Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): human remains as “Native American” if the remains are “of, or relating to, a tribe, people, or culture that is indigenous to the United States.” 25 U.S.C. § 3001(9). The text of the relevant statutory clause is written in the present tense (“of, or relating to, a tribe, people, or culture that is indigenous”). Thus the statute unambiguously requires that human remains bear some relationship to a presently existing tribe, people, or culture to be considered Native American. It is axiomatic that, in construing a statute, courts generally give words not defined in a statute their “ordinary or natural meaning.” United States v. Alvarez-Sanchez, 511 U.S. 350, 357, 114 S.Ct. 1599, 128 L.Ed.2d 319 (1994); see also Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 420, 431, 120 S.Ct. 1479, 146 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000) (<HOLDING>) (internal quotation marks omitted). In the 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that statutory words must be given their ordinary contemporary meaning (B) recognizing that undefined words in a statute ordinarily should be interpreted as taking their ordinary contemporary common meaning (C) holding that we must give the words in statutes their plain and ordinary meaning (D) holding that  unless otherwise defined words will be interpreted as taking their ordinary contemporary common meaning  at the time congress enacted a statute and reviewing dictionaries from the era of the statutes enactment to assist in determining its meaning citation omitted (E) holding that courts give the words of a statute their ordinary contemporary common meaning absent an indication congress intended them to bear some different import
Output (English): holding that we must give the words in statutes their plain and ordinary meaning