Title: Scalia v. Romirowsky, PhD.

State: delaware

Issuer: Delaware Supreme Court

Document:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
JOSEPH SCALIA, 
 
 
 
§ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
§  No. 15, 2010 
 
Plaintiff, 
 
 
 
§ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
§  Court Below – Superior Court 
 
v. 
 
 
 
 
§  of the State of Delaware 
 
 
 
 
 
 
§  in and for New Castle County 
SAMUEL ROMIROWSKY, PhD., 
§  C.A. No. 09C-03-230 
 
 
 
 
 
 
§ 
 
Defendant.  
 
 
§ 
 
 
 
 
 
   Submitted:  September 1, 2010 
 
 
 
 
      Decided:  September 2, 2010 
 
Before STEELE, Chief Justice, HOLLAND and JACOBS, Justices. 
 
O R D E R 
 
This 2nd of September 2010, the Court having considered this matter 
after oral argument, has determined that it is manifest on the face that the 
appeal is without merit because:  to the extent the issues raised on appeal are 
factual, the record evidence supports the trial judge’s factual findings; to the 
extent the errors alleged on appeal are attributed to an abuse of discretion, 
the record does not support those assertions; and to the extent that the issues 
raised on appeal are legal, they are controlled by settled Delaware law, 
which was properly applied.  Therefore, this Court has concluded that the 
final judgment of the Superior Court should be affirmed on the basis of and 
for the reasons assigned by the Superior Court in its bench rulings dated  
July 29, 2009 and December 9, 2009.  
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment 
of the Superior Court be, and the same hereby is, AFFIRMED. 
 
 
 
 
 
BY THE COURT: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Randy J. Holland 
 
 
 
 
 
Justice