Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): order remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed is not reviewable on appeal or otherwise, except that an order remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed pursuant to section 1443 [civil rights cases] of this title shall be reviewable by appeal or otherwise. 6 . Compare In re Allied-Signal, Inc., 919 F.2d 277 (5th Cir.1990) (granting writ of mandamus after noting that the trial court did not state that jurisdiction was lacking but affirmatively reflected that remand was based solely on a state statute) with In re Weaver, 610 F.2d 335, 337 (5th Cir.1980) (denying writ of mandamus despite the absence of specific § 1447(c) words, when the district court based remand upon its belief that jurisdiction was lacking). See also Merrimack, 587 F.2d at 647-48 (<HOLDING>). 7 . The Eleventh Amendment states that: "The 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that a proper eleventh amendment challenge strips the courts of jurisdiction for the purposes of the removal statute 28 usc  1447c (B) holding that under 28 usc  1447c and d federal jurisdiction terminates once a section 1447c remand order has been mailed to the state court (C) holding that we have jurisdiction to review the award or denial of attorney fees under  1447c (D) holding that the district courts order while not referring to  1447c by number stated one of its grounds no jurisdiction thereby precluding review by mandamus (E) recognizing the supreme courts longstanding jurisdiction over writs of prohibition and mandamus to courts of inferior jurisdiction
Output (English): holding that a proper eleventh amendment challenge strips the courts of jurisdiction for the purposes of the removal statute 28 usc  1447c