Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): the majority’s opinion that court costs are likewise not awardable. Utah Code' Ann. § 13 — 7—4(d) (1992) states: Any business establishment or place of public accommodation or enterprises regulated by the state charged with maintaining a public nuisance in violation of this act, which is determined or found not to be in violation of this act, may be awarded all actual and necessary expenses incurred in defending such action, as determined and approved by the court having jurisdiction of the matter. Thus, under the plain language of this section, the decision to award expenses rests with the discretion of the trial court. Expenses related to defending a cause of action clearly include court costs. See, e.g., Copper Liquor, Inc. v. Adolph Coors Co., 684 F.2d 1087, 1098 (5th Cir.1982) (<HOLDING>), rev’d on other grounds, International 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that simple assault includes urinating on another (B) holding that deposition expenses are an allowable cost (C) holding that personal grooming expenses are not deductible (D) holding that deposition expenses are not an allowable cost (E) holding that expenses includes costs
Output (English): holding that simple assault includes urinating on another