Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): types of proper and timely postdecision motions extend the time to appeal the order or judgment that is the subject of the motion. Minn. R. Civ. App. P. 104.01, subd. 2. Motions for amended findings and a new trial are included in the list of tolling motions. Id,, subd. 2(b), (d). Unless Minn. Stat. § 508.29 provides otherwise, appellants’ proper and timely motions for amended findings or a new trial extended the time to appeal the April 19, 2017 order granting respondent’s petition. No language in Minn. Stat. § 508.29 precludes the operation of Minn. R. Civ. App. P. 104.01, subd.' 2. On the contrary, Minn. Stat. § 508.29 specifies that the appeal shall be as in other civil cases. Cf. Hous. & Redevelopment Auth. v. Main St. Fridley Props., LLC, 755 N.W.2d 789, 791 (Minn. App. 2008) (<HOLDING>). Appellants’ proper and timely motions for 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that faa  16a3 did not preempt a state statute prohibiting appeal of an order to compel arbitration and reasoning that there is no reason to suppose that the timing of the exercise of the right of appeal from an order compelling arbitration is other than a procedural matter which does not alter the substantive rights of either party (B) holding that an order not denominated a judgment is not final for purposes of appeal (C) holding that minn r civ app p 10401 subd 2 does not apply to an appeal of an order approving the public use or public purpose necessity and authority for the taking under minn stat  117075 subd 1c 2006 because the statute specifies that the order becomes final unless the appeal is taken within the 60day appeal period and the statute does not indicate that the matter is to proceed as in other civil actions (D) holding that the point on appeal and the objection in the trial court must be the same in order for it to be preserved for appeal (E) holding that if an express appeal waiver does not preclude a challenge to the sentence as unlawful then the covenant not to appeal becomes meaningless
Output (English): holding that faa  16a3 did not preempt a state statute prohibiting appeal of an order to compel arbitration and reasoning that there is no reason to suppose that the timing of the exercise of the right of appeal from an order compelling arbitration is other than a procedural matter which does not alter the substantive rights of either party