Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): Judge. James Carter appeals a non-final order finding him in contempt of court for failing to pay temporary child support and temporary alimony. We affirm in part and reverse in part. Tina Carter filed a petition for dissolution of marriage against James Carter. After a hearing, James was ordered to pay weekly te the opportunity to include a purge provision in the contempt order. James Carter was sentenced to serve 30 days in the county jail, but the order does not permit him to purge himself anytime after incarceration. See Thurman v. Thurman, 637 So.2d 64, 65 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) (citing State ex rel. Coody v. Muszynski, 402 So.2d 81 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981) (<HOLDING>)). AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that a contempt finding may be averted if the alleged contemnor establishes 1 (B) holding that a civil contemnor must be permitted to be purged by complying with the disobeyed order (C) holding an issue must be raised to and ruled upon by the trial court in order to be preserved for review (D) holding that because civil contempt is only to obtain compliance it must be used only where the contemnor has the present ability to comply with the court order and the trial court specifically finds that the contemnor has that ability (E) holding that the district court committed reversible error by imposing criminal sanctions in a civil proceeding which did not afford the contemnor the procedural protections the constitution requires for the imposition of criminal contempt sanctions
Output (English): holding that the district court committed reversible error by imposing criminal sanctions in a civil proceeding which did not afford the contemnor the procedural protections the constitution requires for the imposition of criminal contempt sanctions