Title: Interest of J.J.A.M.

State: north-dakota

Issuer: North Dakota Supreme Court

Document:

Interest of J.J.A.M.  Court Description: 88 An appeal from a juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2017 ND 88 In the Interest of J.J.A.M., a Child Gabrielle J. Goter, Assistant State's Attorney, Petitioner and Appellee v. J.J.A.M., Child, M.M., Mother; Executive Director of ND Department of Human Services, Respondents and J.W., Father, Respondent and Appellant No. 20170081 Appeal from the Juvenile Court of Morton County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Pamela Ann Nesvig, Judicial Referee. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Gabrielle J. Goter, 210 Second Avenue N.W., Mandan, N.D. 58554, for petitioner and appellee. Susan Schmidt, P.O. Box 1836, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-1836, for respondent and appellant. Interest of J.J.A.M.No. 20170081 Per Curiam. [¶1] The putative father of a three-year old child appealed from a juvenile court order terminating parental rights to the child. He argues the juvenile court erred in determining: (1) the State proved by clear and convincing evidence the child was deprived and the causes of deprivation were likely to continue and there were aggravated circumstances establishing the child was abandoned; (2) Morton County Social Services used reasonable efforts to reunite the child with him and to maintain family connections; (3) the paternity of the child was established and the child was currently adoptable; and (4) the Indian Child Welfare Act did not apply to this proceeding. [¶2] To the extent the putative father argues recent amendments to federal regulations impose new requirements on state courts to inquire and determine application of the Indian Children Welfare Act, this termination proceeding was filed in August 2016, and the amendments to the federal regulations pertaining to the Indian Child Welfare Act do not apply to termination proceedings "initiated prior to December 12, 2016." Bureau of Indian Affairs, Department of the Interior, 81 Fed. Reg. 38876 (June 14, 2016) (codified at 25 C.F.R. § 23.143). We affirm the juvenile court order under In re Adoption of C.D., 2008 ND 128, ¶ 19, 751 N.W.2d 236 and N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). [¶3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Carol Ronning Kapsner Lisa Fair McEvers Daniel J. Crothers Jerod E. Tufte