Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): damages. In re TMI Litig. Personal Injury Claims, No. 79-0906 (M.D.Pa. order entered Dec. 30, 1982); App. at 162. While these and companion TMI cases were being litigated in state and district court, the Supreme Court decided Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp., 464 U.S. 238, 104 S.Ct. 615, 78 L.Ed.2d 443 (1984), which held in part that states are precluded from regulating the safety aspects of nuclear energy but that states still had authority under the Act to control nonregulatory aspects of nuclear facilities. Id. at 240-41, 256, 104 S.Ct. at 617-18, 625-26. Following the decision in Silkwood, the district court denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment that had been filed following a Rule 16 confer ence. See In re Three Mile Island Litig., 605 F.Supp. 778, 784 (M.D.Pa.1985) (<HOLDING>) [referred to herein as “TMI I ”]. Shortly 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that punitive damages are not recoverable under viwda (B) holding that punitive damages are recoverable in a claim for retaliation under the flsa (C) holding that punitive damages are not recoverable against municipalities under  1988 (D) holding that punitive damages are not recoverable under subsection 216b (E) holding that punitive damages are recoverable under the priceanderson act to the extent that damages assessed under the act would not be paid from federal monies
Output (English): holding that punitive damages are recoverable in a claim for retaliation under the flsa