Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): omitted) ]. Thus, the Debtor is collaterally estopped from arguing that the Probate Judgment is dischargeable because it does not give rise to a right of recoupment. Attorney’s Fees The Trust Plaintiffs also argue that the obligations represented by the Fee Judgment and the Appellate Fee Judgment are nondischargeable. Attorney’s fees and costs constitute a debt under 11 U.S.C. § 523 when they “result from” the debtor’s conduct underlying the debt. Cohen v. de la Cruz, 523 U.S. 213, 118 S.Ct. 1212, 140 L.Ed.2d 341 (1998). Therefore, when a debt is nondischargeable pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a), the attorney’s fees and costs associated with that debt are likewise nondischargeable. See, e.g., K & K Ins. Group, Inc. v. Houston (In re Houston), 305 B.R. 111, 116 (Bankr.M.D.Fla.2003) (<HOLDING>); USAA Cas. Ins. Co. v. Auffant (In re 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that when a state court judgment was found not to be dischargeable under 11 usc  523a6 the associated attorneys fees were also not dischargeable (B) holding that state university violated 11 usc  362 and 525 by withholding debtors transcript where debt was dischargeable (C) holding  525 applies only where debt dischargeable (D) holding that if both willful and malicious are not met the debt is dischargeable (E) holding that fees should not be awarded where plaintiff also argued a claim under  523a6
Output (English): holding that state university violated 11 usc  362 and 525 by withholding debtors transcript where debt was dischargeable