Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): CURIAM. The Court has determined that this appeal is premature as it was taken from a non-final order. T.H. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 736 So.2d 126 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (<HOLDING>). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed without 
 Holding statements: (A) holding a judgment that reserved the issue of child support pending the mothers taking an examination  to obtain her nursing license to be nonfinal (B) holding order was nonfinal where order reserved jurisdiction to determine integrallyrelated visitation and child support issues (C) holding that an appellate court may not exercise pendent appellate jurisdiction to review a nonfinal district court order where the merits of the nonfinal order are not inextricably intertwined with the properly appealed collateral order or where review of the former is not necessary to ensure meaningful review of the latter (D) holding that without personal jurisdiction over one parent a court could still decide custody of a child living in the state but could not determine support and visitation (E) holding order improperly denied relators right to visitation with his child
Output (English): holding that an appellate court may not exercise pendent appellate jurisdiction to review a nonfinal district court order where the merits of the nonfinal order are not inextricably intertwined with the properly appealed collateral order or where review of the former is not necessary to ensure meaningful review of the latter