Task: Toxic Language Detection
Input (English): Comment: No Ms. K, she wasn't showing support for the pro life movement, because Sister Colleen Gibson wasn't allowed to participate in the Women's march with a pro life sign.

She literally wasn't allowed to show support for the pro life cause.

She wasn't allowed to by the march organizers. So her participation in the march was an endorsement of the idea that the pro life movement should be silenced, and that women who are pro life do not count and should not be seen or heard from, because their message contradicts the message of the organizers on abortion.

So whatever the sister had to say about believing "all people should be free" and all the other progressive boilerplate in her essay, she doesn't seem to get that her participation in the march was an endorsement of non-freedom, of censorship, and a denial of the freedom of speech for women who are pro life.
Output (English): Non-sexual-explicit