Sulak2020/github-issues-multirepo-datasets-Sulakshana huggingface dataset:
Title: The memory-disk mapping failure issue of the map function（resolved, but there are some suggestions.）
State: closed

### Describe the bug

## bug
When the map function processes a large dataset, it temporarily stores the data in a cache file on the disk. After the data is stored, the memory occupied by it is released. Therefore, when using the map function to process a large-scale dataset, only a dataset space of the size of `writer_batch_size` will be occupied in memory.

However, I found that the map function does not actually reduce memory usage when I used it. At first, I thought there was a bug in the program, causing a memory leak—meaning the memory was not released after the data was stored in the cache. But later, I used a Linux command to check for recently modified files during program execution and found that no new files were created or modified. This indicates that the program did not store the dataset in the disk cache.
## bug solved
After modifying the parameters of the map function multiple times, I discovered the `cache_file_name` parameter. By changing it, the cache file can be stored in the specified directory. After making this change, I noticed that the cache file appeared. Initially, I found this quite incredible, but then I wondered if the cache file might have failed to be stored in a certain folder. This could be related to the fact that I don't have root privileges.

So, I delved into the source code of the map function to find out where the cache file would be stored by default. Eventually, I found the function `def _get_cache_file_path(self, fingerprint):`, which automatically generates the storage path for the cache file. The output was as follows: `/tmp/hf_datasets-j5qco9ug/cache-f2830487643b9cc2.arrow`. My hypothesis was confirmed: the lack of root privileges indeed prevented the cache file from being stored, which in turn prevented the release of memory. Therefore, changing the storage location to a folder where I have write access resolved the issue.

### Steps to reproduce the bug

my code
`train_data = train_data.map(process_fun, remove_columns=['image_name', 'question_type', 'concern', 'question', 'candidate_answers', 'answer'])`

### Expected behavior

Although my bug has been resolved, it still took me nearly a week to search for relevant information and debug the program. However, if a warning or error message about insufficient cache file write permissions could be provided during program execution, I might have been able to identify the cause more quickly. Therefore, I hope this aspect can be improved. I am documenting this bug here so that friends who encounter similar issues can solve their problems in a timely manner.

### Environment info

python: 3.10.15
datasets: 3.5.0
Title: support pyarrow 20
State: closed

fix

```
TypeError: ArrayExtensionArray.to_pylist() got an unexpected keyword argument 'maps_as_pydicts'
```

Comments: The docs for this PR live [here](https://moon-ci-docs.huggingface.co/docs/datasets/pr_7540). All of your documentation changes will be reflected on that endpoint. The docs are available until 30 days after the last update.
Title: Fix IterableDataset state_dict shard_example_idx counting
State: closed

# Fix IterableDataset's state_dict shard_example_idx reporting

## Description

This PR fixes issue #7475 where the `shard_example_idx` value in `IterableDataset`'s `state_dict()` always equals the number of samples in a shard, even if only a few examples have been consumed.

The issue is in the `_iter_arrow` method of the `ArrowExamplesIterable` class where it updates the `shard_example_idx` state by the full length of the batch (`len(pa_table)`) even when we're only partway through processing the examples. 

## Changes

Modified the `_iter_arrow` method of `ArrowExamplesIterable` to:
1. Track the actual number of examples processed
2. Only increment the `shard_example_idx` by the number of examples actually yielded
3. Handle partial batches correctly

## How to Test

I've included a simple test case that demonstrates the fix:

```python
from datasets import Dataset

# Create a test dataset
ds = Dataset.from_dict({"a": range(6)}).to_iterable_dataset(num_shards=1)

# Iterate through part of the dataset
for idx, example in enumerate(ds):
    print(example)
    if idx == 2:  # Stop after 3 examples (0, 1, 2)
        state_dict = ds.state_dict()
        print("Checkpoint state_dict:", state_dict)
        break

# Before the fix, the output would show shard_example_idx: 6
# After the fix, it shows shard_example_idx: 3, correctly reflecting the 3 processed examples
```

## Implementation Details

1. Added logic to track the number of examples actually seen in the current shard
2. Modified the state update to only count examples actually yielded
3. Improved handling of partial batches and skipped examples

This fix ensures that checkpointing and resuming works correctly with exactly the expected number of examples, rather than skipping ahead to the end of the batch.

