Title: State v. Schnellbach

State: north-dakota

Issuer: North Dakota Supreme Court

Document:

State v. Schnellbach  Court Description: 89 Criminal judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2017 ND 89 State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Adam Lee Schnellbach, Defendant and Appellant No. 20160342 Appeal from the District Court of Walsh County, Northeast Judicial District, the Honorable M. Richard Geiger, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Barbara L. Whelan, State's Attorney, Walsh County Courthouse, 600 Cooper Avenue, Third Floor, Grafton, N.D. 58237, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief. Stuart J. Askew, P.O. Box 386, Cavalier, N.D. 58220, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief. State v. SchnellbachNo. 20160342 Per Curiam. [¶1] Adam Schnellbach appeals a criminal judgment imposing a sentence of 60 years, to serve 22, after he entered an Alford plea for two counts of gross sexual imposition and one count of promoting sexual performance by a minor. Schnellbach argues the district court erred in its conclusions relating to the sentencing factors under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-32-04. His sentence was within the statutory guidelines, and his arguments on appeal do not show that the court relied upon an impermissible factor. State v. Gonzalez, 2011 ND 143, ¶ 11, 799 N.W.2d 402 (reviewing sentencing decision only to ensure it is within range authorized by statute and does not substantially rely on an impermissible factor). We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). [¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Jerod E. Tufte Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Carol Ronning Kapsner