Title: Nasal v. Dover

State: ohio

Issuer: Ohio Supreme Court

Document:

[Cite as Nasal v. Dover, 117 Ohio St.3d 531, 2008-Ohio-1592.] 
1 
 
 
NASAL, PROS. ATTY., APPELLANT, v. DOVER, APPELLEE. 
[Cite as Nasal v. Dover, 117 Ohio St.3d 531, 2008-Ohio-1592.] 
Certified question answered and court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on the 
authority of Hyle v. Porter. 
(Nos. 2006-2220 and 2006-2311 — Submitted March 12, 2008 — Decided  
April 9, 2008.) 
APPEAL from and CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Miami County,  
No. 2006-CA-9, 169 Ohio App.3d 262, 2006-Ohio-5584. 
__________________ 
{¶ 1} The certified question is answered in the affirmative and the 
judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Hyle v. Porter, 
117 Ohio St.3d 165, 2008-Ohio-542, 882 N.E.2d 899. 
 
MOYER, 
C.J., 
and 
PFEIFER, 
LUNDBERG 
STRATTON, 
O’CONNOR, 
LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur. 
 
O’DONNELL, J., dissents. 
______________________ 
Gary A. Nasal, Miami County Prosecuting Attorney, and James R. Dicks 
Jr., Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. 
Marc Dann, Attorney General, Stephen P. Carney, Deputy Solicitor, and 
Frank M. Strigari, Assistant Attorney General, urging reversal for amicus curiae 
Attorney General of Ohio. 
______________________