Title: Barsamyan v. Super. Ct., App. Div.

State: california

Issuer: California Supreme Court

Document:

1 
Filed 10/1/08 
 
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA 
 
 
 
VARDUI ROSE BARSAMYAN, 
) 
 
 
) 
 
Petitioner, 
) 
 
 
)  
S148712 
 
v. 
) 
 
 
) 
Ct.App. 2/7 B188695 
APPELLATE DIVISION OF  
) 
THE SUPERIOR COURT  
)  
Los Angeles County 
OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, 
)  
Super. Ct. No. BS099858 
 
) 
 
Respondent; 
) 
 
 
) 
THE PEOPLE, 
) 
 
 
) 
 
Real Party in Interest. 
) 
___________________________________ ) 
 
 
MODIFICATION OF OPINION 
THE COURT: 
The opinion filed August 7, 2008, and published at 44 Cal.4th 960, is modified 
in the following respect: 
On page 966, the first sentence of the first paragraph is modified to read as 
follows:  “As we shall explain, we agree with the trial court and the majority in the 
Court of Appeal that when appointed defense counsel appears for trial in two matters, 
and the calendar court selects or requires counsel to select a single matter for trial and 
sends that matter to a trial department for trial, counsel necessarily consents to 
continuance of the remaining matter.” 
This modification does not affect the judgment.