Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): Chapman, 118 S.W.3d 742, 750-51 (Tex.2003) (no-evidence summary judgment); Nixon v. Mr. Prop. Mgmt. Co., 690 S.W.2d 546, 548-49 (Tex.1985) (traditional summary judgment). 19 . See Argonaut Ins. Co. v. Allstate Ins. Co., 869 S.W.2d 537, 542 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1993, writ denied). 20 . First Nat’l Bank of Kerrville v. O’Dell, 856 S.W.2d 410, 415 (Tex.1993) (quoting Oury v. Saunders, 77 Tex. 278, 13 S.W. 1030, 1031 (1890)). 21 . Keck, Mahin & Cate v. Nat’l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, PA, 20 S.W.3d 692, 702 (Tex.2000) (quoting Argonaut, 869 S.W.2d at 542). 22 . Smart, 597 S.W.2d at 337. 23 . Oury, 13 S.W. at 1031. 24 . Galbraith-Foxworth Lumber Co. v. Long, 5 S.W.2d 162, 167 (Tex.Civ.App.-Dallas 1928, writ ref’d). 25 . Smart, 597 S.W.2d at 337. 26 . See Keck, 20 S.W.3d at 702 (<HOLDING>); Galbraith, 5 S.W.2d at 167 (defining an 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that place of performance of a life insurance contract was the state where premiums were made payable even if the contract was made in another state (B) holding that a party must at least have a subjective belief that litigation was a real possibility and that belief must have been objectively reasonable (C) holding that admission contained in an answer was binding despite the fact that it was made on information and belief (D) recognizing an insurers right to rescind an insurance contract where the insured has made fraudulent or material misrepresentation in insurance application (E) holding that payment made in reasonable belief that it was required by an insurance contract was involuntary
Output (English): holding that a party must at least have a subjective belief that litigation was a real possibility and that belief must have been objectively reasonable