Spelling Correction for Morphologically Rich Language: a Case Study of Russian
(2017)

We present an algorithm for automatic correction of spelling errors on the sentence level, which uses noisy channel model and feature-based reranking of hypotheses. Our system is designed for Russian and clearly outperforms the winner of SpellRuEval-2016 competition. We show that language model size has the greatest influence on spelling correction quality. We also experiment with different types of features and show that morphological and semantic information also improves the accuracy of spellchecking. The task of automatic spelling correction has applications in different areas including correction of search queries, spellchecking in browsers and text editors etc. It attracted intensive attention in early era of modern NLP. Many researchers addressed both the problems of effective candidates generation (Kernighan et al., 1990; Brill and Moore, 2000) and their adequate ranking (Golding and Roth, 1999; Whitelaw et al., 2009). Recently, the focus has moved to close but separate areas of text normalization (Han et al., 2013) and grammar errors correction (Ng et al., 2014), though the task of spellchecking is far from being perfectly solved. Most of early works were conducted for English for which NLP tasks are usually easier than for other languages due to simplicity of its morphology and strict word order. Also there were studies for Arabic (papers of QALB-2014 Shared Task (Ng et al., 2014)) and Chinese (Wu et al., 2013), but for most languages the problem still is open. In context of Slavic languages, there were just a few works including Sorokin and Shavrina (2016) for Russian, Richter et al. (2012) for Czech and Hladek et al. (2013) for Slovak. However, spelling correction becomes actual again due to intensive growth of social media. Indeed, corpora of Web texts including blogs, microblogs, forums etc. become the main sources for corpus studies. Most of these corpora are very large so they are collected and processed automatically with only limited manual correction. Hence, most texts in such corpora contain various types of spelling variation, from mere typos and orthographic errors to dialectal and sociolinguistic peculiarities. Moreover, orthographic errors are unavoidable since the more social media texts we have, the higher is the fraction of those, whose authors are not well-educated and therefore tend to make mistakes. That increases the percentage of out-of-vocabulary words in text, which affects the quality of any further NLP task from lemmatization to any kind of parsing or information extraction. Summarizing, it is desirable to detect and correct at least undoubtable misspellings in Web texts with high precision. Unfortunately, there were very few studies dealing with spellchecking for real-world Web texts, e.g. LiveJournal or Facebook. Most authors investigated spelling correction in a rather restricted fashion. They focused on selecting a correct word from a small pre-defined confusion set (e.g., adopt/adapt), skipping a problem of detecting misprints or generating the set of possible corrections. Often researchers did not deal with real-world errors just randomly introducing typos in every word with some probability. Therefore, spelling correction has no “intelligent baseline” algorithm such as trigram HMM-models for morphological parsing or CBOW vectors for distributional similarity. One of the goals of our work is to propose such a baseline. The principal feature of our approach is that it works with entire sentences, not on the level of separate words. A serious problem for research on spellcheck45 ing is the lack of publicly available datasets for spelling correction in different languages. Fortunately, recently such a corpus was created for Russian during SpellRuEval-2016 competition (Sorokin et al., 2016). Russian is rather complex for NLP tasks because of its developed nominal and verb morphology and free word order. Therefore it is well-suited for extensive testing of spelling correction algorithms, although our results are applicable to any other language having similar properties. We propose a reranking algorithm for automatic spelling correction and evaluate it on SpellRuEval2016 dataset. The paper is organized as follows: Section 1 summarizes previous work on automatic spelling correction focusing on context-sensitive approaches, Section 2 contains our algorithm, Section 3 describes test data, Section 4 analyzes the performance of our system depending on different settings and we conclude in Section 5.