Title: Barnhard v. Phillips

State: hawaii

Issuer: Hawaii Supreme Court

Document:

no. 28088

DANE JAY BARNHARD, Petitioner

‘THOMAS PHILLIPS, MAUI COUNTY - CHIEF OF POLICE, Respondent

 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
ORDER
(By: Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, JJ.)
upon consideration of the petition for a writ of

mandamus filed by petitioner Dane Barnhard and the papers in
support, it appears that petitioner’s claim of violations of
Hawas's Revised Statutes § 291C-112 and Maui County Code
§ 13.04.160 ie not supported by any evidence and the claim is not
clear and certain, Therefore, petitioner has failed to
demonstrate a clear and indisputable right to relief and is not
entitied to a writ of mandamus, See In Re Disciplinary Bd, of
Hawaii Supreme Court, 91 Hawai'i 363, 984 P.2d 688
(1999) (Mandamus relief is available to compel an official to
perform a duty allegedly owed to an individual only if the
Andividval’s claim is clear and certain, the official's duty is
ministerial and so plainly prescribed as to be free from doubt,

and no other remedy is available.). Therefore,

aang
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of
mandanus is denied
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, August 3, 2006.

Dane Jay Barnhard,
petitioner, pro se

Foo