Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): efforts as well as this court’s jurisdiction. Based on the foregoing, the court is not persuaded that Bank of America has satisfied the requirements for a stay pending appeal. SO ORDERED. 1 . The court herein incorporates by reference the findings and reasoning set forth in the Stay Order. See In re Brier Creek Corp. Ctr. Assocs. Ltd. P’ship, 2013 WL 144082, 2013 Bankr.LEXIS 143 (Bankr.E.D.N.C. Jan. 14, 2013). 2 . See also Piccinin, 788 F.2d at 1002-03 (“The court will have ample power [under Section 105] to enjoin actions excepted from the automatic stay which might interfere in the rehabilitative process whether in a liquidation or in a reorganization case.”); Apollo Molded Prods., Inc. v. Kleinman (In re Apollo Molded Prods., Inc.), 83 B.R. 189, 191 (Bankr.D.Mass.1988) (<HOLDING>) (citing Piccinin); Lahman Mfg. Co. v. First 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that bankruptcy court may enjoin federal administrative proceedings when they threaten the debtors estate (B) holding a bankruptcy court is empowered to reopen a bankruptcy case on its own motion under 11 usc  105a (C) holding debtors are entitled to establish and recover their compensatory damages under 11 usc  105a for violations of the discharge injunction (D) holding bankruptcy court had jurisdiction to issue injunction of state court litigation against debtors principal stating this power under 11 usc  105a  includes the authority to enjoin litigants from pursuing actions in other courts that threaten the integrity of the debtors estate (E) holding that the definition of debtors principal residence in 11 usc  10113aa protects holder of secured claim in a mobile home that is debtors principal residence from modification under 11 usc  1322b
Output (English): holding that bankruptcy court may enjoin federal administrative proceedings when they threaten the debtors estate