Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit, PER CURIAM: Tracey Lamont Coad pled guilty pursuant to a plea agreement to possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), 924(e) (2012), and was sentenced under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), to 212 months’ imprisonment. Coad appealed, and this Court affirmed the criminal judgment. The Supreme Court of the United States granted Coad’s petition for a writ of certiorari, vacated this Court’s judgment, and remanded for further consideration in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v. United States, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 2551, 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015) (<HOLDING>). Coad v. United States, — U.S. -, 136 S.Ct. 
 Holding statements: (A) holding residual clause of acca void for vagueness (B) holding that imposing an increased sentence under the residual clause of the acca violates the constitutions guarantee of due process (C) holding massachusetts conviction for larceny from the person constitutes violent felony under the residual clause of the acca (D) holding that va code  182603 is not void for vagueness (E) holding c4c factor void for vagueness unless limiting construction was given
Output (English): holding massachusetts conviction for larceny from the person constitutes violent felony under the residual clause of the acca