Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Dill, 108 A.3d 882, 885 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2015) (en banc) (“On appeal, we will not consider assignments of error that were not brought to the tribunal’s attention at a time at which the error could have been corrected or the alleged prejudice could have been mitigated.”), petition for allowance of appeal filed, No. 69 EAL 2015 (Pa. Feb. 11, 2015). The proposition is also well settled that a party may not raise for the first time an argument not previously made to a lower court by inserting the issue into a statement of matters complained of on appeal pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b). “A party cannot rectify the failure to preserve an issue by proffering it in response to a Rule 1925(b) order.” Glenbrook Leasing Co. v. Beausang, 839 A.2d 437, 444 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2003) (<HOLDING>), aff’d per curiam, 584 Pa. 129, 870 A.2d 318 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that an issue not raised on appeal is waived (B) holding under parap 302a issue not raised until after summary judgment was granted and then only in a statement of matters complained of on appeal was waived for purposes of appeal (C) holding that issue not raised in a statement filed pursuant to parap 1925b is waived for purposes of appeal (D) holding issue not raised in the bankruptcy court was waived on appeal (E) holding an issue not raised in the bankruptcy court was waived on appeal
Output (English): holding that issue not raised in a statement filed pursuant to parap 1925b is waived for purposes of appeal