Title: State v. Larabee

State: ohio

Issuer: Ohio Supreme Court

Document:

OPINIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO                               
     The full texts of the opinions of the Supreme Court of                      
Ohio are being transmitted electronically beginning May 27,                      
1992, pursuant to a pilot project implemented by Chief Justice                   
Thomas J. Moyer.                                                                 
     Please call any errors to the attention of the Reporter's                   
Office of the Supreme Court of Ohio.  Attention:  Walter S.                      
Kobalka, Reporter, or Deborah J. Barrett, Administrative                         
Assistant.  Tel.:  (614) 466-4961; in Ohio 1-800-826-9010.                       
Your comments on this pilot project are also welcome.                            
     NOTE:  Corrections may be made by the Supreme Court to the                  
full texts of the opinions after they have been released                         
electronically to the public.  The reader is therefore advised                   
to check the bound volumes of Ohio St.3d published by West                       
Publishing Company for the final versions of these opinions.                     
The advance sheets to Ohio St.3d will also contain the volume                    
and page numbers where the opinions will be found in the bound                   
volumes of the Ohio Official Reports.                                            
                                                                                 
The State of Ohio, Appellant, v. Larabee, Appellee.                              
[Cite as State v. Larabee (1995),     Ohio St.3d    .]                           
Evidence -- R.C. 2933.52(A) prohibition of purposeful                            
interception of wire or oral communications through use of an                    
interception device applicable to cordless telephone                             
communications.                                                                  
     (No. 94-2556 -- Submitted March 7, 1995 -- Decided April                    
19, 1995.)                                                                       
     Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Fairfield County, No.                  
8-CA-92.                                                                         
                                                                                 
     Richard L. Ross, Special Prosecuting Attorney, for                          
appellant.                                                                       
     Harry R. Reinhart; Lantz, Lantz & Lipp Co., L.P.A. and                      
Charles J. Lantz, for appellee.                                                  
                                                                                 
     The discretionary appeal is allowed.  The judgment of the                   
court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v.                        
Bidinost (1994), 71 Ohio St.3d 449, 644 N.E.2d 318.                              
     Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney,                        
Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.