Title: Hinderegger v. Dairy & Nutrition Council

State: ohio

Issuer: Ohio Supreme Court

Document:

OPINIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO                               
     The full texts of the opinions of the Supreme Court of                      
Ohio are being transmitted electronically beginning May 27,                      
1992, pursuant to a pilot project implemented by Chief Justice                   
Thomas J. Moyer.                                                                 
     Please call any errors to the attention of the Reporter's                   
Office of the Supreme Court of Ohio.  Attention:  Walter S.                      
Kobalka, Reporter, or Deborah J. Barrett, Administrative                         
Assistant.  Tel.:  (614) 466-4961; in Ohio 1-800-826-9010.                       
Your comments on this pilot project are also welcome.                            
     NOTE:  Corrections may be made by the Supreme Court to the                  
full texts of the opinions after they have been released                         
electronically to the public.  The reader is therefore advised                   
to check the bound volumes of Ohio St.3d published by West                       
Publishing Company for the final versions of these opinions.                     
The advance sheets to Ohio St.3d will also contain the volume                    
and page numbers where the opinions will be found in the bound                   
volumes of the Ohio Official Reports.                                            
                                                                                 
Hinderegger, Appellee, v. Dairy & Nutrition Council, Appellant.                  
[Cite as Hinderegger v. Dairy & Nutrition Council (1994),                        
Ohio St.3d    .]                                                                 
Discrimination -- Age discrimination claim based on violation                    
     described in R.C. Chapter 4112 must comply with                             
     one-hundred-eighty-day statute of limitations period set                    
     forth in R.C. 4112.02(N).                                                   
     (Nos. 94-74 and 94-75 -- Submitted October 25, 1994 --                      
Decided November 16, 1994.)                                                      
     Certified by and Appeal from the Court of Appeals for                       
Stark County, No. CA-9297.                                                       
                                                                                 
     Green, Haines, Sgambati, Murphy & Macala Co., L.P.A.,                       
Randall Vehar, Ronald G. Macala and Shawn C. Groff, for                          
appellee.                                                                        
     Frost & Jacobs, Thomas V. Williams and Laurie A. Belan,                     
for appellant.                                                                   
                                                                                 
     The judgment of the court of appeals in case No. 94-74 is                   
reversed on the authority of Bellian v. Bicron Corp. (1994), 69                  
Ohio St.3d 517, 634 N.E.2d 608.                                                  
     The discretionary appeal in case No. 94-75 is denied.                       
     Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Wright, Resnick and F.E.                         
Sweeney, JJ., concur.                                                            
     Douglas and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.