Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): inviolate, subject to such modifications as may be authorized by this Constitution.”) 12 . See Peoples Natural Gas Co. v. City of Hartley, 497 N.W.2d 874, 876 (Iowa 1993) (addressing interplay between state constitutional provision on the taking of private property and the state rules of civil procedure and concluding that similarly-worded waiver provision in civil rules applied when appellant failed to file a timely jury demand and did not establish good cause for the failure). 13 . Empire Metal Corp. v. Wohlwender, 445 S.W.2d 685, 689 (Ky.1969) ("The right to a jury trial is waived unless it is demanded within 10 days after service of the last pleading directed to an issue triable by jury. CR 38.02, 38.04.”); see Ohio River Pipeline Corp. v. Landrum, 580 S.W.2d 713, 717 (Ky.App.1979) (<HOLDING>). 14 . Perry v. Williamson, 824 S.W.2d 869, 871 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that district court could not decide after jury returned verdict to treat jury verdict as advisory on issue not triable of right by jury but which was tried by consent of parties to nonadvisory jury (B) recognizing that parties had right to trial by jury in trespass action but holding that parties waived that right under cr 3804 by not filing a demand for a jury trial (C) recognizing the right to waive a jury trial (D) holding defendant to a preference action has a right to a jury trial pursuant to the seventh amendment of the united states constitution but that right can be waived by filing a claim in the bankruptcy proceedings (E) holding that a demand for a trial by jury is inconsistent with an intent to proceed in admiralty
Output (English): holding that district court could not decide after jury returned verdict to treat jury verdict as advisory on issue not triable of right by jury but which was tried by consent of parties to nonadvisory jury