Task: Text Completion
Input (English): subject-matter jurisdiction cannot be conferred by consent, waiver, or estoppel at any stage of a proceeding and may be recognized by an appellate court on its own motion or raised by a party for the first time on appeal). 26 . See Tex. Ass’n of Bus., 852 S.W.2d at 445-46; Trojacek, 2009 WL 909591, at *3; Somers, 295 S.W.3d at 8, 10, 13. 27 . See Tex. Bus. Orgs.Code Ann. § 21.562; Arkoma Basin Exploration Co. v. FMF Assoc. 1990-A, Ltd., 249 S.W.3d 380, 387 (Tex.2008); In re Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc., 2013 WL 5470089, at *6; Connolly, 257 S.W.3d at 839; Pate v. Elloway, No. 01-03-00187-CV, 2003 WL 22682422, at *1-2 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] Nov. 13, 2003, pet. denied) (mem. op.). 28 . See Tex. Bus. Orgs.Code Ann. § 21.562; Arkoma Basin Exploration Co., 249 S.W.3d at 387 (<HOLDING>); In re Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc., 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that federal law governs remedies available under title ix (B) recognizing rule that state law governs the substance of claims in bankruptcy proceedings (C) holding texas law governs procedural matters (D) holding texas law governs the procedural matter of preservationoferror requirements even if another jurisdictions law governs substantive issues (E) holding state law governs disputed ownership of lands
Output (English): (D)