Title: State ex rel. Huling v. Indus. Comm.

State: ohio

Issuer: Ohio Supreme Court

Document:

[Cite as State ex rel. Huling v. Indus. Comm., 93 Ohio St.3d 252, 
2001-Ohio-1322] 
1 
 
 
THE STATE EX REL. HULING, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF 
OHIO, APPELLEE. 
[Cite as State ex rel. Huling v. Indus. Comm. (2001), 93 Ohio St.3d 252.] 
Workers’ compensation — Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. 
(No. 01-449 — Submitted July 17, 2001 — Decided September 26, 2001.) 
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 00AP-416. 
__________________ 
 
The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the 
opinion of the court of appeals. 
 
MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. 
 
DOUGLAS, RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent. 
__________________ 
 
ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J., dissenting.  I would reverse the judgment of 
the court of appeals and return the cause to the Industrial Commission for relief 
consistent with State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 
666. 
 
DOUGLAS and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting 
opinion. 
__________________ 
 
Seaman & Associates Co., L.P.A., and Angelique M. Hartzell, for 
appellant. 
 
Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Kimberly M. Connett, 
Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. 
__________________