Title: Young v. State

State: delaware

Issuer: Delaware Supreme Court

Document:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
ADRIANNE R. YOUNG, 
 
Defendant Below- 
Appellant, 
 
v. 
 
STATE OF DELAWARE, 
 
Plaintiff Below- 
Appellee. 
§ 
§  No. 682, 2014 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§  Court Below—Superior Court 
§  of the State of Delaware, 
§  in and for New Castle County 
§  Cr. ID 9904019648 
§ 
§ 
 
 
 
 
 
Submitted: June 24, 2015 
 
 
 
 
  Decided: August 25, 2015 
 
Before HOLLAND, VALIHURA, and VAUGHN, Justices. 
 
O R D E R 
 
 
This 25th day of August 2015, the Court has carefully considered the 
appellant’s counsel’s opening brief filed under Supreme Court Rule 26(c), 
the appellant’s points for the Court’s consideration, and the State’s response 
and motion to affirm.  We find it manifest that the judgment below should be 
affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court=s well-reasoned decision dated 
November 12, 2014. The Superior Court did not err in concluding that the 
appellant’s fourth motion for postconviction relief was untimely, repetitive, 
and previously adjudicated and that the appellant had failed to overcome 
these procedural hurdles. 
 
2 
 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the 
Superior Court is AFFIRMED. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
BY THE COURT: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Karen L. Valihura 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Justice