Title: People v George

State: new-york

Issuer: New York Appellate Court

Document:

People v George


2008 NY Slip Op 09251 [11 NY3d 848]


November 25, 2008


Court of Appeals


Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.


As corrected through Wednesday, February 4, 2009



[*1]
The People of the State of New York, Appellant-Respondent,vRaymond C. George, Respondent-Appellant.Argued October 21, 2008; decided November 25, 2008



People v George, 43 AD3d 560, affirmed.



APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL


McNamee, Lochner, Titus & Williams, P.C., Albany (David J. Wukitsch of counsel), for respondent-appellant.
James Sacket, District Attorney, Schoharie, for appellant-respondent.

{**11 NY3d at 849} OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Contrary to the People's contention, defendant properly preserved for our review his challenge to the legal sufficiency of his depraved indifference murder conviction (see People v Hawkins, 11 NY3d 484 [2008] [decided today]).
[*2] The Appellate Division properly evaluated defendant's sufficiency challenge in light of our current decisional law on depraved indifference murder (see People v Jean-Baptiste, 11{**11 NY3d at 850} NY3d 539 [2008] [decided herewith]). We agree with the Appellate Division that the evidence was insufficient to establish that defendant acted with depraved indifference to human life, but was legally sufficient to convict him of the lesser included offense of manslaughter in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.15 [1]).
Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.