Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): 18 to dictate that sentencing courts should not include the weight of the liquid solvent in liquid LSD when determining a defendant’s base offense level. Amendment 484 demonstrates the Commission’s intention that not all materials that are combined or “mixed” with controlled substances should be included in the weight of the drug for sentencing purposes. The liquid solvent thus may not be included in the definition in Amendment 484 of “mixture or substance” given that, although wholesale traffickers use the solvent to apply the drug to ingestible carrier media, consumers do not “use” the solvent because it evaporates from the carrier media before the media are ingested. See Chapman, 500 U.S. at 457, 111 S.Ct. at 1923. But cf. United States v. Lowden, 955 F.2d 128, 131 (1st Cir.1992) (<HOLDING>). For the foregoing reasons, we thus remand 
 Holding statements: (A) holding under plain error standard that basing sentence on lsd and water in which it was dissolved did not violate due process (B) holding that omission was not plain error (C) holding that any error was harmless and thus not plain error (D) holding that doctrine does not violate due process (E) holding that the courts review is conducted under the plain error standard
Output (English): holding that omission was not plain error