK, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.