Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): to quantify his expenditures while the children are with him and his future expenditures for the children’s college expenses is speculative and not persuasive. The guidelines “assume that the care given to the child during temporary periods when the child resides with the obligor ... do not substitute for the child support obligation.” N.D.A.C. § 75-02-04.1-02(2). Moreover, the parties’ stipulation requires both Sheldon and Carla to pay half of the children’s reasonable tuition and room and board for up to four years of college. It also requires Sheldon to pay a reasonable share of the children’s expenses incurred by Carla while the children attend college. The stipulation recognizes a shared obligation by Carla and Sheldon for the children’s college expenses. See N.D.C.C. § 14-09-08 (<HOLDING>). We agree with the trial court that the 
 Holding statements: (A) recognizing that under the act states are granted federal funds to provide disabled children with a free appropriate public education in the least restrictive environment (B) recognizing mutual duty of each parent to provide children with support and education suitable to the childrens circumstances (C) recognizing duty of parent to control conduct of child (D) holding that evidence of the fathers conduct in stabbing the childrens mother alleged to endanger the childrens physical and emotional wellbeing is pertinent to and entwined in the issue of the childrens best interest (E) recognizing the right of the parent to give his children education suitable to their station in life
Output (English): recognizing that under the act states are granted federal funds to provide disabled children with a free appropriate public education in the least restrictive environment