Task: Text Completion
Input (English): of Rule 13.1(a) in 2002. See Tex.R.App. P. 13.1(a). However, the 2002 amendment followed substantial discussion of whether the duty should be mandatory or only upon request. See Hearing of the Supreme Court Advisory Committee, 5398-5425 (Jan. 25, 2002). The Supreme Court Advisory Committee on the Rules of Civil Procedure initially recommended that the rule be modified to make the duty operative only upon request. Id. 5398-99. However, the Supreme Court of Texas responded that it was “not inclined to change the Rule substantively.” Id. In the discussion that followed, it was pointed out that most trial court proceedings are not recorded, id. at 5403-04; section 52.046 of the Texas Government Code made the court reporter’s duty operative on Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2000, pet. ref'd) (<HOLDING>); but see Nabelek, — S.W.3d at -, 2005 WL 
 Holding statements: (A) recognizing collateral attack on void order (B) holding annexation ordinance void (C) holding that the word void is not sufficient (D) holding rule 131a void (E) holding void judgment must be vacated
Output (English): (D)