Title: Koropatnicki v. State

State: north-dakota

Issuer: North Dakota Supreme Court

Document:

Koropatnicki v. State Filed Apr. 2, 2009[Download as WordPerfect]IN THE SUPREME COURTSTATE OF NORTH DAKOTA2009 ND 31 Freeman Koropatnicki, Petitioner and Appellant v. State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee No. 20080235 Appeal from the District Court of Stustman County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable John E. Greenwood, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Freeman P. Koropatnicki (on brief), pro se, P.O. Box 5521, Bismarck, N.D. 58506-5521, petitioner and appellant. Jay A. Schmitz (on brief), Assistant State's Attorney, 511 2nd Avenue SE, Jamestown, N.D. 58401, for respondent and appellee. Koropatnicki v. State No. 20080235 Per Curiam. [¶1] Freeman Koropatnicki appealed from an order denying his amended application for post-conviction relief. On appeal, Koropatnicki argues that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial, on his previous appeal, and in his post-conviction proceedings; that there was insufficient evidence to support the conviction; that he was denied due process of law and fundamental fairness; and that the trial judge was biased against him. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). [¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Carol Ronning Kapsner Mary Muehlen Maring Daniel J. Crothers Dale V. Sandstrom