Task: Sentiment Analysis
Input (English): The STRONG should PROTECT the WEAK--or  slaying the "judicial/bureaucratic" Goliaths! . Paul Newman is great as a despairing, alcoholic "David", once second in his law class, once part of a prestigious law firm, once married...till he dared to stand up to his dishonest law firm owner/and father-in-law who wanted to fix a jury.    The above is past history...just mentioned in the film.    It is some years after, and alcoholic Newman, with only 4 cases in the last few years,   ...has an epiphany...where his youthful religious and ethical training reawakens  as he gets the picture, so to speak, of a woman treated unjustly, whom he can help.    He forgets himself and his troubles, and the people who have pushed him around,     ...and starts fighting for the brain damaged young woman...against the hospital and doctors who damaged her. He will later awaken the conscience (as the movie hints) of one of the "Goliaths" he goes up against.     However, there are pitfalls... as opposing lawyer Concannon is not above using any trick---or person...to destroy the case.     Paul Newman's epiphany scene (which I won't describe further to spoil it for you, but which is clearly recognizable) is quite moving.        His Goliaths include:  The biased, hostile Judge, the "Prince of Darkness" superlawyer Concannon (played well by James Mason, always good at suave villians), the doctors and **most** of the attending support staff who attended the unfortunate Deborah Ann Kaye,   ...and the somewhat hesitant Bishop Brophy, head of St. Catherine's, the hospital where Mrs. Kaye lost her baby and suffered massive brain damage.     Set in Boston, a largely Catholic city (I am told) we here have nominal Catholics pitted against those of their denomination who take the Christian "Good Samaritan" story seriously.      My family caution:  There are some cuss words and a brief suggestion of a bedroom scene.       The Verdict implies the barely seen 12 who also are key players...the jury, who must deliver the verdict.      Will they go with the letter of the law?  Or---its spirit? (If you are familiar with this phrase from the Christian faith, you have the answer...)    (Hint of spoiler below)      My wish is that brain injured Terri Schiavo had had a jury   who could see the spirit of the law!      Instead we had lots of judges fighting turf wars against a Congress that dared   (how DARE they question the unquestionable judges seemed to be the attitude)    to merely ask for a second look at the whole case.  Meanwhile, Terri slowly starved to death...Shame on us! Shades of Nazi Eugenics!!!
Output (English): POS