Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): reference to § 3553(a)(2)(A) and (3)). This is because supervised release “serves an entirely different purpose than the sentence imposed under § 3553(a).” Pepper v. United States, 562 U.S. 476, 502 n.15, 131 S.Ct. 1229, 179 L.Ed.2d 196. (2011). As the Supreme Court explained, ‘[supervised release fulfills rehabilitative . ends, . distinct from those served by incarceration.” Johnson, 529 U.S. at 59, 120 S.Ct. 1114. Pointing out that, “Congress intended supervised release to assist individuals in their transition to community -life,” id,, the Court has stressed that “supervised release, unlike incarceration, provides individuals with po-stconfinement assistance,” id, at 60, 120 S.Ct. 1114. See also Johnson v. United States, 529 U.S. 694, 708-09, 120 S.Ct. 1795, 146 L.Ed.2d 727 (2000) (<HOLDING>). The Supreme Court’s view- of the role of 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that further supervised release may be ordered as a sentence for violation of supervised release (B) recognizing the congressional policy in providing for a term of supervised release after incarceration is to improve the odds of a successful transition from the prison to liberty (C) holding that a statute requiring a threeyear term of supervised release did not eviscerate the district courts discretion to adjust the term of supervised release pursuant to  3583e (D) holding that term of supervised release was not automatically terminated when defendant was deported from united states and thus defendants subsequent commission of another offense illegal reentry after deportation prior to expiration of term of supervised release violated condition of supervised release that defendant commit no new offenses (E) recognizing district courts broad discretion to impose prison term up to the statutory maximum for violations of supervised release internal quotation marks omitted
Output (English): holding that term of supervised release was not automatically terminated when defendant was deported from united states and thus defendants subsequent commission of another offense illegal reentry after deportation prior to expiration of term of supervised release violated condition of supervised release that defendant commit no new offenses