Title: State ex rel. Bray v. Indus. Comm.

State: ohio

Issuer: Ohio Supreme Court

Document:

[Cite as State ex rel. Bray v. Indus. Comm., 101 Ohio St.3d 203, 2004-Ohio-709.] 
1 
 
 
THE STATE EX REL. BRAY, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO 
ET AL., APPELLEES. 
[Cite as State ex rel. Bray v. Indus. Comm., 101 Ohio St.3d 203, 2004-Ohio-
709.] 
Workers’ compensation — Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. 
(No. 2003-1222 — Submitted January 12, 2004 — Decided March 3, 2004.) 
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 02AP-939, 2003-
Ohio-2885. 
__________________ 
{¶1} 
The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with 
the opinion of the court of appeals. 
 
MOYER, C.J., LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR and O’DONNELL, JJ., 
concur. 
 
RESNICK, J., dissents, would reverse, and would order relief pursuant to 
State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666. 
 
F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent, would reverse, and would order 
relief pursuant to State ex rel. Noll v. Indus. Comm. (1991), 57 Ohio St.3d 203, 
567 N.E.2d 245. 
__________________ 
 
Harris & Burgin, L.P.A., and Andrea L. Burns, for appellant. 
 
Jim Petro, Attorney General, and Phil Wright Jr., Assistant Attorney 
General, for appellee Industrial Commission. 
 
Michael K. Allen, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, Thomas E. 
Deye and Susan Marie Gertz, Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys, for appellee Simon 
L. Leis Jr. 
__________________