Title: Anthony B. Boykins v. State of Florida

State: florida

Issuer: Florida Supreme Court

Document:

Supreme 
Court 
of 
Florida
 
____________
No. SC01-1123
____________
ANTHONY B. BOYKINS,
Petitioner,
vs.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent.
[May 16, 2002]
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted review of the decision in Boykins v. State, 783 So. 2d
317 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001), based on alleged express and direct conflict with a
decision of another district court of appeal.  Upon further consideration, we find that
jurisdiction was improvidently granted.  Accordingly, this review proceeding is
dismissed.
It is so ordered.
WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.
PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., dissent.
-2-
NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED.
Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal - 
Direct Conflict
Fifth District - Case No. 5D00-1768 
(Seminole County)
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Linda L. Gaustad, Assistant Public Defender,
Seventh Judicial Circuit, Daytona Beach, Florida,
for Petitioner
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Kellie A. Nielan and Pamela J. Koller,
Assistant Attorneys General, Daytona Beach, Florida,
for Respondent