Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): the Constitution and laws of this state .... Any home rule charter proposed as herein provided, may provide for such county officers as may be deemed necessary to carry out and perform all county functions as provided by charter or by general law .... The terms of all elective officers ... who are in office at the time of the adoption of a Home Rule Charter shall terminate as provided in the charter. ¶22 It is well established that a home rule charter county has “the right to conduct their purely local affairs without supervision by the state, so long as they abided by the provisions of the constitution and did not run counter to considerations of public policy of broad concern, expressed in general laws.” State ex rel. Carroll v. King County, 78 Wn.2d 452, 457-58, 474 P.2d 877 (1970) (<HOLDING>). However, because the CRC and Proposition 1 
 Holding statements: (A) holding a home rule charter county could hold elections at a different time than specified by state statute (B) holding that a charter county may assess a fee pursuant to florida statute section 3374013 and is not expressly or impliedly preempted by federal or state law (C) recognizing that a board of elections is not a political subdivision and its members are not county officers (D) holding that a state may not condition voting in state elections on payment of a tax (E) holding that the lehigh county sheriff is a county officer rather than a state officer
Output (English): holding that a charter county may assess a fee pursuant to florida statute section 3374013 and is not expressly or impliedly preempted by federal or state law