Title: Mattison v. State

State: delaware

Issuer: Delaware Supreme Court

Document:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
ERIC MATTISON,  
 
Defendant Below- 
Appellant, 
 
v. 
 
STATE OF DELAWARE,  
 
           Plaintiff Below- 
Appellee. 
§ 
§  No. 672, 2011 
§ 
§ 
§  Court Below─Superior Court 
§  of the State of Delaware 
§  in and for New Castle County 
§  Cr. ID Nos. 1010019821 
§                      0403020073 
§                      0409002772 
§ 
 
                                         Submitted: March 23, 2012 
 
 
 
 
   Decided: March 30, 2012 
 
 
 
 
 
 
O R D E R  
 
 
This 30th day of March 2012, it appears to the Court that, on March 9, 
2012, the Clerk issued a notice to show cause why this appeal should not be 
dismissed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b) for the appellant’s failure 
to diligently prosecute his appeal by not filing his opening brief and 
appendix.  The appellant has failed to respond to the notice to show cause 
within the required 10-day period.  Therefore, dismissal of this action is 
deemed to be unopposed. 
 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme Court 
Rule 29(b), that this appeal is DISMISSED. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
BY THE COURT: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Carolyn Berger  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Justice