Title: Gunzl v. New Castle County

State: delaware

Issuer: Delaware Supreme Court

Document:

Gunzl v. New Castle County  Download PDF IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ANTHONY GUNZL, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. NEW CASTLE COUNTY, a Political Entity, PAUL REYNOLDS, BROOKSIDE CIVIC ASSOCIATION and ROSE YANNES, Defendants Below, Appellees. § § § § No. 163, 1999 § § Court Below: Superior Court § of the State of Delaware in and § for New Castle County § C.A. Nos. 93-09-089 and § 06C-01-070 § § § § § Submitted: May 16, 2000 Decided: May 17, 2000 Before VEASEY, Chief Justice, WALSH, and HOLLAND, Justices. ORDER This 17th day of May 2000, upon consideration of the briefs of the parties, the Court concludes that the Superior Court properly exercised its discretion in refusing appellant the opportunity to further amend the complaint in view of the extended history of this case, including this Court s affirmance of the previous decision of the Superior Court dismissing New Castle County and Paul Reynolds as parties in the underlying litigation. Gunzl v. New Castle County and Paul Reynolds, Del. Supr., No. 485, 1999, Walsh, J., (June 21, 1996) (ORDER). NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior Court be, and the same hereby is, AFFIRMED. BY THE COURT: s/Joseph T. Walsh Justice