Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): to procure blanket coverage. Anderson discusses the difference between blanket and specific coverage, noting that First State quoted 15 Couch on Insurance 2d 54:83 for the proposition that a schedule of property values in an insurance policy renders the policy coverage specific and not blanket: A distinction must be made between a policy which speaks in terms of a lump-sum obligation or value of the property and one which separately schedules different items of property. In the latter case, each separately treated item of property is in effect covered by a separate contract of insurance and the amount recoverable with respect to a loss affecting such property is determined independently of other items of property. 617 N.E.2d at 935. Upon application of 868, 870-71 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990) (<HOLDING>); Mackoul v. Fid. & Cas. Co. of N.Y., 402 So.2d 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that a wrongful death claim related back to a personal injury claim in an automobile accident case where the wrongful death claim  arose from the same transaction or occurrence as the original complaint and the defendant was advised of the essential facts necessary to prepare his defense even with the added claim (B) recognizing cause of action for wrongful death (C) holding that plaintiffs failure to prove decedents death was caused by the wrongful acts of the defendant precludes any recovery of wrongful death damages under mississippis wrongful death statute (D) holding emotional distress is a distinct claim from wrongful death (E) holding survivors entitled only to per person coverage since wrongful death claim was only one claim
Output (English): holding that plaintiffs failure to prove decedents death was caused by the wrongful acts of the defendant precludes any recovery of wrongful death damages under mississippis wrongful death statute