Title: State ex rel. Gauvey v. Indus. Comm.

State: ohio

Issuer: Ohio Supreme Court

Document:

[Cite as State ex rel. Gauvey v. Indus. Comm., 94 Ohio St.3d 38, 2002-Ohio-74.] 
1 
 
 
THE STATE EX REL. GAUVEY, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF 
OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES. 
[Cite as State ex rel. Gauvey v. Indus. Comm. (2002), 94 Ohio St.3d 38.] 
Workers’ compensation — Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. 
(No. 01-1144 — Submitted November 13, 2001 — Decided January 9, 2002.) 
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 00AP-979. 
__________________ 
 
The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the 
opinion of the court of appeals. 
 
MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. 
 
DOUGLAS, RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent. 
__________________ 
 
ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J., dissenting.  I would reverse the judgment of 
the court of appeals and grant relator the requested relief in accordance with State 
ex rel. Gay v. Mihm (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666. 
 
DOUGLAS and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting 
opinion. 
__________________ 
 
Lonas, McGonegal & Tsangeos and Terrance J. McGonegal, for 
appellant. 
 
Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Keith D. Blosser, Assistant 
Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission. 
 
Roetzel & Andress, Douglas E. Spiker and Noel C. Shepard, for appellee 
Handy & Harmon Automotive Group, Inc. 
__________________