Task: Question Generation
Input (English): The word intrusion test is expensive to apply since it requires manual evaluations by human observers separately for each embedding dimension. Furthermore, the word intrusion test does not quantify the interpretability levels of the embedding dimensions, instead it yields a binary decision as to whether a dimension is interpretable or not. However, using continuous values is more adequate than making binary evaluations since interpretability levels may vary gradually across dimensions.
Output (English): What advantages does their proposed method of quantifying interpretability have over the human-in-the-loop evaluation they compare to?