Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): to create judicial precedent consistent with the opinions of this Circuit, the federal judiciary generally, and, as this is a matter of international convention, reach a result not entirely devoid of the awareness of the potential for international disparity. Nonetheless, it should be noted that there is a paucity of case law dealing with intra-court comity. Courts follow the doctrine to provide a uniform interpretation of the law. See United States v. Anaya, 509 F.Supp. 289, 293 (S.D.Fla.1980), aff'd sub nom United States v. Zayas-Morales, 685 F.2d 1272 (11th Cir.1982). Unlike circuit court panels where one panel will not overrule another, see Julius v. Johnson, 755 F.2d 1403, 1404 (11th Cir.1985), district courts are not held to the same standard. See Anaya, 509 F.Supp. at 293 n. 2 (<HOLDING>). While the decisions of their fellow judges 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that an earlier precedential decision is binding precedent on later panels (B) holdings of the court of appeals not specifically reversed by the supreme court retain precedential value (C) recognizing that a prior panels holding is binding on all subsequent panels (D) holding that even district court cases decided by panels of three have no precedential value (E) holding onejustice opinion has no precedential value
Output (English): holding that an earlier precedential decision is binding precedent on later panels