Title: Bailey v. Walker

State: delaware

Issuer: Delaware Supreme Court

Document:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
WAYNE BAILEY, JR.,1  
 
Respondent Below- 
Appellant, 
 
v. 
 
KIM WALKER,  
 
          Petitioner Below- 
Appellee. 
§ 
§  No. 288, 2011 
§ 
§ 
§  Court Below─Family Court 
§  of the State of Delaware 
§  in and for Sussex County 
§  File No. CS04-02974 
§  Petition No. 10-40214 
§ 
§ 
 
Submitted: July 24, 2011 
Decided: August 2, 2011 
 
 
 
 
 
 
O R D E R  
 
 
This 2nd day of August 2011, it appears to the Court that, on July 7, 2011, the Clerk 
issued a notice to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed pursuant to Supreme 
Court Rule 29(b) for the appellant’s failure to diligently prosecute the appeal by not paying the 
Supreme Court filing fee.  The appellant has failed to respond to the notice to show cause within 
the required 10-day period.  Therefore, dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed. 
 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b), that this 
appeal is DISMISSED. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
BY THE COURT: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Henry duPont Ridgely 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Justice  
 
                                                 
1 By Order dated June 13, 2011, the Court sua sponte assigned pseudonyms to the parties.  Del. 
Supr. Ct. R. 7(d).