Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): the alleged negligence of an independent contractor. More specifically, GET argues that tour operators are not liable for the negligence of providers of transportation services. Corby, 1990 WL 488464 at 3. GET also cites numerous out-of-state cases which hold that tour operators are not liable for the negligence of third party suppliers of Grand European Inbound’s safety because GET made an inquiry into the reliability of GEI, and used it without incident for more that 10 years before Ramage’s alleged accident. B. Plaintiffs Opposition First, Ramage claims that waiver of defendant GET’s liability is contrary to public policy, and thus unenforceable and void. See Cal.Civ.Code § 1790.1. Ramage contends that he was not put on sufficient n Cal.App.3d 237, 240, 142 Cal.Rptr. 570 (1967) (<HOLDING>). Ramage contends GET expressly and impliedly 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that a summary judgment motion must stand or fall on the grounds expressly presented in the motion (B) holding that the courts denial of either a motion to dismiss or a motion for summary judgment is not a final judgment and is not reviewable  (C) holding that if there is any issue of fact which remains upon a motion for summary judgment the motion must be denied (D) holding that in ruling on a motion for summary judgment the trial court is limited to the grounds raised in the motion (E) holding the denial of a motion for summary judgment on an issue which is later submitted to the jury is not reviewable
Output (English): holding that a summary judgment motion must stand or fall on the grounds expressly presented in the motion