Title: Scarborough v. State

State: delaware

Issuer: Delaware Supreme Court

Document:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
ROGER O. SCARBOROUGH, 
 
Defendant Below, 
Appellant, 
 
v. 
 
STATE OF DELAWARE, 
 
Plaintiff Below, 
Appellee. 
§ 
§  No. 288, 2003 
§ 
§  Court Below:  Superior Court 
§  of the State of Delaware 
§  in and for Kent County 
§ 
§  Cr. ID No. 0110004472 
§ 
§ 
§
 
 
O R D E R 
 
This  26th   day of September 2003, it appears to the Court that, on September 25, 
2003, the Clerk of this Court issued a notice to show cause why this appeal should not be 
dismissed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b) for the appellant’s failure to diligently 
prosecute the appeal by not filing his opening brief and appendix.  The appellant has failed 
to respond to the notice to show cause within the required ten-day period; therefore, 
dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed. 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme Court 
Rules 3(b) and 29(b), that the within appeal is DISMISSED. 
 
BY THE COURT: 
 
s/s Randy J. Holland           
Justice