Title: Proctor v. State

State: delaware

Issuer: Delaware Supreme Court

Document:

See Proctor v.  State, Del.  Supr., No.  483, 2005, Berger, J.  (Nov.  2, 2006) (order denying motion
*
for stay) (directing that Clerk issue notice to show cause for Proctor’s failure to file opening brief and
appendix where Proctor was otherwise able to file numerous letters and motions in support of appeal and
had received three extensions of time).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
RONALD E.  PROCTOR, JR.,
§
§
No.  483, 2005
Plaintiff Below,
§
Appellant,
§
Court Below--Superior Court 
§
of the State of Delaware in and 
v.
§
for Kent County
§
STATE OF DELAWARE,
§
§
Defendant Below,
§
C.A. No.  00A-12-003
Appellee.
§
Submitted:
November 13, 2006
Decided:
December 27, 2006
Before STEELE, Chief Justice, HOLLAND and JACOBS, Justices.
O R D E R
This 27  day of December, it appears that the Clerk issued a notice directing that the
th
appellant, Ronald E.  Proctor, Jr., show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for his
failure to file the opening brief and appendix.   Proctor’s response to the notice does not establish
*
good cause why this appeal should not be dismissed.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b), that the
appeal is DISMISSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Jack B. Jacobs 
          Justice