Title: The Florida Bar v. Nemec

State: florida

Issuer: Florida Supreme Court

Document:

390 So. 2d 1190 (1980)
THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,
v.
James NEMEC, Respondent.
No. 58451.

Supreme Court of Florida.
November 26, 1980.
James P. Hollaway, Deputy Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, Theodore Babbitt, Chairman of Grievance Committee 15 "C", West Palm Beach, and Harris K. Solomon, Branch Staff Counsel, Fort Lauderdale, for complainant.
James E. Weber of Weber & Fulton, West Palm Beach, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
This disciplinary proceeding by The Florida Bar against James Nemec a member of The Florida Bar, is presently before us on complaint of The Florida Bar and Report of Referee. Pursuant to Rule 11.06(9)(b) of the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar, the referee's report and record were duly filed with this court. No petition for review pursuant to Rule 11.09(1), Integration Rule, has been filed.
Having considered the pleadings and evidence, the referee filed the following report:
Having carefully reviewed the record, we approve the findings and recommendations of the referee.
Accordingly, respondent, James Nemec, is hereby publicly reprimanded, and the publication of this order and judgment shall constitute a public reprimand.
Execution is hereby directed to issue against respondent for costs in the amount of $2,028.48.
It is so ordered.
OVERTON, ENGLAND, ALDERMAN and McDONALD, JJ., concur.
BOYD, Acting Chief Justice, dissenting:
I would affirm finding, but would administer private reprimand.