[20] Jogendra Nath Kundu, Akshay R Kulkarni, Suvaansh Bhambri, Deepesh Mehta, Shreyas Anand Kulkarni, Varun Jampani, and Venkatesh Babu Radhakrishnan. Balancing discriminability and transferability for source-free domain adaptation. In ICML, pages 11710-11728, 2022.
[21] Jogendra Nath Kundu, Naveen Venkat, R Venkatesh Babu, et al. Universal source-free domain adaptation. In CVPR, pages 4544-4553, 2020.
[22] Brian Lester, Rami Al-Rfou, and Noah Constant. The power of scale for parameter-efficient prompt tuning. In EMNLP, pages 3045-3059, 2021.
[23] Rui Li, Qianfen Jiao, Wenming Cao, Hau-San Wong, and Si Wu. Model adaptation: Unsupervised domain adaptation without source data. In CVPR, pages 9641-9650, 2020.
[24] Ruihuang Li, Shuai Li, Chenhang He, Yabin Zhang, Xu Jia, and Lei Zhang. Class-balanced pixel-level self-labeling for domain adaptive semantic segmentation. In CVPR, pages 11593-11603, 2022.
[25] Xiang Lisa Li and Percy Liang. Prefix-tuning: Optimizing continuous prompts for generation. In ACL, pages 4582-4597, 2021.
[26] Jian Liang, Dapeng Hu, and Jiashi Feng. Do we really need to access the source data? source hypothesis transfer for unsupervised domain adaptation. In ICML, pages 6028-6039, 2020.
[27] Jian Liang, Dapeng Hu, Yunbo Wang, Ran He, and Jiashi Feng. Source data-absent unsupervised domain adaptation through hypothesis transfer and labeling transfer. TPAMI, 44(11):8602-8617, 2021.
[28] Pengfei Liu, Weizhe Yuan, Jinlan Fu, Zhengbao Jiang, Hiroaki Hayashi, and Graham Neubig. Pre-train, prompt, and predict: A systematic survey of prompting methods in natural language processing. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(9):1-35, 2023.
[29] Xiao Liu, Kaixuan Ji, Yicheng Fu, Weng Lam Tam, Zhengxiao Du, Zhilin Yang, and Jie Tang. P-tuning v2: Prompt tuning can be comparable to fine-tuning universally across scales and tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.07602, 2021.
[30] Yang Liu, Wei Zhang, and Jun Wang. Source-free domain adaptation for semantic segmentation. In CVPR, pages 1215-1224, 2021.
[31] Ze Liu, Yutong Lin, Yue Cao, Han Hu, Yixuan Wei, Zheng Zhang, Stephen Lin, and Baining Guo. Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows. In ICCV, pages 10012-10022, 2021.
[32] Jochem Loedeman, Maarten C Stol, Tengda Han, and Yuki M Asano. Prompt generation networks for efficient adaptation of frozen vision transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.06466, 2022.
[33] Yuning Lu, Jianzhuang Liu, Yonggang Zhang, Yajing Liu, and Xinmei Tian. Prompt distribution learning. In CVPR, pages 5206-5215, 2022.
[34] Namuk Park and Songkuk Kim. How do vision transformers work? arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.06709, 2022.
[35] Zhen Qiu, Yifan Zhang, Hongbin Lin, Shuaicheng Niu, Yanxia Liu, Qing Du, and Mingkui Tan. Source-free domain adaptation via avatar prototype generation and adaptation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.15326, 2021.
[36] Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, et al. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In ICML, pages 8748-8763, 2021.
[37] Stephan R Richter, Vibhav Vineet, Stefan Roth, and Vladlen Koltun. Playing for data: Ground truth from computer games. In ECCV, pages 102-118, 2016.
[38] German Ros, Laura Sellart, Joanna Materzynska, David Vazquez, and Antonio M Lopez. The synthia dataset: A large collection of synthetic images for semantic segmentation of urban scenes. In CVPR, pages 3234-3243, 2016.
[39] Christos Sakaridis, Dengxin Dai, Simon Hecker, and Luc Van Gool. Model adaptation with synthetic and real data for semantic dense foggy scene understanding. In ECCV, 2018.
[40] Kihyuk Sohn, Yuan Hao, José Lezama, Luisa Polania, Huiwen Chang, Han Zhang, Irfan Essa, and Lu Jiang. Visual prompt tuning for generative transfer learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.00990, 2022.