Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): above, Waters’ claims must be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) and Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). An appropriate Order shall issue. 1 . Sometime after the filing of his complaint. Waters was apparently transferred to Sussex I State Prison, a VDOC facility. This transfer moots his claims for declaratory and injunc-tive relief. See Williams v. Griffin, 952 F.2d 820, 823 (4th Cir.1991) (addressing the merits of a prisoner's claim for monetary damages despite transfer to a new facility). It does not moot his claim for monetary damages based on the failure to transfer and hence this aspect of the transfer claim is subject to § 1915A and Rule 12(b)(6) scrutiny. 2 . See Bolding v. Holshouser, 575 F.2d 461, 465 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 837, 99 S.Ct. 121, 58 L.Ed.2d 133, (1978) (<HOLDING>). 3 . See Mitchell v. Rice, 954 F.2d 187 (4th 
 Holding statements: (A) holding claim is not cognizable (B) holding that failure to provide adequate sanitary food service facilities establishes a cognizable claim (C) holding claim is cognizable (D) holding that insufficiency of evidence not cognizable in postconviction claim (E) holding that service is not avoided by service on a partys attorney as service on an attorney is ineffective unless he has been authorized to accept such service
Output (English): holding that insufficiency of evidence not cognizable in postconviction claim