Title: State v. Matsuda

State: hawaii

Issuer: Hawaii Supreme Court

Document:

No. 28766

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAZ'r

 

STATE OF HAWAT'T
Respondent /Plaintiff-Appellee

 

vs.

aame

ALISON NOBORU MATSUDA,
Petitioner /Defendant-Appel lant

Jone 29 avis
suing NSW ig

C66 WY OF AVWE

 

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT
(cR. NO. 06-1-123)

prsurs: BOR
(By: Moon, C.J. for the court’)

upon consideration of the application for transfer
filed by petitioner/defendant-appellant Alison Noboru Matsuda on
May 5, 2008, the papers in support and the record, it appears
that the application for transfer was filed by petitioner pro se,
but that petitioner is represented by appointed appellate
counsel. Petitioner has not obtained appointed counsel's
discharge pursuant to HRAP 50(c) or withdrawal from the appellate
court or the circuit court pursuant to HRAP 50(b), and petitioner
does not have a constitutional right to hybrid representation
State v, Hirano, 8 Haw. App. 230, 333-36, 802 P.24 482, 484-85,

cert. denied, 71 Haw. 668, 833 P.24 901 (1990). Therefore,

 

IT 18 HEREBY ORDERED that the application for transfer

ie dismesed without prejudice to an application for transfer

 

+ Considered by: Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, J.
filed by appointed counsel of record or by petitioner pro se upon
appointed counsel's discharge or withdrawal effected by the
appellate court or the circuit court.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, May 30, 2008.

 

No. 26768, State wv. Matsuda--Order Dismissing Application for
‘Transfer