Comments: The docs for this PR live [here](https://moon-ci-docs.huggingface.co/docs/datasets/pr_7539). All of your documentation changes will be reflected on that endpoint. The docs are available until 30 days after the last update.Hi ! FYI I made a PR to fix https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/issues/7538 and it also fixed https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/issues/7475, so if I'm not mistaken this PR is not needed anymore
Title: `IterableDataset` drops samples when resuming from a checkpoint
State: closed
Labels: name: bug
description: Something isn't working

When resuming from a checkpoint, `IterableDataset` will drop samples if `num_shards % world_size == 0` and the underlying example supports `iter_arrow` and needs to be formatted. 

In that case, the `FormattedExamplesIterable` fetches a batch of samples from the child iterable's `iter_arrow` and yields them one by one (after formatting). However, the child increments the `shard_example_idx` counter (in its `iter_arrow`) before returning the batch for the whole batch size, which leads to a portion of samples being skipped if the iteration (of the parent iterable) is stopped mid-batch. 

Perhaps one way to avoid this would be by signalling the child iterable which samples (within the chunk) are processed by the parent and which are not, so that it can adjust the `shard_example_idx` counter accordingly. This would also mean the chunk needs to be sliced when resuming, but this is straightforward to implement.

The following is a minimal reproducer of the bug:
```python
from datasets import Dataset
from datasets.distributed import split_dataset_by_node

ds = Dataset.from_dict({"n": list(range(24))})
ds = ds.to_iterable_dataset(num_shards=4)

world_size = 4
rank = 0    
ds_rank = split_dataset_by_node(ds, rank, world_size)

it = iter(ds_rank)
examples = []
for idx, example in enumerate(it):
    examples.append(example)
    if idx == 2:
        state_dict = ds_rank.state_dict()
        break

ds_rank.load_state_dict(state_dict)
it_resumed = iter(ds_rank)
examples_resumed = examples[:]

for example in it:
    examples.append(example)

for example in it_resumed:
    examples_resumed.append(example)

print("ORIGINAL ITER EXAMPLES:", examples)
print("RESUMED ITER EXAMPLES:", examples_resumed)
```

Comments: Thanks for reporting ! I fixed the issue using RebatchedArrowExamplesIterable before the formatted iterable
Title: `datasets.map(..., num_proc=4)` multi-processing fails
State: open

The following code fails in python 3.11+ 

```python
tokenized_datasets = datasets.map(tokenize_function, batched=True, num_proc=4, remove_columns=["text"])  
```
Error log:
```bash
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.12/dist-packages/multiprocess/process.py", line 315, in _bootstrap
self.run()
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.12/dist-packages/multiprocess/process.py", line 108, in run
self._target(*self._args, **self._kwargs)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.12/dist-packages/multiprocess/pool.py", line 114, in worker
task = get()
^^^^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.12/dist-packages/multiprocess/queues.py", line 371, in get
return _ForkingPickler.loads(res)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.12/dist-packages/dill/_dill.py", line 327, in loads
return load(file, ignore, **kwds)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.12/dist-packages/dill/_dill.py", line 313, in load
return Unpickler(file, ignore=ignore, **kwds).load()
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.12/dist-packages/dill/_dill.py", line 525, in load
obj = StockUnpickler.load(self)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.12/dist-packages/dill/_dill.py", line 659, in _create_code
if len(args) == 16: return CodeType(*args)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
TypeError: code() argument 13 must be str, not int
```

After upgrading dill to the latest 0.4.0 with "pip install --upgrade dill", it can pass. So it seems that there is a compatibility issue between dill 0.3.4 and python 3.11+, because python 3.10 works fine. 


Is the dill deterministic issue mentioned in https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/blob/main/setup.py#L117) still valid? Any plan to unpin? 


Comments: related: https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/issues/7510

we need to do more tests to see if latest `dill` is deterministic
Title: TensorFlow RaggedTensor Support (batch-level)
State: open
Labels: name: enhancement
description: New feature or request

### Feature request

Hi,

Currently datasets does not support RaggedTensor output on batch-level.
When building a Object Detection Dataset (with TensorFlow) I need to enable RaggedTensors as that's how BBoxes & classes are expected from the Keras Model POV.

