Title: City of Bismarck v. DeCoteau

State: north-dakota

Issuer: North Dakota Supreme Court

Document:

City of Bismarck v. DeCoteau, 544 N.W.2d 176 (N.D. 1996) [Go to Documents]Filed Jan. 3, 1996IN THE SUPREME COURTSTATE OF NORTH DAKOTA City of Bismarck, Plaintiff and Appelleev.Randy Earl DeCoteau, Defendant and Appellant Criminal No. 950157 Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Burt L. Riskedahl, Judge.AFFIRMED.Per Curiam.Paul H. Fraase, Assistant City Attorney, P.O. Box 5503, Bismarck, ND 58502-5503, for plaintiff and appellee. Submitted on briefs.William D. Schmidt, Schmitz, Moench & Schmidt, 116 N. 4th Street, Suite 200, P.O. Box 2076, Bismarck, ND 58502-2076, for defendant and appellant. Submitted on briefs. City of Bismarck v. DeCoteauCriminal No. 950157 Per Curiam. Randy Earl DeCoteau appealed from the judgment of conviction entered upon the jury verdict of guilty of driving under suspension in violation of section 12-10-06 of the Bismarck Code of Ordinances. DeCoteau argues that he did not have actual notice of the suspension orders issued to him. We affirm under N.D.R. App. P. 35.1(a)(3), (4), and (7). See N.D. Cent. Code 39-06-43; State v. Tininenko, 371 N.W.2d 762 (N.D. 1985); State v. Knittel, 308 N.W.2d 379 (N.D. 1981). Gerald W. VandeWalle, C. J.Dale V. SandstromHerbert L. MeschkeBeryl J. LevineWilliam A. Neumann