Title: Daigle v. State

State: hawaii

Issuer: Hawaii Supreme Court

Document:

UW LBs

No. 26754
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'T

THOMAS R. DAIGLE, Petitioner-Appellent,
STATE OF HAWAT'I, Respondent-Appellee. ||
ne

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS) =
(S.P.P. NO, 04-1-0008 (CR. NO. 50114)) >

 

aad

  

ORDER
(py: Nakayama, J.)

upon consideration of Petitioner-Appellant’s ex-parte
motion to extend time to file certiorari in the supreme court,
the record herein and it appearing that HRS § 602-59(c) does not
allow for extensions of time to file a writ of certiorari,

I? 1S HEREBY ORDERED the motion is denied. However,
HRS § 602-59(c) and Hawai" Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule
40.1 allow Appellant thirty days from the filing of the
Intermediate Court of Appeals’ (ICA) Summary Disposition Order to
seek review of the ICA‘s decision by this court. The Summary
Disposition Order was filed on July 21, 2005 and Appellant ha:
until August 20, 2005 to file an application for writ of
certiorari, However, pursuant to Hawai'i Rules of Appellate
Procedure Rule 26, if the last day of the period is a Saturday,
sunday or legal holiday, then the deadline extends until the end
of the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday.
‘Therefore, the application for writ of certiorari must be filed
in the Supreme Court Clerk’s Office by the close of business on
August 22, 2005.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, August 16, 2008.

Sen OS reer Gre

Associate Justice

iT
SEAL °

      
 

Thongs R- Daigle,
fitionér-appellant, pro se
Bathe motion® »