Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): concluded that 11 U.S.C. § 106(c) does not permit an award of money damages against the IRS for violating the automatic stay of 11 U.S.C. § 362(a), the court examines 11 U.S.C. § 106(a) and (b) for authority to support the judgment of the bankruptcy court. Section 106(a) and (b) addresses to what extent the government is deemed to have waived its sovereign immunity in bankruptcy proceedings when it pursues a claim against a debtor. Subsection (a) “provides for ‘affirmative recovery/ including money judgments,” but only in limited circumstances. Hoffman v. Connecticut Dep’t of Income Maintenance (In re Willington Convalescent Home, Inc.), 850 F.2d 50, 54 (2d Cir.1988), aff'd, 492 U.S. 96, 109 S.Ct. 2818, 106 L.Ed.2d 76 (1989) (citations omitted); see also Inslaw, 113 B.R. at 812-13 (<HOLDING>). The waiver of sovereign immunity under this 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that the fourth amendment does not mandate the payment of money by the united states (B) holding that the doctrine of sovereign immunity barred a claim for money damages against the librarian of congress in his official capacity because immunity had not been waived and the exceptions to immunity did not apply (C) holding that the united states department of justice waived its immunity from money damages under subsection a (D) holding that exhaustion is required under the plra even if the plaintiff seeks only money damages and money damages are not available as relief (E) holding a claim for injunction but not money damages against a state officer for a violation of the age discrimination in employment act enacted under article i section 8 of the united states constitution was not barred by sovereign immunity under the ex parte young exception
Output (English): holding that the doctrine of sovereign immunity barred a claim for money damages against the librarian of congress in his official capacity because immunity had not been waived and the exceptions to immunity did not apply