Title: Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Garfield

State: ohio

Issuer: Ohio Supreme Court

Document:

[Cite as Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Garfield, 112 Ohio St.3d 1216, 2007-Ohio-803.] 
1 
 
 
CUYAHOGA COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. GARFIELD. 
[Cite as Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Garfield,  
112 Ohio St.3d 1216, 2007-Ohio-803.] 
(No. 2005-2333 — Submitted February 13, 2007 — Decided February 20, 2007.) 
ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. 
__________________ 
{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an 
application for reinstatement by respondent, Robert Earl Garfield, Attorney 
Registration No. 0001873, last known business address in Pepper Pike, Ohio. 
{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of May 3, 2006, 
wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a 
period of eighteen months with a starting date of March 28, 2005, finds that 
respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of 
Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A).  Therefore, 
{¶ 3} It is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the 
practice of law in the state of Ohio. 
{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the Clerk of this court issue certified 
copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be 
made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the 
costs of publication. 
{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Garfield, 109 
Ohio St.3d 103, 2006-Ohio-1935, 846 N.E.2d 45. 
 
MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL, 
LANZINGER and CUPP, JJ., concur. 
______________________