Title: Disciplinary Counsel v. Rothermel

State: ohio

Issuer: Ohio Supreme Court

Document:

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Rothermel, 86 Ohio St.3d 1215, 1999-Ohio-243.] 
 
 
 
 
 
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL  v. ROTHERMEL. 
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Rothermel (1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 1215.] 
(No. DD 84-20 — Submitted and decided September 9, 1999.) 
ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. 
 
This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an 
application for reinstatement by respondent, Christian Dean Rothermel, Attorney 
Registration No. 0043140, last known business address in Trenton, Ohio. 
 
The court coming now to consider its order of December 31, 1984, wherein 
the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V, former Section 6(C), suspended respondent 
for a period of one year, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that 
order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A).  Therefore, 
 
IT IS ORDERED by this court that respondent, Christian Dean Rothermel, 
be, and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. 
 
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified 
copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be 
made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs 
of publication. 
 
For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Rothermel (1984), 15 Ohio 
St.3d 121, 15 OBR 272, 472 N.E.2d 1072. 
 
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and 
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.