Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): concerning, the merit system principles contained in section 2301.” 5 U.S.C. § 2302(b)(ll). For most federal employees, section 2302(b)(ll) would give the OSC jurisdiction over complaints concerning specified personnel actions taken in violation of the rules and/or regulations promulgated under the CSRA. As members of the excepted service, however, FBI employees may not employ the remedial scheme available to most other federal employees. That Congress deliberately excluded FBI employees from the provisions establishing administrative and judicial review for personnel actions involving violations of CSRA implementing regulations suggests that Congress meant to preclude judicial review for such actions. See United States v. Fausto, 484 U.S. 439, 108 S.Ct. 668, 98 L.Ed.2d 830 (1988) (<HOLDING>); see also Borrell v. United States Int’l 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that a procedural default in exhausting administrative remedies bars relief in federal court (B) holding that plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies by failing to include issue in case brief (C) holding that defendant had adequate alternatives in judicial and administrative remedies to the course he took (D) holding that the csra in failing to provide explicitly for administrative or judicial remedies for certain decisions affecting nonpreference excepted service employees implicitly bars judicial remedies under 5 usc  5596 back pay act (E) holding that the remedies are exclusive
Output (English): holding that defendant had adequate alternatives in judicial and administrative remedies to the course he took