Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): keep their promise at the time it was made. 1. Fraud with Particularity Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 9(b), “all averments of fraud or mistake, the circumstances constituting fraud or mistake shall be stated with particularity.” This rule requires the plaintiff to allege such circumstances so the defendant can prepare an adequate answer from the allegations. Walling v. Beverly Enterprises, 476 F.2d 393, 397 (9th Cir.1973). The plaintiff should include the time, place and content of the alleged misrepresentations. Decker v. GlenFed, Inc., 42 F.3d 1541, 1548 (9th Cir.1994). A plaintiff should set forth reasons why the statements were false. Id. Additionally, the plaintiff should, where possible, identify who made the representations. See Wool v. Tandem Computers, Inc., 818 F.2d 1433 (9th Cir.1987) (<HOLDING>). Defendants argue that Plaintiffs’ allegations 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that a plaintiff has a duty to plead the date of discovery of fraud where the alleged fraud apparently occurred at a remote time (B) recognizing that rule 9b is largely designed to give each opponent notice of his purported role in the alleged fraud (C) holding that a plaintiff is required to identify specific acts of individual defendants  for his claim to survive (D) holding that plaintiff should identify when possible the role of individual defendants in the alleged fraud (E) holding that where a plaintiff is unaware of the identity of alleged defendants plaintiff should be given an opportunity through discovery to identify the unknown defendants unless it is clear that discovery would not uncover the identities or that the complaint would be dismissed on other grounds
Output (English): holding that a plaintiff has a duty to plead the date of discovery of fraud where the alleged fraud apparently occurred at a remote time