Title: State ex rel. Young v. Indus. Comm.

State: ohio

Issuer: Ohio Supreme Court

Document:

[Cite as State ex rel. Young v. Indus. Comm. , 93 Ohio St.3d 1218, 
2001-Ohio-1595] 
1 
 
 
THE STATE EX REL. YOUNG, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO 
ET AL., APPELLEES. 
[Cite as State ex rel. Young v. Indus. Comm. (2001), 93 Ohio St.3d 1218.] 
Workers’ compensation — Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. 
(No. 01-300 — Submitted September 18, 2001 — Decided October 31, 2001.) 
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 99AP-1255. 
__________________ 
 
The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the 
opinion of the court of appeals. 
 
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and 
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. 
__________________ 
 
Law Office of Thomas Tootle Co., L.P.A., and Thomas Tootle, for 
appellant. 
 
Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Erica L. Armbrust, Assistant 
Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission. 
 
Buckinghanm, Doolittle & Burroughs, L.L.P., and Richard A. Hernandez, 
for appellee Freight Sales, Inc. 
__________________