Title: Disciplinary Counsel v. Dzienny

State: ohio

Issuer: Ohio Supreme Court

Document:

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Dzienny, 98 Ohio St.3d 1214, 2003-Ohio-1914.] 
 
 
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. DZIENNY. 
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Dzienny, 98 Ohio St.3d 1214, 2003-Ohio-1914.] 
(No. 2002-0294 — Submitted March 14, 2003 — Decided March 17, 2003.) 
ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. 
__________________ 
{¶1} 
This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an 
application for reinstatement by respondent, Michael Dzienny, a.k.a. Michael Andrew 
Dzienny, Attorney Registration No. 0037618, last known business address in Toledo, 
Ohio. 
{¶2} 
The court coming now to consider its order of July 31, 2002, wherein the 
court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of 18 
months with one year suspended on condition, finds that respondent has substantially 
complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A).  Therefore,  
{¶3} 
IT IS ORDERED by this court that Michael Dzienny, a.k.a. Michael 
Andrew Dzienny, be and hereby is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. 
{¶4} 
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified 
copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as 
provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication. 
{¶5} 
For earlier cases, see Toledo Bar Assn. v. Dzienny, 96 Ohio St.3d 144, 
2002-Ohio-3611, 772 N.E.2d 627, and Toledo Bar Assn. v. Dzienny (1995), 72 Ohio 
St.3d 173, 648 N.E.2d 499. 
 
MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK, LUNDBERG STRATTON 
and O’CONNOR, JJ., concur. 
__________________