Title: Small v. State

State: south-carolina

Issuer: South Carolina Supreme Court

Document:

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR. THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Clarence Small, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent. Appeal from Aiken County Doyet A. Early,III, Circuit Court Judge ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI Memorandum Opinion No. 2008-MO-021 Submitted April 1, 2008 Filed May 12, 2008 AFFIRMED Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of South Carolina Commission on Indigent Defense Division of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for petitioner. Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Lance S. Boozer, of Columbia, for respondent. PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authority: Suber v. State, 371 S.C. 554, 640 S.E.2d 884 (2007) (this Court will uphold findings of the PCR judge when there is any evidence of probative value to support them); Jackson v. State, 329 S.C. 345, 495 S.E.2d 768 (1998) (relief denied because no prejudice resulted from failure to call witnesses where no additional information would have been supplied). TOAL, C.J., MOORE, WALLER, PLEICONES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.