Task: Toxic Language Detection
Input (English): Comment: "All" is not completely honest. "All so far" would be. But since the SCOTUS has agreed to hear the case, how a potential 5-4 vote might go is unknown. 
-
Besides, the issue is simple: He didn't refuse to serve a customer because the customer was gay, a neo-Nazi, Hillary Clinton, or a police officer (as some personnel at some restaurants have done). 
-
He simply refused to use his artistic talents to create a piece of "edible art work" that was offensive to him. In this case it was a "gay wedding cake" but even Hypocritical Liberals would admit he would be right to refuse to decorate a "black man being lynched" for a racist or a swastika cake foe a neo-Nazi......because the issue is not the "customer" but the issue is the "art work" being created.  
-
So the hypocrites are the liberals....who will gladly defend his right to decline to decorate cakes they find offensive, but will curse him for declining to decorate cakes they don't.
Output (English): Non-sexual-explicit