Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): a home was not raised below, it nevertheless decides the issue. Because I disagree with the majority’s disposition, I dissent from the conclusion that police are not required to have a reasonable and articulable suspicion of criminal activity in a home before seeking a consent search. Similar to the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, the New Jersey Constitution prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures. N.J. Const. art. I, ¶ 7. “A warr 866 (2005) (finding legitimate expectation of privacy in bank records under State Constitution in contrast to Federal Constitution); State v. Pierce, 136 N.J. 184, 215, 642 A.2d 947 (1994) (invalidating warrantless vehicular search based on arrest for motor vehicle offense); State v. Tucker, 136 N.J. 158, 166-70, 642 A.2d 401 (1994) (<HOLDING>); State v. Hempele, 120 N.J. 182, 195-215, 576 
 Holding statements: (A) holding new jersey constitution prohibits search of auto incident to arrest where occupant removed from vehicle and secured elsewhere (B) holding that in contrast with fourth amendment new jersey constitution prohibits police from stopping defendant solely because of flight upon seeing police (C) holding new jersey law prohibits appropriation of a celebritys nickname (D) recognizing israel had no interest in denying its citizens the substantive advantages of new jersey defamation law in new jersey residents claims for defamation published in new jersey (E) holding the fourth amendment prohibits the police from making a warrantless and nonconsensual entry into a suspects home in order to make a routine felony arrest
Output (English): recognizing israel had no interest in denying its citizens the substantive advantages of new jersey defamation law in new jersey residents claims for defamation published in new jersey