Title: Fong v. Oh

State: hawaii

Issuer: Hawaii Supreme Court

Document:

LAW LIBRARY

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAT‘T

---000--~

 

CONNIE Y. FONG,
Respondent /Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appephee

SEMIN OH and MYUNG HUT OH,

Petitioners/Defendants/Counterclaimants/
Cross-Clainants~Appellants

00:2 Hd 61 930 L002
aad

 

and
CELIA OLAES BATLE, Defendant/Cross-Claim Defendant
and

CLIFF ENTERPRISES, INC.; DAVID JON TAMURA; ANNE JU TAMURA; RENATO
VITO BATLE; MICHAEL TAMURA; and DOES 1-100, Defendants

and

SEMIN OH and MYUNG HUI O#,
Petitioners/Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants

KEITH M. KIUCHI,
Respondent /Third-Party Defendant-Appellee

 

 

No. 27635

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
(CIV. NO, 02-1-2007)

DECEMBER 19, 2007
for the court!)

 

(ay: Duffy,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the opinion of the court
filed on Novenber 30, 2007 is hereby corrected as follows
(deletions are in brackets and additions are double underscored) :
Page 2, footnote 1 (delete comma): The Honorable
Gary W.8. Chang{,] presided over this matter.
Page 3, footnotes: footnote numbered [1] is corrected
to read footnote nunber 2 and all subsequent footnotes shall be

renumbered accordingly.

 

Page 4, footnote 3, line 1: HRS § 245-3 (2001)
provides that every wholesaler or dealer of cigarettes

Page 18, paragraph 2, line 4: meaning of . . . HRS
$ (481) 495-1 (12). 52 Haw. at 643, 485 P.2d at

Page 19, line $: (emphasis added) {capitalization
altered), this court concluded that the contracts in

Page 21, line 6: instrument is both labeled “stock”
and “possessjes] ‘sone of the

Page 22, line 17 (add underscore): fits within [any]
any of the examples listed in the statutory

Page 26, line 5: economic conditions in Hawai"i and

the {long-reign] Jong reign of the Hawaii

} considered by: Noon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, Accba, and Duffy, 33.

2
Page 28, line 11: Security Act, see supra note [12]
12, and (2) the conedial purposes of
Page 28, line 14: Securities Act,” noted supra at note

(15) 1g), there are convincing

 

Page 29, heading numbered 3, line 3: “security” under
HRS § [425] 495-1(12)?

The Clerk of the Court is directed to incorporate the
foregoing changes in the original opinion and take all necessary

steps to notify the publishing agencies of these changes.

FOR THE COURT:

Goren &. Daly

Associate Justice