Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): standard, but simply noted that the impact on Middletown’s contractual obligations was sufficient adverse effect on a legal interest for purposes of satisfying one of the R.C. 707.09 injunction requirements. McGee also emphasized Ohio’s policy of encouraging annexation and the “heavy burden” on parties seeking an injunction. 39 Ohio St.3d at 285, 530 N.E.2d at 903. And notably, the court distinguished between pleading “standing” under R.C. 709.07(A) and the legal requirements which must be satisfied for an injunction under R.C. 709.07(D). 39 Ohio St.3d at 286, 530 N.E.2d at 904, fn. 1. In a later decision, the Ohio Supreme Court again stressed the legislature’s desire to promote annexation. See In re Petition to Annex 320 Acres to S. Lebanon, 64 Ohio St.3d 585, 596, 597 N.E.2d 463, 470 (<HOLDING>). Moreover, in a case decided the same day, the 
 Holding statements: (A) holding the flsa does not provide the exclusive remedy for violations of its mandates (B) holding that title vii provides the exclusive judicial remedy for claims of discrimination in federal employment (C) holding that the remedies are exclusive (D) holding that rc 70907 is the exclusive remedy for challenging annexation approval (E) holding that massachusetts provides an adequate remedy for challenging a real estate tax assessment
Output (English): holding that title vii provides the exclusive judicial remedy for claims of discrimination in federal employment