Task: Story Composition
Input (English): Fact1: serial killer commits number of brutal mutilation-slayings in to drink blood as result of paranoid delusions, Fact2: Most of film revolves around trial, Fact3: defendant is not guilty by reason of insanity, Fact4: Fraser 's internal debate about capital punishment is rendered academic, Fact5: Reece In ending of is sent to state mental hospital revised version
Output (English): Charles Reece is a serial killer who commits a number of brutal mutilationslayings in order to drink blood as a result of paranoid delusions. Reece is soon captured. Most of the film revolves around the trial and the prosecutors attempts to have Reece found sane and given the death penalty. Defense lawyers, meanwhile, argue that the defendant is not guilty by reason of insanity. The prosecutor, Anthony Fraser, was previously against capital punishment, but he seeks such a penalty in the face of Reeces brutal crimes after meeting one victims grieving family. In the end, Reece is found sane and given the death penalty, but Frasers internal debate about capital punishment is rendered academic when Reece is found to be insane by a scanning of his brain for mental illness. In the ending of the original version of the film, Reece is found dead in his cell, having overdosed himself on antipsychotics he had been stockpiling. In the ending of the revised version, Reece is sent to a state mental hospital, and in a chilling coda, he sends a letter to a person whose wife and child he has killed, asking the man to come and visit him. A final title card reveals that Reece is scheduled for a parole hearing in six months.