Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): retrieve E.P.C. Reynolds also testified that Father showed no remorse about leaving E.P.C. alone and appeared to worry more about possibly losing his job. Father’s act of leaving ten- month-old E.P.C. alone in the apartment endangered E.P.C.’s physical well-being. See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 161.001(1)(E); see also In re S.M.L., 171 S.W.3d 472, 477 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2005, no pet.) (stating that “a child is endangered when the environment or the parent’s course of conduct creates a potential for danger which the parent is aware of but disregards”). Moreover, the trial court heard additional conflicting evidence that Mother and Father had been seen in public without E.P.C. as many as eight other times. See In re H.R., 87 S.W.3d 691, 698-99 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2002, no pet.) (<HOLDING>). In addition to leaving E.P.C. unsupervised, 
 Holding statements: (A) holding evidence legally sufficient under sections d and e (B) holding evidence legally sufficient (C) holding evidence legally insufficient (D) holding the evidence sufficient to establish the defendants knowing possession of a firearm beyond a reasonable doubt when among other things the defendant admitted to a law enforcement officer that he had acquired the shotgun for his protection and that officers testimony went uncontradicted at trial (E) holding evidence legally sufficient and noting among other things that the appellant left the child in the care of a nineyearold cousin while she went out drinking
Output (English): holding the evidence sufficient to establish the defendants knowing possession of a firearm beyond a reasonable doubt when among other things the defendant admitted to a law enforcement officer that he had acquired the shotgun for his protection and that officers testimony went uncontradicted at trial