Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): v. Seldin. h. Item 58: Wording in Legend When 20-20 Design produces a floor plan, it prints out a legend. (Davis Aff. 57.) From left to right, this legend contains a note about dimensions, a logo, an intellectual property claim, and the dates on which the plan was designed and printed. The text of the note about dimensions is taken verbatim from the National Kitchen and Bath Association (“NKBA”) legend. (Real View App. 65.) 20-20 cannot therefore assert copyright protection over that part of the legend, despite accidentally omitting one word of the NKBA version. However, the intellectual property note appears to be original to 20-20, and although basic, may be entitled to copyright protection. See, e.g., Am. Dental Ass’n v. Delta Dental Plans Ass’n, 126 F.3d 977, 979 (7th Cir.1997) (<HOLDING>). i. Items 59-61: ProKitchen 2.2’s Help menu 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that although notice and comment procedures are not required to trigger chevron deference such procedures are significant  in pointing to chevron authority (B) holding that error in classifying agents testimony as lay opinion and failing to subject it to the disclosure requirements was harmless (C) holding california postdeprivation recovery procedures satisfy due process despite lack of notice to claimant of recovery procedures (D) holding that the extradition procedures are a matter of state law (E) holding numbers short descriptions and long descriptions in taxonomy classifying dental procedures copyrightable
Output (English): holding that error in classifying agents testimony as lay opinion and failing to subject it to the disclosure requirements was harmless