Title: State v. Harris

State: north-dakota

Issuer: North Dakota Supreme Court

Document:

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2023 ND 193 State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Lawrence Alexander Harris, Defendant and Appellant No. 20230033 Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce A. Romanick, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Dennis H. Ingold, Assistant State’s Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for plaintiff and appellee. Kiara C. Kraus-Parr, Grand Forks, ND, for defendant and appellant. FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OCTOBER 11, 2023 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 1 State v. Harris No. 20230033 Per Curiam. [¶1] Lawrence Alexander Harris appeals from a criminal judgment and a district court order denying his motion to suppress evidence. On appeal, Harris argues the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence from the traffic stop of the vehicle in which he was a passenger because the officers did not have reasonable and articulable suspicion to conduct the stop. We conclude the district court did not err in denying Harris’ motion to suppress because there was reasonable and articulable suspicion to stop the vehicle. [¶2] While not argued in the district court, Harris also argues on appeal there was no reasonable and articulable basis to detain him following the stop of the vehicle. We decline to address this argument. State v. Dockter, 2019 ND 203, ¶ 8, 932 N.W.2d 98 (issues not raised or considered in the district court will not be addressed on appeal). We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). [¶3] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Douglas A. Bahr