[67] H. Shah, K. Tamuly, A. Raghunathan, P. Jain, and P. Netrapalli. The pitfalls of simplicity bias in neural networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 9573-9585, 2020.
[68] R. Shen, S. Bubeck, and S. Gunasekar. Data augmentation as feature manipulation. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 19773-19808, 2022.
[69] Y. Shi, J. Seely, P. Torr, S. N, A. Hannun, N. Usunier, and G. Synnaeve. Gradient matching for domain generalization. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2022.
[70] R. Shwartz-Ziv and N. Tishby. Opening the black box of deep neural networks via information. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.00810, 2017.
[71] R. Taori, A. Dave, V. Shankar, N. Carlini, B. Recht, and L. Schmidt. Measuring robustness to natural distribution shifts in image classification. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2020.
[72] J. Taylor, B. Earnshaw, B. Mabey, M. Victors, and J. Yosinski. Rrx1: An image set for cellular morphological variation across many experimental batches. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2019.
[73] D. Teney, E. Abbasnejad, S. Lucey, and A. van den Hengel. Evading the simplicity bias: Training a diverse set of models discovers solutions with superior OOD generalization. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 16740-16751, 2022.
[74] D. Teney, Y. Lin, S. J. Oh, and E. Abbasnejad. ID and OOD performance are sometimes inversely correlated on real-world datasets. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.00613, 2022.
[75] V. Vapnik. Principles of risk minimization for learning theory. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 831-838, 1991.
[76] Y. Wald, A. Feder, D. Greenfeld, and U. Shalit. On calibration and out-of-domain generalization. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 2215-2227, 2021.
[77] Z. Wang, Y. Chen, Y. Duan, W. Li, B. Han, J. Cheng, and H. Tong. Towards out-of-distribution generalizable predictions of chemical kinetics properties. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2310.03152, 2023.
[78] Z. Wen and Y. Li. Toward understanding the feature learning process of self-supervised contrastive learning. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 11112-11122, 2021.
[79] F. Wenzel, A. Dittadi, P. V. Gehler, C.-J. Simon-Gabriel, M. Horn, D. Zietlow, D. Kernert, C. Russell, T. Brox, B. Schiele, B. Schölkopf, and F. Locatello. Assaying out-of-distribution generalization in transfer learning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2022.
[80] M. Wortsman, G. Ilharco, J. W. Kim, M. Li, S. Kornblith, R. Roelofs, R. G. Lopes, H. Hajishirzi, A. Farhadi, H. Namkoong, and L. Schmidt. Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot models. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 7949-7961, 2022.
[81] H. Ye, J. Zou, and L. Zhang. Freeze then train: Towards provable representation learning under spurious correlations and feature noise. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.11075, 2022.
[82] J. Zhang and L. Bottou. Learning useful representations for shifting tasks and distributions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.07346, 2022.
[83] J. Zhang, D. Lopez-Paz, and L. Bottou. Rich feature construction for the optimization-generalization dilemma. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 26397-26411, 2022.
[84] Y. Zhang, M. Gong, T. Liu, G. Niu, X. Tian, B. Han, B. Scholkopf, and K. Zhang. Adversarial robustness through the lens of causality. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2022.