Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): to regulate ... every public utility.... The exercise of such powers, rights, functions, and jurisdiction is prescribed as a duty of the commission.”). Whether exigent circumstances exist within the context of utility interim rate setting therefore “necessarily requires application of the [Commission’s] technical knowledge and expertise to the facts presented.” Minn. Ctr. for Envtl. Advocacy v. Minn. Pollution Control Agency, 644 N.W.2d 457, 464 (Minn.2002) (“A determination whether significant environmental effects result from this project is primarily factual and necessarily requires application of the agency’s technical knowledge and expertise.”); see also In re Review of 2005 Annual Automatic Adjustment of Charges for All Elec. & Gas Utils., 768 N.W.2d 112, 119 (Minn.2009) (<HOLDING>). The dissent contends that the determination 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that we consider an agencys expertise or special knowledge when  application of the regulation is primarily factual and necessarily requires application of the agencys technical knowledge and expertise to the facts presented citation omitted internal quotation marks omitted (B) holding that statutes are to be interpreted in accordance with the legislative intent and in a manner that will not render the statutes application absurd unreasonable or unjust internal quotation marks and citation omitted (C) recognizing that absent illegality we do not weigh the wisdom of any particular employment decision internal quotation marks and citation omitted (D) holding that we show  deference to an agencys conclusions in the area of its expertise (E) holding that the knowledge requisite to knowing violation of a statute is factual knowledge as distinguished from knowledge of the law
Output (English): holding that we show  deference to an agencys conclusions in the area of its expertise