Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): the ADA “to provide a clear and comprehensive national mandate for the elimination of discrimination against individuals with disabilities.” Wisconsin Cmty. Servs., Inc. v. City of Milwaukee, 465 F.3d 737, 750 (7th Cir.2006) (citing 42 U.S.C. § 12101(b)(1), (b)(4)). The Act “forbids discrimination against persons with disabilities in three major areas of public life: (1) employment, which is covered by Title I of the statute; (2) public services, programs and activities, which are the subjects of Title II; and (3) public and private lodging, which is covered by Title III.” Id. (citations omitted). It is now well-settled that prisons and correctional facilities are covered by Title II. Pennsylvania Dept. of Corrections v. Yeskey, 524 U.S. 206, 213, 118 S.Ct. 1952, 141 L.Ed.2d 215 (1998) (<HOLDING>). In order to prove a violation of Title II, 
 Holding statements: (A) holding prison official must have acted with reckless disregard for the inmates safety (B) holding that the plain text of title ii of the ada unambiguously extends to state prison inmates (C) holding that prison walls do not form a barrier separating prison inmates from the protections of the constitution (D) holding that state could be liable under ada for inaccessibility of company it contracted with to provide state inmates with jobs (E) holding that error was plain when the district courts ruling was obviously contrary to the text of a federal statute
Output (English): holding that error was plain when the district courts ruling was obviously contrary to the text of a federal statute