Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): Hauer & Feld, L.L.P., 105 S.W.3d 244, 252 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th. Dist.] 2003, pet. denied); Int'l Bank of Commerce-Brownsville v. Int’l Energy Dev. Corp., 981 S.W.2d 38, 48 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1998, pet. denied), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1137, 120 S.Ct. 982, 145 L.Ed.2d 932 (2000); Bull HN Info. Sys., Inc. v. Hutson, 229 F.3d 321, 331 (1st Cir.2000). 12 . Tex. Commerce Bank v. Universal Technical Inst. of Tex., Inc., 985 S.W.2d 678, 680 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, pet. dism’d w.o.j.). 13 . Burlington N. R.R. Co. v. TUCO, Inc., 960 S.W.2d 629, 636 (Tex.1997); Tex. Commerce Bank, 985 S.W.2d at 680. 14 . See, e.g., TUCO, 960 S.W.2d at 633. 15 . Id. at 637. 16 . See Houston Vill. Builders, Inc. v. Falbaum, 105 S.W.3d 28, 35 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, pet. denied) (<HOLDING>); Tex. Commerce Bank, 985 S.W.2d at 681 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that upon vacating an arbitration award the court has the discretion to remand to the same arbitrator or different arbitrator (B) holding that each individual member of an unincorporated association is a client of the associations lawyer (C) holding that undisclosed representation of an association that the arbitrator disclosed he was a member of and the association will be affected by the outcome of the case is evident partiality (D) holding that while the determination of the scope of an arbitration agreement is for the court the enforcement of pleading requirements before the arbitrator is a procedural matter for the arbitrator (E) holding that because the parties agreed to arbitrate and both placed the issue before the arbitrator the issue of consolidation was for the arbitrator
Output (English): holding that because the parties agreed to arbitrate and both placed the issue before the arbitrator the issue of consolidation was for the arbitrator