Title: Saturn Surplus v. Brown & Brown Insurance Co., et al. (Per Curiam Order)

State: pennsylvania

Issuer: Pennsylvania Supreme Court

Document:

[J-126-2005] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT MARK AND ELIZABETH WISNISKI T/D/B/A SATURN SURPLUS v. BROWN & BROWN INS. CO. OF PA, DONALD BLOOD AND WILL RINEER, EMC INS. CO. AND SCOTT W. AHLSTROM APPEAL OF: BROWN & BROWN INS. CO. OF PA, DONALD BLOOD AND WILL RINEER : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : No. 30 MAP 2005 Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court entered on June 7, 2004 at Nos. 797 MDA 2003 and 876 MDA 2003, reversing in part and quashing in part the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County, Civil Division, entered on April 18, 2003 at No. 2320-CV-2000 852 A.2d 1206 (Pa. Super. 2004) ARGUED: December 5, 2005 ORDER PER CURIAM Decided: December 21, 2005 The decision of the Superior Court is hereby VACATED. The matter is remanded to the Superior Court for reconsideration of whether a duty exists by applying the five-prong test as set forth in Althaus v. Cohen, 756 A.2d 1166 (Pa. 2000), and for an opinion in support thereof. Jurisdiction relinquished. Mr. Justice Nigro did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.