Title: State ex rel. Tenoever v. Indus. Comm.

State: ohio

Issuer: Ohio Supreme Court

Document:

[Cite as State ex rel. Tenoever v. Indus. Comm. , 92 Ohio St.3d 70, 2001-Ohio-
135.] 
1 
 
 
THE STATE EX REL. TENOEVER, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF 
OHIO, APPELLEE. 
[Cite as State ex rel. Tenoever v. Indus. Comm. (2001), 92 Ohio St.3d 70.] 
Workers’ compensation — Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. 
(No. 00-1906 — Submitted April 24, 2001 — Decided June 13, 2001.) 
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 99AP-1349. 
__________________ 
 
The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the 
opinion of the court of appeals. 
 
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG 
STRATTON, JJ., concur. 
 
RESNICK, J., .dissents. 
__________________ 
 
ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J., dissenting.  I would reverse the judgment of 
the court of appeals. 
__________________ 
 
Butkovich, Schimpf, Schimpf & Ginocchio Co., L.P.A., and James A. 
Whittaker, for appellant. 
 
Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Dennis L. Hufstader, 
Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. 
__________________