Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): at 298; see also 29 U.S.C. 216(b) (“[An employer violating Section 207] shall be liable ... in the amount of ... unpaid overtime compensation ....”) (emphasis added). But, in O’Brien, we specifically declined to reach the issue of the extent to which the town employer may offset contractual overtime payments against its FLSA overtime liability, remanding those determinations to the district court. O’Brien, 350 F.3d at 298. By contrast, Roman dealt with the second issue: whether, as part of the remedy, an offset to FLSA liability is permissible for paid time off. It squarely held that liability for unpaid wages under the FLSA may be offset by the paid time off (or a partial offset if the rate of pay is not at overtime rates). Roman, 147 F.3d at 77; see also D ’Camera, 722 F.Supp. at 803 (<HOLDING>). Nothing in O’Brien is to the contrary. 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that unemployment compensation should not be deducted from a back pay award under the national labor relations act because failing to deduct unemployment payments does not make the employee more than whole (B) holding that compensatory time used by plaintiff police officers can be deducted from award of back pay (C) holding that compensatory money damages are generally distinct from equitable forms of relief such as injunctions or back pay (D) holding that back pay may be awarded to the date of judgment (E) holding that an award of back pay is an issue for the court
Output (English): holding that an award of back pay is an issue for the court