Title: LeBeau v. Perry Videx, L.L.C.

State: ohio

Issuer: Ohio Supreme Court

Document:

[Cited as LeBeau v. Perry Videx, L.L.C., 117 Ohio St.3d 538, 2008-Ohio-1737.] 
1 
 
 
LEBEAU v. PERRY VIDEX, L.L.C., ET AL. 
[Cited as LeBeau v. Perry Videx, L.L.C., 117 Ohio St.3d 538, 2008-Ohio-1737.] 
Constitutionality of R.C. 2305.10(C) – Certified questions of state law answered 
on the authority of Groch v. Gen. Motors Corp. 
(No. 2007-0414 — Submitted March 12, 2008 — Decided April 16, 2008.) 
ON ORDER from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, 
Eastern Division, Certifying Questions of State Law, No. 5:06-CV-502. 
__________________ 
{¶1} 
The first certified question is answered in the negative on the 
authority of Groch v. Gen. Motors Corp., 117 Ohio St.3d 192, 2008-Ohio-546, 
883 N.E.2d 377.  In view of that answer, it is unnecessary for the court to answer 
the remaining questions. 
 
MOYER, 
C.J., 
and 
PFEIFER, 
LUNDBERG 
STRATTON, 
O’CONNOR, 
O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur. 
__________________ 
 
Bashein & Bashein  Co., L.P.A., and W. Craig Bashein; and Paul W. 
Flowers Co. L.P.A., and Paul W. Flowers, for respondent Arnold LeBeau. 
 
Ulmer & Berne, L.L.P., C. Reynolds Keller, Melissa L. Zujkowski, and 
Elizabeth M. Hill, for petitioners Perry Videx, L.L.C., and Perry Equipment 
Corporation. 
______________________