Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): and ethnicity, all of which may be a great deal more sensitive than the electrical consumption records at issue in Maxfield. In addition, DOL records easily reveal the driver’s address, which many people, especially the victims of domestic violence, legitimately desire to keep private to protect their personal safety. The sensitive nature of this personal information supports the legislature’s finding of a privacy interest in the records. The second prong of the article I, section 7 analysis is whether the government intrusion into private affairs was conducted with or without the authority of law. Maxfield, 133 Wn.2d at 342. The State has a legitimate police power interest in allowing the police access to these records in performance of their duties. See Laws of 1990, ch. 232, § 1 (<HOLDING>). In this case, the evidence clearly 
 Holding statements: (A) recognizing the extraordinary value of the vehicle title and registration records for law enforcement (B) holding that a hearing would serve no purpose because the registration act and notification law subject all sex offenders as defined by the registration act to the registration and notification provisions and law enforcement authorities have no discretion to determine which offenders would be exposed to public dissemination (C) holding that sornas registration requirements and criminal enforcement provision are proper under the commerce clause (D) recognizing the value of leveraging the governments limited enforcement resources (E) holding that the postmark on the registration application was the determining factor when a registration is subsequently approved
Output (English): holding that the postmark on the registration application was the determining factor when a registration is subsequently approved