Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): that on separate occasions several years before, each had personally observed that appellant possessed, in his residence, nude photographs of young boys with whom he had had sexual relations. In addition, Broder-ick reported that he knew of at least 10 other young boys that appellant had sexually abused in his home. Moreover, as recently as five to six months prior to the execution of the search warrant, appellant had shown Broderick a photograph from his wallet of a nude 15-year-old boy. Because we read the affidavit, signed in early January 2009, in a commonsensical and realistic manner, drawing all reasonable inferences, we conclude that the magistrate could have reasonably concluded that appellant continued to be in possession of child pornography. See Flores, 319 S.W.3d at 703 (<HOLDING>); McKissick, 209 S.W.3d at 215 (magistrate 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that an anonymous tip must have sufficient indicia of reliability to justify a stop and frisk (B) holding anonymous tip regarding narcotic activity on unspecified date was sufficient when considering all circumstances (C) holding an anonymous tip insufficient to support reasonable suspicion based on the fact that defendant was suspected of drug activity in his community failed to corroborate he currently was engaged in drug related activity and surveillance failed to uncover any independent information that defendant was engaged in any criminal activity (D) holding that anonymous call that gave police no predictive information to corroborate tip lacked sufficient indicia of reliability to justify stop and frisk (E) holding anonymous tip that someone at the residence was dealing drugs did not amount to anything the tip was never substantiated and none of the occupants were ever charged with drug dealing
Output (English): holding an anonymous tip insufficient to support reasonable suspicion based on the fact that defendant was suspected of drug activity in his community failed to corroborate he currently was engaged in drug related activity and surveillance failed to uncover any independent information that defendant was engaged in any criminal activity