Title: In the Matter of Kenneth L. Mitchum

State: south-carolina

Issuer: South Carolina Supreme Court

Document:

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court In the Matter of Kenneth L. Mitchum, Respondent. Opinion No. 26514 Submitted June 3, 2008 – Filed June 30, 2008 DEFINITE SUSPENSION Lesley M. Coggiola, Disciplinary Counsel, and Ericka M. Williams, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, both of Columbia; for Office of Disciplinary Counsel Kenneth L. Mitchum, of Georgetown, pro se. PER CURIAM: In this attorney disciplinary matter, respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel have entered into an Agreement for Discipline by Consent (Agreement) pursuant to Rule 21, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. In the Agreement, respondent admits misconduct and consents to the imposition of a public reprimand or a definite suspension not to exceed two years pursuant to Rule 7(b), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. We accept the agreement and suspend respondent from the practice of law in this state for nine months. The facts, as set forth in the Agreement, are as follows. FACTS Respondent admits the following with regard to his representation of a client: Respondent failed to keep the client reasonably informed of the status of her cases and failed to promptly comply with the client’s reasonable requests for information. Law Respondent admits that by his conduct he has violated the following provisions of the Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 407, SCACR: Rule 1.1 (a lawyer shall provide competent representation, including the legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness and preparation reasonably necessary for the representation, to a client); Rule 1.2 (a lawyer shall abide by a client’s decisions concerning the objectives of representation and consult with the client as to the means by which they are to be pursued); Rule 1.3 (a lawyer shall act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client); Rule 1.4 (a lawyer shall consult with a client about the client’s case, keep the client reasonably informed about the case and promptly respond to reasonable requests for information); Rule 1.8(e)(a lawyer shall not provide financial assistance to a client in connection with pending or contemplated litigation, except that a lawyer may advance court costs and expenses of litigation, the repayment of which may be contingent on the outcome of the matter and a lawyer representing an indigent client may pay court costs and expenses of litigation on behalf of the client); and Rule 8.4(a) (it is professional misconduct for a lawyer to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct). Respondent also admits that he has violated Rule 7(a)(1) of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement, Rule 413, SCACR, by violating the Rules of Professional Conduct. Conclusion We find a nine month suspension is the appropriate sanction for respondent’s misconduct. Accordingly, we accept the Agreement for Discipline by Consent and suspend respondent from the practice of law for nine months. Within fifteen days of the date of this opinion, respondent shall file an affidavit with the Clerk of Court showing that he has complied with Rule 30, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. DEFINITE SUSPENSION. TOAL, C.J., MOORE, WALLER, PLEICONES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.