Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): tenants by the entireties. Because at the time they executed the Release, the Mahans had knowledge of Claim 7 and knew that it would be assigned to them, their execution of the Release released the bankruptcy estate from their right to assert Claim 7. Debtor’s argument that the Ma-hans did not release Claim 7 because they did not own it when they executed the Release is unavailing. “[A] general release which is not restricted by its terms to particular claims or demands ... will ordinarily be regarded as embracing all claims or demands which had [m]atured at the time of its execution.” Sottile v. Gains Constr. Co., 281 So.2d 558, 561 (Fla.3d Dist.Ct.App.1973), rev. denied, 289 So.2d 737 (Fla.1974), receded from on other grounds, Brown v. Brown, 432 So.2d 704 (Fla.3d Dist.Ct.App.1983) (<HOLDING>); Plumpton v. Continental Acreage Dev., 830 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that all inclusive language  from the beginning of the world to the days present barred all claims arising prior to releases execution (B) holding that release which barred all claims from the beginning of the world to the day of the date of these presents included all claims which had matured at the time of its execution (C) holding that despite release language discharging defendant from claims upon or by reason of any matter cause or thing whatsoever from the beginning of the world to the day of these presents release did not bar any claims accruing after the date of execution (D) holding that a release of such claims or other matters arising from the beginning of time to the date of execution of this agreement did not protect the defendant from liability arising from unconstitutional conduct that occurred after the agreements execution (E) holding equitable estoppel barred the plaintiffs claims because all of the claims of the amended complaint were in existence during the bankruptcy proceedings yet the plaintiff did not disclose any of the claims in its bankruptcy petitions plans of reorganization or disclosure statements
Output (English): holding that a release of such claims or other matters arising from the beginning of time to the date of execution of this agreement did not protect the defendant from liability arising from unconstitutional conduct that occurred after the agreements execution