Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): other than article 42.12, section 5 of the same code. Therein, the legislature stated that matters involving conviction and punishment had to be appealed immediately after the defendant was placed on probation. Tex.Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 42.12, § 23(b) (Vernon Supp.1999). Once probation is revoked, however, the complainant “may appeal the revocation.” Id. From this it follows that when the legislature said the accused “may appeal the revocation” it meant that he can only appeal matters relating to the revocation itself. See, e.g., Keith v. State, 916 S.W.2d 602, 608 (Tex.App.—Amarillo 1996, no pet.) (concluding that the time to appeal the conditions of one’s probation is at the time the complainant is granted probation); Standley v. State, 517 S.W.2d 538, 541 (Tex.Crim.App.1975) (<HOLDING>). And, whether one was granted an opportunity 
 Holding statements: (A) holding where party fails to challenge specificity of pleading it waives right to claim that pleading fails to meet legal requirements (B) holding right to be fundamental (C) holding that a defendant who fails to object to trial error forfeits his right to appellate review unless he can establish fundamental error (D) holding that plain error review applies when a party fails to raise a claim before the district court (E) holding that absent fundamental error one who fails to appeal when placed on probation waives his right to review
Output (English): holding that a defendant who fails to object to trial error forfeits his right to appellate review unless he can establish fundamental error