Task: Toxic Language Detection
Input (English): Comment: I am sorry, but this article by an uninformed author is another in the narrative  demanding that sexual assault investigations be slanted so all women are instantly granted 'victim' status, and that the subject of the complaint,  usually men are 'suspects', regardless of the credibility of the complaint. 

Further, contrary to what the writer states, it is not the job of the police to 'investigate and charge.'   Rather, it is the job of the police to investigate and determine the exact circumstances, and if warranted, to recommend the charges to Crown Counsel.  (In BC this is the process.)

It is also necessary for the police to interview the complainant to establish a; the identity of the alleged perpetrator, b; where this took place, c; is there physical evidence at the scene or on the person of the complaint, d; witnesses, and e; most important of all, ensure  it was clearly non-consensual.

Unless these facts are determined, the courts will not convict anyone.  Nor should they.
Output (English): Non-toxic