Title: Home Indem. Company v. Hoechst-Celanese Corporation

State: north-carolina

Issuer: North Carolina Supreme Court

Document:

396 S.E.2d 611 (1990)
327 N.C. 428
The HOME INDEMNITY COMPANY, The Home Insurance Company and City Insurance Company
v.
HOECHST-CELANESE CORPORATION, Ace Insurance Company, Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, Aiu Insurance Company, et al.
No. 380P90.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
August 29, 1990.
Parker, Poe, Adams & Bernstein, Charlotte, for Hoechst-Celanese Corp.
Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, Charlotte, for several appellants.
Bell, Davis & Pitt, Winston-Salem, and Rivkin, Radler, Bayh, Hart & Kremer, Uniondale, N.Y., for Commercial Union Ins. Co.
Sheft and Sheft, New York City, and Petree, Stockton & Robinson, Charlotte, for several defendants.
Underwood, Kinsey & Warren, Charlotte, for Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.
Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Several Appellants in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Defendant (Hoechst-Celanese); and upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Several Appellants pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is
*612 "Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th day of August 1990."
The Petition for Discretionary Review is:
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendants (AIU Group) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: