Task: Text Categorization
Input (English): to the extent that our holdings in patman v. state, 244 ga.app. 833, 537 s.e.2d 118 (2000), shivers v. state, 258 ga.app. 253, 573 s.e.2d 494 (2002), state v. fossett, 253 ga.app. 791, 560 s.e.2d 351 (2002), state v. charles, 264 ga.app. 874, 592 s.e.2d 518 (2003), boldin v. state, 282 ga.app. 492, 639 s.e.2d 522 (2006), and martinezvargas v. state, 317 ga.app. 232, 730 s.e.2d 633 (2012), could be interpreted as support for the premise that the odor of raw marijuana emanating from a particular location cannot be the sole basis for the issuance of a search warrant for that location, such interpretations are hereby disapproved.
Output (English): overruling