Title: Disciplinary Counsel v. Wheatley

State: ohio

Issuer: Ohio Supreme Court

Document:

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Wheatley, 111 Ohio St.3d 1202, 2006-Ohio-5085.] 
 
 
DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. WHEATLEY. 
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Wheatley,  
111 Ohio St.3d 1202, 2006-Ohio-5085.] 
(No. 2005-0349 — Submitted September 14, 2006 — Decided  
September 21, 2006.) 
ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. 
__________________ 
{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an 
application for reinstatement by respondent, Myron Daniel Wheatley, Attorney 
Registration No. 0038584, last known business address in Madison, Ohio. 
{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of December 14, 2005, 
wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a 
period of six months, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that 
order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A).  Therefore, 
{¶ 3} It is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the 
practice of law in the state of Ohio. 
{¶ 4} It is further ordered, sua sponte, by the court that if the Clients' 
Security Fund awards any amount against the respondent pursuant to Gov.Bar R. 
VIII(7)(F), the respondent shall reimburse that amount to the Clients' Security 
Fund within 90 days of the notice of such award. 
{¶ 5} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies 
of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made 
as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of 
publication. 
{¶ 6} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Wheatley, 107 Ohio 
St.3d 224, 2005-Ohio-6266, 837 N.E.2d 1188. 
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 
2 
 
MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, 
O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur. 
______________________