Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): under title 11, or arising in or related to cases under title 11.” See also 28 U.S.C. § 157(a); see, e.g., In re: Order of Reference to Bankruptcy Judges, General Order 2012-6 (S.D. Tex. May 24, 2012). Section 157 provides that bankruptcy judges may issue final orders or judgments where the matter is determined to be core, which includes “matters concerning the administration of the estate.” 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2); see also Bass v. Denney (In re Bass), 171 F.3d 1016, 1022 (5th Cir. 1999). A bankruptcy court has jurisdiction over a “related to” matter when the “outcome of that proceeding could conceivably have any effect on the estate being administered in bankruptcy.” Wood v. Wood (In re Wood), 825 F.2d 90, 93 (5th Cir. 1987); see also Arnold v. Garlock, 278 F.3d 426 (5th Cir. 2001) (<HOLDING>). This Court has jurisdiction over these 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that certainty or even likelihood of such an effect is not a requirement (B) holding that such statements were not even enough for an evidentiary hearing (C) holding that issue exhaustion is mandatory even if not a statutory jurisdictional requirement (D) holding that an effect on commerce is sufficient even though the effect is not immediate or direct or significant but instead is postponed indirect and slight (E) holding to the same effect
Output (English): holding that an effect on commerce is sufficient even though the effect is not immediate or direct or significant but instead is postponed indirect and slight