NEUROSCIENTIFIC INVE STIGATIONS OF MUSICAL RHYTHM
(2014)

Music occurs in every human society, unfolds over time, and enables synchronized movements. The neural mechanisms underlying the perception, cognition, and production of musical rhythm have been investigated using a variety of methods. FMRI studies in particular have shown that the motor system is crucially involved in rhythm and beat perception. Studies using other methods demonstrate that oscillatory neural activity entrains to regularities in musical rhythm, and that motor system excitability is modulated by listening to musical rhythm. This review paper describes some of the recent neuroscientific findings regarding musical rhythm, and especially the perception of a regular beat. INTRODUCTION The temporal structure of music enables synchronized movement, such as tapping one’s foot, clapping, or dancing to the ‘beat’ of musical rhythms. Such movement is precisely timed to align with the periodic, salient beats in the music, and with the movements of other individuals. Given this relationship between musical rhythm and movement, it is perhaps unsurprising that the brain’s motor system is heavily involved in the neural processing of auditory rhythms. However, it is a relatively recent discovery that the motor system is involved even in the absence of movement – subtle differences in the temporal structure or context of an auditory rhythm can elicit robust differences in motor system activity. These discoveries are the topic of this review paper, with a focus on findings from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). FMRI measures the change in oxygenated blood levels following neural activity [see 1, 2]. This ‘blood-oxygen-level dependent’ (or BOLD) signal is considered to be an indirect measure of brain activity, and therefore increases in BOLD are termed ‘activations’ in this review. Findings from patient studies, as well as electroencephalography (EEG), magnetoencephalography (MEG), and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies will also be discussed. Although much theoretic and empirical work has sought to explain why certain temporal patterns elicit movement (e.g., dancing) while others do not [3-5], and the evolutionary basis for human sensitivity to musical rhythm [6-7], this review will focus on the neural substrates of rhythm perception and the role of individual differences, expertise, and sensory modality. RHYTHM AND BEAT IN THE BRAIN When human participants listen to rhythms (i.e., auditory sequences) with or without a beat, widespread activity is observed in the cortical motor system, especially in the supplementary motor area (SMA) and premotor cortex (PMC), as well as subcortical regions such as the basal ganglia and cerebellum [8-14]. Rhythms that are composed of intervals that are integer ratios of one another, and have accents occurring at regular intervals, tend to elicit the perception of a regular, emphasized beat, and beats are usually organized in a metre (a temporal structure determined by the cyclical pattern of strong and weak beats; see Figure 1). Compared to rhythms without a beat, listening to beat-based rhythms elicits more activity in the SMA and the basal ganglia [10]. The importance of the basal ganglia in beat perception was highlighted in a study demonstrating that patients with Parkinson’s disease have impaired