Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): process, i.e., Microsoft critically failed to disclose its knowledge that certain versions of MS Word used in the Student Media contained the '449 patent. But the defendants’ only allegation about “inaccurate information” is that: “Based on the Texas judgment and findings the applications submitted by Microsoft to the Registrar of Copyrights contained knowingly false information. Therefore, Microsoft’s claims related to Microsoft Word and Microsoft Office in this action are barred.” Defs.’ Mot. Sum. Judgment, p. 4 ECF No. 158-1. This allegation of “inaccurate information” is insufficient to trigger the Court’s obligation to seek advice from the Register of Copyrights under § 411(b)(2). Cf Olem Shoe Corp. v. Washington Shoe Co., 2010 WL 3505100 at *2 (S.D.Fla., Sept. 03, 2010) (<HOLDING>). It has already been decided in this case that 
 Holding statements: (A) recognizing that issue exhaustion requirement and requirement exhaustion of remedies are different (B) holding that evidence of other allegations of torture was inadmissible in part because it was not similar to the allegations made by defendant (C) holding a pleading will not be sufficient to state a claim under the civil rights act if the allegations are mere conclusions (D) holding that allegations of inaccurate information are sufficient to trigger advisement requirement (E) holding that clearly dishonest conduct is sufficient to trigger investigation and ultimately justify a decision to remove a special agent
Output (English): holding that evidence of other allegations of torture was inadmissible in part because it was not similar to the allegations made by defendant