Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): Hobbs v. State, 298 S.W.3d 193, 197 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009). 8 . Marquez v. State, 921 S.W.2d 217, 220 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (quoting Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145, 149, 88 S-Ct. 1444, 20 L.Ed.2d 491 (1968)). 9 . "The defendant in a criminal prosecution for any offense other than a capital felony case [seeking the death penalty] ... shall have the right, upon entering a plea, to waive the right of trial by jury. ...” Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 1.13. 10 . Marquez, 921 S.W.2d at 220 ("While article 1.13 provides for the method by which a jury may be waived, it does not provide for the undoing of such waiver.”). 11 . Id. at 221. 12 . Id. at 222. 13 . Id. at 223. 14 . Id. (citing Wheatfall v. State, 882 S.W.2d 829, 838 (Tex. Crim. App. 1994). 15 . Id. See also Hobbs, 298 S.W.3d at 199 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to allow the withdrawal of the juiy trial waiver (B) holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to disqualify an attorney based on a matter not raised by the opposing party until only weeks prior to trial (C) holding trial court abused its discretion by refusing to allow questions regarding victims status as a child (D) holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing amendments to pleadings because they came too late (E) holding trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding violation was willful and substantial
Output (English): holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing amendments to pleadings because they came too late