Task: Sentiment Analysis
Input (English): morally repugnant . For 54 years there was no seperation fence or 'apartheid wall' built by Israel to stop the human assaults of suicide bombers.  But this is the cover of this book and points to what is really going on here. The argument is simple, had Zionism not existed there would be no Arab-Israeli conflict.  Had Israel created a Palestinian state, that he Jordanians refused to from 1948-1967, there would have been peace.  The entire onus for any conflict in the middle east rests with Israel.    This is an interesting argument. Israel is unique in being one of the few states created by an ideology, rather than an ideology rising out of a nation(rather Zionism rose out of the Jewish nation, but not in its present borders).  However it is not the only example.  The Risorgimento in Italy is responsible for odern Italy and in a number of other pleace latent ideologies have done the same, creating nations out of loose federations.  After all modern Moldova has little historical merit and neither does Kosovo.  for that matter most of the borders of the Arab states also arise out of modern ideology, especially the borders of modern Turkey.    Only apparently in Israel is this a problem.  The reason is remarkably simple, only in Israel did the creation of the new state result in 50 yeas of warfare.  Other 'old' conflicts like that over Kashmir are likely a result of the same.  But we do not readily argue that the existence of India is responsible for the Kashmir conflict.     It would be hard to imagine the title of an book about another nation being 'the case against ..' for instance 'the case against Germany'.  Therein lis the illogic of this book.  A case cannot be made against the existence of a state.  There can be no 'case against Japan'.      Even if all the arguments are correct, the solution, the disappearence of Israel as a state, is not only genocidal in its intentions but illogical in its premise.    Seth J. Frantzan
Output (English): NEG