Title: State ex rel. Jaynor v. The Gerstenslager Co.

State: ohio

Issuer: Ohio Supreme Court

Document:

THE STATE EX REL. JAYNOR, APPELLANT, v. THE GERSTENSLAGER COMPANY ET AL., 
APPELLEES. 
[Cite as State ex rel. Jaynor v. The Gerstenslager Co. (1999), 87 Ohio St.3d 278.] 
Workers’ compensation — Complaint in mandamus alleging that Industrial 
Commission abused its discretion in denying claim for wage-loss 
compensation — Denial of writ affirmed, when. 
(No. 97-2527 — Submitted November 17, 1999 — Decided December 22, 1999.) 
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 96APD08-1024. 
 
Appellant-claimant, Ronald Jaynor, was injured in an industrial accident in 
December 1986.  His workers’ compensation claim was allowed for “acute lumbar 
sprain.”  Claimant received three years of temporary total disability compensation 
before those benefits were terminated based on maximum medical improvement. 
 
Claimant apparently never returned to his former position of employment 
with appellee The Gerstenslager Company.  In September 1993, claimant obtained 
a part-time job at a local school. 
 
On December 26, 1995, claimant applied for wage-loss compensation from 
December 19, 1990, forward.  He also moved for the additional allowance of a 
herniated disc condition.  A district hearing officer for appellee Industrial 
Commission of Ohio denied the additional allowance and also denied wage-loss 
compensation, writing: 
 
“The entire period from 12/19/1990 through 12/25/1993 is not payable 
because no request for payment of wage-loss was made within two years.  From 
12/26/93 through 03/28/96, the claimant has not proven that he has a wage-loss 
compensable pursuant to R.C. 4123.56(B).  The claimant has presented no 
persuasive medical evidence during the period from 12/26/1993 to 03/28/1996, he 
had physical restrictions which preclude him from performing the duties of his 
former position of employment. 
 
2
 
“Furthermore, the claimant submitted no proof of a job search and his part-
time work at St. Joseph’s Montessori is not sufficient to eliminate the need to 
continue to, in good faith, seek full-time employment.  Accordingly, no wage-loss 
has been proven.” 
 
A staff hearing officer affirmed at a hearing on May 22, 1996, adding: 
 
“At hearing, claimant testified he has earned more since 02/03/1996 than he 
was making before his injury, so Wage Loss Compensation since that date is 
denied as no actual wage loss is shown. 
 
“Claimant’s testimony at hearing [that] he occasionally sought additional 
work after obtaining part-time employment as a janitor at St. Joseph Montessori 
School is found not to rise to the level of a good faith effort to obtain suitable 
employment consistent with an award of wage loss compensation.” 
 
Further appeal was refused by the commission. 
 
Claimant filed a complaint in mandamus in the Court of Appeals for 
Franklin County, alleging that the commission abused its discretion in denying 
wage-loss compensation.  The court of appeals denied the writ. 
 
This cause is now before this court upon an appeal as of right. 
__________________ 
 
John S. Heath, for appellant. 
 
Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease L.L.P., and Julie M. Larson, for appellee 
The Gerstenslager Company. 
 
Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Dennis L. Hufstader, Assistant 
Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission. 
__________________ 
 
Per Curiam.  The commission denied wage-loss compensation from 
December 19, 1990 through May 22, 1996.  The court of appeals upheld that 
decision, and we affirm. 
 
3
 
Claimant moved for wage-loss compensation on December 26, 1995.  
Consequently, the two-year statute of limitations in R.C. 4123.52 bars 
compensation prior to December 26, 1993—a point claimant conceded at the staff 
hearing.  The commission did not, therefore, abuse its discretion in denying wage-
loss compensation prior to December 26, 1993. 
 
We also find no abuse of discretion in the commission’s denial of wage-loss 
compensation from February 3, 1996 though May 22, 1996.  Claimant testified that 
he was earning as much over that period as he had at his former position of 
employment.  As such, claimant was not experiencing the actual wage-loss 
necessary to establish wage-loss compensation eligibility.  State ex rel. Watts v. 
Schottenstein Stores Corp. (1993), 68 Ohio St.3d 118, 623 N.E.2d 1202. 
 
We turn finally to the period December 26, 1993 through February 2, 1996.  
The commission denied wage-loss compensation during this time for two 
reasons—insufficient medical evidence and lack of good faith job search.  Because 
we find that the commission did not abuse its discretion as to the former reason, we 
find it unnecessary to address the latter. 
 
The medical evidence of record is replete with discussion of claimant’s  
nonallowed disc conditions.  Indeed, we do not find any relevant document that 
lacks at least a reference to these serious ailments.  Consistent with the 
commission’s 
determination, 
our 
review 
reveals 
no 
medical 
evidence 
substantiating that claimant’s alleged inability to return to his former position of 
employment is due solely to his allowed condition.  As such, claimant has failed to 
establish the requisite causal relationship between his allowed condition and his 
diminished earnings from December 26, 1993 through February 2, 1996. 
 
Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed. 
Judgment affirmed. 
 
4
 
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and 
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.