Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): apply to statutory appeals in general, or to assessment appeals specifically. Instead, the Supreme Court stated: [O]ur trial courts have had the right to enact rules and publish these to cover practice in this area of the law. Where they have not created and published such local rules, then each trial court has been vested with the full authority of the court to make rules of practice for the proper disposition of cases before them and that we have enforced those rules unless they violated the Constitution or laws of the Commonwealth or United States, or our state-wide rules. Id. at 554. Where no local rule exists, the trial court may, but is not required to, apply the Pa. R.C.P. by analogy. See, e.g., Codispot v. Butler County Tax Claim Bureau, 938 A.2d 499, 503-04 (Pa.Cmwlth.2007) (<HOLDING>). Here, no local rule governs how an appellant 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that rule does not apply where defendant made false representations (B) holding that the requirements of rule 3700 apply to resentencing (C) holding a local government sued under  1983 has no immunity even if its employee is entitled to qualified immunity and the court of appeals does not have jurisdiction over the local governments interlocutory appeal (D) holding that procedural bar rule does not apply to ineffectiveness claims (E) holding that while pa rcp no 2271 does not apply to tax assessment appeals the trial court has discretion to apply its requirements where no local rule exists
Output (English): holding a local government sued under  1983 has no immunity even if its employee is entitled to qualified immunity and the court of appeals does not have jurisdiction over the local governments interlocutory appeal