Task: Toxic Language Detection
Input (English): Comment: The article says NOTHING about a right of way. And WTF is your point, anyway? A landowner owns the land under a right of way, it only has easement for certain purposes such as utilities and road maintenance. It was half in the guys yard, doesn't matter if it was in the road right-of-way or a utility right-of-way. Makes no difference, unless the land owner was infringing on the use of the right of way for its legitimate purposes. Now you read the article again and get back to me, because you're really pushing reason.
Output (English): Non-identity-attack