Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): Plaintiffs did not provide translated documents. The United States and Italy are both signatories to the Hague Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extra-Judicial Documents in Civil and Commercial Matters (“Hague Convention”). The Supreme Court set out the test for the applicability of the Hague Service Convention in Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Schlunk, 486 U.S. 694, 108 S.Ct. 2104, 100 L.Ed.2d 722 (1988). The Convention itself states that it shall apply “in all cases ... where there is occasion to transmit a judicial or extrajudicial document for service abroad.” Schlunk, 486 U.S. at 699, 108 S.Ct. 2104 (citing 20 U.S.T. 362, 362), and the Supreme Court held that whether an “occasion ... for service abroad” existed depended on the internal la (N.D.Fla.1989) (<HOLDING>). Generally, the Hague Convention requires each 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that service was not perfected on the defendant german corporation because the plaintiff had failed tostrictly comply with the servieeofprocess requirements of the hague convention (B) holding that service of process by international registered mail from germany to the united states satisfied the hague convention and constitutional due process (C) holding because fla stat  48161 required sending of notice and process directly to the defendant under schlunk hague convention applies (D) holding hague convention applies to service of foreign defendant pursuant to fla stat  48181 and 48161 (E) holding that the hague service convention is selfexecuting
Output (English): holding that service of process by international registered mail from germany to the united states satisfied the hague convention and constitutional due process