Title: Maddox v. CitiMortgage, Inc.

State: delaware

Issuer: Delaware Supreme Court

Document:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
LEO R. MADDOX, 
 
 
§ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
§ 
No. 150, 2014 
 
 
Plaintiff Below, 
 
§ 
Appellant, 
§ 
Court Below–Superior Court of   
§ 
the State of Delaware in and for  
 
v. 
 
 
 
 
§ 
Kent County 
 
 
 
 
 
 
§ 
CITIMORTGAGE, INC., 
 
§  
C.A. No. K13C-02-027 
 
 
 
 
 
 
§ 
 
 
Defendant Below,  
§ 
 
 
Appellee. 
 
 
§ 
 
Submitted: April 21, 2014 
  Decided: June 5, 2014 
 
Before BERGER, JACOBS and RIDGELY, Justices. 
 
O R D E R 
 
 
This 5th day of June 2014, having considered the opening brief filed 
by the appellant, Leo R. Maddox (“Maddox”), and the motion to affirm filed 
by the appellee, CitiMortgage, Inc. (“Citi”), we have determined, upon de 
novo review of the record, that the Superior Court did not err by dismissing 
Maddox’s civil action against Citi.  We further conclude that the dismissal of 
Maddox’s complaint and the denial of his motion for reargument should be 
affirmed on the basis of, and for the reasons stated in, the Superior Court 
orders dated December 13, 2013 and February 28, 2014.* 
                                
* Maddox v. CitiMortgage, Inc., 2014 WL 1155312 (Del. Super. Feb. 28, 2014); Maddox 
v. CitiMortgage, Inc., C.A. No. K13-02-027 (Del. Super. Dec. 13, 2013) (Letter and 
Order). 
2 
 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to affirm is 
GRANTED.  The judgments of the Superior Court are AFFIRMED. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
BY THE COURT:  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Jack B. Jacobs 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
       Justice