Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): outpatient care for Campbell and filed a certificate with the trial court. After receiving this certificate, the trial court conducted a hearing before the expiration of the commitment order, to determine if Campbell continues to meet the criteria for involuntary commitment and whether the trial court should order Campbell to participate in a prescribed regimen of medical, psychiatric, or psychological care or treatment on an outpatient basis. The hearings that resulted in the June 30, 2003 commitment order were conducted under article 46.03, section 4(d)(5). Under the unambiguous language of this statute, the trial court must conduct these hearings “pursuant to the provisions of the Mental Health Code.... ” Tex.Code Crim. Proc. art. 46.03, § 4(d)(5); Campbell, 85 S.W.3d at 181 (<HOLDING>). The Texas Supreme Court already has decided 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that texas legislature has no police power to violate article i section 16 of the texas constitution because section 29 emphatically and unambiguously excepts this power from the powers of the government of the state of texas (B) holding that article 4603 section 4d5 hearing was required to be conducted pursuant to the texas mental health code (C) recognizing a constitutional right of privacy in mental health records (D) recognizing counsels ability to waive statutory right to a mental health hearing (E) holding  574032 574035 and 574036 applied to one of campbells prior hearings under article 4603 section 4d5
Output (English): holding that texas legislature has no police power to violate article i section 16 of the texas constitution because section 29 emphatically and unambiguously excepts this power from the powers of the government of the state of texas