Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): 824, 827 (4th Cir.2010) (on a.motion to dismiss, the facts as alleged irt the' complaint are assumed to be true). 3 . The Amended Complaint was filed on May 20, 2016, and alleges that plaintiff is a current employee of defendant. See Am Comp. ¶ 1. Yet, the employment agreement between the parties, to which the Amended Complaint refers, has a termination date of June 21, 2016. See D. Mot. Summ. J. (Doc. 17), Ex. 2-C, §■7.1. Thus, it appears, from the record that plaintiff’s employment relationship with defendant has terminated since the initiation of this lawsuit. 4 . There are twelve circuit court opinions citing § 7434, and no precedential opinion has dealt with the question presented in this case. See Cuellar-Aguilar v. Deggeller Attractions, Inc., 812 F.3d 614, 620-21 (8th Cir.2015) (<HOLDING>); Pitcher v. Waldmam, 591 Fed.Appx. 466, 467 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that a plaintiff can seek statutory damages even in the absence of actual damages (B) holding tcpa is remedial statute and that statutory damages are not punitive damages (C) holding that actual damages under respa included emotional damages (D) holding that a plaintiff could recover actual damages under the tcpa for loss of credit if the plaintiff submitted sufficient proof of the amount damages requested (E) holding that even emotional damages could constitute actual damages for purposes of  2605f1a
Output (English): holding that a plaintiff could recover actual damages under the tcpa for loss of credit if the plaintiff submitted sufficient proof of the amount damages requested