Title: Matter of Burgos v Citywide Cent. Ins. Program

State: new-york

Issuer: New York Appellate Court

Document:

Matter of Burgos v Citywide Cent. Ins. Program

2017 NY Slip Op 08041

Decided on November 16, 2017

Court of Appeals

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on November 16, 2017

No. 142 SSM 33

[*1]Lidia Burgos, Appellant,
vCitywide Central Insurance Program et al., Respondents, Workers' Compensation Board, Respondent.


Submitted by Michael D. Uysal, for appellant.
Submitted by J. Evan Perigoe, for respondents Citywide Central Insurance Program et al.
Submitted by Laura Etlinger, for respondent Workers' Compensation Board.


On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, with costs. The Appellate Division properly concluded that substantial evidence supports the Workers' Compensation Board's determinations as to the claimant's degree of impairment and loss of wage-earning capacity (see generally Matter of Zamora v New York Neurologic Assoc., 19 NY3d 186, 192-193 [2012]). Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia, Wilson and Feinman concur.
Decided November 16, 2017