Task: Text Completion
Input (English): (2005). 7 .For a Petitioner to prevail under the Vaccine Act, "a petitioner must prove either a 'Table' injury or that a vaccine listed on the Table was the cause in fact of an injury (and of an 'Off Table’ injury).” Dec. 2. GBS is not a Table injury. 8 . As proof for the proposition that Dr. Pike’s theory was “probative,” Petitioner cites to or discusses medical and other literature that was never submitted in the case before the Chief Special Master. Vaccine Rule 8(f) states that "any fact or argument not raised specifically in the record before the special master will be considered waived and cannot be raised by either party in proceedings on review of a special master's decision.” RCFC App. B, Vaccine Rule 8(f); see also Jay v. Sec’y of HHS, 998 Fed. 979, 983 n. 4 (Fed.Cir.1994) (<HOLDING>). The Court, therefore, will strike these 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that argument offered in defense of decision below had been waived when not raised below (B) holding that petitioners had abandoned arguments not raised below (C) holding that   1252d1 bars the consideration of bases for relief that were not raised below and of general issues that were not raised below but not of specific subsidiary legal arguments or arguments by extension that were not made below (D) holding that arguments not raised below are waived for appeal (E) holding that arguments not briefed are abandoned
Output (English): (B)