Anchor: That case discussed the nature of television broadcasting, not to determine whether government regulation would alter its usual functioning and thus violate the First Amendment (no government regulation was even at issue in the case), but rather to determine whether state-owned television is a public forum under our First Amendment jurisprudence.
Entailed: The nature of television broadcasting was a subject in that case.
Contradiction: That case concerned whether government regulation should change its usual functioning.
Contradiction: He hates weights and the stationary bike too.
Contradiction: The room was simple.
Contradiction: When using the same test to screen communities with lower case rates, the test works good if not better. 
Contradiction: Jesus does not appear as the gentle figure described in the Bible.