Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): of FOIA litigation. The first focuses on the sufficiency of the factual basis or, in other words, the Vaughn index. At this stage an agency may show that a generalized Vaughn index, one that presents the withheld documents in groupings rather than individually, is appropriate. See Bevis, 801 F.2d at 1389 (Exemption 7(A)); see also In re Department of Justice, 999 F.2d 1302, 1309 (8th Cir.1993) (describing the necessary showing to justify a generalized Exemption 7(A) index). The second stage confronts dispositive motions, e.g., at summary judgment. This refers to a court’s assessment of whether the exercise of the Exemption is legitimate. See United States Dep't of Justice v. Reporters Comm. for Freedom of the Press, 489 U.S. 749, 780, 109 S.Ct. 1468, 1485-86, 103 L.Ed.2d 774 (1988) (<HOLDING>). These two stages are somewhat different. An 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that a third party has authority to consent to a search if the third party is a coinhabitant (B) holding that a draft rap constituted a final remedial design (C) holding that where a third partys conduct is closely related to the contractual relationship or the contractual dispute and where the third party enjoys financial benefit from the contract the forum selection clause applies to the third party (D) recognizing that a forum selection clause also applies to a nonsignatory third party where the third partys conduct is closely related to the contractual relationship or the contractual dispute and where the third party enjoys financial benefit from the contract (E) holding that exemption 7c categorically applies when a third party requestor seeks fbi rap sheets
Output (English): holding that a draft rap constituted a final remedial design