Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): in the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, the right to counsel guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment, the right against self-incrimination guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment, and the right to confrontation and cross-examination guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment, apply in juvenile proceedings in which a juvenile can be imprisoned for a term of years. 1980 Doe, 62 Haw. at 72, 610 P.2d at 511; see also, e.g., In re Doe, 70 Haw. 32, 36-38, 761 P.2d 299, 302-03 (1988) (1988 Doe) (discussing Sixth Amendment right to confrontation) (abrogated in part on other grounds by State v. Moore, 82 Hawai'i 202, 220-22, 921 P.2d 122, 140-42 (1996) (re foundation required for excited utterance exception to hearsay rale)); In re Doe, 77 Hawai'i 46, 49, 881 P.2d 533, 536 (1994) (1994 Doe) (<HOLDING>). While HRS § 571-11(1) proceedings need not 
 Holding statements: (A) recognizing constitutional right to effective counsel (B) recognizing that a criminal defendants right to counsel is the right to the effective assistance of counsel (C) recognizing minors right to representation by counsel in a law violation proceeding (D) holding that there is no constitutional right to representation by counsel at a parole revocation (E) recognizing the right to counsel on appeal
Output (English): holding that there is no constitutional right to representation by counsel at a parole revocation