Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): 106 L.Ed.2d 472 (1989); Freedom, from, Religion Found., Inc. v. City of Marshfield, 203 F.3d 487, 493 (7th Cir.2000). Here, the program had a religious component only to the extent that individual students selected religious material to present. Rogers submitted no evidence to suggest that school personnel encouraged the students to choose religious as opposed to secular presentations or that they otherwise gave the impression of endorsing religion. Nor did he support his inference that the program’s theme was meant to solicit performances with religious content. The mere fact that some religious material was presented does not establish that the “principal or primary effect” of the program was to advance religion. See Torricellas v. Poole, 954 F.Supp. 1405, 1411-12 (C.D.Cal.1997) (<HOLDING>), aff'd, No. 97-55369, 1998 WL 133602 (9th Cir. 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that a party held in prisons visiting room did not have the effect of advancing religion where it was dubbed a christmas party and some songs contained religious lyrics (B) holding that religious exercise is any exercise of religion whether or not compelled by or central to a system of religious belief and that the use building or conversion of real property for the purpose of religious exercise shall be considered  religious exercise (C) holding that in a situation where the police have probable cause to arrest one party and reasonably mistake a second party for that first party the arrest of the second party is still a valid arrest (D) holding that an arbitration agreement enforceable against party who signed the agreement even where the other party did not sign it because generally it is enough that the party against whom the contract is sought to be enforced signs it (E) recognizing a religious institutions right to free exercise of religion
Output (English): recognizing a religious institutions right to free exercise of religion