Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): 1, 6 (1st Cir. BAP 2006) (discussing shifting burdens); Mountain Dairies, Inc., 372 B.R. at 633 (“the petitioning creditor must first establish a prima facie case that no bona fide dispute exists”); In re Mylotte, David & Fitzpatrick, Bky. No. 07-11861, 2007 WL 2033812, at *6 (Bankr. E.D.Pa. Jul. 12, 2007) (same); In re Graber, 319 B.R. 374, 377 (Bankr.E.D.Pa.2004) (“The initial burden lies with the petitioner to establish a prima facie case that there is no bona fide dispute.”). The Petitioning Creditor alleges that her Claim is derived from the Proposed Debtor’s failure to repay a loan in the amount of $850,000. To provide prima facie evidence of her Claim, the Petitioning Creditor must provide evidence of the alleged loan. In re VitaminSpice, 472 B.R. 282, 291 (Bankr.E.D.Pa.2012) (<HOLDING>); In re Taub, 439 B.R. 261, 274-75 
 Holding statements: (A) recognizing that loan documents introduced by petitioning creditors were sufficient to establish prima facie validity of claims (B) recognizing confusion caused by prima facie language (C) holding to establish a prima facie case of racial discrimination a plaintiff must show he 1 (D) holding that close temporal proximity is sufficient to establish a prima facie case of retaliation (E) holding that numbers alone are not sufficient to establish or negate a prima facie ease
Output (English): holding that close temporal proximity is sufficient to establish a prima facie case of retaliation