[3] Simon Baron-Cohen, Alan M Leslie, and Uta Frith. Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition, 21(1):37–46, 1985.
[4] Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, et al. Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:1877-1901, 2020.
[5] Sébastien Bubeck, Varun Chandrasekaran, Ronen Eldan, Johannes Gehrke, Eric Horvitz, Ece Kamar, Peter Lee, Yin Tat Lee, Yuanzhi Li, Scott Lundberg, et al. Sparks of artificial general intelligence: Early experiments with gpt-4. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.12712, 2023.
[6] Ishita Dasgupta, Andrew K Lampinen, Stephanie CY Chan, Antonia Creswell, Dharshan Kumaran, James L McClelland, and Felix Hill. Language models show human-like content effects on reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.07051, 2022.
[7] David Dodell-Feder, Jorie Koster-Hale, Marina Bedny, and Rebecca Saxe. fmri item analysis in a theory of mind task. neuroimage, 55(2):705-712, 2011.
[8] Avia Efrat and Omer Levy. The turking test: Can language models understand instructions? arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.11982, 2020.
[9] Jan-Philipp Franken, Simon Valentin, Christopher G Lucas, and Neil Bramley. Naive information aggregation in human social learning. *PsyArXiv*, 2023.
[10] Chris Frith and Uta Frith. Theory of mind. Current biology, 15(17):R644–R645, 2005.
[11] Kanishk Gandhi, Gala Stojnic, Brenden M Lake, and Moira R Dillon. Baby intuitions benchmark (bib): Discerning the goals, preferences, and actions of others. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34:9963–9976, 2021.
[12] Georgi Gerganov. llama.cpp. https://github.com/ggerganov/llama.cpp, 2023.
[13] György Gergely and Gergely Csibra. Teleological reasoning in infancy: The naive theory of rational action. Trends in cognitive sciences, 7(7):287-292, 2003.
[14] Noah D Goodman, Chris L Baker, and Joshua B Tenenbaum. Cause and intent: Social reasoning in causal learning. In Proceedings of the 31st annual conference of the cognitive science society, pages 2759-2764. Cognitive Science Society Austin, TX, 2009.
[15] Dylan Hadfield-Menell, Stuart J Russell, Pieter Abbeel, and Anca Dragan. Cooperative inverse reinforcement learning. Advances in neural information processing systems, 29, 2016.
[16] Thomas Hartvigsen, Saadia Gabriel, Hamid Palangi, Maarten Sap, Dipankar Ray, and Ece Kamar. Toxigen: A large-scale machine-generated dataset for adversarial and implicit hate speech detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.09509, 2022.
[17] Takeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo, and Yusuke Iwasawa. Large language models are zero-shot reasoners. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.11916, 2022.
[18] Michal Kosinski. Theory of mind may have spontaneously emerged in large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.02083, 2023.
[19] Eliza Kosoy, Adrian Liu, Jasmine L Collins, David Chan, Jessica B Hamrick, Nan Rosemary Ke, Sandy Huang, Bryanna Kaufmann, John Canny, and Alison Gopnik. Learning causal overhypotheses through exploration in children and computational models. In Conference on Causal Learning and Reasoning, pages 390–406. PMLR, 2022.
[20] Brenden M Lake, Tomer D Ullman, Joshua B Tenenbaum, and Samuel J Gershman. Building machines that learn and think like people. Behavioral and brain sciences, 40:e253, 2017.
[21] Matt Le, Y-Lan Boureau, and Maximilian Nickel. Revisiting the evaluation of theory of mind through question answering. In Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2019.