Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): traffic stop "significantly curtails the 'freedom of action’ of the driver and the passengers” alike); United States v. Valadez, 267 F.3d 395, 397-98 (5th Cir.2001). 11 . Terry, 392 U.S. at 21-22, 88 S.Ct. at 1880. 12 . Ford, 158 S.W.3d at 492. 13 . Id. at 492, 493-94. 14 . United States v. Sokolow, 490 U.S. 1, 7, 109 S.Ct. 1581, 1585, 104 L.Ed.2d 1 (1989). 15 . Terry, 392 U.S. at 19-20, 88 S.Ct. . Velasquez, 994 S.W.2d 676, 678 (Tex.Crim.App.1999). 48 . Kolender v. Lawson, 461 U.S. 352, 360 n. 9, 103 S.Ct. 1855, 1859 n. 9, 75 L.Ed.2d 903 (1983) (quoting Davis v. Mississippi, 394 U.S. 721, 727 n. 6, 89 S.Ct. 1394, 1397 n. 6, 22 L.Ed.2d 676 (1969)). 49 . 443 U.S. 47, 52-53, 99 S.Ct. 2637, 2641, 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979); see also Hull v. State, 613 S.W.2d 735, 740 (Tex.Crim.App.1981) (<HOLDING>). 50 .Brown, 443 U.S. at 52, 99 S.Ct. at 2641. 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that arrest immediately out side of defendants house violated fourth amendment (B) holding detention of passenger for warrant check violated fourth amendment absent reasonable suspicion (C) holding that arrest in backyard violated fourth amendment (D) holding defendants nervousness in part presented officer with reasonable articulable suspicion of criminal activity (E) holding arrest of individual for refusal to identify violated fourth amendment absent particularized and objective suspicion of criminal activity on his part
Output (English): holding that arrest in backyard violated fourth amendment