Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): it does not follow that the presentment of a defective complaint invests the trial court with jurisdiction. Under Huynh, defendants charged by complaint in municipal court may raise alleged defects in the complaint for the first time on appeal, even though, after the 1985 amendments to article five, section 12, of the Texas Constitution and to article 1.14(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, defendants charged by indictment or information could no longer raise such complaints for the first time on appeal. We therefore conclude, again based on Huynh, that if a complaint does not allege all the elements of an offense, the complaint is not a valid charging instrument, it does not invoke the jurisdiction of the trial court, and is therefore void. See, e.g., McElroy, 720 S.W.2d at 492 (<HOLDING>). We sustain appellant’s third point of error. 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that an indictment gave sufficient notice when the indictment charged the elements of the offense (B) holding that all five elements of  547b must be met (C) holding that a found in indictment need not allege all of the elements of entry (D) holding in a case predating the amendment to article five section 12 that to be a valid charging instrument and to invoke the trial courts jurisdiction an indictment must allege all essential and constituent elements of the offenses sought to be charged (E) holding that an indictment charging one offense during the commission of another crime need not allege the elements of the latter offense
Output (English): holding that an indictment gave sufficient notice when the indictment charged the elements of the offense