Title: JHL Brighton Design/Decor Center, LLC et al. v. Chantz Enterprises, LLC, et al.

State: delaware

Issuer: Delaware Supreme Court

Document:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
JHL BRIGHTON DESIGN/DÉCOR 
CENTER, LLC, a Delaware limited 
liability company, and JENNIFER SOLT, 
 
Defendants Below- 
Appellants, 
 
v. 
 
CHANTZ ENTERPRISES, LLC, a 
Delaware limited liability company, and 
RANDY CHANCE, 
 
Plaintiffs Below- 
Appellees. 
§ 
§ 
§  No. 549, 2011 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§  Court Below—Superior Court 
§  of the State of Delaware, 
§  in and for New Castle County 
§  C.A. No. 09C-06-072 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§ 
 
Submitted: October 21, 2011 
Decided:  October 24, 2011 
 
Before HOLLAND, BERGER, and JACOBS, Justices. 
 
 
O R D E R 
 
This 24th day of October 2011, it appears to the Court that: 
(1) 
The defendants-appellants have petitioned this Court, pursuant to 
Supreme Court Rule 42, to accept an interlocutory appeal from the Superior 
Court’s orders denying a motion to enforce a settlement agreement and reargument 
thereof.   
(2) 
The defendants filed their application for certification to take an 
interlocutory appeal in the Superior Court on September 19, 2011.  The Superior 
Court denied the certification application on October 19, 2011. 
 
 
-2-
(3) 
Applications for interlocutory review are addressed to the sound 
discretion of this Court.  In the exercise of its discretion, this Court has concluded 
that the application for interlocutory review does not meet the requirements of 
Supreme Court Rule 42(b) and should be refused. 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the within 
interlocutory appeal be REFUSED. 
BY THE COURT: 
 
/s/ Carolyn Berger 
Justice