Currently there's a error thrown saying that "Nested Data is not supported".

It'd be very helpful if this was fixed! :)

### Motivation

Enabling Object Detection pipelines for TensorFlow.

### Your contribution

With guidance I'd happily help making the PR.

The current implementation with DataCollator and later enforcing `np.array` is the problematic part (at the end of `np_get_batch` in `tf_utils.py`). As `numpy` don't support "Raggednes"

Comments: Keras doesn't support other inputs other than tf.data.Dataset objects ? it's a bit painful to have to support and maintain this kind of integration

Is there a way to use a `datasets.Dataset` with outputs formatted as tensors / ragged tensors instead ? like in https://huggingface.co/docs/datasets/use_with_tensorflow#dataset-formatI'll give it a try when I get the time. But quite sure I already tested the `with_format` approach.

Keras when using TF as backend converts the datasets into `tf.data.Dataset`, much like you do.Hi @Lundez! Thanks for raising this — very valid point, especially for Object Detection use-cases.

You're right that np_get_batch currently enforces numpy batching, which breaks RaggedTensor support due to its inability to handle nested structures. This likely needs a redesign to allow TensorFlow-native batching in specific formats.

Before diving into a code change though, could you confirm:

Does `.with_format("tensorflow")` (without batching) return a `tf.data.Dataset` that works if batching is deferred to `model.fit()`?

Have you tried something like:

```python
tf_dataset = dataset.with_format("tensorflow").to_tf_dataset(
    columns=["image", "labels"],
    label_cols=None,
    batch_size=None  # No batching here
)
model.fit(tf_dataset.batch(BATCH_SIZE))  # Use RaggedTensor batching here
```

If this works, it might be worth updating the documentation rather than changing batching logic inside datasets itself.

That said, happy to explore changes if batching needs to be supported natively for RaggedTensor. Just flagging that it’d require some careful design due to existing numpy assumptions.Hi, we've had to move on for now. 

We have actually also moved to dense tensors to make it possible to xla complie the training. 

But I'll check when I'm back from vacation which is far into the future. 

Thanks
Title: Add custom fingerprint support to `from_generator`
State: closed

This PR adds `dataset_id_suffix` parameter to 'Dataset.from_generator' function.

`Dataset.from_generator` function passes all of its arguments to `BuilderConfig.create_config_id`, including generator function itself. `BuilderConfig.create_config_id` function tries to hash all the args, which can take a large amount of time or even cause MemoryError if the dataset processed in a generator function is large enough.

This PR allows user to pass a custom fingerprint (`dataset_id_suffix`) to be used as a suffix in a dataset name instead of the one generated by hashing the args.

This PR is a possible solution of #7513 

Comments: This is great !

What do you think of passing `config_id=` directly to the builder instead of just the suffix ? This would be a power user argument though, or for internal use. And in from_generator the new argument can be `fingerprint=` as in `Dataset.__init__()`

The `config_id` can be defined using something like `config_id = "default-fingerprint=" + fingerprint`

I feel ike this could make the Dataset API more coherent if we avoid introducing a new argument while we can juste use `fingerprint=`@lhoestq could you please re-review the changes I made?@lhoestq ping
I also added a simple test for the `fingerprint` parameter@lhoestq could you please review the PR? I implemented the requested changes and added a test for the added `fingerprint` argThe docs for this PR live [here](https://moon-ci-docs.huggingface.co/docs/datasets/pr_7533). All of your documentation changes will be reflected on that endpoint. The docs are available until 30 days after the last update.
Title: Document the HF_DATASETS_CACHE environment variable in the datasets cache documentation
State: closed


This pull request updates the Datasets documentation to include the `HF_DATASETS_CACHE` environment variable. While the current documentation only mentions `HF_HOME` for overriding the default cache directory, `HF_DATASETS_CACHE` is also a supported and useful option for specifying a custom cache location for datasets stored in Arrow format.

This addition is based on the discussion in (https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/issues/7457), where users noted the absence of this variable in the documentation despite its functionality. The update adds a new section to `cache.mdx` that explains how to use `HF_DATASETS_CACHE` with an example.

This change aims to improve clarity and help users better manage their cache directories when working in shared environments or with limited local storage.

