Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): ¶ 522.1 l[6][d] ("[T]he definition refers to a VCR even though many debtors had replaced this item with a DVD player by the time the definition was enacted in 2005. Given the impracticality of an exclusive list of items in a statutory provision that will inevitably become obsolete if not amended, courts may feel compelled to expand the list to include reasonable substitutes for the listed items.”). 7 . The Illustrated Oxford English Dictionary 47 (1988); see also Webster’s New World Dictionary of the American Language 67 (2d coll, ed 1980) (defining “appliance” as "a device or machine for performing a specific task, esp. one that is worked mechanically or by electricity (stoves, irons, etc. are household appliances).”). 8 . See In re Wiford, 105 B.R. 992, 1002 (Bankr. N.D.Okla.1989) (<HOLDING>); In re Irwin, 232 B.R. 151, 153-54 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that a lawn mower seems to fit reasonably well within the common meaning of the terms household good and appliances  it is a large appliance but not all that different from eg a vacuum cleaner (B) holding that where only one interpretation of contractual terms is possible a court may decide the meaning of those terms as a matter of law (C) holding that a state is not a person within the meaning of  1983 (D) holding that the legislature intends different meanings when it uses different terms in a statute (E) holding that ambiguity exists if the meaning of contractual terms cannot be deciphered from reading the entire instrument or if the terms are reasonably susceptible to more than one interpretation
Output (English): holding that ambiguity exists if the meaning of contractual terms cannot be deciphered from reading the entire instrument or if the terms are reasonably susceptible to more than one interpretation