Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): parties to the charge indicating the finding. The Commission's letter of determination shall be the final determination of the Commission.” 2 . The Florida Omnibus Aids Act, Fla. Stat. § 760.50, prohibits employers from discharging an employee or otherwise discriminating against any employee on the basis of knowledge or a belief that the employee has HIV. 3 . The Florida Civil Rights Act, Fla. Stat. § 760.01 et seq., prohibits employers from discharging or otherwise discriminating against any employee with a "handicap” because of the employee’s "handicap.” 4 . We reject BT Foods’ position that Byrd failed to preserve this issue by later stipulating to admission of the entire EEOC file, including the determination letters. See Sheffield v. Superior Ins. Co., 800 So.2d 197 (Fla. 2001) (<HOLDING>). However, because the trial court's ruling was 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that once a trial court makes an unequivocal ruling admitting evidence over a movants motion in limine the movants subsequent introduction of that evidence does not constitute a waiver of the error for appellate review (B) holding grant or denial of motion in limine is preliminary ruling and normally preserves nothing for appellate review (C) holding that a party failed to preserve error by not pursuing a ruling at trial where the courts motion in limine ruling invited the party to attempt to admit the evidence during trial (D) holding that for error to be preserved on appeal with regard to admission of evidence in violation of a ruling on a motion in limine that the evidence is inadmissible an objection should be made at the time the evidence is offered (E) holding that a definitive ruling in limine preserves an issue for appellate review without the need for later objection
Output (English): holding that a definitive ruling in limine preserves an issue for appellate review without the need for later objection