Closes #7457.

Comments: The docs for this PR live [here](https://moon-ci-docs.huggingface.co/docs/datasets/pr_7532). All of your documentation changes will be reflected on that endpoint. The docs are available until 30 days after the last update.Your clarification in your comment at https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/issues/7480#issuecomment-2833640084 sounds great, would you like to update this PR to include it ?Hi @lhoestq, I’ve updated the documentation to reflect the clarifications discussed in #7480. Let me know if anything else is needed!
Title: How to solve "Spaces stuck in Building" problems
State: closed

### Describe the bug

Public spaces may stuck in Building after restarting, error log as follows:

build error
Unexpected job error

ERROR: failed to push spaces-registry.huggingface.tech/spaces/*:cpu-*-*: unexpected status from HEAD request to https://spaces-registry.huggingface.tech/v2/spaces/*/manifests/cpu-*-*: 401 Unauthorized

### Steps to reproduce the bug

Restart space / Factory rebuild cannot avoid it

### Expected behavior

Fix this problem

### Environment info

no requirements.txt can still happen
python gradio spaces

Comments: I'm facing the same issue—Space stuck in "Building" even after restart and Factory rebuild. Any fix?
> I'm facing the same issue—Space stuck in "Building" even after restart and Factory rebuild. Any fix?

Also see https://github.com/huggingface/huggingface_hub/issues/3019I'm facing the same issue. The build fails with the same error, and restarting won't help. Is there a fix or ETA?
Title: audio folder builder cannot detect custom split name
State: open

### Describe the bug

when using audio folder builder (`load_dataset("audiofolder", data_dir="/path/to/folder")`), it cannot detect custom split name other than train/validation/test

### Steps to reproduce the bug

i have the following folder structure
```
my_dataset/
├── train/
│   ├── lorem.wav
│   ├── …
│   └── metadata.csv
├── test/
│   ├── ipsum.wav
│   ├── …
│   └── metadata.csv
├── validation/
│   ├── dolor.wav
│   ├── …
│   └── metadata.csv
└── custom/
    ├── sit.wav
    ├── …
    └── metadata.csv
```
using `ds = load_dataset("audiofolder", data_dir="/path/to/my_dataset")`

### Expected behavior

i got `ds` with only 3 splits train/validation/test, whenever i rename train/validation/test folder it also disappear if i re-create `ds`

### Environment info

- `datasets` version: 3.5.0
- Platform: Windows-11-10.0.26100-SP0
- Python version: 3.12.8
- `huggingface_hub` version: 0.30.2
- PyArrow version: 18.1.0
- Pandas version: 2.2.3
- `fsspec` version: 2024.9.0
Title: Data Studio Error: Convert JSONL incorrectly
State: open

### Describe the bug

Hi there,

I uploaded a dataset here https://huggingface.co/datasets/V-STaR-Bench/V-STaR, but I found that Data Studio incorrectly convert the "bboxes" value for the whole dataset. Therefore, anyone who downloaded the dataset via the API would get the wrong "bboxes" value in the data file.

Could you help me address the issue?

Many thanks,



### Steps to reproduce the bug

The JSONL file of [V_STaR_test_release.jsonl](https://huggingface.co/datasets/V-STaR-Bench/V-STaR/blob/main/V_STaR_test_release.jsonl) has the correct values of every "bboxes" for each sample.

But in the Data Studio, we can see that the values of "bboxes" have changed, and load the dataset via API will also get the wrong values.

### Expected behavior

Fix the bug to correctly download my dataset.

### Environment info

- `datasets` version: 2.16.1
- Platform: Linux-5.14.0-427.22.1.el9_4.x86_64-x86_64-with-glibc2.34
- Python version: 3.10.16
- `huggingface_hub` version: 0.29.3
- PyArrow version: 19.0.0
- Pandas version: 2.2.3
- `fsspec` version: 2023.10.0

Comments: Hi ! Your JSONL file is incompatible with Arrow / Parquet. Indeed in Arrow / Parquet every dict should have the same keys, while in your dataset the bboxes have varying keys.

This causes the Data Studio to treat the bboxes as if each row was missing the keys from other rows.

