Title: Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Waldeck

State: maryland

Issuer: Maryland Supreme Court

Document:

O R D E R 
 
In its petition for disciplinary or remedial action, the Attorney Grievance 
Commission alleges that respondent was disbarred by the Court of Appeals of the 
District of Columbia for violation of Rules 1.3(a), 1.3(b)(1), 1.3(b)(2), 1.3(c), 1.4(a), 
1.15(a), 1.15(b), 1.15(e), 1.16(d), 8.4(c), and 8.4(d) of the District of Columbia Rules 
of Professional Conduct. Upon the filing of the petition and pursuant to Rule 19-
737(c), the Court issued an order requiring the parties to show cause why 
corresponding discipline should not be imposed. Bar Counsel responded to the order 
to show cause and recommends that respondent be disbarred. Respondent did not 
respond to the order. 
Upon consideration of the petition, it is this 25th day of July 2024, by the 
Supreme Court of Maryland,  
ORDERED that the Respondent, Robert P. Waldeck, is disbarred from the 
practice of law in the State of Maryland effective immediately; and it is further 
ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Robert P. 
Waldeck from the register of attorneys in this Court and certify that fact to the Trustees 
of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial 
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE 
COMMISSION OF MARYLAND 
 
 
 
 
v. 
 
ROBERT P. WALDECK 
* 
 
* 
 
* 
 
* 
 
* 
 
* 
     IN THE 
 
     SUPREME COURT 
 
     OF MARYLAND 
 
     AG Docket No. 49 
 
     September Term, 2023     
2 
 
tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-761(b). 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Matthew J. Fader 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   Chief Justice 
Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal 
Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State 
Government Article) this document is authentic. 
 
Gregory Hilton, Clerk 
2024.07.25 
08:35:02 -04'00'