Title: OSCAR ORTIZ v. STATE FARM LLOYDS; from Bexar County; 4th Court of Appeals District (04-17-00252-CV, 568 SW3d 156, 11-08-17) (Concurring and Dissenting)

State: texas

Issuer: Texas Supreme Court

Document:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 17-1048 444444444444 OSCAR ORTIZ, PETITIONER, v. STATE FARM LLOYDS, RESPONDENT 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 ON PETITION FOR REVIEW FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 CHIEF JUSTICE HECHT, joined by JUSTICE BROWN and JUSTICE BLACKLOCK, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I join Parts I, II, III-A, III-B, and III-C of the Court’s opinion. For the reasons I explain today in dissent from the Court’s opinion in Barbara Technologies Corp. v. State Farm Lloyds,1 I dissent from Part III-D and from the Court’s judgment insofar as it does not affirm the court of appeals’ judgment in full. Nathan L. Hecht Chief Justice Opinion delivered: June 28, 2019 1 ___ S.W.3d ___ (Tex. 2019).