Title: State v. Ratteray

State: north-dakota

Issuer: North Dakota Supreme Court

Document:

State v. Ratteray  Court Description: Criminal judgment for gross sexual imposition and creation of sexually expressive images is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4). IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2013 ND 162 State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Christopher Ashley Ratteray, Jr., Defendant and Appellant No. 20120446 Appeal from the District Court of Barnes County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable John T. Paulson, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Lee M. Grossman, State's Attorney, 230 Fourth Street NW, Room 301, Valley City, N.D. 58072, for plaintiff and appellee. Thomas M. Jackson, 418 East Rosser Avenue, Suite 320, Bismarck, N.D. 58501, for defendant and appellant. State v. RatterayNo. 20120446 Per Curiam. [¶1] Christopher Ratteray appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of two counts of gross sexual imposition and one count of creation of sexually expressive images. Ratteray argues there is insufficient evidence to support the convictions. He also claims his sentence is excessive and was based on impermissible factors. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4). [¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Dale V. Sandstrom Daniel J. Crothers Mary Muehlen Maring Carol Ronning Kapsner