Title: Freddy Nobriga Enterprises, Inc. v. State

State: hawaii

Issuer: Hawaii Supreme Court

Document:

‘*** NOT FOR PUBLICATION ***
No, 27358
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

 

FREDDY NOBRIGA ENTERPRISES, INC. and ALFRED NOBRIGA,
Plaintiffs /Counterclaim-Defendants-Appellants,
vs. uo g

        
  
  

STATE OF HAWAI'I DEPARTMENT OF HAWAIIAN HOME
MICAH KANE and LINDA CHINN,
Defendants /Counterclaimants-Appellees.

ozs

x
:

APPEAL FROM THE THIRD CIRCUIT COURT, HILD§
(crv. NO. 03-1-0217)

&
(ey: Hakayanay J for the court?)

upon review of the statements supporting and contesting
Jurisdiction, appellee's motion to dismiss appeal, the papers in
support and in opposition and the record, it appears that final
judgment has not been entered in Civil No. 03-1-0217. The
March 14, 2005 order granting defendant's motion for a temporary
restraining order and denying plaintiffs’ counter motion for a
preliminary injunction is not a final order innediately
appealabie under the collaterel order or Fargay doctrines. Thus,
we lack jurisdiction. See HRS § 641-1(a). Therefore,

IP 1S HEREBY ORDERED that this appeal ‘a dismissed for
lack of appellate jurisdiction.

DATED: Honclulu, Hawai'i, September 22, 2005.

FOR THE COURT:

Associate Justice

 

‘considered by: Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy,

 

a3.