[82] Z. Wang, A. C. Bovik, H. R. Sheikh, and E. P. Simoncelli. Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 13(4):600-612, 2004.
[83] A. Glaws, R. King, and M. Sprague. Deep learning for in situ data compression of large turbulent flow simulations. Physical Review Fluids, 5:114602, 2020.
[84] T. Bao, S. Chen, T. T. Johnson, P. Givi, S. Sammak, and X. Jia. Physics guided neural networks for spatio-temporal super-resolution of turbulent flows. In J. Cussens and K. Zhang, editors, Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, volume 180, pages 118-128, 2022.
[85] C. White, R. Tu, J. Kossaifi, G. Pekhimenko, K. Azizzadenesheli, and A. Anandkumar. Speeding up Fourier neural operators via mixed precision. arXiv pre-print 2307.15034, 2023.
[86] T. Lu and C. K. Law. Toward accommodating realistic fuel chemistry in large-scale computations. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 35(2):192-215, 2009.
[87] W. T. Chung, M. Ihme, K. S. Jung, J. H. Chen, J. Guo, D. Brouzet, M. Talei, B. Jiang, B. Savard, A. Y. Poludnenko, B. Akoush, P. Sharma, and A. Tamkin. BLASTNet Simulation Dataset, 2023. URL https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7242864.
[88] D. G. Goodwin, H. K. Moffat, I. Schoegl, R. L. Speth, and B. W. Weber. Cantera: An object-oriented software toolkit for chemical kinetics, thermodynamics, and transport processes, 2022.
[89] R. J. Kee, F. M. Rupley, and J. A. Miller. Chemkin-II: A Fortran chemical kinetics package for the analysis of gas-phase chemical kinetics. Sandia National Laboratory Technical Report SAND-89-8009, 1989.
[90] T. Saad, D. Cline, R. Stoll, and J. C. Sutherland. Scalable tools for generating synthetic isotropic turbulence with arbitrary spectra. AIAA Journal, 55(1):327-331, 2017.
[91] G. P. Smith, Y. Tao, and H. Wang. Foundational fuel chemistry model version 1.0 (FFCM-1), 2016. http://nanoenergy.stanford.edu/ffcm1, 2016.
[92] B. Franzelli, E. Riber, L. Y. Gicquel, and T. Poinsot. Large eddy simulation of combustion instabilities in a lean partially premixed swirled flame. Combustion and Flame, 159(2): 621-637, 2012.
[93] T. P. Coffee. Kinetic mechanisms for premixed, laminar, steady state methane/air flames. Combustion and Flame, 55(2):161-170, 1984.
[94] M. Baum, T. Poinsot, and D. Thévenin. Accurate boundary conditions for multicomponent reactive flows. Journal of Computational Physics, 116(2):247-261, 1995.
[95] C. S. Yoo, Y. Wang, A. Trouve, and H. G. Im. Characteristic boundary conditions for direct simulations of turbulent counterflow flames. Combustion Theory and Modelling, 9(4):617-646, 2005.
[96] C. S. Yoo and H. G. Im. Characteristic boundary conditions for simulations of compressible reacting flows with multi-dimensional, viscous and reaction effects. Combustion Theory and Modelling, 11(2):259-286, 2007.
[97] J. Li, Z. Zhao, A. Kazakov, and F. L. Dryer. An updated comprehensive kinetic model of hydrogen combustion. International Journal of Chemical Kinetics, 36(10):566-575, 2004.
[98] R. Wang, K. Kashinath, M. Mustafa, A. Albert, and R. Yu. Towards physics-informed deep learning for turbulent flow prediction. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, pages 1457-1466, 2020.
[99] P. Henderson, J. Hu, J. Romoff, E. Brunskill, D. Jurafsky, and J. Pineau. Towards the systematic reporting of the energy and carbon footprints of machine learning. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 21:248, 2020.