Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): so or how you do so will be up to you. You will have also some exhibits which will go back as well. If you think it’s helpful in your deliberations to review and peruse the exhibits, they will be available to you throughout the course of deliberations. Whether you use them or how you use them again will be up to you. I will arrange with the deputy to have some food and drinks served to you. Whether you partake of that or not and how you work with your deliberations will be up to you. It’s perfectly [sic] to eat and deliberate at the same time.” Mindful of the forfeiture considerations discussed herein, our earlier observations must be modified given the practical considerations of objecting to a judge’s comments to the jury. See People v. Sprinkle, 27 Ill. 2d 398, 189 N.E.2d 295 (1963) (<HOLDING>); People v. Sims, 192 Ill. 2d 592, 736 N.E.2d 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that a party waived its objections on appeal to an affidavit presented in support of a motion for summary judgment by failing to raise its objections to the trial court (B) recognizing the practical difficulties of contemporaneous objections to a trial judges conduct (C) holding that contemporaneous objections were required to preserve for appeal improper comments on defendants right to remain silent (D) recognizing states duty to preserve relevant evidence where practical (E) holding that issue is preserved if the objections at the trial were sufficiently specific to notify the trial court at the time of the nature and character of the objections and the reasons for them
Output (English): holding that contemporaneous objections were required to preserve for appeal improper comments on defendants right to remain silent