Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979) (emphasis in original). 3 . During the attack victim’s uncle and cousin, who had arrived on the scene, called 911. 4 ., On March 15, 2016, the State filed a multiple bill of information pursuant to La. R.S. 15:529.1, charging Defendant as a quadruple offender based on a 2009 guilty plea to unauthorized entry of an inhabited dwelling; a 2002 guilty plea to illegal possession of a stolen automobile worth over $500; and a 1996 guilty plea to i l be sentenced to imprisonment for the fourth or subsequent felony for a determinate term of not less than the longest prescribed for a first conviction but in no event less than twenty years and not more than his natural life,” , (emphasis added). See State v. Shaw, 2006-2467pp. 23-24 (La. 11/27/07), 969 So.2d 1233, 1247 (<HOLDING>). 8 . As Judge Jenkins recognizes in her 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that under the 1991 version of the habitual offender statute defendant could not receive habitual offender sentence for life felony (B) holding our habitual offender act does not limit enhancement to prior felony convictions within a certain time (C) holding that all sentences for convictions on same date for a single course of criminal conduct are subject to enhancement under the habitual offender law overruling state ex rel porter v butler 573 so2d 1106 la 1991 and state v sherer 411 so2d 1050 la 1982 (D) holding that it is permissible for a trial court to consider the same prior offenses for both enhancement of the instant offense and to establish habitual offender status (E) holding that predicate crimes for which defendant received probation and adjudication could be considered for purposes of habitual offender enhancement
Output (English): holding our habitual offender act does not limit enhancement to prior felony convictions within a certain time