[17] Thibaut Horel, Lorenzo Masoero, Raj Agrawal, Daria Roithmayr, and Trevor Campbell. The CPD data set: Personnel, use of force, and complaints in the Chicago Police Department. 35th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2021) Track on Datasets and Benchmarks., 2021.
[18] Frances Ding, Moritz Hardt, John Miller, and Ludwig Schmidt. Retiring adult: New datasets for fair machine learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34, 2021.
[19] Alessandro Fabris, Stefano Messina, Gianmaria Silvello, and Gian Antonio Susto. Algorithmic fairness datasets: the story so far. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 36(6):2074-2152, 2022.
[20] Elliott Ash, Sergio Galletta, Dominik Hangartner, Yotam Margalit, and Matteo Pinna. The effect of fox news on health behavior during covid-19. Available at SSRN 3636762, 2020.
[21] Samir Passi and Solon Barocas. Problem formulation and fairness. In Proceedings of the conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency, pages 39-48, 2019.
[22] Kim Steven Hunt and Robert Dumville. *Recidivism among federal offenders: A comprehensive overview*. United States Sentencing Commission, 2016.
[23] Himabindu Lakkaraju, Jon Kleinberg, Jure Leskovec, Jens Ludwig, and Sendhil Mullainathan. The selective labels problem: Evaluating algorithmic predictions in the presence of unobservables. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 275-284, 2017.
[24] Naman Goel, Alfonso Amayuelas, Amit Deshpande, and Amit Sharma. The importance of modeling data missingness in algorithmic fairness: A causal perspective. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2021.
[25] Sam Corbett-Davies, Emma Pierson, Avi Feller, Sharad Goel, and Aziz Huq. Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairness. In International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), 2017. doi:10.1145/3097983.3098095.
[26] OpenAI. Gpt-4 technical report, 2023. arXiv:2303.08774.
[27] Fabian Pedregosa, Gáel Varoquaux, Alexandre Gramfort, Vincent Michel, Bertrand Thirion, Olivier Grisel, Mathieu Blondel, Peter Prettenhofer, Ron Weiss, Vincent Dubourg, et al. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in python. the Journal of machine learning research, 12:2825-2830, 2011.
[28] Tianqi Chen and Carlos Guestrin. Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. In Proceedings of the 22nd acm SIGkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 785-794, 2016.
[29] Muhammad Bilal Zafar, Isabel Valera, Manuel Gomez Rodriguez, and Krishna P. Gummadi. Fairness beyond disparate treatment & disparate impact: Learning classification without disparate mistreatment. In International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW), 2017. doi:10.1145/3038912.3052660.
[30] Frequently asked questions, wisconsin circuit court access. Accessed:2023-04-15. URL: https://wcca.wicourts.gov/faq.html.
[31] Miri Zilka, Riccardo Fogliato, Jiri Hron, Bradley Butcher, Carolyn Ashurst, and Adrian Weller. The progression of disparities within the criminal justice system: Differential enforcement and risk assessment instruments. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pages 1553–1569, 2023.
[32] Dasha Pruss. Ghosting the machine: Judicial resistance to a recidivism risk assessment instrument. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pages 312-323, 2023.
[33] Angelina Wang, Sayash Kapoor, Solon Barocas, and Arvind Narayanan. Against predictive optimization: On the legitimacy of decision-making algorithms that optimize predictive accuracy. Available at SSRN, 2022.