Title: Kavanaugh v. West Sonoma Cty. USD

State: california

Issuer: California Supreme Court

Document:

Filed 4/16/03 
 
 
 
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA 
 
 
 
ALTA KAVANAUGH, 
) 
 
 
) 
 
Plaintiff and Respondent, 
) 
 
 
) 
S101633 
 
v. 
) 
 
 
) 
Ct.App. 1/1 A093779 
WEST SONOMA COUNTY UNION  
) 
HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., 
) 
 
) 
Sonoma County 
 
Defendants and Appellants. 
) 
Super. Ct. No. 224982 
___________________________________ ) 
BY THE COURT: 
MODIFICATION OF OPINION 
 
 
The opinion in this case, which was filed on January 30, 2003, and 
appears at 29 Cal.4th 911, is modified as follows: 
 
The second sentence of the first full paragraph on page 918 is 
modified by replacing the word “reelect” with “retain,” and the words “not 
reelecting her” with “not doing so.”  As modified, the sentence reads: “If 
Kavanaugh is considered a probationary employee, the District was obligated to 
retain her for the following year because it failed to notify her by March 15th of 
the school year that it was considering not doing so for economic reasons.”  
 
This modification does not affect the judgment.