Title: Disciplinary Counsel v. Bandy

State: ohio

Issuer: Ohio Supreme Court

Document:

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. BANDY. 
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Bandy (1998), ___ Ohio St.3d ___.] 
(No. 97-1742 – Submitted and decided October 22, 1998.) 
ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. 
 
This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an 
application for reinstatement by respondent Judge Erwin J. Bandy, a.k.a. Erwin 
Jason Bandy, Attorney Registration No. 0025268, last known business address in 
Paulding, Ohio. 
 
The court coming now to consider its order of March 25, 1998, wherein the 
court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of 
two years with eighteen months of the suspension stayed, finds that respondent has 
substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. 
V(10)(A).  Therefore, 
 
IT IS ORDERED by this court that the last eighteen months of the two-year 
suspension of Judge Erwin J. Bandy, a.k.a. Erwin Jason Bandy, be and hereby are 
stayed, and further that respondent be and hereby is reinstated to the practice of 
law in the state of Ohio. 
 
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified 
copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be 
made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs 
of publication. 
 
For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Bandy (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 
291, 690 N.E.2d 1280. 
 
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and 
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.