Title: Interest of N.F.F.

State: north-dakota

Issuer: North Dakota Supreme Court

Document:

Interest of N.F.F.  Court Description: 160 An appeal from a juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2018 ND 160 In the Interest of N.F.F., a child Danielle Tinquist, L.S.W., Cass County Social Services, Petitioner and Appellee v. N.F.F., a child, M.F., father, and Lisa Borseth, Guardian ad Litem Respondents and H.T., mother, Respondent and Appellant No. 20180219 In the Interest of N.F.F., a child Danielle Tinquist, L.S.W., Cass County Social Services, Petitioner and Appellee v. N.F.F., a child, M.F., father, and Lisa Borseth, Guardian ad Litem Respondents and H.T., mother, Respondent and Appellant No. 20180220 In the Interest of N.C.T., a child Danielle Tinquist, L.S.W., Cass County Social Services, Petitioner and Appellee v. N.C.T., a child, M.F., father, and Lisa Borseth, Guardian ad Litem Respondents and H.T., mother, Respondent and Appellant No. 20180221 Appeal from the Juvenile Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Scott A. Griffeth, Judicial Referee. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Constance L. Cleveland, Assistant State's Attorney, Fargo, ND, for petitioner and appellee; submitted on brief. Daniel E. Gast, Fargo, ND, for respondent and appellant; submitted on brief. Interest of N.F.F., N.F.F. and N.C.T.Nos. 20180219, 20180220 & 20180221 Per Curiam. [¶1] H.T. appealed from a juvenile court order terminating her parental rights to N.F.F., N.F.F., and N.C.T. The juvenile court found the children are deprived, the conditions and causes of the deprivation are likely to continue, the children are suffering or will probably suffer serious harm in the future, and that reasonable efforts were made to keep the family together. On appeal, the mother argues there was not clear and convincing evidence to support a termination of her parental rights. We conclude the juvenile court's findings are supported by clear and convincing evidence and are not clearly erroneous. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). [¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Jerod E. Tufte Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jon J. Jensen