Task: Sentiment Analysis
Input (English): one can not observe a star trek movie and expect to see serious science fiction .
the purpose of star trek is to provide flashy , innocent fun .
sometimes the stories are compelling .
sometimes they 're not .
but , with the exception of the first film in the series ( which provides little more than endless shots of amazed faces ) , i 've never been bored by any of the enterprise 's numerous missions .
star trek : insurrection is no exception .
the film has gotten some negative reviews ( a friend of mine actually thinks it 's the worst in the series ) , but i 'm not really sure why .
it 's an exciting , often hilarious movie that engaged me and left me ready for the next star trek film .
some say it 's a bit too light , and more of a long episode than a film .
others say the special effects are cheesy and that it 's boring .
i simply enjoyed the film .
insurrection , which is the second film to feature strictly the next generation cast , introduces us to a race of people called the ba'ku ; the ba'ku are very old ( most of them are about three hundred years old ) , but they actually appear younger with age due to strange radiation in the rings of their planet .
of course , these peaceful people ca n't horde this fountain of youth all for themselves ?
leave it up to their archenemies , the son'a , led by ru'afo ( f . murray abraham ) , to mess everything up .
the son'a , who are horribly disfigured and rely on daily reconstructive surgery to be aesthetically acceptable , strike a deal with the federation to move the ba'ku elsewhere and exploit the secret to keep their race from dying .
that 's when captain picard ( patrick stewart ) steps in : he realizes that moving the ba'ku would kill them
( it also helps that he falls in love with a ba'ku woman ( donna murphy ) ) .
so , with his trusty crew , picard defies the federation to keep the ba'ku in their natural habitat .
when dealing with a series with as much history as this , it 's not entirely necessary to re - introduce your characters with each episode .
this is why i believe non - fans have a hard time getting into star trek ; in order to enjoy it , one has to understand how to approach it .
insurrection , however
, does a surprisingly good job of us new aspects of the characters .
stewart is bold as always , a magnetic screen presence and perfectly capable of holding an entire film together .
jonathan frakes , who also directed , is funny as commander riker ; a subplot with data ( brent spiner ) discovering his lost childhood is fairly interesting ; and abraham makes a perfect star trek villain , overacting like crazy .
frakes showed similar aptitude for direction in first contact ; insurrection is an exciting film , with some really attractive special effects and a lot of good action .
this is apparently the first star trek film to utilize computer animation , and the result is very pleasing to the eye
: particularly in the climactic scenes , in which the son'a employ a giant space ship to suck up the rings of the ba'ku planet , the special effects have a clean , impressively sharp look .
if i have any complaint about the film , it 's that it tries to take a moral stance when it 's not very appropriate to do so .
i do n't think it 's that big of a deal that the federation wanted to move 600 ba'ku in order to save the lives of thousands .
better yet , why could n't they have co - existed ?
insurrection feels a little to light to spring these kinds of big moral questions on the audience .
with it 's inherent camp factor , the star trek series does n't seem well - equipped to deal with issues like this .
i prefer to just enjoy the spectacle .
Output (English): P