Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): is no evidence supporting the findings or the findings fail to support the judgment. We do not reweigh the evidence, but consider only the evidence favorable to the trial court’s judgment. Those appealing the trial court’s judgment must establish that the findings' are clearly erroneous. Findings are clearly' erroneous when a review of the record leaves us firmly convinced that a mistake has been made. We do not defer to conclusions of law, however, and evaluate them de novo. Smith v. Smith, 938 N.E.2d 857, 860 (Ind.Ct.App.2010) (citations omitted). II. Natural Parent Presumption [16] In a custody dispute between a natural parent and a third party, there is a strong presumption in all cases that the natural parent should have- custody of his or her child. In re L.L., 745 N.E.2d at 230 (<HOLDING>). “[BJefore placing a child in the custody of a 
 Holding statements: (A) holding de facto custodian status does not remove the presumption in favor of natural parents obtaining or retaining custody of their children (B) recognizing parents fundamental liberty interest in the care custody and management of their children (C) holding that de facto custodians are still required to overcome the natural parent presumption in order to gain custody (D) holding that a de facto parents rights do not infringe on the fundamental liberty interests of the other legal parent in a family unit because de facto status can be achieved only through the active encouragement of the biological or adoptive parent by affirmatively establishing a family unit with the de facto parent and child or children that accompany the family (E) holding that natural parents have a fundamental liberty interest in the care custody and management of their children
Output (English): holding that natural parents have a fundamental liberty interest in the care custody and management of their children