Title: Paitsel v. State

State: delaware

Issuer: Delaware Supreme Court

Document:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
DAVID E. PAITSEL, SR.,  
 
Defendant Below- 
Appellant, 
 
v. 
 
STATE OF DELAWARE,  
 
           Plaintiff Below- 
Appellee. 
§ 
§  No. 124, 2012 
§ 
§ 
§  Court Below─Superior Court 
§  of the State of Delaware 
§  in and for Kent County 
§  Cr. ID No. 1107021412 
§ 
§ 
§ 
 
                                         Submitted: June 15, 2012 
 
 
 
 
   Decided: July 23, 2012 
 
 
 
 
 
 
O R D E R  
 
 
This 23rd day of July 2012, it appears to the Court that, on May 25, 2012, the 
Clerk issued a notice to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed 
pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b) for the appellant’s failure to diligently 
prosecute his appeal by not filing his opening brief and appendix.  The appellant 
has failed to respond to the notice to show cause within the required 10-day period.  
Therefore, dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed. 
 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 
29(b), that this appeal is DISMISSED. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
BY THE COURT: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Henry duPont Ridgely 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Justice