Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): rights. See U.S. Const, amend. VI. “The Sixth Amendment rights to notice, confrontation, and compulsory process guarantee that a criminal charge may be answered through the calling and interrogation of favorable witnesses, the cross-examination of adverse witnesses, and the orderly introduction of evidence.” State v. Gillian, 360 S.C. 433, 449-450, 602 S.E.2d 62, 71 (Ct.App.2004); accord State v. Mizzell, 349 S.C. 326, 330, 563 S.E.2d 315, 317 (2002); State v. Graham, 314 S.C. 383, 385, 444 S.E.2d 525, 527 (1994); Schmidt, 288 S.C. at 303, 342 S.E.2d at 402. The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment ensures these rights are extended to criminal defendants in state courts. See U.S. Const, amend. XIV; Pointer v. Texas, 380 U.S. 400, 403-404, 85 S.Ct. 1065, 13 L.Ed.2d 923 (1965) (<HOLDING>); Mizzell, 349 S.C. at 330, 563 S.E.2d at 317 
 Holding statements: (A) holding the sixth amendment applicable to the states through the fourteenth amendment (B) holding that the fifth amendments protection against selfincrimination is applicable to the states through the fourteenth amendment (C) holding second amendment right is incorporated against the states through fourteenth amendment (D) holding that the fourteenth amendment incorporated the sixth amendment right to counsel (E) holding that the confrontation clause is applicable to the states through the fourteenth amendment
Output (English): holding that the fifth amendments protection against selfincrimination is applicable to the states through the fourteenth amendment