Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): 07 (E.D.Ky.2001) (finding temporary deprivation of Husband's property right to enjoy firearms during three-day, pre-hearing seizure period was outweighed by government's interest in protecting victim of domestic violence from further violence and potential death); see also Kellogg v. City of Gary, 562 N.E.2d 685, 693 (Ind.1990) (discussing due process implications of Second Amendment right to bear arms in conjunction with issuance of civil temporary injunction). 5 . We note that if the findings are temporary, a respondent should no longer suffer the consequences under the federal statute given a respondent would no longer be "subject” to the court order. 18 U.S.C.A. § 922(g)(8) (2000 & Supp.2007); cf. Weissenburger v. Iowa Dist. Court for Warren County, 740 N.W.2d 431, 436 (Iowa 2007) (<HOLDING>). 6 . In light of the problems highlighted by 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that husband was prohibited from possessing firearms pursuant to 18 usca  922g8 where he was subject to a continuing nocontact order with wife (B) holding that property held by husband and wife in tenancy by entirety is exempt from attachment or execution for the sole debts of husband (C) holding that alimony was justified where wife was homemaker with lesser job skills than husband wife had lesser earning capacity and husband was guilty of marital misconduct (D) holding a wife liable for necessary medical expenses incurred by her husband under the doctrine even though the wife did not sign as a guarantor and did not request that her husband be admitted nor anticipate that her husband would be admitted (E) holding that a reservation clause gave a life estate to a spouse pursuant to a deed reserving use of the property to both husband and wife for life even though the husband had no interest in the property
Output (English): holding that property held by husband and wife in tenancy by entirety is exempt from attachment or execution for the sole debts of husband