Title: Ladson v. State

State: south-carolina

Issuer: South Carolina Supreme Court

Document:

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR. THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Raymond J. Ladson, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI Appeal From Charleston County Roger M. Young, Post-Conviction Relief Judge Daniel F. Pieper, Trial Judge Memorandum Opinion No. 2007-MO-010 Submitted January 18, 2007 Filed February 12, 2007 AFFIRMED Jennifer Ann Jordan and Robert William Whelan, both of Charleston, for Petitioner. Attorney General Henry D. McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Colleen E. Dixon, all of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authority: Cherry v. State, 300 S.C. 115, 386 S.E.2d 624 (1989) (this Court must uphold the PCR judge's order if it is supported by any evidence of probative value in the record). TOAL, C.J., MOORE, WALLER, BURNETT and PLEICONES, JJ., concur.