Title: Troy L. Blocker v. State Of Florida

State: florida

Issuer: Florida Supreme Court

Document:

Supreme Court of Florida 
 
 
____________ 
 
No. SC07-2292 
____________ 
 
TROY L. BLOCKER,  
Petitioner, 
 
vs. 
 
STATE OF FLORIDA,  
Respondent. 
 
[July 3,2008] 
 
PER CURIAM. 
We initially accepted jurisdiction to review Blocker v. State, 968 So. 2d 686 
(Fla. 2d DCA 2007), review granted, 973 So. 2d 1119 (Fla. 2007) (table), a 
decision in which the Second District Court of Appeal certified questions to be of 
great public importance.  See 968 So. 2d at 688-89, 694; art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. 
Const.  After further, full consideration, we have determined that we should 
exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction.  Accordingly, this review 
proceeding is dismissed. 
It is so ordered. 
QUINCE, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and BELL, JJ., 
concur. 
 
- 2 -
CANTERO, J., did not participate. 
 
NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED. 
 
Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal - Certified 
Great Public Importance  
 
 
Second District - Case No. 2D06-693 
 
 
(Pinellas County) 
 
Paul A. McDermott and Steven L. Brannock of Holland and Knight, LLP, Tampa, 
Florida, 
 
 
for Petitioner 
 
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, and Robert J. Krauss, 
Senior Assistant Attorney General, Patricia A. McCarthy and Ronald Napolitano, 
Assistant Attorneys General, Tampa, Florida, 
 
 
for Respondent