Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): the form defendant signed, entitled “Declarations to Paramedical Examiner,” with the exception of (i) the title of the forms; (ii) the signature line differences depending upon whether an agent, paramedical examiner or medial examiner asked and recorded the data and (iii) the questions relating to height and weight, which were not included on the form that defendant signed . (Youngquist Aff. ¶ 3). In the instant matter, the paramedical examiner conducted a physical examination, including measuring defendant’s height and weight, and reported the results of the physical examination on a separate form. (Youngquist Aff. ¶ 6). Thus, every medical question on the form defendant signed, entitled “Declarations to Paramedic oup, Inc., 556 N.Y.S.2d 549, 553, 157 A.D.2d 293, 298 (1st Dep’t 1990) (<HOLDING>); Benefit Trust Life Insur. Co. v. Rowland, 486 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that the best way to harmonize a choice of law clause and an arbitration clause is to apply the substantive case law of the named state to the entire agreement including the arbitration clause (B) holding failure of insurer to file under sections of insurance law requiring readable and understandable policies would not by itself void the policy clause but rather carries its own penalties for nonfiling further such clause is void only if the substantive provisions of the clause are inconsistent with other statutes or regulations (C) holding that when an arbitration clause has provisions that defeat the remedial purpose of the statute  the arbitration clause is not enforceable and that the language insulating an employer from damages and equitable relief renders the clause unenforceable (D) holding residual clause of acca void for vagueness (E) holding an entire arbitration clause is void and arbitration cannot be compelled where contract contained unconscionable clause and has a nonseverability clause
Output (English): holding that when an arbitration clause has provisions that defeat the remedial purpose of the statute  the arbitration clause is not enforceable and that the language insulating an employer from damages and equitable relief renders the clause unenforceable