Title: Cooper v. Morikawa

State: hawaii

Issuer: Hawaii Supreme Court

Document:

SCPW-23-0000558 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI ________________________________________________________________ SAMUEL COOPER, JR., Petitioner, vs. THE HONORABLE TRISH K. MORIKAWA, Judge of the Circuit Court of the First Circuit, State of Hawaiʻi, Respondent Judge, and STATE OF HAWAIʻI, Respondent. ________________________________________________________________ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (S.P.P. No. 1CPN-22-0000028; CASE NO. 1PC990001708) ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, and Eddins, JJ., Circuit Judge Kim and Circuit Judge Watanabe, assigned by reason of vacancies) Upon consideration of the letter filed on September 29, 2023, which we construe as a petition for writ of mandamus, and the record, the circuit court denied Petitioner’s Hawaiʻi Rules of Penal Procedure (HRPP) Rule 40 petition for post-conviction Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-23-0000558 23-OCT-2023 12:47 PM Dkt. 7 ODDP 2 relief by order filed on October 3, 2023. Petitioner has not demonstrated a clear and indisputable right to relief, nor a lack of alternative means to seek relief. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawaiʻi 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999). We also reject Petitioner’s assertion that the deputy prosecuting attorney that filed a response to the HRPP Rule 40 petition should be sanctioned or otherwise disciplined. Respondent State of Hawaiʻi is allowed to file a response that objects to the arguments made in a HRPP Rule 40 petition. See HRPP Rule 40(d) (“Within 30 days after service of the petition or within such further time as the court may allow, the respondent may answer or otherwise plead, but the court may require the State to answer at any time.”). It is ordered that the petition is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, October 23, 2023. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Todd W. Eddins /s/ Robert D.S. Kim /s/ Kathleen N.A. Watanabe