Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): Virgin Islands, except where a direct review may be had in the Supreme Court. The jurisdiction of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit shall be limited to the jurisdiction described in sections 1292(c) and (d) and 1295 of this title. 28 U.S.C. § 1291. 18 . In an effort to meet this burden, during the April 25, 2012 Hearing, U.S. Steel’s counsel argued that its Motion for Expedited Relief (Docket No. 53) and Motion to Seal (Docket No. 64) were akin to a motion for an injunction. (Docket No. 209 at p. 14, Ins. 11-12). Although obtaining an injunction can render prevailing party status, such status is only awarded in cases where the underlying lawsuit seeks permanent injunctive relief. See e.g. Sole v. Wyner, 551 U.S. 74, 86, 127 S.Ct. 2188, 167 L.Ed.2d 1069 (2007) (<HOLDING>); Singer Mgmt. Consultants, Inc. v. Milgram, 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that attorneys fees awards are available under  1988 for frivolous actions (B) holding that interim awards of attorneys fees are inappropriate where the only relief obtained is a preliminary injunction which may be subsequently overturned on the merits (C) holding preliminary injunction improper where it exceeded the relief sought and granted the same relief which would have been given in a final order of permanent injunction (D) holding that a district court may award attorneys fees while the merits are on appeal (E) holding that a preliminary injunction reversed on appeal does not support an award of attorneys fees
Output (English): holding preliminary injunction improper where it exceeded the relief sought and granted the same relief which would have been given in a final order of permanent injunction