Title: Thomas v. Dremmel

State: wyoming

Issuer: Wyoming Supreme Court

Document:

Thomas v. Dremmel1994 WY 13868 P.2d 263Case Number: 93-92Decided: 02/04/1994Supreme Court of Wyoming

 

F.L. 
THOMAS; Celeste Mori; Alvin Rangitsch; Clyde Huntsman; and Vicki 
Kulinsky,

 Appellants 
(Plaintiffs),

v.

Ronald 
DREMMEL,

 Appellee (Defendant).

 

Appeal 
from the District Court, Lincoln County, John D. Troughton, 
J.

Tracy 
J. Copenhaver and R. Scott Kath of Copenhaver, Kath & Kitchen, Powell, 
for appellants.

Ronald 
Dremmel, pro se.

Before 
MACY, C.J., and THOMAS, CARDINE, GOLDEN and TAYLOR, JJ.

TAYLOR, 
Justice.

[¶1]      In this appeal, 
we review a judgment of the district court which found that Ronald Dremmel could 
remain in his job as an employee of Lincoln County School District No. 1 and, at 
the same time, sit as an elected member of the Board of Trustees of that school 
district.

[¶2]      We 
reverse.

[¶3]      Appellants, 
electors in the school district, furnish this summary of the issues on 
appeal:

1. 
The lower court erred in ruling that the appellee was eligible to hold the 
office of trustee for Lincoln County School District No. 1 when the appellee's 
position as a full-time employee for Lincoln County School District No. 1 was, 
and is, incompatible and inconsistent with appellee's also serving as a trustee 
of the same school district.

2. 
The lower court erred in not granting the declaratory judgment relief sought by 
appellants wherein appellants requested that the court declare that the 
positions of an employee for a school district and a member of the board of 
trustees for the same school district are incompatible and inconsistent such 
that said employee is not qualified, while an employee, to hold the position of 
trustee for that same school district.

[¶4]      Ronald Dremmel 
(Dremmel) generally contends the district court was correct in its determination 
that his job as a maintenance man for the school district and his office as a 
member of the Board of Trustees for that school district do not present a 
conflict of interest and he may hold both positions at the same 
time.

[¶5]      During the 
general election in 1992, Dremmel was elected as a member of the Board of 
Trustees for Lincoln County School District No. 1. The results of the election 
were certified by the canvassing board on November 6, 1992, and Dremmel's term 
of office began on December 1, 1992. Appellants, electors in the affected school 
district, brought this action seeking a declaration that Dremmel could not be an 
employee of the school district and, at the same time, be a member of the Board 
of Trustees of the school district because that violated the common law rule 
governing incompatibility of offices. The district court denied relief, finding 
that the voters in the school district were aware that Dremmel was an employee 
of the school district when they elected him and because conflict of interest 
mechanisms provided relief from the incompatibility issue.

[¶6]      We clearly 
decided the question at issue here in Haskins v. State ex rel. Harrington, 516 P.2d 1171 (Wyo. 1973). The reasoning employed in that decision is equally 
applicable to this matter, i.e., "it is inimical to the public interest for one 
in public employment to be both the employer and the employee or the supervisor 
and the supervised." Id. at 1178. Our decision in Haskins, and our ruling today 
to hold to that course, is strongly supported by several other jurisdictions, 
including many that relied, at least in part, upon our holding in Haskins. 
Acevedo v. City of North Pole, 672 P.2d 130, 134 (Alaska 1983); Montrose County 
School Dist. Re-1J v. Lambert, 826 P.2d 349, 352 (Colo. 1992); Rogers v. Village 
of Tinley Park, 116 Ill. App.3d 437, 72 Ill.Dec. 1, 451 N.E.2d 1324, 1330 
(1983); Tarpo v. Bowman Public School Dist. No. 1, 232 N.W.2d 67, 71 (N.D. 
1975); Cranston Teachers Alliance Local No. 1704 AFT v. Miele, 495 A.2d 233, 237 
(R.I. 1985); Ortadovec v. City of Green Bay, 118 Wis.2d 393, 347 N.W.2d 614, 616 
(1984). Dremmel failed to provide persuasive reasoning for departing from the 
rule stated in Haskins.

[¶7]      Dremmel's wife 
was also employed by the school district as a teacher and a claim was made that 
her employment also served to disqualify Dremmel from holding office as a member 
of the Board of Trustees. This question was addressed in Coyne v. State ex rel. 
Thomas, 595 P.2d 970 (Wyo. 1979). However, since we now hold that Dremmel's 
employment with the school district disqualifies him from serving as a member of 
the board of trustees, it is unnecessary for us to further consider the question 
here.

[¶8]      In their reply 
brief, appellants contend we should disregard Dremmel's argument because of 
Dremmel's failure to conform to the Wyoming Rules of Appellate Procedure. For 
obvious reasons, we decline to address this issue.

[¶9]      We are, thus, 
compelled to reverse the decision of the district court and remand with 
directions that a judgment be entered declaring that the office held by Dremmel 
as a member of the Board of Trustees for the Lincoln County School District No. 
1 be vacated.1

Footnote

1 In Haskins, we held that circumstances such as those extant here 
(assertion of right to hold both employment and office) require that the 
position as a member of the board of trustees be vacated. Haskins, 516 P.2d  at 
1180. Some jurisdictions would afford a choice to Dremmel, i.e., he must resign 
one or the other. See Tarpo, 232 N.W.2d  at 71 and Ortadovec, 347 N.W.2d  at 616. 
However, since no such relief was sought by Dremmel in the event this court 
chose to reverse, we will apply Haskins as it stands.