Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): their administrative inspection of the salvage yard, another stolen vehicle was being driven off the premises by the owner’s nephew. See id. There was one, and possibly two, suspicious motorcycle frames very near Johnson’s toolbox. See id. The toolbox was large enough to contain license plates and VIN plates. See id. Thus, the officers had at least a reasonable suspicion that the toolbox might contain something relevant to their administrative search and accordingly did not exceed what is permissible under the administrative-inspection statutes when they searched Johnson’s toolbox. See id. Furthermore, the Tenth Circuit stated that the fact that the toolbox was locked did not place it off limits from inspection. See id.; United States v. Biswell, 406 U.S. at 317, 92 S.Ct. 1593 (<HOLDING>). The Tenth Circuit did not directly address 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that officers executing warrantless search under the authority of an administrative inspection statute were entitled to demand that gun dealer unlock storeroom (B) holding that officers executing a search warrant for contraband have the authority to detain the occupants of the premises while a proper search is conducted (C) holding that officers may detain the occupants of a vehicle while executing a search warrant (D) holding that the discovery of evidence of crimes in the course of an otherwise proper administrative inspection does not render that search illegal or the administrative scheme suspect (E) holding that officers may detain the occupants of a house while executing a search warrant
Output (English): holding that officers may detain the occupants of a house while executing a search warrant