Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): Analysis ¶ 13 Oklahoma law reflects this State's strong public policy in favor of arbitration. See 12 O.S8. Supp.2006 § 1857(A); see also Towe, Hester & Erwin, Inc. v. Kansas City Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 1997 OK CIV APP 58, ¶ 24, 947 P.2d 594, 599. Section 1857(A) of the New Act declares arbitration agreements "valid, enforceable, and irrevocable except upon a ground that exists at law or in equity for the revocation of a contract." This provision reveals "a clear legislative intent that any disputes arising from the interpretation or application" of such agreements "shall have an immediate and speedy resolution by required arbitration." Voss v. City of Oklahoma City, 1980 OK 148, ¶ 8, 618 P.2d 925, 928; see Bruner v. Timberlane Manor Ltd. P'ship, 2006 OK 90, ¶ 23, 155 P.3d 16, 25 (<HOLDING>). "[Clourts generally look with favor upon 
 Holding statements: (A) recognizing a liberal federal policy favoring arbitration in the faa (B) recognizing  1857a is a clear expression of oklahomas policy favoring arbitration agreements (C) recognizing the supreme courts repeated reaffirmation of new mexicos strong public policy favoring resolution of disputes through arbitration (D) recognizing oklahomas policy of allowing regulation instead of competition in waste disposal services (E) recognizing oklahomas policy of allowing regulation instead of competition in electricity sales
Output (English): recognizing the supreme courts repeated reaffirmation of new mexicos strong public policy favoring resolution of disputes through arbitration