Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): Establishment Clause for a public university to grant access to its facilities on a religion-neutral basis to a wide spectrum of student groups, including groups which use meeting rooms for sectarian activities, accompanied by some devotional exercises. Id. at-, 115 S.Ct. at 2523. 14 . Capitol Square involved a "full-fledged public forum” rather than a limited forum case. However, as the Court pointed out in Capitol Square by its reference to Lamb’s Chapel, the same principle applies in nonpublic forum cases. 15 . See, e.g., Chabad-Lubavitch v. Miller, 5 F.3d 1383 (11th Cir.1993) (en banc) (reversing to permit Chabad-Lubavitch to erect a menorah in Rotunda, a public forum); Americans United for Separation of Church & State v. City of Grand Rapids, 980 F.2d 1538 (6th Cir.1992) (en banc) (<HOLDING>). But see Chabad-Lubavitch v. City of 
 Holding statements: (A) holding no violation of federal establishment clause (B) holding that display of solitary semipermanent menorah in city hall park closely associated with seat of city government violates the establishment clause (C) holding there was no establishment clause violation in displaying a privately funded menorah during chanukah in the public plaza on which city hall and county building are located (D) holding that display of unattended menorah in city hall park quite close to seat of government violated establishment clause because its combination alongside a secular holiday display did not cause a viewer to see the exhibit as a whole or as a unitary symbol (E) holding that a city owned creche and christmas tree erected in a public park adjacent to another park with a christmas tree lights and a privately owned menorah did not offend the establishment clause
Output (English): holding that a city owned creche and christmas tree erected in a public park adjacent to another park with a christmas tree lights and a privately owned menorah did not offend the establishment clause