Title: State v. Donte Quintell McBride

State: wisconsin

Issuer: Wisconsin Supreme Court

Document:

2023 WI 68 
 
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CASE NO.: 
2021AP311-CR 
 
 
 
COMPLETE TITLE: 
State of Wisconsin, 
          Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner, 
     v. 
Donte Quintell McBride, 
          Defendant-Appellant. 
 
 
 
 
 
REVIEW OF DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS  
Reported at 405 Wis. 2d 771,985 N.W.2d 452 
(2023 – unpublished) 
 
 
OPINION FILED: 
October 10, 2023   
SUBMITTED ON BRIEFS: 
        
ORAL ARGUMENT: 
September 15, 2023   
 
 
SOURCE OF APPEAL: 
 
 
COURT: 
Circuit  
 
COUNTY: 
Milwaukee   
 
JUDGE: 
Jonathan D. Watts   
 
 
 
JUSTICES: 
 
Per Curiam.  
NOT PARTICIPATING: 
Janet C. Protasiewicz, J.      
 
 
 
ATTORNEYS: 
 
For the plaintiff-respondent-petitioner, there were briefs 
filed by Kieran M. O’Day, assistant attorney general, with whom 
on the brief was Joshua L. Kaul, attorney general.  There was an 
oral argument by Kieran M. O’Day, assistant attorney general.  
 
For the defendant-appellant, there was a brief filed by 
Jill M. Skwor, assistant state public defender. There was an 
oral argument by Jill M. Skwor, assistant state public defender. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2023 WI 68 
NOTICE 
This opinion is subject to further 
editing and modification.  The final 
version will appear in the bound 
volume of the official reports.   
No.   2021AP311-CR 
(L.C. No. 2018CF5172) 
STATE OF WISCONSIN  
 
 
   : 
IN SUPREME COURT 
 
 
State of Wisconsin, 
 
          Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner, 
 
     v. 
 
Donte Quintell McBride, 
 
          Defendant-Appellant.   
FILED 
 
OCT 10, 2023 
 
Samuel A. Christensen 
Clerk of Supreme Court 
 
 
 
 
REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals.  Affirmed.    
 
¶1 
PER CURIAM.   The decision of the court of appeals is 
affirmed by an equally divided court. 
¶2 
JANET C. PROTASIEWICZ, J., did not participate. 
 
 
No. 
2021AP311-CR   
 
 
 
1