Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): and the consistency analysis found in section 163.3177(10)(a). He focused upon whether the plan, as adopted by the Commissioners and when considered as a whole, is compatible with, furthers or takes action in the direction of realizing, the goals and policies of rule 9J-5.005(8) and section 163.3174 and the public participation ordinance referenced therein. We hold that the Department of Community Affairs did not abuse its discretion in approving this analysis or in concluding that the Town’s determination that its plan is in compliance is fairly debatable. In our view, the planning board members’ actions at the January 10, 1989 meeting demonstrate that body’s de facto recommendation of the plan to the Commissioners. Cf. Leon County v. Parker, 566 So.2d 1315, 1317 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990) (<HOLDING>) Given the planning board’s active role in the 
 Holding statements: (A) recognizing informal assumptions (B) holding that kentucky does not recognize any inherent right to local government (C) recognizing that informal discovery methods can support adequate appreciation of the merits (D) holding that state and local government agencies were not persons under the fca (E) recognizing that local government bodies often proceed in an informal freeform manner
Output (English): holding that state and local government agencies were not persons under the fca