Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): opinion issued on April 6, 2005, and issue the following clarified opinion in its place. Maurice Harris appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm the order denying postconviction relief because he never appealed his resen-tence, and the holding in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), is not retroactive. Harris was charged with attempted first degree murder with a firearm (Count I) and armed robbery with a- firearm (Count II). He was 15 years old at the time that the alleged crimes were committed. A jury trial found him guilty as charged. On direct appeal, in Harris v. State, 674 So.2d 854 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996), this Court vacated the conviction on Count I under the authority of State v. Gray, 654 So.2d 552 (Fla.1995) (<HOLDING>), and remanded the case with instructions to 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that there is no crime of attempted felony murder in florida (B) holding that attempted felony murder was abolished (C) holding that the crime of attempted felony murder no longer existed in florida (D) holding that attempted felony murder is a logical impossibility (E) holding that the crime of attempted first degree felony murder does not exist
Output (English): holding that the crime of attempted felony murder no longer existed in florida