Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): to § 362(c)(1). Collier, ¶ 362.06 at 362-72 (“Section 362(c) describes when the stay terminates in a bankruptcy ease. It provides that, unless relief is granted earlier by the court, a stay of an act against property of the estate expires when the property is no longer property of the estate, and other stays expire at the earlier of the time that (1) the case is closed, (2) the case is dismissed, or (3) the debtor receives a discharge.”). Pursuant to § 362(c)(2), the automatic stay was lifted upon the earlier of the closing of the case and the discharge. Since the automatic stay has already been terminated by operation of § 362(c), I am incapable of granting the Bank’s motion to modify the stay. See Dep’t of Air Force v. Carolina Parachute Corp., 907 F.2d 1469, 1474 (4th Cir.1990) (<HOLDING>). While I find that I am incapable of modifying 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that although the automatic stay only applies to proceedings against the debtor  counterclaims seeking affirmative relief against a debtor implicate the automatic stay (B) recognizing that after provisions of  362c have been met there can be no further application of the automatic stay (C) holding judgment in violation of automatic stay void (D) holding that the denial of a motion to find a violation of the automatic stay was a final order (E) holding that the automatic stay did not bar the filing of a proof of claim where the debtor actively litigated a separate action during the pending bankruptcy proceeding because to permit the automatic stay provision to be used as a trump card played after an unfavorable result was reached  would be inconsistent with the underlying purpose of the automatic stay
Output (English): holding that the denial of a motion to find a violation of the automatic stay was a final order