Title: Weinstein v. Roberts, et al.

State: delaware

Issuer: Delaware Supreme Court

Document:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
ALLAN WEINSTEIN,  
 
 
§ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
§ 
No. 17, 2006 
 
 
 
Plaintiff Below, 
 
§ 
 
 
 
Appellant,  
 
§ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
§ 
v. 
§ 
Court Below: 
§ 
Superior Court of the 
JOHN ROBERTS, SHELLY ROBERTS, 
§ 
State of Delaware in 
BETHANY AUTO PARTS, INC., and 
§ 
and for Sussex County 
ROBERTS REPAIR SERVICE, INC., 
§ 
C.A. No. 04C-03-020 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
§ 
 
 
 
Defendants Below, 
 
§ 
 
 
 
Appellees.  
 
§ 
 
Submitted:  September 13, 2006 
Decided:  September 14, 2006 
 
Before HOLLAND, BERGER and RIDGELY, Justices. 
 
O R D E R 
 
 
This 14th day of September, 2006, the Court, having considered the 
Superior Court bench ruling and Order dated December 12, 2005, the 
Corrected Order dated January 5, 2006, and the arguments and briefs of the 
parties, has determined that:  to the extent the issues raised on appeal are 
factual, the record evidence supports the trial judge’s factual findings; to the 
extent the errors alleged on appeal are attributed to an abuse of discretion, 
the record does not support those assertions; and to the extent that the issues 
raised on appeal are legal, they are controlled by settled Delaware law, 
which was properly applied.  Accord:  Schnell v. Chris-Craft Industries, Inc., 
 
2
Del.Supr., 285 A.2d 437 (1971); Rossdeutscher v. Viacom, Inc., Del.Supr., 
768 A.2d 8 (2001). 
 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the 
Superior Court be, and the same hereby is 
 
AFFIRMED. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
BY THE COURT: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Carolyn Berger 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Justice