Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): GUIDO CALABRESI, DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON, GERARD E. LYNCH, Circuit Judges. SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff-Appellant Heptagon Creations Ltd. (“Heptagon”) appeals from a judgment granting Defendants-Appellees’ motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint in its entirety for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. A designer of high-end furniture, Heptagon contends that the District Court erred in dismissing its claim for copyright infringement against Defendants-Appellees Core Marketing Group, LLC, Pleskow & Rael Corporation, and Thomas Rael (“Defendants”) for copying nine of its furniture designs without permission. Because Heptagon does not press any of its other claims on appeal, it has waived those claims. See LoSacco v. City of Middletown, 71 F.3d 88, 92 (2d Cir.1995) (<HOLDING>). We review a district court’s grant of a 
 Holding statements: (A) holding issues not raised in appellate brief are waived (B) holding issues which are not specifically raised and argued in a partys opening brief are waived (C) holding that issues which are not specifically raised and argued in a partys opening brief are waived (D) holding that issues not raised in a partys opening brief are waived (E) holding issues that are not specifically raised and argued in a partys opening brief are waived
Output (English): holding issues that are not specifically raised and argued in a partys opening brief are waived