Title: Grandinetti v. Oshiro

State: hawaii

Issuer: Hawaii Supreme Court

Document:

No. 28407

12 aw Looe

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAL'T

 

 

FRANCIS ANTHONY GRANDINETTI, IT, Petitioners

82:2 Hy

STANTON C. OSHIRO and CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT,
Respondents.

 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
(CR. NO. 93-141)

RDF
(By: Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, 33.)
Upon consideration of petitioner Francis Grandinetti,
II's “application for an appellate injunction and supervisory
da petition for a writ of

 

mandamus remedy,” which is de
mandamus and the papers in support,
fails to demonstrate a clear and indisputable right to the relief
requested and petitioner is not entitled to a writ of mandamus.
See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai'i 200, 204-205, 982 P.2d 334, 338-
329 (1999) (A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that
will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and
indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to
redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested

it appears that petitioner

action.). Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of

mandamus is denied.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, March 21, 2007.

 

Francis Grandinetti, It,

prose, on the petition
MiaGhdornse
Piascien Canon Tt
(CP
Goren 6g +

ase