Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): GMAC’s standing to foreclose on their home in the proper venue. However, for the purposes of the RESPA claim we find that GMAC was the appropriate party, but that the McLeans were unable to articulate any specific injury that was caused by GMAC’s failure to respond to their request for information. Further, Ms. McLean was capable of handling her affairs without the aid of a guardian ad litem, especially in light of the fact that Mr. McLean was a party to the suit. Therefore, we affirm the summary judgment of the district court. AFFIRMED. 1 . Although the McLeans asserted other claims below, which the court denied, they do not raise these claims on appeal, and, therefore, have abandoned them. See Timson v. Sampson, 518 F.3d 870, 874 (11th Cir.2008) (per curiam) (citation omitted) (<HOLDING>). In addition, we are cognizant of the fact 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that issues not briefed are deemed abandoned (B) holding that generally arguments not briefed on appeal are deemed abandoned or waived (C) holding that issues not argued on appeal are deemed abandoned (D) holding issues not adequately briefed on appeal are abandoned (E) holding that issues not briefed on appeal even by a pro se litigant are deemed abandoned
Output (English): holding that issues not argued on appeal are deemed abandoned