Title: State v. Forbes

State: ohio

Issuer: Ohio Supreme Court

Document:

[Cite as State v. Forbes, 114 Ohio St.3d 40, 2007-Ohio-2714.] 
1 
 
 
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. FORBES, APPELLANT. 
[Cite as State v. Forbes, 114 Ohio St.3d 40, 2007-Ohio-2714.] 
Sex-offender-classification hearing – Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on the 
authority of State v. Wilson. 
(No. 2006-2294 — Submitted May 23, 2007 — Decided June 20, 2007.) 
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County,  
No. 87473, 2006-Ohio-5612. 
__________________ 
{¶1} 
The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority 
of State v. Wilson, 113 Ohio St.3d 382, 2007-Ohio-2202, 865 N.E.2d 1264. 
 
MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL, 
LANZINGER and CUPP, JJ., concur. 
__________________ 
 
William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Mary H. 
McGrath, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. 
 
 
David L. Doughten, for appellant. 
______________________