Title: State ex rel. Routt v. Indus. Comm.

State: ohio

Issuer: Ohio Supreme Court

Document:

[Cite as State ex rel. Routt v. Indus. Comm., 93 Ohio St.3d 498, 
2001-Ohio-1599] 
1 
 
 
THE STATE EX REL. ROUTT, APPELLEE, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, 
APPELLANT. 
[Cite as State ex rel. Routt v. Indus. Comm. (2001), 93 Ohio St.3d 498.] 
Workers’ compensation — Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. 
(No. 01-567 — Submitted September 18, 2001 — Decided October 31, 2001.) 
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 00AP-579. 
__________________ 
 
The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the 
opinion of the court of appeals. 
 
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and LUNDBERG 
STRATTON, JJ., concur. 
 
COOK, J., dissents. 
__________________ 
 
COOK, J., dissenting.  I respectfully dissent.  I would reverse the 
judgment of the court of appeals for the reasons stated in the opinions of the 
appellate court’s dissenting judge and the magistrate. 
__________________ 
 
Philip J. Fulton & Associates and Jonathan H. Goodman, for appellee. 
 
Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Kimberly M. Connett, 
Assistant Attorney General, for appellant. 
__________________