Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): Commission argues that the decision in In re Farmers Frozen Food Co., 221 F.Supp. 385 (N.D.Cal.1963), is factually similar to the matter at bar, and should be followed to find that its assessment is a “tax.” In Farmers Frozen Food, decided under the Bankruptcy Act (“Act”), the court confronted the issue of whether an assessment levied pursuant to a marketing order under the California Marketing Act of 1937 was a “tax” so as to be afforded priority status. As with assessment funds collected by the Commission, monies collected under the marketing order were to be used for promotional and research activities benefiting another California commodity industry. In Farmers Frozen Food, the court determined that the marketing order assessment constituted a “tax” aft 2-03 (Bankr.S.D.Fla.1992) (<HOLDING>). Moreover, interpretation of the public 
 Holding statements: (A) holding unemployment taxes accrued when employees were terminated not when the amount of compensation taxes are determinable (B) holding that permit fee assessments required by statute are not taxes under the code (C) holding that permit fees imposed by statute were not taxes (D) holding that taxes are not private property that can be physically taken by the government (E) holding that background check assessments required by statute are not taxes under the code
Output (English): holding that permit fee assessments required by statute are not taxes under the code