Title: King v. State

State: south-carolina

Issuer: South Carolina Supreme Court

Document:

308 S.C. 348 (1992) 417 S.E.2d 868 Jimmie S. KING, Petitioner-Respondent v. STATE of South Carolina, Respondent-Petitioner. Supreme Court of South Carolina. May 20, 1992. This matter is before the Court on two petitions for writs of certiorari following the granting of petitioner-respondent's application for postconviction relief (PCR). The order of Judge Bristow found that petitioner-respondent did not knowingly and intelligently waive his right to appellate review of an order of Judge Mobley denying his prior PCR application. Austin v. State, ___ S.C. ___, 409 S.E. (2d) 395 (1991). We grant the petition for a writ of certiorari from Judge Bristow's order, dispense with further briefing, and proceed to review the order of Judge Mobley. After careful consideration of the entire record as required by Johnson v. State, 294 S.C. 310, 364 S.E. (2d) 201 (1988), we deny the petition for a writ of certiorari filed by petitioner-respondent from the order of Judge Mobley and grant counsel's request to withdraw. The petition for a writ of certiorari filed by respondent-petitioner is granted. We despense with further briefing and order that the following procedure shall be used in all future cases where review is sought pursuant to Austin v. State, supra: It is so ordered.