Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): with the independent evidence being offered against him. In essence, it is alleged that the convictions rested upon an unlawful cumulation of evidence, and that had there been separate trials, the appellants would not have been convicted. . . . [citations omitted] Weighing this possibility of prejudice ‘against the interests of economy and expedition in judicial administration’, we do not find an abuse of discretion in the denial of a severance . . . [citations omitted].” 406 F.2d at 933, 934, 935. The judgment and sentence appealed from are Affirmed. 1 . Counts 1 through 35 charged violations of the mail fraud statute, Title 18, U.S.C., Section 1341. Count 36 charged a conspiracy under Title 18, U.S.C., Section 812, cert. denied 1956, 351 U.S. 966, 76 S.Ct. 1025, 100 L.Ed. 1486 (<HOLDING>) ; Collins v. United States, 9 Cir. 1946, 157 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that delay is waived when the defendant fails to object when a continu ance is granted (B) holding that when a district court fails to provide reasons for imposing special conditions and the defendant fails to object we review for plain error (C) holding that an accused cannot sustain a speedytrial claim when delay results from his    making dilatory pleadings or motions failing to object when a continuance is granted the government    (D) holding that delay is waived when the defendant makes dilatory pleadings and motions (E) holding that an issue is waived when a party fails to provide adequate citation to authority
Output (English): holding that when a district court fails to provide reasons for imposing special conditions and the defendant fails to object we review for plain error