Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): provision is a condition precedent to the customer’s right to file an action against the bank to recover losses caused by the unauthorized signature or alteration”). 7 . An item (e.g., check) that contains less than the required number of signatures amounts to an “unauthorized signature.” See Va.Code 8.3A-403, Official Comment 4. 8 . See March 18, 2011 Hr’g Tr. 18:8-11. 9 . See March 18, 2011 Hr’gTr. 23:10-24:6. 10 . The Supreme Court of Virginia’s decision in Collins is consistent with its earlier deci sion in Radin v. Crestar Bank, 249 Va. 440, 457 S.E.2d 65, 66 (1995), holding that an attorney who opened a fiduciary account in which he deposited his client's funds was a "customer.” 11 . Cf. Thrash v. Georgia State Bank of Rome, 189 Ga.App. 21, 375 S.E.2d 112, 113 (Ga.Ct.App.1988) (<HOLDING>). 12 . It is worth noting that at least some 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that plaintiff an officer and shareholder of a corporation with signatory authority over the corporations checking account was not a customer of the bank and could not file suit for wrongful dishonor of the corporations checks (B) holding that while a state statute granted a foreign corporation the rights and privileges enjoyed by domestic corporations it did not transform such corporations into domestic or resident corporations (C) recognizing that a bank customer may have a tort claim against a bank for the wrongful dishonor of a check (D) holding president of corporation liable as employer where he inter alia maintained control over the corporations employment and pay practices and had the authority to make all major decisions regarding the corporations business affairs (E) holding that a corporations principal place of business for determining diversity jurisdiction under 28 usc  1332c1 is the nerve center meaning the corporations headquarters or the place where a corporations officers direct control and coordinate the corporations activities
Output (English): recognizing that a bank customer may have a tort claim against a bank for the wrongful dishonor of a check