Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): the rulings of the Alaska Supreme Court regarding releases ..., and it remains its intention to release the above described Claims. Section 3. Release by [Old Harbor]. [The release language is virtually identical to Section 2 with Old Harbor replacing Akhiok]. 8 . 852 P.2d 1146, 1150-52 (Alaska 1993). 9 . Id. at 1152. 10 . See Witt v. Watkins, 579 P.2d 1065, 1067-68 (Alaska 1978). 11 . See id. 12 . See Diagnostic Imaging Ctr. Assocs. v. H & P, 815 P.2d 865, 867-68 (Alaska 1991). 13 . See National Soil Servs., Inc. v. Hurst, 630 P.2d 3, 7 (Alask d 438, 440 (1963) ("joint venturers like partners owe the duty of finest loyalty and such loyalty continues throughout the life of the venture and its dissolution"); accord Lavin v. Ehrlich, 80 Misc.2d 247, 363 N.Y.S.2d 50, 52 (N.Y.App.1974) (<HOLDING>). t 19 . See Karchmar, 236 Ill.Dec. 378, 707 
 Holding statements: (A) holding partner owes fiduciary duty in dealings effecting the winding up of the partnership and the proper preservation of partnership assets during that time (B) holding that a retiring partner or the representative of a deceased partner is a creditor of the partnership in the amount of the retiring or deceased partners partnership interest (C) holding only a party to the partnership agreement can breach it and be liable for a breach of fiduciary duty relating to partnership obligations (D) holding that under the texas uniform partnership act the government was entitled to collect the  tax liability indisputably a partnership debt from any one of the general partners (E) holding that under texas law limited partner could not bring breach of fiduciary duty claims without the partnership because the partners claims would be indirect and duplicative of the partnerships claims
Output (English): holding only a party to the partnership agreement can breach it and be liable for a breach of fiduciary duty relating to partnership obligations