Title: Sandoval v. Department of Transportation

State: north-dakota

Issuer: North Dakota Supreme Court

Document:

Sandoval v. Department of Transportation Filed Feb. 21, 2008[Download as WordPerfect]IN THE SUPREME COURTSTATE OF NORTH DAKOTA2008 ND 22 William Sandoval, Petitioner and Appellant v. Department of Transportation, Respondent and Appellee No. 20070295 Appeal from the District Court of Stark County, Southwest Judicial District, the Honorable Allan L. Schmalenberger, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Kelly M. Armstrong (appeared) and Ashley Holmes (argued), third-year law student, of Reichert Armstrong Law Office, 513 Elks Drive, Dickinson, N.D. 58601, for petitioner and appellant. Andrew Moraghan (argued), Assistant Attorney General, Office of Attorney General, 500 N. 9th St., Bismarck, N.D. 58501-4509, for respondent and appellee. Sandoval v. Department of Transportation No. 20070295 Per Curiam. [¶1] William Sandoval appeals from a district court judgment affirming a North Dakota Department of Transportation order revoking Sandoval's driving privileges for three years. Sandoval argued the arresting officer did not have reasonable and articulable suspicion to stop his vehicle. We conclude the agency's order is supported by a preponderance of the evidence and summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5). [¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Mary Muehlen Maring Daniel J. Crothers Dale V. Sandstrom Carol Ronning Kapsner