[12] Hila Chefer, Yuval Alaluf, Yael Vinker, Lior Wolf, and Daniel Cohen-Or. Attend-and-excite: Attention-based semantic guidance for text-to-image diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.13826, 2023.
[13] Anna Rohrbach, Lisa Anne Hendricks, Kaylee Burns, Trevor Darrell, and Kate Saenko. Object hallucination in image captioning. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 4035-4045, Brussels, Belgium, October-November 2018. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/D18-1437. URL https://aclanthology.org/D18-1437.
[14] Jungo Kasai, Keisuke Sakaguchi, Lavinia Dunagan, Jacob Morrison, Ronan Le Bras, Yejin Choi, and Noah A. Smith. Transparent human evaluation for image captioning. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 3464-3478, Seattle, United States, July 2022. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.254. URL https://aclanthology.org/2022.naacl-main.254.
[15] Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, et al. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In International conference on machine learning, pages 8748-8763. PMLR, 2021.
[16] Mert Yuksekgonul, Federico Bianchi, Pratyusha Kalluri, Dan Jurafsky, and James Zou. When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it? In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2022.
[17] Soravit Changpinyo, Doron Kukliansky, Idan Szpektor, Xi Chen, Nan Ding, and Radu Soricut. All you may need for VQA are image captions. In NAACL, 2022.
[18] Or Honovich, Leshem Choshen, Roeah Araroni, Ella Neeman, Idan Szpektor, and Omri Abend.  $Q^2$ : Evaluating factual consistency in knowledge-grounded dialogues via question generation and question answering. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.08202, 2021.
[19] Or Honovich, Roee Aharoni, Jonathan Herzig, Hagai Taitelbaum, Doron Kukliansy, Vered Cohen, Thomas Scialom, Idan Szpektor, Avinatan Hassidim, and Yossi Matias. TRUE: Reevaluating factual consistency evaluation. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 3905-3920, Seattle, United States, July 2022. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.287. URL https://aclanthology.org/2022.naacl-main.287.
[20] Philippe Laban, Tobias Schnabel, Paul N. Bennett, and Marti A. Hearst. SummaC: Re-Visiting NLI-based Models for Inconsistency Detection in Summarization. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 10:163-177, 02 2022. ISSN 2307-387X. doi: 10.1162/tacl_a_00453. URL https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00453.
[21] Liyan Tang, Tanya Goyal, Alexander R Fabbri, Philippe Laban, Jiacheng Xu, Semih Yahvuz, Wojciech Krysciński, Justin F Rousseau, and Greg Durrett. Understanding factual errors in summarization: Errors, summarizers, datasets, error detectors. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.12854, 2022.
[22] Jiahui Yu, Zirui Wang, Vijay Vasudevan, Legg Yeung, Mojtaba Seyedhosseini, and Yonghui Wu. Coca: Contrastive captioners are image-text foundation models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.01917, 2022.
[23] Peng Wang, An Yang, Rui Men, Junyang Lin, Shuai Bai, Zhikang Li, Jianxin Ma, Chang Zhou, Jingren Zhou, and Hongxia Yang. OFA: Unifying architectures, tasks, and modalities through a simple sequence-to-sequence learning framework. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 23318-23340. PMLR, 2022.
[24] Tristan Thrush, Ryan Jiang, Max Bartolo, Amanpreet Singh, Adina Williams, Douwe Kiela, and Candace Ross. Winoground: Probing vision and language models for visio-linguistic compositionality. ArXiv preprint, abs/2204.03162, 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.03162.