Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): 3604(c). B. Plaintiff Adequately Pleads a Section 3604(d) Violation Based on Defendant’s Statements Regarding Housing Availability Under Section 3604(d), it is illegal to represent to someone that housing is unavailable, when in fact it is available, because that person has a disability. (See 42 U.S.C. § 3604(d).) The section is intended to afford a legal right to all persons to have access to truthful housing information. See Vill. of Bellwood v. Dwivedi, 895 F.2d 1521, 1526 (7th Cir.1990) (“The statute creates a right to be free from ... misrepresentations”) (quoting Havens Realty Corp. v. Coleman, 455 U.S. 363, 373-374, 102 S.Ct. 1114, 71 L.Ed.2d 214 (1982)); see also Kyles v. J.K. Guardian Sec. Servs., Inc., 222 F.3d 289, 296-97 (7th Cir.2000) (citing Dwivedi, 895 F.2d at 1526) (<HOLDING>). In Havens, the Supreme Court held that an 
 Holding statements: (A) recognizing provisions of the fair housing act that forbid false statements that housing is unavailable to a person because of his race (B) holding inter alia that real estate brokers who treat customers differently from one another because of their race violate the fair housing act (C) holding that the state has no obligation to provide adequate housing (D) holding that the department of agricultures rural housing services alleged failure to implement the fair housing act was not discrete agency action for purposes of  7061 (E) holding that the brooke amendment to the housing act provided a cause of action under  1983
Output (English): holding that the brooke amendment to the housing act provided a cause of action under  1983