Title: Bennett v Hucke

State: new-york

Issuer: New York Appellate Court

Document:

Bennett v Hucke

2016 NY Slip Op 05904

Decided on August 30, 2016

Court of Appeals

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on August 30, 2016

No. 190 SSM 16

[*1]Joseph Bennett, & c., Appellant, et al., Plaintiff,
vMichael Hucke, et al., Defendants, Alan Kirk, et al., Respondents.


Submitted by James Edward Gathman, Jr., for appellant.
Submitted by Timothy F. Mazzara, for respondents.


On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules (22 NYCRR 500.11), order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with costs. Plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact whether defendants-respondents Alan Kirk, et al. are subject to general contractor liability for when James Bennett was injured.
Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia concur.
Decided August 30, 2016