Task: Wrong Candidate Generation
Input (English): limit on their civil liability for noneconomic damages is inclusive of prejudgment interest on past noneconomic damages. As authority for their position, Appellees cite section 74.002 of the civil practice and remedies code and Molinet v. Kimbrell, 356 S.W.3d 407 (Tex.2011). Section 74.002 states that, and Molinet stands for the proposition that, in the event of a conflict between a provision of chapter 74 of the civil practice and remedies code and any other statute, rule of procedure, or rule of evidence, chapter 74 trumps. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem.Code Ann. § 74.002(a) (“In the event of a conflict between this chapter and another law, including a rule of procedure or evidence, or court rule, this chapter controls to the extent of the conflict.”); Molinet, 356 S.W.3d at 412-14 (<HOLDING>). Appellees claim that section 74.301’s 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that section 311034 does not make section 890041 jurisdictional (B) holding that both section 122 and rule 10b5 claims are timebarred by section 13 (C) holding that section 4a12 is a broadly applicable section of the guidelines (D) recognizing that rights under article i section 11 are subject to reasonable limitations (E) holding that the limitations provisions of section 74251a and section 33004e conflict and that section 74251a prevails
Output (English): holding that both section 122 and rule 10b5 claims are timebarred by section 13