Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): pet. denied)). In conducting a legal sufficiency review, we consider only the evidence and inferences tending to support the finding, and we disregard all contrary evidence and inferences. KT., 68 S.W.3d at 890; K.C.M., 4 S.W.3d at 395. If any evidence of probative force exists to support the finding, we will uphold the decision. K.C.M., 4 S.W.3d at 395. In conducting a factual sufficiency review, we review all the evidence to determine if it was sufficient to produce a firm belief or conviction in the minds of the jury of the allegations pleaded. K.T., 68 S.W.3d at 890. To constitute clear and convincing evidence under the Mental Health Code, the evidence must -include expert testimony and “evidence of a recent, overt act or a continuing pattern of behavior that allas 1999, no pet.) (<HOLDING>); Johnstone v. State, 961 S.W.2d 385, 387-88 
 Holding statements: (A) holding evidence of patients delusion that she was pregnant and had sutures in her vagina not sufficient to meet required statutory burden (B) holding that trial court was not required to conclude that wife was disabled for alimony purposes where she testified about her disability and offered documentation of her social security disability benefits but where she produced no medical testimony and where other evidence indicated that she was otherwise active and did not stay in bed all day as she claimed (C) holding evidence of patients delusion that she was in military and that mail carrier was responsible for her welfare not sufficient to meet required statutory burden (D) holding evidence of patients schizophrenia auditory hallucinations paranoia irritability and refusal to take medication not sufficient to meet required statutory burden (E) holding evidence of patients psychotic behavior delusions that she had undergone surgery by satellite and had electronics implanted in her not sufficient to meet required statutory burden
Output (English): holding that trial court was not required to conclude that wife was disabled for alimony purposes where she testified about her disability and offered documentation of her social security disability benefits but where she produced no medical testimony and where other evidence indicated that she was otherwise active and did not stay in bed all day as she claimed