Title: Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Co., Pet. v. Ronald Gisler (Summary Disposition)

State: pennsylvania

Issuer: Pennsylvania Supreme Court

Document:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner v. RONALD GISLER, Respondent : : : : : : : : : : : : : No. 31 EAL 2001 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 5th day of September, 2002, the judgment of the Superior Court entered December 22, 2000, is hereby REVERSED based upon this Court’s decision in Burstein v. Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company, 2002 WL 1575094 (Pa. July 17, 2002), holding that the regularly used, non-owned car exclusion contained in petitioner’s automobile insurance policy comports with the underlying policies of the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law, 75 Pa.C.S. § 1701 et seq. Mr. Justice Saylor dissents, as he would remand to the Superior Court for reconsideration in light of Burstein.