Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): than English, “also has in his or her immediate possession a valid international driving permit.” Appellant does not claim that he has a valid license from any state or country or that he was otherwise exempt from the licensing requirement when he was cited. 5 Although Appellant stipulated that he has been living in this state for over ten years, he is not a Georgia “resident” for purposes of the drivers’ licenses chapter of the Georgia Code. See OCGA §§ 40-1-1 (35) (“ ‘Nonresident’ means every person who is not a resident of this state.”), 40-5-1 (15) (“[N]o person shall he considered a resident for purposes of this chapter unless such person is either a United States citizen or an alien with legal authorization____”). See also Diaz v. State, 245 Ga.App. 380, 383 (537 SE2d 784) (2000) (<HOLDING>); John Doe No. 1 v. Ga. Dept. of Public Safety, 
 Holding statements: (A) holding act qualifies as exemption statute under exemption 3 (B) holding that the right to drive is not a fundamental right (C) holding that an illegal immigrants status as a nonresident does not create an exemption allowing him to drive without a valid georgia license (D) holding a debtors claim for loss of consortium to be entitled to an exemption under the oklahoma exemption statute and collecting other bankruptcy decisions recognizing a debtor spouses loss of consortium as the basis for allowing an exemption under federal and various state exemption statutes (E) holding that an slc members status as a defendant does not create a lack of independence
Output (English): holding act qualifies as exemption statute under exemption 3