Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): 1276 (4th Cir.1986)). If Meritage was neither aware nor on notice that the plaintiffs were working overtime, then no violation of the FLSA’s overtime provision has occurred. Id. Meritage does not claim to have paid any plaintiff for her unreported overtime. Therefore, if each plaintiff proves that Meritage knew she was working overtime hours, and establishes the amount and extent of her unpaid overtime by just and reasonable inference, she has satisfied her burden. i. Angela Carman Th s presented sufficient evidence to establish the amount and extent of her unpaid overtime hours. Her sworn testimony and accompanying evidence sufficiently detail when and how many additional hours she worked each month. See Prince v. MND Hospitality, Inc., 2009 WL 2170042, at *6 (S.D.Tex. July 20, 2009) (<HOLDING>); cf. Harvill, 433 F.3d at 441 (holding that 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that evidence was sufficiently reliable because there was corroboration (B) holding that words which expressly refer to adequate legal description provide nucleus of description that is legally sufficient for statute of frauds (C) holding that description was sufficiently detailed (D) holding that witness had an independent basis to support incourt identification where the description made prior to any pretrial identification was substantially an accurate description of the defendant (E) holding that where accessible literature sources clearly provided a description of the teachings at issue the written description requirement does not require their incorporation by reference
Output (English): holding that words which expressly refer to adequate legal description provide nucleus of description that is legally sufficient for statute of frauds