Title: State ex rel. Marston v. Indus. Comm.

State: ohio

Issuer: Ohio Supreme Court

Document:

[Cite as State ex rel. Marston v. Indus. Comm., 90 Ohio St.3d 569, 2001-Ohio-
225.] 
 
THE STATE EX REL. MARSTON, APPELLEE, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF 
OHIO, APPELLANT. 
[Cite as State ex rel. Marston v. Indus. Comm. (2001), 90 Ohio St.3d 569.] 
Workers’ compensation — Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. 
(No. 00-749 — Submitted November 14, 2000 — Decided January 17, 2001.) 
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 99AP-554. 
_______________ 
 
The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the 
opinion of the court of appeals. 
 
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and LUNDBERG 
STRATTON, JJ., concur. 
 
COOK, J., dissents. 
__________________ 
 
COOK, J., dissenting.  I agree with the rationale set forth in the dissenting 
opinion of Judge Deshler; therefore, I am unable to join the majority in affirming 
the judgment of the court of appeals. 
__________________ 
 
Becker, Reed & Tilton and Dennis A. Becker, for appellee. 
 
Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Thomas L. Reitz, Assistant 
Attorney General, for appellant. 
__________________