Feel free to take a look at the docs on object segmentation to see how to format a dataset with bboxes: https://huggingface.co/docs/datasets/object_detection
Title: Auto-merge option for `convert-to-parquet`
State: closed
Labels: name: enhancement
description: New feature or request

### Feature request

Add a command-line option, e.g. `--auto-merge-pull-request` that enables automatic merging of the commits created by the `convert-to-parquet` tool.

### Motivation

Large datasets may result in dozens of PRs due to the splitting mechanism. Each of these has to be manually accepted via the website.

### Your contribution

Happy to look into submitting a PR if this is of interest to maintainers.

Comments: Alternatively, there could be an option to switch from submitting PRs to just committing changes directly to `main`.Why not, I'd be in favor of `--merge-pull-request` to call `HfApi().merge_pull_request()` at the end of the conversion :) feel free to open a PR if you'd like#self-assignClosing since convert to parquet has been removed... https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/pull/7592#issuecomment-3073053138
Title: Faster downloads/uploads with Xet storage
State: open

![Image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6e247f4a-d436-4428-a682-fe18ebdc73a9)

## Xet is out !

Over the past few weeks, Hugging Face’s [Xet Team](https://huggingface.co/xet-team) took a major step forward by [migrating the first Model and Dataset repositories off LFS and to Xet storage](https://huggingface.co/posts/jsulz/911431940353906).

See more information on the HF blog: https://huggingface.co/blog/xet-on-the-hub

You can already enable Xet on Hugging Face account to benefit from faster downloads and uploads :)

We finalized an official integration with the `huggingface_hub` library that means you get the benefits of Xet without any significant changes to your current workflow.


## Previous versions of `datasets`

For older versions of `datasets` you might see this warning in `push_to_hub()`:

```
Uploading files as bytes or binary IO objects is not supported by Xet Storage.
```

This means the `huggingface_hub` + Xet integration isn't enabled for your version of `datasets`.

You can fix this by updating to `datasets>=3.6.0` and `huggingface_hub>=0.31.0`

```
pip install -U datasets huggingface_hub
```

## The future

Stay tuned for more Xet optimizations, especially on [Xet-optimized Parquet](https://huggingface.co/blog/improve_parquet_dedupe)
Title: Fix indexing in split commit messages
State: closed

When a large commit is split up, it seems the commit index in the message is zero-based while the total number is one-based. I came across this running `convert-to-parquet` and was wondering why there was no `6-of-6` commit. This PR fixes that by adding one to the commit index, so both are one-based.

Current behavior:
<img width="463" alt="Screenshot 2025-04-17 at 1 00 17 PM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7f3d389e-cb92-405d-a3c2-f2b1cdf0cb79" />

Comments: Hi ! this is expected and is coherent with other naming conventions in `datasets` such as parquet shards naming
Title: fix: Image Feature in Datasets Library Fails to Handle bytearray Objects from Spark DataFrames (#7517)
State: closed

## Task
Support bytes-like objects (bytes and bytearray) in Features classes

### Description
The `Features` classes only accept `bytes` objects for binary data, but not `bytearray`. This leads to errors when using `IterableDataset.from_spark()` with Spark DataFrames as they contain `bytearray` objects, even though both `bytes` and `bytearray` are valid [*bytes-like objects* in Python](https://docs.python.org/3/glossary.html#term-bytes-like-object).

### Changes
- Updated `Features` classes to accept both `bytes` and `bytearray` types for binary data fields.

### Reasoning
- `bytes` and `bytearray` serve the same purpose for binary data, with the only difference being mutability.
- Modifying the Spark iterator to convert `bytearray` to `bytes` would be a workaround, not a true fix. I think the correct solution is to accept all bytes-like objects as input.
- This approach is more robust and future-proof since Python 3.12+ provides a [standard way to check for buffer protocol](https://docs.python.org/3/c-api/buffer.html#bufferobjects).

### Testing
- Added tests to cover `bytearray` inputs for image features.

### Related Issues
- Fixes: #7517 

Comments: @lhoestq let me know if you prefer to change the spark iterator so it outputs `bytes`The docs for this PR live [here](https://moon-ci-docs.huggingface.co/docs/datasets/pr_7521). All of your documentation changes will be reflected on that endpoint. The docs are available until 30 days after the last update.