Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): pumping cases and the body cavity search cases have generally involved searches of prison inmates and searches at the United States border. See id. at 124. In both contexts, the suspect’s expectation of privacy is thought to be less reasonable and the government’s interest thought to be greater. See id. at 125, 144-61 (and cases cited therein); see also United States v. Montoya de Hernandez, 473 U.S. 531, 537-40, 105 S.Ct. 3304, 87 L.Ed.2d 381, 388-90 (1985) (“[N]ot only is the expectation of privacy less at the border ... the Fourth Amendment balance between the interest of the Government and the privacy right of the individual is also struck much more favorably to the Government at the border.”); Hudson v. Palmer, 468 U.S. 517, 525-26, 104 S.Ct. 3194, 82 L.Ed.2d 393, 402-03 (1984) (<HOLDING>). In light of these authorities, Lewis contends 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that prisoners have no legitimate expectation of privacy and that the fourth amendments prohibition on unreasonable searches does not apply in prison cells (B) holding that prisoners do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their cells (C) holding that individuals have no expectation of privacy in their license registration or insurance documents and citing outofstate cases that have held that individuals do not have a privacy interest in their registration records (D) holding under smith that individuals do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in telephony metadata (E) holding that society recognizes a reasonable expectation of privacy
Output (English): holding under smith that individuals do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in telephony metadata