Title: Robert L. v. Sup. Ct.

State: california

Issuer: California Supreme Court

Document:

Filed 8/20/03 (reposted same date with clerical cite correction) 
 
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ROBERT L., 
) 
 
 
) 
 
Petitioner, 
) 
 
 
) 
S100359 
 
v. 
) 
 
 
) 
Ct.App. 4/3 G027381 
THE SUPERIOR COURT OF 
) 
ORANGE COUNTY, 
) 
 
 
) 
Orange County 
 
Respondent; 
) 
Super. Ct. No. J-1764-765 
 
 
) 
THE PEOPLE, 
) 
 
 
) 
 
Real Party in Interest. 
) 
___________________________________ ) 
 
 
 
THE COURT -- 
 
The opinion herein, appearing at 30 Cal.4th 894, is modified as follows: 
 
The following text is added to the first paragraph on page 903 after the 
second sentence:  “Proposition 21 repealed former section 186.22, subdivision (d), 
and reenacted the former subdivision’s language as current subdivision (g).  (See 
Ballot Pamp., Primary Elec. (Mar. 2000) text of Prop. 21, at pp. 119-120.)”  The 
immediately following sentence of the same paragraph—“Section 186.22, 
subdivision (g), which was also enacted as part of Proposition 21, provides:  
‘Notwithstanding any other law, the court may strike the additional punishment for 
the enhancements provided in this section or refuse to impose the minimum jail 
sentence for misdemeanors in an unusual case where the interests of justice would 
best be served if the court specifies on the record and enters into the minutes the 
circumstances indicating that the interests of justice would best be served by that 
disposition.’ ”—is modified to read as follows:  “Section 186.22, subdivision (g), 
provides:  ‘Notwithstanding any other law, the court may strike the additional 
punishment for the enhancements provided in this section or refuse to impose the 
minimum jail sentence for misdemeanors in an unusual case where the interests of 
justice would best be served if the court specifies on the record and enters into the 
minutes the circumstances indicating that the interests of justice would best be 
served by that disposition.’ ” 
 
This modification does not affect the judgment.