Title: State ex rel. Cultice v. Indus. Comm.

State: ohio

Issuer: Ohio Supreme Court

Document:

[Cite as State ex rel. Cultice v. Indus. Comm., 91 Ohio St.3d 572, 2001-Ohio-
118.] 
1 
 
 
THE STATE EX REL. CULTICE, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF 
OHIO, APPELLEE. 
[Cite as State ex rel. Cultice v. Indus. Comm. (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 572.] 
Workers’ compensation — Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. 
(No. 00-2005 — Submitted April 24, 2001 — Decided June 6, 2001.) 
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 99AP-1404. 
__________________ 
 
The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the 
opinion of the court of appeals. 
 
MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. 
 
DOUGLAS, RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent. 
__________________ 
 
DOUGLAS, J., dissenting.  I respectfully dissent.  I would reverse the 
judgment of the court of appeals and grant appellant relief in accordance with 
State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666. 
 
RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting 
opinion. 
__________________ 
 
Law Offices of James R. Nein and Brian W. Harter, for appellant. 
 
Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Kimberly M. Connett, 
Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. 
__________________