Title: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Au

State: hawaii

Issuer: Hawaii Supreme Court

Document:

No, 26517

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘T

 

  

 

 

 

OFFICE OF bISPLiMRE coMEEL, FeLLionen gy
vs aa
nn
PETITION TO AMEND ORDER OF SUSPENSION, | 2
8
(ove 96-242-470%, on0 97-213-H407, 98-0645)

 

Circuit Judge Crandall, in place of Acoba,
‘and Circuit Judge Wong, in place of Duffy, J., recused

upon consideration of the Respondent Ronald G.S. Aus
"Petition to Amend Order of Suspension, Filed June 7, 2005,"
which we treat as a motion made pursuant to Rule 27 of the
Hawai‘ Rules of Appellate Procedure, the Office of Disciplinary
Counsel’s response to Movant Au’s Petition to Amend Order of
Suspension, Movant Au's Reply to the Office of Disciplinary
Counsel’s response, and the record, it appears, upon careful
review of the record, that the August 25, 2006 Affidavit of Wayne
Yoshimoto does not recant the previous sworn testimony of Mr

Yoshimoto that he had a St runner’s fee agreement with Movant Au.

‘Therefore,

93s
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to #

 

motion to amend the order of suspension is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai’

 

, December 17, 200
Ronald G.S. Au, G

Charles H. Hite,

Acting Chief 0iSciplinary

Counsel, for Office of Raut Grvueeney ae

Disciplinary Counsel i $a Cran

(nding