Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): August 2001. He then made a payment of $658.19 in October 2001 but did not make any other payments until a year later, on October 28, 2002, when he began making weekly payments of $155.48 through the first week of December 2002 (for a total of six payments). In addition, on December 5, 2002, Roberts made two payments in the amounts of $2,250.00 and $1,363.95. 10 . We do not address the remainder of the issue, in which Roberts asks the court to remand the case for consideration of his attorney’s fees, because he provides no discussion or citation to authority for this request and because he does not point us to anywhere in the record showing that he requested attorney’s fees from the trial court. See Hall v. Stephenson, 919 S.W.2d 454, 466-67 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 1996, writ denied) 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that an appellate court may review the entire record to determine whether hearsay statements are sufficiently reliable (B) holding that appellate court will not consider an argument on appeal that is different from the specific argument presented to the trial court even if it relates to the same general issue (C) holding that an appellate court is not required to search the appellate record with no guidance from the briefing party to determine if the record supports the partys argument (D) holding the appellate standard of review in fourth amendment search and seizure cases is limited to determining whether any evidence supports the trial courts finding and the appellate court may only reverse where there is clear error (E) holding that where the appellant has failed to demonstrate error the court is not required to search the record for an error
Output (English): holding the appellate standard of review in fourth amendment search and seizure cases is limited to determining whether any evidence supports the trial courts finding and the appellate court may only reverse where there is clear error