Anchor: If the LSC-funded lawyers were here arguing that the statute permitted representation of individual welfare claimants who did not challenge existing law, I venture to say that the Court would endorse their argument- perhaps with stirring language about the importance of aid to welfare applicants and the Court's unwillingness to presume without clear indication that Congress would want to eliminate it.
Entailed: The Court is unwilling to be presumptuous in matters linked to Congress.
Contradiction: Aid to welfare applicants is federally mandated.
Contradiction: The pristine sidewalk is outside of the shop.
Contradiction: They were at the beach
Contradiction: Monsanto is not aware that farmers prefer fertile seeds over infertile.
Contradiction: Children are playing in sand.