Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): from the common pleas court. Although Ap-pellees challenged the common pleas court’s order in this regard, as well as its order precluding Ms. Fleck from intervening in the termination proceedings, these issues are not currently being pursued before the Court. 7 . However, Rule of Appellate Procedure 311 specifically allows an appeal as of right, without reference to Pa.R.A.P. 341(c), from an order granting peremptory judgment in mandamus. See Pa.R.A.P. 311(a)(5). 8 . Apparently, the majority recognized that an appeal as of right from the interim suspension would not lie by virtue of the interlocutory character of the decision. See generally Pa. R.A.P. 341(a) (interposing finality as a prerequisite to appealability, as a general rule). 9 . Accord Kaplan, 388 Pa. at 220, 130 A.2d at 676 (<HOLDING>). Although the Commonwealth Court dissent was 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that a school acted impermissibly when a public school teacher was not rehired because allegedly he had relayed to a radio station the substance of a memorandum relating to teacher dress and appearance (B) recognizing application of sovereign immunity to school districts (C) recognizing a school districts implied authority to suspend a tenured teacher in circumstances where he could become an influence inimical to the best welfare of the children (D) holding school districts had standing to bring claims against the state asserting that school financing system had become unconstitutional (E) recognizing the districts duty of care for the protection of school children in its schools
Output (English): holding that a school acted impermissibly when a public school teacher was not rehired because allegedly he had relayed to a radio station the substance of a memorandum relating to teacher dress and appearance