Title: State v. Mundy

State: ohio

Issuer: Ohio Supreme Court

Document:

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as 
State v. Mundy, Slip Opinion No. 2012-Ohio-2677.] 
 
 
 
NOTICE 
This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in 
an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports.  Readers are requested 
to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 
65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or 
other formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be 
made before the opinion is published. 
 
SLIP OPINION NO. 2012-OHIO-2677 
STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEES, v. MUNDY, APPELLANTS. 
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets,  
it may be cited as State v. Mundy, Slip Opinion No. 2012-Ohio-2677.] 
Certified conflict answered in the affirmative and court of appeals’ judgment 
reversed and cause remanded for application of State v. Harris. 
(No. 2011-0838—Submitted June 6, 2012—Decided June 19, 2012.) 
CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Summit County, No. 10CA0039-M,  
2011-Ohio-1207. 
__________________ 
{¶ 1} The certified question is answered in the affirmative.  The 
judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded for 
application of State v. Harris, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2012-Ohio-1908, ___ N.E.2d 
___. 
O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, CUPP, 
and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. 
LANZINGER, J., dissents. 
__________________ 
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 
2 
 
Dean Hollman, Medina County Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. 
Raymont Mundy, pro se. 
______________________