Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): litigated and, on appeal, the Second District held that a sperm donor has no right to visitation and that any agreement granting visitation rights was unenforceable. The court explained: [T]he sperm donor is a nonparent, a statutory stranger to the children. Even though the parties entered into ... stipulations, purportedly to give visitation rights to this nonparent, we conclude that agreement is not enforceable. There are numerous Florida cases holding that nonparents are not entitled to visitation rights. See, e.g., O’Dell v. O’Dell, 629 So.2d 891, 891 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993)(reversing visitation for a divorced man and his stepson, noting that “[t]his court has repeatedly reversed orders giving visitation rights to nonparents”); Kazmierazak v. Query, 736 So.2d 106, 106 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)(<HOLDING>); Meeks v. Garner, 598 So.2d 261 (Fla. 1st DCA 
 Holding statements: (A) recognizing that a foster parent may attain the status of psychological parent when the relationship is not temporary in duration and exists with the consent and encouragement of a childs legal parent or guardian (B) holding that psychological parent was not entitled to custody or visitation (C) holding that without personal jurisdiction over one parent a court could still decide custody of a child living in the state but could not determine support and visitation (D) holding conclusory statements in visitation dispute were not adequate to support awarding visitation rights (E) holding that parent has custodial right to prevent visitation with nonparent
Output (English): holding conclusory statements in visitation dispute were not adequate to support awarding visitation rights