Task: Text Categorization
Input (English): we find no relevant distinction between a spouse and a nonrelated third party, so long as the evidence supports compensability under the three-part test set out in currier v. roman l. hruska u.s. meat animal res. ctr.  for compensability of in-home care, our focus is on the  nature of the service provided, not the status or devotion of the provider of the service.
Output (English): non-overruling