Title: The Florida Bar v. Turner

State: florida

Issuer: Florida Supreme Court

Document:

344 So. 2d 1280 (1977)
THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,
v.
William Huger TURNER, III, Respondent.
No. 50708.

Supreme Court of Florida.
April 7, 1977.
*1281 Melvin C. Alldredge, Bar Counsel, Miami, and John A. Weiss, Asst. Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, for The Florida Bar, complainant.
William Huger Turner, III, in pro. per.
PER CURIAM.
This disciplinary proceeding by The Florida Bar against William Huger Turner, III, a member of The Florida Bar, is presently before us on complaint of The Florida Bar and Report of Referee. Pursuant to Rule 11.06(9)(b) of the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar, the referee's report and record were duly filed with this court. No petition for review pursuant to Rule 11.09(1), Integration Rule, has been filed.
Having considered the pleadings and evidence, the referee found as follows:
The referee recommends that respondent be found guilty of violation of Rule 11.02(3)(a) and (b) of the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar and DR 1-102(A)(4) of the Code of Professional Responsibility and recommends that respondent receive a public reprimand.
Having carefully reviewed the record, we approve the findings and recommendations of the referee.
Accordingly, respondent, William Huger Turner, III, is hereby publicly reprimanded, and the publication of this order and judgment shall constitute a public reprimand.
Execution is hereby directed to issue against respondent for costs in the amount of $338.50.
It is so ordered.
OVERTON, C.J., and ADKINS, BOYD, ENGLAND and KARL, JJ., concur.