Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): amendment is not futile. Moreover, “the statute of limitations under the New York State Labor Law is six years, posing no hurdle to amendment here.” Hosking v. New World Mortg., Inc., 602 F.Supp.2d 441, 446 (E.D.N.Y.2009). However, with respect to plaintiff Vanderheydt, the Court finds that it lacks sufficient information to determine whether the proposed amendment would be futile because the Proposed Second Amended Complaint fails to provide the time period in which Vanderheydt contends he was denied minimum wage and overtime compensation in violation of the FLSA. Generally, the absence of such information from a complaint is grounds for dismissal pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). See DeSilva v. North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health Sys., Inc., 770 F.Supp.2d 497, 509 (E.D.N.Y.2011) (<HOLDING>). On the other hand, “the statute of 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that flsa which provides an exemption from the acts wage and overtime provisions for fishermen preempts claims under alaskas minimumwage and overtime statute (B) holding that a plan administrators decision to deny benefits was arbitrary and capricious even though an attending physician had submitted a form stating the plaintiff could sit for six hours stand for two hours and walk for two hours (C) holding that to state a claim for wage violations under the flsa plaintiffs must provide at least some approximation of the overtime hours that defendants required them to work and a time frame for when those hours were worked (D) holding that the flsa does not prohibit changes in wage rates it prohibits the payment of overtime at less than one and onehalf times the regular wage rate (E) holding illinois wage law only applied where at least some work was performed within the state
Output (English): holding that flsa which provides an exemption from the acts wage and overtime provisions for fishermen preempts claims under alaskas minimumwage and overtime statute