Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): by stating that any change in operations by NPS introduced by implementing actions under the CSP or Housing Plan will be subject to negotiation. Additionally, the level of contribution to the CIF would also be subject to negotiation. The evaluation panel wrote: YRT’s ‘assumption’ that plan implementations and contributions be renegotiated for any change in operations occasioned by implementation of each component of the Concession Services Plan or the Housing Plan is not an acceptable condition. We conclude that the present value of the proposer’s contribution to the CIF would be approximately $65.7 million over the life of the contract. This translates to an average percentage of 6.1% of the present value of gross receipts. Considering only the first four years of the contract (<HOLDING>), the proposer’s offer was $7.0 million. This 
 Holding statements: (A) recognizing that shall will and must are all mandatory terms (B) recognizing the equitable maxim that once equity has jurisdiction it will grant complete relief (C) holding that an action construing a will creating a trust is equitable in nature (D) recognizing exception (E) recognizing that nps will renegotiate the cif percentage
Output (English): recognizing the equitable maxim that once equity has jurisdiction it will grant complete relief