Title: Sun State Ford, Inc. v. Laverica Burch, Etc., Et Al.

State: florida

Issuer: Florida Supreme Court

Document:

Supreme Court of Florida 
 
 
____________ 
 
No. SC04-157 
____________ 
 
SUN STATE FORD, INC.,  
Petitioner, 
 
vs. 
 
LAVERICA BURCH, etc., et al., 
Respondents. 
 
[December 2, 2004] 
 
PER CURIAM. 
 
We initially accepted jurisdiction to review Burch v. Sun State Ford, Inc., 
864 So. 2d 466 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004), a decision which the district court of appeal 
certified to be in direct conflict with the decision of another district court pursuant 
to article V, section 3(b)(4) of the Florida Constitution.  Upon further 
consideration, we have determined that there is no actual conflict and that we 
should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction of this cause.  
Accordingly, this review proceeding is hereby dismissed. 
It is so ordered. 
PARIENTE, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and 
BELL, JJ., concur. 
 
- 2 - 
 
NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED. 
 
 
Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal - Certified 
Direct Conflict 
 
 
Fifth District - Case No. 5D02-2807 
 
 
(Orange County) 
 
Marissa I. Delinks of Hinshaw & Culbertson, LLP, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, and 
Joshua G. Vincent of Hinshaw and Culbertson, LLP, Chicago, Illinois, 
 
 
for Petitioner 
 
Daryl D. Parks of Parks and Crump, LLC, Tallahassee, Florida, on behalf of 
Laverica Burch, Ny’ Jae Aaliyah Miles, Regina Pace, Akeiad D. Miles and Aaryon 
Miles; and Warren B. Kwavnick of Cooney, Mattson, Lance, Blackburn, Richards 
and O’Conner, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, Florida, on behalf of Willie Gene Beauford, 
Jr., 
 
 
for Respondent