Title: Primestone Investment Partners L. P. v. Vornado PS, LLC and Vornado Realty, L.P., et al.

State: delaware

Issuer: Delaware Supreme Court

Document:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
PRIMESTONE  INVESTMENT
§
PARTNERS L.P., a Delaware
§
No. 30, 2003
limited partnership,
§
§
Defendant/Counter-
§
Claimant Below,
§
Appellant,
§
§
v.
§
Court Below: Court of 
§
Chancery of the State of
§
Delaware in and for
VORNADO PS, L.L.C., a Delaware
 
§
New Castle County
limited partnership,
§
C.A. No. 19264
§
Plaintiff/Counterclaim
§
Defendant Below,
§
Appellee,
§
§
and
§
§
VORNADO REALTY, L.P., a Delaware
§
limited partnership, and VORNADO
§
REALTY TRUST, a New York
§
corporation,
§
§
Third Party Counter-
§
claim Defendants 
§
Below, Appellees.
§
Submitted: April 15, 2003
Decided: April 16, 2003
Before VEASEY, Chief Justice, BERGER and STEELE, Justices.
2
O R D E R
This 16th day of April, 2003, having considered this matter after oral
argument and on the briefs of the parties, the Court concludes that the same should
be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned by the Court of Chancery
in its order dated December 19, 2002.  With respect to appellant’s claim under
Court of Chancery Rule 56(f), although the trial court did not expressly address
the request for additional discovery, we find no abuse of discretion in denying the
request since the court had already allowed appellant additional discovery, and the
witnesses appellant sought to depose were known to appellant long before it filed
its second Rule 56(f) affidavit.
          NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment of the
Court of Chancery be and the same hereby is
     AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Carolyn Berger
Justice