Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): Judge. The State challenges the trial court’s order dismissing an information against Larry Daniel Jones on the basis of double jeopardy. Because the Florida charge is not barred under the dual sovereign exception to double jeopardy, we reverse. Jones was charged with interference with child cust L.Ed.2d 641 (1985). Jones argues that Booth is inapplicable because it involved a federal-state context instead of a state-to-state situation. We find no basis for this distinction. See State v. McNab, 642 So.2d 41 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) (<HOLDING>). As Jones notes in his brief, a number of 
 Holding statements: (A) holding the same for malicious prosecution (B) holding that malicious prosecution claim accrues when underlying prosecution is terminated (C) holding that a judgment in a criminal prosecution for dwi did not bar a subsequent civil proceeding founded on the same facts (D) holding that states nonproseeution agreement did not bar subsequent federal prosecution (E) holding that foreign states prosecution did not bar subsequent florida prosecution for same conduct
Output (English): holding that states nonproseeution agreement did not bar subsequent federal prosecution