Title: Masuoka v. G.W. Murphy Construction Co.

State: hawaii

Issuer: Hawaii Supreme Court

Document:

LAW LIBRARY

 

'* NOT FOR PUBLICATION ***
No. 26920

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAT'T

MICHAEL T. MASUOKA, Claimant-Appellant.

 

G.W. MURPHY CONSTRUCTION Co., Employer-Appellee

and

  

ARGONAUT INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., Insurance Carrier-Appelive

APPEAL FROM THE LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS APPEALS BOARD
(AB 2002-511 (2-94-15304))

 

(By: Moon, C.J., Levinson Neeayons" Acoba, and Duffy, JJ.)

Upon review of the second, it appears that (1) the
suprene court clerk's office informed Appellant, by letter dated
February 14, 2005, that the record on appeal cannot be filed
without payment of the filing fee pursuant to Rule 3(f) of the
Mavai't Rules of Appellate Procedure (HIAAP) or an executed motion
to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to HEAP Rule 24 and that
the matter would be called to the attention of the court for such
Action as the court deemed proper pursuant to HRAP Rule 11(a),
Including dismissal of the appeal: end (2) appellant faiied to
ay the filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma
pauperis; therefore,

IT 18 HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal 1s disaissed.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, apria 12, 2008.

FERRE nae

Pete Oo Naive ne

Boren 0 uy Br»