Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): rehearing he was found not guilty of such offense, as appears from the record or certificate of the court setting aside or reversing such conviction, or that he has been pardoned upon the stated ground of innocence and unjust conviction and (2) he did not commit any of the acts charged or his acts, deeds, or omissions in connection with such charge constituted no offense against the United States, or any State, Territory or the District of Columbia, and he did not by misconduct or neglect cause or bring about his own prosecution. 28 U.S.C. § 2513(a). The grant of jurisdiction to the Court of Federal Claims over a claim for compensation for an unjust conviction and imprisonment is strictly construed. Vincin v. United States, 199 Ct.Cl. 762, 468 F.2d 930, 933 (1972) (citations omitted) (<HOLDING>). The Court of Federal Claims does not have the 
 Holding statements: (A) holding dormancy statutes should be strictly construed (B) holding that in presence of any doubt a penal statute is to be strictly construed (C) holding that the unjust conviction statute has always been strictly construed (D) holding that a statute enacted in derogation of the common law must be strictly construed   (E) holding that railroad immunity act should be strictly construed
Output (English): holding dormancy statutes should be strictly construed