Title: R.R. v. G.H.

State: north-dakota

Issuer: North Dakota Supreme Court

Document:

R.R. v. G.H.  Filed Nov. 2, 2004 IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2004 ND 197 R.R., Plaintiff and Appellee v. G.H., as herself and Guardian of L.C.R., Defendant and Appellant No. 20040139 Appeal from the District Court of Stutsman County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Wade L. Webb, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Craig M. Richie, 203 8th St. S., P.O. Box 2172, Fargo, ND 58107-2172, for plaintiff and appellee. G.H. (on brief), pro se, defendant and appellant. R.R. v. G.H.No. 20040139 Per Curiam. [¶1] G.H. appeals from a third amended paternity judgment granting R.R. visitation with his child for a seven-day period each month and holding each parent responsible for his or her own visitation transportation costs. The district court found longer, but less frequent, periods of visitation were in the best interest of the child due to the long travel time between the parties' homes. The district court found holding each parent responsible for his or her own transportation costs was an equitable allocation of the expenses. The district court further found G.H.'s subpoena was not issued in accordance with N.D.R.Civ.P. 45, and R.R. did not have to produce the requested information or answer related questions at trial. [¶2] We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). [¶3]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Carol Ronning Kapsner Dale V. Sandstrom William A. Neumann Mary Muehlen Maring