Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): Id., 177 W.Va. at 322, 352 S.E.2d at 72. In Daily Gazette, we noted that “it seems evident that the legislature enacted these provisions with the ultimate purpose of improving the quality of medical care provided in the hospitals of this State.” Id., 177 W.Va. at 322, 352 S.E.2d at 71. See Mahmoodian v. United Hospital Center, Inc., 185 W.Va. 59, 65, 404 S.E.2d 750, 756 (1991), cert. denied — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 185, 116 L.Ed.2d 146 (1991), (noting that this Code section “evinces a public policy encouraging health care professionals to monitor the competency and professional conduct of their peers in order to safeguard and improve the quality of patient care”). In Daily Gazette, we also quoted from Jenkins v. Wu, 102 Ill.2d 468, 82 Ill.Dec. 382, 388, 468 N.E.2d 1162, 1168 (1984) (<HOLDING>) that “[T]he purpose of this legislation is not 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that a similar hawaii statute violates equal protection (B) holding transfer rule did not violate federal equal protection (C) holding that failing to comply with hospital bylaws in connection with peer review proceeding did not vitiate peer review immunity (D) holding a similar peer review confidentiality statute did not deny the plaintiffs equal protection (E) holding that state and federal equal protection guarantees provide similar protections
Output (English): holding that failing to comply with hospital bylaws in connection with peer review proceeding did not vitiate peer review immunity