Title: Callistro v Bebbington

State: new-york

Issuer: New York Appellate Court

Document:

Callistro v Bebbington

2012 NY Slip Op 08444

Decided on December 11, 2012

Court of Appeals

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on December 11, 2012

No. 242 SSM 46
[*1]Musa Callistro, an Infant, by His Mother and Natural Guardian Jessica Rivera, Appellant,
vMichael W. Bebbington, M.D., et al., Respondents.

Submitted by John M. Daly, for appellant.
Submitted by Daniel S. Ratner, for respondents.


On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, with costs, and certified question not answered on the ground that it is unnecessary. Plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact concerning whether defendants' alleged malpractice in failing to perform a caesarean section rather than a vaginal delivery was the cause of child's alleged cognitive, receptive, and expressive deficits and developmental disability.
Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith and Pigott concur.
Decided December 11, 2012