Title: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Yamada

State: hawaii

Issuer: Hawaii Supreme Court

Document:

No, 28060

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

SSS

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner| =
2 3

vs. 5 32

SUAILEY K. YRIRDK, OR.» Respondent. 25=
as

aj 2

(ope 900-202-6548, 01-239-6983)

ORDER OF DISBARMENT
(By: Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the Disciplinary Board’s Report
and Reconmendation for the Disbarment of Stanley K. Yamada, Jr.
and Respondent Yanada’s lack of objection thereto as exhibited by
his failure to file an answer to the Petition as permitted by
Rule 2.7(c) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of
Hawai'i (RSCH) of to request briefing as permitted by RSCH

2.7(d), it appears that Respondent Yamada violated Rules 1.1,
2.3, 1,5(e), L1S(d), 3.2, 3.400), Te1(ad, 8.2(a), 8.2(b),
8.3(d) (2), 8.4(a), 8.4(c), and 8.4(d) of the Hawai'i Rules of
Professional Conduct, It further appears that Respondent Yamada
has departed from the State of Hawai'i, and making discipline
effective thirty (30) days after entry of this order, see RSCH
2.16(c), would be pointless. See Office of Disciplinary Counse:
vs Detello, 61 Haw. 223, 225, 601 P.2d 1087, 1088 (1979).

‘Therefore,

oats
17 IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent Stanley K. Yanada,
Je. de disbarred from the practice of law in this jurisdiction,
eftective imnediately.

17 18 FURTHER ORDERED that, as conditions for
reinstatenent,

1. Respondent Yanada shall pay restitution as
follows:

a. to Richard Vicari and Deborah Vicari ~ $15,000.00.

b. to Epitacic Garcia - $8,769.22.

2. Respondent Yamada shall pay any costs of these
proceedings a8 approved upon tinely submission of @ bill of
costs, end shall comply with the requirements of ASCH 2.16.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, Novenber 30, 2006.

¢ -
Sheehan
Sect Oey rem

Bao

Come. Dallgs br +