Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): people, and the many recent advances made by gays and lesbians toward achieving social acceptance and equality under the law, we cannot find that a right to same-sex marriage is so deeply rooted in the traditions, history, and conscience of the people of this State that it ranks as a fundamental right. When looking for the source of our rights under the New Jersey Constitution, we need not look beyond our borders. Nevertheless, we do take note that no jurisdiction, not even Massachusetts, has declared that there is a fundamental right to same-sex marriage under the federal or its own constitution. Having decided that there is no fundamental right to same-sex marriage does not end our inquiry. See WHS Realty Co. v. Town of Morristown, 323 N.J.Super. 553, 562-63, 733 A.2d 1206 (App.Div.) (<HOLDING>), certif. denied, 162 N.J. 489, 744 A.2d 1211 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that service of a statecourt summons and complaint after removal to federal court is valid service (B) holding that service is not avoided by service on a partys attorney as service on an attorney is ineffective unless he has been authorized to accept such service (C) holding that rule 4 displaced service provision in the admiralty act (D) holding that ricos nationwide service of process provision did not authorize service outside the united states (E) recognizing that although provision of municipal service is not fundamental right inequitable provision of that service is subject to equal protection analysis
Output (English): holding that ricos nationwide service of process provision did not authorize service outside the united states