Title: State v. Huffman

State: ohio

Issuer: Ohio Supreme Court

Document:

[Cite as State v. Huffman, 114 Ohio St.3d 433, 2007-Ohio-4553.] 
1 
 
 
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. HUFFMAN, APPELLANT. 
[Cite as State v. Huffman, 114 Ohio St.3d 433, 2007-Ohio-4553.] 
Child pornography – Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on the authority of 
State v. Tooley. 
(No. 2006-0799 — Submitted August 14, 2007 — Decided September 19, 2007.) 
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County,  
No. C-050044, 165 Ohio App.3d 518, 2006-Ohio-1106. 
__________________ 
{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed with respect to the 
issues presented in Proposition of Law Nos. I and II on the authority of State v. 
Tooley, 114 Ohio St.3d 366, 2007-Ohio-3698, ___ N.E.2d ___. 
{¶ 2} As to Proposition of Law No. III, the cause is dismissed, sua 
sponte, as having been improvidently accepted. 
 
MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL, 
LANZINGER and CUPP, JJ., concur. 
__________________ 
 
Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and James 
Michael Keeling, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. 
 
 
Ravert J. Clark, for appellant. 
______________________