Task: Text Completion
Input (English): landowner liability despite the fact that it was addressing possessor liability under Sections 343 and 343A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts. See, e.g., Hale, 116 P.3d at 268 ("Under section 343, if a landowner ‘should expect that [an invitee] will ... fail to protect [himself] against [a dangerous condition],’ the landowner must exercise reasonable care to protect him.”) (citing § 343(b), (c)) (emphases added); compare with Restatement (Second) of Torts, §§ 343, 343A (addressing dangerous conditions in regard to a "possessor of land”) (emphasis added). The Restatement defines "possessor” as "a person who is in occupation of the land with intent to control it.” Restatement (Second) of Torts, § 328E(a); see also Stevens v. Colorado Fuel and Iron, 24 Utah 2d 214, 469 P.2d 3, 5 (1970) (<HOLDING>). In Hale, the possessor was also the 
 Holding statements: (A) recognizing distinction between smith and mcdonnell (B) recognizing the distinction between a landowner and a possessor as defined by  328e of the restatement (C) recognizing distinction between two types of waiver (D) recognizing distinction between tolling and estoppel (E) recognizing this distinction
Output (English): (B)