Title: State v. Acklin

State: ohio

Issuer: Ohio Supreme Court

Document:

[Cite as State v. Acklin, 93 Ohio St.3d 213, 2001-Ohio-1329] 
1 
 
 
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. ACKLIN, APPELLANT. 
[Cite as State v. Acklin (2001), 93 Ohio St.3d 213.] 
Discretionary appeal allowed — Court of appeals’ judgment reversed and cause 
remanded for application of State v. Eppinger. 
(No. 01-910 — Submitted July 17, 2001 — Decided September 19, 2001.) 
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County, No. C-000335. 
__________________ 
 
The discretionary appeal is allowed. 
 
The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is 
remanded to the court of appeals for application of State v. Eppinger (2001), 91 
Ohio St.3d 158, 743 N.E.2d 881. 
 
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and 
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. 
__________________ 
 
Michael K. Allen, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Ronald W. 
Springman, Jr., Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. 
 
Charles H. Bartlett, Jr., for appellant. 
__________________