Title: State ex rel. Dunn v. Indus. Comm.

State: ohio

Issuer: Ohio Supreme Court

Document:

[Cite as State ex rel. Dunn v. Indus. Comm., 96 Ohio St.3d 191, 2002-Ohio-3955.] 
1 
 
 
THE STATE EX REL. DUNN, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, 
APPELLEE, ET AL. 
[Cite as State ex rel. Dunn v. Indus. Comm., 96 Ohio St.3d 191, 2002-Ohio-3955.] 
Workers’ compensation — Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. 
(No. 2001-2159 — Submitted June 26, 2002 — Decided August 21, 2002.) 
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 01AP-241. 
__________________ 
{¶1} 
The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the 
opinion of the court of appeals. 
 
MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. 
 
DOUGLAS, RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent. 
__________________ 
 
ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J., dissenting. 
{¶2} 
I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and return the 
cause to the Industrial Commission for relief consistent with State ex rel. Gay v. 
Mihm (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666. 
 
DOUGLAS and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion. 
__________________ 
 
Harris & Burgin and Andrea L. Burns, for appellant. 
 
Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Erica L. Bass, Assistant 
Attorney General, for appellee. 
 
Philip J. Fulton Law Office, Philip J. Fulton, William A. Thorman III and 
Jonathan H. Goodman, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Ohio Academy of Trial 
Lawyers. 
__________________