Task: Text Completion
Input (English): of the use of the land [were] restricted to a small, select number” of individuals chosen by the foundation for “their own reasons,” the property was not being put to a “public use.” Id. ¶ 12. The same holds true here. Those who seek to benefit from the use of VSC’s property must file an application, and VSC exercises sole discretion in determining who qualifies. The fact that the application process is open “to the entire world” is of no moment. Certainly, the same can be said for the applicants in Vermont Wild Land. What is significant is the existence of VSC’s screening process and the restrictions it imposes on those who can benefit from the primary use of the property. This is the hallmark of a “private” as opposed to a “public” use. See Sigler, 174 Vt. at 134, 807 A.2d at 447 (<HOLDING>). VSC’s beneficiaries share a proficiency in 
 Holding statements: (A) recognizing that a limited liability company has the citizenship of its membership (B) holding that the doctrine of equitable estoppel does not apply fully against the government because the possibility of harm to a private party is often if not always grossly outweighed by the public interest in enforcement of congressionally mandated public policy (C) recognizing that public utilities affect the public interest in that they render essential public services to a large number of the general public (D) recognizing that leased property is exempt from taxation where the lessee uses it for a public purpose (E) recognizing that unlike public uses private uses of property are characterized by the benefits bestowed on a particular and most often limited sector of the public usually distinguishable by certain characteristics or membership
Output (English): (E)