Title: Booker v. Jones

State: florida

Issuer: Florida Supreme Court

Document:

Supreme Court of Florida 
 
 
____________ 
 
No. SC17-1205 
____________ 
 
STEPHEN TODD BOOKER,  
Petitioner, 
 
vs. 
 
JULIE L. JONES, etc.,  
Respondent. 
 
[January 30, 2018] 
 
 
 
PER CURIAM. 
Stephen Todd Booker petitions this Court for a writ of habeas corpus 
seeking relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Hurst v. 
Florida, 136 S. Ct. 616 (2016), and our decision on remand in Hurst v. State 
(Hurst), 202 So. 3d 40 (Fla. 2016), cert. denied, 137 S. Ct. 2161 (2017).  This 
Court has jurisdiction.  See art. V, § 3(b)(9), Fla. Const. 
This Court stayed Booker’s case pending the disposition of Hitchcock v. 
State, 226 So. 3d 216 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied, 138 S. Ct. 513 (2017).  After this 
 
 
- 2 - 
Court decided Hitchcock, Booker responded to this Court’s order to show cause 
arguing why Hitchcock should not be dispositive in this case. 
After reviewing Booker’s response to the order to show cause, as well as the 
State’s arguments in reply, we conclude that Booker is not entitled to relief.  
Booker was sentenced to death following a jury’s recommendation for death by a 
vote of eight to four.  Booker v. State, 773 So. 2d 1079, 1086 (Fla. 2001).  
Booker’s sentence of death became final in 2001.  Booker v. Florida, 532 U.S. 
1033 (2001).  Thus, Hurst does not apply retroactively to Booker’s sentence.  See 
Hitchcock, 226 So. 3d at 217.  Accordingly, we deny Booker’s petition. 
The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Booker, we 
caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken.  It is so 
ordered. 
LABARGA, C.J., and QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur. 
PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion. 
LEWIS and CANADY, JJ., concur in result. 
PARIENTE, J., concurring in result. 
I concur in result because I recognize that this Court’s opinion in Hitchcock 
v. State, 226 So. 3d 216 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied, 138 S. Ct. 513 (2017), is now 
final.  However, I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting 
opinion in Hitchcock. 
Original Proceeding – Habeas Corpus, Alachua County, 
Case No. 011977CF002332AXXXXX 
 
 
- 3 - 
 
Ann Finnell of Finnell, McGuinness, Nezami & Andux, P.A., Jacksonville, 
Florida; and Billy H. Nolas, Chief, Capital Habeas Unit, Office of the Federal 
Public Defender, Northern District of Florida, Tallahassee, Florida, 
 
for Petitioner 
 
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Lisa A. Hopkins, Assistant Attorney 
General, Tallahassee, Florida, 
 
for Respondent