Task: Toxic Language Detection
Input (English): Comment: Truly amusing seeing yet another G&M smear piece.  The paper published what - 100, 200, 300 - hit pieces on Trump, with nary a story on Hillary's pay to play, Benghazi, email server etc.  G&M was 100% wrong on the election.  Imagine that.  100% wrong.  Their job is to inform people, yet they were 100% wrong.  And Breitbart:  was it also 100% wrong?  They nailed the election.  So, when we talk about who was misleading the public, and who was factual, it was the far-left G&M editorial writers who were both wrong and intentionally misleading, and Breitbart that was correct and honest.  

Like the left wing American media, the G&M should hang its head in shame and offer an apology to its (few remaining) readers.
Output (English): Non-obscene