Title: Curley, T., Aplt. v. Wetzel, J., et al (per curiam order)

State: pennsylvania

Issuer: Pennsylvania Supreme Court

Document:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT TODD CURLEY, Appellant v. JOHN E. WETZEL (SECRETARY OF CORRECTIONS), JOHN KERESTES (SCI MAHANOY SUPERINTENDENT), JOSEPH NEVIS (PA. D.O.C. INMATE ACCOUNTS), EDWARD SANDERCOCK (WAYNE COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS), Appellees : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : No. 31 MAP 2012 Appeal from the Order of the Commonwealth Court dated March 14, 2012 at 871 M.D. 2010 ORDER PER CURIAM DECIDED: December 17, 2013 AND NOW, this 17th day of December, 2013, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is AFFIRMED. By this Order, this Court does not embrace the Commonwealth Court’s view that this action sounds in mandamus or that a six-month statute of limitations applies to actions in mandamus in this context. Mr. Chief Justice Castille files a Concurring Statement in which Mr. Justice Eakin joins.