Task: Question Answering
Input (English): Context: To compare single- with double-layer closure of the uterus for the risk of uterine rupture in women attempting vaginal birth after one prior caesarean delivery.', 'Cohort study.', 'Sweden.', 'From a total of 19\xa0604 nulliparous women delivered by caesarean section in the years 2001-2007, 7683 women attempting vaginal birth in their second delivery were analysed.', 'Data from population-based registers were linked to hospital-based registers that held data from maternity and delivery records. Logistic regression was used to estimate the risk of uterine rupture after single- or double-layer closure of the uterus. Results are presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).', 'Uterine rupture.', 'Uterine rupture during labour occurred in 103 (1.3%) women. There was no increased risk of uterine rupture when single- was compared with double-layer closure of the uterus (OR\xa01.17; 95% CI 0.78-1.76). Maternal factors associated with uterine rupture were: age ≥35\xa0years and height ≤160\xa0cm. Factors from the first delivery associated with uterine rupture in a subsequent delivery were: infection and giving birth to an infant large for gestational age. Risk factors from the second delivery were induction of labour, use of epidural analgesia, and a birthweight of ≥4500\xa0g.\Question: Is the risk of uterine rupture increased with single- compared with double-layer closure : a Swedish cohort study?
Output (English): There was no significant difference in the rate of uterine rupture when single-layer closure was compared with double -layer closure of the uterus.