Title: State v. Szklarski

State: north-dakota

Issuer: North Dakota Supreme Court

Document:

Filed Nov. 9, 2010 IN THE SUPREME COURTSTATE OF NORTH DAKOTA2010 ND 205 State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appelleev. Daniel Raymond Szklarski, Defendant and Appellant No. 20100087 Appeal from the District Court of Walsh County, Northeast Judicial District, the Honorable Richard M Geiger, Judge.AFFIRMED.Per Curiam.Barbara L. Whelan, State's Attorney, Walsh County Courthouse, 600 Cooper Ave., 3rd Floor, Grafton, N.D. 58237, for plaintiff and appellee.Darla J. Schuman, Schuman Law Office, 3001-A 32nd Ave. S., Grand Forks, N.D. 58201, for defendant and appellant. State v. SzklarskiNo. 20100087 Per Curiam. [1] Daniel Szklarski appeals from the trial court's judgment and order revoking his probation. On appeal, Szklarski argues the trial court erred in allowing him to represent himself at the probation revocation hearing because he did not knowingly and intelligently waive his right to counsel. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). [2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.Mary Muehlen MaringDaniel J. CrothersDale V. SandstromCarol Ronning Kapsner