Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): 48 B.R. 916 (Bankr.D.Nev.1985) (<HOLDING>); In re Schwartz, 52 B.R. 314 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that in georgia pursuant to  9107 of the ucc refinancing of a promissory note transforms the obligation thereby destroying purchase money nature of the security interest therefore the creditor lost its purchase money security interest pmsi in a television set when the loans were consolidated and lien was avoidable id 89 br 264 18 bcd 58 (B) holding that a purchase money security in jewelry was not lost when the perfected purchase money security interest was consolidated with a subsequent retail installment contract (C) holding security interest in insurance premiums perfected by creation of security interest (D) holding courts must look to the law of the state in which the security interest was created to determine if creditor retains a purchase money security interest despite refinancing (E) holding that creditor held a purchase money security interest in household furniture by virtue of assignment of the retail installment contract from the seller
Output (English): holding courts must look to the law of the state in which the security interest was created to determine if creditor retains a purchase money security interest despite refinancing