Title: Disciplinary Counsel v. Furtado

State: ohio

Issuer: Ohio Supreme Court

Document:

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. FURTADO. 
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Furtado (1997), ___ Ohio St.3d ___.] 
 
(No. 94-536 — Submitted and decided October 24, 1997.) 
 
ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. 
 
This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an 
application for reinstatement by respondent Lorraine T. Furtado, a.k.a. Lorraine 
Theresa Furtado, Attorney Registration No. 0034627, last known address in 
Columbus, Ohio. 
 
The court coming now to consider its order of November 23, 1994, wherein 
the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period 
of two years with credit for time served, finds that respondent has substantially 
complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A).  
Therefore, 
 
IT IS ORDERED by this court that Lorraine T. Furtado, a.k.a. Lorraine 
Theresa Furtado, be and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of 
Ohio. 
 
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified 
copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be 
made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs 
of publication. 
 
For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Furtado (1997), 71 Ohio St.3d 
20, 641 N.E.2d 184. 
 
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and 
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.