Title: Ohio Consumers' Counsel v. Pub. Util. Comm.

State: ohio

Issuer: Ohio Supreme Court

Document:

[Cite as Ohio Consumers' Counsel v. Pub. Util. Comm., 109 Ohio St.3d 511, 2006-Ohio-3054.] 
 
 
OHIO CONSUMERS’ COUNSEL, APPELLANT, v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 
OF OHIO, APPELLEE. 
[Cite as Ohio Consumers’ Counsel v. Pub. Util. Comm., 
109 Ohio St.3d 511, 2006-Ohio-3054.] 
Public utilities — Electric company — Competitive electric service — Rate-
stabilization plan — Decision of the Public Utilities Commission vacated 
on the authority of Ohio Consumers’ Counsel v. Pub. Util. Comm. 
(No. 2005-0767 — Submitted May 24, 2006 — Decided July 5, 2006.) 
APPEAL from the Public Utilities Commission, 
No. 04-169-EL-UNC. 
__________________ 
{¶1} 
Based on the second proposition of law in appellant’s brief and our 
decision in Ohio Consumers’ Counsel v. Pub. Util. Comm., 109 Ohio St.3d 328, 
2006-Ohio-2110, 847 N.E.2d 1184, the decision of the Public Utilities 
Commission is vacated, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings not 
inconsistent with that decision.  This order does not preclude appellant from 
raising its first, third, fourth, and fifth propositions of law in a future appeal from 
the Public Utilities Commission. 
 
MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, 
O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur. 
__________________ 
 
Janine L. Migden-Ostrander, Ohio Consumers’ Counsel, and Kimberly W. 
Bojko and Jeffrey L. Small, Assistant Consumers’ Counsel, for appellant. 
 
Jim Petro, Attorney General, Duane W. Luckey, Senior Deputy Attorney 
General, and William L. Wright and Steven T. Nourse, Assistant Attorneys 
General, for appellee. 
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 
2 
 
Porter Wright Morris & Arthur, L.L.P., and Daniel R. Conway; Marvin I. 
Resnick, Kevin F. Duffy, and Sandra K. Williams, for intervening appellees 
Columbus Southern Power Company and Ohio Power Company. 
______________________