Title: In re Sherman (Disbarment)

State: kansas

Issuer: Kansas Supreme Court

Document:

1 
 
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS 
 
No. 14174 
 
In the Matter of MARK A. SHERMAN, 
Respondent. 
 
 
ORDER OF DISBARMENT 
 
 
 
In a letter signed July 28, 2014, addressed to the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, 
respondent Mark A. Sherman, an attorney admitted to the practice of law in the state of 
Kansas, voluntarily surrendered his license to practice law in Kansas, pursuant to 
Supreme Court Rule 217 (2013 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 396). 
 
 
At the time the respondent surrendered his license, his license to practice law was 
administratively suspended for failure to comply with the annual continuing legal 
education and attorney registration requirements. In addition, at the time the respondent 
surrendered his license, there was a panel hearing pending on a complaint in accordance 
with Supreme Court Rule 211 (2013 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 356). The complaint alleged that 
respondent violated Kansas Rules of Professional Conduct 1.1 (2013 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 
446) (competence); 1.3 (2013 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 464) (diligence); 1.4 (2013 Kan. Ct. R. 
Annot. 484) (communication); 1.16(a)(1) (2013 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 569) (declining or 
terminating representation); 3.2 (2013 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 587) (expediting litigation); 
8.1(b) (2013 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 646) (bar admission and disciplinary matters); 8.4(d) and 
(g) (2013 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 655) (misconduct); Supreme Court Rule 207(b) (2013 Kan. 
Ct. R. Annot. 336) (duties of the bar and judiciary); Supreme Court Rule 208 (2013 Kan. 
Ct. R. Annot. 349) (registration of attorneys); Supreme Court Rule 211(b) (2013 Kan. Ct. 
R. Annot. 356) (file an answer to the formal complaint); and Supreme Court Rule 218 
(2013 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 406) (notice to clients, opposing counsel, and courts following 
suspension). 
2 
 
This court, having examined the files of the office of the Disciplinary 
Administrator, finds the surrender of the respondent's license should be accepted and that 
the respondent should be disbarred. 
 
 
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Mark A. Sherman be and he is hereby disbarred 
from the practice of law in Kansas, and his license and privilege to practice law are 
hereby revoked. 
 
 
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Appellate Courts strike the name of 
Mark A. Sherman from the roll of attorneys licensed to practice law in Kansas. 
 
 
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this order shall be published in the Kansas Reports, 
that the costs herein shall be assessed to the respondent, and that the respondent forthwith 
shall comply with Supreme Court Rule 218. 
 
 
Dated this 5th day of August, 2014.