Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): date of the amendment. Jordan v. Dennison, 278 N.J.Super. 306, 311, 650 A.2d 1041 (App.Div.1995). Although the Legislature substantially modified the no-fault laws in 1988, and then again effective March 12, 1990, the provisions of the Fund Law, including N.J.S.A 39:6-70(n), were not changed. The Fund Law has remained constant since enactment and still requires that the threshold of N.J.S A 39:6A-8a be met if the injured party seeks recovery from the fund. Thus, after January 1, 1989, a person would not be entitled to recover noneconomic damages resulting from injury caused by an identified uninsured motorist from the Fund unless her injuries met the “verbal threshold” delineated in one of nine categories of N.J.S A 39:6A-8a. Cf. Rivera, supra, 285 N.J.Super. at 180, 666 A.2d 619 (<HOLDING>). Plaintiff contends that the failure to amend 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that racial discrimination is not a personal injury tort (B) holding that age discrimination is not a personal injury tort (C) holding that a negligence claim is not a personal injury tort claim (D) holding that sexual harassment is a personal injury tort (E) holding that the tort threshold requirement njsa 39670n is not applicable if the injury to a qualified claimant is caused by a hit and run motorist
Output (English): holding that age discrimination is not a personal injury tort