Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): 17200 of the Business and Professions Code will not support an award of punitive damages. Id. (citing Newport Components v. NEC Home Electronics, 671 F.Supp. 1525, 1550-51 (C.D.Cal.1987)). Indeed, it is settled law that punitive damages are not available under section 17200. See Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp., 29 Cal.4th 1134, 1148, 131 Cal. Rptr.2d 29, 63 P.3d 937 (2003) (“While the scope of conduct covered by the UCL is broad, its remedies are limited. A UCL action is equitable in nature; damages cannot be recovered.... We have stated that under the UCL, ‘[prevailing plaintiffs are generally limited to injunctive relief and restitution.’ ”) (internal citations omitted); see also Dozier v. Maispace, No. C-05-1761, 2007 WL 518622, *10 (N.D.Cal.2007) (Trumbull, Mag. J.) (<HOLDING>) (citing Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Santa Cruz 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that punitive damages are not recoverable against municipalities under  1988 (B) holding that neither compensatory nor punitive damages are recoverable under section 17200 (C) holding that punitive damages are not recoverable under subsection 216b (D) holding that punitive damages are recoverable in a claim for retaliation under the flsa (E) holding that punitive damages are not recoverable under viwda
Output (English): holding that punitive damages are not recoverable under viwda