Title: Eline v. Department of Public Safety, State of Hawaii

State: hawaii

Issuer: Hawaii Supreme Court

Document:

ay

 

No, 29883

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF RAWAT’: &

RICHARD ELINE, Petitioner,

> a

 

  

“920K L

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, STATE OF HAWAI'I, Res;

neni OOOO
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER
Moon, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and Recktenwald, JJ.)

 

Upon consideration of the petition for a writ of
mandamus filed by petitioner Richard Eline, it appears that
petitioner fails to demonstrate a clear and indisputable right to
relief and therefore, petitioner is not entitled to mandamus
relief, See Kema v, Gaddis, 91 Hawai'i 200, 204, 982 P.24 334,
338 (1999) (A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that
will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and
indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to
redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested
action.). Accordingly,

I 18 HEREBY ORDERED that the clerk of the appellate
court shall process the petition for a writ of mandamus without
payment of the filing fee.

IT 1S FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for a writ of
mandamus is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, July 7, 2009.

ren

Seca 6 etyare

(PN

Comm €.1Detye fe
TNE. Mehiteut/

UBRARY

aa