Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): Id. § 815.9(4). If the costs and fees are not paid within this time frame, the court is required to enter judgment against the person for any unpaid amounts. Id. § 815.9(9). This process takes place entirely in the context of the criminal case. Under this statutory scheme, as applied to an acquitted defendant, the “final judgment on behalf of the state” in the criminal proceeding is the cost judgment entered against the acquitted person in favor of the state. Therefore, under the definition of “prosecution” applicable to chapter 815, the criminal prosecution includes the pos-tacquittal proceedings. We conclude these statutory provisions evidence a legislative intent to extend a defendant’s right to counsel to these postacquittal proceedings. Cf. White, 201 F.3d at 745, 752-53 (<HOLDING>); State v. Jones, 92 Wash.App. 555, 964 P.2d 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that an issue not raised on direct appeal of sentence is barred by the law of the case from presentation in a subsequent appeal (B) holding that the granting of an application to file an appeal out of time is considered part of the direct appeal process under oklahoma law (C) holding claims must be raised on direct appeal or waived (D) holding that ineffective assistance of counsel claims should be brought in collateral proceedings not on direct appeal (E) holding that because ohio law required ineffectiveassistanceofcounsel claims be raised in an application to reopen the direct appeal of the criminal case such claims were part of the direct appeal entitling defendant to the assistance of counsel
Output (English): holding that the granting of an application to file an appeal out of time is considered part of the direct appeal process under oklahoma law