Task: Question Generation
Input (English): Proper fluoroscopic education and protocols may reduce the patient radiation dose but few prospective studies in urology have been performed. Using optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters we tested whether fluoroscopy time and/or entrance skin dose would decrease after educational and radiation reduction protocols.', 'At default manufacturer settings fluoroscopy time and entrance skin dose were prospectively measured using optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters in patients undergoing ureteroscopy, retrograde pyelogram/stent or percutaneous nephrolithotomy with access for stone disease. A\xa0validated radiation safety competency test was administered to urology faculty and residents before and after web based, hands-on fluoroscopy training. Default\xa0fluoroscopy settings were changed from continuous to intermittent pulse\xa0rate and from standard to half-dose output. Fluoroscopy time and entrance skin dose were then measured again.', 'The cohorts of 44 pre-protocol and 50 post-protocol patients with stones were similarly matched. The change in mean fluoroscopy time and entrance skin dose from pre-protocol to post-protocol was -0.6 minutes and -11.6 mGy (33%) for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (p = 0.62 and <0.001), 0.5 minutes and -0.1\xa0mGy (34%) for ureteroscopy (p = 0.42 and 0.31), and 0.1 minute and -0.1 mGy (29%) for retrograde pyelogram/stent (p = 0.85 and 0.49, respectively). Urologist post-training test scores increased 30% from pretraining scores (p\xa0=\xa00.1).
Output (English): Does changing Default Fluoroscopy Equipment Settings decrease Entrance Skin Dose in Patients?