Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): that the allegations of sexual abuse or molestation and also being photographed by Bracigliano in a sexual manner are sufficient aggravating circumstances which, if accompanied by a permanent posttraumatic stress disorder, which is substantial, constitutes a “permanent loss of a bodily function” even without residual physical injury. Id. at 413, 696 A.2d 625; see also C.P. by J.P. v. Township of Piscataway Bd. of Educ., 293 N.J.Super. 421, 430-31, 681 A.2d 105 (App.Div.1996) (suggesting that a minor who had been subjected to an act of sexual contact by a swim instructor could cross the verbal threshold, provided plaintiff demonstrates a permanent psychological disability resulting from the molestation); A.C.R. by L.R. v. Vara, 264 N.J.Super. 565, 571-72, 625 A.2d 41 (Law Div.1992) (<HOLDING>). However, we agree with the Board that if 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that specific intent is not element of assault resulting in serious bodily injury (B) holding that loss of customers and resulting injury to goodwill can constitute irreparable harm that is not compensable by an award of money damages (C) holding that psychological conditions resulting from workrelated trauma are compensable (D) holding that sexual assault of a minor resulting in psychological harm may be compensable under the tca even in the absence of personal injury (E) holding that sexual assault coercion and harassment certainly may violate contemporary standards of decency and cause physical and psychological harm
Output (English): holding that specific intent is not element of assault resulting in serious bodily injury