Title: Fatir v. State

State: delaware

Issuer: Delaware Supreme Court

Document:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
AMIR FATIR, 
 
Defendant Below- 
Appellant, 
 
v. 
 
STATE OF DELAWARE, 
 
Plaintiff Below- 
Appellee. 
§ 
§  No. 250, 2013 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§  Court Below—Superior Court 
§  of the State of Delaware, 
§  in and for New Castle County 
§  Cr. ID 75060892DI 
§ 
§ 
 
 
 
 
 
Submitted: October 25, 2013 
 
 
 
 
  Decided: November 20, 2013 
 
Before HOLLAND, BERGER and RIDGELY, Justices 
 
O R D E R 
 
 
This 20th day of November 2013, after careful consideration of the 
parties’ briefs and the record on appeal, we find it manifest that the 
judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court’s 
decision, dated April 25, 2013, adopting the Commissioner’s report and 
recommendation. The Superior Court did not err in concluding that 
appellant’s sixth motion for postconviction relief was procedurally barred 
and that appellant had failed to overcome the procedural hurdles.  Moreover, 
we find no abuse of discretion in the Superior Court’s denial of appellant’s 
motion for a copy of his trial transcripts at State expense. 
 
2
 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the 
Superior Court is AFFIRMED. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
BY THE COURT: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Randy J. Holland 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Justice