Title: Ucko v. Robbins

State: hawaii

Issuer: Hawaii Supreme Court

Document:

No. 26485

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

d] Si ne suoa

 

 

He

LLOYD UCKO; NANCY SCHOOCRAFT; JACK APPLEFELDi=
TERRY APPLEFELD; ELLIS CAPLAN; TINA CAPLANy/
Plaintiffs-Appellants, =

 

A. RAY ROBBINS? M. HELEN ROBBINS; JACEK ROSMARINOWSKY; ANN
ROSMARINOWSKY; ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF PU'U PO'A; BOARD
‘OF DIRECTORS OF THE ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF PU'U PO'A;

JOHN DOES 1-10; JANE DOES 1-10; DOE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF

‘DIRECTORS 1-100; DOE PU'U PO'A COMMITTEE MEMBERS 1-100; DOE
PARTNERSHIPS 1-10; DOE CORPORATIONS 1-10; and DOE ENTITIES 1-10,

Defendant s-Appellees.

APPEAL FROM THE FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT
(CIV. NO. 01-1-0142)

ORDER DENYING NOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
(By: Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, and Duffy, JJ;
with Acoba, J., Concurring Separately)

 

The motion for reconsideration filed on May 30, 2006 by
plaintiffe-appellants, Lloyd Ucko, Nancy Schoocraft, Jack
Applefeld, Terry Applefeld, £11is Caplan, and Tina Caplan,
requesting that this court review its summary disposition order,
filed on May 17, 2006, is hereby denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, June 15, 2006.

Terrance M. Revere
for plaintiffs

appellants Lloyd Ucko, Fb Beeb

Nancy Schoocraft, Jack

applefeld, Terry’ Applefeld, -
Ellis Caplan, and Tina Pees CS sale nee
Caplan, on the motion

Grnon &. Duliys She

I concur, insofar as I concurred in the result only in

the undertying case.
Ay \

qa