Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): claimant’s claim for hearing aids is barred by the statute of limitations. Arkansas Code Annotated § ll-9-702(a)(l) (1987)', provides, “A claim for compensation for disability on account of injury, other than an occupational disease and occupational infection, shall be barred unless filed with the Commission within two (2) years from the date of injury.” The Commission determined that Rollon’s 1.9% permanent hearing impairment had developed and become apparent to Rollon more than two years prior to the date he filed his claim for benefits on March 3, 1993, and was therefore barred by the statute of limitations, a finding not appealed to this court. However, the Commission recognized that although Rollon’s permanent impairment remained the same under the AMA Guides, he W.2d 193 (1987) (<HOLDING>). Likewise, in the present case, we hold that 
 Holding statements: (A) holding the law presumes that a cause lies outside the limited jurisdiction of the federal courts and the burden of establishing the contrary rests upon the party asserting jurisdiction (B) holding that appellant bears burden of establishing jurisdiction by a preponderance of the evidence (C) holding that it is the claimants burden to show that the injury was the result of an accident that not only arose in the course of the employment but that it also grew out of or resulted from the employment (D) holding that the liberal construction of workers compensation laws did not relieve a claimant of the burden of showing a causal relation between his injury and the employment (E) holding that the burden rests upon the party seeking benefits to prove the injury sustained was the result of an accident arising out of and in the course of employment and the rule of liberal construction is not a substitute for the claimants burden of establishing his claim by a preponderance of the evidence
Output (English): holding the law presumes that a cause lies outside the limited jurisdiction of the federal courts and the burden of establishing the contrary rests upon the party asserting jurisdiction