Title: State ex rel. Maynard v. Invensys Application Controls

State: ohio

Issuer: Ohio Supreme Court

Document:

[Cite as State ex rel. Maynard v. Invensys Application Controls, 105 Ohio St.3d 176, 2005-
Ohio-1147.] 
1 
 
 
THE STATE EX REL. MAYNARD, APPELLANT, v. INVENSYS APPLICATION 
CONTROLS ET AL., APPELLEES. 
[Cite as State ex rel. Maynard v. Invensys Application Controls,  
105 Ohio St.3d 176, 2005-Ohio-1147.] 
Workers' compensation — Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. 
(No. 2004-0924 — Submitted February 15, 2005 — Decided March 30, 2005.) 
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, 
 No. 03AP-371, 2004-Ohio-2638. 
__________________ 
{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with 
the opinion of the court of appeals. 
 
MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, 
O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur. 
__________________ 
 
Michael J. Muldoon, for appellant. 
 
Roetzel & Andress, L.P.A., Charles D. Smith, and Eric S. Bravo, for 
appellee Invensys Application Controls. 
 
Jim Petro, Attorney General, and Paul H. Tonks, Assistant Attorney 
General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio. 
_____________________