Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): but it is "as provided in Section 30 of the Automated External Defibrillator Act.” The current version of the Good Samaritan Act was not in force at the time of Mr. Tobin's death, and therefore it cannot govern the issue retroactively. 45 . Plaintiffs seem to concede that the off-duty flight attendants are entitled to immunity under the Samaritan Act, but claim that on-duty flight attendants are not, because they worked "for compensation.” 46 . 745 Ill. Comp. Stat. § 49/10 (1998). 47 . In re Heanue, 355 Ill.App.3d 645, 291 Ill. Dec. 537, 823 N.E.2d 1123 (2005); see Johnson v. Matviuw, 176 Ill.App.3d 907, 126 Ill. Dec. 343, 531 N.E.2d 970 (1989). 48 . In re Heanue, 291 Ill.Dec. 537, 823 N.E.2d at 1129. See Rodas v. SwedishAmerican Health System Corp., 594 F.Supp.2d 1033 (N.D.Ill.2009) (<HOLDING>). But see Henslee v. Provena Hospitals, 373 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that under illinois law doctors were immune from civil damages under the samaritan act because they did not derive economic benefit directly from the service performed (B) holding that a municipality is immune from punitive damages under 42 usc  1983 (C) holding that payments from a tortfeasors insurer are not from a collateral source because they stem directly from the tortfeasor (D) holding that police officers were immune from liability for damages resulting from alleged intentional infliction of emotional distress (E) holding that port authority is immune from punitive damages
Output (English): holding that police officers were immune from liability for damages resulting from alleged intentional infliction of emotional distress