Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): OPINION BLACKBURN, District Judge. Currently before the court is the motion of plaintiff Linda N. Lewis to remand. Upon consideration of the record, the submissions of the parties, the argument of counsel, and the relevant law, the court is of the opinion that plaintiffs motion to remand is due to be granted. This dispute arises out of defendants’ decision to terminate plaintiffs employment. On February 1, 1996, plaintiff filed suit in the Tenth Judicial Circuit, Jefferson County, Alabama, alleging that defendants violated Alabama Code § 25-5-11.1, which prohibits an employer from terminating an employee for claiming workers’ compensation benefits under Alabama law. Defendants removed the case to federal court on March 20, 1996, and 725 (7th Cir.) (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 955, 115 S.Ct. 377, 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that  255111 claim does not arise under alabamas workers compensation laws (B) holding action did not arise under the patent laws (C) holding the retaliation claim did arise under states workers compensation laws (D) holding that illinois cause of action for retaliation does not arise under its workers compensation laws (E) holding that retaliation claim did not arise under states workers compensation laws
Output (English): holding action did not arise under the patent laws