Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): Fed.R.Civ.P. 39(a). But neither the Seventh Amendment, nor any other provision of the Constitution, preserves any right to a bench trial. Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. Westover, 359 U.S. 500, 510, 79 S.Ct. 948, 3 L.Ed.2d 988 (1959). Plaintiff initially sought compensatory damages in an amount to be determined by the court, which triggered Principal Summa’s Seventh Amendment rights. See U.S. Const, amend. VII. But the right to a jury trial does not depend only on the initial pleadings. See Hildebrand, 607 F.2d at 709-10. When subsequent events leave only equitable issues to be resolved, the right to a jury trial does not exist and is not preserved by the Seventh Amendment or Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 38. See id.; see also Wall v. Trust Co. of Ga., 946 F.2d 805, 809 (11th Cir.1991) (<HOLDING>). So, the dismissal of Principal Summa’s 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that if the federal claims are dismissed before trial  the state claims should be dismissed as well (B) holding that no right to a jury trial existed after one of the plaintiffs claims was dismissed leaving only an equitable claim (C) holding one example of a claim is a right to an equitable remedy that can be satisfied by an alternative right to payment (D) recognizing that the determination is an equitable one (E) holding that back pay was an integral part of title vips equitable remedies and that therefore no right to jury trial existed
Output (English): holding one example of a claim is a right to an equitable remedy that can be satisfied by an alternative right to payment