Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): the creation of the Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands. 48 U.S.C. § 1613a(d). 4 . "We review the denial of a suppression motion for clear error as to the underlying facts, and exercise[ ] plenary review as to the legality of the denial in the light of properly found facts.” United States v. Leveto, 540 F.3d 200, 211 n. 9 (3d Cir.2008). 5 . The taking of DNA samples following a lawful arrest constitutes a lawful search. Maryland v. King, - U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 1958, 1980, 186 L.Ed.2d 1 (2013). Accordingly, if the arrest was lawful, so too was the collection of Clarke's DNA. 6 . In the alternative, it would not have been plain error for the Superior Court to conclude the arresting officers were faced with an exigent circumstance justifying a warrantless arrest. See Myers, 308 F.3d at 265 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that a warrantless entry by police into an apartment based on an uncorroborated anonymous 911 report of a mentally ill man  acting crazy and possibly in possession of a gun violated the fourth amendment (B) holding that 911 call reporting domestic dispute and child telling officer that a man with a gun was inside fighting with her mom constituted exigent circumstances that justified warrantless entry into home (C) holding that exigent circumstances justified warrantless entry where it seemed apparent that a burglary was in progress (D) holding that exigent circumstances justified warrantless entry where officers were faced with a call reporting burglary in progress (E) holding that officers warrantless entry was justified to assure safety of person who called 911
Output (English): holding that exigent circumstances justified warrantless entry where officers were faced with a call reporting burglary in progress