Title: Disciplinary Counsel v. Allen

State: ohio

Issuer: Ohio Supreme Court

Document:

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Allen, 94 Ohio St.3d 1201, 2001-
Ohio-5093.] 
1 
 
 
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. ALLEN. 
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Allen (2001), 94 Ohio St.3d 1201.] 
(No. 00-1549 — Submitted and decided December 10, 2001.) 
ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. 
__________________ 
 
This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an 
application for reinstatement by respondent Craig A. Allen, a.k.a. Craig Adams 
Allen, Attorney Registration No. 0007261, last known address in Ironton, Ohio. 
 
The court coming now to consider its order of January 17, 2001, wherein 
the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period 
of eighteen months, with nine months stayed, finds that respondent has 
substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. 
V(10)(A).  Therefore, 
 
IT IS ORDERED by this court that Craig A. Allen, a.k.a. Craig Adams 
Allen, be and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. 
 
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified 
copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be 
made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the 
costs of publication. 
 
For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Allen (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 
27, 740 N.E.2d 1094. 
 
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and 
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. 
__________________