Title: State v. Wright

State: ohio

Issuer: Ohio Supreme Court

Document:

[Cite as State v. Wright, 98 Ohio St.3d 1212, 2003-Ohio-1488.] 
1 
 
 
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. WRIGHT, APPELLANT. 
[Cite as State v. Wright, 98 Ohio St.3d 1212, 2003-Ohio-1488.] 
Certification of conflict dismissed as improvidently certified due to want of a 
conflict. 
(No. 2002-0234 — Submitted February 25, 2003 — Decided April 9, 2003.) 
CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Washington County, No. 00CA39, 2001-
Ohio-2473. 
__________________ 
{¶1} 
The certification of conflict is dismissed, sua sponte, as having 
been improvidently certified; there is want of a conflict. 
 
RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, COONEY, LUNDBERG STRATTON and O’CONNOR, 
JJ., concur. 
 
MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, J., dissent. 
 
COLLEEN CONWAY COONEY, J., of the Eighth Appellate District, sitting for 
COOK, J. 
__________________ 
 
Michael G. Spahr, Washington County Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. 
 
Carol A. Wright, for appellant. 
 
Jim Petro, Attorney General, David M. Gormley, State Solicitor, and Kirk 
A. Lindsey, Associate Solicitor, urging affirmance for amicus curiae Attorney 
General of Ohio. 
 
David L. Doughten and Paul Skendelas, urging reversal for amicus curiae 
Ohio Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. 
__________________