Title: Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Muhlbach

State: ohio

Issuer: Ohio Supreme Court

Document:

[Cite as Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Muhlbach, 91 Ohio St.3d 1248, 2001-Ohio-
74.] 
 
 
 
CUYAHOGA COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. MUHLBACH. 
[Cite as Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Muhlbach (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 1248.] 
(No. 99-808 — Submitted and decided March 27, 2001.) 
ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. 
__________________ 
 
This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing on September 
19, 2000, of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Peter Michael 
Muhlbach, Attorney Registration No. 0058412, last known address in Parma, 
Ohio, and upon his filing on March 5, 2001, of a notice of compliance. 
 
The court coming now to consider its order of September 8, 1999, wherein 
the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period 
of one year, and its order of February 15, 2001, finds that respondent has 
substantially complied with these orders and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. 
V(10)(A).  Therefore, 
 
IT IS ORDERED by this court that Peter Michael Muhlbach be, and 
hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. 
 
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified 
copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be 
made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the 
costs of publication. 
 
For earlier cases, see Medina Cty. Bar Assn. v. Muhlbach (1998), 83 Ohio 
St.3d 224, 699 N.E.2d 459; and Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Muhlbach (1999), 86 
Ohio St.3d 547, 715 N.E.2d 1134. 
 
DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., 
concur. 
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 
 
2
 
MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, J., dissent and would permit respondent to 
reapply no earlier than September 15, 2001.