Title: Disciplinary Counsel v. Riek

State: ohio

Issuer: Ohio Supreme Court

Document:

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Riek, 127 Ohio St.3d 1258, 2010-Ohio-6088.] 
 
 
DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. RIEK. 
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Riek, 127 Ohio St.3d 1258, 2010-Ohio- 
6088.] 
(No. 2009-2244 — Submitted November 29, 2010 — Decided December 6, 
2010.) 
ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT 
__________________ 
{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an 
application for reinstatement by respondent, F. Benjamin Riek III, Attorney 
Registration No. 0022703, last known business address in Shaker Heights, Ohio. 
{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of April 12, 2010, 
wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a 
period of 18 months with 12 months stayed on condition, finds that respondent 
has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. 
V(10)(A).  Therefore, 
{¶ 3} It is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the 
practice of law in the state of Ohio. 
{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the Clerk of this court issue certified 
copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be 
made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the 
costs of publication. 
{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Riek, 125 Ohio St.3d 
46, 2010-Ohio-1556, 925 N.E.2d 980. 
 
BROWN, 
C.J., 
and 
PFEIFER, 
LUNDBERG 
STRATTON, 
O’CONNOR, 
O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur. 
______________________