Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): and Jones v. Greninger, 188 F.3d at 326 (finding that an inmate’s request for monetary damages on a failure to protect claim was barred by § 1997e(e) because he did not allege any physical injury). “The prohibitive feature of § 1997e(e), requiring physical injury before recovery, does not apply[, however,] in the context of requests for declaratory or injunctive relief sought to end an allegedly unconstitutional condition of confinement.” Herman v. Holiday, 238 F.3d at 665. (c) Failure to State a Claim To the extent that Plaintiff complains about retaliation, conspiracy, religious freedom, and equal protection, he has failed to state claims upon which relief can be granted despite having been given the opportunity to amend his pleadings. See Rodriguez v. United States, 66 F.3d at 98 (<HOLDING>). Plaintiff argues that many of the Defendants 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that dismissal of a pro se complaint for failure to state a claim should generally be without prejudice but if the plaintiff has been given an opportunity amend his complaint and fails to do so the dismissal may be with prejudice (B) holding that proper remedy for failure to exhaust is dismissal of the claim without prejudice (C) holding that dismissal of a complaint for insufficient jurisdictional allegations should be without prejudice to amend (D) holding that a review committee of the kansas board for discipline of attorneys had the authority to dismiss a complaint against an attorney with or without prejudice and when dismissal was ordered without specifying the nature of the dismissal the dismissal was without prejudice to the filing of later proceedings on the same matter (E) holding that when the allegations do not affirmatively negate a claim dismissal for failure to state a claim is appropriate only when the plaintiff has been given an opportunity to amend after special exceptions have been sustained
Output (English): holding that a review committee of the kansas board for discipline of attorneys had the authority to dismiss a complaint against an attorney with or without prejudice and when dismissal was ordered without specifying the nature of the dismissal the dismissal was without prejudice to the filing of later proceedings on the same matter