Title: State v. Bruederle

State: north-dakota

Issuer: North Dakota Supreme Court

Document:

State v. Bruederle  Court Description: District court orders and amended judgments revoking probation are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (4), and (7). IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2012 ND 26 State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. William Cody Bruederle, Jr., Defendant and Appellant Nos. 20110179 - 20110180 Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable David E. Reich, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Jacob Tyler Rodenbiker, Assistant State's Attorney, 514 East Thayer Avenue, Bismarck, N.D. 58501, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief. Kent M. Morrow, P.O. Box 2155, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-2155, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief. State v. BruederleNos. 20110179 - 20110180 Per Curiam. [¶1] William Cody Bruederle, Jr., appeals from the district court's orders and amended criminal judgments revoking his probation. On appeal, Bruederle argues the court erred in revoking his probation based on an allegation that he committed a new offense because he had not been convicted of committing a new offense. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (4), and (7). See State v. Wetzel, 2011 ND 218, 806 N.W.2d 193 (a criminal conviction is not required to revoke probation based on an allegation that the probationer committed a new offense). [¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Carol Ronning Kapsner Mary Muehlen Maring Dale V. Sandstrom Daniel J. Crothers