Anchor: The appeals court rapped the agency for its scare tactics, saying it must base its conclusions on solid facts and a realistic appraisal of the danger rather than on vague fears extrapolated beyond any foreseeable threat.
Entailed: A court said that the agency must base its conclusions on facts rather than vague fears.
Contradiction: The court supported the agency and thought they way they dealt with things was friendly.
Contradiction: The agency was conducting investigations with the utmost competence and professionalism.
Contradiction: The appeals court found nothing wrong with the agency's practices.
Contradiction: The blonde's beauty is enhanced by her snottiness.
Contradiction: Men pushing a truck.