Title: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Rodrigues

State: hawaii

Issuer: Hawaii Supreme Court

Document:

wo. 10688

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'T

 

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner,

2 3S woe

RODRIGUES, Respondent

ROBERT S.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
4-826, 05-175-8327, 05-177-8329}-

 

148 hy

 

(onc 08

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR EXTENSION
OF EFFECTIVE DATE OF ORDER OF DISBARMENT
(By: Levinson, J., for the court")
Upon consideration of the Respondent Robert 5.

Rodrigues’ “Motion For Extension of Effective Date of Order of
Disbarment,” which we treat as 2 motion for reconsideration made
pursuant to Rule 40 of the Hawai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure

and the record,

(HRAP)
IT 1S HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to HRAP 40(e), the

motion for reconsideration is denied as an unauthorized second

motion for reconsideration.

DATED: Honolulu, September 22, 2008.

STEVEN H. LEVINSOR® great
Associate Justicel SE!

Hawai'i,

  

   

Robert $. Rodrigues,
respondent pro se,
‘on the motion

Acoba, and Duffy,

 

+ Considered by: Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayan

Js.