Title: Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Somerlock

State: maryland

Issuer: Maryland Supreme Court

Document:

O R D E R 
 
 
Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Reprimand filed by Petitioner, the 
Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, and Respondent, Carl David Somerlock, on 
October 24, 2023, in which the parties advise that Respondent agrees that his conduct, as 
described in the Joint Petition, violated Rule 8.4(d) of the Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of 
Professional Conduct and that Respondent consents to a reprimand as the appropriate 
sanction, it is this 30th day of October 2023 
 
ORDERED, by the Supreme Court of Maryland, that Respondent, Carl David 
Somerlock, is REPRIMANDED for violating Rule 8.4(d) of the Maryland Attorneys’ 
Rules of Professional Conduct. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
        /s/ Shirley M. Watts 
 
    Senior Justice 
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE 
COMMISSION OF MARYLAND 
 
 
 
 
v. 
 
CARL DAVID SOMERLOCK 
* 
 
* 
 
* 
 
* 
 
* 
 
* 
     IN THE 
 
     SUPREME COURT 
 
     OF MARYLAND 
 
     AG No. 12 
 
     September Term, 2023     
Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials 
Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this 
document is authentic. 
 
Gregory Hilton, Clerk 
2023-10-30 12:21-04:00