Anchor: The analysis discusses the beneficial effects and the adverse effects of each alternative and concludes that the second alternative offered the greatest environmental return for the federal dollars spent, provided program managers and participants the greatest flexibility in program administration, gave effective conservation coverage across the land, and involved a large number of participants.
Entailed: The advantages and disadvantages are weighted out on the analysis.
Contradiction: The analysis is a financial statement in nature.
Contradiction: A man smoking a cigar.
Contradiction: A baby plays with a ball on the floor.
Contradiction: Two men and two dogs are on a farm, one is holding a pail.
Contradiction: A lot of federal agencies have performance management systems.