Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): v. Gray, 726 S.W.2d 125, 128 (Tex.Crim.App.1987). CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO CHOOSE COUNSEL The Sixth Amendment guarantees a criminal defendant the right to be represented by the retained counsel he prefers. U.S. Const. amend. VI; Wheat v. U.S., 486 U.S. 153, 158-60, 108 S.Ct. 1692, 1697, 100 L.Ed.2d 140 (1988). An accused is, in fact, entitled to “counsel of his own selection, and as many as he may see proper to employ, to defend him.” Jackson v. State, 55 Tex.Crim. 79, 115 S.W. 262, 264 (1908). This right is not absolute, however, but can be overridden by important considerations relating to the integrity of the judicial process and the fair and orderly administration of justice. See Wheat, 486 U.S. at 158-60, 108 S.Ct. at 1697; Webb v. State, 533 S.W.2d 780, 784 (Tex.Crim.App.1976) (<HOLDING>). However, the court must indulge a presumption 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that the case should be reopened where the cause has not proceeded so far that the ends of justice would be defeated or the orderly process of the court disturbed (B) holding that the right to choose counsel cannot be manipulated so as to obstruct the orderly procedure in the courts or to interfere with the fair administration of justice (C) holding court may raise procedural default sua sponte if doing so will further the interests of judicial efficiency conservation of scarce judicial resources and orderly and prompt administration of justice (D) recognizing the courts inherent sua sponte powers in certain circumstances to allow it to manage its own affairs so as to achieve the orderly and expeditious disposition of cases in the furtherance of justice quotation marks omitted (E) recognizing that a criminal defendants right to counsel is the right to the effective assistance of counsel
Output (English): recognizing that a criminal defendants right to counsel is the right to the effective assistance of counsel