Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): Department Country Reports and other exhibits regarding country conditions in Senegal contained in the record; (3) the letter from a family friend introduced by Sene at his immigration hearing; and (4) a credibility determination regarding Sene’s testimony. The motion panel provisionally denied INS’ motion and ordered briefing to proceed on the merits. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1) to review final orders of removal. Factual determinations made by the BIA are reviewed to determine whether they are supported by substantial evidence. Senathirajah v. INS, 157 F.3d 210, 216 (3d Cir.1998). However, we must uphold the BIA’s findings of fact unless the evidence compels otherwise. See INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 n. 3, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992) (<HOLDING>). We summarily deny Sene’s request for relief 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that we will not reverse in the absence of prejudice (B) recognizing that appellate court may reverse trial courts judgment when it is based on an erroneous conclusion of law (C) holding that to reverse the bia we must find that the evidence not only supports that conclusion but compels it (D) holding in the absence of alj findings supported by specific weighing of the evidence we cannot assess whether relevant evidence adequately supports the aljs conclusion (E) holding that we lack jurisdiction to review a claim not brought before the bia even when the bia addresses it sua sponte
Output (English): holding that we lack jurisdiction to review a claim not brought before the bia even when the bia addresses it sua sponte