Title: Disciplinary Counsel v. Hale

State: ohio

Issuer: Ohio Supreme Court

Document:

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Hale, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2016-Ohio-____.] 
 
 
 
 
 
DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. HALE. 
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Hale, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2016-Ohio-5079.] 
(No. 2013-1622—Submitted July 21, 2016—Decided July 25, 2016.) 
ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. 
____________________ 
{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an 
application for reinstatement by respondent, Harland Hanna Hale, Attorney 
Registration No. 0023464, last known business address in Columbus, Ohio. 
{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of November 18, 2014, 
wherein the court, pursuant to former Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended 
respondent from the practice of law for a period of six months, finds that 
respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of 
Gov.Bar R. V(24). 
{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to 
the practice of law in the state of Ohio. 
{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies 
of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be 
made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2). 
{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Hale, 141 Ohio St.3d 
518, 2014-Ohio-5053, 26 N.E.3d 785. 
O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, KENNEDY, 
FRENCH, and O’NEILL, JJ., concur. 
________________________