Task: Text Completion
Input (English): 96 S.Ct. 893, 47 L.Ed.2d 18 (1976): [I]dentification of the specific dictates of due process generally requires consideration of three distinct factors: First, the private interest that will be affected by the official action; second, the risk of an erroneous deprivation of such interest through the procedures used, and the probable value, if any, of additional or substitute procedural safeguards; and finally, the Government’s interest, including the function involved and fiscal and administrative burdens that the additional or substitute procedural requirement would entail. Id. at 335, 96 S.Ct. 893. That is not to say that there are no guides whatever to striking that balance. There are. See, e.g., Nat’l Council of Resistance of Iran v. Dep't of State, 251 F.3d 192, 209 (D.C.Cir.2001) (<HOLDING>). However, as explained below, the provisions 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that organizations designated by the secretary of state as terrorist organizations must have the opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner and must have the opportunity to present at least in written form such evidence as those entities may be able to produce to rebut the administrative record or otherwise negate the proposition that they are foreign terrorist organizations (B) holding plaintiff must prove that he or she was deprived of  an opportunity  granted at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner for a hearing appropriate to the nature of the case (C) holding that due process requires at a minimum an opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner (D) holding that constitution requires  an opportunity  granted at a meaningful time and a meaningful manner  for a hearing appropriate to the nature of the case (E) holding that procedural due process requires adequate notice and a meaningful opportunity to be heard
Output (English): (A)