Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): Landgraf, 511 U.S. at-, 114 S.Ct. at 1505. The plaintiffs contend that FIRREA does not expressly state that it applies retroactively. Therefore, because it imposes new duties and affects the plaintiffs’ vested pension rights which arose in 1987, it cannot be applied retroactively to require them to follow an administrative claim procedure and now bar jurisdiction over their claims. The court agrees that FIRREA does not contain an express retroactivity provision. However, this does not require the court to find that the claims bar provision cannot apply to pension benefits which vested prior to FIR-REA’s enactment. The Ninth Circuit has had occasion to address the question of whether FIRREA applies retroactively. See Murphy v. F.D.I.C., 38 F.3d 1490, 1501 (9th Cir.1994) (en banc) (<HOLDING>); F.D.I.C. v. New Hampshire, 953 F.2d 478, 486 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that because apprendi does not apply retroactively neither does blakely (B) holding that 12 usc  1821d9 does not apply retroactively (C) holding miranda decision does not apply retroactively (D) holding that apprendi does not apply retroactively (E) holding that  523a13 does not apply retroactively
Output (English): holding that because apprendi does not apply retroactively neither does blakely