Title: Frontier One, LCC v. McKenna

State: hawaii

Issuer: Hawaii Supreme Court

Document:

LAWLIBRARY

No, 28603

 

IN THE SUPREME COURD OF ‘THE STATE OF HAWAT!
FRONTIER ONE, LCC, a Hawaii Limited Labiiry:|®

 

oat

 

THE HONORABLE SABRINA S. MCKENNA, JUDGE OF THE FIRST
CIRCUIT COURT, STATE OF HAWAI'I; VESTIN MORTGAGE, INC.
VESTIN REALTY MORTGAGE I, INC.; VESTIN REALTY
MORTGAGE 12, INC.; OWENS MORTGAGE INVESTMENT FUND:
BRIDGE CAPITAL, INC.; SUNSET FINANCIAL RESOURCES, INC.;
STATE OF HAWAI'I, Respondents.

 

 

 

 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
(CIV. NO, 04-1-2126)

(By: Moon, C.J., Levinson,

 

lakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, JJ.)

upon consideration of the petition for a writ of
mandamus filed by petitioner Frontier One, LUC and the papers in
support, it appears that the agreenent resolving the foreclosure
eale implements the October 31, 2006 order modifying the May 13,
2005 foreclosure decree. The provisions of the resolution

aor

 

ment are reviewable on app

 

1 of @ judgment entered on an
order confirming the foreclosure sale, the judgment may be stayed
pending appeal, and petitioner has an adequate remedy by way of

appeal. See HRS § 667-51(a) (2) (Supp. 2006); HRAP 8. ‘Therefore,
pers

  

joner is not entitled to mandamus relief. See Kema vs
Gaddis, 91 Hawai'i 200, 204, 962 P.24 334, 338 (2999) (A writ of
mandamus is an extraordinary renedy that will not issue unless
the petitioner denonstrates a clear and indisputable right to
relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the

alleged wrong or obtain the requested action. Such writs are not
intended to supersede the legal discretionary authority of the

lower courts, nor are they intended to serve

 

legal remedies in

 

lieu of normal appellate procedures.). Accordingly,
I? IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of
mandamus is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, July 5, 2007.

Sli ian
Rua bree gare

e
Yorn, Lelgs