Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): quotation marks omitted). “Rule 12(b)(6) should be employed only when the complaint does not present a legal claim.” Smith v. Cash Store Management, Inc., 195 F.3d 325, 327 (7th Cir.1999) (internal quotation marks omitted). Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint contains a single cause of action. It alleges that the UUW and AUUW statutes violate Plaintiffs’ Second Amendment right to carry firearms, concealed or otherwise, outside their homes. See Am. Compl. at 10. Because this Court has determined that individuals do not have a Second Amendment right to bear arms outside of the home, this Court finds that the UUW and the AUUW statutes — which only regulate firearm possession outside of the home— do not infringe on Plaintiffs’ Second Amendment rights. See Heller, 554 U.S. at 635, 128 S.Ct. 2783 (<HOLDING>). Therefore, Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint does 
 Holding statements: (A) holding second amendment right is incorporated against the states through fourteenth amendment (B) holding that it is a violation of the fourth amendment for police to bring members of the media or other third parties into a home during the execution of a warrant when the presence of third parties in the home was not in aid of the execution of the warrant (C) holding that the fourteenth amendment incorporated the sixth amendment right to counsel (D) holding that the second amendment fully applies to state and local regulation through the fourteenth amendment (E) holding only that the second amendment affords individuals a right to bear arms in the home and explaining that the second amendment elevates above all other interests the right of  citizens to use arms in defense of hearth and home
Output (English): holding that it is a violation of the fourth amendment for police to bring members of the media or other third parties into a home during the execution of a warrant when the presence of third parties in the home was not in aid of the execution of the warrant