Title: Lorenzetti v. Hodges, et al.

State: delaware

Issuer: Delaware Supreme Court

Document:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
LOREN LORENZETTI,  
 
Plaintiff Below- 
Appellant, 
 
v. 
 
DOROTHEA HODGES, TAMARA 
HODGES, ZACK HODGES and 
MICHAEL BAGLEY, 
 
           Defendants Below- 
Appellees. 
§ 
§  No. 530, 2013 
§ 
§ 
§  Court Below-Court of Chancery 
§  of the State of Delaware 
§  C.A. No. 7385 
§   
§ 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§ 
 
                                         Submitted: October 18, 2013 
 
 
 
 
   Decided: October 28, 2013 
 
 
 
 
 
 
O R D E R  
 
 
This 28th day of October 2013, it appears to the Court that, on 
October 3, 2013, the Clerk issued a notice to show cause why this appeal 
should not be dismissed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b) for the 
appellant’s failure to comply with Rule 42 when taking an appeal from an 
apparent interlocutory order.  The appellant has failed to respond to the 
notice to show cause within the required ten-day period.  Therefore, 
dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed. 
 
 
 
2
 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme Court 
Rule 29(b), that this appeal is DISMISSED. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
BY THE COURT: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Randy J. Holland 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Justice