Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): reporter's record, statements contained within other documents have been deemed sufficient “as long as the statement is made in time for the other parties to designate any additional relevant portions of the record and to prepare their appellate briefs.” Mason, 154 S.W.3d at 819; see Bennett v. Cochran, 96 S.W.3d 227, 229 (Tex.2002) (per curiam) (statement of points filed two months after request for reporter’s record sufficient to comply with Rule 34.6(c)(1), absent showing of prejudice by opposing party); Furr’s Supermarkets, Inc. v. Bethune, 53 S.W.3d 375, 377 (Tex.2001) (notice of statement of points given to opposing party in separate document on the same day as request for reporter’s record sufficient); Melton v. Toomey, 350 S.W.3d 235, 237 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2011, no pet.) (<HOLDING>). In the present case, however, Jill contends 
 Holding statements: (A) holding statement of points in notice of appeal sufficient (B) holding failure to timely file statement of points does not forfeit issues on appeal (C) holding failure to file statement of points is no bar to appeal (D) holding an argument to be waived for inadequate briefing and failure to raise the issue in the statement of points on appeal (E) holding failure to raise issue in statement of points does not forfeit it on appeal
Output (English): holding failure to timely file statement of points does not forfeit issues on appeal