Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): paying $1,000 each month (Cf. Doc 43, p. 7, line 19). 9 . A true comparison of the Schedule J expenses and the Form B22C expenses cannot be made because they are described, calculated, and grouped differently from each other. 10 .The court notes that, although raised by the parties, the narrow exception for "special circumstances” found in 11 U.S.C. § 707(b)(2)(B) is a confirmation issue and not a post-confirmation modification issue. Kolb never discusses post-confirmation modification, except to raise the question this decision addresses. In re Kolb, 366 B.R. 802, 817, n. 21 (Bankr.S.D.Ohio 2007). 11 . The text in italics represents language added and the strikeout text is language removed by the enactment of BAPCPA. 12 . See, e.g., In re Solis, 172 B.R. 530 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.1994) (<HOLDING>) and Sunahara v. Burchard (In re Sunahara), 326 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that plaintiff entitled to recover for changes not incorporated into contract under theory of breach (B) holding that the general corporate laws are incorporated into the corporate charter (C) holding that a court in deciding a rule 12b6 motion may consider a document that is incorporated by reference into the complaint (D) holding  1325b is incorporated into  1329 (E) holding patent policy incorporated by reference into patent agreement
Output (English): holding that plaintiff entitled to recover for changes not incorporated into contract under theory of breach