Title: Cambra v. Maui Pineapple Company, Ltd.

State: hawaii

Issuer: Hawaii Supreme Court

Document:

Wo. 25932

2
3

 

BARBARA J. CAMBRA, Claimant-Respondent,

Lv
a
WZ -O1HY

MAUI PINEAPPLE COMPANY, LTD., Employer-Petitioner, Self-Insure

and
SEABURY HALL,
and

HIM AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY OF HAWAII, INC.,
Employer /Insurance Carrie-Respondent.

 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
(CASE NOS. AB 2001-369), 7-€9-00854, 7-00-02932)

‘ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION

w cE
(By: Levinson, J, for the court’)

It appearing that the judgment on appeal in the above-
referenced matter has not been entered by the Intermediate Court

of Appeals, see Hawai'i Revised Statutes § 602-59(a), as amended

by Act 149 of the 2006 Hawai'i Session Laws; gee also Hawai'i

Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 36(b) (1) (2006),

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that employer-petitioner, self-

insured Maui Pineapple Company, Ltd.'s application for certiorari,

fled September &, 2006, is dismissed without prejudice to re-

filing the application pursuant to HRAP Rule 40.1(a) ("No later

2 court: Moon, C.J-, Levinson, Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, 09,

qawd
than 90 days after the filing of the intermediate court of

appeals’ judgment on appeal or dismis:

1 order, any party may

 

apply in writing to the supreme court for a writ of certiorari.”).

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, September 11, 2006.

Darlene Y.F. Itomura
of Wong & Oshima, for
Employer-Petitioner, Self-
Insured Maui Pineapple
Company, Ltd.

FOR THE COURT:

STEVEN H. LEVINS
Associate Justica

FER