Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): 519 S.W.2d 955, 958 (Tex.Civ.App.-Texarkana [6th Dist.] 1975, writ dism’d). NCNB’s wrongful setoff in this case amounted to an act manifesting the bank’s clear repudiation of Perry Brothers’ rights to the company’s deposited money in the bank; this setoff action constitutes an act of conversion in this case. Perry Brothers has established by the preponderance of the evidence that NCNB converted approximately $1.3 million of Perry Brothers’ property between November 27-29, 1990, when the bank exercised unauthorized dominion and control over “readily identifiable” Perry Brothers funds being transferred through the “ACH” wire transfer, cash collection system. See generally e.g., Houston Nat’l Bank v. Biber, 613 S.W.2d 771, 774 (Tex.Civ.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1981, writ ref'd n.r.e.) (<HOLDING>). 2. As a tort, conversion allows damage awards 
 Holding statements: (A) holding a claim for money damages is an adequate remedy at law and so it does not provide a sufficient basis for injunctive relief notwithstanding the possibility that a money judgment will be uncollectible (B) holding that declaratory judgment requiring party to pay a specific sum of money is properly characterized as a money judgment (C) holding that action for lien seeks money damages because its goal is to seize or attach money in the hands of the government as compensation   (D) holding that exhaustion is required under the plra even if the plaintiff seeks only money damages and money damages are not available as relief (E) recognizing that an action will lie for conversion of money when its identification is possible and there is an obligation to deliver the specific money in question or otherwise particularly treat the specific money
Output (English): holding a claim for money damages is an adequate remedy at law and so it does not provide a sufficient basis for injunctive relief notwithstanding the possibility that a money judgment will be uncollectible