Title: Jodka v. Cleveland

State: ohio

Issuer: Ohio Supreme Court

Document:

[Cite as Jodka v. Cleveland, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2015-Ohio-861.] 
 
 
 
 
JODKA, APPELLANT, v. THE CITY OF CLEVELAND ET AL., APPELLEES. 
[Cite as Jodka v. Cleveland, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2015-Ohio-861.] 
Certification of conflict dismissed as improvidently certified. 
(No. 2014-0480—Submitted July 9, 2014—Decided March 12, 2015.) 
CERTIFIED BY the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 99951, 2014-Ohio-
208. 
____________________ 
{¶ 1} The certification of conflict is dismissed, sua sponte, as having 
been improvidently certified. 
O’CONNOR, C.J., and LANZINGER, KENNEDY, and FRENCH, JJ., concur. 
PFEIFER and O’NEILL, JJ., dissent. 
O’DONNELL, J., not participating. 
________________________ 
 
Mayle, Ray & Mayle, L.L.C., Andrew R. Mayle, Jeremiah S. Ray, and 
Ronald J. Mayle; and Murray & Murray, Co., L.P.A., and John T. Murray, for 
appellant. 
 
Barbara Langhenry, Director of Law, and Gary Singletary, Assistant 
Director of Law, for appellee city of Cleveland. 
 
Baker & Hostetler, L.L.P., Gregory V. Mersol, and Chris Bator, for 
appellees Affiliated Computer Services, Inc., Boulder Acquisition Corp., and 
Xerox Corp. 
________________________